Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 30 2020
-
- Nomination Church of St. Nicholas, Marjan hill, Split, Croatia --Bgag 03:43, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:46, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Belfry of the church of St. Nicholas, Marjan hill, Split, Croatia --Bgag 03:43, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:52, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cross on Marjan hill, Split, Croatia --Bgag 03:43, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:52, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Blossom of cherry trees in Schulstrasse, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:41, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:48, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sculpture “Silberne Frequenz” (Otto Piene, 1970/71, 2012/14 redesign) at the LWL museum, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:41, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:48, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Reed grass at the fish ponds in the Börnste hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:41, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:48, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cherry blossom on Breite Strasse in Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:41, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:50, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sterntor in Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:41, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:50, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Farm building in Lorenziberg, Frauenstein, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:03, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 03:43, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Subsidiary church Saint Lawrence in Lorenziberg, Frauenstein, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:03, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 03:43, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Guest house in Lorenziberg #1, Frauenstein, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:03, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 03:43, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fingerpost to Gauerstall in Lorenziberg, Frauenstein, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:03, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 03:44, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Moosbedeckte Felsformation am Gauerstall in Nussberg, Frauenstein, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:03, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 03:44, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Aoraki, Aoraki - Mount Cook National Park --Podzemnik 03:02, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:45, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Abutilon × hybridum cultivar --Frank Schulenburg 02:53, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 03:45, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Detail of historical building Saarstr. 131 in Trier (Germany). --Palauenc05 20:44, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Dnalor 01 22:41, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Coltsfoot (Tussilago farfara) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:01, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 00:17, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Oosterbeek-NL, church: the Oude Kerk --Michielverbeek 19:58, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:28, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Doorwerth-NL, nature near castle Doorwerth --Michielverbeek 19:58, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:39, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Barneveld-NL, castle: the Schaffelaar --Michielverbeek 19:58, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:30, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kootwijk-NL, reformed church --Michielverbeek 19:58, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:41, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination between Hoog Buurlo and Hoenderloo-NL, tree with heath at the Veluwe --Michielverbeek 19:58, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 00:19, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Blue stoneware pot Spurzem 17:01, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:46, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Scania T-143E --JoachimKohler-HB 15:45, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good -- Spurzem 16:15, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Commemorative Memorial to the 1813 – 1815 Wars of Liberation from the napolenoic occupation of several German states by User:Alta Falisa --193.171.152.103 15:24, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Fischer.H 17:25, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bashundhara City Shopping Complex roof art at Dhaka, Bangladesh -- Wiki Ruhan 14:03, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --D-Kuru 16:10, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Illumination from Turkey for Sell -- Wiki Ruhan 13:50, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Decline Very colourful, but the lights seem too blurred at 100% --D-Kuru 16:10, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Alabaster coast northeast of Fécamp, Normandy, France --Milseburg 13:44, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 15:45, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rescue ship, Kiel, Germany --Poco a poco 13:11, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 17:23, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rescue boat, Svolvær, Lofoten, Norway --Poco a poco 13:11, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 15:45, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Costa Pacifica vessel, Geiranger, Norway --Poco a poco 13:11, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good for me --PantheraLeo1359531 14:51, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A manhole cover in Hof. --PantheraLeo1359531 12:06, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 12:20, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Volkswagen ID. Buggy at Geneva International Motor Show 2019, Le Grand-Saconnex --MB-one 09:38, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 11:18, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Crane in Colmar (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 07:45, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 12:30, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Historical building Saarstr. 45 in Trier (Germany). --Palauenc05 07:35, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 08:12, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fontana Pretoria,detail --GattoCeliaco 07:24, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
null --MB-one 09:45, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Oppose strong posterization --MB-one 09:45, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fontana Pretoria,detail --GattoCeliaco 07:24, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Decline Posterization - I guess the iPhone 5s was not able to get a QI shot in this light. --Peulle 11:46, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Panoramic view of La Couvertoirade, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 06:48, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 00:20, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stone cross in Albinhac, commune of Brommat, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 06:48, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion GQ --Palauenc05 07:36, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of Castro Laboreiro in municipality of Melgaço, Minho, Portugal. --Tournasol7 06:48, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:48, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Portal of the building at 13 rue Ménans in Gy, Haute-Saône, France. --Tournasol7 06:48, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Sonya7iv 07:24, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Portal of the building at 1 Place Adrien Rozier in Rodez, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 06:48, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:24, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Observation tower “Johannesturm” on the Hüls Hill in Krefeld --Carschten 06:46, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:59, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Detail of the “Johannesturm” on the Hüls Hill in Krefeld --Carschten 06:46, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:59, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Heusgen Villa in Krefeld --Carschten 06:46, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:59, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Igreja de Nossa Senhora do Livramento, Curral das Freiras, Madeira --Llez 06:33, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:59, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Wayside shrine in Wolski Forest, Kraków --Jakubhal 05:51, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:59, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hindu sadhu on a street of Udaipur --Jakubhal 05:51, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --RockyMasum 05:58, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Zirkus Morsa in the show "La Fin Demain" at 32. ULICA – The International Festival of Street Theatres in Kraków --Jakubhal 05:51, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Insufficient quality. Not sharp enough. --RockyMasum 08:55, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Steffensen's Buildings - top of the facade, Motueka --Podzemnik 05:32, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --RockyMasum 05:57, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Motueka Museum, Motueka --Podzemnik 05:32, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --RockyMasum 05:57, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Motueka Memorial Hall, Motueka --Podzemnik 05:32, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --RockyMasum 05:55, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A light on Motueka Memorial Hall, Motueka --Podzemnik 05:32, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --RockyMasum 05:55, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Used concrete slabs next to the Aldewei Boornzwaag (municipality of De Fryske Marren) are waiting for reuse.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:32, 27 April 2020 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 05:57, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Nomination Used concrete slabs next to the Aldewei Boornzwaag (municipality of De Fryske Marren) are waiting for reuse.
-
- Nomination Radio mast on the A7 next to Aldewei Boornzwaag, municipality of De Fryske Marren, province of Friesland.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:32, 27 April 2020 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 05:57, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Nomination Radio mast on the A7 next to Aldewei Boornzwaag, municipality of De Fryske Marren, province of Friesland.
-
- Nomination A lime green generic medicine pill shot on a white background --Subhrajyoti07 18:42, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
- Decline Very tight crop, barely surface details visible, insufficient categorization, sorry --PantheraLeo1359531 12:50, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A generic oval shaped medicine pill --Subhrajyoti07 18:33, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose not enough sharp, dust sports on background --Ezarate 13:16, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination "Défense d'afficher" sign (Posting is prohibited) on Commandant-Jean-Duhail Street in Fontenay-sous-Bois, France. --Chabe01 15:45, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion OK for me --PantheraLeo1359531 12:34, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The village Rucadic in the Gherdëina valley. --Moroder 13:12, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion There is a little string (see note), otherwise good quality and high res --PantheraLeo1359531 13:44, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Done Thanks --Moroder 16:00, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Thank you :) --PantheraLeo1359531 10:57, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Bobergsskolan is a school in Norra Djurgårdstaden. --ArildV 05:28, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
The highlights should be reduced a bit and the verticals on the right building checked. --Ermell 06:30, 26 April 2020 (UTC) Done thanks for review--ArildV 12:08, 26 April 2020 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:35, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination View of Grieghallen from Mount Fløyen, Bergen, Norway --Poco a poco 06:31, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose As a general view, I expect an unobstructed view of the building for QI. Crop on architectural details could work though, if the resolution is high enough. --MB-one 20:00, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Political Map of Argentina by Andres Rojas --Ezarate 19:24, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
the disputed territories should have a description, as it is currently unclear, to which province (?) they belong. Also the "Tierra del Fuego ..." writing should be placed in an unobstructed area, to be easily legible. Otherwise a very good map. --MB-one 12:42, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
thanks MB-one see now --Ezarate 17:13, 26 April 2020 (UTC) Support Very good now. Thanks! --MB-one 13:41, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination: Giant spear lily, Doryanthes palmeri, habitus; Santa Catarina Park, Funchal --Llez 04:30, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: A street sign in Hof. --PantheraLeo1359531 18:16, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: A lion statue in Hof. --PantheraLeo1359531 18:05, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Information board of the botanical garden in Hof. --PantheraLeo1359531 17:49, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Construction crane reflected in mirrored glass of adjacent building. By User:Bjwhite66212 --Tomer T 16:09, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
- Review Very nice idea and good quality, but Kansas is a very big state. Any prospect of getting at least slightly more location info? -- Ikan Kekek 02:29, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pencil holder with colored pencils. By User:ThoBel-0043 --Tomer T 16:09, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:38, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Boot made from Dyneema-reinforced leather at OutDoor 2018, Friedrichshafen --MB-one 10:14, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Castle of Soubès, Hérault, France. --Tournasol7 06:48, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:37, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Un vendedor ambulante en uno de los mercados de la Alcaldía Cuauhtémoc.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:. By User:EneasMx --ProtoplasmaKid 18:33, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. Updated the categories a bit. Please check proper categorization before you nominate an image. --MB-one 13:33, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: A flower bed in Hof. --PantheraLeo1359531 16:15, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Review Das Bild ist arg verzogen. Schau die schiefen Bäume und die blaue Begrenzung rechts. Vielleicht lässt sich daran noch etwas tun. -- Spurzem 17:42, 20 April 2020 (UTC) Done Danke für den Hinweis, hab es mal versucht, zu retten :) --PantheraLeo1359531 17:07, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View to Moravian-Silesian Beskids from Doubrava, Karviná District, Moravian-Silesian Region, Czechia in November 2019 --T.Bednarz 15:55, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
Dust spots need to be removed. --Ermell 20:49, 20 April 2020 (UTC) Done --T.Bednarz 14:52, 26 April 2020 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:39, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A path (other side) in park Theresienstein. --PantheraLeo1359531 13:44, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:16, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Svolvær, Lofoten, Norway --Poco a poco 07:27, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --ArildV 06:40, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Plate indicating the end of delimitation of the locality of possotomè in Benin --Adoscam 16:17, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Comment Tlted --Moroder 08:46, 20 April 2020 (UTC) Comment I would not necessarily assume, that the poles are perfectly upright. Thus, it's hard to assess, if the image is tilted or the poles. --MB-one 14:09, 23 April 2020 (UTC) Support Assuming crooked sign poles, good quality. --MB-one 13:16, 27 April 2020 (UTC) - Promotion {{{2}}}
- Nomination Plate indicating the end of delimitation of the locality of possotomè in Benin --Adoscam 16:17, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.JPG)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg)
_05.jpg)
_01.jpg)
.jpg)
.JPG){kind=link}
,_parque_nacional_de_Chobe,_Botsuana,_2018-07-28,_DD_24.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_08.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Consensual review
editFile:Kronester_Kaffeebecher,_Indisch_Blau_(2020-04-28_Sp).JPG
edit.JPG)
- Nomination Indian blue coffee mug by Kronester Spurzem 14:05, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
Oppose Not sharp --Michielverbeek 18:37, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
- @Michielverbeek: Please take a look at the picture in natural size. The cup is actually 8.5 cm high. But maybe you're right. -- Spurzem 18:46, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
Comment But the edges of the cup are sharp. I believe that the pattern is blurred. --Ermell 18:53, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
Support Somewhat low DOF, the handle of the cup could be a little sharper. But the pattern is what it is. I have similar chinaware where the pattern is also blurred. --Smial 08:36, 29 April 2020 (UTC)- Oppose per Michielverbeek. Plus noise. --A.Savin 16:01, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
- @A.Savin: Of course, the terrible noise is the biggest lack. But I don't see it. I withdraw. -- Spurzem 17:13, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --Milseburg 10:27, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
File:Elefante_africano_de_sabana_(Loxodonta_africana),_parque_nacional_de_Chobe,_Botsuana,_2018-07-28,_DD_24.jpg
edit,_parque_nacional_de_Chobe,_Botsuana,_2018-07-28,_DD_24.jpg)
- Nomination Baby African bush elephant (Loxodonta africana), Chobe National Park, Botsuana --Poco a poco 10:20, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Looks very grainy to me, as if it's overprocessed or something. --Peulle 12:20, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support I disagree. O.K. for me. --Ermell 22:13, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
- The processing looks OK now after the new edit, but the image has now been downsized too, so I stand by my oppose.--Peulle 11:44, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Camera shake. --Smial 11:49, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → 
Declined --Seven Pandas 20:49, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Declined --Seven Pandas 20:49, 29 April 2020 (UTC)File:20191215_Pycnonotus_cafer_humayuni,_Pushkar_1141_8757.jpg
edit
- Nomination Red-vented bulbul (Pycnonotus cafer humayuni) in Pushkar --Jakubhal 05:16, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:41, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
- Is that red natural or has it been enhanced please. ~~~~ --Charlesjsharp 20:55, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
- Yes it is natural. Please look for more photos of "Red-vented bulbul". --Jakubhal 04:44, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks. I have photographed this bird many times, and have not seen the vent so bright. The red below the wire didn't seem the same colour as the red above. Charlesjsharp 08:28, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
- The part over the wire is in the shadow. Sorry, it seems ridiculous for me to accuse of enhancement of some selected body parts. I have better things to do --Jakubhal 08:52, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks. I have photographed this bird many times, and have not seen the vent so bright. The red below the wire didn't seem the same colour as the red above. Charlesjsharp 08:28, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
- Yes it is natural. Please look for more photos of "Red-vented bulbul". --Jakubhal 04:44, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support a somewhat unconventional perspective, but such views are also useful. Good quality. -- Smial 14:58, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → 
Promoted --Seven Pandas 20:48, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Promoted --Seven Pandas 20:48, 29 April 2020 (UTC)File:Epeus_indicus09205.jpg
edit
- Nomination Epeus indicus --Vengolis 03:31, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
- Decline Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:41, 24 April 2020 (UTC) Oppose I disagree. Insufficient definition --Charlesjsharp 20:57, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Question - Per w:Epeus: "Females are 7–9 mm long, males 6–9 mm." In view of that, is decent definition at 8 cm at the furthest expanse (i.e., full size on my 13-inch monitor) insufficient? How big should the magnification be? -- Ikan Kekek 05:59, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
I don't know what sort of 35mm lens was used, but you need a macro lens to get close enough (I use 100mm). Charlesjsharp 08:32, 26 April 2020 (UTC)- Oppose No detail. --Smial 15:01, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --Seven Pandas 20:47, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Declined --Seven Pandas 20:47, 29 April 2020 (UTC)File:Caminata_por_los_perros_y_animales_Maracaibo_2012_(51).jpg
edit.jpg)
- Nomination You may select the license of your choice. --Wilfredor 15:28, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Decline Nice but not good. Woman and dog are in the back light and the dog is missing a piece of the left foot. Too bad. -- Spurzem 23:04, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
@Spurzem: Thanks, please, take another look --Wilfredor 23:48, 23 April 2020 (UTC) - Support Good now -- Spurzem 09:55, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but this copy'n paste of the missing dog paw is too obvious for me. --PtrQs 10:47, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Very nice snapshot, but by far overprocessed. --Smial 11:53, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose There's a CA on the woman's sleeve but the image looks overprocessed anyways. --T.Bednarz 12:35, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined -- Seven Pandas 20:46, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Declined -- Seven Pandas 20:46, 29 April 2020 (UTC)File:Vista_de_Sintra_desde_Castelo_dos_Mouros,_Portugal,_2019-05-25,_DD_90-101_PAN.jpg
edit
- Nomination View of Sintra from Castelo dos Mouros, Portugal --Poco a poco 10:09, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 11:10, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
* Check the horizon. It´s very tilted on the left side. --Milseburg 10:53, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
Oppose I disagree.
- True, I uploaded a new version Poco a poco 11:06, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support Think, it's ok for QI now. --Milseburg 13:15, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted --Seven Pandas 20:45, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Promoted --Seven Pandas 20:45, 29 April 2020 (UTC)File:Wandeling_over_het_Hulshorsterzand-Hulshorsterheide_07-03-2020._(d.j.b)_08.jpg
edit_08.jpg)
- Nomination Walk across the Hulshorsterzand/Hulshorsterheide. View through to the drifting sand area.--Famberhorst 05:39, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:03, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose WB off. --Kallerna 11:59, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
- Comment does look a bit yellow. Charlesjsharp 08:29, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Done. WB. correction Thank you for your reviews.--Famberhorst 15:42, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support Very good now -- Spurzem 23:32, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Seven Pandas 20:44, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Promoted --Seven Pandas 20:44, 29 April 2020 (UTC)File:Häuslein_im_Luitpoldhain_am_Thomasweiher_20200406_01.jpg
edit
- Nomination A shed in Luipoldhain, Theresienstein. --PantheraLeo1359531 12:58, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:07, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Harsh light, no detail in highlights. --Kallerna 05:05, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support - I'm not seeing a problem. -- Ikan Kekek 08:56, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support Nor am I.--Peulle 12:47, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support -- Spurzem 14:32, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Criticism can be and should be. But it has to remain factual and understandable, even if QI is just a game and not essential for life. But we shouldn't try to spoil the fun of the game for others, as it obviously is done here and in some other cases. -- Spurzem 14:32, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support Kallerna you should not judge photos on how QI should be, but how QI is. To be an outlier is not popular - I know from bitter experience! Of course the photogapher Poco a poco could play further with this image, but the same can be said for 99% of QI noms, including mine. Charlesjsharp (talk)
- For the record, Charlesjsharp, I don't play with other users' images and only do that after I got permission to do so. Poco a poco 11:16, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
- I know, sorry, I meant the photographer. Charlesjsharp 11:55, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
- Actually, "the quality of QIs" used to be something else what it is nowadays. The fact that unexperienced contributors have started to review the photos have dropped the quality. It is not how it should be. --Kallerna 17:41, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
- I have a lot of sympathy for your opinion, but like on FP, if you try to impose your newly-formed standards on prefectly good candidates, you will be criticised. Although QI standards have slipped, FP standards have increased as one can tell by looking at your own FPs. Charlesjsharp 19:34, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
- Discussion about FPs should not be here, but I disagree on that also. Maybe the size of images have increased and to some extend, the technical quality (due to the development of digital cameras) but some years ago only the extraordinary, interesting pictures got the status. --Kallerna 05:26, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Seven Pandas 20:43, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Promoted --Seven Pandas 20:43, 29 April 2020 (UTC)File:Svolvær,_Lofoten,_Noruega,_2019-09-05,_DD_101.jpg
edit
- Nomination Svolvær, Lofoten, Norway --Poco a poco 07:27, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Oppose Underexposed. --Kallerna 04:56, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
It looks realistic to me according to the weather conditions. --Poco a poco 20:04, 22 April 2020 (UTC) - Support Just a miserable day. If you're in marketing, then brighten it up. Charlesjsharp 08:42, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support Nothing wrong for me.--Ermell 21:49, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted ----Seven Pandas 20:42, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Promoted ----Seven Pandas 20:42, 29 April 2020 (UTC)File:Svolvær,_Lofoten,_Noruega,_2019-09-05,_DD_102.jpg
edit
- Nomination Svolvær, Lofoten, Norway --Poco a poco 07:27, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Oppose Underexposed. --Kallerna 04:56, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
It looks realistic to me according to the weather conditions. --Poco a poco 20:04, 22 April 2020 (UTC) - Support Just a miserable day. If you're in marketing, then brighten it up. Charlesjsharp 08:44, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support o.k. for me. The sharpness of all the series is declining towards the sides. Maybe that could be improved.--Ermell 21:51, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted ----Seven Pandas 20:42, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Promoted ----Seven Pandas 20:42, 29 April 2020 (UTC)File:Svolvær,_Lofoten,_Noruega,_2019-09-05,_DD_103.jpg
edit
- Nomination Svolvær, Lofoten, Norway --Poco a poco 07:27, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion Tilted, cw.--Peulle 08:03, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Underexposed. --Kallerna 04:56, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
- Done I fixed the tilt, regarding the exposure it looks realistic to me according to the weather conditions and definitely no reason for a straight decline, you should work on your way to interact here, Kallerna --Poco a poco 20:04, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
- But it was not the best weather for QI. -- Spurzem 14:41, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support Just a miserable day. If you're in marketing, then brighten it up. Charlesjsharp 08:44, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support o.k.--Ermell 21:52, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted ----Seven Pandas 20:41, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Promoted ----Seven Pandas 20:41, 29 April 2020 (UTC)File:Humle_på_Selje_(6).jpg
edit.jpg)
- Nomination Bumblebee feeding on Goat willow.--Peulle 07:00, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:15, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Almost exact copy with Humle_på_Selje_(7).jpg. Please nominate only your best work. The crop should be much tigher here also. --Kallerna 04:54, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support - Good quality and the position of the antennae is different in this photo. The decision not to crop out an unsharp plant on the right is the prerogative of the artist. It's part of the form he desires. -- Ikan Kekek 10:55, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
- Just to clarify: only some 5 % of the photo is sharp, otherwise it is completely out of focus. This is also the case with the another picture. In other words, the plant is nowhere near sharp, and that is why the crop should definitely be tighter. I personally also think that these two images are way too similar to promote both. --Kallerna 11:44, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Kallerna: In my opinion, the composition of the picture is good. The main object is in focus and the surroundings are out of focus, as it should be with such a photo. -- Spurzem 17:15, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
- Right. This is a macro photo of a bee. -- Ikan Kekek 00:18, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Actually the used objective is not intended for macro photography. So this is just a normal photo of a small object. Compare with a macro photo of a bee. --Kallerna 11:14, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- OK, but it's still a closeup of a bee. -- Ikan Kekek 12:41, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Actually the used objective is not intended for macro photography. So this is just a normal photo of a small object. Compare with a macro photo of a bee. --Kallerna 11:14, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Right. This is a macro photo of a bee. -- Ikan Kekek 00:18, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Kallerna: In my opinion, the composition of the picture is good. The main object is in focus and the surroundings are out of focus, as it should be with such a photo. -- Spurzem 17:15, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
- Comment In this case, I feel I need to clarify my opinion: 1) Opposing both photos because they are similar feels a bit wrong to me; if I am to pick only one of only two photos to nominate, the reviewer should pick one to oppose and the other to promote. 2) I don't like cropping images just for the sake of it. This image was taken with maximum zoom (400mm) and I could not get closer to the bumblebee as this would have disturbed her. The focus is on the insect as it should be. The current crop also includes the plant she is feeding on, which I feel is relevant. Increasing the DoF would in this case require focus stacking, which I believe is physically impossible to achieve on this constantly moving subject. That said, it is always possible for anyone wishing to use this image to perform a crop themselves.--Peulle 19:00, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
- Comment You should pick your best work to nominate, not just nominate all pictures and then see which ones will succeed. I think we can agree that the bee is the only object that is in focus in this picture - if only 5 % or less of the photo is in focus, do you really think it's worth the status? And about the physical limitation - for starters check the work by User:Makro Freak, even I, with my mediocre photographing skills, have been able to get much closer. --Kallerna 08:31, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, absolutely, I think this is a good example of a QI, because the main subject is perfectly sharp. The fact that there are other things in the vicinity of the subject, so long as they don't obscure it or serve to disturb the composition, is not (and to my knowledge never has been) a factor lending weight to an oppose vote here at QIC. As for whether other photographers can get closer to the insects they shoot, I tried getting closer but when I did, the bumblebees would fly away. Standing about one metre away was as close as I could get. Given that they only stayed on each flower for a couple of seconds, there was no way to get closer without losing them.--Peulle 12:43, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Ok, then we have to disagree. The fact that you couldn't get closer doesn't mean that it would be impossible - I'm only judging the result. Focused part should be the main subject, and form reasonable partion of the frame. Now the focused part forms maybe ~0.3 MP (rough estimate). --Kallerna 15:00, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose I oppose simply because the bee isn't sharp. There is no reason to keep such a wide crop in this composition and a closer crop would reveal the lack of sharpness. It is no problem to get closer with a 400mm lens though bees are really tricky to capture. On the matter of multiple nominations, I too feel that one shouldn't nominate a batch of virtually identical images unless they show some interesting aspect of behaviour. See QI guidelines. Charlesjsharp 08:56, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose per Charles.--Ermell 21:54, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Seven Pandas 20:40, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Declined --Seven Pandas 20:40, 29 April 2020 (UTC)File:Étang_de_l'Ermite,_le_long_du_Sentier_du_Vuylbeek_(DSCF7007).jpg
edit.jpg)
- Nomination Pond along Sentier du Vuylbeek in Watermael-Boitsfort, Belgium --Trougnouf 18:11, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose Nice composition but lots of CA and not very sharp --Moroder 10:03, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Done I removed lots of CA and sharpened slightly, can you review? --Trougnouf 10:53, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- Comment - The sharpness looks fine, but the sky seems a bit greenish to me. -- Ikan Kekek 21:25, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Done I changed the white balance and (masked) color balance, how is it? --Trougnouf 18:03, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
- I'm still unsure about it. The difference is subtle, and a lot of the smaller branches look blue, which I guess is CA? -- Ikan Kekek 08:14, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
- Comment That might be due to the CA removal (defringe) indeed, not sure I can fix it. Can you point out an area that you find is particularly affected? (annotation on the picture, I can remove it later.) --Trougnouf 12:22, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Done. -- Ikan Kekek 01:14, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you! I think it's fixed in the latest version, can you review? --Trougnouf 11:17, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support - Good quality now, big improvement. Moroder, what do you think now? -- Ikan Kekek 00:38, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
- Support New version is fine imo.--ArildV 15:30, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Seven Pandas 20:39, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Promoted --Seven Pandas 20:39, 29 April 2020 (UTC)