File:The Lion nebula.jpg
Original file (4,292 × 3,312 pixels, file size: 13.49 MB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Summary
editDescriptionThe Lion nebula.jpg |
English: The Lion Nebula is an extended emission nebula in the constellation Cepheus. Its apparent distance is more than 10,000 light years away from Earth. While it fits nicely within the FOV of my 4" scope reduced to 490mm focal length, it is estimated to be about 250 light years across. (For reference, the diametre of our planet Earth is 0.0425 light seconds across!)
Multiple stars apparently worked in concert to create the Lion's distinctive shape, with at least two hot, massive, eruptive stars known as Wolf-Rayet identified, as well other bubbles/shells of outwardly exploding gases with stars in the centre discovered. Wolf-Rayet stars are bright, highly evolved, and at least twenty solar masses or greater, which is two followed by thirty zeroes, equivalent to ~334,000 times the size of Earth. It always boggles my mind to contemplate these distances, sizes, and masses, not to mention the cosmic dynamics and dancing that is occurring or has occurred. In addition to its lion shape, there are dark nebulae within the "head" region as well as two large ones around the "tail" (B369|LDN1150/LDN1154) along with interstellar matter Ced203. A small cluster of stars in the "mouth" area, right on the "top jaw" is Berkeley 94, and a dark nebula below the "bottom jaw" is LDN1156. An open galactic cluster in the centre of the "head" is Teutsch 127, residing beside the Wolf-Rayet star WR153/GP Cephei and across from orange hypergiant RW Cephei, in between which there are two dark nebulae, one of which (LDN1161) could be thought of as forming an "ear" and the other (LDN1163) could be thought of as a small "eye" but perhaps the bigger round dark region next to this may be a more suitable candidate. I started on this target last fall and collected ~30 hours of data. I resumed this spring and got it to 60 hours across all three filters. Everything about this target has been difficult: the capturing was done with and without the moon present causing light gradients, and clouds were a constant presence (I've probably captured another 10 hours worth of very cloudy images). The framing was tricky since I had been capturing it upside down on the other side of the meridian last fall and then right side up this spring and I could never get the rotation angle exactly right between the two sets of frames manually either due to the curvature of the celestial sphere or the change in the position of the mount (which I had taken down for the winter). Fortunately every thing calibrated, registered, and stacked nicely in PixInsight. This is probably the most inconsistent dataset I've thrown at PixInsight which handled it beautifully. However, post processing then turned out to be a chore but fortunately this time the starless technique recommended by Stephen King produced some initial images that gave me hope and encouragement, which led me to learning and applying some of the most advanced processing skills I've ever used on this target. Finally, I was able to get something decent out of it that I now am happy to share with you all. The Lion Nebula (particularly the parts outside the "head") is very faint, which is why I spent so much time on this target, and I was trying hard to get the mesh-like body below the head and outer structures and filaments which shows up the most with the O3 filter on which I collected ~24 hours worth of data. Most of the images shown were processed by first creating an original LHOO/SHO image, removing the stars, light processing, and then putting the stars back at a reduced size. I'm torn between the choices (https://www.astrobin.com/g20c4j) but I've noticed that introducing colour sometimes causes a perceptual loss of detail/contrast (which is why I provide Ha only images for comparison). In this case, it's a very busy field, and the stars cause you to lose sight of how distinctively shaped this nebula is and also the surrounding fainter nebulosity which is most obvious in the starless images. Similarly, since the "head" region in the LHOO is single coloured, the detail continues to shine through. Nonetheless, when you cumulatively examine all the images, you can see how this nebula is deserving of its name! There are aspects (near the feet and even the flow of gases behind the head) that resemble a winged lion from various mythologies. Since I had nice data in each channel, I've posted both the original Ha and O3 master lights (A and B) in monochrome without the star removal or edge tightening processes so you can appreciate the crowded field of stars but also the distinct Lion shape (the S2 data is also pretty good). I've also included an original version of a LHOOS image (C; the S2 data is in the luminance channel) with star edges tightened, not removed and replaced, as well as reconstituted versions of two LHOOS and one SHO (D, E, and F) images with the same processing otherwise (the colours go from brighter to pastel). Finally, I've included a starless version of the nebula in SHO (G), as well as a fantastic LHOO version by Stephen King (H) which he did early on and kept me going whenever I got frustrated. In my view, C is not bad given its minimalist processing and achieving similar results, but it is not the most pleasing aesthetically.Tiếng Việt: Tinh vân B369 thuộc chòm sao Tiên Vương |
Date | |
Source | Own work |
Author | Ram samudrala |
Camera location | 43° 16′ 12″ N, 79° 01′ 12″ W | View this and other nearby images on: OpenStreetMap | 43.270000; -79.020000 |
---|
|
This image was selected as picture of the day on Vietnamese Wikipedia.
|
Total integration: 60.4 hours/3625 minutes (263x5m = ~22h for Ha 278x5m = ~23h for O3 184x5m = ~15h for S2).
Camera: QHY163M (16mp mono) CMOS cooled to -15 degrees C. Telescope: Takahashi FC100DF Steinheil fluorite doublet apochromat refractor @ f/4.9. Reducer: Takahashi FC-35 2". Mount: Paramount MyT. Filters: Astrodon 5nm Ha, 3nm O3, 3nm S2. Software: Sharpcap, PixInsight, Topaz Studio 2.
Also includes WR-153/GP Cephei and RW Cephei.
Licensing
edit- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
This file was uploaded as part of Wiki Science Competition 2023. |
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 08:57, 15 December 2023 | 4,292 × 3,312 (13.49 MB) | Ram samudrala (talk | contribs) | Uploaded own work with UploadWizard |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
The following 13 pages use this file:
- User:Alexmar983/sandbox
- User:Cmao20
- User talk:Cmao20
- User talk:Ram samudrala
- Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Lion nebula.jpg
- Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/January 2024
- Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy
- Commons:Featured pictures/chronological/2024-A
- Commons:Featured pictures/chronological/January 2024
- Commons:Wiki Science Competition 2023/Winners
- Commons:Wiki Science Competition 2023/Winners/Astronomy
- Commons:Wiki Science Competition 2023/Winners/Astronomy/round 2
- Commons:Wiki Science Competition 2023/Winners/United States
File usage on other wikis
The following other wikis use this file:
- Usage on en.wikipedia.org
- Usage on fr.wikipedia.org
- Usage on incubator.wikimedia.org
- Wn/bn/কৃত্রিম বুদ্ধিমত্তার সাহায্যে প্রোটিনের গঠন নির্ণয় করলেন বিজ্ঞানীরা
- Template:Wn/bn/বিজ্ঞান ও প্রযুক্তি
- Wn/bn/চন্দ্রযান-৩ অভিযানের বিক্রম ল্যান্ডার ও প্রজ্ঞান রোভারের সাথে সংযোগ বিচ্ছিন্ন
- Wn/bn/ওপেনএআই তাদের জিপিটি-৪ ওমনি ঘোষণা করেছে: মাল্টিমডাল কৃত্রিম বুদ্ধিমত্তার অগ্রগতি
- Wn/bn/স্পেসএক্স আটকে পড়া মহাকাশচারীদের ২০২৫ সালে ফিরিয়ে আনবে বলে ঘোষণা করেছে নাসা
- Usage on vi.wikipedia.org
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Width | 4,292 px |
---|---|
Height | 3,312 px |
Bits per component |
|
Compression scheme | Uncompressed |
Orientation | Normal |
Number of components | 3 |
Horizontal resolution | 72 dpi |
Vertical resolution | 72 dpi |
Data arrangement | chunky format |
Software used | PixInsight 1.8.9-1 / PCL 2.4.29 |