Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 14 2024

Consensual review

edit

File:Peloton_of_Tour_Féminin_International_des_Pyrénées_2024_during_stage_2.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Peloton of Tour Féminin International des Pyrénées 2024 during stage 2 --Shougissime 15:31, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 16:48, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose crop at bottom --Charlesjsharp 08:03, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Comment The aim is to show the heart of the peloton and imagine the continuity of this one at the bottom and at the top of the picture. The main subject is the girls who are smilling and the yellow jersey who is the leader of the race. --Shougissime 20:29, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Support. Very good image: good composition, good colors and good sharpness. Nice to see the girls smiling. -- Spurzem 12:29, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Support Very good technical quality, minor composition flaw, aka: good enough. --Smial 14:12, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Weak oppose Technically good. But the crop at the bottom is not good. The fact that there is one leading cyclist gives some importance to this person. This makes it hard to accept the cut off there. --Augustgeyler 18:49, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per others, the crop. --Sebring12Hrs 20:14, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Comment. When I look at the arguments for contra, I can only shake my head. Just look at everything else you are praising. -- Spurzem 21:32, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Weak support Indeed the bottom crop is a flaw, but still it is good enough IMO. --Plozessor 04:39, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Promoted   --Plozessor 04:39, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Buger_Brücke_Hochwasser-20110109-RM-145505.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Buger Bridge at high water --Ermell 04:21, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Comment Level of detail is borderline here. --Augustgeyler 12:12, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 12:47, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I think it is too soft. There is not much detail at the trees. --Augustgeyler 19:32, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Comment Yes, but the main motive is probably the flood --Georgfotoart 11:14, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Support This is soft by soft lighting. And that is unavoidable in such Schietwetter. You can't wait until the sun shines and creates beautiful contrasts, which then look sharper. By then, the flood may have already disappeared. --Smial 12:26, 11 July 2024 (UTC) Ps: However, a more detailed description of the picture would be useful, e.g. the name of the river and which bank is shown.
  •   Support Per Smial. --Plozessor 04:37, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Plozessor 04:37, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Mechelen_OLV_over_de_Dijle_hoogaltaar_detail_3.png

edit

 

  • Nomination: Detail of the High Altar of the Church of Our Lady across the river Dijle --ReneeWrites 21:24, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
  •   Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:03, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Too soft and lacking detail. --Augustgeyler 09:32, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Info Blue reflection (change image section? and sharpen) --Georgfotoart 10:58, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Augustgeyler 07:21, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Djerba_harbor.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination a unique shot of the last part of Djerba harbor while sailingI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2024. --Bill.pix 15:19, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 17:04, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose It looks nice but can not be QI. The image is   Overprocessed. Colour contrast and shadows are edited unrealistically. --Augustgeyler 19:50, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Weak oppose Especially the rocks are not looking natural. --Plozessor 09:14, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose   Overprocessed.--Tournasol7 19:52, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Temp   Support.   Question Perhaps the color saturation is a tad too high, but couldn't the green on the boulders also come from algae? The sky, clouds and water surface look natural to me. Ok, the green on the pillar is a mystery to me too. -- Smial 11:17, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Beautiful picture but those colors don't look natural. ReneeWrites 22:52, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose →   Declined   --Augustgeyler 10:03, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

File:2024_Toyota_ProAce_City_IMG_9398.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination: Toyota ProAce City Facelift in Leonberg --Alexander-93 15:09, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
  •   Support Good quality (assuming the ground is sloped). --MB-one 12:17, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose blown out highlights at the front of the car. --Augustgeyler 19:50, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Augustgeyler 07:19, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Tribulus_terrestris_-_Dghoumes_National_Park.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Tribulus terrestris captured in Dghoumes National ParkI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth 2024. --Bill.pix 12:54, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 10:50, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Not sharp on the sides --Екатерина Борисова 03:24, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Support While the utmost right part of the plant looks slightly out of focus at full resolution (which is about 18 Megapixels!), the photo is really good enough IMO. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:34, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Support Per Robert Flogaus-Faust ReneeWrites 22:46, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Augustgeyler 08:23, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Fern_Rock_Mallalli_Hassan_Jun24_A7CR_01573.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination: Small fern (2–3 in (5.1–7.6 cm)) and moss on rock, Mallalli Falls, Hassan, Karnataka, India --Tagooty 00:57, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
  •   Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 01:11, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose ID of the plants insufficient. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:50, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
    @Robert Flogaus-Faust: If anyone could help ID the fern, would be much appreciated. This is beyond my limited knowledge of ferns. --Tagooty 16:29, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
    @Tagooty: and @Robert Flogaus-Faust: Maybe it could help you...ː Lygodium --Terragio67 15:06, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Augustgeyler 07:39, 6 July 2024 (UTC)