Beaest

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Beaest!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 10:01, 29 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:Leonardo,_beatrice_d'este_e_francesco_sforza.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

Ciao, io non sono amministratore ma un normale utente come te, un amministratore it.wiki ha annullato la procedura di cancellazione e ha trasferito la foto qui su commons ha specificato una licenza PD-Art, tu l'hai tolta senza motivazione (io ho annullato solo questa parte). Dovresti sentire l'utente che ha fatto la procedura @Holapaco77: , lo pingo così magari ti potrà dare maggiori informazioni --ZioNicco (talk) 09:26, 4 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Infatti ho contatto anche lui per saperne il motivo e non mi ha ancora risposto. Ma capirai che dopo mesi di insistenze vane questa situazione mi sta esasperando, anche perché adesso non riesco neppure più a mettere l'avviso di cancellazione! Mi pare veramente assurdo. --Beaest (talk) 09:29, 4 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

La posizione ufficiale presa dalla Wikimedia Foundation è che le riproduzioni fedeli di opere d'arte bidimensionali (dipinti, affreschi, ecc.) nel pubblico dominio siano da considerare anch'esse nel pubblico dominio, e che qualsiasi affermazione contraria rappresenta un attacco al concetto stesso di pubblico dominio ("faithful reproductions of two-dimensional public domain works of art are public domain, and that claims to the contrary represent an assault on the very concept of a public domain"). La riproduzione fotografica è di conseguenza da considerarsi nel pubblico dominio. --Holapaco77 (talk) 10:48, 4 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ma cosa si intende per pubblico dominio? Io l'avevo presa solamente da Instagram, non mi pare che fosse messa a disposizione di tutti. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beaest (talk • contribs) 11:28, 4 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Leggi qua: Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag --Holapaco77 (talk) 17:10, 4 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Holapaco77: Scusa il ritardo, sono stata impegnata. Ho letto la spiegazione e ti ringrazio per avermela allegata perché mi è stata utile a capire. In questo specifico caso non so se l'autore abbia utilizzato effetti speciali per scattare/pubblicare la foto, ma se tu mi dici che si può benissimo lasciare e che non ci saranno futuri problemi io non ho altro motivo per chiederne la rimozione.

Cancellazioni inutili

Latest comment: 2 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Ciao, su Commons teniamo file diversi per ciascun dipinto, e il fatto che uno sia preferibile a un altro non vuol dire che tutti gli altri vadano cancellati. Per questo ti consiglio di non perdere tempo a proporre file in cancellazione che, per policy, saranno comunque tenuti. Proponi la cancellazione solo se si tratta della stessa identica immagine ma in risoluzione minore, oppure se un file ha evidenti problemi, come sfocatura o watermark appariscenti. Grazie --Sailko (talk) 09:07, 4 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Sailko in uno dei tre casi (Pala Sforzesca per intero) si tratta di una stessa identica immagine a risoluzione molto inferiore; i rimanenti (dettaglio di Beatrice d'Este) due rappresentano la stessa immagine in scarsa definizione e potrebbe benissimo esserne tenuta una soltanto, se non proprio eliminate entrambe, dato che è una sorta di ritaglio di quella che io ho caricato in migliore risoluzione. Il problema è che troppe immagini ingombrano inutilmente la lista (soprattutto se sono pescate durante l'allestimento delle singole voci tramite lo scomodo "inserisci immagini e file multimediali" dove non ti è permesso verificare la risoluzione dell'immagine se non aprendole ad una ad una, e dovendo ogni volta ripetere la ricerca daccapo, poiché tornare indietro equivale a chiudere), il rischio è che utenti poco attenti o frettolosi scelgano la versione a scarsa risoluzione invece di quella ad alta risoluzione, per questo ritengo che tenere tutte queste versioni sia dannoso. Ho proposto la cancellazione perché mi è stato detto che Wikipedia non è un contenitore di immagini e che quelle inutilizzate devono essere cancellate. Beaest (talk) 09:13, 4 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Carissimo, non confondere Wikipedia con Commons. Commons ha altre regole e sono quelle che ti ho scritto. Per vedere qual è l'immagine più grande basta che leggi la risoluzione sotto ogni thumbnail in categoria. Per eleggere il file migliore per rappresentare un determinato soggetto puoi seguire la procedura di Commons:Valued images, non cancellare quelle che ti sembrano peggiori, tantomeno i dettagli ritagliati da immagini più grandi. --Sailko (talk) 09:44, 4 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Sailko Va bene, come preferisci, però vorrei precisare che anche un amministratore (Ruthven mi pare si scrivesse) mi spiegò che vanno caricate solo immagini di qualità, e quelle a troppo bassa risoluzione non vanno bene. Ho proposto la cancellazione partendo dal presupposto che queste vecchie versioni non dovessero più venire utilizzate neppure volendo (e neppure per sbaglio), e che abbiano i colori più scuri o i colori più chiari aggiunge poco o nullo prestigio alla loro condizione. Se proprio non le si vuol cancellare, la cosa più logica sarebbe a questo punto sovrascriverle con nuovi ritagli a maggiore risoluzione e coi medesimi colori. Beaest (talk) 15:16, 4 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Allora, allora, ho guardato meglio. I dettagli di Beatrice Sforza effettivamente sono superati da quello che hai linkato (superseeded), quindi ho cambiato il mio parere sulla cancellazione. L'intero della pala Sforzesca può benissimo stare accanto all'altro file, perché leggermente diverso (nella resa dei colori). La risoluzione non è pessima, quindi su Commons in genere si preferisce tenerne più di uno. Il fatto che su Wikidata sia linkato quello migliore è già di per sé sufficiente. Grazie, --Sailko (talk) 15:19, 4 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

riferimenti indicati non sono affidabili

Latest comment: 1 year ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hello, may I ask on what criteria you claim that my blog is not reliable? What exacly is not reliable?

Non è Bona Sforza, i riferimenti non sono affidabili!|user=Beaest

https://artinpoland.weebly.com/

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Italian_(Venetian)_School_-_Portrait_of_a_Lady_-_NG631_-_National_Gallery_01.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=737401487&diffmode=source

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Ritratto_muliebre_di_anonimo_veneziano.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=737405479&diffmode=source Artinpl (talk) 10:46, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Artinpl come tu stesso hai detto, il tuo è un "blog". Un sito personale non può essere usato come fonte perché scritto da chiunque, a meno che l'autore non sia uno storico, uno studioso o uno scienziato di rinomata fama internazionale. Aggiungo a ciò che buona parte delle tue attribuzioni, che ho scorso velocemente, mi sembrano fatte abbastanza a caso, cioè arbitrariamente. La donna bionda che tu presumi essere Bona, non si è capito perché, sarebbe un ritratto di donna veneziana, secondo la galleria nazionale, non napoletana e non milanese. Ora io di certo non sono esperta di questi ritratti, ma se vuoi scrivere che possa trattarsi di Bona allora devi presentare delle fonti autorevoli, che siano libri, studi pubblicati o siti ufficiali (vedi quello del museo). In questo caso il sito ufficiale del museo non fa alcun accenno a Bona. Beaest (talk) 11:19, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

You are not an expert on these portraits, as you mentioned, but you can arbitrarily judge the reliability! Surely I will not argue with such reliability in a place where all photos are self-published. Artinpl (talk) 12:12, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Artinpl non sono io a dover dare delle spiegazioni ma tu, perché se il museo non identifica il ritratto con nessuna donna, neppure tu sei un critico d'arte ufficiale per poter dire che si tratta di Bona. Che la maggior parte delle fotografie siano auto pubblicate non vuol dire nulla, perché si presuppone che se io carico una foto di un quadro o di una scultura lo faccia sulla base della targhetta del museo che mi spiega il soggetto e l'autore dell'opera, non che sia io stesso a trovargliene uno. Sia chiaro che finché non c'è nessuno che viene a sindacare, tu puoi pubblicare qualsiasi cosa, ma io ero stufa di vedere personaggi storici identificati in ritratti che non c'entrano nulla con loro, quindi terrò sotto stretta sorveglianza sia Isabella d'Aragona sia Bona Sforza. Beaest (talk) 12:31, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Retouch 1700758236671.PNG

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Copyright status: File:Retouch 1700758236671.PNG

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ /−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Retouch 1700758236671.PNG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 20:06, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Affected:

File:Re Ferrandino d'Aragona e la moglie Giovannella di Napoli 01.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 18:12, 6 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Affected:

File:Re Ferrandino d'Aragona e la moglie Giovannella di Napoli 01.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Trade (talk) 18:15, 6 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Pls add more info on how you made the AI images

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Could you please:

Also add English-language descriptions / captions to your images? If necessary just use a translator for that.
Not upload images with major misgeneration issues? Some images apparently feature misgenerated hands – it would be good to not upload these since you upload quite a few, it may be different if you didn't upload as many.
Add some info on how you made these images?
- Which software did you use? Midjourney? Midjourney Photoshop / Dall-E / …
- Which prompt(s) did you use? Please add something about that to new and if possible at least some existing images – that would make them more useful and would enable people to learn from these images as in how to create such high-quality images depicting scenes of the past (past imaginaries, imaginaries about the past or aiming to be somewhat realistic).

Thank you. Prototyperspective (talk) 22:48, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Prototyperspective ciao, scusa se rispondo solo adesso. Le immagini nella categoria Ferdinando II d'Aragona sono state eliminate tutte, perciò non ho più intenzione di caricare nessuna immagine di intelligenza artificiale, né di spendere tempo a migliorare la forma e la descrizione di quelle già caricate, non avrebbe senso se poi dovranno essere cancellate. Quando sarà presa una chiara decisione in merito da parte della comunità, allora anch'io deciderò il da farsi. Beaest (talk) 17:00, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Discesa_di_Carlo_VIII_in_Italia

Latest comment: 11 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Discesa di Carlo VIII in Italia has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ /−

Jmabel ! talk 02:56, 2 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 11 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Affected:

File:Bernardo Contarini consegna le teste mozzate dei francesi alla duchessa Beatrice d'Este 01.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 08:07, 5 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 11 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Affected:

File:Beauvau saluta la duchessa Beatrice d'Este con un bacio alla francese alla presenza del marito Ludovico il Moro 01.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 08:11, 5 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 11 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Affected:

File:Conquiste amorose di Galeazzo Sanseverino 01.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 06:19, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 11 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Affected:

File:Beatrice d'Este annuncia alla Serenissima Repubblica di Venezia l'imminente discesa di Carlo VIII in Italia 01.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 06:27, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 11 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Affected:

File:Beatrice d'Este all'assedio di Novara 01.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 06:34, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 11 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Affected:

File:L'incontro tra l'imperatore Massimiliano I d'Asburgo e la duchessa di Milano Beatrice d'Este a Malles Venosta 01.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 06:37, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 11 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Affected:

File:Beauvau segue la duchessa Beatrice d'Este nel labirinto del castello di Asti 01.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:05, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Affected:

File:Ludovico Sforza con la moglie Beatrice d'Este e il neonato Ercole Massimiliano Sforza.png

And also:

Yours sincerely, The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:29, 28 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic