Welcome to the Commons, Dunkerqueenflandre!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | /−
First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy.

Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

SieBot 09:43, 13 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Paris

edit

Salut! Merci pour la "commande", je m'en occuperai dans peu de temps. A , --SanchoPanzaXXI (talk) 10:58, 4 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Voilà, la commande! [1]. A , --SanchoPanzaXXI (talk) 19:58, 20 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Herb Warszawy

edit

Nie wiem czy dobrze zrozumiałem pytanie ale w latach 1967 - 1990 używano takiego herbu [2] czasami w wersji z koroną [3]. Do 1967 r. teoretycznie obowiązywał herb przedwojenny z 1938 r. (używany również obecnie) ale de facto posługiwano się herbem takim jak w podanych wyżej linkach. Pozdrawiam Poznaniak (talk) 16:30, 24 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

BCN et le petit caporal

edit

Hello, merci pour ta question mais malheureusement je n'ai pas beaucoup d'informations precises à ce sujet. Seulement, je peux t'indiquer qu'après la defaite de l'ami "Pepe Botella", les autorités sous Fernando VII (encore un de ces grandes personages iberiques...) se sont mis à la tache de carrement effacer toute trace de la periode bonapartiste en Espagne avec aparamente, assez de succes. Des nombreux archives ont ete brules, et concernant les armoiries, figure toi que suelement il n'y a reste qu'un unique ecu de Joseph dans une eglise à Valladolid...redecouvert dans les années 1990!. D'autre part, il se peux aussi qu'aucun changement ait ete fait: remarque que si Napoleon renie de la fleur-de-lis, Joseph I reprend sans beaucoup d'hesitation les blasons de tous les anciens royaumes espagnols. En fait, les armoiries de Joseph I sont à l'origine des actuelles armories nationales. Bonne chance, --SanchoPanzaXXI (talk) 18:53, 26 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi! About Barcelona coat of arms, it seems (as much as I have read and searched) that never was changed by the empire. There was a not widely known proposition, coming from Paris for changing coat of arms of all Catalonia, showed in some coins (you can see at: [4]) but it seems they neved arrived to (or was adopted in) Catalonia and there are extremely few of them. During that days most of catalan coins used typical Barcelona coat of arms (few times showing other coats of arms, of other towns), sometimes over cross of St Eulalia (X, patron of Barcelona). Hope it helped! (et pardon, ne parle pas français) . --HansenBCN (talk) 13:05, 30 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
've just seen and looked for info but it seems not probably (also it looks to me the gules area of the Coat of arms of the city). Girona showed great resistence to the Napoleonic forces that tried to capture the relatively small city with 3 sieges (1808-1809) succeeding only the last one. Because of that resistence, Girona's siege was a little bit romantized during the war against the french people (as it was known in Catalan) along with the resistance of other Spanish cities. Well, after that, they had almost all of Catalonia (Tortosa, Tarragona fell in 1811). In 1812 new départements made up in Catalonia were integrated into the empire, but they had only the cities, rural areas showed still all big resistence to the french army during the war. I will continue searching info, but I don't really expect to find the bees is any spanish coat of arms, anyway, it would be an interesting surprise :) --HansenBCN (talk) 09:25, 2 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Tip: Categorizing images

edit

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  /−


Hello, Dunkerqueenflandre!
 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:47, 23 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Re: Blason de chartres sous le 1er Empire

edit

(Sorry for the English). I assume you mean File:Blason ville fr Chartres-Empire.svg? The file was deleted because it had no license. I can restore the image, if Ssire gives an appropriate license.--Nilfanion (talk) 22:28, 13 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Re: Królestwo Kongresowe SVG

edit

Hello, sorry for English, but although I was able to understand your request, my French literally doesn't exist. I have been already working on this coat of arms in its "Great" form - it was the reason why I vectorised Crown of Empress Anna Ivanovna in the first place. Best regards. Avalokitesvara (talk) 16:26, 27 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I will make it gladly, as soon as I finish other stuff. I still haven't finished the Great Arms of Congress Poland:( Avalokitesvara (talk) 16:52, 15 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

  • Hello. The image that you've proposed is indeed prettier, but it uses the modern eagle. The one I used is taken directly from XIXth century Greater Arms of Russian Empire. I have to resolve the bigger problem - the image doesn't display properly:( Avalokitesvara (talk) 13:13, 30 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • Someone else solved the problem for me. It seems that I didn't know Inkscape's possiblities in 100%:) Now, I can draw other requestes. Best regards. Avalokitesvara (talk) 14:39, 3 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
 
  • Hello, I've finally finished the great Coat of Arms of Grand Duchy of Finland. The trickiest part was the Order of St. Andrew that surrounds the middle shield - I had to draw it from scratch, and it took me a few days. Best regards. Avalokitesvara (talk) 14:14, 20 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Re: coat of arms of kingdom of Napoli

edit

Hello. I'm sorry for the late response, but I didn't visit commons for some time, and I wasn't notified about a change in the discussion page by an email for some reason. Anyway, some time has passed since my last bigger work, so I will gladly create this coat of arms. However, some of the charges on the shield in the source image are unrecognisable. Is it possible to find more detailed image of the middle shield? Best regards. Avalokitesvara (talk) 18:40, 17 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

  • Hello I'm still working on the coat of arms of kingdom of Napoli, but due to limited time (I've started a job recently) I can only draw it step by step with little steps. The latest requests are easier, and I've just uploaded them. Best regards. Avalokitesvara (talk) 19:28, 9 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • Hello, I've just uploaded grand arms of kingdom of Napoli, but there seems to be some problem with strange black bar displaying near the mermaid's neck. I've requested help and I hope that some specialist will get rid of it. Best regards. Avalokitesvara (talk) 13:31, 17 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
 
  • Hello. The second one from the latest requests is ready. However, I don't quite understand what is the first request. You need these arms without the mantling and supporters - shield only? Or maybe without the mantling but with supporters? Regards. Avalokitesvara (talk) 16:49, 25 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Arms of Joseph Bonaparte

edit

Hello Dunkerqueenflandre


The Coat of arms of Joseph Bonaparte as King of Spain is based on two written and very reliable sources:


The King didn’t use the bees in the mantle as you can check in these sources.


I’ve moved the work of GJo at File:Arms of Joseph Bonaparte (Napoleonic Mantle).svg because I know it would be used in Napoleonic armorials and It is based on [7] as you've said, but the two mentioned sources are more reliable.


Thanking you for your cooperation.

--Buho07 (talk) 16:29, 22 August 2010 (UTC)Reply


Arms of Julie Clary as Queen Consort of Spain

edit
 

These are the arms of Julie Clary as Spanish Royal Consort. Sorry for being late!

This is a link for your information with the arms of Désirée Clary, the Julie sister, as Queen of Sweden. In Sweden the Queens Consort use their own arms or the arms of the monarch with their own arms in a central Escutcheon, It is strange but that is the rule there.

THE ARMS OF CONSORT QUEENS OF BERNARDOTE DINASTY

Regards --Buho07 (talk) 19:44, 23 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Your last requests

edit

Hello again. I've completed Your last requestes. Best regards Avalokitesvara (talk) 10:07, 10 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Arms of Dunkerque

edit

 
I've seen your requests to Sodacan, and Sodacan has recently created the French dolphin. Is this coat of arms okay? Adelbrecht (talk) 15:45, 7 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

J'ai changé les ailes de l'aigle parce que j'ai lu 'le vol étendu'. Je ne sais pas si ce site est trustable, mais il montre aussi que cette version. Je suppose que je devrais trouver un héraldiste qui le sait.
Je vais travailler sur le blason des Princes Grands dignitaires de l'Empire français bientôt, si je peux trouver de meilleures sources. Pour le blason de Bruxelles, je n'ai pas remarqué l'absence de serpents. Il est également intéressant de noter que le diable est d'or dans cette version. Je vais le refaire à l'avenir, en redessinant certains éléments dans le style Sodacannien. Adelbrecht (talk) 16:32, 22 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

 
C'est la première version. Je dois obtenir de l'aide avec la toque, parce que mes tentatives pour desinner une toque ont échoué. Adelbrecht (talk) 15:01, 12 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your last requests

edit

Hello. I've completed Your last request. Best regards. Avalokitesvara (talk) 12:27, 15 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Pius VII ensigne

edit

Hello! Thank you for your message...I haven't understood what you want I do for the Pius VII ensigne...Can you tell me again please? :) Again thank you! --Gigillo83 (talk) 15:23, 23 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Ok, ensigne modified...Bye! :) --Gigillo83 (talk) 14:12, 24 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Re: Armorial des Princes de l'Empire et des Ducs de l'Empire

edit
 

I'm sorry, I didn't quite understand Your last request:( Could You please explain it more? Avalokitesvara (talk) 14:57, 26 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

I see, it should have Ermine, right? Are the other elements ok?
  • Hello, I've made corrections according to what You said. If everything is ok, I will make the version with green mantle. I must say that all this empty space looks kind of weird to me...

As for Your question about prince Poniatowski Coat of Arms - unfortunately I don't know, but I've asked the author of the first graphics, maybe he will be able to help. Perhaps it will be possible to find these arms in Armorial du Premier Empire? Unofrtunately again, I don't have access to this publication. Best regards. Avalokitesvara (talk) 09:52, 11 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Camillo Borghese

edit

Mes excuses pour la réponse tardive, j'ai été souvent absents et n'ont pas été notifiées à votre demande. Voici votre première demande.
 
Si je peux trouver un fichier source plus clair, je pourrais dessiner ma propre version du dragon. Adelbrecht (talk) 21:15, 9 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

 
J'ai completé votre deuxième demande. Adelbrecht (talk) 19:29, 10 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

 
Adelbrecht (talk) 14:33, 12 April 2011 (UTC) Oui, je viens de remarqué. Ma mise à jour de Blason de Bernadotte l'a aussi. Il n'apparaît pas dans inkscape, et je n'arrive pas à le supprimer. Je vais essayer autre chose, ou obtenir de l'aide de quelqu'un. Adelbrecht (talk) 14:57, 12 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

J'ai finalement trouvé une solution au problème. Les rectangles noirs sont partis. Adelbrecht (talk) 15:36, 12 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Malo-les-Bains

edit

  (Incomplète)
Mes tentatives de dessin des ornements ont échoué. Peut-être vous pouvez trouver quelqu'un d'autre qui est mieux à l'élaboration de telles choses? Pour aider cette personne, j'ai dessiné la base des ornements. Je vais commencer à travailler sur Rosendael bientôt. Cela devrait être possible pour moi, les ornements sont plus simples. Adelbrecht (talk) 08:14, 15 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

En fait, je vis en Belgique, dans la province d'Anvers. Mais c'est aussi un pays bas. :-p Adelbrecht (talk) 09:05, 15 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

J'ai été très occupé ces derniers temps, mais j'ai transféré mon travail actuel pour montrer que je n'ai pas oublié votre demande. Je doit encore ajouter la guirlande et la médaille, et dessiner une bonne couronne. Adelbrecht (talk) 09:51, 19 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

La guirlande et la médaille sont faits. Avez-vous une image qui montre la couronne de façon claire et détaillée? Adelbrecht (talk) 10:15, 25 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Northern Ireland

edit

 
J'ai utilisé une couronne moins détaillées (mais aussi par Sodacan), la couronne complète est à mon avis trop détaillé pour mettre sur le blason. Adelbrecht (talk) 18:07, 2 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Je crains que je ne devrais pas faire ces armoiries. Ils sont strictement protégés par le droit d'auteur, le dessin utilisé sur wikipedia est l'officiel, donc ils préfèrent utiliser cette version.
Je peux faire le drapeau. Adelbrecht (talk) 14:37, 6 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Saint-Pol-sur-Mer

edit

 
Je ne pouvais pas voir clairement les fleurs et ils sont difficiles à dessiner, donc ils ne sont pas vraiment bon. Adelbrecht (talk) 19:25, 13 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Fort-Mardyck

edit

 
Pouvez-vous me dire ce qui est le texte de la devise? Adelbrecht (talk) 13:14, 21 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Joseph Bonaparte Arms

edit

Hello

Thanks for your message, I've used a very reable source, as you can see at the image of infobox. It is a heraldic research that began with the study about a coat of arms of Joseph Bonaparte located in La Rioja (Spain) The problem is the text is in Spanish and there aren't images about it. My work is based on the results of User SanchoPanzaXXI he made three versions of the coat of arms of Joseph and this variant is the most correct. It is common that the artists and heraldist introduce some differences. I know that your are in charge of the French Armoirial. If you need the Version done by User Adelbrecht I can create a new file. I did't this because there are close files with the arms of Joseph but if you need that version call me for it.

Thank you for your advices and links.--Heralder (talk) 17:30, 23 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello again, sorry for being late in my answer, The files uploading takes me a long time. As you can see I´m uploading the arms of Bourbonic Monarchs and the Prince of Asturias. I´m going to upload the arms of the Bourbons infantes and the queens consort so I'll do the Julie arms. I need more info about the children coat as you know in Spain the infantas had a logenze shield with the lesser coat of arms (marshalled castile and león, granada point) (Bourbons) so I need more details about the shield of the Joseph's children.
Best regards--Heralder (talk) 18:23, 25 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

RE: Normandie, Guyenne et Bordeaux

edit

   
Calvados & Seine-Maritime. Adelbrecht (talk) 09:47, 28 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Je suppose que cette requête est terminé? Adelbrecht (talk) 10:52, 1 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
 
Je vais commencer à travailler sur les armoires complets. Adelbrecht (talk) 17:47, 1 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Re: Malo les bains

edit

Hello. I'm terribly sorry for late response, but I haven't visited commons for some time. I use The Commonist for uploading the pictures. Also I had some exams and other real life stuff on my head. But of course I will try to add these exterial ornaments. Best regards. Avalokitesvara (talk) 14:51, 28 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Avalokitesvara has done an amazing job, but why did the lion need to be changed? Adelbrecht (talk) 15:57, 31 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Look, it is the user Ssire who is the problem, not the lion. I had a little problem with him in my earlier days, I changed some things of the French project. Instead of helping me, pointing stuff out, he's been haunting me ever since. I have not replaced any of the existing designs on the French wikipedia, to avoid any conflicts with that user (who lacks knowledge of the most basic concept of wikipedia - assume good faithà. He can tell all the lies he wants about how bad my style is, but I will not let him bully me into changing my designs, and you should not let yourself get bullied either. If he wants the arms in his style, he can draw them himself! If I draw French heraldry, I will draw it in the style I use, the style that Sodacan, Heralder, Katapanomegas and a few others also use.
As long as Ssire remains the boss of the project, and keeps having these temper tantrums, my designs will not be welcome on that wikipedia. So, if you want to update the arms of Dunkerque, I guess you'll have to find someone that is approved by Ssire, to avoid further temper tantrums. I will not refuse any request, but they will not be welcome on the French wikipedia. Adelbrecht (talk) 16:21, 31 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Coat of Arms of Bordeaux

edit

 
J'ai créé cette version avec "France Moderne", comme on le voit dans l'autre blason. Je vais créer une autre version avec France Ancien. Adelbrecht (talk) 09:05, 2 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

 
Version avec France Ancien. Adelbrecht (talk) 09:59, 2 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
Je ne suis pas un bon artiste, alors je me suis basée sur des antilopes que Sodacan a dessiné. (Ici). Il les a représenté comme ça. J'ai les changé un peu pour ressembler plus à l'image. C'est probablement une représentation correcte. Les supporters ont été ajoutées par les Anglais, si je me souviens bien, et je n'ai pas vu beaucoup d'antilopes dans l'héraldique française. J'ai confiance que Sodacan a connaissance dans l'héraldique anglaise, donc je suppose que ce sont correctes. Haha, peut-être qu'ils sont comme des chiens de garde maintenant.  . Adelbrecht (talk) 10:15, 2 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
 
Blason de Bordeaux, aux temps de Richard Cœur de Lion. Adelbrecht (talk) 11:37, 2 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
 
J'ai omis les ornements extérieurs. Le wikipedia français a un modèle pour ces ornements cohérentes. Je vais bientôt l'exporter sur le Wikipedia en anglais. Je suis déjà en traîn de dessiner des ornements cohérentes dans le style de sodacan. (Ici et les essais ici) Je vais bientôt créer ceux de villes impériales. Adelbrecht (talk) 21:08, 3 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Lion des Flandres

edit

Le lion est par Katepanomegas, qui l'a dessiné pour les armes de la Belgique. Cette conception est très bonne pour les lions européenne, parce que le lion anglais est un peu différent. Je vais créer les armes que vous avez demandés lors Katepanomegas a dessiné les supports en ce style. J'ai mis à jour l'autre blason hier. Adelbrecht (talk) 07:16, 18 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

 
Adelbrecht (talk) 10:47, 19 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
File:Coat of Arms of Zeeland.svg
Adelbrecht (talk) 18:10, 21 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dunkerque

edit

 
J'ai fait les corrections aux armes actuelles. (Je vais créer la version de 1917, si vous approuvez ces changements) Pour la main droite, vouliez-vous dire l'épée? Je ne pouvais pas vraiment comprendre, mais j'ai corrigé l'épée dans tous les cas. J'ai aussi changé la corde. Je peux aussi changer le casque si vous voulez. Adelbrecht (talk) 13:27, 25 June 2011 (UTC) J'ai ajouté quelques détails à cette main. Vouliez-vous dire ceci? Adelbrecht (talk) 14:07, 25 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

Armes de Dunkerque - 1917 Adelbrecht (talk) 14:38, 25 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

Armes de Dunkerque - 1919 j'ai corrigé les couleurs pour tous les armes. Adelbrecht (talk) 14:08, 27 June 2011 (UTC) Haha, j'ai téléchargé un mauvais fichier. :-p Adelbrecht (talk) 14:16, 27 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Congo

edit

 
Adelbrecht (talk) 15:32, 25 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Lion...anglais

edit

Je vais laisser ceux à l'origine des créateurs, Katepanomegas a dessiné le lion et Ssolbergj et aussi en traîn de replacer ses lions. J'ai toutes les armoiries de les provinces de la Belgique sur mon 'to-do' liste. Quand je suis fini avec tous les blasons, je vais les montrer à Ssolbergj. Adelbrecht (talk) 13:42, 27 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Coat of Arms of the Kingdom of Italy (1805-1814) et Grandes Armes Impériales (1804-1815)

edit

Mes excuses pour la réponse tardive. J'ai été très occupé, l'école secondaire vient de terminer. Ces tapisseries ne sont pas nécessairement versions correctes des armoiries. Je voudrais pouvoir mettre à jour les armes d'Italie, mais je manque de sources. Les deux images se contredisent.

Pour les armes de Napoléon, il semble contredire la plupart des sources. Adelbrecht (talk) 15:00, 2 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

West-Vlaanderen

edit

 
Il ya encore une version avec de mauvaises couleurs dans le cache, cela va disparaître en quelques heures ou quelques jours. Adelbrecht (talk) 09:39, 4 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

 
Brabant Wallon. Adelbrecht (talk) 11:42, 8 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
 

Vlaams-Brabant. J'ai recherché, et je doit changer le coq au 'Coq hardi'. Le style de la version du drapeau ne correspond pas avec mes motifs héraldiques. Néanmoins je vais essayer de créer quelque chose qui lui ressemble beaucoup. Adelbrecht (talk) 10:15, 11 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Je ne suis pas vraiment Flamingant. J'aime la Flandre, mais pour moi c'est les deux provinces Belges, la Flandre zélandaise et la Flandre française. J'habite dans le marquisat d’Anvers. Haha.

Cela peut être possible. Je manque de sources ou des lois, donc je dois me baser sur des images. Sans des sources, je ne peux jamais savoir avec certitude. Je dois plonger dans les législations françaises de Belgique, peut-être je peux trouver quelque chose. Adelbrecht (talk) 11:23, 11 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

J'ai corrigé, mais comme vous saved, il y ont des problèmes avec les miniatures. J'espère que les changements apparaîtront bientôt. Adelbrecht (talk) 16:40, 11 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Wapen van Noord-Brabant.svg
Brabant-Septentrional. Adelbrecht (talk) 10:01, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Province d'Anvers

edit

 
Je vais aussi créer les anciennes versions. Adelbrecht (talk) 14:39, 18 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

J'ai été très occupé cette semaine. Mes excuses pour la réponse tardive.
 -Royaume des Pays-Bas (1815-1830)
 -20ème siècle
Adelbrecht (talk) 10:16, 24 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Lions Saint Pol sur mer

edit

Je vais attendre jusqu'à ce que Katepanomegas ait mis à jour les blasons des Pays-Bas et Luxembourg.

Pour Saint Pol sur mer, est-ce le blason correct? Blason de la ville de Saint-Pol-sur-Mer (59) nord-France, blason utilisé jusu'aux années 1980 en hommage à l'aviateur Guynemer: D'or à un nuage d'argent posé en barre chargé en chef d'un biplan de la guerre 1914/1918 d'argent et en pointe d'une cigogne au naturel tenant dans son bec une banderole portant le nom GUYNEMER, le nuage accompagné en chef d'un lion de sable armé et lampassé de gueules (=Flandres); à la champagne vairée d'argent et de sinpole chargée de quatre pals d'argent. Adelbrecht (talk) 14:52, 30 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Adelbrecht (talk) 14:14, 2 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
  Dunkerque (17ième siècle) Adelbrecht (talk) 12:57, 4 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Re: Brugge

edit
 

Hello, I will try to create something nice in spare time. Best regards. Avalokitesvara (talk) 07:47, 4 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

  • Hello, unfortunately I was able only to create the charge and the crest so far. I've been quite busy in real life lately. I will make this Coat of Arms of course, but I need more time. Best regards. Avalokitesvara (talk) 10:52, 6 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
    • Hello, I've finally managed to upload this file! I've decided no to use any ready elements and draw it wholly myself. Best regards. Avalokitesvara (talk) 11:25, 19 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
    • Hello, there is certain problem with the lions You want to use. Because we need a lion with his tail between the legs and looking towards us... Avalokitesvara (talk) 17:56, 19 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
    • I see. I suspect that You like the shading of these lions? The main question here is if this image is some sort of official representation? In my country Coats of Arms of cities have their official representations and we try to reflect these representations perfectly. That's why I wanted to create this vector image as close to the original as possible. But if there are no official reprezentations in Belgium, then that's no problem, and I can use the lions You requested. Avalokitesvara (talk) 07:25, 20 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Oostende

edit

 
Adelbrecht (talk) 13:57, 9 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

 
Parce que ces sources montrent les raisins, je l'ai téléchargé dans un fichier séparé. Adelbrecht (talk) 18:14, 17 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Illyrian Provinces

edit

Hi ,I'm quite sure that Illyrian Provinces didn't have coats of arms and cities haven't changed their coats of arms. But if I find something I will tell you.--Nanin7 (talk) 18:21, 28 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

I found this article [8] , it's on slovenian . There is saying that in Illyrian Provinces in use was only French flag and imperial coat of arms.--Nanin7 (talk) 19:15, 28 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Coat of Arms of SR of Croatia

edit

Hi ,I made a SVG version   ,but I did not use wreath from   .I think it's better this way.Cheers--Nanin7 (talk) 14:49, 1 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Yes coat of arms of Zagreb has changed during the communist period as you can see here [9].--Nanin7 (talk) 15:28, 1 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Emblème_armée_russe_2009.PNG

edit
 
File:Emblème_armée_russe_2009.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fry1989 eh? 00:35, 13 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Coudekerque-Branche

edit

 
Est-ce correct?Adelbrecht (talk) 09:20, 13 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Lille

edit

 
Adelbrecht (talk) 12:08, 18 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

CoA of Socialist Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia

edit

Hi. I have made coat of arms of SR BiH  . It will take me a little more time for the coat of arms of SR Serbia, because I have a lot of other obligations , but I will try to finish it this next week. Regards!--Nanin7 (talk) 19:12, 23 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Comte Senateur

edit

 
Mes excuses pour la réponse tardive. J'ai le cheville foulée, et l'université commence la semaine prochaine. Adelbrecht (talk) 08:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

 
Est-ce correct? Adelbrecht (talk) 18:58, 6 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Require

edit

Hi! I'm a little bit confused with your required...I have to do a blason using the "imperial mantle" with the Joachin Murat crown and on the mantle the 2 symbols of Marie Claire? Is it correct? And the mante should be blue and not red...is it correct? Thank you for your answer! :) --Gigillo83 (talk) 20:27, 13 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Et voilà...see if now the emblem is correct...( ).

Bye! --Gigillo83 (talk) 21:14, 13 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Arms of Joseph Bonaparte as King of Spain

edit

Hello, I agree you, the 4th quartes silver or blue were common, but acording *  [10] a doctoral tesis, the correct tincture was gules. There was a discussion about it time before and this is the most perfect version (most peope aren't happy because the tesis is written only Spanish and at many sources the silver/blue quarter is showed but this work is clear the gules quarter is the most correct). On the other hand you are right that the silver/blue were common and usual colours. It was a mistake but this colour was used even with official emblems and badges. For this reason I recommend you that if you want you can upload other file with the variant of the silver or blue quarter. I'm sorry but I'm busy with other type of Spanish arms (Academies, the Armies and Medals) and there are four different variants with the Joseph's arms.

Thanks you Best regards--Heralder (talk) 16:10, 14 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Eugène de Beauharnais

edit

Hello. I believe that I have completed Your last request. Tell me if it is OK. Best regards. Avalokitesvara (talk) 12:58, 28 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Armorial de la Maison Bonaparte

edit

Hi! I have made changes on those two files. Best regards!--Nanin7 (talk) 16:20, 4 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Réponse

edit

Je m'excuse pour la réponse tardive, l'Université prend vraiment beaucoup de mon temps. On a ajouté les 7 étoiles d'or dans le milieu du 19ème siècle, donc ils ne faisaient pas partie des armes napoléoniennes. Je vais commencer avec les armoiries de la Hollande maintenant. Adelbrecht (talk) 08:39, 11 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

 
Je n'aime pas cette version du blason. :-p Adelbrecht (talk) 09:33, 11 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
Je n'aime pas la disposition des ordres, et l'aigle et le manteau ensemble sont trop surchargés. C'est la désign moins bonne du temps napoléonienne, je pense. Adelbrecht (talk) 10:23, 11 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
 
Adelbrecht (talk) 13:18, 12 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
 
Je l'ai téléchargé sur un fichier différent, car c'est amélioré beaucoup. Adelbrecht (talk) 14:32, 12 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
 
Adelbrecht (talk) 14:59, 12 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Julie Clary as wife of Murat

edit

Hello, I've uploaded these arms. Unfortunately I don't quite understand the first part of Your request:( Avalokitesvara (talk) 09:13, 14 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Requests

edit

I have done your requests.

Best regards!--Nanin7 (talk) 17:47, 17 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Napoleonic Heraldry-Spain

edit

Hello!

I'm sorry for being late with my answer to your 1st question. 1st Arms of royal consorts. As you can see I'm really busy with the Spanish Armorial, there are a lot of institutional, academic and regimental coats of arms. For this reason I canot help you with the Bonaparte's Armorial. I'm sorry I'm really interested in the Armorial and you have done a great work congratulations on it, but I'm working in specific Spanish heraldry and direct related subjects (as royal arms variants in Italy).

2nd Question: Napoleonic infantas. It is probable there aren`t references of the heraldry of King Joseph's daughters. The reason is Queen Julie was in France and never arrived at Spain because it was a war area. There are examples of Spanish queens consort arms at the Royal Library but I think there weren't daughters arms because: they never arrived at Spain, they were small (they didn't get books collections and the main examples of consorts and infantes arms are at the Ex-libris and Super-libris), they lost their royal condition in Spain in 1812 and they never been Spanish royal pretenders after this year. But you have a hand with the concept of Atributed arms (in Spain) all Spanish infantas used a lozenge shield (in these cases with the six quarters and the escutcheon of King Joseph without labels because the Spanish Royal House left the differences system between 18th-20th Centuries) and an open crown without arches. So you can get an atributted (without a real use) of the Napoleonic Infantas acording de Spanish heraldry traditions. It's probable these infantas never used a decorations and they were two children at that time so you can use the typical palms becuse it was a fertility symbol of women. So for the external ornaments the most correct option is a ribbon as ornament as single infanta as Margaret of Parma   and Catherine of Cambridge as single woman in Uk (the ribbon with the open royal crown of the Bourbonic Spanish Infantas as I told you). Regards --Heralder (talk) 16:50, 20 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Re: Joachim Murat

edit

Hello. Done! Tell me if You like it. Best regards. Avalokitesvara (talk) 14:23, 29 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Félix Baciocchi

edit

 
Il avait divorcé de sa femme, donc je pense que ceci est le blason avant le divorce. Adelbrecht (talk) 18:39, 29 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

 
Adelbrecht (talk) 19:46, 29 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
 
Louis II Adelbrecht (talk) 17:31, 10 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Ducs de Leuchtenberg

edit

J'ai vu que tu faisais des démarches à propos des ducs de Leuchtenberg. Je suis tombé sur une série d'images qui pourraient t'intéresser :

Reichstadt

edit

J'ai trouvé un autre dessin avec le blason de Chatsam, donc j'ai créé les deux versions:
  
Adelbrecht (talk) 18:24, 16 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Désolé de m'immiscer dans cette conversation sans y avoir été invité, mais Adelbrecht a utilisé des léopards, pas des lions passants. En plus, je crois qu'il y a une erreur dans le second dessin. D'après l'édition de la patente, les armes sont un écu ovale de gueules à deux lions passants tournés vers la dextre, entre lesquels se trouve une burelle d'or, avec le bonnet et le manteau ducal, augmenté de deux griffons de sable et d'or tenant chacun une bannière de guerre aux armes de l'écu comme tenants. (Comte de Petenegg, "Titel und wappen des Herzogs von Reichstatd", in Neues Jahrbuch des Heraldisch-Genealogische Gesellschaft "Adler", 1900, p. 326 : "2. Gestatten Wir demselben die Annahme und Führung eines besonderen Wappens, bestehend aus zwei gegen die rechte Seite über einander schreitenden goldenen Löwen, in einem durch eine schmale goldene Querlinie getheilten rothen, mit dem herzoglichen Hute und Mantel gezierten Oval-Schilde, welchem Wir zur Vermehrung zwei schwarz und goldene Greife mit Feldpanieren, in welchem das herzogliche Wappen wiederholt erscheinet, als Schildhalter beifügen."). Il semblerait donc que les griffons soient les mêmes que ceux des armes du duché/archiduché d'Autriche. Idéalement, il faudrait que quelqu'un aille vérifier là [11], mais ça risque d'être un peu complexe.Katepanomegas (talk) 17:55, 20 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Re: color matching and coats

edit

Hello. I'm very sorry for the dalay. I believe that I have completed Your last request. I think it is a good moment to wish You Joyeux Noël et une Bonne Année :) Avalokitesvara (talk) 12:32, 20 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Eugène de Beauharnais - questions

edit

Y at-il des sources qui prouvent le manteau italien? Et pouvons-nous être certains qu'elle a utilisé la couronne royale dans ce cas? Adelbrecht (talk) 09:40, 21 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Duc de Reichstadt

edit

Hmm, oui, j'ai fait une erreur avec les lions. Je l'ai oublié en copiant le premier dessin.

Donc, nous avons maintenant trois versions différentes du blason.

  1. Cette image, la source de mon premier blason, et le blason original de Chatsam.
  2. Votre source, avec les "griffons de sable, armés, becqués et couronnés d'or"
  3. La source de Katepanomegas, avec les "griffons de sable et d'or".

Votre source, était-il fautive, ou devrais-je faire un troisième dessin ? Adelbrecht (talk) 09:58, 21 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

J'ai peut-être une explication. Le blasonnement du La pourpre et l'exil rappelle fortement celui qui se trouve dans la version française du Guillaume-Isidore Baron de Montbel, Le duc de Reichstadt, Paris, 1832. Dans la version allemande du même livre, Der Herzog von Reichstadt, Leipzig, 1833, on retrouve en revanche les mêmes termes que dans la publication de Pettenegg, notamment les "schwarz und goldene(n) Greife(n)", mentionnés dans de nombreux périodiques juridiques de 1818. La seule traduction du décret de 1818 antérieure à celle Montbel que j'ai trouvée mentionne aussi les griffons à l'autrichienne (dans la continuation de l'art de vérifier les dates, publié en 1824). Je pense donc que Montbel a dû se tromper dans sa traduction et qu'elle a été systématiquement reprise par la suite. A cela, se serait ajoutée une des innombrables erreurs du Siebmacher évoquée par Hervé Pinnoteau, Le chaos français et ses signes, La Roche-Rigault, 1988, p. 197, qui donne pour armes un écu de gueules à la fasce diminuée d'or accompagnée de deux lions passants (représentés sur le dessin du siebmacher par deux léopards) du même, avec les griffons de la maison d'Autriche "d'or, les ailes de sable". Katepanomegas (talk) 01:28, 22 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Elise Bonaparte

edit

Done! Best regards, Avalokitesvara (talk) 12:47, 23 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Parma

edit
 

Adelbrecht (talk) 19:43, 23 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Je vais encore être le facteur de désagrément, mais le collier n'est pas le bon (les maillons devraient être des chrismes, à l'exception de celui auquel est pendu le Saint-Georges qui est une croix fleuronnée de gueules avec un chrisme d'or et les lettres IHSV sur les branches, le tout dans une couronne de lauriers), il y a un problème de calques dans la partie Farnese (les lis passent par dessus le sur le tout) et le quartier de lorraine est erroné (la bande devrait être chargée de trois alérions, pas de trois aigles). Katepanomegas (talk) 18:50, 26 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
J'ai corrigé les alérions et les lis. Concernant l'ordre, il semble avoir eu différents modèles dans l'histoire. Pour le moment, je suis tropoccupé avec l'université, alors je n'ai pas le temps de le changer. En plus, je ne sais pas vraiment quelle conception correspond à cette période de temps spécifique. Adelbrecht (talk) 21:29, 26 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Empereur

edit

Bon, j'ai fini Napo, je le mets sur ce fichier, mais je te charge de la négociation avec spedona. Katepanomegas (talk) 18:50, 26 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Josephine de Beauharnais

edit

Hallo! I've made a Coat of arms of Josephine de Beauharnais. Best regards!--Nanin7 (talk) 16:39, 28 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Re: Princess of Leuchtenberg

edit

Hello. I have done 2) and 2a), but there is some problem with 2b) Which shields do I have to put on the mantle? Should there be two of them, oval-shaped? Avalokitesvara (talk) 11:54, 3 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Coat of Arms of Jean-Baptiste Bernadotte.svg

edit

Bonjour Ludo, (hormis l'armorial du Souvenir) où as-tu vu que Bernadotte avait reçut grand collier de la Légion d'honneur ? Il était grand-croix, c'est sûr, mais après vérif, je n'ai vu nulle part le grand collier. Par contre, au moment du sacre, c'est lui qui (ap)porta le grand collier. As-tu une source fiable ?--Jimmy44 (talk) 06:30, 5 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Martlets

edit

Hello. I will modify the crown of course. Are You sure about the martlets? Im asking, because this Coat of Arms is some sort of "Alliance arms" is it not? In such Coats of arms standard directions of the figures were altered so that heraldic beasts etc. could look like they gazed at each other... Avalokitesvara (talk) 11:26, 10 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Charles le Morny

edit

Hello. Do You want me only to change the birds in small coat of arms or should I create great Coat of Arms with external ornaments? If so, it would be helpful if You could tell me which (if any) existing external ornaments I could use. Avalokitesvara (talk) 12:36, 23 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Coudekerque-Branche 2

edit

Que dois-je faire avec la couleur des lions et la devise? Adelbrecht (talk) 10:04, 1 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Comme ceci? Adelbrecht (talk) 11:32, 1 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Italie

edit

 
Il était très difficile de modifier le fichier d'Katepanomegas. J'ai eu à copier manuellement les éléments.   Adelbrecht (talk) 10:11, 2 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Avez-vous une source qui montre le heaume? Adelbrecht (talk) 15:00, 2 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
File:Coat of Arms Second French Empire (1852–1870) (with helmet).svg Adelbrecht (talk) 16:04, 2 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Pour moi, je doute que le résultat serait bon. Je doute aussi qu'ils font partie de son blason. Il semble être très ornemental, comme dans La salle des Preuses à Pierrefonds. Adelbrecht (talk) 16:16, 2 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Re: Demidov

edit

Hello. It could take some time... Can You tell me what is on the mantling? Are these bees, stars? Also what is on top of the crown? Avalokitesvara (talk) 12:00, 2 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Venise

edit

 
Adelbrecht (talk) 11:40, 3 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Le lion d'Iran, voulez-vous le lion du croix rouge our Emblème d'or de l'Iran? Adelbrecht (talk) 11:59, 3 February 2012 (UTC)Reply


je préfére celui en or...rire merci--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 12:01, 3 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Iran/Perse

edit

File:Heraldic Emblem of Persia (16th century-1907).svg
Adelbrecht (talk) 12:43, 3 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Sceptre

edit

 
Je suppose que c'est pour illustrer un article, donc je recadrée la partie pertinente. Je ne sais pas quel niveau de détail qu'il il a besoin. Adelbrecht (talk) 14:11, 3 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Holland

edit

Il n'y pas de grand collier LH ici: File:HollandKgr2.jpg, file:De twee wapens van het Koninkrijk Holland.jpg => C'est le grand collier de l'Ordre de l'Union. (http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordre_de_l'Union) Adelbrecht (talk) 15:21, 3 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Felice

edit

 
Adelbrecht (talk) 15:52, 3 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

RE: Mise à jour et couronne

edit

Oui, c'est une source intéressante. Mais, je crains que seuls quelques-uns ont été utilisés en héraldique. Pour le moment, je travaille avec les couronnes par Hugo Gerhard Ströhl, et son modèle de couleurs par David Liuzzo. Adelbrecht (talk) 11:31, 6 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Eugenie et Joachim Murat

edit

 
Pour Joachim Murat: l'écu, c'est quel couleur? Adelbrecht (talk) 13:04, 6 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Oui, et je vais ajouter un avertissement dans la description. La même chose pour le heaume emplumé. Adelbrecht (talk) 13:12, 6 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
 
Adelbrecht (talk) 13:32, 6 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
Je les ai arrangées comme des lambrequins, car je n'ai pas vu des cimiers dan l'héraldique napoléonienne. C'est pourquoi j'ai été confondu avec ces plumes. Adelbrecht (talk) 14:01, 6 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
Ce serait un cimier. La source mentionne la couronne comme l'ornement finale, le heaume et la couronne sont mentionnés séparément, donc je pense qu'il serait prudent de le laisser comme ça jusqu'à il y a plus de sources. Adelbrecht (talk) 09:52, 7 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Demidov

edit

 
Adelbrecht (talk) 14:25, 7 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Vlaanderen

edit

J'ai fait des recherches sur le blason. Certains dessins montrez-le avec la couronne, d'autres sans la couronne. Je pense que c'est un blason non-officiel du Westhoek français. Adelbrecht (talk) 11:00, 9 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Louis Bonaparte

edit

 
Je ne vais pas ajouter le Grand Collier. Il y a probablement une raison pour laquelle les deux ordres sont des rubans. Adelbrecht (talk) 10:47, 12 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Couronne

edit

 
Adelbrecht (talk) 20:48, 1 March 2012 (UTC) File:Blason de Carl Ludvig Eugén Bernadotte.svgReply
Adelbrecht (talk) 12:16, 2 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
  Adelbrecht (talk) 13:48, 3 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Charles XIV John (Bernadotte) Prince héritier de Suède 1810/1818

edit

Le lien ne fonctionne pas. Pourriez-vous donner un "lien profond", directement à l'image (un lien qui se termine par .jpg ou .png)? Adelbrecht (talk) 22:12, 10 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Union

edit

 
Je ne vais pas faire l'autre blason. Il est beaucoup de travail supplémentaire sur une nation qui ne m'intéresse pas vraiment. J'ai quelques autres projets qui nécessitent également mon temps. Adelbrecht (talk) 18:06, 25 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Re: Desiree Clary

edit

Hello. I'm sorry, but it will have to wait some more time, as I'm pretty busy right now. Best regards! Avalokitesvara (talk) 06:48, 28 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

[edit] Héraldique ecclésiastique

edit

La mitre est encore officielle. Les dessins avec la tiare ne sont que des voeux pieux. Je pourrais recréer le blason dans le style de Sodacan. Je devrais vraiment continuer les blasons des papes que j'avais commencé avec Paul VI. Adelbrecht (talk) 08:54, 31 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Mardyck

edit

   
Pardonne-moi, j'ai été très occupé. Adelbrecht (talk) 17:32, 10 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Dunkerque 1558

edit

 
Adelbrecht (talk) 11:22, 12 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Lion de Dunkerque

edit

 
J'ai corrigé tous les fichiers. Adelbrecht (talk) 07:59, 28 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Adelbrecht (talk) 08:41, 28 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Jean Bart

edit
 
Arms respectant

   
Et j'ai ajouté l'ordre au fichier de SanglierT. Adelbrecht (talk) 11:05, 28 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Ah oui, je vois, il a été causé par la mise en miroir. Etes-vous sûr que les lions sont officiels? Parce qu'ils n'étaient pas dans la subvention, j'ai supposé qu'ils étaient des ornements pour le tombe. Si elles ne sont pas, de quelle couleur sont-ils? Adelbrecht (talk) 11:55, 28 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
Voila. Il y a un problème de rendu au format 150px pour le moment, mais les autres formats marchent. Adelbrecht (talk) 12:12, 28 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
    • En effet, Le propre position des deux lions dans les arms of alliance est mis en mirroir, ils sont "respectant".

Robert Prummel (talk) 16:38, 27 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  /−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 07:54, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Chevalier de Saint pol.jpg

edit

J'ai demandé la suppression immédiate de ce fichier : pas libre. ----MGuf (d) 08:23, 5 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Bergues

edit

  Adelbrecht (talk) 17:47, 8 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Adelbrecht (talk) 18:08, 8 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Le texte

edit

Ce texte ne parle pas de Bonaparte, mais de Oranje-Nassau. L'année est 1814. Adelbrecht (talk) 15:06, 28 September 2012 (UTC)Reply


Question sur la La Princesse de Leuchtenberg

edit
  • Chèr Dunkerqueenflandre,

La Princesse de Leuchtenberg porte dans sa poitrine l'Ordre de Ste. Élisabeth de Bavière, ("St. Elisabethenorden", cordon bleu et rouge) et "l'Ordre de la Croix étoilée" de la Maison de Habsbourg (Hochadeliger Frauenzimmer-Sternkreuzorden).


Avec mes meilleures salutations,

Robert Prummel (talk) 13:55, 27 October 2012 (UTC)Reply


Joseph Bonaparte

edit

Hello

Thank you for your message, I didn't know the COA of Joseph Bonaparte as Spanish Monarch, it is intesting but I'm really busy. I'll see in other sources as the Royal Library of Spain web if this coat had other uses or it is shown in other representations, in that case I'll do when I've finished the decorations and Spanish Provinces Sections. Best regards --Heralder (talk) 00:49, 22 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Joseph Bonaparte 2

edit

J'ai corrigé la première version, mais mon logiciel se bloque souvent sur la deuxième version. Je suis desolé. Joachim a besoin de beaucoup de travail, beaucoup trop pour moi au moment. Peut-être SanglierT peut vous aider? Il peut utiliser le corne d'abondance que j'ai mis à jour. Adelbrecht (talk) 13:36, 30 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Ordre Royal d'Espagne et la Garde Royale du Royaume de Hollande

edit

Cher Robert,

bonjour, je viens vers une fois de plus pour avoir quelques renseignements s'il vous plait.

1) auriez vous une photo du Collier de l'ordre royal d'Espagne crée par Joseph Bonaparte en 1808.

2) j'ai cherche sur le net mais je ne trouve pas, où puis je trouvé une vue du Drapeau du Régiment de la Garde Royale de Hollande de 1806 à 1808 crée par Louis Bonaparte.

Merci une fois fois de plus de Votre aide, pouvez vous me répondre sur ma page COMMONS s'il vous plait

bonne journée à vous DUNKERQUEENFLANDRE Template:Afz


Chèr Dunkerqueenflandre,

Un des colliers Espagnol est déposé dans la Musée de la Légion d'Honneur à Paris. Photo sur [12]. Le pauvre Lodewijk Napoleon, Koning van Holland, est un sujet négligé dans les Pays-Bas. Toute l'attention est pour notre "premier roi" Guillaume I et l'histoire de la maison d'Orange-Nassau. Mais notre propre premier roi Louis est réévalué par les écrivains modernes. Aujourd'hui l'occupation par les Français (1795 - 1815) et l'histoire de notre collaboration ést le sujet des expositions et publications. Malheureusement l'histoire civique et militaire de Hollande est sous-évalué en faveur de l'histoire des Pays-Bas unifié. Je ne connais pas une publication sur le Régiment de la Garde Royale de Hollande.

Avec mes salutations les plus cordiales,

Robert Prummel (talk) 19:01, 5 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Lemmens, Tom (talk) 09:22, 3 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Blason du Cardinal Baselios Cleemis

edit

Je travaille là-dessus. Le blason est horrible, mais les ornements extérieurs sont amusants. Lemmens, Tom (talk) 17:40, 5 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Lemmens, Tom (talk) 21:35, 5 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Robert de Cassel

edit

Je vais commencer à votre demande. Une question: Folio 80r de l'Armorial de Gelre, cette source mentionne un autre blason. Les ornements extérieurs de votre source sont post-médiévale ainsi. Lemmens, Tom (talk) 11:05, 19 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

 
Je ne sais pas quoi faire avec les blasons des femmes.Lemmens, Tom (talk) 12:33, 20 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
Je ne suis pas très versé dans l'héraldique femelle. Les losanges devrait être correct, mais les ornements extérieurs semblent être les développements ultérieurs. Je ne construire que les losanges, d'accord? :-) Lemmens, Tom (talk) 08:47, 21 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
    Lemmens, Tom (talk) 18:55, 21 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Swedish princesses

edit

Not sure I understand your request, but if it involves extensive editing within Inkscape, then I'm not the best person to do it... AnonMoos (talk) 15:27, 2 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

 



  First one is done I leave you the task of categorizing the file and further expanding the description. Cheers.--Asqueladd (talk) 15:31, 6 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

RE:Crown

edit

Je suis familier avec les tiares. Je les prends en compte en créant des armes papales (cfr. File:Coat of Arms of Pope Paul VI.svg)

Savez-vous si cette couronne est utilisé? La plupart des familles princières utilisent le chapeau ducal. Lemmens, Tom (talk) 10:40, 9 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

RE:Mantle

edit

There you go:  

AceDouble (talk) 00:11, 16 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Crown King and Queen of Norway before 1906

edit

Crown of the King of Norway and Crown of the Queen of Norway have been completed.--Glasshouse (talk) 02:37, 17 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Aide

edit

Je ne suis pas opposé à une modification légère de fichiers, mais comment dois-je faire pour vous transmettre les fichiers modifiés ? Celbusro (talk) 14:00, 22 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Je viens de terminer les modifs demandées. Pour que vous puissiez retrouver les dits fichiers en .svg sur common, veuillez me communiquer pour chaque fichier le nom que je dois lui attribuer, la désignation, ainsi que la catégorie (classement). Cordialement Celbusro (talk) 19:48, 25 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Réponse à l'aide

edit

Bonjour,

Voici les modifications demandées sur les deux blasons, si celles-ci vous conviennent. Pour Oscar Bernadotte :  

Et pour le Prince Carl Johan, duc de délécarlie :  

Ne reste plus qu'à modifier les noms de fichiers et les 're-uploader' sur Commons, a voir également avec les auteurs respectifs des deux blasons. Ce fut avec plaisir, surtout avec un pseudo comme le votre, étant un ancien chti... Amitiés à Sieur Jean Bart...F5JMH (talk) 15:30, 25 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Indented line

Bonjour, Voici les modifs : Dans le doute j'ai modifié le pont afin qu'il apparaisse comme sur le dessin, maintenant au cas ou le dessin ne serait pas juste, celui-ci apparaît comme sur le blason original donc avec une pente. Vous choisirez celui qui vous semble le plus approprié. N'hésitez pas si modifications à apporter sur cet armoirie. F5JMH (talk) 11:49, 29 November 2013 (UTC) User:F5JMH#Modifications_Blasons_et_ArmoiriesReply

Bien sûr si c'est dans mes cordes...

  • Je viens de remplacer le manteau de Karl par le pavillon des pays-bas, jusque là pas de soucis majeurs, par contre pour la suite j'ai quelques points à éclaircir. L'écu doit être remplacé par celui du Swedish_Oscar. OK par contre pour le lion et la couronne des rois de Norvège???

Si vous voulez représenter les armoiries de Charles XIV Jean, les lions en support me semblent corrects dans l'ensemble ainsi que celui du blason (Royaume de Norvège). Les couronnes sont effectivement correcte également. Pourquoi les remplacer ? Je pense que sur le coup je n'ai peut-être pas tout compris... Le pavillon possède une bordure d'hermine ? Faut-il également la représenter ? Amitiés F5JMH (talk) 21:59, 29 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • Bonsoir, Je viens de rentrer du boulot et je découvre votre réponse. Ok je comprend mieux à présent. Bon au fait, mon prénom est Alain ce sera plus simple que les pseudos. Donc pour Pavillon à la place du manteau c'est bon, la partie herminée est en cours, faut que je peaufine un peu et je souhaiterais également alléger quelque peu le poids du fichier (y a du boulot) surtout que tout est sur le même calque (normal) il faut donc séparer certaines parties afin de simplifier le travail. Cela va prendre un peu de temps, rien à voir avec les modifs précédentes. pour la forme du blason, j'avais pris les devants sauf que j'ai travaillé avec le mauvais, je vais donc reprendre cette partie.
  • ps : A noste keer il y a bien longtemps que je n'avais plus entendu cela... Je vous dis quoi.
    • Bonjour Ludo, Les Armoiries sont disponibles grâce au travail de Pichasso et Sodacan, la page de ce dernier étant tout bonnement epoustouflante... User:F5JMH#Modifications_Blasons_et_Armoiries. Reste à lui donner le nom qu'il convient. Amitiés
      • Bonsoir Ludo, Merci pour vos encouragements... Oui effectivement, d’ailleurs j'aurais peut-être du le faire d'argent ou plutôt grise, il apparaît sur les armoiries de l'image que vous aviez fournie. Je ne suis pas expert en héraldique mais il me semble que la partie or qui sépare le tiercé en pairle, du moins dans sa partie inférieure ressemble à une sorte de trompe dont l'embouchure vient effleurer la pointe de l'écu, la partie arrondie semblant se tenir derrière celui-ci. J'ai donc reproduit ceci, mais entre nous, il se peut que soit dans l'erreur et qu'en fait, la partie arrondie de l'embouchure de la pseudo trompe n'existe pas, dans ce cas je ne voit pas ce que cette partie grisâtre représente... Dans tous les cas de figures, s'il faut modifier, je le ferais volontiers, à condition de savoir à quoi cette partie fait référence, je suis curieux de savoir. A y regarder de plus près cela ressemble bien à une trompe. Wait and See... Amitiés F5JMH (talk) 21:18, 2 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
        • Bonsoir Alain, en fait j'ai agrandis l'image et il n'y a rien c'est le demi cercle (au niveau de l'attache jaune) de l'ordre de Charles XIII   qui vient touché le bas du blason qui est aussi le bas en demi cercle et qui forme une sorte de ballon de rugby.

par contre deux petites choses s'il vous plait dans la couronne royale il n'y a pas de couronnes et pourriez faire le contour du blason en or comme sur la source s'il vous plait.

Merci encore de votre aide bonne soirée amitiés Ludo--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 22:02, 2 December 2013 (UTC)Reply


          • Re, OK vu d'ailleurs en fait je m'aperçois qu'il y a 5 colliers d'ordres différents (ça fait beaucoup ça). Vu pour le Collier de l'Ordre de Charles XIII. A part celui figurant déjà sur les armoiries, quels sont les autres ? Autant essayer de les faire tous figurer... Je vois cela dès demain (je suis en repos).
            • Bonsoir Ludo, J'ai fait la mise à jour du fichier en ajoutant les Ordres de l'Etoile Polaire, de Charles XIII ainsi que ceux de Vasa, il ne nous manquera donc que le collier de l'Ordre de l'Epée. Passage du contour de l'écu Or et suppression du ballon de rugby... que j'avais pris pour une trompe :). J'ai également retoucher quelque peu certaines parties et optimisé au maximum afin que le fichier ne soit pas trop lourd. Voilà la suite dès que j'aurais mis la main sur une bonne description du collier qui manque. A bientôt F5JMH (talk) 21:42, 3 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Armoiries du Département de Paris

edit

Salut Dunkerqueenflandre!

Malheureusement je ne connais rien des armoiries de Paris. Mais si je les trouve sur l'internet, je vais te contacter. Cordialement.--Paris 16 (talk) 19:43, 3 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Oscar I et Charles XV de Suède et Norvège

edit

Bonsoir Ludo, question, dois-je remplacer toutes les couronnes par celle de Norvège ? Sur l'écu brochant, c'est bien le corbeau qu'il faut laisser ? Pour le manteau : franges d'or ou hermines ? Dernière question pour les colliers d'ordres, juste le Séraphin ? Si non le travail avance. Bonne soirée. F5JMH (talk) 21:51, 11 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • Bonjour Lodu, je viens de mettre en ligne les armoiries  . Tu me diras si des retouches sont nécessaire. Par ailleurs, le blason du même, côté norvégien, après quelques recherches, je suppose qu'il va être mis, entre autre sur la page de la Maison Bernadotte à côté de celui d'Oscar Ier utilisé en Suède. Sans plus de précisions j'ai fait ceci   en attendant la confirmation. De toute façon je peux toujours le modifier.

Dois-je également faire celui avec l'aigle à la place du corbeau ? Comme dans l'armorial de l' église de Riddarholmen à Stockholm ?

Autre chose, toujours sur la page de la Maison Bernadotte, pour les armoiries de Joseph François Oscar Bernadotte, le blasonnement donne au pairle patté d'or alors que la représentation me fais plutôt penser à un écartelé en sautoir donc petit soucis de blasonnement ou de représentation... On retrouve également le même blasonnement pour Carl Ludvig Eugén Bernadotte... A voir

Voilà, je te souhaite un bon dimanche et à très bientôt, pour de nouvelles aventures... F5JMH (talk) 16:52, 15 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

    • Bonsoir Luso, pas de problème. Merci de ta réponse. Bon pour le blason c'est fait, pas de soucis majeur. La modification des armoiries vont prendre un peu plus de temps. Le fait de superposer les colliers vont m'obliger à les reprendre car le résultat ne me plais pas vraiment, leur courbes sont différentes ce qui pose un problème de superposition, mais ce n'est certes pas insurmontable. Pour la couronne je pensais que tu voulais les deux sur l'écu. Personnellement je préfère avec une seule, dis mois seulement laquelle je met 'Standard' ou 'Norvège' ? Sur les armoiries de Riddarholmen, pour Oscar I c'est bien la couronne de Norvège qui y est représentée on dirait... Et les colliers sont au nombre de cinq : Charles XIII, Vasa, Polaire, Épée et Séraphin mais pas Olaf !!! Dieux que ces Rois sont compliqués, il serait bon, pour mon érudition personnel que tu me fasse un petit cours d'histoire, à ce que je comprend, ou crois comprendre, Oscar I et Charles XV sont la même personne, il change juste de nom suivant qu'il sont Suédois ou Norvégien ? Est-ce bien cela ? Autre remarque, dans ce cas, et s'il est également porteur du collier de l'Ordre d'Olaf, pourquoi n'apparaît-il pas sur ses Armoiries ? Bon ma demande de savoir historique étant close (pour le moment), je me met au travail, mais dis moi en retour si je dois ajouter les autres Colliers, juste pour ne pas reprendre plusieurs fois les mêmes modifs. Pour les Armoiries de Riddarholmen, je les reprend comme elles sont sur la photo, dis moi par contre si tu as le Cri d'Armes que je n'arrive pas à lire. Je mettrais le blason 'Norvège' en ligne dès demain.
    • Pour le blasonnement, ta proposition me semble correct, maintenant je ne suis pas un expert en blasonnement...
    • Pour l'armorial, j'avoue que je n'ai fait que le survoler, mais il me semble très bien, et il y a encore du boulot... Ah la Suède quel beau pays, dommage qu'il n'y ait pas de fricadelles... :). J'ai bien faillis m'y rendre une année avec mon épouse mais cela ne c'est pas fait, peut-être un jour... avec la retraite qui s'annonce... Enfin dans quelque temps. Amitiés Ludo et à bientôt F5JMH (talk) 22:32, 16 December 2013 (UTC) AlainReply
      • Voilà Ludo, les modifications sur les deux armoiries ont été faites, j'ai mis en ligne également celui de Riddarholmen :  . Merci pour les explications historiques, bon j'étais donc dans l'erreur... Je ne me fais pas trop long ce soir... A très bientôt F5JMH (talk) 19:57, 17 December 2013 (UTC) AlainReply
        • Bonsoir Ludo, dis-moi pour Charles XV Riddarholmen, la couronne, standard ou Norvège, sur la photo elle me paraît différente que pour le précédent. Pour le nom du fichier c'est OK sans problème, ici je met : Serafimersköld_Charles_XV_Riddarholmen ? Et si j'ai tout compris, pour Karl Johan je remplace la couronne de l'armorial par celle qui se trouve sur les armoiries (...Crown_Prince_of_sweden...) ? F5JMH (talk) 21:08, 18 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
          • Bonjour Ludo, je met en ligne les armoiries de Riddarholmen pour Charles XV et le Prince Karl Johan avant de partir au boulot... Avec les fêtes j'ai pris quelques petits retards. Amitiés et Joyeux Noël. F5JMH (talk) 08:32, 23 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
          • Merci, voici le premier  . Le deuxième sera pour ce soir, plus de temps...


Chivalric orders armorials

edit

You and F5JMH are doing amazing versions of the Seraphinen Order, congratulations on it.

I thought, an armorial of the knights of an order, it was a good idea but... What's about the other most famous orders, the Garter and the Golden Fleece? So I decided create the armorial of these orders current members. I'm sorry for the Austrian Fleece, there're a lot of membrers These're the results:


Congratulations again and Best regards--Heralder (talk) 00:19, 30 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Aide Blason Jean Baptiste Bernadotte

edit

Bonjour Dunkerqueenflandre, Je ne retrouve plus ton dernier message (et je ne me souviens plus si je t’avais répondu ?) sur le blason de Jean Baptiste Bernadotte en 1810. Je dessine mais ne suis pas expert (je fais pas mal d'erreurs). Aussi je te conseille de t'adresser à Chatsam qui est vraiment adorable et soutient admirablement les dessinateurs ou Ssire qui, lui, est un expert (comme Chatsam du reste). Désolé ! N'hésite surtout pas à me relancer si tu n'a pas de nouvelles (ce qui me surprendrait énormément) je tacherai de t'aider. @ Etxeko (talk) 17:50, 3 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Oscar II de suède et de Norvège

edit

Bonjour Ludo, D'abord bonne année, je crois que c'est le moment. Ensuite je vais reprendre les armoiries, pour Oscar II, les armoiries que tu me livres sont celle de Charles XV si j'ai pigé, Oscar II à les mêmes armoiries que Charles XV avec la devise BRÖDRA FOLKENS VÄL ? Avant 1885 une aigle d'or, à partir de 1885, une aigle de sable avec la constellation. L'ordre de saint Olaf qui d'après ce que je vois est juste sous l'écu apparaît également à partir de 1885 ? La devise azur et lettre d'or. Pour l'aigle de la deuxième représentation dans Serafimersköld, si je m'en tiens à ce que tu m'as enseigné, c'est Gustave V qui rechange l'aigle de sable en aigle d'or et ce en 1908, donc il y a erreur sur celui du Serafimersköld ! Les représentations armoriales sont souvent sujette à discutions, on peu supposer que celle-ci fasse partie du lot. Bien sûr, la seconde hypothèse serait l'inverse, il faudrait peut-être croiser plusieurs sources afin de se faire une opinion. En attendant, je vais réaliser Oscar II avec les deux versions pour le Serafimersköld... Pour ce qui est des armoiries, je m'aperçois en fait que le blason n'est pas le même, en fait si Oscar II à repris les armes de Charles XV, il à repris également celles d'Oscar I. C'est donc un parti-coupé, ensuite il aurait changé en prenant un écartelé aux armes de Suède, plus de gueule au lion norvégien ??? Aller je vais cogiter tout cela et surtout n'hésite pas à me donner plus de renseignements car vraiment ca patauge!!! Amitiés F5JMH (talk) 17:49, 5 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

  • Bonsoir Ludo, je suis sur le point de terminer les armoiries d'Oscar II en 1885, les deux sources sont différentes notamment en ce qui concerne la devise présente sur la première et absente de la deuxième, de plus il semblerais que sur ton second document, la devise ne soit pas correcte, à la suite de l'indépendance de la Norvège, Oscar II aurais pris pour devise : SVERIGES VÄL, après 1905, donc de 1905 à 1907 date de sa mort. Ce qui est d'ailleurs repris sur le Serafimersköld. Donc pour le moment, j'ai représenté les armoiries de 1885 avec la devise BRÖDRA FOLKENS VÄL ainsi que les deux couronnes au dessus de l'écu, l'abîme ayant été modifiée et le collier de l'ordres d'Olaf ajouté, tu me diras en retour si cette représentation te conviens, ne devrait-on pas conserver l'écu ovale comme dans le Serafimersköld ? J'ai également modifié le lion dextre qui sur plusieurs représentations comporte une double queue. Pour ton explication sur l'émail de l'aigle, j'avoue qu'elle me paraît au contraire pleine de bon sens et nous devrions sauf avis contraire nous en tenir à cette version. Pour la représentation des armoiries de 1905, je conserverais bien l'aigle de sable, pour celles du Serafimersköld là par contre j'hésite, je pense que je devrais respecter la représentation réelle quitte à en faire la remarque dans le texte. Bon si tu es ok je met en ligne le premier. A bientôtF5JMH (talk) 19:37, 9 January 2014 (UTC) AlainReply

Crown et Ordres

edit

Bonsoir, Je te répond en vitesse car je viens de voir ton message, pour les ordres oui j'ai également remarqué cela et suis en train de modifier, j'avoue que cela m'arrange bien du reste car les colliers d'ordres sont lourds donc un peu de ménage sera le bien venu. Pour la couronne je vais étudier cela, pourquoi pas. En attendant il me reste les dernières armoiries à réaliser... A F5JMH (talk) 19:07, 11 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

  • Bonjour... Voici la correction des colliers d'ordres ainsi que la mise en ligne de celui-ci :   Oscar II 'Serafimersköld' en 1885, si je ne me trompe pas. Pour la couronne, j'ai préféré garder celles d'origine afin de garder un semblant d'homogénéité dans les représentations successives. Il me reste encore les Armoiries en 1905, qui me donne un peu de fil à retordre pour la devise, ainsi que le 'Serafimersköld' de 1905. Merci pour ton exemple avec Charles XIII, serais-ce le prochain défis que tu me réserve ? Je te souhaite une bonne soirée et vais essayer de mettre les 2 autres en ligne dès ce soir mais pas sûr. F5JMH (talk) 17:16, 13 January 2014 (UTC) AlainReply
    • Voici le dernier... jusqu'au prochain :  . La devise n'est pas équilibré mais je ne vois pas trop comment faire autrement. A bientôt...
      • Juste une question, non deux en fait, Karl XVI Gustaf, c'est l'actuel roi de Suède, il n'est pas chevalier de l'Ordre de Charles XIII ? et c'est Karl ou Carl ? Sur le site "Officiel" c'est Carl. Ensuite j'aurais juste besoin que tu me définisse un peu plus "pourrais tu mettre en dessous les ordres pour Karl Johan et Oscar I". Voilà c'est tout. Je pense pouvoir mettre en ligne les trois Serafimersköld demain ou au plus tard dimanche. Amitiés F5JMH (talk) 21:57, 17 January 2014 (UTC) AlainReply
        • Bonjour Ludo, les différents fichiers sont en ligne à présent. Gustav V :  , Gustav VI Adolf :  , Carl XVI Gustaf :  . Celles de Karl Johan, Oscar I et Charles XV ont été modifiées (pour les colliers) j'espère n'avoir rien oublié, je pense que l'on ne doit pas être loin de la fin... Voilà tu me dis si d'autres modifications sont nécessaires. Pour Carl XVI, j'ai volontairement laissé ses Armoiries sans l'ordre de Charles XIII malgré le fait qu'il soit Chevalier de cet ordre afin de respecter la représentation du Serafimersköld de Riddarholmen. Il faudra je pense le notifier dans le texte. Bon dimanche à toi à très bientôt. F5JMH (talk) 12:28, 19 January 2014 (UTC) AlainReply
          • Oups voilà qui est fait :  . On fait le point, je vais parcourir la page en question et voir si tout est OK dans la mesure de mes connaissances qui sont limitées en ce domaine. Je te laisse le soin de mettre le dernier Séraphin... A le boulot m'attend (ça c'est moins drôle) F5JMH (talk) 07:22, 20 January 2014 (UTC) AlainReply

Le début de la Fin

edit

Wouaou bon ben là y'a du boulot, aller je retrousse mes manches, c'est parti... Juste les armoiries de Dame Louise je suppose... pour celles du Prince Eric... Du gâteau à côté. Je te tiens au courant, enfin je te dis quoi... A bientôt F5JMH (talk) 19:35, 20 January 2014 (UTC).Reply

  • Je reviens de suite car apparemment, les armoiries d'Erik de Suède sont déjà réalisées et présentes dans l'armorial, qu'y a t-il à faire dessus ?   (Cheposo) et   (Sr4747).


    •   pour celui là c'est blanc et non bleu derrière les volcans et il manque les couronnes ds le bonnet de la couronne.

Pour le deuxième il n'est pas uniforme avec les autres princes mis en places


c'est un sacré blason celui de Louise qu'en penses tu ?

merci de ton aide bonne fin de soirée amitiés Ludo--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 22:06, 20 January 2014 (UTC)Reply


re, je suis pas boulanger mais regarde c'est tout frais ça sort du four...rire File:Armoiries du Prince Erik de Suède-Norvège.jpg

Ludo--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 22:13, 20 January 2014 (UTC)Reply


        • Bonsoir Ludo, bon je viens de télécharger les armoiries d'Erik version 1889 :  , si tu as le temps, dit moi en retour si c'est OK. Tu peut je pense l'incorporer dans l'article. Pour Louise, oui là je me suis bien éclaté ce fut très agréable. Voilà, bon la nouvelle est effectivement pas très cool, j’espère cependant que ce ne soit pas trop grave et te souhaite un prompt rétablissement. Je reste de toute façon en attente de nouvelles, en attendant je vais parcourir la page des Bernadotte voir si je trouve quelques coquilles... Amitiés, Alain F5JMH (talk) 21:51, 22 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Au fait il manque Eugénie de Suède.

Suède

edit

Bonsoir Ludo, les modifications des armoiries des deux Princesses de Suède (Louise et Margaret) ont été faites et mise en ligne de celle de la Princesse Eugénie,   que j'ai incorporée dans la page des Bernadottes. Les armoiries d'Oscar II sont également disponibles :  . Voilà pour le moment, je te souhaite une bonne semaine et à bientôt F5JMH (talk) 20:05, 26 January 2014 (UTC) AlainReply

  • Juste afin de te signaler que les deux derniers blasons sont réalisés mais pas en ligne, dis-moi comment tu veux les nommer afin de ne pas faire de blagues, Suède, Danemark etc... Dès que tu m'auras validé les noms des deux fichiers, je les télécharges et on fera les modifications nécessaires. Amitiés F5JMH (talk) 21:41, 30 January 2014 (UTC) AlainReply

Prince de Suède et de Norvège

edit

Bonjour Ludo, Je prend note, pour la Princesse Brigitte, il est déjà en cours de mon côté suivant la même source que la tienne, j'avais pris un peu d'avance... :) Pour le reste je m'y colle dès que possible, je suis en même temps sur les blasons des Barons d'Empire et toujours un peu sur la page 'traquer' !!! A plus et bon repos dominical F5JMH (talk) 12:56, 2 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

  • Bonjour Ludo, Comment va ? Bon je viens de mettre toutes les armoiries demandées :   pour la Princesse Brigitte.   pour le Prince Auguste.   pour le Prince Eugène.   pour le Prince Gustave (Scanie) et   pour le Prince Gustave (Uppland) Voilà, je te souhaite une bonne soirée et à vendredi ou samedi en souhaitant que la semaine fut bonne... F5JMH (talk) 19:31, 5 February 2014 (UTC) AmitiésReply
        • Bonjour Ludo, heureux de voir que tu te portes bien et que tu réintègres les pénates... Bon je viens de faire les corrections demandées en espérant ne pas en avoir oublié. De plus les deux armoiries des Rois de Suède 1908 à 1982 :   et à partir de 1982 :  . Tu trouveras également :   pour Charles Oscar. Il me reste à terminer celui d'Oscar II en Norvège. A bientôt. F5JMH (talk) 12:48, 20 February 2014 (UTC) AlainReply

dernières modifications Maison Bernadotte et création Maison d'Holstein-Gottorp

edit

Bonjour Ludo, Tu me gâtes ... :) Je vois cela dès que possible. Si non j'ai trouvé un Jean Bernadotte, je ne sais pas s'il fait parti de la famille, né le 15 décembre 1754 à Pau ( Basses-Pyrénées ). Titre de baron, accordé par décret du 4 mars 1810. Saint-Cloud (18 août 1810).Armoiries : Coupé, au premier parti à dextre d'or à l'épée en fasce, la pointe à dextre d'azur à senestre des barons membres de collège électoral ; au deuxième d'azur au bouclier d'or chargé en bande d'un sabre d'or dans son fourreau de sable ; pour livrées : les couleurs de l'écu. BB/29/967 ; 1re série. Collations de titres. Registre II. ; SC 2 ; RE C 38. Collation de titres : comtes, barons et chevaliers de l'Empire.. 31 janvier 1810 - 27 septembre 1810. Je n'ai pas vérifié s'il était présent dans l'armorial des barons membres de collège électoral... si j'en trouve d'autres je te fait signe. F5JMH (talk) 12:26, 21 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

    • Bonjour Ludo, Aller je me remets au boulot, suis à la maison en ce moment... Bon pour Lovisa tu veux que je retire quelle couronne, celle qui est sur le sommet du manteau ou celles qui se trouvent sur les écus ? Dans le cas de la première je fais un manteau arrondi ? Je vois la suite en attendant82.253.178.35 08:13, 25 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
      • MARTHA : Pour Martha, dois-je laisser l'Ordre de Saint Olaf ?
      • Est-ce que : Armoiries_de_la_Princesse_Martha_de_Suede_et_Norvege te conviens pour le nom du fichier ?
      • Pour Martha :  
        • CHARLES XIII : Pour Charles XIII, les deux lions situés en chef de l'abîme sont sable ou azur ?
        •     Attention il y a plantouillage sur le dernier, l'écu central n'est pas bon je le modifie dès mon retour...
        • Charles XIII (14-18) à été modifié
        • Mise en ligne du Prince Charles de Suède (Serafimersköld) : 
            • PRINCE HERITIER :
            • Est-ce que : Armoiries_du_Prince_Heritier_Gustave_de_Suede te conviens pour le nom du fichier ? Oui moi aussi je suis un peu perdu... c'est celui-là :  


Bon après celui-là je marque une pause, serais de retour dans l'après-midi (manger et repos car je suis en arrêt maladie...). Merci pour tes encouragements mais tu fais bien plus de boulot que moi sur le sujet... A tout à l'heure F5JMH (talk) 12:00, 25 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Re Ludo, bon je crois qu'on arrive au bout. Mouai le coup du KOMITER, j'avais FOLKETS au dessus des yeux alors j'ai mis un K, bon c'est pas grave, ça change du C. Aller je modifie, cela m'apprendra à pas vérifier 15 fois ce que je fais, mais il y a tellement de trucs à vérifier dans ce genre de boulot qu'on oublie souvent les plus flagrants... :) Si non oui ça va, un coup haut un coup bas, juste un fusible, je me suis retrouvé sur le carreau au boulot il y a quinze jours et j'ai encore 3 semaines d'arrêt. Je vais pouvoir finir l'armorial des barons à se train là... Bon à par cela j'ai une autre question pour toi : Pour les armoiries du Prince Charles de Suède, duc de Södermanland, que dois-je faire figurer comme colliers ? Juste le Séraphin ou également l'Epée et la Polaire ? Dis moi si je me trompe mais je pense que c'est le dernier non ? A tout à l'heure. F5JMH (talk) 19:40, 25 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Oups j'ai oublié autre chose, pendant que j'y suis ne devrais-je pas remplacer la couronne du   par celle qui se trouve sur les armoiries des Princes ?

KOMITER transformé en COMITER. Quand j'y repense c'est Komique comme erreur... Pour le dernier c'est bien ce qu'il me semblait en regardant de plus près. Est-ce que : Armoiries_du_Prince_Heritier_Gustave_de_Suede te conviens pour le nom du fichier ? Je le met en ligne.F5JMH (talk) 20:42, 25 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Prince Héritier Gustave :  .

Prince Charles :  . Couronne du Prince héritier Gustave modifiée.

Prince Charles-Auguste :  en avance... Vérifie la couronne par contre je ne suis pas sur.

Parfait, Bienvenue donc à la Princesse Madeleine... Attendons le titre. Pour les ancres oui, moi aussi j'aime la Marine mais elles y sont sur les armoiries donc, c'est avec plaisir que les ait rajoutées... Ça fait tout de suite plus classe je te l'accorde...

 
Mes excuses, j'ai été très occupé. Lemmens, Tom (talk) 11:39, 3 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Maison d'Holstein-Gottorp

edit

Salut Ludo, Heureux de te lire. Oui je prend quelque repos et souhaite que tu vas pour le mieux... J'avance l'armorial des barons d'Empire :)... Il faut s'occuper donc pour répondre à ta question oui je pense avoir le temps bien sur. Par contre il va falloir que je fasse un sérieux tri, je viens de m'apercevoir que tu avais laissé du boulot, le message date de fin février et je ne l'ai pas vu... Méa Culpa. Aller je regarde cela de près et au boulot pour la suite, envoi le blason... F5JMH (talk) 18:54, 6 March 2014 (UTC) AlainReply

  • Bonjour, les armoiries du Prince Charles vont faire un superbe ajout à l'Armorial. J'ai choisi de reproduire celui qui se trouve sur le document papier, plus chronologiquement vraisemblable de part sa forme et également son originalité. Maintenant, je peux aussi l'inclure dans un manteau avec tout le reste mais je me demande si cela était pratiqué à l'époque ? Bref tu me dis quoi. Je devrais pouvoir le mettre en ligne ce matin, dès que les dernières retouches auront été faites. Je regarde pour les autres.F5JMH (talk) 08:37, 7 March 2014 (UTC) AlainReply
  • Questions : Pour Gustave IV Adolphe, tu me met pour exemple Frederik I or sur celui-ci je ne vois que trois colliers, est-ce la même chose pour Gustave ? - Autre chose, d'où sources-tu ton blasonnement ? Car je vois qu'il y a quelques différences par rapport à ce que l'on fait d'habitude comme par exemple les lions qui sont armés de gueules (Danemark et Schleswig), de même que le cavalier (Ditmarsie) qui est, apparemment entièrement argent ici. Bon c'est tatillons mais intéressant. Voilà c'est tout pour le moment... Amitiés
  • Mise en ligne :   Reine Hedwige-Élisabeth et   Gustave IV Adolphe Suède et Finlande Riddarholmen. Pour le Prince Charles cela donne ça :  . A bientôt pour la suite.
    • Suivant :   Gustave IV (Armoiries). Ok pour les différences donc je les gommes, pas de soucis. Euh par contre pour le mail, je l'active depuis où, Wikimédia Commons, Wikipédia ? C'est vrai que se serait peut-être plus pratique pour échanger... Je prépare en même temps sur la Maison Vasa, enfin juste les blasons (on ne sait jamais... ils seront fait comme cela). Tu me dis sur quoi j'active le mail et on roule.F5JMH (talk) 13:14, 7 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
    • Modification Gustave IV faites, le mail est ok, du moins je pense. Mise en ligne de   Reine Frédérique de Suède et Finlande (1797-1809).
        • Bonsoir, voilà les deux blasons :   pour la suèdoise et :  . Pour la modif des armoiries, je te remercie car je ne l'avais point vu, je devrais suivre ce que je fait !!!. Bonne nuit et à binetôt.F5JMH (talk) 22:32, 8 March 2014 (UTC) AlainReply
          • Bonsoir Ludo, Je viens de remettre les versions des différentes armoiries modifiées par notre amis. J'en ai récupéré un car je veux le décortiquer un peu, certaines chose m’intéresse... Pour le reste j'ai vu que tu as répondu à mon mail, je vais y répondre. A bientôt F5JMH (talk) 19:16, 10 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
            • Bonjour Ludo, voici les dernières mises en ligne :   Serafimersköld Prince Charles Gustave 1802-1805   Gustave III Riddarholmen. Pour VASA :

  Duc Jean Vasa (après-1560) et   Duc Jean Vasa (avant-1560). Plus :   Gustave (de Vasa) Prince héritier Suède 1799 à 1809 sur lequel il y a une double rangée de perles sur le haut de la couronne qu'il faut que je corrige. Voilà comme d'habitude tu me dis si modification à faire. Amitiés F5JMH (talk) 14:20, 13 March 2014 (UTC) AlainReply

Maison VASA

edit

Franchement je pencherais pour une sirène, le seul hic est que je n'ai rien trouvé pour le moment pour confirmer cette hypothèse...

A propos j'ai trouvé cela, je ne sais pas si ça peut être utile :  .

Norwegian flags

edit

TRAJAN 117 (talk) 06:14, 21 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Princesse Leonore de Suède.jpg

edit

Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  /−


 
A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Princesse Leonore de Suède.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial ( ), No derivative works ( ), or All Rights Reserved ( ), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as   (CC BY),     (CC BY-SA),   (CC0) and   (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Denniss (talk) 13:32, 31 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit
bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  /−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Emmanuel Dewees.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 20:14, 7 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Karl Knutsson et autres

edit

Bonjour Ludo, Je viens de mettre en ligne les deux armoiries :   pour Karl Knutsson et   pour Jean (sans rien d'autre que l'écu et la couronne... Voilà, a bientôt F5JMH (talk) 19:28, 9 April 2014 (UTC) AlainReply

Petites modifs

edit

Bonsoir Ludo,

Les modifs sont ok :   -   et  . Bonne soirée, ou plutôt bonne journée pour demain. A F5JMH (talk) 20:33, 13 April 2014 (UTC) AlainReply

Couronnes

edit

  Lemmens, Tom (talk) 12:52, 15 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

 
Hello, Dunkerqueenflandre. You have new messages at Ellin Beltz's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  /−

File:Claude Prouvoyeur.jpg

edit
 
File:Claude Prouvoyeur.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:56, 23 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Princesse Sibylle de Suède.jpg

edit
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  /−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Princesse Sibylle de Suède.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Princesse Sibylle de Suède.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:56, 23 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Prince Bertil de Suède, duc de Halland.JPG

edit
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  /−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Prince Bertil de Suède, duc de Halland.JPG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Prince Bertil de Suède, duc de Halland.JPG]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:56, 23 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Princesse Marguerite de Suède.jpg

edit
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  /−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Princesse Marguerite de Suède.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Princesse Marguerite de Suède.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:57, 23 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Dano-suédoise

edit

Bonjour Ludo, ... Alors on ne cite pas ces sources ???... Bon modification des deux blasons OK et Frederik I ici :  . Il me reste la pépite... A F5JMH (talk) 14:49, 26 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

  • Bonjour, Dis moi j'ai perdu le lien d'importation des fichiers sur Common, saurais-tu comment le récupérer ? Merci et à bientôt
Salut Ludo, Ok pas de problème, j'ai trouvé en passant par Wikipédia mais c'est moins pratique... Ah ben c'est revenu, donc je n'ai rien dit...
Euh, c'est pas gagné. L'image originale n'est pas clair déjà au départ, je suis dessus. Je t’envoie le fichier et ce que j'en pense...

Austro-Spanish Queen of Denmark

edit

Hello I´ll draw the arms of the Danish Queen. Even I remember there is a sculped colors arms so we can get a real arms not atributed.--Heralder (talk) 13:49, 13 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit
bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  /−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Logo centenaire de Malo-les-bains en 1991.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:56, 22 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Katarina av Sachsen-Lauenburg.jpg

edit
العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  /−
 
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Katarina av Sachsen-Lauenburg.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:57, 22 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Cô Pinard II Tambour-major de Dunkerque.jpg

edit
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  /−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Cô Pinard II Tambour-major de Dunkerque.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Cô Pinard II Tambour-major de Dunkerque.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:58, 22 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Albert Mahieu (1864-1943).jpg

edit
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Albert Mahieu (1864-1943).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Albert Mahieu (1864-1943).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

太刻薄 (talk) 15:09, 7 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Maria Pavlovna (Princess of Sweden)'s coat of arms

edit

No, the 1st glance in Russian web gives nothing. But I'll keep looking during my Romanovs' future searches. --Shakko (talk) 10:19, 16 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Eugenia de Montijo.

edit

Excuse-moi! Je ne suis pas en l'héraldique de la noblesse espagnole. Et je préfère écrire en français. Mon anglais et mon français sont très pauvres. Excuse-moi! Sur le blason de Eugenia à première vue, j'identifie plusieurs divisions:

-De gauche à droite, de haut en bas:

3ème: Petit blason de Casa de Medinaceli
6ème: Portocarrero
9ème: Petit blason de Casa de Medina Sidonia
11ème: Fonseca
15ème: Acuña

Ce je voi dans le blason. Pour l'instant je ne vois rien de plus. --Parair (talk) 16:01, 17 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Je vous en remercie beaucoup par vos mots mais je ne sais rien. Je ai continué:

2ème: Casa de Palafox, Marquisat de Ariza..
5ème: Marquisat de Ardales de la Maison de Guzman, comment le blason de Medina Sidonia avec hermine. Mais la partie supérieur je ne sais pas.
7ème: Blason de Comtesse de Tebas et Baños. (Je pense par Fernández de Córdova)
8ème: dessous, c'est le roi maure Boabdil enchaîné. (Je pense par Fernández de Córdova)
10ème:Je crois que la première partie est le blason de Zuñiga
13ème: Casa de Cabrera, Marquisat de Moya. (Je crois)
Dernièr: Casa de Tellez-Girón

Cordialement--Parair (talk) 21:32, 17 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Paul Asseman Maire de Dunkerque.jpg

edit
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Paul Asseman Maire de Dunkerque.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

太刻薄 (talk) 13:43, 30 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit
bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  /−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Prinsessan Leonore 1 år foto Brigitte Grenfeldt Kungahuset.se .jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

D Y O L F 77[Talk] 21:00, 20 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Prinsessan Leonore 1 år foto Brigitte Grenfeldt Kungahuset.se .jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:24, 21 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Princesse héritière Mary de Danemark.jpg

edit

Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  /−


 
A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Princesse héritière Mary de Danemark.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial ( ), No derivative works ( ), or All Rights Reserved ( ), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as   (CC BY),     (CC BY-SA),   (CC0) and   (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Ww2censor (talk) 22:19, 13 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Princesse héritière Mary de Danemark.jpg

edit
 
File:Princesse héritière Mary de Danemark.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Amitie 10g (talk) 00:10, 14 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Savoy Coronets

edit

Give me a minute, please. --Heralder (talk) 11:40, 19 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

I`ve corrected file:Italian Crown of Heir apparent.svg (It shown a mistake the Crown of Savoy-Aosta Princes). Thanks--Heralder (talk) 12:10, 19 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
You too, and congratulations on your Scandinavian armorials--Heralder (talk) 14:29, 19 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Arms source?

edit

Hello! May I ask what your source is for these arms? --SergeWoodzing (talk) 13:14, 2 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Gustave Trolle

edit

Bonjour excusez moi de vous déranger pourriez vous me rendre un petit service s'il vous plait.

Pourriez vous réaliser le blason de Gustave Trolle Archevêque d'Uppsala de 1515 à 1517 puis de 1520 à 1521

(sans l'ange au dessus s'il vous plait).

  • le blason de l'archevêque d'Uppsala :  

pourriez vous ajouter les ornements de l'archevêque s'il vous plait  

Merci d'avance pour votre aide, bonne journée à vous

Cordialement--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 08:24, 12 August 2016 (UTC)Reply


bonjour, si je comprend bien, il faut que je mette le blason de l'archevêque d'Uppsala dans l'ornement vert, c'est bien ca? (Spax89 (talk) 18:46, 14 August 2016 (UTC))Reply
Je mets quel titre?
voila File:Coat of arms of Gustav Trolle.svg je te laisse mettre les descriptions appropriées ( (talk) 19:52, 15 August 2016 (UTC))Reply


Bonsoir, et merci beaucoup c'est parfait, bonne soiré à vous

Merci encore

Cordialement--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 20:12, 15 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Royal monogram

edit

Dear Dunkerqueenflandre. I see that you have returned my removal of a category on this file. It is not her monogram, it is a mistake, as you can read in the periodical Bogvennen, vol. 3, 1947. It belongs to Marie Charlotte von Schleswig-Holstein-Augustenburg, her brother Christian August has an almost identical monogram. Yours sincerely, Orphée (talk) 14:20, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Prince Ulrich de Danemark (1578-1624).jpg

edit
 
File:Prince Ulrich de Danemark (1578-1624).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

LX (talk, contribs) 17:28, 18 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Georges-Jean de Palatinat-Veldenz.jpg

edit
 
File:Georges-Jean de Palatinat-Veldenz.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

LX (talk, contribs) 17:34, 18 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Albert Denvers.JPG

edit
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Albert Denvers.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Albert Denvers.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

LX (talk, contribs) 17:34, 18 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Claude Prouvoyeur.JPG

edit
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Claude Prouvoyeur.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Claude Prouvoyeur.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

LX (talk, contribs) 17:35, 18 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Paul Machy.jpg

edit
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Paul Machy.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

LX (talk, contribs) 17:35, 18 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Charles Valentin.jpg

edit
 
File:Charles Valentin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

LX (talk, contribs) 17:37, 18 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Logo centenaire de Malo-les-bains en 1991.png

edit
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Logo centenaire de Malo-les-bains en 1991.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Logo centenaire de Malo-les-bains en 1991.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

LX (talk, contribs) 17:37, 18 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Charles Valentin.jpg

edit
 
File:Charles Valentin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

LX (talk, contribs) 10:24, 28 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Chirac

edit

OK Best regards--Heralder (talk) 18:23, 18 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Christian Hutin.jpg

edit
 
File:Christian Hutin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:40, 15 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Claude Nicolet.jpg

edit
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Claude Nicolet.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Claude Nicolet.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Smooth O (talk) 11:05, 30 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Yohann Duval.jpg

edit
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Yohann Duval.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Yohann Duval.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Smooth O (talk) 11:05, 30 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Christian Hutin.jpg

edit
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Christian Hutin.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Christian Hutin.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Tyseria (d) 21:35, 12 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Manque d'autorisations

edit

Bonjour, je suis désolée mais j'ai du signaler vos derniers importes. Les fichiers en question sont sous licence Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0. Cette licence est trop restrictive pour Commons. Une liste des licences Creative Commons admissibles ou non sur ce site, qui peut vous être utile. J'espère pour vous que vos autres imports sont dans les clous :) Tyseria (d) 17:47, 21 November 2020 (UTC) Reply

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Christian Hutin.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Christian Hutin.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Tyseria (d) 17:43, 21 November 2020 (UTC) Reply

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Tracte (RPR) pour les législatives du 21 mars 1993 dans la 12e circonscription du Nord (Dunkerque).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Tracte (RPR) pour les législatives du 21 mars 1993 dans la 12e circonscription du Nord (Dunkerque).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Tyseria (d) 17:43, 21 November 2020 (UTC) Reply

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Philippe Eymery.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Philippe Eymery.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Tyseria (d) 17:48, 21 November 2020 (UTC) Reply

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Robert Lenoir (Dunkerque).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Robert Lenoir (Dunkerque).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Tyseria (d) 17:48, 21 November 2020 (UTC) Reply

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Tracte pour les législatives du 5 juin 1988 dans la 13e circonscription du Nord (Dunkerque).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Tracte pour les législatives du 5 juin 1988 dans la 13e circonscription du Nord (Dunkerque).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Tyseria (d) 17:48, 21 November 2020 (UTC) Reply

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Tracte (FN) pour les législatives du 21 mars 1993 dans la 12e circonscription du Nord (Dunkerque).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Tracte (FN) pour les législatives du 21 mars 1993 dans la 12e circonscription du Nord (Dunkerque).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Tyseria (d) 17:48, 21 November 2020 (UTC) Reply

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Tracte (Parti Communiste) pour les législatives du 14 juin 1981 dans la 11e circonscription du Nord (Dunkerque).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Tracte (Parti Communiste) pour les législatives du 14 juin 1981 dans la 11e circonscription du Nord (Dunkerque).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Tyseria (d) 17:49, 21 November 2020 (UTC) Reply

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Jacques Michon.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Tyseria (d) 17:49, 21 November 2020 (UTC) Reply

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Pierre-Etienne Vanpouille.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Pierre-Etienne Vanpouille.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Tyseria (d) 17:50, 21 November 2020 (UTC) Reply

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Tracte (Parti Ecologiste) pour les législatives du 14 juin 1981 dans la 11e circonscription du Nord (Dunkerque).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Tracte (Parti Ecologiste) pour les législatives du 14 juin 1981 dans la 11e circonscription du Nord (Dunkerque).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Tyseria (d) 17:50, 21 November 2020 (UTC) Reply

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Dominique Martin.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Dominique Martin.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Tyseria (d) 17:50, 21 November 2020 (UTC) Reply

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Tracte pour les législatives du 14 juin 1981 dans la 11e circonscription du Nord (Dunkerque).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Tracte pour les législatives du 14 juin 1981 dans la 11e circonscription du Nord (Dunkerque).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Tyseria (d) 17:59, 21 November 2020 (UTC) Reply

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Tracte pour les législatives du 4 mars 1973 dans la 11e circonscription du Nord (Dunkerque).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Tracte pour les législatives du 4 mars 1973 dans la 11e circonscription du Nord (Dunkerque).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Tyseria (d) 17:59, 21 November 2020 (UTC) Reply

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Tracte pour les législatives du 28 mars 1993 dans la 13e circonscription du Nord (Dunkerque).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Tracte pour les législatives du 28 mars 1993 dans la 13e circonscription du Nord (Dunkerque).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Tyseria (d) 17:59, 21 November 2020 (UTC) Reply

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Louis Dewerdt.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Louis Dewerdt.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Tyseria (d) 17:59, 21 November 2020 (UTC) Reply

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:André Delattre.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:André Delattre.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Tyseria (d) 17:59, 21 November 2020 (UTC) Reply

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Guy Lecluse.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Guy Lecluse.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Tyseria (d) 17:59, 21 November 2020 (UTC) Reply

File:José Kiecken.jpg was recently deleted

edit

File:José Kiecken.jpg was recently deleted by Fitindia for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.

Reason for deletion: No permission since 21 November 2020

It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 06:59, 29 November 2020 (UTC)Reply


File:Christine Decodts 2022 (cropped).png

edit
Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Christine Decodts 2022 (cropped).png. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  ไทย  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−

--Gyrostat (talk) 10:59, 27 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Affichage électoral elections legislatives 13e circoncription du Nord (Ens RN).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

King of ♥ 17:06, 27 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Patrice Vergriete.jpg

edit
 
File:Patrice Vergriete.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gyrostat (talk) 22:39, 20 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Avertissement

edit

Bonjour,

J'ai commencé à faire le tri dans vos photos car il y a malheureusement beaucoup de violations de droit d'auteur. Je vous suggère de n'importer que des photos qui vous appartiennent tant que vous ne maitrisez pas les règles du droit d'auteur. Pyb (talk) 17:00, 21 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

edit
 
2022 Picture of the Year: Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo), Little Egret (Egretta garzetta) and Gadwall (Mareca strepera) in Nepal.

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

edit
 

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.


Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:14, 16 October 2024 (UTC)Reply