User talk:Benzoyl/log13

User talk:Benzoyl/log14 - User talk:Benzoyl/log13 - User talk:Benzoyl/log12 - User talk:Benzoyl/log11 - User talk:Benzoyl/log10 - User talk:Benzoyl/log9 - User talk:Benzoyl/log8 - User talk:Benzoyl/log7 - User talk:Benzoyl/log6 - User talk:Benzoyl/log5 - User talk:Benzoyl/log4 - User talk:Benzoyl/log3 - User talk:Benzoyl/log2

User talk:Benzoyl/log1 1-100 21:49, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

User talk:Benzoyl 101- 11:13, 9 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

archive 1

Latest comment: 5 years ago48 comments15 people in discussion

アップロードするファイルやファイル名の付け方など再考をお願いします

Benzoylさん、こんにちは。多くのファイルをアップロードされていますが、下記などをお読みになってアップロードするファイルやファイル名の付け方など再考してもらえませんでしょうか？

--BunBun-J (talk) 03:25, 12 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. User talk:BunBun-J --Benzoyl (talk) 03:27, 12 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

「教育的な目的」については、他の方の選択次第でして、一概には言えません。例：

and more --Benzoyl (talk) 03:36, 12 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

えーっと

お久しぶりです。ちょっと気になったのですが、上にも案内がきてますがコモンズの収載基準をごぞんじですか？
File:醤油煮味噌煮水煮 (22275074669).jpgもそうですが、いったいどのような教育的価値があるのでしょう？
削除依頼により削除されている写真も多そうです。もう少し考えてアップロードして貰えませんか？--Vigorous action (talk) 09:27, 12 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

どうも。お久しぶりです。アップロード（というか拾い）したうちの幾つかは教育的価値に疑問があるものもあるかもしれません。

ただ、この缶詰を指摘されるのは結構心外です。黒金銀は、何らかの文化的影響のある選択（ゴージャス感？）とも考えられます。その他も含めて引き続き議論を継続いたしましょう。WPと異なり、こちらではキャラが変わってますかもしれませんが、よろしくお願いいたします。 --Benzoyl (talk) 09:40, 12 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

なお、過去に削除依頼により削除されている写真のほとんどは、著作権問題 Copyright artworkのものです。--Benzoyl (talk) 09:43, 12 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

例えばFile:Pink Pout (16795048267).jpg どう利用されるか分からないものです。（ru:Губы de:Altfränkische Sprache WPに限らず、[1]）--Benzoyl (talk) 09:49, 12 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

じゃあ、著作権絡みでいうならこの写真伊藤食品さんの著作物の二次利用ですけど、ライセンスは無問題？伊藤食品さんは缶詰のデザインにもこだわりがあるようですけど。

さらに、File:イー・モバイル 2013 心斎橋筋 (9871988613) (2).jpgですけど、一般人の顔がわかる程度に写ってますが、被写体の許可などの権利関係の処理はお済みですか？--Vigorous action (talk) 05:05, 13 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

1つめは、Commons:Deletion requests/File:酢付手巻のり (14262795742).jpgの他者のご意見「simple text-based labeling」（結果は削除ながら）、Commons:Deletion requests/File:Randoseru.jpg（結果は存続）の系統と考えてます。
2つめは、Category:De minimisと考えてます。肖像権はどうでしょう。 --Benzoyl (talk) 05:08, 13 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

文字だけを見ればテキスト何だろうけど、配色とかレイアウトってのもデザイン構成の一つですよ。

あと、フリッカーの写真はライセンスはCC-BY-SAになってても実は盗作ってのが結構あるので本当に必要なもの＆自分できちんとリスク判断出来るもの以外は手を出さない方がいいと思うよ。--Vigorous action (talk) 05:59, 13 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

配色とかレイアウトは、本件は使用色の少なさから判断しました。話が五輪エンブレムみたいな流れになってますが。

他からの引用写真は、結構かどうかは分かりませんが、確かにありますね。#File:Small willy perhaps? (3504481977).jpgがそうでした。日本国内のは同一ユーザーの前後の写真も見てますので、判断できる感じとも思います（画質がまちまちなのとかはカメラ自体が異なってるなど）。何はともあれ、ご忠告ありがとうございます、と慎んで申し上げます。--Benzoyl (talk) 06:09, 13 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

ああ、書き忘れてた。文字であっても『書』と見なされれば著作権は発生します。ちなみに鯖はだれが書いても写真の文字のようにはなりません。--Vigorous action (talk) 13:59, 18 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

『書』としての独創性。例えば「イラスト素材: 鯛焼き」 [2] [3] 結構、字体似てますよね。魚の下の点3つを繋げるのは。 --Benzoyl (talk) 00:39, 19 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

v_aさんの、トークページ過去ログ方法を模倣したら、ひどい目にあってしまいました（コモンズでは非推奨らしい）。

#Talk page archiving

といっても、私の自己責任ですが。

ただ、個人的には「過去ログ化後」の（編集履歴からの）アクセスとしては、v_aさん方式の方が便利と感じております。

以上です。失礼いたしました。--Benzoyl (talk) 00:10, 11 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Category:Men_handshakes

Men handshakes has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ /−

Reguyla (talk) 18:27, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 01:24, 23 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

COM:AN/U

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ العربية ∙ /−

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Massive creation of questionable categories. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

Beeblebrox (talk) 01:19, 10 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 01:38, 10 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Massive creation of questionable categories

--Benzoyl (talk) 01:41, 10 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

ref - User:Benzoyl/Kenkyu

--Benzoyl (talk) 00:37, 14 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Talk page archiving

Archiving your talk page by moving it to an archive is not a 'standard' way to do it... it obscures the page history. Please read the instructions at COM:ARCHIVE. Material should be archived through a cut-paste move to the archive page. Thanks. Revent^talk 02:08, 10 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

[4] Sorry and thanks. I'll do my best reading COM:ARCHIVE --Benzoyl (talk) 02:12, 10 December 2016 (UTC) check of "page history" is very important. --Benzoyl (talk) 02:20, 10 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Comment I read [5] thanks.

But I should do over again now? ‎I do not know (understand) good enough.

Absolutely, Next chance in future, User talk:Benzoyl/log3 (Make in advance, after that, Copy<or>Cut and Paste to "log3") I don't make the same mistakes twice. --Benzoyl (talk) 11:51, 10 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Incidentally, The same way in Japanese Wikipedia (user Mr.v_a [#えーっと]) - [6] I won't do this-way again. --Benzoyl (talk) 12:04, 10 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

@Benzoyl:  Yes, just copy-paste the material to the archive page, then remove it from your talk page. (You can have this done automatically by a bot). That way the history of your talk page stays intact. Revent^talk 02:41, 10 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

no personal attacks

Personal attacks like this are not acceptable behaviour in Wikimedia projects. You may be be blocked if you continue to do it. Ankry (talk) 14:53, 10 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

That's not, what I meant personal attack. true respect.

But, on this occasion, the misinterpretation arose. I'll never do that again.

English also Japanese, language is difficult. International communication is difficult.

That's why, It might be, There is "Photos", "Wikimedia Commons" for Non-verbal communication. Thanks. --Benzoyl (talk) 00:05, 11 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

too many expensive function calls.

Archived to User talk:Benzoyl/log4 for reducing. But, still have trouble now, 2sections.

{{Autotranslate|base=Idw/heading}}

03:49, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
04:08, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
00:03, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

--Benzoyl (talk) 12:00, 13 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

caused by #Bicolor ? --Benzoyl (talk) 02:57, 19 February 2017 (UTC) --Benzoyl (talk) 23:56, 10 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:JR SKISKI Zenbu yuki no sei da as That's all because of the snow.jpg

File:JR SKISKI Zenbu yuki no sei da as That's all because of the snow.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

G I Chandor (talk) 05:29, 26 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Category:Mature_women

Mature women has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ /−

--ghouston (talk) 05:38, 18 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 08:21, 19 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Category:PNG diagrams in Japanese

Hi Benzoyl,

do we really need this category?--石炭発電所 (talk) 08:01, 5 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi. There are 94 files (mean "many") in this category. I think "need". also by themes Category:Music diagrams in Japanese, Category:Biological diagrams in Japanese etc. --Benzoyl (talk) 13:17, 9 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Category:Degree_of_frost

Category:Degree_of_frost has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ /−

Auntof6 (talk) 00:25, 23 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Category:Charter_trams

Charter trams has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ /−

-- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 13:17, 5 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Category:Outdoor_stages

Outdoor stages has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ /−

Themightyquill (talk) 07:34, 10 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 11:30, 25 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags

español ∙ galego ∙ English ∙ français ∙ Deutsch ∙ suomi ∙ עברית ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ македонски ∙ polski ∙ Nederlands ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ українська ∙ русский ∙ svenska ∙ /−

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from images that you have uploaded yourself. If you do not believe the image deserves to be deleted, then click "Challenge speedy deletion" to convert the tag to a regular deletion request. Thank you.

You may also file a DR per COM:DR. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 11:38, 25 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

In this case, File talk:Tokyo tour (27344854598).jpg ?

Sorry, I didn't know this rule. I will make sure that this will never happen again. (I'll be careful from now on.) --Benzoyl (talk) 11:44, 25 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Yes, thank you, and please ping me. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 11:56, 25 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

被写体の所在地を確認してからアップロードして下さい

ですが、原典のサイトで撮影地が記載されている、または撮影地が特定できるのにも拘らず、なぜCategory:November 2018 in Japanに入れるんですか。他人に再確認の手間を掛けないで下さい。非常に迷惑です。撮影者が原典を削除すれば確認の手段もなくなります。コモンズを始めたばかりの利用者ならいざ知らず、何年もやっていてこの有様では迷惑利用者認定せざるを得ませんね。何度注意しても改善が見られない。こうした行為を続けるようならば然るべき場所に報告しますのでそのつもりで。--トトト (talk) 14:16, 24 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Info File:BOSS 新幹線夢の旅 2016 (25665186354).jpgなども全く不正確で、被写体の場所を調べる意思が最初からありませんね。あなたがアップロードした画像はこうしたものが多く、後で整理するのに非常な労力を伴います。それから適切にカテゴリ付けするだけでは不十分で、そのカテゴリ付けを納得させるだけの解説を概要欄に書かなければ、利用者はカテゴリ付け自体の意味が理解できず、信用できないんですよ。あなたが過去にアップロードした画像は特にね（この画像の初版などもそう）。だから結局再確認の手間を強いられる。ちなみに広告の分類なんかしても使える形での画像は著作権に引っかかりますから無意味なんですが、それも分かっていないんですか。
新規に画像をアップロードするのは今すぐ止めなさい。そして自分が過去にアップロードした何百枚の画像を全て整理し直して下さい。被写体が何県の何市・町・村に所属するのか一枚一枚確認して、適切な分類にしなおして下さい。「月別 20xx in Japan」にあるものを残らず整理して下さい。分類がいい加減すぎます。これが出来ないのなら迷惑ユーザー確定です。--トトト (talk) 16:22, 24 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

「原典のサイトで撮影地が記載されている」

外国人観光客の方の場合また国内の方の場合であっても、漠然と撮影地タグを付けてる場合もありますので、万が一違う場所だったら困るので、自分で確認とれたもの以外はカテゴリにはしてません。ということなんですけど。--Benzoyl (talk) 00:05, 25 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

「何県の何市・町・村に所属するのか」

これについては、過去に出た「箱根問題」を参照ください。

User talk:Batholith#カテゴリ外し乱発について / Commons:井戸端/過去ログ15#Template:Low quality「被写体を十分に表していません」の定義について（都道府県や基礎自治体以下のカテゴリは不要です） --Benzoyl (talk) 00:27, 25 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
参考情報 Commons:井戸端#monthbyyearjapan Category:○月 20XX in Japanの県別細分化傾向および強制につきまして --Benzoyl (talk) 12:33, 30 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
自分は関与してないんですが、このような大量カテゴリ例もあります。 --Benzoyl (talk) 07:11, 1 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:Snjezana Kordic keynote presentation Japan.jpg

Commons:構造化データよく知りませんが、カテゴリとかデータ付与とか自動化されるといいですね。 --Benzoyl (talk) 00:50, 2 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

archive 2

Latest comment: 5 years ago18 comments5 people in discussion

Category:Summer_holidays

Summer holidays has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ /−

Auntof6 (talk) 18:35, 12 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 19:52, 25 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category:Comic foregrounds

Comic foregrounds has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ /−

--El Grafo (talk) 12:56, 5 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 00:08, 6 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category:Six_and_nine

Six and nine has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ /−

Themightyquill (talk) 10:49, 21 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 02:53, 22 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category:Very_(adjective)

Category:Very_(adjective) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ /−

Auntof6 (talk) 10:32, 26 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 10:20, 28 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category:Foreign_countries

Category:Foreign_countries has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ /−

Auntof6 (talk) 07:22, 30 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 00:29, 15 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:線路側オープン (536682209).jpg

Hi, I noticed this diff where you added Category:Danger. Where is "Danger"?--Kai3952 (talk) 05:44, 27 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

HI, Kai3952. I'm sorry for the delay in replying to you.

In this case, The doors opened on the opposite side of the Train station platforms.

I think, there is a possibility "another trains are coming". Therefore danger. What do you think, Thanks. --Benzoyl (talk) 22:13, 30 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

If a passenger sit on the door, or stuck in the door, or fall off from the door, then there is no problem with adding the "Danger" category. However, the problem is that this file just shows the doors opened on the opposite side of the platform and not enough to show "danger".--Kai3952 (talk) 16:30, 31 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

I wonder "danger" = results (accidents), "risk" = possibility. In case, Surely the worker near the door looks cautiously = (not danger). --Benzoyl (talk) 23:12, 31 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

What I mean to say is, you think might happen does not really happen.--Kai3952 (talk) 18:40, 2 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

"The train doors opened on the opposite side of the platform" is it often (=common) case (in Taiwan)? --Benzoyl (talk) 03:26, 18 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

What I mean is that "Danger" is from your imagination rather than from the image "File:線路側オープン (536682209).jpg".--Kai3952 (talk) 07:58, 11 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

As I said before, I fail to see where the danger was in this case.--Kai3952 (talk) 08:05, 11 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

archive 3

Latest comment: 4 years ago29 comments8 people in discussion

Category:Groups_with_objects

Groups with objects has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ /−

JopkeB (talk) 04:30, 15 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 04:20, 16 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category:Shoulder_loops

Shoulder loops has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ /−

Themightyquill (talk) 21:28, 20 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 11:29, 21 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category:Indoor

Indoor has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ /−

Themightyquill (talk) 09:47, 20 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 04:37, 1 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Bamboo_walls

Bamboo walls has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ /−

Estopedist1 (talk) 20:14, 4 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 08:44, 8 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Round_pizzas_by_slice

Round pizzas by slice has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ /−

Josh (talk) 00:28, 20 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 21:13, 20 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Flickrの写真をアップロードする場合、Exifの中に撮影日があるのかどうかを確認してください。Exifに日付らしきものがあってもファイルの改変日（＝レタッチした日付）の場合もあります。撮影日がないと判定した場合は日付欄| Date= に {{Original upload date}} を使って下さい。枚数を沢山アップロードするよりも、1枚1枚をもっと精査して下さい。10年以上前に撮影した写真を今アップロードする人などざらにいます。この画像などは、2020年6月撮影であるとは限りません。インスタグラムからFlickrに上げられたものについてはその月撮影の写真と推定して構わないケースもあると思いますが、そうでない場合は撮影日は不明とすべきです。ファイル名も雑すぎます。--トトト (talk) 11:22, 24 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

これは、当方が使用させて頂いてるツール「Flickr 2 commons」側の仕様でして。1ユーザーが人力で逐一対処できるものではない（限界がある）と思うのですが…。あと最近は「沢山」はアプロドしておりません。--Benzoyl (talk) 00:47, 5 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Flickrで閲覧して探し出す時点で撮影情報があるかどうかは分かりますよ。Flickr 2 commonsでアップアップロードしてから毎回分類なさっているわけですから、そのときに{{Original upload date}}を日付欄に入れてください。--トトト (talk) 04:27, 5 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
- そもそもレタッチした日付になってるのって、何割ぐらいあるもんなんですかね。稀なケースのものを探すために全部を毎回チェックするのを強いるのはナンセンスです。申し上げたいのはそういうことせす。

割合まで調べてませんが結構ありますよ。ソフトによりますがRAWで撮影した写真をJPEGに出力しなおしただけでその出力した日付を入れてしまうものあるようです。さらに切り抜いただけでその切り抜いた日付が無意識に入ってしまう場合もある。コモンズに直接上げてくる人は撮影日の欄をきちんと入れ直す人が比較的多いと思いますが、Flickrなんか個人の写真帳ですからそこまで気にしない人の方が多いと思います。何百枚もアップロードおられるのにそんなこともご存じないとは思えませんが。--トトト (talk) 09:22, 5 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

- そして、カメラの時計設定自体が間違ってる場合だってあるでしょう。Exifを鵜呑みにしてはいけないかと。いかかでしょう。引き続き宜しくお願いいたします。--Benzoyl (talk) 06:31, 5 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

極限すれば撮影された日付がおかしいかどうかを見破るのもコモンズへのアップロード者の責任ですよ。明らかにExifがおかしいと確信できれば{{Invalid Exif date}}を入れます（日付の後ろに　({{Invalid Exif date}})）。外国人の旅行者が撮影した日本の写真でカメラの時刻設定が母国のままになってケースもまま見られます。昼間の写真なのに1:13AMとか。そういう場合は必要に応じて{{According to EXIF data}}を入れます（日付欄に直接入れると|location=Japanが必要になり[[Category:Japan photographs taken on ....]]の分類が正確でなくなることがあり面倒くさいので、私は日付の後に ({{According to EXIF data|}})と入れています）。撮影者でない第三者が資料としてアップロードするという意識をもっと持って下さい。この画像とか、ExifがないのにDecember 2017 in Saitama prefectureとかもう一つ信用できません。これなんかも元の撮影者がFlickrから消してしまったから真相は不明のままです。カメラの設定が間違っているかもしれないからいい加減でいいということにはなりません。--トトト (talk) 09:22, 5 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

({{According to EXIF data|}})などは勉強になりました。ご教授ありがとうございました。やれる範囲でやりたいと考えております。 --Benzoyl (talk) 09:29, 5 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

横からコメントします。Benzoylさんへ。警告:ツールのせいにして対応できないならアップロードしないでください。または対応できるだけのアップロード量にしてください。「Flickr 2 commons」はどのファイルをアップロードするか選択できるチェックボタンがあったはずですから、二次著作物などの著作権侵害ファイルは事前に排除することができるはずです。他者に無神経に尻拭いをさせる利用者とは共同作業は出来かねます。--Batholith (talk) 05:36, 5 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

補足、他者の尻拭いもをするのが共同作業ですが、尻拭いさせ続けるのは共同作業ではなく介護です。--Batholith (talk) 05:48, 5 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

横からと書けば何でも書いていいもんではないですね。悪いですがあなたには今回あまり返答できませんよ。 --Benzoyl (talk) 06:31, 5 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

誰でも意見できるのがこの共同作業によるサイトですよ。それを否定されるならアウトです。関係ないことを書いた訳ではありません。「Flickr 2 commons」はあなたがトップレベルで使用されているでしょう。この件はしっかり記憶にと留めておきます。 --Batholith (talk) 09:17, 5 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

全然トップレベルではありません。どこソースでしょうか。もうちょっと調べてから発言して頂きたかったので、今回に関しましては距離を置きました。 --Benzoyl (talk) 09:20, 5 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

で、この話題をここでしているだけではもったいないので情報共有目的で「Commons:井戸端#{{Original upload date}} 使用の推奨について」セクションを作っておきました。
この度は、貴重なご提言誠にありがとうございました。一個人でできることは限界ありますが、将来もっと簡略に撮影日情報の編集が可能になることを祈る次第です。 --Benzoyl (talk) 09:43, 5 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Benzoylさんのファイル数がトップレベルかどうかですが、私が調べた限りでは編集回数では392,900回で95位でした。ページの作成数が156位です。ファイル数のランキングまでは私は分かりませんでしたが、ページの作成数にファイル数もカウントされていると思われ、また、Benzoylさんはカテゴリなどのページの作成より、ファイルのアップにかなり偏っていることもあり、ファイル数だけなら100位は軽く超えてくるのではないしょうか。データがないので言い切ることはできませんが、1ファイルでもアップしたユーザーを分母とすれば上位1％には十分に入ってくると思います。 --Batholith (talk) 10:47, 5 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
- それは調査対象を、日本語話者であるコモンズ参加者、だけに限定した話ですかね。--Benzoyl (talk) 10:51, 5 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

そんな機能はなさそうです。これ以上は自分でプログラミングするしかないのでしょう。そもそもなぜ「日本語話者であるコモンズ参加者、だけに限定」する意味が分からないのですが。もし限ったとしたらトップ5には入るのでないでしょうか。Benzoylさんは24,945ファイルです。私が知る範囲でファイル数の多そうな方を挙げますと、近年ご活躍されているそらみみさんが42,160ファイル。2005から現在まで多数の自作ファイルをアップしてきた663highlandさんが26,509ファイル。山岳系のAlpsdakeさんが17,604ファイルです。私の属性が影響して地理系に偏っていますが他の分野にも多い方がいるかもしれません。

ここまで書いてやっと気が付きました。日本語話者限定という変な部分が気になるということは、Benzoylさんはファイル数を競ってらっしゃるんですね？。ですからいろいろいい加減だと。利用者のためではないと。なるほどですね。しかしどんなに数を競っても自分で苦労して著作物を創作される方には評価では勝てませんよ。断言しておきます。--Batholith (talk) 11:57, 5 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

逆ですよ。競ってません。日本語話者以外で大量アップロードしてるユーザーを結構見かけますよ、という話です。「カテゴリなどのページの作成より、ファイルのアップにかなり偏っている」も調べてないけど、間違ってませんかね。ソースなし類推は本当に迷惑です。 --Benzoyl (talk) 22:13, 5 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Individual

Individual has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ /−

Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 08:35, 14 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 17:00, 14 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

archive 4

Latest comment: 3 years ago31 comments9 people in discussion

letter combinations (order)

I cannot understand the difference you meant when you created Category:ABC letter combinations (order) out of Category:ABC letter combinations. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 04:47, 29 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I think Category:Syllabaries = order.

For example, American Broadcasting Company is Acronyms, not order.--Benzoyl (talk) 13:33, 29 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, I understand now. Not sure if whether that distinction warrants a separate category, but go ahead. If I understood correctly, Category:DEF letter combinations (order) follows this idea, while, say, Category:ANZ letter combinations (order) does not, yes? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 10:12, 30 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
See also Category:Consecutive letter combinations. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 10:20, 30 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Sorry for the late reply. There may be such a case (DEF=4/5/6 & ANZ=01/14/26). But, unfortunately I'm not familiar with it.
I suppose this category, "ABC-order" is the replacement-system A=1st, B=2nd, C=3rd, D=4th... (X=1st or 10Oct, Y=2nd or 11Nov, Z=3rd or 12Dec). Thanks. --Benzoyl (talk) 02:04, 23 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Dishes_using_parsley_of_Japan

Dishes using parsley of Japan has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ /−

E4024 (talk) 02:17, 27 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 01:22, 5 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Groups_of_3_pieces_of_food

Groups of 3 pieces of food has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ /−

E4024 (talk) 17:32, 11 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 23:49, 16 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Horiemon 2014 (16002363675).jpg

File:Horiemon 2014 (16002363675).jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. Wikimedia Commons doesn't permit uploading personal files unless you are using them for personal use or an educational purpose.

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now ! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images and best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : 46.101.18.39.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 09:40, 19 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 13:38, 13 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Wide_open_legs_(knees_close)

Wide open legs (knees close) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ /−

E4024 (talk) 21:43, 27 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 13:38, 13 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Belt Failure (234582464).jpg

File:Belt Failure (234582464).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Genericusername57 (talk) 17:28, 1 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 13:39, 13 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:こばた (15233011049).jpg

File:こばた (15233011049).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 10:07, 29 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 15:29, 10 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Middle-aged_women

Middle-aged women has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ /−

E4024 (talk) 14:44, 7 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 15:29, 10 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:20201108rikkoshi01.jpg

File:20201108rikkoshi01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

A1Cafel (talk) 04:38, 15 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 12:09, 15 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:20201108rikkoshi02.jpg

File:20201108rikkoshi02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

A1Cafel (talk) 04:39, 15 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 12:09, 15 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Upskirt_in_sports

Upskirt in sports has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ /−

Genericusername57 (talk) 19:36, 28 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 09:39, 29 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:84 degrees, 92 percent humidity, and the Shrine isn't even visible. It's being rebuilt. (29268970246).jpg

File:84 degrees, 92 percent humidity, and the Shrine isn't even visible. It's being rebuilt. (29268970246).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

A1Cafel (talk) 09:11, 18 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 07:51, 29 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Olympic Club (3) (28272807339).jpg

File:Olympic Club (3) (28272807339).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Mysteryman blue 05:18, 7 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 07:51, 29 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Protruding_from_walls

Category:Protruding_from_walls has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ /−

Whisperjanes (talk) 20:09, 13 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 07:51, 29 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Affected:

File:Chifure logo.png

And also:

Yours sincerely, Wcam (talk) 13:02, 7 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 01:58, 18 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Nagoya Girls (104604784).jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

File:Nagoya Girls (104604784).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Dronebogus (talk) 00:15, 26 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 07:30, 27 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Affected:

File:FR Nice beach - 1961 (EU61-K31-24) (51687117964).jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Tokfo (talk) 06:49, 21 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 04:37, 26 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:20190920rugby03.jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

File:20190920rugby03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

220.246.234.95 16:58, 19 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 04:38, 26 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:Images_with_transparent_background_by_subject

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Category:Images_with_transparent_background_by_subject has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ /−

YuriNikolai (talk) 06:34, 27 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 19:15, 21 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Asia autumn (51669098126).jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

File:Asia autumn (51669098126).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Le Loy (talk) 04:36, 11 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 19:15, 21 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:Playing_children_in_Japan

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Playing children in Japan has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ /−

217.117.125.83 19:32, 15 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 19:15, 21 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:Different_one_only

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Different one only has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ /−

Jochen Burghardt (talk) 15:33, 4 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 20:08, 2 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Poster (16303495939).jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

File:Poster (16303495939).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

A1Cafel (talk) 03:49, 13 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 20:08, 2 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Tokyo - Tatemonoen (28208897335).jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

File:Tokyo - Tatemonoen (28208897335).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

A1Cafel (talk) 03:53, 17 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 20:08, 2 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:扉を開ければそこはモロッコ (14540159093).jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

File:扉を開ければそこはモロッコ (14540159093).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

A1Cafel (talk) 03:58, 17 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 20:08, 2 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:2_letter_alphabet_logos

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

2 letter alphabet logos has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ /−

-- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 19:27, 29 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 20:08, 2 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:0_people

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Category:0_people has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ /−

Gestumblindi (talk) 20:34, 18 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 20:08, 2 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

このファイル名の付け方はどういうお考えで？

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

現在、このファイル名は改名されて「File:Seta junior high school.jpg」となっていますが、貴方が投稿された当初は「File:いじめ (381758383).jpg」でした。Flickr側の元のファイルを見てもそのような名前が見当たりません。この名づけはどういう意図がありますか？覚えていらっしゃらないようであれば、現在考えてこと名づけをどう思われますか？運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 18:49, 28 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

「どういうお考えで？」

って語尾の使い方、日常会話でも使われてるんでしょうか？

それはさておき、元のファイル＝原典 Junior High School

ではアンマリなので、中央下部にピッタリ映った「いじめ」をタイトルにしただけです。 --Benzoyl (talk) 19:53, 2 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Exposição Design & Utopia dos Jogos (28592833220).jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

File:Exposição Design & Utopia dos Jogos (28592833220).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

A1Cafel (talk) 14:50, 30 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 20:08, 2 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:Tokyo Shibuya Scramble Crossing 2018-10-09.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Tokyo Shibuya Scramble Crossing 2018-10-09.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 11 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 11:56, 25 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Night out in Matsumoto (48923737812).jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

File:Night out in Matsumoto (48923737812).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

82.135.80.52 00:44, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 11:56, 25 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:コアラのマーチ焼 (27647338429).jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

File:コアラのマーチ焼 (27647338429).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

A1Cafel (talk) 03:26, 3 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 11:56, 25 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Affected:

File:2015 shaped sunglasses (15827579308).jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Syunsyunminmin (talk) 06:47, 9 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 11:56, 25 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Affected:

File:ラブドール足の裏 (34351218434).jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 14:37, 10 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 11:56, 25 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:Interesting

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Category:Interesting has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ /−

JopkeB (talk) 06:45, 13 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 11:56, 25 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:のまネコ from 恋のマイヤヒ (61489491).jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

File:のまネコ from 恋のマイヤヒ (61489491).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

A1Cafel (talk) 14:09, 14 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 11:56, 25 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

小柴ホール

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

こんにちは、失礼ですが、私は日本を訪れたことのある台湾人です。あなたが数年前に撮影した東京大学の写真をWikipediaで見たので、失礼ながらご連絡します。どうかお許しください。

2016年に東大を訪れ、小柴ホールの写真を撮ったことがありますが、当時は設備が悪く写真がぼやけていました https://www.flickr.com/photos/138479723@N04/albums/72177720304482625

現在、小柴ホールの展示内容が変更されているため、撮影を再開する機会がなかったのはずっと残念でした。

同じ場所を撮影した写真があれば、あなたからそれらを購入できますか？私は個人的なコレクションだけを使用しています。これは失礼な要求ですが、お許しください。

私のメッセージを読んでくれてありがとうございました。Kt Meursault (talk) 07:48, 24 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Kt Meursault (talk · contribs)様、初めまして。この度は、とても丁寧なお便り、誠にありがとうございます。全然失礼なことではございません。

小柴ホールの写真（Category:Buildings in Hongo Campus, the University of Tokyo）ですが、残念なことに、私は一枚も所有しておりません。折角のご依頼にお力になれず申し訳ございません。

Flickrなどに、もしかしたら当該写真は存在するかもしれませんが、現状まだ発見できておりません。

引き続きご質問がございましたら、ご遠慮なく、こちらで再度お尋ねください。どうぞ今後とも宜しくお願いいたします。--Benzoyl (talk) 11:20, 25 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:Copyright_deletion_requests

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Copyright deletion requests has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ /−

Gestumblindi (talk) 19:09, 26 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 18:27, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Ikeda Building in 2005 (25172739).jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

File:Ikeda Building in 2005 (25172739).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

A1Cafel (talk) 08:08, 12 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 18:27, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:People_looking_downward

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Category:People_looking_downward has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ /−

RZuo (talk) 12:55, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 18:27, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Spanish Navy naval uniforms of the Spanish Navy

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi. Since you moved Category:Navy uniforms by country to Category:Naval uniforms by country in 2016, I'd like to invite you to Commons:Categories for discussion/2023/01/Category:Uniforms of the Spanish Navy. Unfortunately most of the categories involved were created by IPs and so far I don't have any strong opinions about navy/naval uniform categorization. Thank you! TilmannR (talk) 20:45, 25 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 21:46, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Two_of_(perspective)

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Category:Two_of_(perspective) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ /−

Josh (talk) 20:50, 25 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 21:46, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Interesting

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Category:Interesting has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

JopkeB (talk) 05:09, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 21:46, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

ご来場まともにありがとうございまする

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

おいBenzoyl様

ご来場まともにありがとうございまする

このよるー

私の日本語はわかるのですか

あなた様は私もだいたいわかるのです

きつとあなた様はわかることだろう

ねそうでしよ

私は日本語ジヨズじやないじやない

でもほめらるるるんだよ

おいBenzoyl様

どしてあなた様はおかしいのお写真アプロドするー

あなた様のお写真来る日もまた来る日も削除されとるやん

トラの子どもやん

あるいはタカのベビであるのかもしれぬな

だがしかし怒りを持つてはならぬ

それと同時に理解せねばならぬ

慈しみやさしみ愛を持つて

正しくはげみたまえ

ありがとうございまするBenzoyl様

このよるー

--~~~~ Hand Sin Sin (talk) 10:16, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Hand Sin Sin様。

お気遣いと温かい叱咤激励、この度は誠にありがとうございます。

近頃は色々と別件を優先し、ログインすらしておりませんでした。全くの怠慢ですね、申し訳ございません。

機会を見つけ、極力追々、また画像やカテゴリの探究に勤しみたいと思います。

今後とも何卒よろしくお願いいたします。--Benzoyl (talk) 21:34, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:City Slickers (2123621090).jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

File:City Slickers (2123621090).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Dannebrog Spy (talk) 15:10, 15 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 04:39, 21 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Three-quarter_views_of_automobiles

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Three-quarter views of automobiles has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ /−

ReneeWrites (talk) 01:03, 18 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 04:39, 21 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:株式上場企業 (2722449689).jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

File:株式上場企業 (2722449689).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Headlock0225 (talk) 06:27, 18 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 04:39, 21 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Ramen shops in Taiwan‎‎

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Ramen shops in Taiwan has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ /−

--トトト (talk) 08:38, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 04:39, 21 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Single_stripe_flags

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Single stripe flags has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ /−

RZuo (talk) 16:41, 20 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 04:39, 21 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:NHK_Television_program_Logos

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

NHK Television program Logos has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ /−

···日本穣 ^{Talk to Nihonjoe} 16:52, 4 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 04:39, 21 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:なくもんか (15634044837).jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

File:なくもんか (15634044837).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

むじんくん (talk) 08:30, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 04:39, 21 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Affected:

File:Karoke is big in Japan (7121585733).jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, RZuo (talk) 08:45, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 04:39, 21 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Tokyo080 (7294808648).jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

File:Tokyo080 (7294808648).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

A1Cafel (talk) 07:21, 20 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 04:39, 21 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Hei Finland (16014497134).jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

File:Hei Finland (16014497134).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

A1Cafel (talk) 07:17, 2 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 00:25, 21 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Woman_of_Japan

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Woman of Japan has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ /−

RZuo (talk) 12:20, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 00:25, 21 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Affected:

File:HIRARA sandwich cafe. (51598155167).jpg

Yours sincerely, —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:48, 15 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 00:25, 21 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:カメラde辞書（和英）ピントレベル (363067840).jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

File:カメラde辞書（和英）ピントレベル (363067840).jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

This image is a screenshot of a non-free program or other copyrighted material.

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ हिन्दी ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ /−

沈澄心 ✉ 14:52, 19 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. --Benzoyl (talk) 00:25, 21 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Food_ticket_machines

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Food ticket machines has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!