User talk:AFBorchert/Archives/2023

A barnstar for you!

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	Thank you for bringing positivity on this project. ─ The Aafī (talk) 08:00, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

This file...

Hi @AFBorchert, Several months ago I found File:Vasanthi WMF Profile Photo.jpg marked as own work, and left a message on the file talk page mentioning the uploader, who happens to be a WMF employee. I had a doubt at that time about this image having been photographed by someone else but I assumed good faith thinking that a WMF employee must be aware of these things. Do you think my doubts back then were appropriate and such files do need an explanation as to how these are own work? Best, ─ The Aafī (^talk) 14:26, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Hi The Aafī, your concerns regarding that portrait are justified and you did the right think by asking friendly. I would recommend, however, to do this on the talk page of the uploader. Not all WMF staff members are familiar with copyright law and continually active that they notice a notification on a file talk page. Please note, however, that even if someone else took the photograph after precise instructions of the depicted person, the copyright remains with the person giving the instructions. Copyright requires originality and this is more than just pressing a button. See also the interesting discussion at Commons talk:Own work#Possible incorrect claim. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 15:04, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

This adds new and interesting issues to my knowledge. Thanks for the link. ─ The Aafī (^talk) 15:15, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Vandalismus

Hallo, dieser Löschantrag hier https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:St._Joseph_(Köln-Braunsfeld)_(3).jpg ist doch wohl Vandalismus oder da will mich dieser neu angemeldete User ärgern. Neu angemeldet und weiß sofort um solche Abläufe. Kannst du da als Admim eingreifen? Kenne mich mit den Gepflogenheiten bei Commons nicht so aus. Danke! --Chris06 (talk) 14:25, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Hallo Chris06, ich habe mich darum gekümmert: Der unsinnige Löschantrag ist beendet und den entsprechenden Benutzer habe ich verwarnt. Viele Grüße, AFBorchert (talk) 14:38, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Vielen Dank dir! --Chris06 (talk) 14:39, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Frage zu Gepflogenheiten auf Commons

Hallo, da du mir rund um meine laufende Adminkandidatur schon hilfreiche Dinge gesagt hast hier noch eine Frage an Dich. Mir ist im Zusammenhang mit eben dieser Kandidatur eine zurückgenommene Stimme einer sehr offensichtlichen Sockenpuppe aufgefallen, die auf de.WP auch als solche gesperrt ist. Der Hauptaccount ist hier ebenfalls gesperrt, die Socke scheint, soweit ich das im Rahmen einer eher schnellen Prüfung nachvollziehen konnte, hier konstruktiv mitzuwirken und vor allem Bilder von Stolpersteinen hochzuladen, bzw. zu kategorisieren und umzubenennen. Wie geht man hier auf Commons üblicherweise mit solchen Themen um? Sollte man einen Checkuserantrag stellen, oder eher nichts unternehmen, solange der neue Account nicht auffällig wird? Kritzolina (talk) 18:10, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Hallo Kritzolina, die Stimme ist mir ebenfalls aufgefallen. Auf Commons greifen wir in solchen Fällen nur ein, wenn es zu einem Missbrauch der Sockenpuppen auf unserem Projekt kommt. Die Existenz mehrerer Sockenpuppen-Konten alleine ist kein Problem, nur deren missbräuchlicher Einsatz (etwa mehrere Socken in einer Diskussion oder einer Abstimmung oder Hochladen zuvor gelöschter Bilder mit einer neuen Socke). Aber wir sperren nicht, nur weil bereits anderswo gesperrt worden ist. Aber bei einem CU-Fall können natürlich Kenntnisse aus anderen Projekten mitverwertet werden. Und es ist natürlich immer angemessen, solche Fälle im Auge zu behalten. Somit ist es für die deutschsprachigen Admins auf Commons sinnvoll, de:WP:CUA zu beobachten und jeweils zu sehen, ob dies für Commons relevant ist. Viele Grüße, AFBorchert (talk) 19:03, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Danke für diese ausführliche und klare Antwort, ich hatte schon so etwas vermutet - aber wollte natürlich sicher gehen. Einen schönen Abend dir noch! Kritzolina (talk) 19:18, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

File:Al-Azhar Mosque interior DSCF4452.jpg and similar from Egypt

COM:FOP isn't very clear about FoP in Egypt when it comes to public interiors. What do you think should be best course of action in these cases. I am of the view that a DR is justified but I look forward to hearing your insightful opinion. Best, ─ The Aafī (^talk) 16:13, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi The Aafī, unfortunately I have no deeper insight regarding Egypt copyright law. According to COM:FOP Egypt this includes art “displayed in a public place, or works of architecture”. I do not see an exclusion of interiors here nor criteria what for interiors that are considered public. The term “public place” appears just twice in the Egypt copyright law. The only other location is in article 169 according to which broadcasting organizations “have the right to broadcast works performed in any public place”. It is hard to imagine that this right would extend to interiors. Hence, I get the impression that Egypt freedom of panorama does not include interiors. However, before filing a DR we should check whether FOP is required for this case. The description of File:Al-Azhar Mosque interior DSCF4452.jpg includes following remark by the uploader R Prazeres: “The stucco may date from the Fatimid period, as Fatimid-era stucco remains are noted by scholarly descriptions, but I can't confirm for this particular section of stucco.” If this stucco would indeed be from the Fatimid period then it is more than 1000 years old and in the public domain. I do not know whether this is likely as I have neither reference works for the Al-Azhar Mosque nor any knowledge about Islamic art and architecture, I've just some familiarity with medieval architecture in Ireland, France, and Germany. I wouldn't file a DR without researching this any further. Firstly, regarding FOP for interiors in Egypt it could be helpful to have a discussion at COM:VPC. Secondly, images like this warrant always extra research. It would be a pity to lose that image if we could keep it. And even it is a modern work, it would be helpful to research the year as {{PD-Egypt}} could apply. According to the Wikipedia article, many modern additions were done during the Ottoman period which are in the public domain now. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 17:05, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

This much is helpful for me and thanks for pointing out to right venues where I can initiate such discussions if needed. ─ The Aafī (^talk) 18:08, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

If it helps for this particular photo (and others from the same mosque): the stucco is almost certainly not recent, but it just may not be from the Fatimid period. I left that comment in the description specifically because this is the original Fatimid section of the building, so one may assume this detail is Fatimid too, but I had reasons to suspect a later date (e.g. the 18th century renovation), so I wanted to pre-empt a reader's assumption a little. I can't remember if I found the answer later, but didn't have it at the time.

For what it's worth, my non-expert understanding, as per AFBochert's initial remarks above, is that interiors in Egypt fall into FOP as works of architecture (if not already into PD). But, if it did turn out to be more complicated, then the major problematic case that comes to my mind for historic monuments might be some of the Fatimid-origin mosques that were restored by the Bohras in the 1980s-1990s (for some background on that, see the Wikipedia article on Fatimid architecture). Otherwise, I have a hard time thinking of pre-modern historic buildings n Egypt that wouldn't be entirely in PD. Cheers, R Prazeres (talk) 18:43, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Thanks, R Prazeres, for joining the discussion. As outlined above, I'm sceptical whether FOP in Egypt extends to the interior of buildings. The term architecture does not necessarily include also the interior of buildings. But this is best discussed on COM:VPC where we have possibly more expertise with consideration of current case law in Egypt and associated literature. Thanks for the extended remarks about the possible time when this stucco was done. All this makes a PD status more likely. In regard to restaurations: I am not sure about how this is interpreted by Egypt case law but entirely faithful restorations do not have necessarily a copyright of their own. You will get a problem if original parts are missing and have to be remade from scratch. See for exampe File:Carentan Église Notre Dame Vitrail Baie 18 2014 08 24.jpg where most is medieval but some missing panels were recreated in the 20th-century. This case is fortunately saved by a specific provision of French copyright law. In most legislations copyright is about originality, not about the sweat of the brow. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 19:37, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

My request for adminship

Hello! I want to thank you for your participation and input in my recently failed request for adminship. I take every word everybody said in the most constructive way and it is my intention to not only do my best for Commons (as long as time and real life allows me to), but to continue learning and helping out whenever I can. I don't take your oppose vote as something negative, much on the contrary, it is certainly enlightening. I will try to be more careful assessing copyright violations and the likes in the future. Once again, thank you for your vote and I hope to see you again, collaborating around Commons. Have a good day. Bedivere (talk) 03:13, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi Bedivere, thanks again for offering your help. Going on to participate in admin-related areas and to continue learning in this process is the right approach and I am looking forward that your next candidacy will be successful. You are always free to ask me for help or for an opinion. Best wishes, AFBorchert (talk) 22:07, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Just another question...

Hi, Following my recent failed RfA, I have constantly been reviewing my old uploads, and today I have come across File:Nadwatul Musannifeen.jpg. This was a research institution nearby Jama Masjid Delhi and does not exist any more (perhaps since last twenty years). I found this old black and white image in a book which does not mention anything about the work being copyrighted and I assumed then that they were just putting the book in PD, but I am feeling that I am completely mistaken here. Could you please share your insightful ideas on this? The book which contains this image was published in November 1987 and the photographer of this very "b/w image" appears to be anonymous. The book, a special publication about one of its founders, was published from the institute, and it is possible that the photograph is institute's own work. This does not appear to discuss photographs like this. ─ The Aafī (^talk) 20:14, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

The editor is mentioned to be Jameel Mehdi, who died in 1988. That's to say, this black and white photograph is more than 34 years old. However, given the texture of the image, I feel this could be a PD-ineligible case and since India has a very high TOO, this might be kept? ─ The Aafī (^talk) 20:21, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi The Aafī, the image is tagged {{Cc-zero}} for which I see no grounds as this is a license which has to be explicitly chosen by the copyright holder. Next point is that I couldn't immediately verify that this image has indeed be taken from this source as just a link to the beginning of the book is given. If I am looking for p. 553 I'm ending up here where I do not see this image. Instead I find it here at p. 576. Unfortunately I cannot read Urdu script and the page numbering of archive.org can differ from the page numbers within the book. This is the reason why it is important to provide a link directly to the page where the image is to be seen. Now to the copyright status. Copyright notices are not required. Every work of creativity that is covered by copyright law is automatically protected since its creation. This applies to all members of the Berne Convention. The only exception were the United States where a registration was required until they joined the Berne convention in 1989. The image is certainly no case of {{PD-ineligible}} as the quality doesn't matter. I assume that this is a photograph. According to Commons:Copyright rules by territory/India, photographs are protected for 60 years after publication, hence this will become free in India in 2048. I'm afraid this file ought to be deleted. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 22:05, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

@AFBorchert, thanks, this looks helpful again. Could you please delete this image and I'll locally upload it on en-wiki and ur-wiki under fair use rationales, or do you think (as I feel), a regular DR is warranted. ─ The Aafī (^talk) 04:14, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

 Done --AFBorchert (talk) 06:50, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

ticket:2022120610010726

Concerning this DR, could you place take a look at this? ─ The Aafī (^talk) 05:58, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi The Aafī, thanks for the update. I will have a look at it, probably today or tomorrow in the evening (Middle European Time). Best, AFBorchert (talk) 06:35, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

how

how can I upload an image taggin his creator an créatine a completed wikipedia page, née ur help. thank u Someonec (talk) 13:46, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi Someonec, if it is not your own work, we need a written permission from the copyright holders that is passed to the support team. The permission must explicitly name one of the free licenses that conform to COM:L. See here for standard declarations. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 21:53, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Chapelle Saint Fiacre

Magst du bitte mal wieder bei Gelegenheit schauen? Anfang des Monats hat ein Account einen Schwung Bilder [1] aus Internetquellen hochgeladen, umgekehrte Bildersuche zeigt, dass die aus Onlinequellen stammen. Das hier [2] ist sogar ein Screenshot aus Street View. Danke! --Chris06 (talk) 14:33, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Hallo Chris06, ich habe jetzt einige Schnelllöschanträge gestellt. Wenn Du die umgekehrte Bildsuche einsetzt und frühere Publikationen entdeckst, dann kannst Du mit Report copyright violation in der linken Navigationsleiste die URL selbst angeben, um das Verfahren anzustoßen. Bei mir war allerdings die umgekehrte Bildsuche nicht in allen Fällen erfolgreich. Viele Grüße, AFBorchert (talk) 21:50, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Danke dir! Die Bilder sind alle aus dem Netz zusammengeklaut. Dieses hier [3] wurde von einem Joseph Bardot vor zwei Jahren auf Google Maps hochgeladen, kann das nicht verlinken. Das Bild hier [4] stammt von hier [5]. Blieben nur die historischen Bilder übrig. Die Aktion wäre für den neuen Artikel gar nicht nötig gewesen, da auf Commons genug Bilder vorhanden sind. Viele Grüße --Chris06 (talk) 14:21, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Vielen Dank, Chris06, für die zusätzlichen Hinweise! Ich habe jetzt noch Schnelllöschanträge für File:Portail de la chapelle Saint-Friacre.jpg und File:Chapelle Saint-Fiacre de Treffiagat.jpg gestellt. Viele Grüße, AFBorchert (talk) 16:20, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

A blocked user is requesting renaming

Hello AFBorchert. A user blocked by you is requesting a rename on the spanish Wikipedia. Before accepting it, I would like to know if you have no problem with it. LuchoCR (talk) 15:43, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Hi LuchoCR, the user in question was blocked at Commons for repeated uploads of copyvios. I do not see a problem with a rename in this case. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 16:07, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Thank you. Its already done. LuchoCR (talk) 16:43, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Re:Revision Deletion

Please immediately apply Revision Deletion to all editing actions of User:I can't do this anymore, because the user's remarks are extremely disgusting or obscene.

All contributions to enwiki and meta are also handled in this way. In addition, I have archived the user's vandalize record, see [6]. If WMF-global-ban is involved, it can be used as evidence, thank you! Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 07:27, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Hi Fumikas Sagisavas, I had nearly no time this morning, hence I focused first on getting that account blocked and globally locked. I've now hidden the contents of these edits. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 08:38, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Thank you! Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 08:40, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Auflösung Bilder ändern

Hallo Andreas, ich dachte gerade an Dich, Du könntest das sicher machen. Es geht um die Bilder hier: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Interior_of_Dorfkirche_Güstow_(Prenzlau) der Fotograf will aus Copyschutzgründen (kommerz. Nutzung) nur eine geringe Auflösung hochgeladen haben, und zwar 337x599 (kann man ja gleich vom Server so schnappen)

Könntest Du das so ändern (notfalls geringer aufgelöst drüberladen und die alten Versionen löschen)? Das wäre toll (war leider anfangs so nicht klar..). Danach geht dann auch die Genehmigung raus. Gruß & Dank, --Subbass1 (talk) 21:00, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Hallo Subbass1, ich werde mal schauen, ob ich dafür im Laufe des Pfingstwochenendes Zeit finde. Viele Grüße, AFBorchert (talk) 16:38, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Hallo Subbass1, Du hast die Bilder allesamt mit {{Permission pending}} ausgezeichnet, ich kann aber bislang keinen Vorgang dazu bei VRT entdecken. Mir fällt auch auf, dass die Bilder offenbar zuvor auf Facebook publiziert worden sind. Wenn kein Weg an der niedrigen Auflösung vorbeiführt, wäre es vielleicht sinnvoll zu fragen, ob es möglich wäre, dazu die Originale zu bekommen und welche Auflösung für den Urheber gerade noch geht. Die Qualität ließe sich dann wohl noch etwas steigern. Ansonsten, wenn Du nur einfach die niedrige Auflösung vom Server haben möchtest, kannst Du das auch selbst unternehmen und ich gehe dann durch und lösche danach die Bilder mit den höheren Auflösungen. Aber es wäre gut, wenn dann bereits ein Ticket dazu existieren würde. Viele Grüße, AFBorchert (talk) 15:30, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Hallo, er will halt plötzlich (mir nicht recht verständlich) diese Mini-Auflösung haben, obwohl ich ihm die Lizenz CC BY SA 4 vorher genannt und verlinkt habe. Hat halt Angst vor (zwingend möglicher) "kommerzieller Nutzung". Selbst verkleinern/Originale zur Verfügung stellen will er auch nicht mangels Zeit, so bleibt dann eben nur diese Möglichkeit. Dass "permission pending" gesetzt ist, ist völlig okay, so mache ich das grundsätzlich, damit gleich klar ist, dass nicht ich der Urheber bin, und habe dann noch einige Zeit für die Rechtemail, die ich auch immer vorbereite. Also, dann lade ich selbst die Miniversionen drüber (gleich nachher) und Du löschst dann bitte die früheren Versionen- und erst dann sendet er die Mail ab. Grüße --Subbass1 (talk) 15:41, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

@Subbass1: Ok, ich warte dann darauf, dass Du Dich hier meldest, wenn Du selbst die Miniversionen drüber geladen hast. Viele Grüße, AFBorchert (talk) 15:45, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

So, schon passiert, bitte löschen, dann kommt die schon lange vorbereitete Mail. (Qualität durch vielfaches Zwischenspeichern ist ja egal, er will es ja möglichst schlecht...) Danke, --Subbass1 (talk) 16:09, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

@Subbass1: Sehr schade, aber die Löschaktion habe ich jetzt wie besprochen durchgezogen. Ich würde mich über eine Nachricht freuen, wenn das Ticket eröffnet ist. Viele Grüße, AFBorchert (talk) 16:22, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Mir ist's ja egal, vielleicht kommt ja auch ein anderer Wikipedianer bald vorbei. In Brandenburg kommt man wirklich problemlos in jede Dorfkirche, leichter als in Oberbayern oder Schwaben... Grunddaten sind übrigens im Organ index. Und ein Bild in der Außenkategorie müsste noch weg. Gesegnete Pfingsten, Martin Subbass1 (talk) 16:42, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

@Subbass1: Ok, bei File:Güstow (Prenzlau), Dorfkirche (13).jpg habe ich jetzt ebenso die höhere Auflösung gelöscht. Danke, Dir ebenfalls ein gesegnetes Pfingstfest! Viele Grüße, AFBorchert (talk) 17:00, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 - Deutschland

Hallo AFBorchert,

Sieger 2022 – Kloster Paulinzella

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2023 findet zum dreizehnten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM) statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Vergangenes Jahr hat Radomianin mit einer Gesamtansicht von Kloster Paulinzella gewonnen. Welcher Fotograf oder welche Fotografin tritt dieses Jahr die Nachfolge an?

Nach WLM 2022 sind wieder zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden – zum Beispiel die Denkmallisten in Waltershausen in Thüringen oder in Fulda.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Für das einfache Auffinden haben wir eine Upload-Karte erstellt, in der viele aber leider noch nicht alle Kulturdenkmale angezeigt werden können. Das Laden der Objekte dauert dort etwas.

Wir haben dieses Jahr „drei Sonderpreise für Bilder von Friedhöfen“ ausgelobt. Zugelassen sind für den Sonderpreis auch Fotos von Friedhöfen, die nicht denkmalgeschützt sind.

Damit es ab 1. September mit dem Upload schnell geht:

Upload your photos via the new Upload-Map 

Upload your photos for the special price 

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2023 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Vorjury-Tool 

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung. Falls du im nächsten Jahr keine Einladung für Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland haben möchtest, trag dich bitte hier ein. Wir würden das natürlich schade finden, da wir uns auf deine Fotos freuen.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 12:19, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Bitte um Löschung

Hallo Andreas, kannst du bitte File:Sandra Hollins, Angela Romero, 2017-03-08, IMG 0409 (33198515501) (cropped).jpg löschen, habe es gerade versehentlich hochgeladen (nicht der richtige Ausschnitt, falscher Dateiname.) Vielen Dank. GeorgHH • talk   12:59, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Hallo GeorgHH, ist erledigt! Herzliche Grüße, AFBorchert (talk) 13:03, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Bitte um Löschung

Moin Andreas, kannst Du bitte diese Datei löschen?

Es war mein erster Versuch, eine Bilddatei im svg-Format hochzuladen. Hat leider nicht so geklappt, wie ich wollte. Statt der ganzen Karte ist nur ein Ausschnitt hier angekommen. Ich denke, dass ich da noch ein bisschen an der Größe herumbasteln muss. Besten Dank und liebe Grüße, --MicBy67 (talk) 00:34, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

Hallo MicBy67, ist erledigt! Viele Grüße, AFBorchert (talk) 06:12, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

Den allerbesten Dank! Schönes Wochenende, -- MicBy67 (talk) 16:29, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

St Molaise's House‎

Hi AFBorchert, I noticed you deleted the category for St Molaise's House‎ on Devenish, stating the category is a duplicate of the category Teampall Mór. This however is an incorrect statement, as St Molaise's House‎ is a the small oratory building between Teampall Mór and the Round tower. I quote from the government site: There are ruins from different time periods on site; the earliest being St. Molaise house (small church) and the round tower which are 12th Century. A second church from the 13th Century, which was extended over time, was the lower church. The mentioned second church is Teampall Mór, the first one St Molaise's House‎. Could you please re-create the category? Thanks in advance. Kind regards, Otter (talk) 15:07, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi Otter, you are right. Please take my apologies. I've restored the category and its previous contents but I have also added a small description to it which can be helpful. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 15:48, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi AFBorchert, No problem! Thank you! Kind regards, Otter (talk) 17:05, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Apelación: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Partido Socialista Ecuatoriano.png

Hello, how are you, the reason for my appeal Commons:Deletion requests/File:Partido Socialista Ecuatoriano.png I consider and insist is nothing more and nothing less than an update of the logo of the Partido Socialista Ecuatoriano, in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Movimiento revolucion ciudadana.png Explain why the image should be maintained, For this reason the reconsideration Alejandro Palacios Naspud (talk) 03:31, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Hi Alejandro Palacios Naspud, thank you for asking. Both cases differ significantly, leading to different decisions by me as explained in my deletion rationales. In case of File:Movimiento revolucion ciudadana.png we have letters (are below COM:TOO) and the very simplified shape of a flame (also below COM:TOO in judgement of COM:TOO Andean Community and the cited case of the Saturn logo). In contrast to this, File:Partido Socialista Ecuatoriano.png has a far more complex flame, a torch, and a hand holding this. All this goes beyond COM:TOO and no case law is given which would allow me to divert that much from common COM:TOO thresholds. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 10:32, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Savigny – Église Notre-Dame-et-Sainte-Barbe – Abside 2023 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:39, 5 October 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:45, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Savigny – Église Notre-Dame-et-Sainte-Barbe – Nef, vue vers la croisée 2023 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support high quality. --ArildV 12:29, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Savigny – Église Notre-Dame-et-Sainte-Barbe – Nef – Fresque de la Cène 2023 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:31, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

This was posted on my page, seemingly because you forgot to sign the nomination. But it belongs here obviously:

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coutances – Cathédrale Notre-Dame – Baie 9 – Verrière de saint Marcouf 2023 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--Plozessor (talk) 05:41, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fahan St. Mura's Cross (Panorama) 2023 09 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 20:40, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Savigny – Église Notre-Dame-et-Sainte-Barbe – Abside III 2023 08 14.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Savigny – Église Notre-Dame-et-Sainte-Barbe – Abside 2023 08 14.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saussey – Église Saint-Martin – Baie 2 2023 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 06:26, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

Ettlenschieß

Anlässlich des neu erstellten Wiki-Artikels: Gibt's vielleicht noch mehr Bilder, aus denen bestenfalls die Disposition der kleinen Orgel ersichtlich ist? Grüße, --Subbass1 (talk) 20:06, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

Hallo Subbass1, die Orgel in der Georgskirche in Ettlenschieß habe ich noch nicht fotografiert. Ich kann das mal bei passender Gelegenheit nachholen, aber noch keinen Termin nennen. Viele Grüße, AFBorchert (talk) 20:09, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Derry Guildhall Main Hall Pipe Organ 2023 09 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please check again tilt/perspective correction. --C messier 19:34, 17 October 2023 (UTC). Thank you, C messier, you are right. I've redone the perspective correction now. --AFBorchert 20:18, 17 October 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --C messier 12:36, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saussey – Église Saint-Martin – Baie 0 2023 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:18, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tullow St. Columba's Church Organ II 2013 09 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 07:09, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tullow St. Columba's Church Clement Nevill Monument (Panorama) 2013 09 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:39, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saussey – Église Saint-Martin – Maître-autel 2023 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:40, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Derry Guildhall Main Hall Window Top Lights Centre 2023 09 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:56, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quettreville-sur-Sienne – Église Sainte-Marguerite de Contrières – Fonts baptismaux II 2023 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:38, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drogheda St. Peter's Church of Ireland Interior View from Gallery 2022 08 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:04, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saussey – Église Saint-Martin – Baie 2 – Saint Martin 2023 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:33, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saussey – Église Saint-Martin – Baie 2 – Saint Claude 2023 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:44, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicorps – Église Saint-Corneille – Nef 2023 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:44, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coutances – Cathédrale Notre-Dame – Baie 10 – Verrière de saint Lô 2023 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:55, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tullow St. Columba's Church Communion Table and East Window 2013 09 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:02, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicorps – Église Saint-Corneille – Baie 0 2023 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Not sure about the cross in front, but I don't consider it disturbing. --Plozessor 18:24, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Savigny – Église Notre-Dame-et-Sainte-Barbe – La chapelle Sainte Barbe 2023 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 11:17, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicorps – Église Saint-Corneille – Nef II 2023 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 07:30, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tullow St. Columba's Church Nave II 2013 09 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:52, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saussey – Église Saint-Martin – Nef 2023 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Alexander-93 07:01, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Savigny – Église Notre-Dame-et-Sainte-Barbe – Porte d'accès nord 2023 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. ---Giles Laurent 07:34, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drogheda St. Augustine's Church High Altar and East Window (Panorama) 2023 08 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good quality. --Poco a poco 07:36, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quettreville-sur-Sienne – Église Sainte-Marguerite de Contrières – Nef 2023 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:15, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicorps – Église Saint-Corneille – Baie 0 – Saint Corneille 2023 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:00, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicorps – Église Saint-Corneille 2023 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. Perhaps a small vertical correction is needed.--Famberhorst 06:07, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quettreville-sur-Sienne – Église Sainte-Marguerite de Contrières II 2023 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:47, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Longford St. Mel's Cathedral Nave 2019 08 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 19:59, 28 October 2023 (UTC) Nice! Nominate at COM:VIC, too, in the appropriate scope, if there isn't already a VI in scope. -- Ikan Kekek 05:38, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saussey – Église Saint-Martin – Nef II 2023 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:36, 28 October 2023 (UTC) Really good! Without the backpack and such, it might be an FP. With it, I'd probably still vote for it, but I think it probably wouldn't pass. Do you have another similar photo without the bags on the right? -- Ikan Kekek 05:42, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Savigny – Église Notre-Dame-et-Sainte-Barbe – Abside – Cycle de Sainte Barbe 1 2023 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quettreville-sur-Sienne – Église Sainte-Marguerite de Contrières 2023 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 07:53, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Savigny – Église Notre-Dame-et-Sainte-Barbe – Abside – Cycle de Sainte Barbe 0 2023 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 07:54, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicorps – Église Saint-Corneille – Baie 0 – Vierge à l'Enfant 2023 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 07:50, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tullow St. Columba's Church Organ Manuals 2013 09 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:11, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Savigny – Église Notre-Dame-et-Sainte-Barbe – Abside – Chapiteaux I 2023 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:11, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicorps – Église Saint-Corneille – Baie 0 – Saint Jean 2023 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:54, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tullow St. Columba's Church Chancel 2013 09 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:19, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicorps – Église Saint-Corneille – Baie 0 – Saint Étienne 2023 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:35, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quettreville-sur-Sienne – Église Sainte-Marguerite de Contrières – Fonts baptismaux 2023 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:19, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drogheda St. Augustine's Church Father Denis Crotty Memorial Window (Panorama) 2023 08 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 13:17, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicorps – Église Saint-Corneille – Mur nord du chœur – Corbeau oriental 2023 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:04, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Savigny – Église Notre-Dame-et-Sainte-Barbe – Abside – Chapiteaux II 2023 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:04, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coutances – Cathédrale Notre-Dame – Nef 2023 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:37, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drogheda St. Augustine's Church Choir Arch and Sanctuary 2023 08 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:39, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fahan St. Mura's Cross West Face 2023 09 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:39, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicorps – Église Saint-Corneille – Baie 0 – Trinité souffrante au milieu des symboles des Évangélistes 2023 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:47, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fahan St. Mura's Cross in front of old church 2023 09 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:47, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drogheda St. Augustine's Church Nave 2023 08 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:48, 4 November 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:51, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicorps – Église Saint-Corneille – Est 2023 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:39, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicorps – Église Saint-Corneille – Mur nord du chœur – Corbeau central 2023 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:39, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coutances – Cathédrale Notre-Dame – Déambulatoire côté nord – Couvercle de sarcophage trapézoïdal portant une croix ornée 2023 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 09:15, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lessay – Abbaye – Panneau latéral d’un tombeau coffre en bas relief 2022 08 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:48, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Jean-de-la-Rivière Maître-autel d’église Saint-Jean 2022 08 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:48, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Jean-de-la-Rivière – Église Saint-Jean – Baptême du Christ par Henri Gesta 2022 08 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:53, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Jean-de-la-Rivière Chœur d’église Saint-Jean II 2022 08 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:57, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drogheda St. Laurence's Gate 2022 08 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:55, 7 November 2023 (UTC) The right side isn't vertical. --Mike1979 Russia 09:21, 7 November 2023 (UTC) Thanks for the reviews, I've uploaded a new version where the perspective correction has been fixed. --AFBorchert 15:41, 7 November 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 17:14, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicorps – Église Saint-Corneille – Mur nord du chœur – Corbeau occidental 2023 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:28, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicorps – Église Saint-Corneille – Mur sud du chœur – Corbeau oriental 2023 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:21, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coutances – Cathédrale Notre-Dame – Déambulatoire côté nord – Couvercle de sarcophage trapézoïdal portant une croix ornée II 2023 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 07:58, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Germain-sur-Ay Maître-autel d’église Saint-Germain 2022 08 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good photo, but please reduce the purple --Michielverbeek 07:31, 8 November 2023 (UTC) Hm... the purple light comes from a stained glass window. --AFBorchert 08:30, 8 November 2023 (UTC)  Support I have no issue with the purple light. It should stay on the picture as it this naturally there because of the stained glass. Good quality of the picture. --Giles Laurent 20:47, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Germain-sur-Ay Nef d’église Saint-Germain 2022 08 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:29, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coutances – Cathédrale Notre-Dame – Baie 9 – Verrière de saint Marcouf – 4e registre – Rencontre de saint Marcouf et de saint Hélier 2023 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:29, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicorps – Église Saint-Corneille – Mur sud du chœur – Corbeau central 2023 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:30, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Germain-sur-Ay Chapiteaux d'arc de chœur sud d’église Saint-Germain 2022 08 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:17, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tullow St. Columba's Church Nave III 2013 09 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:52, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lessay Abbaye Bas-côté sud 2022 08 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:52, 10 November 2023 (UTC)  Comment Possible FP. I know I said in FPC that I'm bored with straight-on arches into the distance, but this photo is really well done and I would vote for it. Plus it ends in the church, not just with a regular wall. -- Ikan Kekek 00:23, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lessay Abbaye 2022 08 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:22, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drogheda St. Peter's Church of Ireland Nave 2022 08 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:22, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Germain-sur-Ay Chapiteaux d'arc de chœur sud d’église Saint-Germain 2022 08 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:17, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tullow St. Columba's Church Nave III 2013 09 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:52, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lessay Abbaye Bas-côté sud 2022 08 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:52, 10 November 2023 (UTC)  Comment Possible FP. I know I said in FPC that I'm bored with straight-on arches into the distance, but this photo is really well done and I would vote for it. Plus it ends in the church, not just with a regular wall. -- Ikan Kekek 00:23, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Germain-sur-Ay Chapiteaux de chœur d’église Saint-Germain II 2022 08 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:10, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Germain-sur-Ay Fonts baptismaux d’église Saint-Germain 2022 08 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:35, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dundalk St. Nicholas' Church of Ireland Interior 2022 09 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:46, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicorps – Église Saint-Corneille – Mur sud du chœur – Corbeau occidental 2023 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:23, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saussey – Église Saint-Martin – Baie 2 – Décollation de sainte Barbe 2023 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:18, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Savigny – Église Notre-Dame-et-Sainte-Barbe – La chapelle Sainte Barbe – Lavabo 2023 08 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:19, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Longford St. Mel's Cathedral Angel holding a book 2019 08 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:03, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Longford St. Mel's Cathedral The Way of the Cross by Ken Thompson 01 2019 08 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:03, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Map of Turkestan as defined by Britannica..png

Hi, kannst Du bitte die Datei verschieben?

Mir ist versehentlich ein Punkt zuviel in den Dateinamen gelangt ... :(

Beste Grüße, MicBy67 (talk) 22:12, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Hallo MicBy67, ist erledigt! Viele Grüße, AFBorchert (talk) 08:34, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Danke Dir! --MicBy67 (talk) 22:29, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schwäbisch Gmünd Heilig-Kreuz-Münster Chorumgang Sebaldusaltar Predella mit den Nothelfern (Panorama) 2020 08 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:31, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Longford St. Mel's Cathedral The Way of the Cross by Ken Thompson 02 2019 08 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 11:09, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Germain-sur-Ay Église Saint-Germain SE 2022 08 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tower is hanging a bit to the right --Michielverbeek 05:24, 15 November 2023 (UTC) I disagree. The tower gets more narrow at the top, please look at the vertical bar of the upper tower window. --AFBorchert 07:50, 15 November 2023 (UTC) You are right, all other verticals are straight --Michielverbeek 06:17, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Germain-sur-Ay Chapiteaux d'arc de chœur nord d’église Saint-Germain 2022 08 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:36, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Longford St. Mel's Cathedral The Way of the Cross by Ken Thompson 03 2019 08 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:20, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castleboy St. Patrick's Church Interior 2019 09 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:20, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Benrater und Speyer Linie.png

Darf ich Dich noch einmal um Verschiebung bitten? -- MicBy67 (talk) 02:47, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Hallo MicBy67, gerne. Ist erledigt. Viele Grüße, AFBorchert (talk) 05:46, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Danke Dir! --MicBy67 (talk) 14:48, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Longford St. Mel's Cathedral Angel holding a censer III 2019 08 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:43, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Longford St. Mel's Cathedral The Way of the Cross by Ken Thompson 04 2019 08 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:41, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kilclooney More Portal Tomb Dg. 70 North-Eastern Chamber SE 2016 08 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:02, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Lessay Abbaye Bas-côté sud 2022 08 22.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lessay Abbaye Bas-côté sud 2022 08 22.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

File:James J. Sexton(1).png

Please assist with the VRT status File:James J. Sexton(1).png. Ticket#2023120510000308 -> URL of this file was in the email and copyright holder email permission was in the proper format. Thanks, — Preceding unsigned comment added by BeFriendlyGoodSir (talk • contribs) 02:30, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Happy holidays and best wishes!

Happy holidays! Merry christmas! Best wishes for 2024! -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:59, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

*ೃ༄ Feliz Navidad, AFBorchert *ೃ༄ Merry Christmas and a joyous new year filled with peace, love, and happiness! Щасливого Різдва та Нового року, нехай він принесе мир, любов та радість у ваше життя! Joyeux Noël et une Bonne année pleine de paix, d'amour et de bonheur! ¡Feliz Navidad y un próspero año nuevo lleno de paz, amor y felicidad! Buon Natale e un felice anno nuovo pieno di pace, amore e felicità! Frohe Weihnachten und ein gutes neues Jahr voller Frieden, Liebe und Glück! Feliz Natal e um Ano Novo próspero repleto de paz, amor e felicidade! メリークリスマス、そして平和と愛、幸福に満ちた新年おめでとうございます！ 메리 크리스마스와 평화, 사랑, 행복이 가득한 새해 복 많이 받으세요! मेरी क्रिसमस और शांति, प्रेम, और खुशियों से भरा नया साल मुबारक हो! 圣诞快乐，新年快乐，愿你的生活充满和平、爱与幸福！ عيد ميلاد مجيد وسنة جديدة سعيدة مليئة بالسلام والحب والسعادة! С Рождеством и Новым Годом, пусть они принесут мир, любовь и счастье в вашу жизнь! God Jul och Gott Nytt År fyllt med fred, kärlek och lycka! Vrolijk Kerstfeest en een Gelukkig Nieuwjaar vol vrede, liefde en geluk! Wilfredor

Wilfredor (talk) 19:03, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

✴ Happy Holidays, Andreas ✴ Merry Christmas and a happy new year! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Buon Natale e felice anno nuovo! Frohe Weihnachten und ein gutes neues Jahr! Aristeas (talk) 11:06, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Ich danke dir für die Weihnachtsgrüße und wünsche dir auch schöne Festtage und einen guten Rutsch ins neue Jahr! --Chris06 (talk) 08:41, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Frohe Weihnachten und ein glückliches neues Jahr!

wünscht von Herzen Reinhold Möller / Ermell (talk) 11:02, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Ermell (talk) 11:02, 25 December 2023 (UTC)