Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Brakeet!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 16:28, 18 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Autopatrol given

edit
 

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:34, 23 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

"Captured" aircraft

edit

Hi Brakeet, The Vampire, Venom, MiG-15 and Hawker Hunter in the IAF museum are not captured aircraft. They were acquired elsewhere and were only painted to resemble Arab aircraft. I removed them from the relevant category. Poliocretes (talk) 17:53, 10 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks , and sorry for my misunderstanding. --Brakeet (talk) 18:01, 10 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Remerciements / Category:50e anniversaire du film La Grande Vadrouille à Meursault - Exposition de véhicules militaires

edit

Bonjour, je voulais vous remercier pour le travail que vous avez effectué pour la catégorisation des véhicules militaires que je n'avais pas identifiés. Cordialement. François de Dijon (talk) 21:35, 26 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

edit
  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

edit

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

File:Ise Mie Okage Yokocho 14.jpg

edit
 
File:Ise Mie Okage Yokocho 14.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Batholith (talk) 10:08, 2 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Category:CROWS_II_(RWS)

edit
 

CROWS II (RWS) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Geo Swan (talk) 12:56, 20 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Type 1 gun tank Ho-I

edit

Hi: here is another you may wish to make into a separate cat for the IJA AFV. There are two uploaded photos; it was the prototype for the Type 2 Gun tank Ho-I. Kierzek (talk) 18:27, 11 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi: Thank you for the notice, Kierzek. best regards.--Brakeet (talk) 03:21, 12 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category:Firearms_by_calibre

edit
 

Firearms by calibre has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Sanandros (talk) 07:49, 16 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

IRA SR series experimental amphibious tanks

edit

Category:Amphibious tanks has the SR series experimental tanks of the Imperial Japanese Army program included. I was thinking maybe the SR I, SR II and SR III should have their own category. BTW, there is not suppose to be a dash between SR and the number, but I only learned that later after I had already uploaded two of the photos. What do you think? Cheers, Kierzek (talk) 15:15, 22 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the notice, Kierzek. At this time I dont have detailed knowledges about SR series amphibious tanks, (for example, differences in SR-II and SR-Ro. etc). dash between SR and the number, I think you may not have to worry about, thanks--Brakeet (talk) 03:16, 24 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
I just thought it might be good to have a general Cat for Japanese Amphibious tanks, at this time. Not individual Cats for each model. Cheers, Kierzek (talk) 16:09, 28 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category:Sonderkraftfahrzeug_111

edit
 

Sonderkraftfahrzeug 111 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Josh (talk) 07:32, 20 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category:Flakpanzer_V_Coelian

edit
 

Flakpanzer V Coelian has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Josh (talk) 02:00, 21 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

SpaceX Falcon rocket family

edit

Hello Brakeet. Regarding Category:SpaceX Falcon rocket family, would you object to me changing this to Category:Falcon (rocket) (currently a redirect) to match the naming scheme of the other rocket family categories? Huntster (t @ c) 21:00, 28 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thanks you Huntster, I agree with you. best regards.--Brakeet (talk) 01:44, 29 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Community Insights Survey

edit

RMaung (WMF) 01:13, 10 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

edit

RMaung (WMF) 15:23, 20 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:Tojinbo 2010 02.jpg

edit
 
File:Tojinbo 2010 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Batholith (talk) 09:56, 24 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

edit

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category:ARL_V_39

edit
 

Category:ARL_V_39 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Rots61 (talk) 21:30, 12 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Regarding the ongoing disbanding of all interwar and post-WW2 categories of AFVs etc.

edit

Please note that two users recently reached a "consensus" to disband the top-level category Military vehicles of the interwar period and decided that it gives them a right to disband all the subcategories without further discussion, and moreover to disband categories like Post-World War II tanks of the Soviet Union. You may state your opinion on that at COM:ANU#CfD scope? (Military vehicles of the interwar period) and COM:Categories for discussion/2020/01/Category:Interwar tanks in museums. Ain92 (talk) 14:26, 13 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

CfD: College athletics programs

edit

Hi, I have started a discussion to rename a large collection of categories, one or more of which you may have created or edited. Please see the discussion thread at Commons:Categories for discussion/2020/04/College athletics programs for details. Thanks, IagoQnsi (talk) 04:42, 24 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Chikubu Island DSCN2001.jpg

edit
 
File:Chikubu Island DSCN2001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Batholith (talk) 11:17, 28 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Chikubu Island DSCN2000.jpg

edit
 
File:Chikubu Island DSCN2000.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Batholith (talk) 11:18, 28 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Chikubu Island DSCN1994.jpg

edit
 
File:Chikubu Island DSCN1994.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Batholith (talk) 11:19, 28 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Sonderkraftfahrzeug_181

edit
 

Sonderkraftfahrzeug 181 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Josh (talk) 00:11, 29 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:21, 14 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Tanks as subcategories of turret

edit

Hello, I have seen that you included the tanks in the category of their turrets and guns (for instance Category:APX-R turret and Category:Hotchkiss H-35 tanks. I would rather disagree, since some versions of the tanks do not have turrets or guns. What are your reasons to categorize the way you did?--Le Petit Chat (talk) 08:16, 24 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm sorry to be late. First, My mother tongue isn't English, I'm not good. If there is impoliteness, please permit.

the reasons to categorize the way I did,

  • One, The users makes the picture easy to find.
  • Two, It may be a little different case, some self-propelled artillery category have main-gun category as parent category,Equally, the mainstream models of Hotchkiss H-35/38/39 tanks and Renault R35 tanks have APX-R turret, so, I did.

I think,the user's advantage convenience, is most important, so I think the way to link between the categories by a different way (for example, cat see also) is also good.

P.S. I made japanese version of APX turret article, ja:APX砲塔, based on your french article, I'll be thankful.

best regards.--Brakeet (talk) 03:00, 27 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for you answer. --Le Petit Chat (talk) 12:33, 27 November 2021 (UTC)Reply


Category:LRDG Chevrolet at IWM

edit

Palosirkka (talk) 10:28, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Goshohachimangu-kyoto-010.jpg

edit
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Goshohachimangu-kyoto-010.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Andel (talk) 16:55, 17 April 2024 (UTC)Reply