Wikimedia Commons

User talk:Babu/Archive 1

< User talk:Babu
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Patrick Rogel in topic Notification about possible deletion

Images from Facebook?

Latest comment: 7 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Babu,

The metadata from File:29 January Romanian protest10.jpg (same for some related images) shows that this image was originally published on Facebook. Did you publish them on Facebook yourself or how did you get permission for reuse.

Greetings, Basvb (talk) 16:15, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi Basvb,
My friends publish their photos on Facebook, but give me the permission to upload them on Commons. The permission was given by Facebook chat in Romanian language. --Babu (talk) 17:03, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your reaction. We normally do not accept indirect permissions. Would it be possible for you and your friends to verify these permissions using Commons:OTRS? This is done to ensure that those releasing images know what they are releasing and to prevent to false permission claims. Basvb (talk) 17:12, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
I'll talk to my friends, but just for your information this system is rather heavy and discouraging. - --Babu (talk) 17:55, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
Yes I know OTRS is not always optimal. Another option, if the facebook pages are open to be seen by everybody, is that they publish the image with cc-by-sa in the description (or in a comment chain after asked if they release the image). Then Template:LicenseReview can be used to verify the permission. This option is prefered over OTRS (by me) if possible. Basvb (talk) 18:19, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
Thank you very much for this information. --Babu (talk) 18:22, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Photos of picture panels on Calea Victoriei

Latest comment: 7 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Babu, there might be problem with many of your uploads in Category:Walking on Calea Victoriei. Per Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Romania there is no freedom-of-panorama exception from copyright for photos installed in public space. In addition, it seems that these picture-panels are not permanently installed. Therefore, you need to research for each visible photographic image on these panels, who is the original photographer and when did he/she die. Alternatively, you need the information, when each image had been first-published/created and whether eventually the original copyright is already expired.

etc.
--Túrelio (talk) 09:13, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi Túrelio. Is true, these picture-panels are not permanently installed, but I am unable to do what you are saying, so please delete them or do what you're supposed to do. --Babu (talk) 09:36, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
The alternative that you gave me is also very hard to do, almost impossible. --Babu (talk) 09:57, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
I have no wish to delete these images, which are likely of value for Wikipedia and for history in general. However, we have to try to respect the copyright of its original authors. I think it should be possible for you (and would also be of value for the use of these images) to obtain information at least about the year of creation of the original images (when they have been shot). With the help of other users from :ro-Wikipedia you may then be able to determine — based on Romanian copyright-law — how long the copyright might last. As you shot these images yesterday, you could eventually still contact the people who put the original photos on these panels and who might have more information about them. --Túrelio (talk) 10:37, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
Indeed, the images are valuable for Wikipedia and especial for ro.Wikipedia. I'll try to follow your advice and - as this will last - please feel free to delete the pictures; I can upload them again after (and if) I'll manage to obtain needed information. Thank you for your helpful attitude. --Babu (talk) 13:37, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Affected:

Butterflies of Romania

Latest comment: 6 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Babu, thank you for your uploads of butterflies. Could you please add the species categories to them? I also want to inform you I had to recategorize a few pictures that are not from Romania, such as this one. Best regards --LamBoet (talk) 17:42, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

FYI I made a couple of corrections here: 1 2 3 4.--LamBoet (talk) 00:56, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
About these two 1 2, the blue basal sheen makes them look like C. osiris. Are you sure that they are minimus? (Have you seen the upperside of the wings?) --LamBoet (talk) 17:36, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Unfortunately, I'm not the author of the photos, I'm just the uploader. I've noticed that this one is similar with "my" Cupido minimus (the same blue basal sheen). But I'm not an expert. --Babu (talk) 18:44, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
They actually look quite different to me (much less blue, more minimus-like). Given the doubt, I prefer to label "your" pictures as "Cupido sp." --LamBoet (talk) 15:24, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Cats of Bucharest

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello. Wikimedia Commons is not facebook. Thanks. --Allforrous (talk) 15:05, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Please look better before make accusations, not me but another user upload cats photos, I've just corrected the category. - --Babu (talk) 15:16, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Affected:

Yours sincerely, Ubcule (talk) 14:29, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Gaudeamus

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello! I saw that you have renamed Category:Gaudeamus 2011 to Category:Gaudeaumus 2011, but the name of the fair is Gaudeamus, see the official website at gaudeamus.ro. The proper spelling of the term is also without any 'u' before the 'm', see en:Gaudeamus igitur. Razvan Socol (talk) 15:39, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Monthbyyear

Latest comment: 6 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hello Babu, you have added an extra "0" before the number of the month. The documentation of the Monthbyyear template advises to use just the number of the month - see the example. Sorting works well without extra zeros, the template adds a zero in front of month numbers that are under 10. --Estormiz (talk) 05:27, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Hello Estormiz. Plese see Category:2001 in Romania where the months aren't sort well. They are displayed correctly only if I add 0 in front of the months <10 --Babu (talk) 12:43, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
I removed the zeros and if look at the Category:2001 in Romania by month, you can see sorting works. Sorting also works in case there is no "Year by month" category, see Category:1998 in Romania. But in case the year category is mixed with pages with a zero and without zero, the sorting does not work. I guess it could be possible to alter the template so that it wouldn't matter which way one fills in the template code. --Estormiz (talk) 17:18, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
I understood. Thank you for your explanations. --Babu (talk) 19:03, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Government buildings in Bucharest

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Government_buildings_in_Bucharest&diff=321496606&oldid=83504092 seems wrong to me. Nearly all of these are buildings of the national government; only a couple are part of the government of Bucharest. - Jmabel ! talk 15:41, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

It's true. Changes reverted. --Babu (talk) 15:56, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Pliant pro-referendum fata.jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Pliant pro-referendum fata.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: derivative of poster
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Túrelio (talk) 19:11, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Pliant pro-referendum verso.jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Pliant pro-referendum verso.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Strainu (talk) 13:57, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Wish

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello. Help improve for [1]. Thanks you.125.214.50.74 12:25, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

File:2017 Agricola-Fonciera Building Bucharest (crop).jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:2017 Agricola-Fonciera Building Bucharest (crop).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

De728631 (talk) 15:05, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Affected:

Yours sincerely, De728631 (talk) 15:51, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Affected:

Yours sincerely, De728631 (talk) 16:00, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

File:PNL alegeri europarlamentare 2019 (1).jpg

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:PNL alegeri europarlamentare 2019 (1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:48, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Affected:

Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:49, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Babu/Archive_1&oldid=735882215"
Return to the user page of "Babu/Archive 1".