Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Anthospace!

Image:Galibier22.jpg

edit

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  /−


Hello Anthospace!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. Multichill (talk) 22:35, 12 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Tip: Categorizing images

edit

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  /−


Hello, Anthospace!
 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 05:37, 24 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Buron de la Richarde

edit

Peux-tu me dire dans quelle commune a été prise cette photo? Je cherche une photo de buron d'Aubrac pour illustrer l'article sur le fromage de laguiole. Merci de ton aide. Cdlt, --PANDA 81 (talk) 11:56, 11 February 2010 (UTC)Reply


Désolé PANDA 81, mais je pense que tu ne trouveras pas ton bonheur avec cette photo. Et pour cause, j'ai pris la photo dans les Hautes-Chaumes du Forez à 1 km du sommet de Pierre-sur-Haute (1634m). Je pense que cela doit être sur le territoire de la commune de Saint-Pierre de Bourlhonne (63), soit loin de l'Aubrac. D'ailleurs, bien que j'ai beaucoup parcouru le Massif Central, je n'ai jamais été en Aubrac ni à Laguiole. Je n'ai fait que traverser l'Aubrac par l'autoroute A75.

Cordialement.

 

--Anthospace (talk) 15:33, 13 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Grand Colombier

edit

Salut, j'ai renommé la page, j'espère que c'est le titre que tu voulais, en tout cas n'hésites pas. Grand Colombier . Otourly (talk) 18:42, 21 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Merci bien, c'est tout à fait ce que je voulais et je vais rajouter d'autres photos sur cette page. Cela dit en créant cette page, je pensais ajouter une catégorie mais les liens internes restent rouges. --Anthospace (talk) 09:09, 22 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

tu voudrais placer ces images dans la catégorie Category:Grand Colombier ? Otourly (talk) 15:42, 22 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Oui, en effet, j'aimerais créer une catégorie à ce nom. --Anthospace (talk) 04:34, 24 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:AubergeG.jpg

edit

Hi, can you tell me a bit more about where this photograph is taken.

 

Thanks :-). --Tony Wills (talk) 23:15, 22 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

This photo was taken in a kilometer of the summit of the pass of Galibier (2642m) on its north hillside ( side climbed since Valloire in Savoy), next to the tunnel of Galibier.

Cordially --Anthospace (talk) 23:03, 24 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Any idea where?

edit
 

Hi, can you remember around where this picture was taken. It would be helpful (for the categorization) if you know in which region or département of France. Midi-Pyrénées, Pyrénées-Atlantiques, Pyrénées-Orientales? Kind Regards, --Stanzilla (talk) 16:19, 12 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello. I took this picture on the summit of the "Plateau de Beille" in the department of Ariège (09) on the month of august in 2008. Cordially. --Anthospace (talk) 13:25, 13 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thank you very much. :)--Stanzilla (talk) 14:41, 13 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Antennes militaires de Pierre-sur-Haute.JPG

edit
 
File:Antennes militaires de Pierre-sur-Haute.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:10, 6 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Robert Marchand0001b.jpg

edit
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Robert Marchand0001b.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Robert Marchand0001b.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

JuTa 11:43, 18 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Stéle Simpson Ventoux 84.JPG

edit
 
File:Stéle Simpson Ventoux 84.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

GermanJoe (talk) 00:33, 8 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Que mon image soit supprimée parce qu'il y en a trop est logique et acceptable. En revanche, qu'elle le soit pour des questions de liberté de panorama l'est beaucoup moins. C'est ridicule: on ne voit le visage de personne et ce n'est pas non plus un site militaire qui est photographié. Bref, je ne vois pas en quoi cette photo est génante et contreviendrait à des principes. Si c'est le cas, autant supprimer les photos de tous les musées ou oeuvres d'art en France sur wikipédia, tant qu'on y est !

Cordialement. --Anthospace (talk) 06:24, 9 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Category:Mont_Vinaigre

edit
 

Mont Vinaigre has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


93.0.201.77 16:06, 11 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 10:13, 26 March 2020 (UTC)Reply