Espandero

Archives

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sex de Marinda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 04:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barrage de Moiry en hiver.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 04:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Espace Weisshorn depuis le sud.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Laitche 21:44, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weisshorn depuis Sorebois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Laitche 21:44, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Les Diablons depuis Sorebois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Laitche 21:44, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Restaurant de Sorebois et télécabine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 20:21, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Val d'Anniviers depuis Sorebois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:42, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Espace Weisshorn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Thi 11:09, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aiguilles Rouges d'Arolla depuis Sorebois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:42, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église de Vouvry.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 19:38, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Joseph de Schmitten - Vue de l'ouest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 19:37, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pointe de Tsevalire et Becs de Bosson.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support In full resolution there are some spots which aren't as sharp as others, but given the large resolution IMHO it is good enough for QI. --C messier 20:44, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monorail de vigne - gorges de la Morge (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:15, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Branson depuis Grand Champ.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:30, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église de Monthey - Nuit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:30, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gorges de la Morge de Conthey (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:30, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Chillon - Façade ouest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:06, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le Châtelet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Could get a bit more NR but still good. --Plozessor 05:37, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église paroissiale de Saint-Léonard - Chœur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This is a) a bit noisy, b) the sunlit spots are burned out and c) the right side is too dark. Would accept each of those, but probably not the combination. Any chance to improve it with better raw conversion? --Plozessor 05:37, 26 January 2024 (UTC) @Plozessor: I tried uploading a new version. Is it any better? - Espandero 22:49, 26 January 2024 (UTC)  Support Borderline sharpness but ok! --Plozessor 07:02, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Maya.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:51, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Laurent de Riddes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good image. Slight CW tilt. Blurred spot in the sky to the right of the steeple could be cloned out. Useful to add the cemetery in the Summary/Description. --Tagooty 02:57, 26 January 2024 (UTC) @Tagooty:  Done - Espandero 22:49, 26 January 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 09:01, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Embouchure Baye de Montreux-Léman.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 20:35, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Folklore 2024 has started, Join us!

Hello Espandero,

Greetings from the Wiki Loves Folklore International Team! Wiki Loves Folklore is an international photography contest hosted on Wikimedia Commons to document folklore and intangible cultural heritage from around the world, such as folk festivals, folk dances, folk music, folk activities, folk games, folk cuisine, folk wear, folktales, folk games, folk religion, mythology, and many more.

The campaign invites participants to document photographs, videos, and audios linked to folk culture and fit within the contest's theme. Through this campaign, you may become a part of a community dedicated to preserving our intangible culture, which has been brought and passed down for thousands of years.

How can I Contribute?

The dates for the submission in the photography contest on Wikimedia Commons are from 1 February 2024 through 31 March 2024. Probably you are wondering how you can take part. It’s simple: grab a camera, record an image, video or audio under the folklore theme and start uploading or Click on Upload Now Icon which is available on right side of Wiki Loves Folklore 2024. To learn more about the rules, check out our Project page on Wikimedia Commons.

Here are the exciting prizes which you can win internationally.

International Prizes

• 1st prize: 400 USD
• 2nd prize: 300 USD
• 3rd prize: 100 USD
• Top 10 consolation prizes: 40 USD (each)
• Best Video prize and best Audio prize: 50 USD (each)
• Top uploader prize for images: First Prize: 300 USD, Second prize: 150 USD
• Wiki Loves Folklore Postcards to top 100 Uploaders
• Certificates and postcards to Local Organizers.

(Disclaimer : The above prizes will only be disbursed in the form of gift card or voucher format only) You can win both International prizes and your local Prizes simultaneously !

If you are interested in participating in the photography campaign, start photographing and collecting media of your local culture and get ready for the photo campaign happening on Wikimedia Commons. For more information about rules and prizes of the contest, refer here. For any questions, email us or join our telegram group here

Warm regards,

Gaurav and Issac

#WeTogether

Wiki Loves Folklore International Team.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:01, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le Portalet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 22:04, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aiguille du Glacier Rond.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 18:03, 17 February 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Kurmanbek 20:01, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tours d'Aï et de Mayen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:19, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Morcles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:11, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sorbus aucuparia in Grimentz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:23, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tours d'Aï, de Mayen et de Famelon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:23, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Didier de Collombey.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:13, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pointe des Mossettes - 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:43, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pointe de Chésery - 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:43, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Boudry.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:31, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pas de Chavanette - 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 10:26, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clocher de l'ancienne église de Vionnaz et cimetière.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 20:55, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Lucens - 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:34, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Vufflens et vignes (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, but it needs a perspective correction and I'd reduce the noise in the sky --Poco a poco 14:42, 17 March 2024 (UTC) @Poco a poco:  Done - Espandero 16:52, 17 March 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:13, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Collège de Chardonne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:40, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Avoriaz - 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:40, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monastère de Collombey.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Трифонов Андрей 15:08, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Col du Mont d'Orzeires enneigé.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 12:09, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le Lieu et dent de Vaulion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 12:09, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eglise du Pont.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:37, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pégase du Pont.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support There is some violet fringing, but not critical IMO. Good. Nice subject. --LexKurochkin 17:43, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riviera, Chablais et Léman.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --SHB2000 12:23, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison de commune de Collombey-Muraz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Acroterion 01:52, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dent de Vaulion enneigée.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:23, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison Barberini.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:59, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sergio Aguero statue at the City of Manchester Stadium by night.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment We must add a geocoding in caption. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
  Archaeodontosaurus  Done - Espandero (talk) 09:30, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment OK for the geocoding but we must connect the scope to the category or gallery that contains the image  --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
  Archaeodontosaurus  Done - Espandero (talk) 07:43, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vincent Kompany statue at the City of Manchester Stadium by night.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment We must add a geocoding in caption. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
  Archaeodontosaurus  Done - Espandero (talk) 09:30, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Question Isn't a link to some relevant category possible? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:28, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment OK for the geocoding but we must connect the scope to the category or gallery that contains the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
  Archaeodontosaurus  Done - Espandero (talk) 07:41, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
David Silva statue at the City of Manchester Stadium by night.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment We must add a geocoding in caption. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
  Archaeodontosaurus  Done - Espandero (talk) 09:31, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment OK for the geocoding but we must connect the scope to the category or gallery that contains the image  --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
  Archaeodontosaurus  Done - Espandero (talk) 07:42, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pas de Chavanette ski slope from the East..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:23, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pointe des Mossettes in Winter from the south-east..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:23, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint-Laurent church in Riddes, Switzerland, and its cemetery..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:23, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église de Monthey - Plafond 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 17:33, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Weisshorn from the west in Winter..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint-Léonard (Valais), general overview.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Château de la Soie, seen from the northeast (castle and hill).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église de Monthey - Tribune de l'orgue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. But it could use a lttle tilt (like 1-2 dgrees CCW) --Tobias ToMar Maier 23:11, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église de Monthey - Statue de Saint-Bernard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tobias ToMar Maier 23:11, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église de Monthey - Statue du bienheureux Nicolas de Flüe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tobias ToMar Maier 23:11, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église paroissiale Saint-Gall de Chalais from the south.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:06, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Veysonnaz from the west..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:39, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lac des Toules from the south.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:39, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église de Monthey - Statue de Sainte-Cécile.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs PC --Tagooty 02:47, 2 April 2024 (UTC) Tagooty:  Done --Espandero 18:56, 2 April 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 14:21, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église de Monthey - Statue de Saint-Émile.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs PC --Tagooty 02:47, 2 April 2024 (UTC) Tagooty:  Done --Espandero 18:56, 2 April 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 14:21, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église de Monthey - Statue de Sainte-Catherine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 14:21, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église de Monthey - Statue de Saint-Jean.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 18:04, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Vièze à Monthey.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ezarate 22:06, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Embouchure Gryonne-Rhône.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ezarate 22:06, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Embouchure Vièze-Rhône.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:24, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Embouchure Vièze-Rhône (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:06, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Les Mangettes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:07, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gryonne à Bex.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:24, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Jean-Baptiste de Massongex.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments tilted cw --Ezarate 22:04, 14 April 2024 (UTC) Ezarate  Done. --Espandero 19:16, 16 April 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ezarate 19:10, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église de Monthey - Statue de Saint-Maurice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 06:57, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Embouchure Vièze-Rhône (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 14:13, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rhône depuis le pont gazoduc - Aval.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Lorax 04:17, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Embouchure Avançon-Rhône.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 15:21, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Jean-Baptiste de Massongex - Dédicace de Sextus Varennus Priscus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Picture is ok, please use English description here on the nomination page. --Plozessor 04:27, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église de Choëx - Autels et chœur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 16:34, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église de Choëx - Autels et chœur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 21:28, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église de Choëx - Médaillon chantourné - Dieu le Père.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 20:42, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église de Choëx - Médaillon chantourné - Baptême de l'empereur Constantin par saint Sylvestre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 00:04, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église de Choëx - Médaillon chantourné - Annonciation.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 00:04, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Corbières depuis le pont de Corbières.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 21:57, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barrage de Rossens depuis l'ouest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:03, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Notre-Dame de l’Assomption de La Roche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:05, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Notre-Dame de la Nativité de Corbières.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:05, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église de Choëx - Pilastre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:37, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église de Choëx - Tribune de l'orgue et entrée.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Théodule du Pâquier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality but requires slight perspective adjustment! --Scotch Mist 09:40, 25 April 2024 (UTC) Scotch Mist:  Done --Espandero 18:30, 25 April 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:27, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Corbières.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Établissement scolaire de Vuadens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 05:42, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corbières et son château.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Shadows could be a bit brighter, but overall good quality. --Milseburg 10:27, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sex de Marinda from the East in winter..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment It would be good to put the view orientation. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

  Archaeodontosaurus  Done, thanks. --Espandero (talk) 17:23, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:26, 2 May

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:34, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:CHE Naters COA.svg

Copyright status: File:CHE Naters COA.svg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:CHE Naters COA.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:CHE Noble-Contrée COA alt.svg

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 21:06, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapelle Saint-Blaise de Saint-Triphon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:21, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour de Saint-Triphon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:21, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ollon depuis Saint-Triphon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lrkrol 20:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yvorne - Mai 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:00, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Sainte-Marguerite de Vérossaz - Vitrail de Saint-Sigismond.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 20:40, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pierre druidique de Combrevoux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:33, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Sainte-Marguerite de Vérossaz - Vitrail de Saint-Maurice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:31, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Sainte-Marguerite de Vérossaz - Autel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:43, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Sainte-Marguerite de Vérossaz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. Needs some PC. If this is a stitched panorama, please indicate in the summary and CATs. --Tagooty 02:38, 12 May 2024 (UTC)  Done - Espandero 09:47, 12 May 2024 (UTC) The tower is vertical, but the building sides and flagpole are leaning to the left. --Tagooty 03:09, 14 May 2024 (UTC) Tagooty  Done. Please note that the right part of the south wall (facing the camera) is a little tilted in real life. I think this is as far as I can get to a perfect PC. Thanks, Espandero 19:14, 15 May 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality, thanks for your efforts --Tagooty 04:47, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Sainte-Marguerite de Vérossaz - Intérieur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. But if it is stitched from multiple frames, it should probably be marked as such --MB-one 11:21, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Sainte-Marguerite de Vérossaz - Tribune.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 10:40, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gorges de la Vièze - Passerelle et chemin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:47, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vièze depuis le pont du Diable.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 00:04, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gorges de la Vièze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 19:34, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ringebu Stave Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The image looks a bit oversaturated but I think it is still QI. --- Spurzem 18:57, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lillehammer Church in June 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality -- Spurzem 18:59, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Storting building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 13:30, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rothorn depuis l'Illhorn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:44, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pissevache depuis la route de la Cascade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support High contrast again but still ok. --Plozessor 04:44, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le Tsapé.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 15:41, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de La Sarraz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit overcontrasted so that the green space in front of the castle is too dark. Can you fix this? --Plozessor 04:44, 24 July 2024 (UTC) Plozessor: I think it's better now. Thanks for your time. - Espandero 19:52, 24 July 2024 (UTC)  Support Thx! Good quality. --Plozessor 05:51, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chalais VS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments WB should be checked. --Ermell 22:23, 24 July 2024 (UTC) Ermell:  Done - Espandero 16:59, 29 July 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Lrkrol 07:29, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Village de Lens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slightly tilted CCW. Also not perfectly sharp but still acceptable. --Plozessor 04:45, 25 July 2024 (UTC) Plozessor:  Done - Espandero 16:59, 29 July 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Lrkrol 07:29, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elisa Desco - Sierre-Zinal 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:06, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Camilla Magliano - Sierre-Zinal 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:06, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cristina Simion - Sierre-Zinal 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 19:35, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Joyce Muthoni Njeru - Sierre-Zinal 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 19:35, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

Logos of Wiler and Turtmann-Unterems

Is there is a reason why these logos are copyrighted even though it is mean for the governments of municipalities themselves? Like if it belongs to the municipal governments, it should have been free (like flags and coats of arms). SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 19:29, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

There is no law saying that everything made by a Swiss municipality is automatically public domain. Neither of the images come from "a law, ordinance, international treaty or other official act, a decision, protocol or report by public authorities, a means of payment or a patent or patent application", so I see no reason to consider the municipalities' logo to be public domain. I think I've told you this before, and I feel like a few logos have been deleted of Commons for this exact reason already. Let's see what an admin says about this but I'd generally prefer if you could abstain from uploading those files on Commons because then I have to reupload them to Wikipédia once they're deleted. Obvious simple designs like File:CHE Sion Logo.svg are alright though. Thanks, Espandero (talk) 19:38, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

You probably won't delete the logos that contain the coats of arms. OK, I apologize for the misunderstanding because I thought most municipal logos are free from Swiss copyright law. So for now, these will remain on Wikipedia until copyright expires, right? SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 19:40, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

It's not the same treatment as coats of arms. Those are under specific rules that allow uses for encyclopedic work. Logos that took strong inspiration from the COA might be OK but I can't be sure yet. - Espandero (talk) 19:45, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

Okay. I think for the other ones, we had to wait for 70 years to pass from what I heard. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 20:26, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brigue du nord-ouest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:33, 4 September 2024 (UTC)  Support Good --FBilula 14:34, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le château Stockalper de l'ouest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 21:28, 3 September 2024 (UTC)  Support Very good --FBilula 14:34, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le château Stockalper du sud.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 21:28, 3 September 2024 (UTC)  Support Good --FBilula 14:34, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Sionne à La Sionne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Platz der Stadt Monthey - Plakette.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:43, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Uhlanddenkmal in Tübingen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:35, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turku Castle in September 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 14:44, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paul Keres relief.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 05:16, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pigeon in Tallinn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FreCha 10:47, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aura in Turku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality (maybe the shadows are just too dark). --C messier 19:14, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Sionne à La Sionne (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 19:51, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paul Keres relief.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 05:16, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pigeon in Tallinn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FreCha 10:47, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aura in Turku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality (maybe the shadows are just too dark). --C messier 19:14, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

2022 Picture of the Year: Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo), Little Egret (Egretta garzetta) and Gadwall (Mareca strepera) in Nepal.

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 14 October 2024, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porvoo Cathedral in September 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 16:03, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porvoo Old Town Hall in September 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs perspective correction. --C messier 19:26, 26 September 2024 (UTC) C messier  Done, thanks. - Espandero 19:57, 1 October 2024 (UTC)  Support OK. --C messier 21:47, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Les Diablerets en septembre 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tmv 14:36, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ayer depuis le sud (2024).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:06, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Garda Bordon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:06, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.

Round 2 will end at 28 October 2024, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zinalrothorn, Besso et Ober Gabelhorn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good picture. --Vsatinet 21:16, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ober Gabelhorn depuis Sorebois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good. --Vsatinet 21:16, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ringebu stavkirke from South.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Pierre André ^(talk) 15:33, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Thi (talk) 11:39, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint-Triphon Tower from South-East..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 04:46, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Thi (talk) 11:38, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mönch depuis Niederhorn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vincent Vega 22:01, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mönch and Jungfrau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vincent Vega 22:01, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abondance (2024).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:48, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sorebois en automne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:13, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gare de Monthey.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:39, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 17 November 2024 (UTC)