Arkelin

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Arkelin!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:51, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:Bologna Musei 202002.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Bologna Musei 202002.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Bologna Musei 202002.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Ruthven (msg) 12:31, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

File:BWZ Brugg (Jürg Nänni).jpg

File:BWZ Brugg (Jürg Nänni).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 19:15, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

How to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category

When you want to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category, best practice is to mark it with {{SD|C2}} if it would be OK to re-create it in the future, given that appropriate content becomes available or {{SD|C1}} if it is an inappropriate category name that should not be reused. In particular, this is better practice than just blanking the category page, as you did at Category:Aareviadukt. ("C1" and "C2" come from Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion). Jmabel ! talk 23:27, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tote Reuss Amphibienlaichgebiet 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:42, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aarebrücke Koblenz-Felsenau Detail Nietverbindung.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 16:34, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

File:Installation «Wasserschloss» (Ueli Schneider1986).jpg

File:Installation «Wasserschloss» (Ueli Schneider1986).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 02:08, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

Chrümelbach

Hallo Arkelin, wie ich sehe, hast du Category:Chrümelbach zugunsten von Category:Chrümelbach (Oesch) geleert, und das scheint auch ganz richtig zu sein, da es, wie ich bei Swisstopo sehe, bei Schwarzenberg LU auch einen Chrümelbach gibt. Was machen wir nun mit Category:Chrümelbach? Ich kann sie vorerst einfach löschen; sobald wir auch Bilder vom anderen Chrümelbach haben, wäre eine Kategorien-Begriffsklärung {{Disambig}} denkbar. Was meinst du? Gestumblindi (talk) 00:51, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

PS: In der deutschen Wikipedia habe ich gerade die Begriffsklärung de:Chrümelbach angelegt, da solche dort ja auch mit Rotlinks erwünscht sind. Hier auf Commons glaube ich aber, dass Kategorien-Begriffsklärungen für noch gar nicht existierende Kategorien (und leere sollten nicht angelegt werden) nicht üblich/erwünscht sind. Gestumblindi (talk) 00:57, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

Und PPS: Danke für den Artikel! Gestumblindi (talk) 00:58, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

Guten Tag Gestumblindi. Über genau diese Dinge habe ich auch nachgedacht, und dann noch geschaut, ob der Luzerner Bach auf irgend einem Bild bei Commons zu sehen ist, was leider nicht der Fall ist. Es ist eher unwahrscheinlich, dass über jenes unscheinbare Gewässer bald ein Artikel entsteht, und so kann die leere Kategorie gelöscht werden. Der BKL-Artikel hat inzwischen ein Wikidata-Objekt erhalten, das genügt für den Moment. Arkelin (talk) 09:55, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

OK, danke, so gemacht. Das reizt mich natürlich, den Luzerner Chrümelbach mal aufzusuchen ;-) - manchmal habe ich solche Anwandlungen, siehe etwa hier ;-) (ups, das ist schon 10 Jahre her?) Gestumblindi (talk) 21:28, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Hallo Gestumblindi. Das verstehe ich gut, und das von dir erwähnte Beispiel hat mich sogar einmal ähnlich angesprochen, was jetzt einen neuen Artikel (und dort einen Rotlink weniger) ergeben hat. Ich suchte damals Bilder vom finsteren Graben mit dem Bach selbst... Arkelin (talk) 11:24, 13 November 2024 (UTC)