Alfvanbeem

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Alfvanbeem!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Vehicle price

Author category

Hi Alfvanbeem,

If you are interested, I could create a category Category:Photographs by Alfvanbeem or Category:Photographs by Alf van Beem and have my bot add your uploads in there. It would take the bot some time to add them, but it wouldn't involve too much work. It could make it easier to navigate through your photographs, similar to Category:Images by S.J. de Waard.

BTW thanks for sharing your photographs with us. It's a substantial part of our Commons ships collection. --  Docu  at 14:17, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Reply: Hi Docu, I hope i am responding in the right way. Please do as you suggested. Thanks and regards, Alf

Thanks for your response. Do you prefer "Photographs by Alfvanbeem" or "Photographs by Alf van Beem" (or some other variant)? Subcategories at Category:User categories (flat list) use quite a few different variations. --  Docu  at 20:09, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Reply: Hi Docu, "Photographs by Alf van Beem" would be nice i think. Thanks, Alf

Ok. I did some of it today. I will try to finish tomorrow. --  Docu  at 19:13, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

I guess this was just a mistake. But you better check so you haven't "taken credit" from someone else on other images :-) Cheers! /V-wolf (talk) 20:48, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi, Alfvanbeem

Similarly, I asked for a series of images to be corrected (see Commons:Bots/Work_requests#Fix_author_name). I assume this is correct. --  Docu  at 02:19, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Hi Alf van Beem,

I was about to move about 400 ships from "Photographs by Alf van Beem" to "Ships photographed by Alf van Beem", but after about 100 I stopped as I noticed that you had moved some in the opposite direction. If it's a problem, I can undo the 100.

With my Best Wishes for 2013. --  Docu  at 17:07, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	For the large amount of high quality images of all kinds of vehicles. Thank you! High Contrast (talk) 17:18, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Binnenschepen

Vraagje. Tot op heden zie ik dat je meestal foto's van zeeschepen uploadt, maar mijn vraag is om bij het rondvaren door de haven ook eens wat meer aandacht te besteden aan de binnenvaart. Maar dan wel gelijk het verzoek om bij die schepen ook een foto te maken waarbij je duidelijk het Europanummer (ENI-nummer) kunt aflezen. Ik zoek me vaak mottig om dat achteraf bij binnenschepen weer terug te vinden. En als de naam er dan niet bijstaat is dat geen probleem, via dat nummer is die meestal wel te vinden op de site van De binnenvaart. Zo doe ik dat meestal, zie: Category:Companion (ship, 2009). (Vanaf de brug van Gorinchem genomen.) Ik zag overigens net dat je er al een zwik gedaan had. Prima. --Stunteltje (talk) 09:11, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you !

40,000 contributions but I can't even count, let alone look at, all your brilliant images. Penyulap ☏ 12:17, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Images of cans

Hello, Alfvanbeem. Could you consider giving a license to the cans of the images you're uploading? I am not familiar with the subject, and I can't read Dutch so I cannot research it either. You can do it via the {{3-D in PD|<Template or reason here>}} template. Thanks. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:41, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi Magog, I do not understand the question. As i look back to these uploads i see i have given them a licence. Did you mean i should categorize them? Regards, Alf Alfvanbeem (talk) 16:19, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

You haven't provided a license to the cans. Your photographs qualify as derivative works; if the cans themselves are not out of copyright, then we must delete the photographs. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:25, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi Magog, If i follow the tree on https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Derivative_Works_Decision_Tree.svg, it is permanently installed in a public place (the museum Terug in de Tijd) and free of FOP. Than it should be ok or not? Regards, Alf

Panoramafreiheit refers to photographs of permanently fixed items, namely statues and buildings. Museums are not considered OK in most countries, including the Netherlands. So I don't believe so. However, if the cans are old enough, they may be in the public domain already. Also, we only have to worry about the part of the cans that has artwork on it. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:09, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

OK, thanks for the info. The only thing i know about the museum is that the stuff they have expositioned is from 1900 - 1960's. So if you think some of them should be deleted, please go ahead. Regards, Alfvanbeem (talk) 17:16, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

File:ATST cigarettes.JPG

Presumably Devanagari, not "ATST"... AnonMoos (talk) 22:11, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Gratitude for cigarette pack images

Dear Alf, though I'm not a smoker, I've recently started appreciating the design of cigarette packaging. Thanks so much for your uploads of images of these, and for releasing them into the public domain. Sincerely, Leon... (talk) 15:07, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	For your wonderful, hi-res photos of cigarette packaging. Leon... (talk) 15:26, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Problem with your pictures of 2 Chevrolet Task Force pick-up

Hello!

I faced difficulties with categorizing 2 pickups (4 pictures) you put on Commons:

• File:Chevrolet 3100 Pick-Up (1959), Dutch licecence registration BE-29-06 pic2.JPG
  
• File:Chevrolet Apache dutch licence registration BE-33-03 pic3.JPG and its siblings (File:Chevrolet Apache dutch licence registration BE-33-03 pic1.JPG and File:Chevrolet Apache dutch licence registration BE-33-03 pic2.JPG)

You gave the first one the name "Chevrolet 3100 Pick-Up (1959)". Are you 100% sure of this model year? It has indeed the 1958-59 only rear "Fleetside" bed, but also... 1955-57 fenders, a 1955-56 only hood and a 1957 only fender emblem
If this one is definitely a 1959 model, it will go with the other 1958-59 Apache Task Force trucks. But shouldn't it then be given a better name, so people can understand it has some older parts on it? And if you're unsure, I think it would be better also to change the name to avoid showing a misleading model year.

Same problem with the blue pick-up: 1958-59 bed and 1959 only fender emblem, but 1955-57 fenders and 1955-56 only hood and front fascia. If it is a pre-1958 model with later bed and emblem, it cannot be named Apache and categorized with such trucks. But the name of the picture has then to be changed, so people won't be confused.
If it is 1958 model with previous model cab, it's without a doubt an Apache, but the name deserve to be also changed, so one can understand why a pick-up with that kind of front fascia is among totally different looking trucks.

What do you think about all of this?

For the record, the 3 different front fascias of the Task Force series, and the one of "your" blue TF.

1955-56	1957	1958-59	"Yours" #2

Regards,
BarnCas (talk) 08:31, 25 August 2014 (UTC) Cars

Hi BarnCas, I do not have much knowledge of cars, i looked up the data on the website of the Dutch car registration of the tax office. There it simply says what year the car was officially registered. So i leave it up to you to do what you think is best :)

Regards Alfvanbeem (talk) 10:26, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Sorry to jump in with a "side-question", but your talk page is on my watch list and .... would you mind letting us know the web page ("url"?) for the Dutch tax office? And please.

In case helpful, here is the one for the British tax office (which was discovered - or at least notified to me by a fellow contributor from not Britain but Finland). http://www.taxdisc.direct.gov.uk

Many thanks if you can help on this. Success Charles01 (talk) 11:55, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

It is http://www.rdw.nl

You can enter the licencenumber (with or without dashes) in the yellow area.

Alfvanbeem (talk) 14:17, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Seriously useful and thank you much.

Do you happen to know why such a high proportion of the cars appear to have been first registered in the month of June? - especially US originating cars. Do NOT, please, take time thinking about this. I just thought you MIGHT have noticed the same issue yourself and found an explanation. Regards Charles01 (talk) 15:18, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

@ Alfvanbeem

I do not have much knowledge of cars [...] So i leave it up to you to do what you think is best :)

— Alfvanbeem

I feared such an answer
Ok, I'll do something. I don't know what yet, but I'll do it. Most certainly ask to remove model year (59) and model name (Apache) from the names of the pictures, and explain the "chimera mix" of these cars in the description...
I think indeed it is important not to mislead people seeking for informations on how a car/truck/flower/whatever-you-want looks like.

@Charles01:

• American model year change in July, like in many other countries. So maybe the car dealers give a substantial discount to get rid of as many "soon to be last model year" cars as possible in June? I also vaguely remember a tax story related to former model year, but I don't remember if it was for the USA nor if it is a recent practice or a 50 years old one...
• Not asked, but you'll find a lot of links about registration plate numbers in numerous countries here. And also this tool (fr) for the new French plates. Finding the date of first registration is not the actual purpose of the French tool, but it does it in practice
    But remember that in France:
  • the new plate system will give useful informations only for mid-2009 vehicles, as the former system gave plate numbers depending on the location of the owner of the car. For 2009 on, a new vehicle gets a unique national and life-long plate number.
  • pre-2009 vehicles can get (and they will eventually all have) a new system plate number. It then just gives the date of their first registration... in the new system, regardless of their actual model year...

Regards,
BarnCas (talk) 03:34, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Thank you both. I've not yet gone through the answers but it looks as though I'll have fun following up on those links. It is indeed a source of sadness for me that with Italian and (more recently) French cars you cannot simply look at the license plate and know where in the country it is registered. (Though maybe it's not important enough to trigger anything so profound as sadness...)

In terms of getting to the age of the car from the license plate, the Netherlands and Great Britain are both unusual - at least at this end of Europe - in that the same license plate (usually) stays with the car throughout the life of the car. So you really can know - or at least the information is there if you can access it - simply from looking at the license plate when the car was first registered. Ho hum and best wishes. Charles01 (talk) 06:59, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

@Charles01: I think the plate subject deserves to have its own existence in your UTP

@Alfvanbeem: Once again, thank you for your response

BarnCas (talk) 00:30, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Van Nelle De Echte Zware karonnen reklame bord pic2.JPG

Hallo, Alf. Hast du damals wirklich das Plakat entworfen, oder hast du nur das Bild eingescannt oder kopiert? Wir brauchen ja immer die Genehmigung des Original-Künstlers für solche Uploads. De728631 (talk) 19:31, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Yes, if any of those tins and cardboards was published before 1923, please consider using {{Licensed-PD |1={{PD-1923}}{{PD-EU-anonymous}} |2= <your CC license>}}. That should be more informative and may prevent unnecessary deletion discussions. De728631 (talk) 19:03, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Speelgoedmuseum Deventer

Beste Alfvanbeem, heb je toevallig ook een foto van de buitenkant van het museum? Ik zag wel hele fraaie foto's van de collectie namelijk. Vriendelijke groet, Graaf Statler (talk) 23:30, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Brug 408

Hoi, op 8 mei heb je een foto geupload van een deel van brug 408 in Amsterdam (C. Schuystraat/Breitnerstraat). Heb je soms nog ergens een foto van de hele brug?Ceescamel (talk) 14:22, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Hoi Cees, nog niet! Zal ik zo snel mogelijk doen!

Groetjes, Alf

Hoi Cees, ik was er vorige week om foto's te maken, maar de hele brug lag open door wegwerkzaamheden dus het zal nog even duren.

Groetjes, Alf

category:Sunbeam 3 litre super sports tc‎

Hi Alf, thank you for all the photos of the old Sunbeam 3-litre which must have been quite a special car. I have a complaint. There is not One photograph of the back of the car. A stern photo is always a great help in identifying cars, too often they have passed me and that's all I have to go on. In this case it suddenly matters because there is disagreement between two "authorities" about the car's rear suspension. There is so little bodywork I imagine a rear view would most probably settle the dispute. (Maybe some were built with one style of rear springs and then some were made with a different style.) But it would have been nice to have been able to show one of your excellent pictures to prove right / wrong.

Thank you for all the excellent images you put into Wikimedia. Please do not stop. Thanks and regards, Eddaido (talk) 12:32, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Wagenaarbrug pic2 en pic3.jpg

Ik mis "Wagenaarbrug pic1.jpg", daar staat toch niet toevallig de hele brug op:-). Zou je als je zin hebt ook deze willen laden?Ceescamel (talk) 10:44, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Mocht je weer eens in De Pijp zijn; ik zoek een plaatje van het Afrikahuis in de Van Ostadestraat. maar zoek dan wel mooi weer op, want bij regen is dat gebouw verschrikkelijk troosteloos.Ceescamel (talk) 15:07, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Hoi Ceescamel, ik heb gezocht en hem niet kunnen vinden. Moet iets fout gegaan zijn bij het uploaden! Ik ga zsm nieuwe foto's maken! Groetjes Alfvanbeem (talk) 15:16, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Als je dat foeilelijke gebouw gaat fotograferen, dan graag ook foto's van de bruggen in het Sarphatipark. Volgens mij zijn het er twee of drie. En geniet ervan,Ceescamel (talk) 10:13, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Hoi Ceescamel, ik heb een foto kunnen maken van het AFrikahuis. Was helaas wel tegen de zon in. Als ik ooit een keer laat in de middag in de buurt ben maak ik er nog een. Van de bruggen in het Sarphatipark heb ik er al eentje gemaakt. Ook daar zal ik nog de anderen gaan fotograferen. Groetjes, Alf Alfvanbeem (talk) 19:15, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Conradstraat

Mocht je er weer zijn, graag nog een foto van Tweede Leeghwaterstraat 20-22, dat is de achterkant van Eerste Leeghwaterstraat 9-11, maar heft een totaal ander raamcompositie. Alvast bedankt, of glibbert de camera bij 30C?Ceescamel (talk) 14:39, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Uyllanderbrug

Beste Alf,
De categorie voor de Uyllanderbrug heb je vernoemd tot Category:Brug 2007, Uyllanderbrug met het Amsterdamse brugnummer. Dat vind ik onjuist, omdat de brug niet in de gemeente Amsterdam ligt. In Nederland is alleen de gemeente waar iets in ligt, in dit geval Diemen, bevoegd tot het geven van namen (wet BAG, waarin bruggen een subtype zijn van "kunstwerk" dat weer een "type" (subklasse) is van "openbare ruimte"). Mvg , --Paulbe (talk) 11:05, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Beste Paulbe, hier overlappen de grondgebieden van Diemen en Amsterdam elkaar. Theoretisch ligt de brug in Diemen, maar kennelijk maakt de brug deel uit van een afspraak tussen beide gebieden dat het grondgebied in de praktijk anders ligt. Zie deze officiële bekendmaking met een basis uit de jaren 90. Bovendien heeft Amsterdam geen andere brug 2007 (wel hoger en lager) en is er ook geen andere naam voor de brug bekend. Beide aanduidingen komen in allerlei stukken terug.Ceescamel (talk) 11:54, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

• Neem me niet kwalijk, maar dit vind ik niet een bevredigend antwoord. De brug heeft gewoon een naam, nl "Uyllanderbrug". De brug ligt in de gemeente Diemen, niet slechts theoretisch, en ook niet op de grens of op een overlap. Op de webpagina die je aanhaalt staat dat ook niet anders, het is een besluit van de gemeente Diemen, waarin verwezen wordt naar afspraken met de gemeente Amsterdam. Die afspraken betekenen dus niet dat de brug nu in Amsterdam ligt. --Paulbe (talk) 16:37, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Marnixstraat

Alf, @Milliped: , @Ilonamay: en @Paulbe: , bedankt voor de vele foto's. Ik ga gewoon door. Ik zoek voor een (over)morgen te verschijnen artikel foto's van de Marnixstraat 281, een gemeentelijk monument. Liefst vier (jaja):

• voorgevel Marnixstraat
• achtergevel Westerkade 21 (dus Lijnbaansgracht)
• gevelsteen Marnixstraat met de mededeling Hamer en Bouwershofje
• gevelsteen Marnixstraat met een wapen erop (zwanen links en bladeren rechts met letters SPS en MAB)

Tot slot een verzoek aan Paulbe, wil je nog even op mijn kladblok op de NL kijken over een stukje betreffende de gemeentetelefoon.

Groet,Ceescamel (talk) 16:13, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Met een beetje geluk ben ik er zaterdag of zondag. Dan zal ik zeker foto's maken aldaar! Alfvanbeem (talk) 16:37, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Sorry Cees, heb ik niet Ilonamay (talk) 17:52, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Alf, wil je dan meteen meenemen Marnixstraat 307-315 (Bank) en 317 (HBS) , die staan op de andere hoek.Ceescamel (talk) 13:36, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Zal ik doen! Alfvanbeem (talk) 18:50, 15 June 2017

Hoi Ceescamel, hier de links voor 218.

Andere gebouwen moet ik nog even verwerken! Groet Alfvanbeem (talk) 21:34, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

(UTC)

Ik heb ze opgepakt, rustig aan; het is warmCeescamel (talk) 12:37, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Hoi Ceescamel, het is inderdaad erg warm. Hier de foto's van de andere gebouwen. Ik hoop dat het verder de juiste zijn, want de nummering was nogal vreemd.

File:Marnixstraat_317.jpg

File:Marnixstraat 317-309.jpg

File:Marnixstraat 309-315.jpg

Groetjes Alfvanbeem (talk) 18:20, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Nieuwe verzoeken

Alf, @Milliped: , @Ilonamay: en @Paulbe: , ik heb weer een aantal nieuwe verzoeken. Ik ga langzaam de Lijnbaansgracht af, maar ja dat is dan wel de langste met behoorlijk wat gebouwen. Ik zoek foto's van:

• Lijnbaansgracht 244,

• 246  Done
• 254,
• 255,
• voorts de achtergevel van het laatste pand in de Korte Leidsedwarsstraat, direct te herkennen aan geen ingang.

• Elandsgracht 113, hoek Lijnbaansgracht; graag ook een foto van de windvaan bovenop de erker.

• Brug 75, Utrechtsestraat/Prinsengracht
• Wellicht ook foto's van Reguliersgracht 134-136 (hoekpand)

• en Reguliersgracht 11, een oude school. Komen tzt bij het afgaan van de Lijnbaansgracht ook aan de beurt
• grote flat aan het Lambertus Zijlplein en ingang aan de Nolensstraat; wie krijgt de flat op één kiek?
• Karel Appel was hier, een gevelteken aan de gevel van Dapperstraat 7 en aan de overkant van de Mauritskade JC Bloem.
• de 3 woonblokken Marnixstraat 214-220, 222-232 en 234-238 (deze kunnen later want staan volgens mij nu in de steigers)
• woontoren De Spakler aan de Spaklerweg (denk aan de nek!, misschien even fotoshoppen, want het gebouw is toch lelijk...)
• Gruttobrug in Amsterdam-Noord,
• Frans Brandtbrug en

• Anton Geesinkbrug en aldaar ook het kunstwerk

• The dutch Windmill in de Bep van Klaverenboulevard
• Liesbeth den Uylbrug in Buitenveldert
• Brug 110 en 112 over de Lauriergracht (aan de zijde Lijnbaansgracht en Prinsengracht

• brug 113, een duiker, op de cruising Middenweg, Kruislaan.
• brug 408 C. Schuystraat/Breitnerstraat

• Juicy light, kunst boven de Ten Katemarkt (@Milliped: en @Paulbe: , bij hun in de buurt)
• Brug 131, 's Gravesandestraat, vanaf de zijkant en zitje.
• Noorderparkbrug, gezien de grootte wellicht een reportage???
• Brug 147 en 2275, over de Westertoegang
• Vijf bruggen op het Zeeburgereiland

Brug 57P

• Maria Skłodowska-Curiebrug in Amsterdam-Oost over de ringvaart; de is in aanbouw .

Maar doe rustig aan met dit weer,Ceescamel (talk) 14:53, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

• Neem me niet kwalijk, Ik kan eventjes niet zo veel doen (komt later wel weer). --Paulbe (talk) 15:02, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
  • Ik ben tot vrijdag in Parijs, kan nadien wel met de groothoeklens en de fisheye op pad. Milliped (talk) 16:12, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
    • Jullie kunnen gewoon afvinken, als je iets vastgelegd hebt. Dan voorkomen "we" dat "we" dubbel werk doen.Ceescamel (talk) 09:42, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
      • In de loop van de zaterdag zal ik de rest van de foto's die ik boven vermeld heb om te verwerken nog doen. Maar als een van de andere fotografen beter materiaal heeft of kan maken, is dat natuurlijk zeer werlkom! Groetjes, Alfvanbeem (talk) 21:31, 23 June 2017 (UTC)@Ceescamel: Al wat foto's.
      • Ik heb de foto's die ik kon gebruiken weer gewist hier en afgevinkt, hartelijke dank.Ceescamel (talk) 09:53, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Voor al je prachtige werken die jij aan WikiCommons hebt gedoneerd. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 21:35, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Vlucht van een kaketoe

Kunstwerk

Als je weer eens in Amsterdam bent, zou jij dan foto's willen maken van dit kunstwerk. Het is gemonteerd in de fietstunnel onder de President Kennedylaan (nabij de Rijnstraat). Er is voor mijn toestel een ongelukkige lichtval. Ik heb een redelijke foto kunnen bewaren voor het artikel, maar daar mag gerust overheen geplaatst worden.Ceescamel (talk) 13:53, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

Van de beeldbank

Zou je voor mij over kunnen zetten https://beeldbank.amsterdam.nl/afbeelding/010043000002_098 en https://beeldbank.amsterdam.nl/afbeelding/010097001972. Een van de twee mag dan als bovenste foto toegevoegd worden in het artikel Honthorststraat als bewijs, dat die op de oude Hobbemakade is aangelegd. Alvast bedankt,Ceescamel (talk) 11:24, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

@Ceescamel: Ze zijn geupload, maar ik weet niet precies waar ik de foto moet plaatsen. Moet dat ipv de bovenste foto of erboven?

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Museumplein,_Afbeeldingsbestand_010097001972.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Buurt_YY_(Kadastrale_sectie_B).jpg

Ik heb de kaart ingevoegd. Het schilderij toch maar niet, want ik zie nu pas, dat ze de hele Boerenwetering heeft weggemoffeld..... Die huizen op de achtergrond aan de Ruysdaelkade lijken er nog te staan. Beste wensen,Ceescamel (talk) 15:24, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

@Ceescamel: Ok. Ook jij de beste wensen. Geweldig werk dat je levert! Groetjes.

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Loots limonade reclamespeldje.JPG

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Loots limonade reclamespeldje.JPG, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 22:58, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

https://beeldbank.amsterdam.nl/afbeelding/OSIM00008000474

Beste Alf, Mogen wij inmiddels genieten van https://beeldbank.amsterdam.nl/afbeelding/OSIM00008000474; de watertoren van Sloten,Ceescamel (talk) 15:47, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

Hoi @Ceescamel: , hier is de link

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jacob_Marisstraat,_Afb_OSIM00008000474.jpg

Groet.

Brug 348, Zeilbrug, 1922.jpg

Je bent genept met foto -Brug 348, Zeilbrug, 1922.jpg-. Daar staat niet 1922, maar 1999, de datum dat de nwe brug werd opgeleverd.....Aan de zuidzijde zou nog anno 1926 te zien zijn.Ceescamel (talk) 15:19, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

Picture of the month

Hello Alf, one of your files is now the current picture of the month in the German shipping portal. Groets --Ein Dahmer (talk) 18:44, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Model confusion

Hi!
I noticed a small confusion between 2 models for the name you gave to a picture you made in the Musée de l'Aventure Peugeot: this "1957 Peugeot 203 Cabriolet" is apparently not from 1957 and most probably not a 203 Cabriolet but more likely a 1936 301 D Coupé (confirmed, if needed, here)
Do you mind if I ask for a renaming for this file? Or maybe will you prefer do it?
Regards. -- BarnCas (talk) 23:57, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi @BarnCas: , please go ahead.

I am always happy if people correct stuff for me, that is wrongly named or spelled or so.
Thanks in advance and keep up the good work. :)
Alfvanbeem (talk) 06:26, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

 Uitgevoerd -- BarnCas (talk) 20:02, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Tipsor Beirens, cardboard beer advertising.JPG

@Alfvanbeem: zou dit bier van de Brouwerij Beirens te Wommelgem kunnen zijn? Ik vraag het maar omdat ik tegen deze afbeelding aanliep. Lotje (talk) 06:06, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Hoi @Lotje: , ik denk dat je gelijk hebt.

Groetjes, Alfvanbeem (talk) 13:59, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Fijn, bedankt Alfvanbeem dan kan ik de category gelijk toevoegen. :-) Lotje (talk) 14:23, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Vaucanson réalisant son célèbre canard, Laurent Grenoble, Musée des Automates, pic-021.JPG

File:Vaucanson réalisant son célèbre canard, Laurent Grenoble, Musée des Automates, pic-021.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Racconish ^💬 11:03, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8310 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !

Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !

Bonne journée,

Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:50, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Somewhere in Vienna ...

Hi Alf van Beem, you could make life of people caring for images much easier, when you try to add as much information as possible to your uploaded images. The name of the street, the name of the building, or coordinates. If nobody knows what is shown on the images, there is not much value in uploading the image. just my thoughts. regards --Herzi Pinki (talk) 19:07, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Rührfix.JPG

File:Rührfix.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 09:46, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

OSIM00003005144

Voor het artikel over de Van Noordtgracht zou ik graag deze willen hebben. Alvast bedankt,Ceescamel (talk) 11:16, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Hoi Ceescamel.

Hij staat hier https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Van_Noordtkade_20,_Afb_OSIM00003005144.jpg

Over een paar maandjes ga ik een heleboel foto's van het door medewerkers van het stads archief zelf uploaden.

Succes ermee.

Alf

https://beeldbank.amsterdam.nl/afbeelding/OSIM00005005171

Zou je deze willen downloaden voor het artikel Jubileumbank Vondelpark? Bedankt alweer,Ceescamel (talk) 13:31, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Hoi @Ceescamel: .

Hij staat hier https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bank_in_het_rosarium_ter_gelegenheid_van_het_75-jarig_bestaan_van_het_Vondelpark,_Afbeeldingsbestand_OSIM00005005171.jpg

Alf

Happy holidays 2020!

		* Happy Holidays 2020, Alfvanbeem! *
		Vrolijk Kerstfeest en een Gelukkig Nieuwjaar! Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohe Weihnachten und einen guten Rutsch ins neue Jahr!    -- Lotje talk 16:27, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Ringers Likeur bonbons doosje, foto1.JPG

File:Ringers Likeur bonbons doosje, foto1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DiegoAma (talk) 02:56, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Renaming of 3 of your files

Hi!
I took the liberty of asking for a renaming for these 3 files: Renault Dauphinoise photo 1, Renault Dauphinoise photo 2.JPG and Renault Dauphinoise photo 3.JPG: the van doesn't have the 1953 metal fold above the windshield, so it can't be a 1956-60 Dauphinoise. It can only be a 1939-53 Juvaquatre Camionnette.
The still present trafficators are certainly a hint for a more precise identification of the possible model years, but I don't know for now when they were replaced by blinkers. --- Regards, BarnCas (talk) 02:10, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi @BarnCas: Thank you very much. Regards Alf — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 109.36.138.55 (talk) 08:09, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

 Renaming done! --- BarnCas (talk) 00:30, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Nationale oldtimerdag Zandvoort 2010, Abarth Fiat, pic3.JPG

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Nationale oldtimerdag Zandvoort 2010, Abarth Fiat, pic3.JPG, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

And also:

• File:Nationale oldtimerdag Zandvoort 2010, Abarth Simca 2mila pic3.JPG

Yours sincerely, Jonteemil (talk) 23:57, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Brug 327

Voor het verhaal over brug 327 heb ik foto [1] of wel foto UZFA00066000001 graag hier. Ik weet echter niet hoe hem te catalogiseren, gewoon maar onder de Beltbrug lijkt me het logisch. Op deze tekening staan twee verdwenen bruggen waaronder een oude 327, alvast bedankt,Ceescamel (talk) 12:58, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

En ook als je wilt: https://archief.amsterdam/beeldbank/detail/c8519939-31b3-c182-9062-36190a92e95f. Er staan twee verdwenen bouwwerken op. Geef even een seintje of je er (nog) tijd voor hebt,Ceescamel (talk) 14:50, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Hoi @Ceescamel: , had je eerste mail niet gezien.
Ze staan onder de volgende links...
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Terrein_tusssen_de_Tweede_Hugo_de_Grootstraat_en_de_Haarlemmerweg,_met_enige_fantasie_gezien_in_vogelvlucht_in_noordelijke_richting,_Afbeeldingsbestand_UZFA00066000001.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Luchtfoto_Bijlmer_Centrum,_Afbeeldingsbestand_B00000036154.jpg

Nieuw verzoek; kan je deze [https://archief.amsterdam/beeldbank/detail/5d0bfaea-2b85-0ae7-beab-b671ea7e2052 foto overzetten; ik hem gebruiken bij diverse verdwenen bruggen; want het is hier totaal veranderd,Ceescamel (talk) 11:40, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

File:Karpaty (ship, 2013) IMO 9582506 Vlothaven.JPG

File:Karpaty (ship, 2013) IMO 9582506 Vlothaven.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mr.Nostalgic (talk) 05:57, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Thank you

Coinicidentally, I just noted that you have started working on Wikipedia exactly 9 years ago. Specifically, I want to thank you for the nice photos on www.alustir.com/.../liebherr-sr-714-lgp/ --NearEMPTiness (talk) 10:43, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi @NearEMPTiness: , thank you. We try to keep up the good work! ;)

Regards,

Alf

Watertoren aan de C van Eesterenlaan

Nou Alf en @Milliped: ; een mooie opdracht. Ik wil graag een of meerdere foto's van de watertorenflat aan de C van Eesterenlaan. Daar loopt in de gevel na schemering een lichtkunstwerk met wisselende kleuren en dat gaat niet met mijn simpele telefoon, dus aan het werk:-)Ceescamel (talk) 11:22, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Waar is de foto genomen

Dag Alfvanbeem, bij het toevoegen van categorieën aan foto's kwam ik deze foto tegen zonder omschrijving. Kun je me zeggen waar deze foto is genomen en wat het voorstelt, zodat een juiste categorie kan worden toegevoegd? Alvast bedankt, Wouter (talk) 20:42, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

@Wouterhagens: Dekschuiten in Havenkom-C in Amsterdam.

Groet, Alf

Bedankt. Ik zag dat Vysotsky het bericht kennelijk ook heeft gelezen en direct al een omschrijving en categorie heeft toegevoegd. Groet, Wouter (talk) 20:47, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Hulp nodig

Hallo Alfvanbeem, omdat Mr.Nostalgic tot mijn grote spijt het project verlaten heeft... kom ik bij jou terecht. hier vroeg ik me af of het nou "Goos van 't Hull" dan wel "Goosen van 't Hull" is. Ik gok op Wethouder Publieke Werken Goos van 't Hull. Wil je mij een duwtje in de goede richting geven? Lotje (talk) 06:33, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Hoi @Lotje: , kijk eens op deze link. Ik denkdat deze persoon het is.

P.S.

Door het aantal aardige reacties die ik gekregen heb, ben ik aan het overwegen om toch maar door te gaan. Maar ik neem eerst even pauze om wat energie te krijgen.

Groetjes,

Alf

Wat een aangename verrassing, you made my day! Een schouderklopje, zo nu en dan kan, zoals seelenstreichelened zijn. :-) Neem gerust een break(je)... Lotje (talk) 15:42, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Your photographs of ships

Hi, I very much appreciate your recent uploads of ships at the Port of Rotterdam. Very interesting! Thank you! Best regards, Mosbatho (talk) 19:39, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Monumentaal

Zie w:c:User_talk:Mr.Nostalgic#Uw_monumentale_werk. Welbedankt, Hansmuller (talk) 09:25, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Beeldbank

Beste Alf, kan je [2] overzetten. Op deze foto is nl de oude versie van brug 1145 te zien. Alvast bedankt,Ceescamel (talk) 12:53, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Blij

Blij dat je besloten hebt om door te gaan. Denk je dan nog even aan mijn verzoekje van boven en....Mocht je weer eens in Amsterdam-Zuid zijn; dan is er eeo foto nodig van de gedenksteen van de Maranathakerk aan de Hunzestraat. Die is zichtbaar vanaf de Uiterwaardenstraat; geveldeel naast de muurmozaïek. Ik krijg hem met mijn beperkte camera niet goed. Tot slot heb ik je GLO-school no 88 "verhuisd" van de Haarlemmerweg naar de Tasmanstraat, daar waar hij staat, dat is wel zo handig :-)Ceescamel (talk) 14:23, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Hallo Alfvanbeem, leuk dat je er weer bent. :-). File:Opdracht Maranathakerk Kwinderstraat van Hervormde Kerk, Bestanddeelnr 907-3178.jpg: Kan het zijn dat daar een typo zit? kuinderstraat i.p.v. Kwinderstraat? Thanks. Lotje (talk) 14:55, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

hier dan natuurlijk ook als mijn stelling correct is. Lotje (talk) 14:57, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

@Lotje: Dat klopt; het is de Kuinderstraat; er staan er 4 of 5 verkeerd; alle zwart-witfoto's van dat mozaïek vermelden ook de verkeerde naam (mz Raymond Both ipv P. Both),Ceescamel (talk) 10:46, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

@Lotje: . Ik heb het NA gemaild dat er foutieve adressen en namen zijn vermeld. In hoeverre kan ik de lemma's aanpassen? Is er iets dat moet blijven staan?Ceescamel (talk) 13:51, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

@Ceescamel: om heel eerlijk te zijn, daar moet ik het antwoord schuldig blijven. @Vysotsky: doet het wel af en toe. Ik zou het in de "File information" meteen correct plaatsen, zo kan er later geen discussie zijn, meen ik. :-) Lotje (talk) 13:54, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Verschrijvingen en tikfouten verbeter je zonder verdere plichtplegingen. Bij verbetering van verkeerde toeschrijvingen stelt het archief uiteraard een mailtje op prijs. Als je maar een spoor van twijfel hebt over je eigen verbetering, gebruik je een doorstreping van de originele tekst (maar laat je die wel staan). Vysotsky (talk) 14:13, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Square (ship, 2007) ENI 02329482, Port of Rotterdam pic2.JPG

File:Square (ship, 2007) ENI 02329482, Port of Rotterdam pic2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rennboot (talk) 15:04, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Doll floating in the water in Nancy, pic1.JPG

File:Doll floating in the water in Nancy, pic1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:29, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Doll floating in the water in Nancy, pic2.JPG

File:Doll floating in the water in Nancy, pic2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:29, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Felicitatie voor een WikiUil 2020

Tenzij ik mij sterk vergis gebruik jij ook Mr.Nostalgic als sokpop. Als dat klopt is het waarschijnlijk aardig om te weten dat je een WikiUil hebt gekregen voor je bijdragen met foto's. Helaas niet als Gebruiker:Alfvanbeem, wat mijn voorkeur had.--Stunteltje (talk) 10:23, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Victory Monument pic1.JPG

And also:

• File:Victory Monument pic2.JPG

Yours sincerely, Labattblueboy (talk) 21:14, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Gregory the Illuminator statue on the facade of Saint Peter's Basilica.JPG

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:02, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Outside pieces photo-11.JPG

And also:

• File:Outside pieces photo-12.JPG
• File:Outside pieces photo-15.JPG
• File:Outside pieces photo-16.JPG
• File:Outside pieces photo-17.JPG

Yours sincerely, M.nelson (talk) 14:26, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Category:Sonderkraftfahrzeuge_(Sd.Kfz.)

Sonderkraftfahrzeuge (Sd.Kfz.) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Josh (talk) 00:09, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Porte de Paris (La Defence).JPG

File:Porte de Paris (La Defence).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 13:23, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Veedol at the Freie Tankstelle Hans Hummel in Weinheim pic2.JPG

File:Veedol at the Freie Tankstelle Hans Hummel in Weinheim pic2.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: Request by owner per Ticket:2021081910007501. Photo was obviously taken from private ground, permission from owner is necessary and not given. Attempted theft of the displayed items.) Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Mussklprozz.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 07:11, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Plus que quelques jours pour participer à Wiki Loves Monuments France !

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est ouvert pour une semaine encore, jusqu'au 30 septembre. Déjà plus de 6 000 photos ont été importées cette année alors vous aussi rejoignez le concours ! Cette campagne de contribution concerne tous les monuments et objets mobiliers présents dans la base Mérimée et dans la base Palissy. De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la verrière décorative au reliquaire, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Vous pouvez dès à présent mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments et objets du patrimoine français. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:34, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Unimog pics

Hi Alfvanbeem, have a look at de:Unimog-Museum, I used some of your great pics. btw: A part of the deletion requests on your page are quite amusing, I never fail to be surprised about all the things that are forbidden on Commons... Best Regards, Pittigrilli (talk) 16:08, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

File tagging File:Liebherr unknown type p4.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Liebherr unknown type p4.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : 0b1010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 14:05, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Category:Former_companies_of_the_Netherlands

Former companies of the Netherlands has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

212.174.190.23 12:45, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

FM 2400 pic1

Hello Alfvanbeem, you once uploaded this picture: Since you know best what the depicted object is, please add a more detailed description and categorise it, thank you. Kind regards Feyth (talk) 22:02, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Buildng near Philharmonie Luxembourg.jpg

File:Buildng near Philharmonie Luxembourg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 15:52, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:What did you do in the Great War card, Musée Somme 1916, pic-072.JPG

Copyright status: File:What did you do in the Great War card, Musée Somme 1916, pic-072.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:What did you do in the Great War card, Musée Somme 1916, pic-072.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 00:53, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

File:What did you do in the Great War card, Musée Somme 1916, pic-072.JPG

File:What did you do in the Great War card, Musée Somme 1916, pic-072.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

De728631 (talk) 13:37, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Gevelstenen Zwanenplein

Hai, ik heb je verzameling enigszins geplunderd door het artikel Gevelstenen Zwanenplein,Ceescamel (talk) 16:14, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Cropping

Hi. Do you mind, if I crop your photos File:1972 Chrysler Imperial Le Baron photo-3.JPG and File:1972 Chrysler Imperial Le Baron photo-2.JPG to 5/3 proportions, to expose long car better, instead of uploading new image? Regards Pibwl (talk) 22:10, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Greetings & thanks

Hi Alfvanbeem! Just a quick message to thank you for the great images you took of the Spyker 60 HP on view at the Louwman Museum and to tell you I've used some of them for the article I just created: en:Spyker 60 HP (I'd like to use more of them but the article, as yet, is too short.) Cheers! Technopat (talk) 15:15, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 1.JPG

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 1.JPG, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

And also:

• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 10.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 11.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 12.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 13.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 14.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 15.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 16.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 17.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 18.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 19.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 2.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 20.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 21.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 22.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 23.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 24.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 25.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 26.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 28.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 29.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 3.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 30.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 31.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 32.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 33.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 34.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 35.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 36.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 37.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 38.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 39.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 4.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 40.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 41.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 42.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 43.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 44.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 45.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 46.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 47.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 48.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 49.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 5.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 50.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 51.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 52.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 53.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 54.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 55.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 56.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 57.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 6.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 7.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 8.JPG
• File:Modellbahnwelt Odenwald Bild 9.JPG

Yours sincerely, A.Savin 13:17, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:1964 Ferrari 250LM, 12 cylinder, 320cv, 3286cm3, 290kmh, photo 2.JPG

Copyright status: File:1964 Ferrari 250LM, 12 cylinder, 320cv, 3286cm3, 290kmh, photo 2.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:1964 Ferrari 250LM, 12 cylinder, 320cv, 3286cm3, 290kmh, photo 2.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Xunks (talk) 03:27, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Anti-Natopostzegel van PSP in Nieuwspoort gepresenteerd anti-Natopostzegels, Bestanddeelnr 927-1924.jpg

File:Anti-Natopostzegel van PSP in Nieuwspoort gepresenteerd anti-Natopostzegels, Bestanddeelnr 927-1924.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : JopkeB.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 08:57, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

File:Anti-Natopostzegel van PSP in Nieuwspoort gepresenteerd Bram van de Lek met ant, Bestanddeelnr 927-1925.jpg

File:Anti-Natopostzegel van PSP in Nieuwspoort gepresenteerd Bram van de Lek met ant, Bestanddeelnr 927-1925.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : JopkeB.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 05:39, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Sarcophagi in Roskilde Cathedral pic11.JPG

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 01:15, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

File:V&D Broadcast Records, photo 2.JPG

File:V&D Broadcast Records, photo 2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Havang(nl) (talk) 14:56, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

File:КрAз 255 6x6 pic8.JPG

File:КрAз 255 6x6 pic8.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2003:E0:2F11:E000:1C46:D978:EA1A:185B 06:55, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MV Agusta 250cc No32 noBG.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 18:14, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Centenaire du chemin de fer Luxembourgois coin.JPG

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 03:29, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Windmill on Levkas beach, pic1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality but please add geocode if possible --Imehling 17:50, 16 November 2023 (UTC) @Imehling Thank you for your review. Is it OK now? L'OrfeoGreco 23:42, 16 November 2023 (UTC) Thanks --Imehling 07:24, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Kadijksplein

Kadijksplein 4

Hoe is het met je? Je bent hier gefopt. Onlangs het straatnaambord aan de gevel is dit Kadijksplein 4 (nummer rechts boven de deur). Laagte Kadijk nummert aan de overkant achterelkaar door. Aan de overkant stonden immers pakhuizen,Ceescamel (talk) 12:25, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Hoi Cesscamel,

O daar hebben ze mij ook gefopt.

Hier alles goed. Niet veel ontwikkelingen. Veel aan het uploaden, nu van het Rijksmuseum weer 100.000 objecten.

Met jou ook alles goed?

Groetjes, Alfvanbeem (talk) 12:49, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Nivea Toverboek, foto 2.JPG

And also:

• File:Nivea Toverboek, foto 4.JPG
• File:Nivea Toverboek, foto 6.JPG
• File:Nivea Toverboek, foto 3.JPG
• File:Nivea Toverboek, foto 5.JPG
• File:Nivea Toverboek, foto 7.JPG
• File:Nivea Toverboek, foto 1.JPG
• File:Nivea Toverboek, foto 8.JPG

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 01:36, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Brug 149 Bullebak

Beste Alfvanbeem, nu de renovatie van de brug is afgerond, vraag ik me af of je af en toe een actuele foto zou kunnen maken. Ik zou er erg blij mee zijn. Met dank en groeten - Klaus 2A04:4540:6B32:A400:55A8:83D5:8CDC:4A66 11:40, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

File:European Public Prosecutor's Office (EPPO).jpg

File:European Public Prosecutor's Office (EPPO).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 10:30, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

VW Type 1

Hi. I'm not an expert on VW, but is it 1956 for sure? File:1956 Volkswagen II, Dutch licence registration AM-79-52, pic3.JPG. German Wikipedia claims, that larger rectangular rear window was only from 1957. Pibwl (talk) 15:19, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Abbaye Saint-Pierre de Maillezais, pic-014.JPG

And also:

• File:Abbaye Saint-Pierre de Maillezais, pic-015.JPG
• File:Abbaye Saint-Pierre de Maillezais, pic-016.JPG
• File:Abbaye Saint-Pierre de Maillezais, pic-017.JPG

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:51, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Calvé-Delft Recepten uit Grootmoeders jonge jaren, foto 2.JPG

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Calvé-Delft Recepten uit Grootmoeders jonge jaren, foto 2.JPG, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 11:32, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

File:Plastik poppetjes met magnetische hoofdjes die elkaar kunnen kussen pic1.JPG

File:Plastik poppetjes met magnetische hoofdjes die elkaar kunnen kussen pic1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:30, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

File:Plastik poppetjes met magnetische hoofdjes die elkaar kunnen kussen pic2.JPG

File:Plastik poppetjes met magnetische hoofdjes die elkaar kunnen kussen pic2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:31, 24 November 2024 (UTC)