Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 22 2024

Consensual review

edit

File:Island,_Hong_Kong_(20130807-DSC04174).jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination View of Hong Kong Island from Tsim Sha Tsui --MB-one 13:28, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Oppose Underexposed and nothing is really sharp in this picture. I'm not sure about the WB either (looks very blueish to me). Sorry --Benjism89 18:45, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
  Done fixed WB and sharpened a bit --MB-one 20:56, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
  Comment Still not OK IMO, and I'm afraid the WB has gone worse (now it's very yellow) --Benjism89 08:18, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose WB is better now, but overall too soft and not sharp enough. --Milseburg 14:02, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
  •   Support IMO it is sharp and detailed enough in its native resolution (which is the camera's full resolution). However, @MB-one description seems wrong - per EXIF it's from 2013 but the description says 2020. --Plozessor 17:43, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
  •   Weak oppose Sorry, but WB correcting of original image was too strong and the picture now is too yellow (it's depence also of monitor settings, but in any case too yellow). If the color balance will slightly shifted towards blue, it would be much better. Also, maybe buildings seem low contrast (as if overexposed) now, but that's IMHO. As for sharpness and detail - I think everything is ok. Vsatinet 18:32, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose →   Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 22:28, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

File:Ponte_di_Rialto_Venice_2.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Ponte di Rialto, Venice. --Kallerna 17:56, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 20:07, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose What about PC? Verticals on the left side are tilted.--Milseburg 14:28, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Per Milseburg, the perspective doesn't make sense. --Plozessor 15:49, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
  •   Comment PC fixed. --Kallerna 09:49, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
  •   Support Ok and QI for me now. --Milseburg 13:53, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
  •   Support Ok now. --Plozessor 17:44, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose →   Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 22:30, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

File:Zadar_(HR),_Meerenge_von_Maslenica_--_2022_--_0024.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Maslenica strait in Croatia --A. Öztas 00:29, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:10, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Unsharped. --Rbrechko 13:33, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
  • I uploaded a new version --A. Öztas 15:45, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
  •   Support Ok to me. --Sebring12Hrs 12:22, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
  Comment Very good compo, but not very sharp indeed at full size on a computer. --Sebring12Hrs 00:51, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
  •   Support IMO sharp enough, given the high DoF. --Plozessor 05:39, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
  •   Support Nice lighting and composition, by far sharp enough for an A4 size print. --Smial 11:50, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Milseburg 12:35, 21 December 2024 (UTC)