Blast furnace chip worker

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Blast furnace chip worker!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- 15:22, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

ლუდის ზიანი

გოგა Goga123321 (talk) 11:11, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

ლუდი

1 ლუდი ისმხება ბოლოსკენ შევიწროვებად ბაკალში ან ჭიქაში, რომელიც დამზადებულია შუშისგან ან რამე სხვა მატერიისგან, ოღონდ არა მეტალის და პლასტმასის ჭურჭელში. ჭურჭლის მოცულობა 1 ინგლისური პინტის = 0.568245 ლიტრს (მიახლოებით 0,6 ლიტრს). - დაიმახსვორეთ ეს არის ლუდის მიღების დღიური ნორმა. 2 ლუდის ოპტიმალური ტემპერატურა არის 6-8 გრადუსი ცელსიუსით. (ეს მიახლოებით შეესატყვისება მაცივრის ყველაზე ქვედა დაფის ტემპერატურას.) თუ თქვენ გააცივებთ ლუდს მოცემულ ტემერატურაზე მეტად, მაშინ ის კარგავს თავის გემოს, შემდეგ თუ ისევ დაუბრუნდება თავის ოპტიმალურ გრადუსს მაშინ ისევ აღდგება გემო. იმ შემთხვევაში თუ 10 გრადუსზე მეტ სითბოში ამყოფებთ ლუდს - მისი არომატი და გემო იკარგება სამუდამოდ. არ შეიძლება ლუდის უცებ გაცივება ან შეთბობა. 3 ლუდი ისხმება ჭიქის შუაში 2,5 სმ სიმღლიდან. ველოდებით სანამ ქაფი გადავა, შემდეგ კი ვამატებთ ლუდს და ვავსებთ ჭიქის 3/4 მდე. ქაფი უნდა იყოს სრულიად თეთრი, სმეტანის კონსისტენციის ოღონდ ბუშტუკების გარეშე. მათ ვისაც არ მოსოწონს ლუდის ქაფი, ამ შემთხვევაში გირჩევთ დააწვინოთ კათხა, და ნელა ჩამოასხათ სასურველი რაოდენობით. ამ ხერხით ჭიქაში თითქმის არ იქნება ქაფი. 4 გადავიდეთ ყველაზე მთავარ პროცესსზე - ლუდის დალევაზე. ლუდს არ სვამენ ერთი "მოყუდებით" როგორც ეს არის მეტნაკლებად პოპულარული. არც მთელი საღამო მისი სმა არის რეკომენდირებული. ლუდის სმის ხელოვნება გამოიხატება იმაში, რომ მიიღოთ დააგემოვნოთ ის სწორად და მაქსიმალური სიამოვნება - ამისათვის კი საჭიროა კათხის დაცლა 3 მოსმით. ეს ხდება შემდეგნაირად: პირველ ჯერზე სვამთ ნახევარ ბაკალს. მეორე მოსმაზე კი სვამთ დარჩენილის ნახევარს. ხოლო მესამეზე ბოლომდე ცლით სასმისს. ეს არის იდეალური დღიური ნორმა ლუდის სმის. 5 თუ იკითხავთ მისაყოლებელზე, როგორც ჩვენთან ეძახიან "ზაკუსკა" : ჩეხები - ლუდის მცოდნებიი და ექსპერტები, არასდროს აყოლებენ მას არც ჩიპსებს და არც სუხარს. მხოლოდ ვიჩინას და შემწვარ ღორს. გერმანელები - შებოლილი კომბოსტო და სოსისი. ჩვენ არ ვართ არც გერმანელები და არც ჩეხები ასე, რომ შეგვიძლია ლუდს მივაყოლოთ შებოლილი ან დამარილებული თევზი, ასევე მწვადი, ასევე მოხარშული თევზი. სხვადასხვა შებოლილი ხორცეულიც. ძალან გემრიელია თუ ლუდს მიაყოლებთ კრაბის ხორცს. Goga123321 (talk) 11:15, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Category names

Hello!

I noticed you have created some categories about steel industry. I have renamed some.

I want to share whith you some points about the vocabulary. I have many problems when creating a category in Commons because English language is really fuzzy ; at the opposite, French is very accurate.

There is a general confusion in English about what are ironworks, steelworks and steel mill. When creating Commons categories, you named the Dunkirk steel industry as a steel mill, although pictures show blast furnaces. You named the Florange industry as an ironworks, although the one picture shows the aciérie, which means a steel mill.

I started a discussion in the English wiki to point out this problem. I proposed tho be more restrictive to be accurate :

• still mill (or steel shop) → french: fr:Aciérie → is the shop which produces blooms, billets or slabs. It is composed with converters, ladle metallurgy and continuous castig machines
• steelworks (or siderurgy) → french: Usine sidérurgique → is the complete industry (coke ovens, su=inter plant, BF, converters, casting mahines, rolling mills, coating lines, etc.)
• ironworks → french: forges → is the old way to produce iron and steel, before the invention of the Bessemer converter. It deals with puddling of fining processes.

I hope you share this, or you have any comment if I do some mistakes.

Borvan53 (talk) 18:21, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

I answered on your talk page. Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 20:23, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Luxembourg map — Карта Люксембургу.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Luxembourg map — Карта Люксембургу.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:12, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Iron ore sinter for blast furnace

Hello,

could you add some translations to Category:Iron ore sinter ?

Borvan53 (talk) 14:14, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

@Borvan53 Which kind of translation? If you mean "Aggloméré" then I have done. Ukrainian name of the "Aggloméré" by the way is the same - "агломерат" which is pronounced as [aglomerat]. Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 14:12, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Blast furnace chip worker. You have new messages at Lewis Hulbert's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Bedlam Furnaces 03.jpg

And also:

• File:Bedlam Furnaces 02.jpg

Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 18:06, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Blast Furnace Inn - Stained glass window in Discovery Museum.jpg

File:Blast Furnace Inn - Stained glass window in Discovery Museum.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 00:13, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Category:Electric blast furnaces

Please enjoy ! Borvan53 (talk) 21:56, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

@Borvan53: Yeah, thank you very much. But if you mean exoticism and unexpectedness of an electric blast furnace, then excuse me, dear Borvan, but I'm not surprised at this. I have already seen this kind of furnaces. For me it's not a surprise already. But, nevertheless, I really enjoy the proposed illustrations, in particular because so far I have seen only the drawings of this kind of furnaces but I see the photo of this kind of furnaces for the first time. By the way, maybe you already know, but I will note that there were several types of electric blast furnaces and as I understand not only in Sweden [1].

By the way, I would like to offer you something exotic too - a blast furnace with a hearth on wheels File:Відсувне горно доменної печі — Detachable blast furnace hearth.jpg. Have you ever seen anything like this? I do not know how it worked and I do not know if it was realized in practice because now I do not have the full text of the book from which this illustration was taken. But idea was to use detachable blast furnaces hearths as a method of combating against overheating of the hearth and against hearth or wall accretions. As noted in the book, the blowing off of the furnace was not needed in this case. The illustration was taking from russian book of 1903 but I am sure it is from the west. Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 08:01, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

I was wondering if I you knew that kind of blast furnace.

About the detachable hearth, I knew it was pretty common on cupolas : see File:Drop bottom cupola.jpg. In this case, the idea was to have a quick and easy way to empty the cupola, for a short (somme days or weeks) stoppage. But I had no idea of example of use with blast furnaces. Thanks !

File:Hollway converting furnace.png was an "evolved" idea, in which the hearth was designed to be used as a converter. Borvan53 (talk) 12:42, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

@Borvan53: I noted above that I do not have the full text of the book from which this illustration was taken. Well, for now I’ve got the full text of the book, concerning the above-mentioned detachable blast furnace hearth. And I would like with your permission to finish the story of this type of hearths.

In the book it is saied that the design of these hearths was proposed by engineer Frölich and a small elliptical charcoal blast furnace, wich was smelting ferromanganese and had a retractable hearth situated on a cart, was worked at the Nizhny Tagil ironworks, Nizhny Tagil, the Urals, Russian imperia for many years. The whole hearth G (both lower and upper) until the bosh level, after taking off the nozzles S, can be lowered down by jacks D and can be set on the cart T. A new hearth, wich is placed on the enother cart of the same kind, was moving along the same rails r and pushed out the first cart, spoiled herth, without stopping the furnace run. Then a new hearth is placed to its place, the same jacks D raise the new hearth and press it to the bosh. The new hearth before the setting must be preheated and filled with charcoal, of course, in order to avoid the cooling of the furnace. Later, Luhrmann took advantage of the idea of Frölich and developed his own system of a retractable hearth, but this kind of hearths did not get spread, because they are not applicable to large furnaces wich are operating at high temperatures.

The above-mentioned engineer Frölich (russian spelling Фрёлих or Фрелих) is a Karl Frölich, foreign engineer who was born in Germany or more precisely — in Prussia. Later he moved to Muscovy. It should be noted that most of the engineers at the plants of the Russian Empire were foreign people. Karl Frölich was locally a famous man in the 19 centure in Ural.

The above-mentioned Luhrmann or Lührmann is, as I believe, more or less famous F. Luhrmann who invented a slag tuyere.

The above-mentioned elliptical blast furnace is a type of blast furnaces wich had an elliptical cross-section. It is said that this type of blast furnaces was invented by Rachette (uk:Рашет Володимир Карлович), who was an ingener and minister in russian mining department and, by the way, he was of french origin. But in Stahl und eisen, 18 mai 1910, page 818 it is said that Rachette designed blast furnaces just of oblong cross-section and rounded corners and Frölich was that one who exactly designed an elliptical cross-section blast furnace.

I am sorry for my English and for such a long and possibly useless text, but I just wanted to reveal the story of that detachable hearths. Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 14:47, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Hey ! Your English is pretty good, I think I underestimated you

Just about these detachable hearths : why did they were designed ? To allow a quick stopppage of the furnace, like in the cupola ?

And thank you for all these interesting links ! Borvan53 (talk) 19:26, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

@Borvan53: No, they were designed not for a quick stoppage of the furnace in meaning "arrêt de la marche du fourneau".

They were designed to avoid the blowing out blast furnace in case if there are problems with its hearth. Those problems are 1) the high overheating of the hearth, which leads to deterioration or defective condition and eventually to the destruction of the hearth and 2) hearth accretion caused by incorrect blast-furnace run. In both cases, it is necessary to blow out the blast furnace for the repair of hearth. So, the detachable or mobile hearths were invented with the aim of replacing the spoiled hearth with a new one without blowing out of the blast furnace. Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 17:17, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Chains of pig iron casting machine pictures

Wow ! Beautiful and highly useful ! Borvan53 (talk) 19:31, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Thank you. Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 17:19, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

File:BE077062 - 9275158801.jpg

File:BE077062 - 9275158801.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: COM:LL of news photo of 1952 fire Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Eureka Lott 20:37, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Flannery Island

No, sorry, what you see is what you get. I've otherwise never seen it, as it's hard to view from the nearby bridge (I was a passenger in a tall vehicle; from my car, you couldn't see over the bridge railing), it's nowhere near any other roads, and I've never been on a boat nearby. Nyttend (talk) 01:26, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Cast iron cannons

Hi! You add photos of cast iron cannonballs into Cast iron cannons category. But this category is itended for cannons, cannons are not cannonballs. You can create Category:Cast iron cannoballs to categorize these files. Лапоть (talk) 17:34, 17 February 2020 (UTC).

File:Cascade Locks Park...Towpath Trail.jpg

File:Cascade Locks Park...Towpath Trail.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 21:54, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Gorge Metro Park...Cuyahoga River Valley.jpg

Copyright status: File:Gorge Metro Park...Cuyahoga River Valley.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Gorge Metro Park...Cuyahoga River Valley.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Nominated for deletion by User:A1Cafel. I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 05:20, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Shougang Group logo.jpg

Yours sincerely, 沈澄心✉ 02:34, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Ostrava

Hello, several months ago you asked me for a better picture of blast furnaces in Vítkovice iron works, Ostrava. I haven't taken any new picture, but in my computer I found an old, but maybe good picture: https://screenshot.cz/HIYGD/ --Cmelak770 (talk) 07:19, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

@Cmelak770: Hello. I was off line some time so couldn't answer at once. Yes, of couse, I remember my request. Along this time I fond in the Wikimedia Commons some photos of this place and added them to this category. All photos I found are good but only this one can be a competitor to your photo as for me becouse of its resolution. But this photo is blurred. Of couse, I think your photo must be in above mentioned category to. If you think as well then do uploud your photo to that category. If you some time will be able to make a photo of that place in much more resolution then it will be good. Thank you very much. Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 18:03, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

File:Baowu Steel Group logo.png

File:Baowu Steel Group logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Minorax^«¦talk¦» 07:11, 7 August 2022 (UTC)