User talk:Famberhorst/Archive 1

Famberhorst/Archive 1: 2013

Panorama

Hi Famberhorst, I maked a panorama from your images, please visit File:Panoramic view of Lac du Miage.jpg, thanks --The Photographer (talk) 19:45, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Flowers photography

Just a few words about your photographs of flowers. I think three remarks can help you : a/ on the QI page, you've to avoid all JPEG artifacts. So it can be better to shoot RAW files, instead of JPEG. In all cases too much sharpness is not good. b/ I'm not a specialist but I like shooting flowers and I know the main problem is depth of field (DOF on Commons) : the whole flower has to be sharp. Concerning this problem, I've noticed that you don't use optimal camera settings : why don't you try with 200 ISO (especially in winter) and an aperture of F/11 (usually the best on a great majority of lenses and, in any case, better than F/5.6) ? c/ Third remark : you can use a tripod, sometimes necessary with low speeds. -- I hope you'll understand my English, which is not really good... but I don't speak any other foreign language. I hope my advices will help you a bit. Best regards from France ! --JLPC (talk) 21:48, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Lidcactus

Hi Famberhorst, and thanks a lot for uploading these images. Please note that all plants and animals on Commons are sorted into categories with their scientific name. So your Christmas Cacti should be put into Category:Schlumbergera, or even better into the appropriate subcategories of the relevant species. Regards, De728631 (talk) 16:34, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Your QICs...

...are getting better and better, I just promoted one more. They are not grainy/unsharp anymore. Keep on this way! Poco a poco (talk) 06:28, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you.--Steinsplitter (talk) 17:10, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Please do not remove sections from your talk page. You're welcome to archive your talk page. You can have this done automatically for you - simply place {{subst:User:MiszaBot/usertalksetup}} at the top of your user talk page and old messages will be archived after 1 month (see User:MiszaBot/usertalksetup for more details). Regards--Steinsplitter (talk) 17:15, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Campanula latifolia

What do you think of this version? --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 16:41, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Paddestoelen

Graag niet zomaar aannemen welke paddestoelsoort je ziet. Paddestoelen van West-Europa of Paddestoelen en schimmels van West-Europa van Roger Phillips is met 288 bladzijden-editie een heel aardig boek als je beter wegwijs wilt worden in verschillende soorten paddestoelen die in Nederland aan zijn te treffen. Sommige bibliotheken hebben dat boek op de plank staan. Mvg Sonty (talk) 16:24, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Refuge des Mouterres, Plateau d'emparis, (2260 m.) 01.JPG nomination

Hi Famberhorst; Recently you tried to nominate File:Refuge des Mouterres, Plateau d'emparis, (2260 m.) 01.JPG. Paste "Refuge des Mouterres, Plateau d'emparis, (2260 m.) 01.JPG" into the first box of Commons:Valued_image_candidates. Paste "|Refuge des Mouterres, Plateau d'emparis, (2260 m.) 01.JPG" on Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list immediately above "<!-- ADD NEW NOMINATIONS ABOVE THIS LINE -->". Please note the leading "|" symbol. I hope this helps. Best wishes, --Walter Siegmund (talk) 18:25, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Park Heremastate. Brug over vijver.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Park Heremastate. Brug over vijver.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:01, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Dahlia 'Bishop of Auckland.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dahlia 'Bishop of Auckland.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:00, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Amerikaanse windmolen.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Amerikaanse windmolen.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:00, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Old farm wagon, plateau d'Emparis, Hautes-Alpes, France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment The scope should include a category or a gallery.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:42, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

 Done - Hi, Famberhorst ! I've saved the category you wanted to create (with another name) and modified the scope on this page. Look at the line "scope" above if you want to nominate other pictures. Friendly. --JLPC (talk) 08:53, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

 Support : all criteria met now. --JLPC (talk) 08:55, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fontaine pétrifiante des Clots, Villard-de-Lans, Isère, France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The scope is too broad. It would be enough to give the place the scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment Sorry, I do not know exactly what you mean..--Famberhorst (talk) 06:05, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Done --JLPC (talk) 07:25, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Very good image, and useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:44, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Refuge des Mouterres, Hautes-Alpes, France, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment The scope is not very understandable --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:10, 20 October 2013

 Done --JLPC (talk) 12:38, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:29, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 01:33, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mizoën, Hautes-Alpes hydrologisch systeem van Isère, France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:39, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church tower of Mizoën, Isère, France SW view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful. (Scope modified : I hope you'll agree). --JLPC (talk) 09:46, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Landmark on plateau d'Emparis, High Alps, France..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --JLPC (talk) 12:42, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:54, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Landmark in col de l'Aiguillon, Hautes-Alpes, France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support. [Scope corrected. I think the new category you created insn't useful, but I don't know how to suppress it (!)]. --JLPC (talk) 17:40, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
 Comment Category: Col de l'Aiguillon existed but wrong. I myself Category: Col de l'Aiguillon created in Hautes-Alpes.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:14, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

I'm very sorry and I apologize. I corrected my mistake and decided to have a look at my old geography book ! --JLPC (talk) 21:02, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Le lac noir, La Grave (Hautes-Alpes), France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support I changed the caption and scope. Best in scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:19, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
 Comment Okay Thank you. --Famberhorst (talk) 17:28, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:04, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Le Chazelet, La Grave, Hautes-Alpes, France..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lac Lérié La Grave, Hautes-Alpes in France..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met now. --JLPC (talk) 16:10, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:59, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Le Signal de la Grave, La Grave, Hautes-Alpes in France..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 17:22, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:00, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rif de la Planche Écrins National park, France..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 18:20, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:52, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Col d'Arsine Écrins National park, France..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met imo. --JLPC (talk) 10:10, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:07, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lac du Glacier d'Arsine Écrins National park, France..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support I think, it's the best in scope.--XRay ^talk 20:13, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 06:13, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
L'Alpe de Villar-d'Arène, (2078 m.) Écrins National park, France..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 16:38, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Landmark on the GR 10, Clot de la Selle, Hautes-Alpes, France..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met. (I've changed the scope a bit.) --JLPC (talk) 16:12, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:46, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
"La Barre des Ecrins", from the "Chemin du Roy" - "Le Monêtier", Hautes Alpes, France..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Nice image but bad scope. I suggest: "La Barre des Ecrins", from the "Chemin du Roy" - "Le Monêtier", Hautes Alpes, France. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:52, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
 Done Thank you. I hope I have understood it correctly, and that you meant it that way.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:08, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

• Nice and Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:47, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Information panel at the entrance to the nature reserve in the province of Friesland in the Netherlands..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 17:49, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:48, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
War memorial in Elfbergen Gaasterland, nature reserve in Friesland, Netherlands..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 18:17, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:53, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bridge over the pond in Elfbergen , Gaasterland. Nature in the province of Friesland in the Netherlands..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:21, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 23:13, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fuchsia magellanica Arauco. Bloem bellenplant. Botanical in Netherlands hardy upright fuchsia. Growth: shrub. Inflorescence: ankle. Calyx color: white. Crown color: violet..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The binomial name should be in italics followed by the vernacular name and the reduction of the scope to the part shown. which gives: Fuchsia magellanica Arauco flower. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:35, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Done I hope you meant it that way.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:50, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment No, there are several botanical sections: Habitus, flowers, leaves, seeds ... here must be after the binomial name, write: flower. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:55, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Done I hope.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:33, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Good but the term "flower" would suffice. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:37, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Trail for children, Gaasterland (Friesland province, The Netherlands).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment This is a description, not a scope. Regards, Yann (talk) 05:32, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
  * Thank you. I hope that the description is better now.--Famberhorst (talk) 07:18, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
  • I think it's better, but it's a big long IMO. Maybe just "Trail for children, Gaasterland, The Netherlands" would be enough. In which category would you add it Category:Galleries of valued images?
     Done Thank you. New category created.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:29, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
    • I changed it to what I think it is valuable scope. Revert if you don't like it. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:54, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Good Now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:00, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
  • •  Comment Thanks everyone for help. I do not. Command of English --Famberhorst (talk) 18:36, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:09, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Geranium cultivar 'Nimbus' flower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Looks the change of scope for a cultivar. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:20, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
 Comment Thank you.--Famberhorst (talk) 19:17, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:32, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Col de Balme4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Everything just feels right --Peachoftree 21:01, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamamelis intermedia Aphrodite (toverhazelaar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Seems ok. --Mattbuck 05:09, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour Du Queyras 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:23, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krokus (Crocus) en Galanthus nivalis (sneeuwklok.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:42, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mol (Talpa europaea) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 19:09, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krokus (Crocus).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Better than the previous ones : QI for me. --JLPC 19:02, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lenteroos (Helleborus orientalis).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality imo. --JLPC 18:11, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Park Heremastate Joure.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:19, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Japans hoefblad (Petasites japonicus) 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 14:39, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Afvoer pitrus (Juncus effusus).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 11:10, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Afvoer pitrus (Juncus effusus) 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 08:03, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterinlaat.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not exciting, but ok --Poco a poco 16:09, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pitrus (Juncus effusus) 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done Good quality. --Grondin 14:56, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krokus (Crocus) 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments For me good --Hockei 17:34, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krokus (Crocus) 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:09, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vogelreservaat.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Veratrum nigrum.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:05, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sleutelbloem (Primula vernis).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:05, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anemone ranunculoïdes.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 09:16, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lenteroos (Helleborus orientalis) 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 08:24, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mukdenia Rossii.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 18:44, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blauwe anemoon (Anemone blanda).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:01, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scilla siberica..JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:35, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lamium orvala 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 18:00, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geranium cantabrigiense 'Karmina'.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 17:01, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Primula margotae (x) 'Garryarde Guinevere' 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:39, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lenteroos (Helleborus orientalis) 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polystichum setiferum 'Pulcherrimum Bevis' 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Some minor motion blur in full view but QI anyway --Kreuzschnabel 20:39, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dicentra spectabilis 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:11, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alchemilla mollis 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:46, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viola heartthrob.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Please add descr. in English and create or delete the category in red. --Cayambe 05:55, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tiarella 'Ninja'.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:51, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Asarum splendens..JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:35, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cercis chinensis 'Avondale.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:01, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boerengans Anser anser forma domesticus.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Arcalino 19:30, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hosta June 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 18:34, 20 May 2013 (UTC) Needs proper categorization (again!) Biopics 19:56, 20 May 2013 (UTC)  CommentI do not understand your question It is a Hosta June. (See above)-- Famberhorst 17:41, 21 May 2013 (UTC) A quick google search showed that it must be a hybrid called June. I changed categorization. Image itself is QI for me. --Dirtsc 21:47, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Smilacina racemosa.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Gidip 18:40, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helleborus orientalis 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hockei 20:44, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dicentra spectabilis 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 07:10, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Allium ursinum 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:42, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hyacinthoides non-scripta 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:26, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rhododendron 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:30, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Omphalodes verna 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:13, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hyacinthoides non-scripta voorjaarsbloeier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:14, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carex elata ‘Aurea – Bowles Golden’.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:32, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heuchera 'Caramel' 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:39, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saxifraga x urbium 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:29, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rhododendron 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 11:41, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dotterbloem (Caltha palustris subsp. palustris).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. Nice composition. --Kor!An 10:21, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rode klaver (Trifolium pratense).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:59, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rhododendron 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geranium 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and nice--Lmbuga 18:44, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Voorjaarszonnebloem.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:05, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rhododendron onder Betula.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Okay. --Florstein 07:22, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paardenbloem Taraxacum officinale.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 19:26, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trommelstokje.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 18:45, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geranium sanguineum 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:26, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geranium sanguineum var. striatum.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 05:51, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schijnpapaver (Meconopsis cambrica).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:32, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geranium sanguineum var. Striatum.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:07, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1492 waterinlaat 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. I like the choice of settings to depict the water flow. --Myrabella 09:00, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geranium pratense 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 08:59, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sidalcea candida ´Bianca´, Griekse malva.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 18:53, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scabiosa columbaria 'Pink Mist', duifkruid 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scabiosa columbaria 'Pink Mist', duifkruid 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:44, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geranium pratense 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 11:56, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Convolvulus sabatius 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:38, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jonkersloot met gele plomp.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orchis 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:13, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Convolvulus sabatius met insect.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:55, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rhododendron 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geranium nodosum 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Great luminosity --Christian Ferrer 20:59, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warkumerwaard (Workumerwaard) 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 18:40, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warkumerwaard (Workumerwaard) 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 17:27, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warkumerwaard (Workumerwaard).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slightly over-sharpned, otherwise good quality.--ArildV 20:59, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Silene maritima 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI from my point of view --Nino Verde 17:39, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orchis 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments All in focus! Good quality--Lmbuga 21:23, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heuchera marmalade 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:35, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dahlia 'Moonfire'..JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me, but strange halo at left (see note)--Lmbuga 06:56, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warkumerwaard (Workumerwaard) 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 09:33, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Warkumerwaard (Workumerwaard) 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 19:10, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orchis 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vassil 07:47, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tagetes (Afrikaantje).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Florian Fuchs 17:46, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Silene maritima 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please do a small crop left to remove the leaf edge, and make the flowers brighter. Mattbuck 21:07, 10 July 2013 (UTC) Done uitgesneden-- Famberhorst 05:13, 11 July 2013 (UTC) OK. Mattbuck 15:23, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De Alde Feanen 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK  Support --Christian Ferrer 05:28, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helenium El Dorado, zonnekruid.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 08:37, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De Alde Feanen 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality now.. --JLPC 18:17, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geranium 'Rozanne'.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good, very interesting. --Dirtsc 17:53, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berkheya 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:27, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agapanthus 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 21:55, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De Alde Feanen 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice compostion, good enough quality. I like the three planes despite the foreground is unfocused. Alvesgaspar 22:41, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oenothera stricta.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 10:43, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Astilbe 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 19:34, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fuchsia magellanica “Arauco”..JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could be a bit brighter but QI imo --JLPC 17:18, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calla 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Some overxposed areas. Gidip 14:40, 23 July 2013 (UTC)  Done Kleine correctie.-- Famberhorst 15:43, 23 July 2013 (UTC) imho ok now --Steinsplitter 11:17, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berkheya 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Some overxposed areas. Gidip 14:40, 23 July 2013 (UTC)  Done Kleine correctie.-- Famberhorst 15:43, 23 July 2013 (UTC) Good quality now. --Steinsplitter 11:17, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Triosteum pinnatifidum.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality IMO. --NorbertNagel 16:47, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hosta in knop 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Marianne Casamance 16:08, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Telekia speciosa, (koeienoog).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pixellated. --Mattbuck 14:13, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Allis-Chalmers tractor 1937.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 11:18, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agapanthus 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Gidip 20:24, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Begonia pendula.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Lovely --Jonathunder 02:56, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De Alde Feanen 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 06:38, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hosta met Sutera cordata.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Possibly oversharpened but ok. --Mattbuck 17:02, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Insectenhotel 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 18:30, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Insectenhotel 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:55, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bloem van Hosta.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done correctie.-- Famberhorst 05:07, 10 August 2013 (UTC)  Support Ok--Lmbuga 14:26, 10 August 2013 (UTC) Sorry, I forgot the word promotion--Lmbuga 11:09, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Impatiens 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:56, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agapanthus (bloem) 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMHO the white balance is off. The photo has a remarkable blue cast. --Tuxyso 06:21, 8 August 2013 (UTC)  Done Correctie witbalans.-- Famberhorst 16:16, 8 August 2013 (UTC) Better and QI now. --Tuxyso 17:22, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deinanthe.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice --Rolf H. 19:46, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helenium El Dorado.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  SupportOK for me --Rjcastillo 17:45, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kinderspeeltoestel 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:51, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kinderspeeltoestel 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Campanula 'Pink Octopus' 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. You might consider geocoding the location (you have written what the locality is though, so one can always look it up). --Slaunger 18:32, 8 August 2013 (UTC)  Comment Thank you. I'll try to find.-- Famberhorst 06:02, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Educatieve doe- en beleeftuin van It Fryske Gea nabij De Alde Feanen. 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dirtsc 15:53, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Insectenhotel.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Kreuzschnabel 22:23, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handwijzer.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Kreuzschnabel 22:15, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bezoekerscentrum Nationaal Park De Alde Feanen.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bit unsharp IMO. Mattbuck 20:44, 6 August 2013 (UTC)  Done correctie.-- Famberhorst 05:09, 7 August 2013 (UTC) It now has sharpening haloes. Mattbuck 19:05, 8 August 2013 (UTC)  Done Last attempt.-- Famberhorst 05:13, 9 August 2013 (UTC) Better. Mattbuck 07:02, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antieke hooischudder Fries Landbouw Museum.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 20:44, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anemone 'Eugenie' 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Sharp and usefull--Lmbuga 19:06, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anemone 'Eugenie' 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leerpad voor kinderen 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, and I like the framing --Kreuzschnabel 16:08, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hosta Captain Kirk.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 17:58, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hydrangea macrophylla (Hortensia).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:05, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eucomis.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for the quality but there is a problem with a categorie of your file --Christian Ferrer 19:19, 12 August 2013 (UTC)  Done Dank u. Category aangepast.-- Famberhorst 05:03, 13 August 2013 (UTC)  Support OK for me --Christian Ferrer 11:28, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eucomis 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:30, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agapanthus in knop.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I fixed the cat --Poco a poco 14:46, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stachys macrantha 'Superba'.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for me.--Jebulon 16:37, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aster thomsonii.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:37, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hydrangea quercifolia (eikenbladhortensia).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 20:58, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clematis tangutica.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pretty, but feels a little blue. Tell me the colour balance is right and I'll promote. Mattbuck 06:56, 10 August 2013 (UTC)  Comment The photo was taken in RAW and have saved in JPG. Him without processing The blue dots in the picture are a Salvia.-- Famberhorst 15:42, 10 August 2013 (UTC)  Done Small correction.-- Famberhorst 16:01, 16 August 2013 (UTC) OK. Mattbuck 20:43, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hosta June 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 16:45, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Astrantia major 'Roma'.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --AmaryllisGardener 22:33, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geranium 'Sandrine'..JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --AmaryllisGardener 16:50, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geranium wallichianum 'Crystal Lake'.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --AmaryllisGardener 02:14, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alcea x Althaea ‘Park Rondell’.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jean11 09:40, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Artemisia lactiflora.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 04:21, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lunaria rediviva (vaste Judaspenning).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:19, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eucomis 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support IMO it's ok --Christian Ferrer 16:42, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hydrangea paniculata 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 16:00, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anemone hupehensis 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Lovely. --Mattbuck 21:40, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alcea x Althaea ‘Park Rondell’ 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 18:35, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helenium 'Flamingo'.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:07, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agapanthus praecox Snow White.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very pretty, but too bright at the top end - increase high-level contrast to darken the flower a bit, it looks overexposed as is. Mattbuck 15:22, 1 September 2013 (UTC)  Done. Okay now?-- Famberhorst 15:51, 1 September 2013 (UTC) Yes, that's better. Mattbuck 18:24, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anemone 'Honorine Jobert'.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 16:01, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dahlia 'Bishop of Auckland.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Mostly sharp and well exposed. --Barcex 11:14, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hydrangea macrophylla 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --Rjcastillo 15:45, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fuchsia 'Land van Beveren'.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Heuschrecke 10:17, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Solanum jasminoides 'Album'.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The white balance seems wrong, and the picture looks too dark or underexposed.--Jebulon 19:05, 1 September 2013 (UTC)  Done. Correctie witbalans.-- Famberhorst 05:11, 2 September 2013 (UTC)Goet, Dank U.--Jebulon 09:11, 2 September 2013 (UTC) *Graag gedaan.-- Famberhorst 15:24, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clematis 'Princess Diana'.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for QI --Martin Kraft 12:34, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Convolvulus arvensis (akkerwinde).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vassil 16:28, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lysimachia clethroides.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Heuschrecke 10:07, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Verbesina alternifolia.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Nice bokeh and good light on the buds. I would propose cropping a bit off the top, such that the space to the right and top is approximately the same. --Slaunger 12:29, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geranium wallichianum 'Buxton’s Blue’.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'd like to see more details, however, I understand the problems of the camera. This quality is enough for me --The Photographer 17:42, 11 September 2013 (UTC))

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helenium Kanaria.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I hope some sharpening, but its ok --The Photographer 17:16, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aster x frikartii 'Mönch' 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --Jean11 10:58, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phlomis russeliana, brandkruid.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:21, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bloem van Begonia pendula.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:36, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirengeshoma palmata Japanse wasbloem.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 11:55, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eikel, vrucht van Eik (Quercus) 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:51, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geranium nimbus.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 10:07, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reuzenbalsemien (Impatiens glandulifera) 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 09:17, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vruchten van tamme kastanje (Castanea sativa).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:18, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Convolvulus arvensis (Akkerwinde).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:32, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mizoën, Frankrijk (1080 m.) Church 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Refuge des Mouterres, Plateau d'emparis, (2260 m.) 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Harsh light, bottom side of the wagon is very dark (can you further brighten it?), nonetheless nice motive and QI for me. --Tuxyso 05:38, 5 October 2013 (UTC)  Comment Thanks for your advice. Minor correction. Better now?-- Famberhorst 14:54, 5 October 2013 (UTC) IMHO a bit too much of correction. The new version look warmer than the old one. I would only make some moderate corrections. --Tuxyso 15:07, 5 October 2013 (UTC)  Comment Slightly less correction.-- Famberhorst 15:43, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Refuge des Mouterres, Plateau d'emparis, (2260 m.) 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Same here: Harsh light, but imho OK for QI. --Tuxyso 05:42, 5 October 2013 (UTC)  Comment Thanks for your advice. Minor correction. Better now?-- Famberhorst 14:54, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plateau d'emparis, (2250 m.) cairn.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Kreuzschnabel 07:39, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Refuge des Mouterres, Plateau d'emparis, (2250 m.) Bijgebouw.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:57, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Refuge des Mouterres, Plateau d'emparis, (2250 m.) 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:16, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blauwe knoop Succisa pratensis 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Mattbuck 17:10, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cyclaam coum.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 10:09, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calystegia sepium 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 09:21, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reuzenbalsemien (Impatiens glandulifera) 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Mattbuck 09:21, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hydrangea macrophylla 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very pretty. --Mattbuck 09:07, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac Lérié, La Grave, Frankrijk (2400 m.) 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 17:03, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Col du Souchet, La Grave, Frankrijk (2356 m.) 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI nice mood --JLPC 11:51, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Les Clots, Mizoën, Frankrijk (1540 m.) 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It's tilted on right --Christian Ferrer 17:06, 11 October 2013 (UTC)  Done Correctie perspectief.-- Famberhorst 18:27, 11 October 2013 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 08:27, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spinsel bedekt met dauw 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paddenstoel mushroom.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great detail for such a small mushroom --Azusa 10:28, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pennisetum alopecuroides (Lampenpoetsersgras) 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 12:25, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Physostegia virginiana (scharnierplant).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very nice. A bit more pointed to the left would have been even better. --Iifar 18:34, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Refuge des Mouterres, Plateau d'emparis, (2250 m.) 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --P e z i 20:35, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plateau d'emparis (2250 m.) 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good quality --P e z i 20:25, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plateau d'emparis (2250 m.) 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good quality --P e z i 20:25, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fontaine Petrifiante (Plateau d'emparis) 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good quality --P e z i 20:16, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eikel, vrucht van Eik (Quercus) 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. nice depth of field, meets all QI creteria for me --J. Lunau 08:54, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mizoën, Frankrijk (1080 m.) Gite d'étape d'emparis 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The image needs a perspective correction (horizontal line at the bottom). The background is really gray? --XRay 16:32, 10 October 2013 (UTC)  Done Correctie perspectief. *** The color of the wall is gray.-- Famberhorst 04:43, 11 October 2013 (UTC) Good quality. I think it QI now. --XRay 05:46, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plateau d'emparis. View Massif de la Meije 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --Llorenzi 11:45, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plateau d'emparis. View Massif de la Meije 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --Llorenzi 11:45, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Col de l'Aiguillon (2059m) Fingerpost.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:00, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le Signal de la Grave, (2446 m.). cairn.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:22, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aronskelk (Zantedeschia aethiopica) 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pyb 12:29, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plateau d'emparis (2164 m.) Zicht op Le Chazelet (1800 m.) 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:22, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pennisetum alopecuroides (Lampenpoetsersgras) 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support nice --Christian Ferrer 04:54, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plateau d'emparis (2164 m.) View Massif de la Meije.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI --NorbertNagel 19:45, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Les Clots, Mizoën, Frankrijk (1540 m.) View reclaimed Barrage Chambon.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 05:23, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac Noir, La Grave, Frankrijk (2450 m.) 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 22:18, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Col du Souchet, La Grave, Frankrijk (2356 m.).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. With an acceptable very faint green flare above the la Meije summit. --Cayambe 07:41, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mizoën, Frankrijk (1080 m.) Church 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like it. --Bahnfrend 13:26, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac Lérié, La Grave, Frankrijk (2400 m.) 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 15:12, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vruchten van kastanje (Aesculus).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac Lérié, La Grave, Frankrijk (2400 m.) 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vliegenzwam (Amanita muscaria) 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Composition would be even better if taken from a lower camera position. --Kreuzschnabel 16:58, 20 October 2013 (UTC)  Comment Thanks for your tip.-- Famberhorst 04:32, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eikenblad met galappels van de eikengalwesp (Cynips quercusfolii).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:14, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villar-d'Arêne naar Refuge de l'Alpe de Villar-d'Arène.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI. --NorbertNagel 19:06, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vliegenzwam (Amanita muscaria) 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Col du Souchet, La Grave, Frankrijk (2356 m.) 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Les sources de la Romanche (2143 mètres.) 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Bgag 19:07, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Opengebarsten peulen van tamme kastanje (Castanea sativa).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think the composition could be improved with a crop; otherwise it is too distracting. --King of Hearts 18:51, 23 October 2013 (UTC) Seems ok to me. Mattbuck 19:13, 23 October 2013 (UTC)  Done Correctie gewas.-- Famberhorst 06:04, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elfbergen Gaasterland. Sfeervolle laan in de herfst.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 14:53, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bes Berberis thunbergii.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 21:22, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elfbergen Gaasterland. Brug over de vijver 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:12, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elfbergen Gaasterland. Dode eik (Quercus) 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:49, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elfbergen Gaasterland. Ingang kabouterroute.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Please remove the red category. --Cayambe 14:43, 29 October 2013 (UTC)  Done Oké.-- Famberhorst 16:14, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elfbergen Gaasterland. Kabouterroute.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:29, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elfbergen Gaasterland. Brug over de vijver 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:15, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elfbergen Gaasterland. Oorlogsmonument 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 17:13, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elfbergen Gaasterland. Ruiterpad.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:10, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elfbergen Gaasterland. Handwijzer naar oorlogsmonument.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:01, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villar-d'Arêne (Rif de la Planche 1975 m.) 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:06, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elfbergen Gaasterland. Kabouterroute 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Gnome route? Oh my... --Mattbuck 14:37, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elfbergen Gaasterland. Dode eik (Quercus) 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 08:00, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elfbergen Gaasterland. Brug over de vijver 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 18:37, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! L'Alpe de Villar-d'Arène, (2078 m.).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 21:54, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elfbergen Gaasterland Oorlogsmonument 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:11, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geranium Brutium 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:47, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac du Glacier d'Arsine, Le Monêtier-les-Bains 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:01, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elfbergen Gaasterland. Zwam aan voet van Eik.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 16:29, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac du Glacier d'Arsine, Le Monêtier-les-Bains 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Langweerderwielen-Langwarder Wielen 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice mood. QI for me. --JLPC 18:32, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elfbergen Gaasterland. Informatie oorlogsmonument 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:59, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac du Glacier d'Arsine, Le Monêtier-les-Bains 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 13:48, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zwammen op composthoop 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Please check the "english" file description. --NorbertNagel 18:47, 12 November 2013 (UTC)  Done Text adapted.-- Famberhorst 19:03, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zwam onder beuken.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. There seem to be two pixel errors above the mushroom (2 bright pixels). Can you remove? --NorbertNagel 20:24, 11 November 2013 (UTC)  Done Okay now?-- Famberhorst 06:25, 12 November 2013 (UTC) Perfect. --NorbertNagel 19:32, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Col d'Arsine (2340 m.).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --P e z i 19:28, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Col d'Arsine (2340 m.) Hautes-Alpes in France 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. --Llorenzi 15:02, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elfbergen Gaasterland. Herfsttafereel.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please sharpen. Mattbuck 20:20, 3 November 2013 (UTC)  Done Small correction.-- Famberhorst 06:17, 4 November 2013 (UTC) You went way too far with the sharpening - I want something in the middle, probably closer to the original version than the new one. Mattbuck 21:11, 5 November 2013 (UTC)  Done New opportunities, new happiness.-- Famberhorst 06:20, 6 November 2013 (UTC) I'm sure I promoted this a few days ago. Weird. Mattbuck 20:51, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blad van beuk (Fagus sylvatica) 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 17:49, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villar-d'Arêne (Rif de la Planche 1975 m.).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 08:57, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lac du Glacier d'Arsine, Le Monêtier-les-Bains 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:30, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vliegenzwam (Amanita muscaria) 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:07, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bruggetje in Wikelslân.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Atmospheric photo of good quality. --Cccefalon 18:44, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clot de la Selle. (2191 m.).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:22, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berken in Wikelslân 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. I just like it --Moroder 22:52, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blad van beuk (Fagus sylvatica) 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:05, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Park Heremastate brug over grote vijver 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 16:38, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galappel (Cynips quercusfolii) 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. I also noted the tiny insects in the foreground :) --Cccefalon 17:00, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Storm Christian teistert Nederland op maandag 28 10 2013. 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit blue I think, and I'm unsure about the crop at the top. Might also benefit from perspective correction. Mattbuck 21:58, 19 November 2013 (UTC)  Done Small correction.-- Famberhorst 06:29, 20 November 2013 (UTC)  Support QI --P e z i 23:44, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zwammen op composthoop 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:57, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chemin du roy le monêtier 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 12:39, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paddenstoel Jonkervallei 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks good, DoF well choosen. --Tuxyso 15:31, 27 November 2013 (UTC)  Comment Thank you.-- Famberhorst 15:37, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chemin du roy le monêtier 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Although some irrelevant CA --94.163.175.143 Moroder 16:04, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waternavel (Hydrocotyle) in Wikelslân.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 17:16, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paddenstoel Jonkervallei 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brede stekelvaren (Dryopteris dilatata) in Wikelslân.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well done. --Cccefalon 21:18, 28 November 2013 (UTC)  Comment Thank you.-- Famberhorst 05:47, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Park Heremastate. Grote vijver 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.Good quality.--ArildV 09:59, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Park Heremastate. Herfstsfeer.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent! Thanks. --Moroder 22:19, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chemin du roy le monêtier 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 11:39, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blad Hydrangea paniculata.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:39, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Langweerderwielen-Langwarder Wielen 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 10:41, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Natuurreservaat in Wikelslân.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The photo's vertical line is inclining slightly clockwise. An additional horizontal correction might be necessary to get the planks horizontal. What about the halo? Possible to reduce? --Cccefalon 09:10, 2 December 2013 (UTC)  Done Correction. Top shelf horizontally.-- Famberhorst 16:28, 2 December 2013 (UTC) Let's assume, that for outdoor purpose not all planks are installed perpendicular :) --Cccefalon 20:02, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vruchten van Magnolia (beverboom).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:42, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fopzwam (Laccaria laccata).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:55, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kroondomein. Rustgebied grofwild.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 16:19, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zwammen op composthoop 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Pleclown 12:52, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ademwortels van moerascipres 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:44, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spinneraggen in Wikelslân.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Weak support It looks like a little bit unsharp, but IMO it's till QI. --XRay 09:40, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grijze buisjeszwam (Bjerkandera adusta) It Wikelslân.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:27, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zwammen op stam 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:12, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Langweerderwielen-Langwarder Wielen 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'd crop it to be much shorter, but ok. --Mattbuck 20:41, 9 December 2013 (UTC) *** Do you want that I Trimming the picture?-- Famberhorst 19:29, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Park Heremastate. Grote vijver 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok. --Cccefalon 11:29, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Langweerderwielen-Langwarder Wielen 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 06:00, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geranium wallichianum 'Buxton’s Blue’ 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 17:00, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zwammen op composthoop 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit dark overall, but ok --Poco a poco 19:44, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bomengroep aan waterkant in It Wikelslân.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:23, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zwammen op stam 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:27, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mizoën, Frankrijk (1080 m.).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, good depth - could it get a tiny bit more "snap" in the colors? QI either way, Mr.choppers 23:31, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paddenstoelen op els 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Holleday 20:09, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ademwortels van moerascipres 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:40, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balsemien (Impatiens)..JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:44, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clematis tangutica (zaadpluis) 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:20, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Japanse wasbloem, Kirengeshoma palmata.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good. DOF nicely choosen, even the spider in the background can be identified. --Cccefalon 12:44, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blad van klimop (Hedera helix) 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:23, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Storm Christian teistert Nederland op maandag 28 10 2013. 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:54, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scabiosa columbaria 'Pink Mist', duifkruid 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --Stepro 15:25, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruig weer boven Langweerderwielen 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:45, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paarse korstzwam (Chondrostereum purpureum).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 16:09, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vliegenzwam (Amanita muscaria) 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:18, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Park Heremastate brug over grote vijver 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:00, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ochtendgloren boven Broek-Zuid (De Broek). 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:05, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blad klimhortensia Hydrangea anomala.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kroondomein, weg langs Koningskuil.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:53, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mûzekamp Boornzwaag 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'm not convinced, that this can be a QI: In my opinion, it is not a good idea to shoot with 1/60 while having strong winds. Of course I have to expect motion blur within the tree branches and gras stems. I am missing an overall sharpness in this photo. The right side of the photo is starting to show artefacts in full resolution. --Cccefalon 08:31, 27 December 2013 (UTC)  Done different version. Unfortunatly, the new version is not better. Please note the small white artefacts (looks like snow) above the trees. --Cccefalon 18:25, 27 December 2013 (UTC)  Done New opportunities. New happiness.-- Famberhorst 06:49, 28 December 2013 (UTC)  Support It was worth the efforts. The artefacts are gone and the quality is considerably better. Of course, it's still borderline to get a clear shot of the branches at 1/60, I hink it can pass as QI. --Cccefalon 09:29, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

ArchiveBot

Hi, I noticed you have set up User:MiszaBot to archive your talk page. Unfortunately, the bot has stopped working, and given how its operator is inactive, it is unclear when/if this will fixed. For the time being, I have volunteered to operate a MiszaBot clone (running the exact same code). With that said, your input would be appreciated at Commons:Bots/Requests/ArchiveBot 1. Regards, FASTILY 07:45, 20 April 2014 (UTC)