File:Rothalsbock Stictoleptura rubra female 1841.jpg
Original file (4,464 × 4,464 pixels, file size: 14.71 MB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Captions
Object location | 52° 41′ 58″ N, 10° 10′ 13″ E | View this and other nearby images on: OpenStreetMap | 52.699444; 10.170278 |
---|
Summary
editDescriptionRothalsbock Stictoleptura rubra female 1841.jpg |
Deutsch: Rothalsbock Stictoleptura rubra, female an stehender, toter Lärche Larix decidua im Landkreis Celle
Der abgebildete Käfer wurde am 17. Juli 2021 von Christoph auf kerbtier.de bestimmt, auf Grund meiner (Norbert) Anfrage dort vom 17. Juli 2021 |
||
Date | |||
Source | Own work | ||
Author | NobbiP | ||
Permission (Reusing this file) |
NobbiP, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publishes it under the following licenses:
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, 2.5 Generic, 2.0 Generic and 1.0 Generic license. Attribution: NobbiP
You may select the license of your choice. |
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 15:24, 19 July 2021 | 4,464 × 4,464 (14.71 MB) | NobbiP (talk | contribs) | {{Object location|52|41|58|N|10|10|13|E}} == {{int:filedesc}} == {{Information |Description={{de|Rothalsbock ''Stictoleptura rubra'', female an stehender, toter Lärche ''Larix decidua'' im Landkreis Celle}} Der abgebildete Käfer wurde am 17. Juli 2021 von Christoph auf [http://www.kerbtier.de kerbtier.de] bestimmt, auf Grund meiner (Norbert) Anfrage dort vom 17. Juli 2021 <br /> The beetle shown here has been identified from Christoph on [http://www.kerbtier.de kerbtier.de] 2021, July 17th,... |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
The following page uses this file:
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Camera manufacturer | Canon |
---|---|
Camera model | Canon EOS 90D |
Author | Nobbi |
Exposure time | 1/100 sec (0.01) |
F-number | f/8 |
ISO speed rating | 250 |
Date and time of data generation | 12:08, 17 July 2021 |
Lens focal length | 100 mm |
Orientation | Normal |
Horizontal resolution | 350 dpi |
Vertical resolution | 350 dpi |
Software used | Digital Photo Professional |
File change date and time | 12:08, 17 July 2021 |
Y and C positioning | Centered |
Exposure Program | Manual |
Exif version | 2.31 |
Date and time of digitizing | 12:08, 17 July 2021 |
Meaning of each component |
|
APEX shutter speed | 6.625 |
APEX aperture | 6 |
APEX exposure bias | 0 |
Metering mode | Spot |
Flash | Flash did not fire |
DateTime subseconds | 80 |
DateTimeOriginal subseconds | 80 |
DateTimeDigitized subseconds | 80 |
Supported Flashpix version | 1 |
Color space | sRGB |
Custom image processing | Normal process |
Exposure mode | Manual exposure |
White balance | Auto white balance |
Scene capture type | Standard |
GPS tag version | 0.0.3.2 |
Rating (out of 5) | 0 |