Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 19 2023

Consensual review

edit

File:CH.VS.Zermatt_2019-12-27_Mount-Matterhorn_7227_16x9-R_10K.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Matterhorn, seen from Hotel Artist, Zermatt, Switzerland. By User:Roy Egloff --Augustgeyler 07:55, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •   Support Nice work --Mister rf 09:16, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose I disagree. I'm not entirely convinced of the processing. Let's take the degree on the top left. There's a hem. And the masts of the mountain railway seem to have a crack. Further down in the image you can see transitions and cracks in the processing. --Milseburg 14:00, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose per Milseburg --LexKurochkin 06:06, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose →   Declined   --Peulle 12:08, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

File:Niké_de_Samotracia_-_A742493.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Nike of Samothrace. --Rjcastillo 03:28, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 04:03, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose No beef against the image itself, but the text in the picture might be a copyright violation -- 23:43, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Yes, there should be a copyright declaration about the reproduced text. --Augustgeyler 14:13, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
  •   Done --Rjcastillo 05:52, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
    •   Question Can writing a text about a cultural subject be seen as "The reproduction of architectural works", as stated in the declaration?
    •   Neutral Thank you for adding the declaration. I can not say if these texts are included into that law. --Augustgeyler 20:34, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 08:24, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 13:00, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --Augustgeyler 06:13, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

File:Información_del_camélido_extinto,_Paleolama_-_A740640.jpg

edit

 

  • Nomination Information on the extinct camelid, Paleolama. --Rjcastillo 03:28, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •   Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 04:03, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose No beef against the image itself, but the text in the picture might be a copyright violation -- 23:43, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Yes, there should be a copyright declaration about the reproduced graphics and text. --Augustgeyler 14:14, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
  •   Done --Rjcastillo 05:51, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
    •   Neutral Thank you for adding the declaration. I can not say if these texts are included into that law. --Augustgeyler 20:35, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
  •   Support Good quality.--Palauenc05 11:19, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose →   Promoted   --August Geyler (talk) 06:14, 18 April 2023 (UTC)