Anton-kurt

Der gehört Dir ...

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brücke Fladnitzbach Kirchengasse 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 06:34, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

. --M@nfred (talk) 07:08, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

... und da ist der nächste

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vulkan Amikejo EFWachau 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Musicaline 04:25, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

. --M@nfred (talk) 05:40, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Aller guten Dinge sind drei

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aussichtswarte Engabrunn 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:33, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

. --M@nfred (talk) 05:45, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Und hier ist noch eine Draufgabe

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pieta Bildstock 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:46, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

. --M@nfred (talk) 06:11, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Eine zweite Draufgabe

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dickes Kreuz Neustift im Felde 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:20, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

.Gratuliere!--M@nfred (talk) 06:29, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Eine dritte Draufgabe

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AlteKroneVandans2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:43, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

. --M@nfred (talk) 05:27, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Die letzte Draufgabe

Mit dieser letzten Draufgabe habe ich sicher unter Beweis gestellt, daß Du nicht bloß ein „Knipser“ bist. Mit ein wenig Aufwand (Stativ und Nachbearbeitungssoftware) gelingen Dir sicherlich viele derartige Qualitätsfotos. Und wenn Du diese QI's haben möchtest, dann mußt Du Deine guten Fotos einfach dafür nominieren. Viel Erfolg und lG--M@nfred (talk) 05:35, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WrNeustadtAkademieparkBildstock.A.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vengolis 04:09, 6 July 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Vengolis 04:13, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Josef Schagerl

Hallo Anton-kurt, die Schagerls sind zwei, senior und junior. Das Bild Josef Schagerl sen.jpg muss in eine neue Kategorie. Machst Du das? Nebenbei, es ist eine URV, Bildrechte liegen bei Elisabeth Schagerl, für das Repro noch einem anderen, siehe Angabe in der Topographie Scheibbs. --Emeritus (talk) 20:38, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Heiligenfiguren in Salzburg

Hallo Anton-kurt, kennst du dich bei Heiligenfiguren aus? In dieser Kategorie sollen lt. Bildbeschreibungen die Bilder mit den Nr. 22 und 34 beide die heilige Walpurga darstellen. Ist das möglich, dass in einer Kirche zwei unterschiedliche Abbildungen einer Person vorhanden sind? Bitte ggf. um Nachbearbeitung. lg --Eweht (talk) 08:17, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Walburga zeigt die Attribute Bischofsstab einer Äbtissin und in der anderen Hand ein Buch und auf dem Buch ein Krug mit Henkel. Nr. 34 also passend und mit Walpurgi beschriftet. Nr. 22 nur mit Buch eher nicht Walpurga, und Dopplung auch eher nicht, also zwei mal mit Nein. --Anton-kurt (talk) 17:42, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Deletion

Hello!

When deleting redirects, please use {{SD|G2}} instead of {{Bad name}}.Jonteemil (talk) 15:36, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Das Gelbe vom Ei?

Hallo Kurt, ist es wirklich das Gelbe vom Ei, wenn du diesen hässlichen, verzerrten Bauklotz als Bild für die Navibox hernimmst und dafür das Übersichtsbild vom Ort, inklusive dem "identitätsstiftenden" Erzberg im Hintergrund, entfernst? -- Bwag (talk) 09:54, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

PS: Oder wolltest du mit diesem Bild nur die trübe Stimmung, die im Ort vorherrscht (wirtschaftlich geht es immer mehr abwärts und daher verlassen immer mehr (junge) Bewohner den Ort), ausdrücken? -- Bwag (talk) 09:58, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Lieber Freund, du hast recht, aber das entfernte Bild ist weiter verlinkt unter Geografie, also ganz weg nicht. Kultürlich sollte sich irgendwann ein besseres Foto zum Rathaus finden lassen. Einen schönen Tag dir und bis später mal dann auf einen gemeinsamen Hock. --Anton-kurt (talk) 10:52, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:PropsteiSanktGerold.Tt.JPG

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 12:31, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Alte Masken g´hörn ´kübelt 01.jpg

File:Alte Masken g´hörn ´kübelt 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tokfo (talk) 10:16, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Tyrol new files

Ist es vielleicht möglich, daß meine Fotos aus BAYERN nicht ständig in "Tyrol new files" einsortiert werden??? Das zum Beispiel:

.

Das ist von Tirol so weit weg wie München von Wien. mfg --Luitold (talk) 07:19, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Wenn sie in Kategorien einsortiert sind, die irgendwo unter Category:Tyrol (state) liegen, landen sie ganz automatisch dort; das macht ein Bot, nicht der Benutzer, den du hier anschreibst. In dem Fall deshalb:

• File:REI Müllnerhorn 08.jpg => Category:Müllnerberg => Category:Mountains of the Chiemgau Alps in Bavaria => Category:Mountains of the Chiemgau Alps => Category:Chiemgau Alps => Category:Mountain ranges of Tyrol (state) => Category:Mountains of Tyrol (state) => Category:Landforms of Tyrol (state) => Category:Geography of Tyrol (state) => Category:Tyrol (state)

Natürlich könnte man bestimmte Unterkategorien auch ausschließen; ich erkläre hier nur, warum das passiert. Tokfo (talk) 07:33, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Wenn jemand den Bot fein verbessern kann, dann freut mich das sehr. Ich kann es nicht. --Anton-kurt (talk) 08:00, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Mein von Dir (oder dem "Bot") ungefähr am 14.9.2020 hochgeladenes Bild von der Arlbergbahn und dem Radonatobelviadukt gehört zu Vorarlberg, nicht zu Tirol.--32-Fuß-Freak (talk) 15:30, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Doch, kannst du, indem du auf User talk:OgreBot/gallery um eine Bearbeitung der Konfiguration ersuchst. Dokumentiert sind alle Details auf User:OgreBot/gallery. Aber es wird immer so sein, dass auch einige nicht relevante Fotos dort reinkommen, weil der Kategorienbaum eben so funktioniert. Tokfo (talk) 08:02, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Umbenennung von Denkmalkategorien

User:Bwag hat mir gesagt, ich sollte dir sagen. Was ich hiermit tue. Er hätte auch selber können, sagen und / oder korrigieren, aber das wäre wohl zuviel de:WP:AGF: Umbenennungen wie [1] bringen aus einer Gesamtsicht keine Verbesserung. Kategorieumbenennungen brauchen neben einer ev. Änderung im WP-Artikel und in der Denkmalliste auch ein Nachziehen von Commons category (P373) an etwa Hirschstetten Parish Church (Q1371313). lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 20:16, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Zum „User:Bwag hat mir gesagt, ich sollte dir sagen.“ Hallo Kurt, lass dich nicht anschwanern. Im Übrigen sehe ich es positiv, wenn die Pfarrkirchen eine Bezeichnung nach einheitlichem Schema bekommen. -- Gruß Bwag (talk) 21:09, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Liebe WP-Workers! Dachte, die Pfarrkirche ist ein ehemaliger Anfang meinerseits. Ich war auch letzte Woche dort, wollte bevor ich dazukomme um von mir gemachte weitere Fotos hochzuladen die Sache vereinfachen. Als Teil des Ganzen bin ich ja auch immer wieder Opfer ?! von Verschiebungen die mir nicht gefallen. Ich wünsche einen schönen Sonntag. --Anton-kurt (talk) 09:33, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Frage

Wird das dein neues Betätigungsfeld, sprich: Ein-Bild-Kategorien anzulegen? Gruß - Bwag (talk) 22:32, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Lieber Freund! Net woar. Aber: Ein Commonscat sollte die Liste haben. Oder? --Anton-kurt (talk) 22:34, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Aha, wer hat das festgelegt? Gruß - Bwag (talk) 22:43, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

PS: Und wenn schon, dann bitte vollumfänglich: [2], [3]

Die Gemeinde Lohnsburg nennt das Heimathaus mit <Heimathaus Lohnsburg>, also wäre das Commonscat damit richtiger. Oder? --Anton-kurt (talk) 20:08, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Bundwerkstadel

Nein, ein Gesamtfoto vom Bundwerkstadel habe ich nicht. Liebe Grüße--Werner100359 (talk) 02:07, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Danke für die Antwort. Liebe Grüße --Anton-kurt (talk) 14:43, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

WikiDaheim

Hallo Anton-kurt, deine Fotos File:Hofkapelle Mitterreit 01.jpg und File:Hofkapelle Mitterreit 05.jpg erfüllen nicht die Teilnahmebedingungen für WikiDaheim (Mindestgröße 2 MPixel). Magst du bitte die Fotos aus dem Bewerb nehmen (durch Entfernen der entsprechenden Bausteine und Kategorien) oder eine größere Version drüberladen? lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 05:08, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Fotos aus dem Bewerb von WikiDaheim genommen. Danke. --Anton-kurt (talk) 14:07, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

File:Filialkirche Grimmenstein 07.jpg

Hallo Anton-kurt, ist das eine Innenaufnahme oder eine Nische an der Außenwand? Konkret, wo hast du bei der Aufnahme gestanden? Ich frage, weil davon abhängt, ob FoP-Austria geltend gemacht werden kann, weil der Künstler noch nicht >70 Jahre tot ist. --Túrelio (talk) 10:00, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Lieber Turelio, mächtiges Holzrelief an der Altarwand im Kircheninneren, es zeigt das Patrozinium Josef der Arbeiter als Bildnis! Liebe Grüße Anton-kurt (talk) 10:09, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Danke für die schnelle AW. Sorry dafür dass es jetzt vielleicht doch etwas schmerzen wird (mich auch). Ich sehe 3 Möglichkeiten: a) du versuchst von den Nachfahren des 1985 verstorbenen Bildhauers eine Genehmigung zu bekommen; b) ich eröffne eine LD, in der kleinen Hoffnung, dass das Relief doch irgendwie als Gebäudebestandteil (gemäß FoP-Austria) durchgeht ; c) auf die "Undelete in 2056"-Liste setzen und schnelllöschen. --Túrelio (talk) 10:18, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

An und für sich haben wir in Österreich keine so strenge Regelung. Aber da die Qualität des Bildes schlecht ist, mehr als Beleg für den Text stand, gerne schnelllöschen. Ich sehe das Ganze unbeschwert. Keine Ursache für Streit. Danke. Anton-kurt (talk) 10:32, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Deshalb hatte ich ja auch Weg b) offeriert. Da könnte das Ganze in Ruhe von Experten der österr. FoP-Rechtsprechung/Auslegung diskutiert werden. --Túrelio (talk) 10:49, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Da hat keine/keiner die Zeit für. Darf ich als Fotograf einfach {{SD|G2}} schnelllöschen hinein setzen? Anton-kurt (talk) 11:06, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Klar. Warte noch 1 Moment bis ich es auf der Undelete-Liste habe. OK, erl. --Túrelio (talk) 12:03, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Fotos im RegiowikiAT

Hallo Anton-Kurt, kannst du bitte auch meine Bitte bei Commons talk:Tracking external file usage unterstützen. Sind ja doch auch Fotos von dir im RAT ;-) --danke und lg -- K@rl (talk) Diskussion 08:34, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Category:Nursing_homes

Nursing homes has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Herzi Pinki (talk) 13:22, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Synagoge in WN

Vielen Dank, siehe regiowiki:Jüdische Synagoge Wiener Neustadt :-) --lg -- K@rl (talk) Diskussion 09:10, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, das ist der Neubau, nach der Demolierung des Prokschhauses. Ich müßte suchen, ob ich in meiner Ablage ein Foto vom ehemaligen Prokschhaus habe. Dauert aber. --Anton-kurt (talk) 09:15, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Das heißt das Prokschhaus gibt es auch nihct mehr, danke, denn dann stimmt der Text auch nicht mehr. ---- K@rl (talk) Diskussion 09:37, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Hans Peschetz.jpeg

File:Hans Peschetz.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Quedel (talk) 20:07, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Janko Šlebinger Gornja Radgona 01.jpg

And also:

• File:Janko Šlebinger Gornja Radgona 02.jpg
• File:Janko Šlebinger Gornja Radgona 03.jpg

Yours sincerely, TadejM ^(t/p) 15:02, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Anton Krempl Gornja Radgona 01.jpg

And also:

• File:Anton Krempl Gornja Radgona 02.jpg
• File:Anton Krempl Gornja Radgona 03.jpg

Yours sincerely, TadejM ^(t/p) 15:09, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Anton Trstenjak Gornja Radgona 01.jpg

And also:

• File:Anton Trstenjak Gornja Radgona 02.jpg
• File:Anton Trstenjak Gornja Radgona 03.jpg

Yours sincerely, TadejM ^(t/p) 15:09, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Franc Simonič (bibliograf) Gornja Radgona 01.jpg

And also:

• File:Franc Simonič (bibliograf) Gornja Radgona 02.jpg
• File:Franc Simonič (bibliograf) Gornja Radgona 03.jpg
• File:Franc Simonič (bibliograf) Gornja Radgona 04.jpg

Yours sincerely, TadejM ^(t/p) 15:10, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:France Veber Gornja Radgona 01.jpg

And also:

• File:France Veber Gornja Radgona 02.jpg
• File:France Veber Gornja Radgona 03.jpg
• File:France Veber Gornja Radgona 04.jpg

Yours sincerely, TadejM ^(t/p) 15:10, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Johannes Aquila Gornja Radgona 01.jpg

And also:

• File:Johannes Aquila Gornja Radgona 02.jpg
• File:Johannes Aquila Gornja Radgona 03.jpg
• File:Johannes Aquila Gornja Radgona 05.jpg

Yours sincerely, TadejM ^(t/p) 15:14, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Jožef Veršič Gornja Radgona 01.jpg

And also:

• File:Jožef Veršič Gornja Radgona 02.jpg
• File:Jožef Veršič Gornja Radgona 03.jpg

Yours sincerely, TadejM ^(t/p) 15:16, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Manko Golar Gornja Radgona 01.jpg

And also:

• File:Manko Golar Gornja Radgona 02.jpg

Yours sincerely, TadejM ^(t/p) 15:18, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Peter Dajnko Gornja Radgona 01.jpg

And also:

• File:Peter Dajnko Gornja Radgona 02.jpg

Yours sincerely, TadejM ^(t/p) 15:19, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Category:Josef Kraft

Category:Josef Kraft is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

CSD C2 (unuseful empty category)

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

---

Prototyperspective (talk) 15:02, 6 September 2024 (UTC)