User talk:Archaeodontosaurus/Deuxième trimestre 2012

C'est l'printemps !

!!

bis!!

Poisson d'avril !--Jebulon (talk) 23:18, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

• Merci de cette perche amicalement tendue. J'ai fait une conférence Jeudi je vais te l'envoyer elle vaut surtout par la page de garde... Bon mois d'avril!--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:29, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

• Dîtes donc, c'est tôt pour les poissons d'avril ! --Myrabella (talk) 07:43, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hirtobrasilianus villiersi, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support All criteria satisfied. High quality focus stack. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 17:00, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 08:58, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pachyptila salvini (Salvin's Prion), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support All criteria met. Totodu74 (talk) 09:12, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 06:29, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Holocnemus pluchei (marbled cellar spider), Male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best for the scope. Yann (talk) 13:17, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:51, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ialyssus tuberculatus, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support All criteria met. Totodu74 (talk) 12:52, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:03, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pelecanoides georgicus (South Georgia Diving Petrel), egg..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. Yann (talk) 06:58, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 12:38, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Charaxes solon (Black Rajah).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope, most detailed --Llez (talk) 13:14, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:08, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pelecanoides urinatrix, (Common Diving Petrel), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Alone in its scope, high illustrative value. Totodu74 (talk) 19:37, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
  •  Comment Commons:Valued image candidates/Pelecanoides urinatrix Gould.jpg =) Totodu74 (talk) 19:45, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:57, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Galeries et catégories

Bonjour mon ami. Merci de tes commentaires sur mon Gaston.

J'ai donc créé la galerie, reliée d'ailleurs à plusieurs catégories, du coup.

Ma question: une fois la galerie créée, faut-il retirer de la catégorie les images qu'on y a placées, ou les laisse-t-on, tant dans la catégorie que dans la galerie ? Je m'interroge... Pour une sous-catégorie, je retirerais pour éviter la redondance et la sur-catégorisation, mais pour une galerie ?--Jebulon (talk) 14:45, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

• Très bien ce Gaston, bien que mes préférence aillent plutôt vers celui de Franquin. Non il faut tout laisser en l’état. c'est très bien comme tu l'as fait. Puis que tu détoures bien tu pourrais essayer un fond dégradé pour faire ressortir le sujet. Regarde les oeufs ils ont l'air de flotter. Fais quelques essais tu verras bien... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
• J'ai compris pour les galeries. Du coup, j'ai "galerisé" le casque de Skanderbeg, et la selle de parade. J'ai découvert un autre intérêt aux galeries, c'est qu'on peut les lier à plusieurs catégories, ce qui est tout bénéfice en terme d'exposition et de "vitrine". C'est plus "souple" que les sous-catégories, je trouve. Je m'attendais à cette référence, j'ai failli la faire moi-même, m'enfin! Mais j'aurais aussi pensé que tu évoquerais ce Gaston-là, rapport au pays... Mon Gaston à moi était tout aussi f..teur de m... que le tien, ceci dit. J'aime bien aussi mon petit Louis XIV de cinq ans, il est attachant, surtout quand on sait ce qu'il va devenir (nous, on le sait, mais l'artiste, lui, n'en avait aucune idée, évidemment. Il nous montre un enfant-roi, qui aurait aussi bien pu mourir le lendemain. Je trouve ça émouvant)... Je vais essayer les dégradés, OK. Fais-moi un bref tuto d'explication, alors. Merci de tes conseils et avis, en tous cas.--Jebulon (talk) 09:10, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hamadryas feronia (Variable Cracker), male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:10, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 08:02, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Halobaena caerulea (Blue Petrel), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support. Criteria met -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:13, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 08:09, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Parides vertumnus (Vertumnus Cattleheart), male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:17, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 07:10, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Macronectes giganteus (Southern Giant Petrel), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Valued image for me. Totodu74 (talk) 14:58, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 19:23, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Wing scales or JPEG artefacts?

Hi Archaeodontosaurus:

Could you please clarify whether these are wing scales or JPEG artefacts. A similar discussion raised here too. Jkadavoor (talk) 05:47, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

• I looked at your image with detail, and the type of equipment you use. There are many artefec JPG compression. To resolve this problem it would be good that you make the shots in RAW if your camera allows. Otherwise use the minimum compression when you save. Bravo for your work is very good, you are now an important member of our community.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:35, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

• Thanks for the review and encouraging words. Jkadavoor (talk) 08:45, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

• Is the other image [1] also has same issues? This is a photo of same butterfly from a famous photographer for comparison: [2] Jkadavoor (talk) 09:00, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

The errors are less obvious but there it is possible that this is a problem parameter of Neat Image. I do not know much about this software. With photoshop I do not have this type of anomaly if I treat areas of independent ways.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:03, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

I confirm: I tried Neat Image! It was he who generates errors. Shoot in RAW and you can correct images for the exhibition, chromatic aberrations and noise ...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:20, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for the info; will try to use Gimp or Photoshop. Regards, Jkadavoor (talk) 15:13, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Syrrhaptes paradoxus (Pallas's Sandgrouse), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support All criteria met --Llez (talk) 19:28, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 19:18, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Détourage

Merci pour la leçon ! C'est très intéressant et me sera très utile.--Jebulon (talk) 11:01, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Je viens de mettre ça en QI et en FP. C'est un bien curieux objet, kitsch a souhait, avec une belle histoire. Je me suis vraiment fait... à détourer correctement, mais j'ai suivi tes conseils, et je crois que le résultat est plutôt pas mal. Je te le dédie bien amicalement, avec mes remerciements renouvelés.--Jebulon (talk) 14:26, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

L’effet général est bon. Le noir est peu être un peu sombre tu aurais pu faire un gris.

A 100% Quelques anomalies de détrourage sur la tête des deux enfants du bas le panier de celui de gauche a aussi un petit problème. Enfin il y a du côté droit une petite anomalie sur la base. La tablette graphique n’est pas un achat trop onéreux mais le confort et la précision y gagne.

Pour le fond à 100% tu as des bandes trop visibles. Une fois que tu as ton fond tu peux demander à ton programme soit d’enlever le bruit de fond, soit de faire un floue de surface pour lisser le tout. A toi de faire des essais. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:36, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Je vins de lire les comentaires sur QI. Tous ce focalisent sur le fond. Un bon fond c'est celui qu'on ne voit pas. Il doit manifier l'objet sans attirer l'attention. Le fond pour l'oeuf qui est au-dessus est dans ce cas. en fait tu pourait peut-être essayer deux gris et non du blanc et noir...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:07, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

j'ai un autre problème, c'est celui de sauvegarder l'objet détouré (décidément, je vais continuer à tout fair à la main...), pour pouvoir l'essayer sur des fonds différents. À chaque fois, ça ne me sauvegarde pas la transparence, et ça m'oblige à tout recommencer. Je voudrais pouvoir garder dans un coin l'objet détouré, et ensuite, le lendemain par exemple, essayer plusieurs fonds. Je dois louper quelque chose au niveau des calques...--Jebulon (talk) 12:40, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

• Pour photoshop il n'y a pas de problème, je suis sûr que pour ton programme aussi, il suffit de choisir un fond transparent, ou de sauvegarder seulement l'objet post détrourage. Si tu n'as pas trouvé cette commande, le plus simple est de faire un fond blanc ou noir et la baguette magique te permettra de reprendre le travail sans gros efforts. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:38, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
  • Info: avec GIMP, le mieux est de sauvegarder le travail en cours sous .png, ça conserve la transparence. En tous cas, maintenant, je ne détoure plus qu'avec ton système de calques, c'est bien plus propre, et permet plus facilement de faire évoluer les couleurs de fond en cas de nécessité d'ajustement. Mais j'en reste au détourage "à la main", sans "baguette magique" ni autre, car je n'en suis jamais satisfait. Je n'exclus pas la tablette graphique toutefois, il faudra que j'essaye.--Jebulon (talk) 15:03, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
    • La baguette est pratique pour le gros oeuvre, il faut adapter sa sensibilité au coup par coup, mais je confirme qu'il faut finir "à la main". Désolé pour ta pièce de porcelaine en FP, je suis arrivé trop tard pour le vote. Je ne suis pas très assidu se qui m'a valu parfois de ne pas voter pour mes images mise en place par Citron. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:47, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Parides chabrias ygdrasilla (Chabrias Cattleheart), female..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --MrPanyGoff 18:14, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 11:40, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Masséna et nanisme

Perspective correction scale correction sont les deux mamelles d'une VI réussie. J'ai dû oublier la deuxième partie.
Merci de m'avoir rappelé à l'ordre.
 Done.
Ceci dit, c'était plutôt un sale type, mais c'est amusant que le duc de Rivoli ait sa statue sur la rue du même nom...--Jebulon (talk) 10:40, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Streptopelia turtur (European Turtle Dove), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Criteria met. Totodu74 (talk) 11:28, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 07:06, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Danaus eresimus eresimus MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good --Llez 17:28, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Poisson?

Hello, Archaeodontosaurus. You have new messages at PierreSelim's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--PierreSelim (talk) 06:36, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oena capensis (Namaqua Dove), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --The High Fin Sperm Whale 18:47, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 19:33, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Danaus plexippus (Monarch Milkweed), male..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support We have al lot of pictures of living animals, but this is the only which shows the complete expanse of the wings and both sides. Perhaps one should make a second scope for in vivo shots (or here add "Museum specimen"). --Llez (talk) 09:05, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
• Well said. I started a discussion, last few days, with Slaunger on this subject in suggesting "Mounted specimen". I have images potentially in conflict. I expect his opinion.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 08:36, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

VI

Masséna est ma centième "Image de Valeur". Je te remercie de ta persévérance à m'avoir cornaqué dans ce difficile chemin, et de m'avoir incité à poursuivre malgré mes multiples bouderies.--Jebulon (talk) 14:17, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

N'oubli pas les autres maréchaux sur la même façade... As-tu seulement remarqué que tu boudais moins?.. J'en suis, pour ma part, tout-à-fais convaincu. :) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:21, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Je ne boude que si on m'incite, forcément ! Les autres maréchaux (et généraux) sur la même façade sont plus difficiles à prendre que celui-là, qui est bien placé. Il y a Hoche juste à côté, je n'ai pas réussi à en tirer quoi que ce soit de potable. Et tous ont déjà été (bien) faits...--Jebulon (talk) 14:43, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Et mon truc à moi, c'est de me balader de sujet en sujet (je dirais bien "papillonner", mais c'est justement inapproprié en la circonstance...). Je ne suis pas comme ces monomaniaques de la pierre taillée, de l'oeuf, ou du papillon, moi... Je me diversifie, moi... J'originalise, moi...Je disperse, je ventile, façon puzzle, moi... Tiens, au fait, le temps se couvre: WS réapparait timidement en FP... On n'aura pas été tranquilles longtemps...--Jebulon (talk) 14:47, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

J'avais également remarqué cette renaissance...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:45, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stalachtis phaedusa (female).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support All criteria met --Llez (talk) 11:58, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 19:34, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Streptopelia orientalis (Oriental Turtle Dove), egg..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Criteria satisfied. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 17:25, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 19:37, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Historis acheronta acheronta MHNT.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Historis acheronta acheronta MHNT.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Encore bravo ! Mais il est vrai que la mise au point pourrait être meilleure. amicalement--Citron (talk) 15:16, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

• Merci à toi. Cette image marque deux tournants : c'est la 50e FP, et surtout j'ai abandonné le focks staking de photoshop pour revenir à Combine ZP qui donne de meilleur résultat. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:39, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Junonia evarete, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met. Your picuters are really very encyclopedic, thanks for them! -- Podzemnik (talk) 13:23, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 18:54, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Danaus plexippus MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 09:17, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

HOMMAGE

	The Multi FP Barnstar
	En hommage à ta CINQUANTIEME (50 !!!) Image Remarquable (This man has uploaded fifty (50) FP on "Commons" !!). --Jebulon (talk) 16:51, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

• Je t’en remercie bien vivement. Ce succès est en fait un travail de groupe, beaucoup de ces images n’auraient pas été promues si elles n’avaient été présentées par nos amis. Je reste timoré pour la présentation aux concours sauf en VI. Au passage : 1234 images promues QI par tes bons soins, relève d’un exploit bien plus conséquent. L’aventure continue… --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:40, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
  •  Info J'en suis désormais à près de 1300, j'ai laissé 1-2-3-4 à cause de la succession de chiffres, ça faisait joli. Le prochain changement d'annonce sera donc à 1313 . Et je ne considère pas ça vraiment comme des "concours" à proprement parler, plutôt comme des "validations" ou des "reconnaissances" par d'autres que moi, au bénéfice des futurs utilisateurs, qui savent ainsi qu'ils peuvent faire "confiance" à l'image qui leur est proposée. Mais je voulais que ta performance soit connue au degré qu'elle mérite, au moins par ceux qui viennent visiter ta page !! A propos de nos amis, je pense que tu as vu qu'hélas, nous venons d'en perdre un, et non des moindres...--Jebulon (talk) 08:03, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
• Mes félicitations pour cette cinquantième image remarquable, c'est vraiment impressionnant. Pourvu que ça continue ! Tant que j'y suis, bravo également à toi Jebulon, autant de QI,, ça impose l'admiration ! --Citron (talk) 09:27, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nesoenas picturata (Malagasy Turtle Dove) egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Criteria met. -- Podzemnik (talk) 13:18, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 07:24, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Téviec à Paris

Bonjour Archaeod.,
Aujourd'hui, j'étais au Palais de la Découverte à Paris et à l'occasion d'une exposition temporaire, j'ai pu voir de mes yeux la sépulture de Téviec que j'avais découverte grâce à tes images (dont une de tes belles FP !). Tout comme des objets de la collection d'Emile Cartailhac, et même des nucléus que je n'aurais jamais remarqués si tu ne m'en avais appris le rôle et l'importance... par une VI. Amitiés, --Myrabella (talk) 21:49, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Je te remercie de ce petit mot. L'expo est effectivement importante, pour l'histoire de la préhistoire, où l'on voit que la France et Toulouse ont joué un rôle déterminant. Cette expo devrait, après Paris, partir au Transvaal Museum à Pretoria, où je devrais l'accompagner...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:47, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Junonia genoveva (Mangrove Buckeye), male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Far better than the one and only "in vivo"-picture we have. --Llez (talk) 10:10, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 10:43, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Teviec

Also replied on my page. I see both "6740 - 5680BP" and "6740-5680 before CE" being mentioned, the latter on the front page - a discrepancy. JMK (talk) 13:57, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gyps africanus (White-backed Vulture), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Alone in scope, therefore the best, but very illustrative image. All criteria met.--Jebulon (talk) 15:43, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 17:31, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jupoata rufipennis MHNT femelle 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 08:41, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jupoata rufipennis, female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support The only picture of the species. --Ximonic (talk) 19:14, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:55, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lasiophila orbifera male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:33, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:27, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Metilia brunnerii

Hallo Archaeodontosaurus. In the picture the forelegs are bent ventral so that it looks as if tibia and tarsus are cut off and lacking. The other legs are also bent and mostly covered by the wings so that their structure is also not well visible. I think an additional ventral view would solve the problem (as in the butterflies, where you mostly offer dorsal and ventral view). Greetings --Llez (talk) 06:40, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your comment. It is quite true. The flight position is not ideal to see the legs. I do not find this species in the reference position closed wings. In fact it is the scope that was misstated. I will add "flight position". --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:17, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Leodonta tellane, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --MrPanyGoff 06:21, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 06:37, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

VIC Calopteryx virgo meridionalis

Hallo Archaedontosaurus, in gastropods we have on the one hand the living specimen and at the other hand the shell. Both are of scientific value, and therefore we discern between the animal an the shell. The same we do in VIC, where we have a scope for the animal (species name alone) and the shell (species name with he addition "shell"). I think the same we should do in insects. We have the living specimen (and photos of living specimens), and we have the mounted Museum specimes, which are prepared for scientific purposes. I think, this are two different things. Shouldn't we discern them in the same way as the gastropods? The scope "species name" (with male/female, subspecies added if necessary), and an extra scope for mounted Museum specimens (with the additon "mounted specimen" or Museum specimen"). It is often hard to decide, which photo to prefer, the living specimen or the mounted. If you have only pictures of mounted representatives, the decision is easy, but a competition between living and mounted specimens, is it necessary? Also in this case: The addition "Museum specimen" or "Mounted specimen" would make the decision much more easier. What do you think about the idea of at least two different scopes in general for insect species? --Llez (talk) 06:59, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

• I totally agree, from now on I'll add "Mounted specimen". I change scopes in progress. Thank you for your advice.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:53, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Metilia brunnerii male, flight position..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support All criteria met --Llez (talk) 14:55, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:37, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alectoris graeca (Rock Partridge), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Llez (talk) 05:51, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:37, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eueides lybia lybia MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Definitely QI --MLWatts 09:35, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Calopteryx virgo meridionalis female, mounted specimen..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support All criteria met --Llez (talk) 16:14, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:58, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Magneuptychia harpyia male, mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support All criteria met --Llez (talk) 16:16, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:01, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mionochroma aureotinctum, male, mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support All criteria met --Llez (talk) 18:52, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:04, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agraulis vanillae vanillae MHNT ventre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 06:51, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

I use some of your photos

Hi Didier!

I have use a photo of Necora puber and one of Alligator mississippiensis from wikimedia in my free software educational proyect "Animalandia" (http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia)

You can see directy in the follow links and click over "Siguiente" ("Next") several times:

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/imagen.php?id=30833

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/imagen.php?id=33481

If you wish, you can send me some letters or/and a photo for your "contributor card" in Animalandia:

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Didier Descouens

This is my "contributor card", for example:

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Fernando Lis�n Mart�n

In the future, I use more of your photos, I sure!

Thank you for the licence and, of course, for your splendid photos!! Regards! Fernando Lisón

Llené el formulario. Es un placer trabajar con la difusión del conocimiento. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:09, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Raptrix perspicua, male, mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support All criteria met --Llez (talk) 21:22, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 08:08, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Colour Balance

Bonjour Didier, Many of my Nikon images have a pink or sometimes blue background. [3] Is it easy to correct this? Also does Toulouse museum have any insect models made by Maison Auzoux [4]. There are some in Strasbourg [5] but my freind (wiki) was too shy to ask for a permission. Best regards Robert aka Notafly (talk) 20:24, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Merci bien Didier You might also be interested in this [6] for help with old labels. It is cold in Ireland today but warm regards Robert aka Notafly (talk) 16:18, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Memphis phantes vicinia, male, mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Criteria satisfied. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 00:06, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 19:41, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stagmatoptera flavipennis,male, mounted specimen, flying position..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Llez (talk) 06:05, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 10:22, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Taxons

Bonjour. J'ai supprimé les pages qui utilisaient les petites boîtes taxons, vu que ça n'avait par l'air de plaire à grand monde. J'espèrais qu'il y aurait un jour un moyen beaucoup plus simple pour faire les traductions et les liens, et le projet Wikidata a l'air vraiment prometteur. Mais il faudra attendre encore au moins six mois avant de l'utiliser. En attendant {{Specimen}} est bien pratique, et la transition devrait être facile ensuite. --Zolo (talk) 07:58, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

• Tu as parfaitement fait. J'ai adopter le modèle {{Specimen}} qui marche très bien. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:30, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Category

Hi Archaeodontosaurus - File:Vautour moine MHNT.jpg does not show a live, wild individual. It shows a specimen that has been captured and placed in a museum. Therefore it belongs in the captive category. If it had shown an egg in its natural position in a nest in nature, it would be a different matter. But it doesn't. - MPF (talk) 23:12, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

I understand your idea but:

This is an egg taken from the wild, by naturalist Rene de Naurois, who donated it to the ornitologue Jacques Perrin de Brichambaut. Eggs from breeding or zoo are perfectly identified. The mention Aegypius monachus (captive) can not place holder. The spots on the eggs of captive forms are much less visible. Best regards. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:31, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ciconia ciconia (White Stork), egg..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Llez (talk) 19:14, 7 May 2012 (UTC) All citeria met --Llez (talk) 19:14, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 09:55, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Melinaea ludovica, male, mounted specimen..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support All criteria met --Llez (talk) 10:24, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 09:55, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Coturnix coturnix ( Common Quail), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:17, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 18:53, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fondaco dei Turchi (Natural History Museum of Venice) (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope though I think the scope should be either „Fondaco dei Turchi, Venice (exterior)“ or „Natural History Museum, Venice (exterior)“. --MrPanyGoff 19:57, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

• I agree...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 20:22, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 18:56, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Hafnium crystal bar

Hi Archaeodontosaurus, I uploaded a new version. It is better now? Please take a look again. Merci, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:29, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Yes, it is far much better ! :)) --Jebulon (talk) 20:41, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Orthoptera genus Tropidacris

Hello Achaeodontosaurus,
while giving taxonavigation boxes to genus Tropidacris, I found there 2 species that are not listed at Orthoptera species file:

1. Category:Tropidacris violaceus: perhaps it has been renamed to another genus?
2. Category:Tropidacris alleipes: These images do not show a Tropidacris at all, but some spiny Ensifera species. Do you know what this could be?

Thanks for you help, with regards --Thiotrix (talk) 08:38, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

• I am not a connoisseur in Orthoptera but I posed the question to our curator of entomology Toulouse Museum. Best regards --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:51, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Parastagmatoptera flavoguttata, male, mounted specimen..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Llez (talk) 05:36, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 10:44, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Papilio hesperus, male, mounted specimen..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support All criteria met. --Bgag (talk) 11:48, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 10:45, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Plocaederus bipartitus, female, mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support All criteria met --Llez (talk) 22:06, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 11:08, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pareuptychia lydia, male, mounted specimen..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support All criteria met --Llez (talk) 12:51, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 19:08, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Praxithea travassosi MHNT male 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Iifar 09:53, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fondaco dei Tedeschi 2012-05-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:41, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galet peint MHNT.PRE.MAZ.15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:24, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

VI Neuschwanstein

ça y est ! C'était bien mon intention, mais je ne maîtrise pas bien le bazar, fallait me laisser le temps de finir !!

C'est justement l'objet de la manoeuvre. Comme il y a eu de graves étripages à ce sujet en FP, j'ai pensé que VI pourrait dénouer le noeud gordien.

Je crois que j'ai mal placé le truc dans la liste, et je pensais qu'il fallait d'abord les placer en VI "normale" avant de les mettre en MVR. Enfin bref, ça me parait opérationnel maintenant.

On va bien voir.

Tiens, ça te ferait un bon exercice, d'écrire dix lignes de "Neuschwanstein Hohenschwangau", je te fais grâce du "Marienbrücke", c'est trop facile.

Amitiés --Jebulon (talk) 16:56, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Callipepla californica (California Quail), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support all criteria met -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:22, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 23:29, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Papilio peranthus adamantius.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:20, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 23:30, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiesa di San Martino (Venezia).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 13:35, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Il pleut mais çà ira...

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Philaethria pygmalion MHNT.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Philaethria pygmalion MHNT.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

• C’est vendredi, je ne fais pas le pont, il pleut, j’ai des dossiers en retards, bref début de journée médiocre. Sauf qu’à l’ouverture de Commons je vois que tu as encore frappé et je te dois une nouvelle promotion en FP. Du cout tout bascule, ma jauge d’énergie remonte, avec mon moral.
• Meric. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Mais non, le 18 mai est forcément un jour merveilleux, puisque c'est mon anniversaire ! Logique ! Cet FP est amplement méritée et je repars en soumettre d'autres ! Bravo !

Concernant, le projet MNNHN, je n'ai toujours pas de nouvelles d'Adrienne, je vais relancer tout ça...--Citron (talk) 16:18, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Moi non plus je ne fais pas le pont, j'ai bossé hier et j'y retourne demain et dimanche, même pas sûr d'avoir le temps de charger deux ou trois photos.... Bon anniversaire à Citron quand même !--Jebulon (talk) 19:31, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais Bembo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--ArildV 09:47, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiesa di San Pantalon facade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vassil 17:34, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Re-Saffron Blaze

Il semble qu'il y ait eu un grave incident sur la page des FP de la wikipédia anglophone, qui s'est répercuté sur "Commons". J'ai ça :http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons_talk:Featured_picture_candidates&diff=71310927&oldid=71310874 (dans le cadre vert) qui peut aider à comprendre. En conséquence, j'ai compris qu'il a demandé lui-même sa radiation de tous les projets "Wikimedia". Mais je ne connais pas les raisons exactes. Il a encore un peu communiqué "anonymement" sous "ip" dans la page de discussion des FP, mais comme c'était hors sujet, ça a été radié, donc il est difficile d'en trouver trace. Il faudrait voir dans les FP de la ENWP quelle fut la nature exacte de l'incident, mais visiblement, ça a été très "chaud", au point de le faire partir. Comme quoi, les FP dans les wp nationales, c'est mauvais !!--Jebulon (talk) 15:01, 19 May 2012 (UTC)oUI? OB

Bonjour à vous deux, Ce n'est pas seulement à cause des FP, ici ou sur en:WP, mais aussi en raison d'une dispute sur quelle devait être l'image de tête de l'article sur le château d’Édimbourg dans la Wikipedia en anglais -> w:Talk:Edinburgh_Castle. Oui, on peut s'en désoler. --Myrabella (talk) 15:47, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Ira furor brevis est... C'est d'autant plus dommage que je lui donne raison. Merci de vos lumières. Bon dimanche à tous les deux --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:23, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

...Au travail, pour ce qui me concerne... J'en ai marre !--Jebulon (talk) 16:46, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Juiaparus batus, mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support All criteria met --Llez (talk) 21:24, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:01, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fondaco dei Tedeschi (Venice) exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope.--MrPanyGoff 10:59, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:02, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Salamandre tachetée

Hi Archaeodontosaurus, why are you added the museum info ( Projet Phoebus) to your Salamandre tachetée image? And what are the right geocoordinates from the "Etang de la Maourine, Toulouse, France"? The current geo tag is from the museum.

The Museum has an annex in botany in an area of ​​the city there are still a pond. This part can also be visited for the public.

I hesitate to put the coordinates of the Museum Annex. The photo was made in the studio at the museum but the animal "lives" in the pond. I put the coordinates of the "annex-pond". Thank you for your interest ... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:56, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Papilio peranthus kangean MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 08:10, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Parides aeneas didas female, mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Criteria satisfied. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 03:39, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 11:45, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statue of Paolo Sarpi by Emilio Marsili (Venice)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Oppose Image does not illustrate the entire monument, only the statue and top half of the pedestal. cmadler (talk) 12:52, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
• Indeed, only the statue is made by Emilio Marsili, I change the scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:45, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
•  Support in the new scope. cmadler (talk) 18:37, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 11:46, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chrysolophus pictus ( Golden Pheasant), egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Criteria met -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:42, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 11:47, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiesa di San Biagio (Venice).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. -- JLPC 06:51, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

en:Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Émile Cartailhac

Hello Archaeodontosaurus. Can you respond in en:Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Émile Cartailhac? Tomer T (talk) 05:54, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Poekilloptera phalaenoides, mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All citeria met--Llez (talk) 07:32, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 08:09, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pedaliodes hewitsoni, male, mounted spcecimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All citeria met--Llez (talk) 07:33, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 08:09, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pietro Paleocapa (venise).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. Already useful on P.P.'s page. -- JLPC 21:02, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

D'Artagnan

La bouteille sous le bras est elle d'époque? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:29, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Content que tu l'aies remarquée . Elle ne ressemble pas à une bouteille d'armagnac, je pense donc qu'on peut la ranger dans la catégorie des facéties dues aux élèves du très voisin lycée Carnot. As-tu vu (et l'exploit sportif est bien plus remarquable), qu'Alexandre Dumas sur l'autre photo avait aussi la sienne au creux du bras ?

Je me fais plus rare en QI, je commence à en avoir marre du "flooding" des trains écossais trop sombres et du "spamming" des maisons même pas belles du district de Lörrach... C'est une encyclopédie, ici, qu'on essaie de bâtir, ou quoi ? Pfff...

Amitiés,--Jebulon (talk) 15:30, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Ta longue garde a laissée des traces, regarde les côtés positifs. Il y a des "nouveaux" arrivant (en plus francophone). Il va faire beau et tu vas pouvoir repartir en chasse... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palazzo Corner Contarini dei Cavalli (Venice) (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support File:Palais Corner Conarini dei Cavalli.JPG shows a bit more of the building, and gives maybe a better idea of the whole palace, but the technical quality of our candidate is far much better ( geocode). (forgot to sign, sorry)--Jebulon (talk) 21:46, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
•  Support It's the best one for me too. --Bgag (talk) 21:48, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 22:43, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Merci pour votre attention

Merci d'être revenu vers ma photo d'épiphyllum après substitution de ma part. Il est toujours satisfaisant de retenir l'attention de quelqu'un qui domine son (ses) sujet(s). Par ailleurs, vous m'avez rappelé à la notion d'utilité que j'avais un peu perdue de vue durant mes six premiers mois de Wikipédien. Il faut dire que je m'étais cantonné à des domaines très étroits et que j'ignorais les pages où l'on critique les photos et où l'on en parle (en principe). J'ai découvert ces pages voilà un peu plus de trois semaines et je revois complètement ma façon d'utiliser mon APN en regardant (de près) beaucoup d'images, dont les vôtres. -- J'ai été accueilli par Jebulon, lequel n'est pas non plus un mauvais exemple ; il m'a donné quelques conseils avec beaucoup de gentillesse. -- Je termine par une question : ma photo intitulée (maladroitement) "Ail ornemental_St-Amant" ayant été classée IQ, m'est-il possible de demander un renommage plus scientifique, même après coup ? Répondez si vous en avez le temps. Merci encore. JLPC (talk) 08:04, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

On a tous été « accueilli » par nos ainés qui nous ont guidés. Moi c’étais George Chernilevsky, que l’on ne voit plus assez souvent dans nos colonnes. Dans quelques temps, je ne doute pas que tu assureras aussi ce rôle. On peut effectivement renommer ton fichier il suffit de me donner le nouveau nom et je renomme. Dans quelques temps tu seras aussi dépositaire de cette fonction. Ceci fait ta photo d’ Allium atropurpureum pourrait concourir sur VI. Bonne journée.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:53, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Je me suis aussi attardé sur les photos de George Chernilevsky il y a quelques jours, non sans plaisir. Pour ce qui est de l'accueil des nouveaux, j'espère pouvoir donner à mon tour... si le temps me le permet (je fais partie des "seniors"). -- Merci de bien vouloir renommer mon fichier en : "Allium_ atropurpureum_2012", le nom latin pour les utilisateurs éventuels, la date pour moi. Je pensais effectivement proposer ma photo dans une autre catégorie : pourquoi pas VI ? Merci de ta suggestion, j'essaierai de faire les choses comme il faut... Bien cordialement. JLPC (talk) 13:33, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Ce sera compliqué la première fois, c'est biscornu comme tout de proposer une image en VI ! Pas grave, on est là !! (eh oui, les pages d'utilisateur étant publiques, il est commun pour un tiers d'y intervenir, même sans avoir été invité. Donc, il faut faire attention à ce qu'on y écrit ! -et merci pour les compliments- ) --Jebulon (talk) 13:53, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Nouveaux remerciements, pour avoir renommé mon fichier, pour l'avoir modifié comme il convient et soutenu par ton vote. J'ai eu quelques difficultés mais tout est en ordre et j'ai appris un processus supplémentaire. -- Bien d'accord pour le côté éphémère de notre participation à Wikipédia. Il rend absurdes les querelles d'egos, comme dans la vraie vie. -- Pour ce qui est de la valeur purement encyclopédique des photos, je dois effectuer, là aussi, une profonde remise en question, mais elle est nécessaire... Je pars en week-end et j'espère faire des photos utiles. -- Bien cordialement. JLPC (talk) 15:24, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

VIC Euphorbia knuthii

Hallo Archaeodontosaurus, thank you for reviewing the VIC. According to the rules I inform you, that I changed the scope. I got a hint by Ies, that the depicted specimen of the Jardin de Cactus is misidentified, it is tagged as E. knuthii, but is in reality a E. uhligiana. I changed the scope, the category, the descriptionpage, and demanded the file-renaming according to this information. Could you please review again? Greetings --Llez (talk) 11:48, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiesa di San Martino - Faciata- Ponte dei Penini.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fine! --Keymeulen 15:10, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Salamandra salamandra MHNT 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Salamandra salamandra MHNT 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Quel succès !--Citron (talk) 10:05, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

• Merci; celle là je n'y avais pas pensé. Non pas quelle ne soit pas réussi, mais elle m'avait donné un peu de mal... et des plaques rouges sur la peau car j'ai un peu négligé les toxines en la manipulant... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:42, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pterodictya reticularis, mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Llez (talk) 11:03, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:42, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pareuptychia metaleuca, male, mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Criteria satisfied. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 01:30, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:47, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Girolamo (Venice) (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best out of two images.--MrPanyGoff 08:13, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:48, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statue of Pietro Paleocapa in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Paris 16 (talk) 21:43, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 07:30, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palazzo Michiel del Brusà.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice! -- MJJR 06:25, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stagmatoptera supplicaria, both sex, mounted specimens..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Llez (talk) 16:16, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 22:18, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of San Biagio (Venice) (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : good picture and best in scope.-- JLPC (talk) 21:41, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 07:04, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiesa di San Giuseppe di Castello.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:57, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pierella astyoche, mounted specimen..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Llez (talk) 04:14, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:03, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pierella lamia, male, mounted specimen..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Llez (talk) 04:15, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:05, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pierella hyalinus hyalinus MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 17:54, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canale di San Pietro di Castello.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pierella hyalinus, male, mounted specimen..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Meets all critera. -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 16:54, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 10:21, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Chiesa del Nome di Gesù

Vu ta proposition en VI de l'église susnommée. J'ai remarqué qu'une (très petite) partie du coin inférieur gauche de la photo 2 est manquante. De plus, il me semble possible de redresser très légèrement l'axe vers la droite sans pour autant mutiler le caisson du plafond menacé par cette opération. J'ai importé l'image et effectué la modification : ça marche. Je te signale la chose sans insister, pour pouvoir voter VI en toute quiétude ! -- Nouveaux remerciements pour Allium, ma première VI (!)surtout que la décision a été entérinée par George Chernilevsky ! -- Très cordialement. JLPC (talk) 12:56, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Bien vu! J'ai corrigé l'anomalie de perspective et le tilt. çà c'est de l'entraide. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:52, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

FPpromotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Dryadula phaetusa MHNT.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dryadula phaetusa MHNT.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Hop ! je t'ai envoyé un mail !--Citron (talk) 10:57, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dryas iulia alcionea MHNT ventre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice & useful --PierreSelim 12:46, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Basso (Venice) (Exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - The other good candidate is very distorted.--MrPanyGoff 08:14, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
•  Request heading parameter in location. Isn't obvious at this place. --88.65.190.202 12:17, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
• I confirm geocoding --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:24, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
  •  Done guessed heading. --Ikar.us (talk) 21:05, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:22, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria del Giglio (Venice) - Facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support All criteria met and best in scope. -- JLPC (talk) 06:27, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:23, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Neptis saclava male, mounted specimen --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:39, 28 May 2012 (UTC).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Paris 16 (talk) 06:46, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:25, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Othnacris surdaster, mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Paris 16 (talk) 06:42, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:28, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Les oeufs de Martin Ho

Salut,

Je dois avouer qu'à mon grand regret, je suis incapable de t'aider.

Je ne comprends rien à la controverse soulevée par ton contradicteur, ton expression me semble claire, concise, scientifique et détaillée, et ce n'est pas toi, mais lui, que je ne comprends pas, ni dans son argumentation, ni même dans les mots qu'il emploie...

Je vais mettre mon grain de sel, on va bien voir.--Jebulon (talk) 16:51, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Merci. Suite a ton intervention et celle de Georges nous avons eu quelques explications de la part de Mr Ho. Je ne l'ai ai pas compris non plus. Mais je suis rassuré...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:39, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pareuptychia hesionides, male, mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Paris 16 (talk) 08:22, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:23, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Renne et cerf

Bonjour, tu as bien sûr raison, je suis allée trop vite. Je corrige. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 13:31, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chiesa di San Simeone profeta - Venezia (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met and pretty good mise en abyme ! -- JLPC (talk) 13:25, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 11:51, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Campo Santa Maria Formosa - Palazzo Malipiero-Trevisan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 19:06, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Delichon urbicum (Common House Martin) eggs.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment A good picture, but somehow they look like chicken eggs with that close-up. --George Ho (talk) 20:49, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
•  Comment Ornithologists make the difference. Thank you kindly look at the size, texture of the shell, the form and color, all these parameters are different from a chicken egg. Just click here clutch single, taken for scientific purposes, and deposited in a public collection. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
  •  Question Can you elaborate? Your post... I don't know how to describe words without going strongly negative about it. --George Ho (talk) 08:43, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
•  Comment I'm sorry I did not write well in English. I tried to argue my point. I'm always afraid that Mr Google translate poorly or upside down my thoughts. I am only short sentences which can seem brutal. I hope I did not tell stupidity. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:02, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
•  Comment No, no, you did your best. You did tell me that chicken egg and the Martin egg are different. Nevertheless, why not re-phrase then? --George Ho (talk) 20:18, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
•  Support I don't understand the controversy. Here we have a "Common house martin" eggs picture, not chicken eggs at all (see the size and form, for instance, chicken eggs are bigger, even for a non specialist). The quality of the picture is not perfect (sharpness), but I think it is the best we have in "Commons" for this scope, and I support.--Jebulon (talk) 16:57, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
•  Support criteria met -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:25, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
•  Comment Earlier, I said that they look like "chicken eggs", but that was a miscommunication. To elaborate, I must say: this picture, regardless of real size of Martin eggs and indicator legend ("1 cm"), would make them look like chicken eggs. Ah, well, doesn't matter. --George Ho (talk) 01:04, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
  •  Comment As a non-ornithologist, I also find that they look to me like chicken eggs, only distinguished by size, which is only given by the legend. I am sure, however, that there are probably other distinctions that are not apparent to my untrained eye. cmadler (talk) 12:24, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
  • The form is not the same as that of a chicken egg. There are more pointed (the ratio between the height and width differs). The color is a very bright white, the chicken egg were never this color (except dietary deficiency). The texture is very smooth for an egg, if you enlarge a chicken egg at the same size there will be easy to see asperity. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:08, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 10:22, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tithrone roseipennis, mounted specimen, flying position..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Paris 16 (talk) 09:17, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 10:23, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Nouveau coup de main : merci !

Je viens de téléverser fruit et graines. J'ai ajouté un centimètre pour donner l'échelle à ta manière [je me demande d'ailleurs si le centimètre en question ne devrait pas figurer sur toutes les photos utiles, dans de nombreux domaines (fleurs, insectes, etc.)]. Mon ensemble est assez rustique, mais c'est un début. N'hésite pas à me faire savoir si la photo que j'ai rajoutée est contestable. Quoi qu'il en soit, merci encore. Très cordialement.JLPC (talk) 18:32, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Ton Set est maintenant parfait. Je te confirme qu’il est éminemment utile de donner l’échelle. Une alternative étant de donner les dimensions dans le texte, mais c’est lourd. (ex : Biface Silex Venerque MHNT PRE .2009.0.194.1 Fond.jpg).

Ta dernière image pourrait être améliorée pour le cadrage. En remontant l’échelle dans le coin gauche tu aurais pu couper le bas qui n’est pas très informatif. Cette remarque intéresse QI et peu VI. Tu progresse vite. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:48, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Je ne parle pas l'italien, mais grazie mille est parvenu jusqu'à moi. Grazie mille, donc. -- Dernière image modifiée en suivant tes conseils. Très cordialement. --JLPC (talk) 09:26, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Chiesa del Nome di Gesù, Venice.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Chiesa del Nome di Gesù, Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Scope d'une VI

Salut ! J'ai vu ta Commons:Valued image candidates/Phasianus colchicus MHNT.jpg, qui devrait passer sans problème mais dans le scope il faudrait changer le nom vernaculaire de « Fasan » pour « Common Pheasant », non ? ;) Amicalement, Totodu74 (talk) 08:06, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Ben t'as parfaitement raison j'ai corrigé discrètement y compris la légende dans la photo. J'ai eu beaucoup de peine a faire passer les oeufs d'hirondelles. Pour le Fossa j'ai des images de faces supérieure et inférieure. Penses-tu quelles soient utile? le Profil est bien...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:58, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Je viens de regarder Commons:Valued image candidates/Delichon urbicum MHNT.jpg, que je n'avais pas vu passer (je ne suis pas beaucoup Commons, sauf quand je viens uploader des dessins :o)). Le procès qu'on t'a fait est vache !

Pour ce qui est des images du fossa, vu leur qualité à mon humble avis tu peux les mettre sur Commons... Dans l'immédiat je ne pense pas les intégrer à l'article qui est déjà pas mal illustré, mais ça pourrait être utile un jour, ou sur un autre article (par exemple pour des comparaisons biométriques sur les crânes, etc., non ?) Totodu74 (talk) 09:12, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Anatomical World of Auzoux

Bonjour Didier I thought this would interest you [7] I see there are some models by Auzoux in the Veterinary College in Toulouse (École nationale vétérinaire de Toulouse) Warm regards Robert aka Notafly (talk) 17:51, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Yes, we have a photographer Commons at the Veterinary School of Toulouse meeting starts at who take pictures of models Auzoux. I hope he will continue ...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:33, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Philaethria pygmalion, male, mounted specimen..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support VI for me -- JLPC (talk) 07:49, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 09:34, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Giuseppe di Castello (Venice) (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Probably for lack of exterior people don't vote ;) --MrPanyGoff 05:37, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
• Damn but it's course. I repaired. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:01, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Gives more information in terms of its 3D appearance and situation.--MrPanyGoff 09:32, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 10:20, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiesa di Santa Caterina Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It's a QI.--Jebulon 10:19, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiesa di San Zaccaria Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--ArildV 17:16, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Piqué au vif !

Salut mon ami.

Tu as posté un commentaire, en lien avec ton soutien en FP de mon bassin du château de Champs-sur-Marne.

ça m'a trotté dans la tête, et j'ai mis un moment à trouver, mais bon, tu as enfin la réponse, pour cette image, et du coup, aussi, pour celle-là, tant qu'on y est ! J'ai bien sûr complété les descriptions et catégories.

Merci de m'avoir gentiment aiguillonné !!--Jebulon (talk) 16:05, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Voici une règle : "la durée de vie de nos images sur le Net, sera directement proportionnelle à la qualité de nos légendes" :) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:11, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Tu sais bien que, pour ma part, j'en suis convaincu! Mais ce n'est pas le cas de tout le monde, j'ai des noms !--Jebulon (talk) 18:12, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Cleone spinosa

Erreur : je m'étais contenté, étourdiment, de l'indication fournie par l'infobox de Wikipédia, laquelle indication est donc erronée. Un petit tour sur le net m'aurait permis de substituer "Jacq." à "L.". Je viens de rectifier mon erreur. -- La règle énoncée dans l'échange ci-dessus est bien sûr à méditer. D'autant plus qu'en ce qui me concerne j'ai découvert, cet après-midi même, une autre négligence de ma part, dans un tout autre domaine, mais précisément dans une légende. Merci encore ! -- Bien cordialement. --JLPC (talk) 19:45, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oleria ilerdina hermieri, male, mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Paris 16 (talk) 12:41, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 07:42, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Drawings as VICs

Hallo Archaedontosaurus, I made a note on Totodu74's talk page ([8] VI of birds). Could you please have a look on it? I think, we should differentiate between drawings and photos. --Llez (talk) 08:42, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Phasianus colchicus (Common Pheasant), egg..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  SupportAll criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 09:09, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 10:25, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiesa di Santa Maria della Visitazione (degli Artigianelli) Venezia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QIsn't it ? --JLPC 18:08, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Abbaye de Beauport

Bien. Après les erreurs de légende, je lis trop vite les règles d'utilisation des scopes : c'est l'âge ! -- Ta suggestion est évidemment raisonnable. Pour améliorer un peu l'ensemble, j'ai téléchargé ce soir un fichier de substitution. Il concerne la façade ouest et donne donne une vision plus large que la photo initiale. Je mettrai tes conseils en pratique demain... Cela dit, je ne sais comment te remercier de ton attention aux autres : c'est une qualité rare par les temps qui courent. Jebulon est le premier à m'avoir parlé de toi. Je constate que ses éloges étaient totalement justifiés. Votre accueil modifie beaucoup l'image de Wikipédia que je m'étais faite depuis septembre dernier. -- Fin des effusions. Très cordialement. -- JLPC (talk) 21:08, 10 June 2012 (UTC) -- P.S. : je viens de découvrir, sous ma fenêtre, une plante qui n'est pas encore wikipédiée (lien rouge) : Cuphea llavea. Premiers essais photo difficiles : la fleur a des parties d'un rouge qui semble défriser mon capteur !

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sant'Andrea della Zirada (Venice) (Exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. --MrPanyGoff 05:23, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:50, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marpesia orsilochus, male mounted specimen..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support All criteria met. Totodu74 (talk) 14:41, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 10:41, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ponte de Ca'Balà.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality(dust spot) --Moroder 09:42, 9 June 2012 (UTC)Thank you I corrected. --Archaeodontosaurus 10:05, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hirundo smithii (Wire-tailed Swallow) eggs.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --JLPC (talk) 08:22, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 10:33, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Beneto (Venice) (Exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 06:58, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:49, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Champs-sur-Marne

Merci de ta fidélité en FPC !

Tu l'as soutenue normale, et tu la soutiens retravaillée et surtout recoupée, c'est très aimable à toi.

Je suis encore en guerre contre Wladyslaw, je suis fatigué de me faire insulter sans devoir rien dire...--Jebulon (talk) 23:27, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Cette image est très bonne et elle a du sens. Ce n'est pas le cas de toutes celles que l'on voit passer. Dommage pour Wladyslaw qui ne met pas beaucoup de bonne volonté à chercher une réconciliation. Il y a des gens qui tirent leur énergie de ce type de conflit. Ne t'y investie pas trop tu n'as d'autre choix que le mépris ou l'humour, les deux ne sont pas incompatibles. :)--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Merci erreur

Merci une fois de plus pour ton/tes nouveaux soutien(s) en FP et en VI. Pour ce qui concerne cette dernière catégorie je pense comme toi au sujet du champ intitulé "Reason" et je me demandais, hier soir à ce sujet, si, pour un monument historique, il ne serait pas utile de faire figurer au moins le modèle fourni par Wikipédia et qui permet de justifier l'intérêt du bâtiment ou de l'objet (à défaut de celui de la photo !)... même si l'application de ce modèle ne donne des explications qu'en français. -- Erreur pour Cupea llavea : le lien rouge était pour l'édition française de Wikip., la plante a sa fiche dans d'autres langues. Je n'ai pas réussi, pour l'instant, à faire de bonnes photos de mon exemplaire... mais je n'ai pas dit mon dernier mot (Il n'est pas nécessaire d'espérer pour entreprendre, etc.) -- Dans le choc que vous évoquez ci-dessus avec Jebulon, celui-ci s'est très bien défendu. La qualité de ses photos devrait suffire à imposer le respect ou, au moins, les bonnes manières mais ce n'est pas toujours le cas. Il est vrai, comme l'écrivait un poète du XXe siècle, que "L'essentiel est toujours menacé par l'insignifiant". Amen. -- Très cordialement. -- JLPC (talk) 07:35, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Pour VI je suis toujours très attentif aux faits e gestes de Slaunger car c'est lui qui a créé le label VI. je vais essayé d'utiliser ce champs que j'ai un peu négligé.

Cupea llavea est un très bon sujet mais qui n'est pas facile. Déjà tu ne devrai pas bloquer la saturation sur ton appareil car tu "brûle " les rouges. Tu as de problèmes d'éclairages et tu as des problèmes de mise au point. Pour l'éclairage je t'en parles dès que j'ai un moment, et pour le reste il faut que tu apprennes le focus staking. Si çà te plais je te donnerai quelques conseils... A --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:27, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ponte de la Calcina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 10:09, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nessaea batesii, male, mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

All criteria met. -- JLPC (talk) 10:34, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Slaunger (talk) 20:26, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Campo San Maurizio (Venice).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment I think people cannot understand the scope because it is in Italian. Is it the square which is nominated or the church? After some days I realized that it is probably the square that's why no exterior in addition.--MrPanyGoff 06:03, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Your remark is well taken. The imprecision of the scope shows that it is not good. I propose to reduce the scope to "Campo San Maurizio".--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:57, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

 Support OK, the most informative (wider) view of this square.--MrPanyGoff 05:15, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Slaunger (talk) 20:38, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Melinaea mneme, male, mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

All criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 08:59, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Slaunger (talk) 20:39, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cecropis abyssinica (Lesser Striped Swallow), eggs.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful, all criteria met. Totodu74 (talk) 14:26, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Slaunger (talk) 20:44, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chiesa di San Bonaventura (Venice) Exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best out of two photos.--MrPanyGoff 05:52, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Slaunger (talk) 20:54, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cisticola erythrops (Red-faced Cisticola), eggs..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 SupportAll criteria met. -- JLPC (talk) 22:55, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Slaunger (talk) 20:56, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Danaus eresimus, male, mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met. -- JLPC (talk) 07:56, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 08:39, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oreortyx pictus (Mountain Quail), egg..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Paris 16 (talk) 20:23, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:11, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Re: débuts difficiles

Bonjour,

j'espère que j'utilise la bonne méthode pour te répondre. Merci pour les encouragements et les conseils. Je pense que je ne publie pas forcément les type de photos attendu. Pas grave, je m'adapterai : il en faut plus pour me décourager. :-) Cordialement, Cédric Amey (talk) 15:41, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Parait tu as déjà répondu au bon endroit :)--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:15, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria della Visitazione (Venice) (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support The shadows are a bit distracting, compared to File:Venezia - Chiesa di Santa Maria della Visitazione (degli Artigianelli).jpg, but that is easily overshadowed (forgive the pun) by the much higher technical quality (high resolution, better focus); overall this is best in scope. cmadler (talk) 19:20, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:49, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hirundo angolensis ( Angola Swallow), eggs..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support VI for me. -- Joydeep (talk) 19:57, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:50, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Besoin d'aide !

Bonjour mon ami,

Avant d'être excommunié (Un de mes bons amis, tu imagines lequel, a lancé une fatwa contre moi dans la page des Administrateurs, va voir, c'est rigolo), je me permets de te solliciter.

Les gens que je crois raisonnables ont besoin de ton aide à propos de cette image qui fait l'objet d'un âpre débat en CR des QIC. En gros, il y a ceux qui disent que "un gros insecte vrombissant sur une plante qui pourrait ressembler à une carotte ou du persil", ça suffit comme identification, et d'autres, dont je suis, avec Biopics, Slaunger, entre autres, qui souhaitent une identification, au sens scientifique du terme. les arguments des médiocres sont les mêmes que d'habitude. Je pense que tu te dois d'intervenir (pardon d'être aussi directif), parce que tu as les armes pour ça, et que sinon, on s'engage résolument dans la voie de la nullité et du n'importe quoi: ça fera jurisprudence !

Comptant sur toi,--Jebulon (talk) 15:27, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Va relire ce que j'ai écris car je ne suis pas sur de mon anglais. Tu peux me solliciter autant de fois que tu veux, comme tu le sais je jugerai toujours en conscience. Ce qui ternit les grandes aventures c'est la médiocrité. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:36, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Merci de ta réactivité ! Ton Anglais est largement suffisant et compréhensible, don't worry ! J'ai également sollicité l'avis de Llez, qui sera précieux sur ce cas très litigieux.--Jebulon (talk) 17:44, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Bonjour mon ami.

Sur ma page d'utilisateur, remonte un peu jusqu'à la rubrique "FYE", tu y trouveras un étron aimablement déposé par le procédurier, qui te conduira directement à cette page des sycophantes en folie.

Un point de procédure: l'homme m'a d'abord "dénoncé" et m'en a informé, ce qui a donné lieu à un vif échange, puis, alors que le débat était éteint depuis trois jours, il a relancé dans la même rubrique, cette fois-ci en demandant mon bannissement. Sauf que là, je ne suis pas officiellement au courant, tu remarqueras que je me suis bien gardé d'intervenir, c'est exprès. Dans la foulée, quelques lignes plus tard, il a aussi dénoncé Biopics, et mène ainsi de front deux guérillas dans lesquelles il se ridiculise à chaque intervention, et qui vont mourir de leur belle mort. Je regrette qu'il n'y ait pas d'effet boomerang possible dans "Commons", et qu'une dénonciation n'ayant pas abouti à une sanction n'entraîne pas automatiquement une sanction équivalente pour son auteur (ça s'appelle la "dénonciation calomnieuse", en droit français) !!

Par ailleurs, tu verras aussi sur ma page que j'ai reçu à cet égard un sympathique clin d'oeil de Biopics, auquel bien sûr je me suis empressé de répondre (par mail). Nous l'aurait-on changé ? Comme quoi, il faut garder foi en l'Homme en toutes circonstances, je crois que c'est aussi ta philosophie, et tu as bien raison !!

Enfin, et c'est bien plus importants que toutes mes petites avanies (mais auxquelles je ne suis quand même pas tout à fait indifférent...), je suis ravi des excellents contacts et de la magnifique entrée, très spectaculaire, de notre nouvel ami charentais JLPC, c'est un vrai plaisir d'échanger avec lui, il a tout compris et on se régale de sa participation ! --Jebulon (talk) 08:32, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

J'ai lu par le menu cette affaire.

Il n’y parait pas mais tu es un affectif. Tu prends çà trop à cœur. Tu perds du temps, mais surtout tu souffres pour des gens qui n’en valent pas la peine. Moi qui ai une certaine expérience de la folie (572 enfants autistes) je sais qu’il ne faut pas rentrer dans leur jeu. Tu deviendras plus facilement fou que tu n’en feras des sages. Laisse-le pour ce qu’il est et, si tu dois lui parler, n’argumente pas, tu lui donnes l’occasion de son excitation.

Regard plutôt le retour des uns et l’arrivée charentaise des autres qui sont autant de signes d’espoir. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:28, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Comment ça, "il n'y parait pas" ? Bien sûr que je suis un affectif ! --Jebulon (talk) 19:41, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mechanitis polymnia (Orange-spotted Tiger Clearwing) male, mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 13:58, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:45, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cecropis semirufa (Rufous-chested Swallow) egg..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 14:00, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:46, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Francesco di Paola (Venice), exterior..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in the scope.--MrPanyGoff 20:15, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 11:02, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Petrochelidon spilodera ( South African Cliff Swallow), eggs..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 09:27, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 11:03, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Scope change in Commons:Valued image candidates/Philaeus chrysops podgorje 01.jpg

I have changed the scope, which may null and void your votes. If possible, you may vote support again. --George Ho (talk) 15:15, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Thecla hemon.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Thecla hemon, both side and both sex. Mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Pretty good. -- JLPC (talk) 09:14, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>

promoted. -- MrPanyGoff 09:25, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Scope change

Commons:Valued image candidates/Shiprock.snodgrass3.jpg has had a scope change since your last comment. Hohum (talk) 18:53, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tigridia acesta male, mounted specimen..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met. -- JLPC (talk) 20:01, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:38, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Nicolò dei Mendicoli (Venice) exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 09:24, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 08:47, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ciconia abdimii ( Abdim's Stork) egg..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support. All criteria met. -- JLPC (talk) 09:28, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 08:48, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Valued image candidates/Shiprock.snodgrass3.jpg

Now it is geocoded, so I wonder if you can still vote. --George Ho (talk) 05:57, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lophura edwardsi (Edwards's Pheasant) egg..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support. All criteria met. -- JLPC (talk) 18:56, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 08:20, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Lophius piscatorius MHNT.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lophius piscatorius MHNT.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Merci pour cette Baudroie. L'image a une genèse mouvementée, mais le résultat est sympathique au vue des conditions très particulière de la prise de vue. Si on démonte la vitrine je referai ce shoot, dans quelques années... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:52, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Il fallait bien que ce "cadeau" soit remercié ! D'ailleurs, je pense qu'il est temps de te donner ta Photographers Blackbelt ! --Citron (talk) 16:41, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

		THE PHOTOGRAPHER'S BLACKBELT
		I hereby award at you this Photographers Blackbelt for your outstanding and excellent pictures of the nature. Continue à nous faire découvrir les merveilles qui nous entourent ! Amicalement --Citron (talk) 11:58, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Papilio thoas (King Swallowtail), male , mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support All criteria met --Llez (talk) 04:53, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:10, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ptyonoprogne obsoleta (Pale Crag Martin) eggs.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support. All criteria met. -- JLPC (talk) 11:51, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:11, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Riparia riparia (Sand Martin) eggs.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support VI IMO. -- JLPC (talk) 11:53, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:12, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Demoiselle azure

Coucou Archeodontosaurus, j'ai rajouté cette demoiselle au projet Phoebus, cela dit je ne suis pas certain que cela soit approprié. Bref n'hésite pas à me gronder. :-) --PierreSelim (talk) 12:06, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

• ARRRRR s'est splendide! Met la en QI et en VI, en FP aussi. Tu devrais aller à la Marouine tu es très doué pour les rugbymans et les insectes "in vivo". Ça rentre parfaitement dans Phoebus (pas les rugbymans). --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:06, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Arg peut-être une mauvaise identification User_talk:Quartl#Identification_of_File:Coenagrion_puella_-_MHNT_-_2012-06-14.jpg_in_QIC, mais je t'avoue que je ne vois pas la différence entre les deux espèces :-) --PierreSelim (talk) 15:07, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

J'ai répondu directement dans QI. Tu ne t'es pas trompé. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:47, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria Maggiore (Venice) exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support. Best in scope. -- JLPC (talk) 07:23, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 10:43, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Menophra abruptaria (Waved Umber ), mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support. All criteria met. -- JLPC (talk) 07:24, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 10:44, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cisticola anonymus (Chattering Cisticola), eggs..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Of course. Totodu74 (talk) 18:09, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 11:28, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Le retour du triodon bourse

J'étais pas très content du rarissime triodon bourse, le voilà de retour en plus coloré File:Triodon macropterus - MHNT ICHT.1995.332.jpg, qu'en penses tu ? --PierreSelim (talk) 18:52, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

D'une façon générale je penses que tu ne te lâches pas assez sur le post-traitement, et pour faire pendant, personnellement j'en fais trop. On est là aussi pour "essayer". Ceci dis ta dernière version du Triodon est bien meilleure.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:49, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Photo académique

Petite pensée pour toi et Pierre-Selim, depuis Paris. Amitiés, et bravo pour vos travaux.--Jebulon (talk) 00:11, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Merci. Pour cette pensée... Vivement les vacances que l'on puisse faire des photos. Voir même la retraite pour qu'on s'en occupe sérieusement... :)--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:01, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Penetes pamphanis, mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Criteria met. Totodu74 (talk) 12:38, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 05:09, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palazzo Malipiero Trevisan (Venice), exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Paris 16 (talk) 12:20, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 05:10, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Schistocerca pallens, male, mounted specimen.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Schistocerca pallens, male, mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--MrPanyGoff 20:37, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Giorgio degli Schiavoni (Venice) Exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 SupportBest in scope IMO. -- JLPC (talk) 12:10, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 19:55, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Phalera bucephala ( Buff-tip), mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support. All criteria met. -- JLPC (talk) 12:11, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 19:56, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chiesa della Pietà (Venice) exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Meets all criteria; best in scope for me. cmadler (talk) 18:17, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:17, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Phoebis philea, male, mouned specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met. -- JLPC (talk) 21:28, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:18, 30 June 2012 (UTC)