Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 05 2018

Consensual review

edit

File:Panther_Kallista_1,6-_P6280009.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Panther Kallista 1,6 at ADAC Deutschland Klassik 2018 --Ermell 07:30, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   OpposeFaces blurred without reasonable cause. --Peulle 07:47, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
  •   CommentI disagree.The names of the drivers are listed in a list of participants. It would be easy to identify the people through them. A permit would certainly be needed. The picture is only about the vehicle, the people are absolutely irrelevant.--Ermell 08:00, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
  •   CommentWhat is the problem with a possibility to identify them? they interact with the photographer in a positive way. Therefore agreement is given. anyway, the blurred faces are a loss in quality I think. Besides that: nice picture! --Sujalajus 10:03, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
    •   Done Blur removed.--Ermell 07:49, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support And then suddenly the image is perfectly fine.--Peulle 08:50, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Spurzem 17:54, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Peulle 07:12, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Ford_Model_T_Tourabout-_P6280014.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Ford Model T Tourabout at ADAC Deutschland Klassik 2018 --Ermell 07:30, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Oppose I can't accept the censoring of these people's faces; that's just not how Commons should work. They even appear to be smiling and waving at the photographer, so I see no reason for this. --Peulle 07:46, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
    I disagree. --Ermell 08:00, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
  •   Comment Please explain your reasoning for this. -- Ikan Kekek 08:08, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
  •   Comment The names of the drivers are listed in a list of participants. It would be easy to identify the people through them. A permit would certainly be needed. The picture is only about the vehicle, the people are absolutely irrelevant.--Ermell 08:11, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
  •   Comment It's interesting how I agree with absolutely no part of that statement. Anyway, as the image has now been fixed, I am changing to   Support--Peulle 08:49, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
  •   Comment A permit from whom? If the problem is with the people themselves possibly suing, do you really think that's likely? Or is the problem something else? -- Ikan Kekek 14:29, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support -- Spurzem 17:56, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Sharpness could be better, but it's acceptable. BTW and IMO: You need no explicit permission. They are waving, that's a kind of permission. If you like, you can set {{Personality rights}}, but it is not necessary. They Creative Commons licence give the right of using of the photographer, not of third party rights. --XRay 05:29, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
    •   Comment Thanks for your info @XRay: . I was not sure about that.--Ermell 07:30, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Peulle 07:11, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Sailing_on_Lake_Constance_(1X7A0004).jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Sailing on Lake Constance --MB-one 19:08, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Crop could be tighter but good quality. --Ermell 22:13, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
  •   Oppose:I disagree: Crop should be tighter! the depth of the lake would also be visible without so much water in front of the object --Sujalajus 10:06, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support - Quality is quite good IMO and well-composed. -- Ikan Kekek 06:38, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Peulle 07:11, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

File:AERO_Friedrichshafen_2018,_Friedrichshafen_(1X7A4544).jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Inflatable structure for advertising at AERO Friedrichshafen 2018 --MB-one 16:09, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion   Question Is this really a fuel tank or is it only an ad for the company? --Basotxerri 19:10, 26 August 2018 (UTC).
  •   Support Good quality, I think it is an advertising. --GT1976 19:30, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
    Well, according to that category and the description this is a fuel tank. Please correct if it's not. --Basotxerri 20:11, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
    I don't know with 100% certainty that this one is indeed a tank. But collapsible aviation fuel tanks for temporary on-site storage do exist. Unfortunately, due to my lack of knowledge of the polish language, I couldn't verify, if this company produces tanks like this. --MB-one 20:15, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
    We need to be sure about the subject before accepting it. --Yann 09:19, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
    Changed the description. --MB-one 08:33, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support OK then. Yann 09:19, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
  •   Support Thank you Yann, that was because I mentioned it. GQ. --Basotxerri 10:07, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Peulle 07:10, 4 September 2018 (UTC)