Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 08 2020

• 
  • Nomination View from Grüntalkogel to north east, Austria. --GT1976 04:08, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:12, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from Bichlberg to Ober-Brandgraben, Kirchberg an der Pielach, Austria. --GT1976 04:05, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:12, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fingerposts at Yetisteig, Texingtal, Austria. --GT1976 03:58, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:09, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fingerposts at Yetisteig, Texingtal, Austria. --GT1976 03:57, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:09, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from Bichlberg to south east, Kirchberg an der Pielach, Austria. --GT1976 03:55, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:13, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Apartment building on Auf der Werzer Leitn #1 in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 03:55, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of Fronweg in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 03:55, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gravestones of family Kröll at the farmhouse «vulgo Ostermann» on Brockweg in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 03:56, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of Fronweg in Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 03:56, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sunset at Nadap Lookout, Kakadu National Park, Northern Territory, Australia --XRay 01:07, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 03:50, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rock art at Ubirr in Kakadu National Park, Northern Territory, Australia --XRay 01:07, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 03:50, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kakadu National Park, Northern Territory, Australia --XRay 01:07, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:53, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Marina Bay Street Circuit, Singapore --XRay 01:07, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:53, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Alfa Romeo Montreal headlamps at Techno-Classica 2018, Essen --MB-one 20:49, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality - schöne Detailaufnahme -- Spurzem 21:14, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Melancholy thistle (Cirsium heterophyllum) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 19:57, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:53, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination habitaciónEu, como posuidor dos dereitos de autor desta obra, pola presente publícoa baixo a seguinte licenza:. By User:Porto de Rinlo --Beninho 19:44, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 19:54, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:53, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Older men on a street of Pushkar --Jakubhal 17:49, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality for me --PantheraLeo1359531 18:54, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Northern plains gray langur (Semnopithecus entellus) in Pushkar --Jakubhal 17:24, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 21:21, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Northern plains gray langur (Semnopithecus entellus) in Pushkar --Jakubhal 17:24, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 21:19, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Traffic in Anawrahta road, Yangon. --Kallerna 17:22, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:54, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination ASICS Gel-Pulse 11 --PetarM 16:55, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:53, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 01.jpg Auferstehungskirche Agenbach, zugleich Aussegnungshalle in Neuweiler-Agenbach, Kreis Calw. --Giftzwerg 88 15:21, 5. Mär. 2020 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn
    Please correct the perspective and remove the CA --Ermell 15:42, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
     Comment Unfortunately there is no RAW version of this picture. I am learning to use the software for picture processing, but I do not feel comfortable enough to do this. I am afraid to ruin the picture instead of fixing the issues. So I do retract the nomination. --Giftzwerg 88 21:14, 6. Mär. 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Germany, Lösnich, Hohlweg 1 --Berthold Werner 14:46, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:43, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Site of the excavated ruins of the Minoan palace at Malia, Crete, Greece. --Cayambe 14:09, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:45, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination European herring gull (Larus argentatus), Svolvær, Lofoten, Norway --Poco a poco 13:11, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:44, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination European herring gull (Larus argentatus), Svolvær, Lofoten, Norway --Poco a poco 13:11, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality, hypnotizing view :) --PantheraLeo1359531 18:52, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination European herring gull (Larus argentatus), Svolvær, Lofoten, Norway --Poco a poco 13:11, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:43, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Crystals (mainly sugar) in a dried Coca Cola drop under a microscope. Polarization. Crossed polarizers. Already a FP here. By User:Lucasbosch --Junior Jumper 11:46, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --IM3847 16:01, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bench by the Drammen river during the flood of February 2020.--Peulle 10:15, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
    Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 11:11, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion {{{2}}}
• 
  • Nomination The Drammen river during the flood of February 2020.--Peulle 10:15, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Cayambe 14:10, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination CNG-Bus Volvo 7700 G in Berne, Switzerland. --JoachimKohler-HB 10:11, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality, nice composition. --Axel Tschentscher 12:26, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Milk tanker Volvo FM 410 at the ferry terminal in Nes (Ameland) --JoachimKohler-HB 10:11, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion OK... although that right crop is veeeery tight. --Peulle 10:16, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Texture of a red bean species grown in Benin --Adoscam 09:57, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:49, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Statue dorée d'Abou el Kacem Chebbi à Tozeur, Tunisie--Tsaag Valren 08:47, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Insufficient quality. --Junior Jumper 08:57, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination  Columnar basalt after sunset at Cape Stolbchaty, Kunashir Island, Kurils Nature Reserve, Russia. By User:SKas --Junior Jumper 08:40, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 10:09, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Domesticated duck on the banks of lake Voulismeni at Agios Nikolaos in Crete. --Cayambe 08:34, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 13:45, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Domesticated duck in Cretae. --Cayambe 08:34, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 13:45, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination On the northern slope of Mount Ruapehu in Tongariro NP, New Zealand. --Tournasol7 07:29, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Junior Jumper 11:40, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Statue-menhir de Lacoste in commune of Broquies, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 07:29, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:36, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Junior Jumper 11:40, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Silhöfer Straße in Wetzlar, Hesse, Germany. --Tournasol7 07:29, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:36, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dominican monastery in Eisenach, Thuringia, Germany. --Tournasol7 07:29, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:36, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Langweerderwielen-Langwarder Wielen. Shore reed breaks the waves.
    --Famberhorst 07:21, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality, but ik zie alleen geen hagel en natte sneeuw --Michielverbeek 07:28, 5 March 2020 (UTC)Opmerking: Tussen de buien door zijn de foto's gemaakt.--Famberhorst 17:00, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Junior Jumper 11:40, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Inconspicuous white scented little flowers of the Sarcococca Hookeriana
    --Famberhorst 07:21, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:32, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Junior Jumper 11:40, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pig in a pigsty in the open-air Museum Oberpfalz in Neusath --Ermell 07:20, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:32, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wayside chapel in the Mühlental in the open-air museum Oberpfalz in Neusath --Ermell 07:20, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:32, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fountain at the entrance of the open-air museum Oberpfalz in Neusath --Ermell 07:20, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:44, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tiled stove in the apartment of the Rauberweihermühle in the Open Air Museum Upper Palatinate in Neusath --Ermell 07:20, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:24, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Replica of a Renaissance oven of the Fischer pottery in Sulzbach exhibited in the apartment of the Rauberweihermühle in the Open Air Museum Upper Palatinate in Neusath --Ermell 07:20, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 07:38, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination St. Gallen: timber framed house Gallusstrasse 29 --JoachimKohler-HB 07:15, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:18, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ebnat-Kappel, canton of St. Gall: Wooden house at Thuraustrasse, more than 100 years old --JoachimKohler-HB 07:09, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:45, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination River Thur in Nesslau-Krummenau with the Churfirsten mountains in the background --JoachimKohler-HB 07:09, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:43, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Walk through the Hollandse Hout Sand extraction in the nature reserve.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:48, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:04, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Walk through the Hollandse Hout Swans in the water feature of the nature reserve.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:48, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 06:02, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Junior Jumper 11:40, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Plaque at High Street Bridge in Blenheim --Podzemnik 05:40, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:06, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Taylor River, Blenheim --Podzemnik 05:40, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:06, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Blenheim Baptist Church --Podzemnik 05:40, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:44, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Blenheim Baptist Church --Podzemnik 05:40, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 06:02, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Blenheim Baptist Church --Podzemnik 05:40, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:46, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from Bichlberg to north west, Kirchberg an der Pielach, Austria. --GT1976 05:33, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:05, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from Bichlberg to south east, Kirchberg an der Pielach, Austria. --GT1976 05:32, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:05, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Yetisteig, Texingtal, Austria. --GT1976 05:32, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
    Good quality. --XRay 06:02, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion {{{2}}}
• 
  • Nomination Fingerposts at Yetisteig, Texingtal, Austria. --GT1976 05:31, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:40, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Meadow at Bichlberg, Kirchberg an der Pielach, Austria. --GT1976 05:30, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:43, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Panoramic view from Magdalensberg to the Karawanks and the Klagenfurt Basin, Carinthia, Austria --Uoaei1 05:02, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:09, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Quebec city --Wilfredor 01:05, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Cayambe 14:13, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination São Paulo MetroI --Wilfredor 01:05, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:48, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Terrasse du Chevalier-de-Lévisl --Wilfredor 01:05, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Cayambe 08:33, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Minoan Palace at Malia, Crete, Greece. --Cayambe 16:42, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. I am not sure about the white balance – the sky looks a bit too purple; maybe you can try to reduce that. --Aristeas 07:58, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Domesticated ducks at Agios Nikolaos, Crete. --Cayambe 16:40, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:23, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Paddy crop near Eluru in West Godavari. --IM3847 16:30, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 07:54, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sunrise on paddy fields near Eluru, Andhra Pradesh. --IM3847 16:30, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 07:54, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Germany, Lösnich, Hauptstr. 38 --Berthold Werner 15:14, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion GQ --Palauenc05 21:36, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Monumento a los Pueblos Indígenas, Santiago, Región Metropolitana, Chile --Carlos yo 14:08, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality but it needs a perspecitve correction (building in background is not straight) --Michielverbeek 20:17, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
     Support To me it looks straight. Good quality. --Palauenc05 21:39, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Porte du Théron in Marvejols, Lozère, France. --Tournasol7 07:43, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:12, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Anacapa Island Lighthouse Steevven1 21:53, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --T.Bednarz 16:42, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Audax Italiano v Colo-Colo, Estadio Nacional, Ñuñoa, Santiago, Región Metropolitana, Chile --Carlos yo 20:53, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 11:01, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Feeding turtles in front of the shrine of Bayazid Bostami in Chittagong - a turtle accepting food is supposed to be a sign of good luck --Kritzolina 15:38, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Review
    The food is overexposed/burnt and also some part s of the turtle, can you fix that? --Poco a poco 19:40, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Trees with prayer ribbons behind Bayazid Bostami Mazar in Chittagong --Kritzolina 15:38, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Review
    Strong CA, lack of perspective correction, burnt sky, fixable though I believe --Poco a poco 19:40, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Geoboard at Maker Faire Berlin 2018, FEZ Wuhlheide --MB-one 09:37, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Bicycle at OutDoor 2018 --MB-one 09:37, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: BMW M5, IAA 2017 --MB-one 09:37, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Aft engine and tail of a Bombardier Learjet 75 at EBACE 2019, Palexpo, Switzerland --MB-one 09:37, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Forteresse de Salses, Pyrénées-Orientales, France. --Tournasol7 07:41, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn
    Strong purple hue, looks unreal, furthermore there is a sharpening halo on the right around the tower --Poco a poco 14:08, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
    So I withdraw this image, Tournasol7 07:50, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Thistle broomrape (Orobanche reticulata) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 16:54, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn  Comment Technically, this picture is perfectly OK, I think. But the reason why it has been standing here so long without review might be that other reviewers felt uneasy with the subject standing out so weakly against its background. That's a composition problem. But this problem is strong enough that I refrain also from promotion. I think the subject should stand out clearer for QI. --Johannes Robalotoff 10:32, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
     Comment Thanks. I withdraw my nomination. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:00, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Finnish MEP and orthodox priest Mitro Repo. --Pigsonthewing 11:22, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
    There's a dustpot just above the head on the left --MB-one 10:39, 26 February 2020 (UTC)  Not done in over a week.--Peulle 10:18, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:Bison_and_Prairie_Dog_in_Wind_Cave_National_Park.jpg

• Nomination Bison and Prairie Dog in Wind Cave National Park Steevven1 03:58, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. Not easy to decide. The eyes are looking at the bison first, but it isn't the main subject. --XRay 04:29, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Purple halo all around the bison and many strange dark spots plus some dark areas near the bison's head that seem like stray paintbrush marks. -- Ikan Kekek 08:30, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

•  Neutral Sorry, you're right. Switched to neutral and waiting. --XRay 06:17, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
• I'd a look to the spots again. IMO these are unsharp flies, not dust spots. So it's a natural reason. --XRay 12:04, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

• That explains the spots but not the blotches. -- Ikan Kekek 07:03, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose - also out of focus Seven Pandas 21:14, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 12:53, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Kakadu_(AU),_Kakadu_National_Park,_Yellow_Water_--_2019_--_3953.jpg

• Nomination Ngurrungurrudjba (Yellow Water) in Kakadu National Park, Northern Territory, Australia --XRay 04:19, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --GT1976 04:24, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
  

• The crop is very random. Also, the description is not adequate. --Kallerna 05:54, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

•  Done The description is improved, thank you. IMO the crop is OK. --XRay 06:27, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 08:10, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 11:31, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Pörtschach_Goritschach_St.-Oswalder_Straße_Aufgang_zur_Filialkirche_05012020_7886.jpg

• Nomination Staircase of the forest track to the subsidiary church Saint Oswald in Goritschach, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:56, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
• Promotion
   Support Good quality. --XRay 04:20, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
  I want to discuss about this. Quality images are about the technical quality - sure. But still, I think the composition and subject should be at least somehow tolerable. What do you think? --Kallerna 05:51, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
   Support - I agree, but I find the composition more than acceptable and actually pretty good. -- Ikan Kekek 08:46, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Seven Pandas 21:53, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 11:31, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Tuning_World_Bodensee_2018,_Friedrichshafen_(OW1A0159).jpg

• Nomination Covered car at Tuning World Bodensee 2018 --MB-one 10:06, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
• Promotion
   Oppose Insufficient quality. Foreground distracting --Wilfredor 19:02, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
  Improved the foreground --MB-one 11:09, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
   Support Good quality. Much better --Wilfredor 21:20, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
   Support - Good quality, IMO. Wilfredor, you need to cross out the vote you don't want to count. -- Ikan Kekek 06:27, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

 Done thanks --Wilfredor 01:06, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 11:32, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Slightly_business_casual_Informal_wear_-_possible_look_underneath_-_pose_2.jpg

• Nomination Slightly business casual Informal wear. Possible look underneath. Pose 2 --Tobias ToMar Maier 00:05, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Comment I think the description (and possibly the title) is a bit off; better would be something like "Underwear model". --Peulle 21:03, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose  Not done within a week. --XRay 10:09, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

• No longer useful contra vote. --XRay 06:29, 3 March 2020 (UTC) Comment

• I think the two of you missed something obvious. I'v added other version to the file summary. Including one that XRay voted on positive. --Tobias ToMar Maier 04:01, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
• @Tobias ToMar Maier: If you fix issues, please signal this with the template {{Done}} and a comment. And if there is an unfixed issue without any comment it will be closed after a week. --XRay 06:19, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Support - Good quality. Everything seems OK to me, and the photo is good. Maybe I missed something. -- Ikan Kekek 06:29, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose No. I still think the file name and description need reworking.--Peulle (talk) 12:44, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

 Comment Well than make a suggestion. Please.--Tobias ToMar Maier (talk)

• I did. Look at the very first line in the discussion above. :) If you want, I can make other suggestions, such as "Female underwear model", "Female model with Calvin Klein underwear" or similar. The possibilities are many. --Peulle (talk) 11:13, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

•  Support --Cvmontuy 07:02, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Look good to me --Wilfredor 01:07, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 11:32, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Le_Costa_Mediterranea_dans_la_rade_de_Port_Louis_(Maurice)_le_29_février_2020_(2).jpg

• Nomination Le Costa Mediterranea dans la rade de Port Louis (Maurice) le 29 février 2020. Il devrait rester quelques jours après avoir été refoulé des Seychelles dans le contexte du coronavirus. --Benoît Prieur 21:54, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
• Decline

Description problem is fixed now. --Benoît Prieur 12:01, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality -- Spurzem 23:03, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Description should be fixed. The images depicts the Costa Mediterranea, not the World Odyssee. --MB-one 09:24, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose The main subject is too small. We do not need two almost identical QI's. --Kallerna 06:33, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

• QI isn't VI or FP. So similar photographs are possible. (In this case the photograph is improvable, too much water. The main subject is the harbour. So there are issues at title and description too.) --XRay 08:20, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment Nearly half of the water should cropped out. --XRay 17:19, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, but the crop should be done. And IMO sharpness is at a low level. --XRay 17:54, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 11:33, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

File:20191218_Amber_Fort_seen_from_Jaigarh_Fort_1617_9427.jpg

• Nomination Amber Fort seen from Jaigarh Fort --Jakubhal 15:14, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
• Promotion
   Oppose Insufficient quality. Out of focus --Wilfredor 19:01, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
  Thank you, but I disagree. --Jakubhal 19:48, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
   Support - Not pinpoint sharp but IMO acceptable, and it was clearly a hazy day. -- Ikan Kekek 03:23, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
   Support per Ikan. --Aristeas 09:12, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Support There seems a bit fog in the air but the image is not out of focus. -- Spurzem 13:37, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Needs perspective correction and some ccw rotation. --Smial 21:27, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose The subject is the fort but eyes are drawn to the base of the hills. The fort is unsharp. Seven Pandas 03:03, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
•  mild support as the haze is clearly contributing to the lack of crispness. The fort does seem to be in focus; I can see individual holes in the facade. It's borderline, so I understand the opposers, but images with similar level of sharpness have been passed quite recently.--Peulle 13:27, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 11:33, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Kersbach_Kirche_Madonna-20200216-RM-163323.jpg

• Nomination Statue in the catholic parish church St. Johannes Baptist and St. Ottilie in Kersbach near Forchheim --Ermell 07:15, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
• Promotion
   Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:47, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
  

 Oppose Sorry, I think the contrast should be enhanced. The image seems to be too dark, the supposedly white wall shows as a rather dark shade of gray. --Till.niermann 13:36, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

 Oppose Yes, contrast should be enhanced. And a perspective correction is needed! (I cannot know how the walls are in that building. But I am sure that the candles are not that distorted and slanted in reality. The slant is consistent with the slanted lines on the wall, ergo the wall and the statue must suffer from perspective distortion too.) --Johannes Robalotoff 10:41, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

•  Done Nothing is really vertical but I gave it a try.--Ermell 10:33, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

•  Support - Good quality to my eyes, and all those eyes in the picture are really interesting and unusual. -- Ikan Kekek 02:45, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Good now. --Aristeas 17:10, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 12:52, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Templo_Phra_Ram,_Ayutthaya,_Tailandia,_2013-08-23,_DD_03.jpg

• Nomination Phra Ram temple, Ayutthaya, Thailand --Poco a poco 11:03, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 14:22, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose Looks sort of grey like there is no contrast --Podzemnik 18:35, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support - Seems OK to me. I've experienced days like that in Southeast Asia. -- Ikan Kekek 05:11, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Agree with Podzemnik. All days are not perfect for photography. --Kallerna 19:59, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment The shadows were to bright, indeed. I've uploaded a new version Poco a poco 10:06, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment - Looks too dark for 12:47. I'll change my vote to opposing unless you can give us a good explanation of how it was that dark at midday, when you previously showed a very different kind of light. And in order to pass QI isn't a good reason. -- Ikan Kekek 11:40, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

• Not sure, Ikan Kekek, I think that the weather was not really good with casted skies, to me it doesn't really look unrealistic, also at noon, with very cloudy weather. Poco a poco 19:53, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

•  Question - OK, but was it dark rainy weather or actually more like this? -- Ikan Kekek 02:47, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment - I've crossed out my supporting vote while awaiting your explanation. -- Ikan Kekek 03:28, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

•  Support Sharp enough, big enough, exposure ok, noise level ok, no perspective issues. The weather is not a quality criterion, I think. To me the picture looks quite natural and not too much processed. --Smial 00:36, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Support per Smial.--Ermell 16:08, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 12:49, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

File:20191204_Czerwony_Fort_w_Agrze_0935_6596.jpg

• Nomination: Moti Masjid, Agra Fort --Jakubhal 12:58, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
• Review
   Oppose Insufficient quality. On seccond plane a bit of motion blur maybe because camera snaking --Wilfredor 19:08, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
   Support I don't see motion blur. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 21:39, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
  Weak  Support The sharpness of the buildings deteriorates near the left and the right border (therefore “weak” support; maybe the lens has some field curvature?), but I can’t find motion blur, and overall good. --Aristeas 10:16, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose - I think the top of the gate and the three white minars rising above it are too blurry. It doesn't have to be motion blur to be blur. -- Ikan Kekek 06:47, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose I see the same thing as Ikan. Pity, because it's quite a nice shot.--Peulle 13:23, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Support OK 4 me. --Palauenc05 21:45, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Peulle 11:34, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Torre_de_pemex_desde_MR_2020p2.jpg

• Nomination: Pemex Tower in Mexico City --Cvmontuy 14:18, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
• Review
  
•  Oppose Insufficient quality. Lack of Deep of field --Wilfredor 19:05, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
  
•  Comment I disagree the subject is the Pemex Tower and is in focus --Cvmontuy 19:23, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support per Cvmontuy.--Ermell 09:26, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Was this shot through a glass window? There are what look like internal reflections over parts of the image.--Bobulous 21:00, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Peulle 11:34, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Ladiko_beach._Rhodes,_Greece.jpg

• Nomination Ladiko beach. Rhodes, Greece --Ввласенко 18:46, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose Insufficient quality. Strong noise --Wilfredor 00:55, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support I can spot only minor noise in the sky (this could/should be improved), else the photo seems OK. --Aristeas 07:06, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Done I reduced the noise in the sky--Ввласенко 08:13, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment Thank you! --Aristeas 08:46, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment it´s leaning to the right IMO--Ermell 09:23, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment This impression created by bending of the coastline. On the right is a narrow exit from the bay. -- Ввласенко (talk) 17:23, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
•  Support not so bad.--Ermell 16:11, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 12:47, 7 March 2020 (UTC)