Wikimedia Commons

User talk:Coentor/2

< User talk:Coentor
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Themightyquill in topic File:2013 Exposició - 13.jpeg

Re:

edit
Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

Sí, puedo... pero tú también :-)

En My preferences, ve a Gadgets y ahí activa el primer gadget de 'Tools for categories'. Con eso tú mismo podrás hacer los traslados que quieras, que por otra parte son razonables. --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 14:30, 6 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Lo que has hecho ha sido retirar la categoría :-P
Voy a ver si desfago el entuerto :-)
Un saludo --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 15:42, 6 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Creo que ya está. --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 15:51, 6 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Fresh Hare

edit
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hola Coentor, ahí me pillas en fuera de juego. Para temas de copyright yo he hablado algunas veces con User:Moonriddengirl, pero su área de actuación es la wikipedia en inglés, así que no sé si podrá ayudarse. En cualquier caso, creo que los argumentos que usas deberían ser suficientes para solicitar la reversión del borrado. Sé que no te ayudo mucho, pero es que no sé cómo :-( --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 18:00, 7 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Fresh Hare title.JPG

edit
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Me alegro de que tuvieras razón y parezca que va a ser restaurado. Un saludo --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 15:09, 12 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Holiday greetings

edit
 
Wishing you the happiest of holidays
and the best new year!
— Vera (talk), December 2012

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ Nederlands ∙ /−

 

Gates...

edit
Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Bueno, para que te hagas una idea, aquí aparece en su contexto. No sé si eso en catalán es un 'portal' o no. Lo dejo a tu conocimiento del idioma :-) --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 11:46, 20 December 2012 (UTC) PD: felices fiestasReply

Acepto tu criterio :-P --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 20:27, 20 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

LaVeuPV

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Hola Coentor, me temo que los chicos de La Veu no lo tienen muy claro. Aquí dicen otra cosa. ¿Los conoces? ¿Puedes pedirles que lo aclaren? Gracias --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 15:26, 16 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Vamos a hacer una cosa. Voy a borrar los ficheros y, si consigues que cambien la licencia, los restauro. Los listo aquí para que luego sea sencillo restaurarlos:
Lo siento :-( --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 07:36, 18 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Plantà Gozalbo Altea 2013 (1).jpeg

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Coentor, where (country) has this photo been shot? --Túrelio (talk) 21:23, 13 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 17 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Commons Android App

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello! Thanks for using the Commons App beta, hope you are finding it useful :) We just pushed out an update with multiple file uploads - so you can select many number of pictures from your gallery (press and hold to select one, then tap to select multiple) and share to commons. There is UI which makes this easier, and looking at the nature of your uploads, you will probably find this useful! :) Also on Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Coentor you mentioned: " If Android Commons Was better, the files could have been automatically been properly licensed.". Can you tell me what exactly you meant? What should we be doing to make things easier?

Also, if you can think of any new features that'll help make your life easier, do let us/me know! We'll be happy to implement :) And if you aren't, you should also subscribe to mobile-l mailing list, we post updates about new releases (we try to do one every Monday) there. We're also on IRC at #wikimedia-mobile, so poke us! Thanks! Yuvipanda (talk) 20:37, 20 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

File name issues and Licensing on the app

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

The file namine issue (with the '.') has been fixed, but retries will still fail (you will have to upload them again, sorry!). And as for FOP licensing - I'm unsure how to easily add that on a mobile device, considering the vast array of options available and the limited screen sizes. I have filed a bug to track this, so your comments on that would be highly welcome! Yuvipanda (talk) 11:42, 21 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

We're adding categories. It should be out next week (ideally) or at worst the week after that. Do try multiple uploads :) Thanks for the patience! Yuvipanda (talk) 11:46, 21 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Multiple uploads

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

The way to do multiple uploads is to: 1. Open the Gallery app in your phone directly (not via the Commons app) 2. Tap and hold to engage multiple select mode 3. Tap to select all your images 4. Find the 'Share' option, and share to Commons.

It doesn't work with 'pick from gallery' in the menu bar, due to a technical limitation in Android. I'm looking at solutions for this. Yuvipanda (talk) 13:04, 21 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Ow! I just fixed the User:null issue. Do you think this is serious enough to issue an update immediately, or can it wait till Monday? Also if you'd like an updated version, I can make you an apk to install immediately. Thanks! Yuvipanda (talk) 16:04, 21 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
I just pushed out an update for User:null issue, since that'll need to be cleaned up manually on commons later (and hence bad). Google Play should auto-update you in a while. Thanks! Yuvipanda (talk) 17:36, 21 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Cremà

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Hola Coentor, espero que no te importe que te hable en español, mi valenciano está bastante oxidado. Acabo de ver el cambio de nombre que has propuesto para la categoría sobre la cremà ¿en que sentido está mal escrito el término? Popularmente es como se conoce, aunque no esté normalizado, al igual que plantà, mascletà o fideuà... Un saludo. Lobo (howl?) 00:50, 27 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Voy a mover los mensajes a la discusión de la categoría, para que siga estando localizable dentro de un tiempo. Lobo (howl?) 10:05, 27 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Naming bugs in Android Commons app

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago4 comments1 person in discussion

Hello! Can you tell me the exact titles you used that caused them to get stuck? Thanks! Yuvipanda (talk) 09:44, 27 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Looking into it! Can you tell me if they are stuck as 'failed' or as 'queued'? Thanks! Yuvipanda (talk) 15:17, 27 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
I've filed [1] to track it. Can you re-upload with the same name once again, just to check? It'll help me narrow down the problem. Thanks! Yuvipanda (talk) 15:49, 27 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
Uh weird. I'll investigate more. Are you able to upload other images in the meantime? Yuvipanda (talk) 16:54, 27 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Commons android app now does categorization

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

Hello! We've added categorization support! For both single and multiple uploads! Check it out! :) Yuvipanda (talk) 19:29, 2 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

I've filed the uncategorized template on bugzilla to help track it. Will be fixed soon! How is the UI? Is it fast and understandable? Yuvipanda (talk) 21:59, 2 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
Yes, it is 'eventual' update - it waits for a little bit and then updates them. Yuvipanda (talk) 22:11, 2 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Spirit 43 - Scrooge - Oncle Picsou - Garrepa.JPG

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Spirit 43 - Scrooge - Oncle Picsou - Garrepa.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Kaldari (talk) 22:17, 5 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 17:47, 8 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Gracias

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Por cierto, no has categorizado las fotos de Benifaió. Lo iba a hacer yo, pero no sé de qué Benifaió se trata. Un saludo --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 21:44, 8 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Category:The_New_Spirit

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

The New Spirit has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ /−

SethAllen623 (talk) 18:34, 10 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

No haga el vandalismo en wikipedia del japonés

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

No haga el vandalismo en wikipedia del japonés! Soy estudioso del lingüística. Yo conosco gente que vive en las zonas bilingúes habla castellano, Cataluña, Galicia, Euskadi, Islas Baleares, todavía no encuentro valencianos y todavía no he estado en Comunidad valenciana, hablé con ellos, y ellos hablan los castellanos propias tierras con acento de su tierra, esos son dialecto catalán del castellano, dialecto gallego del castellano, dialecto vasco del castellano, dialecto balear del castellano, usted también habla castellano, no? Es un dialecto de su propia tierra del castellano. No haga vandalismo! --202.126.28.162 13:07, 12 April 2013 (UTC) Escribí arriba yo, no he olvidado ingresar. --Xapones (talk) 13:14, 12 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

De acuerdo por razón de información incorrecta, pero en el artículo de Dialecto aragonés del idioma castelleno en japonés no ponga mapa de Los idiomas en España, es no necesaria, ese mapa solamente están puesto de los nombres. Además, ese tipo de mapa normalmente daría impresión a muchos japoneses que en las zonas de no castellano no hablaría castellano. Quiero que se haga un mapa de los dialectos del idioma castellano con información correcta pronto. Pero porque en las páginas en español todavía está puesta esa mapa? --Xapones (talk) 08:22, 14 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Tengo una pregunta

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Tengo una pregunta. Usted es de Velencia, no? nativo de la lengua valenciana, no? En la Wikipedia en japonés existe la página de "Muixeranga", es tradición de Valencia, verdad? Quería saber cómo pronuncia en valenciano, porque tengo duda el título actual japonés en la escritura japonesa. Puede escribir Alfabeto Fonético Internacional? Si puede hacerlo, enséñame, por favor! Pronunciación de valencià, no de català, por favor! --Xapones (talk) 04:38, 14 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Muchas gracias. Yo sé el sistema básico de la fonética del catalán porque aprendía el catalán, pero no puedo hablar, también sé lo que el valenciano se pronuncia poco diferente al catalán estándar (habla de Barcelona, no?). Las cosas relacionadas de Valencia, toponimia, antroponimia, tradición...etc. creo que se respeta la pronunciación valenciana. El idioma oficial de la comunidad valenciana es el valenciano. En Japón se publicaron unos libros de la gramática catalana, entonces puedo imaginar como pronuncia en el catalán, pero no existe él del valenciano. Muchas gracias! --Xapones (talk) 10:56, 18 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Joan Baldoví i Roda.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Joan Baldoví i Roda.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Andy Dingley (talk) 19:47, 27 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Marxa per l'Autodeterminació del P.V. 8.10.1978 2.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

He modificat l'explicació de la fotografia perquè el lloc es troba al barri de Camí Reial, de fet es l'extrem nord d'aquest. Es la baixada que passava per sota de les vies. Sant Marcel·li comença en passar les vies. Mentre que Camí Reial és un barri centenari, Sant Marcel·lí té una història que encara que molt interessant és breu en el temps. Si coneixes a Vicent, l'autor de la foto, en que he perdut el contacte, té fotos molt insteressants de llocs poc coneguts o fins i tot perduts. Molt agraït per aquestes imatges. B25es (talk) 18:27, 29 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Messi - 2012 European Match Day Against Hunger.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
 
File:Messi - 2012 European Match Day Against Hunger.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Ytoyoda (talk) 13:56, 21 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

The following files are listed as well:
The "editorial use only" stipulation means these images are not free enough for Commons, which must allow for non-editorial use as well. --Ytoyoda (talk) 14:09, 21 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Museu Faller

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hola, fa un temps vaig anar al Museu Faller i encara tinc algunes fotos per pujar, però tinc dubtes sobre si els ninots tenen algun tipus de dret, ja que en aquest cas no són monuments efímers. Què faig, les puge i au?

Una altra pregunta, saps com s'escriu correctament Montolivet? En l'article en castellà diu (Mont-Olivet en valenciano) però en valencià l'article és ca:Montolivet (barri de València). Ho dic perquè vaig apofitar per a fer fotos de l'església i tenia pensat carregar-les com Església de la Mare de Déu de Mont-Olivet com posa a l'article, però després em va sorgir el dubte.

Moltes gràcies --Joanbanjo (talk) 16:42, 22 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Commons App troubles

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Hello! Apologies for the late response, I've been on vacation / busy otherwise for a while. We fixed the multiple upload bug, should make a release in a day or so. Does the 'freezing' bug still happen? Yuvipanda (talk) 16:03, 16 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Pushed out an update for the crash, try again now? Thanks! Yuvipanda (talk) 21:05, 16 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:2013 Exposició - 13.jpeg

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago10 comments4 people in discussion
 
File:2013 Exposició - 13.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

91.66.56.175 13:38, 29 July 2013 (UTC)Reply


This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Category:Crema (falles)

edit

I misunderstood the discussion and moved Category:La cremà to Category:Crema (falles). Before I just revert my edit, I'd like to discuss what can/should be done with both categories, which should be merged. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:57, 17 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Comment After some googleing, I've not found any article about the use of one or other term, but its obvious that both are used.--Coentor (talk) 21:13, 18 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
Can we have a little bit more input? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:06, 4 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
Both terms are in use, and even "crema" seems to be lingüistically more accurate, "cremà" also seems to be more used. After googleing in "fallas.com" (offical website of the JCF, the organisation who makes the festival maybe We should take "cremà" as the good one, because its more common. Maybe if a good reliable source appears argumentating why "crema" is more accurate than "cremà" We should consider the change. Notice (in the google link) that "L'Antiga" (the old one[of Campanar, a neighbourhood in Valencia]) used crema in 2011 but cremà in 2012. So, both terms are interchangeable.--Coentor (talk) 23:13, 4 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
So what do we do? Which one will be the redirect? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:38, 4 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
IMO, undo the renaming to "la cremà", close the discussion, and re-open it only if someone gives us some source explaining why "crema" is prefered to "cremà" by linguists. I'll if I find it. Until sources are not showed, "cremà" seems to have more use, so it should be prefered. Thanks, and sorry if I demanded for a renaming without searching for sources before.--Coentor (talk) 09:23, 5 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
No harm done, Coentor! :) To make sure I get it right: Move everything to Category:La cremà and make Category:Crema (falles) a redirect to La cremà? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:18, 6 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Yes. I believe it's better.--Coentor (talk) 09:20, 6 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Resolved by discussion in September 2013. Category:Crema (falles) redirected. - Themightyquill (talk) 16:13, 8 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Oriol Romeu i Moussa Dembele.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Oriol Romeu i Moussa Dembele.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Martin H. (talk) 13:01, 25 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Category:Sociologists_of_the_Land_of_Valencia

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Sociologists of the Land of Valencia has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ /−

Tecnoxarxa (talk) 00:01, 18 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

العربية ∙ català ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ română ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ українська ∙ /−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Coentor,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
  


العربية | català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | magyar | Nederlands | polski | svenska | ไทย | /−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Coentor,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
  

Category:The_New_Spirit

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

The New Spirit has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ /−

Dinosaur918 (talk) 13:50, 23 December 2013 (UTC)Reply


File:Kempes VCF - Maradona Arg. sub 20 (1979).GIF

edit
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Kempes VCF - Maradona Arg. sub 20 (1979).GIF has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Fma12 (talk) 20:40, 31 December 2013 (UTC)Reply


File:Kempes VCF-2.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Kempes VCF-2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Fma12 (talk) 20:42, 31 December 2013 (UTC)Reply


File:Kempes VCF - Gráfico 3071 - 1978.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Kempes VCF - Gráfico 3071 - 1978.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Fma12 (talk) 20:44, 31 December 2013 (UTC)Reply


File:Kempes portada Goles 1543 25-7-78.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Kempes portada Goles 1543 25-7-78.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Fma12 (talk) 22:14, 7 January 2014 (UTC)Reply


File:Kempes VCF.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Kempes VCF.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Fma12 (talk) 22:16, 7 January 2014 (UTC)Reply


File:Bust Regí Mas.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Coentor, is this bust installed indoors or outdoors? Could you add the name of the sculptor to the description. --Túrelio (talk) 16:06, 2 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Ana Peleteiro en 2012.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Ana Peleteiro en 2012.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Elisardojm (talk) 17:52, 25 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ /−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Montes 1926.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

/St1995 14:53, 30 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ /−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Montes anys 20.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

/St1995 14:53, 30 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Barça Fanzone 2014 - 6.jpeg

edit
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Barça Fanzone 2014 - 6.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Jespinos (talk) 15:38, 18 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Trinquet

edit
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hola, una pregunteta, com anomenaries la categoria per al Trinquet de Pelayo al commons? Trinquet de Pelayo simplement? --Joanbanjo (talk) 19:23, 1 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely Эlcobbola talk 16:41, 31 July 2014 (UTC)Reply


File:Plaques a Stansted - 2.jpeg

edit
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Plaques a Stansted - 2.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Wdwd (talk) 19:45, 3 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Francesc de Paula Burguera.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Francesc de Paula Burguera.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:25, 24 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Re:Desfazer entuertos

edit
Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

Hola. La veritat és que no se com es demana. Mai no m'he trobat amb eixa necessitat. Jo puc reanomenar, tu tens el permís de filemover? --Millars (talk) 11:48, 21 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

És un permís per a poder reanomenar les pàgines. Sino no es pot. Es troba a Commons:File renaming. --Millars (talk) 12:11, 21 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
Amb eixe permís pots reanomenar pàgines, però de forma individual, com el traslladar o moure de la Viquipèdia. --Millars (talk) 22:49, 25 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Barceló-Oltra-Abril.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Barceló-Oltra-Abril.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Ww2censor (talk) 23:13, 14 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Estellés

edit
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Un gran poeta. A vore si un dia em passe amb una càmera i faig les fotografies com déu mana. Salutacions cordials :) Ferbr1 (talk) 22:26, 20 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:La nostra terra com a referent de l'economia de baix a dalt, per al bé comú.webm

edit
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:La nostra terra com a referent de l'economia de baix a dalt, per al bé comú.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 22:16, 19 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 22:24, 19 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Coentor/2&oldid=146746268"
Return to the user page of "Coentor/2".