Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 08 2017

• 
  • Nomination Stever culvert at Dortmund-Ems chanel in Senden, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:34, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:32, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Valley fog in Connecticut. Juliancolton 03:11, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very nice motive. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:13, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Exterior main portal of the cathedral on Domplatz #1, Gurk, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 01:57, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:29, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Open-air museum in Pstrążna 1 --Jacek Halicki 23:00, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:15, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Open-air museum in Pstrążna 2 --Jacek Halicki 23:00, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very nice. Juliancolton 02:23, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Open-air museum in Pstrążna 3 --Jacek Halicki 23:00, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion [email protected] -- Johann Jaritz 02:15, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Open-air museum in Pstrążna 4 --Jacek Halicki 23:00, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Acceptable quality, works for me. Juliancolton 02:23, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A railway switch lever in the industrial area of Grötö in Lysekil, Sweden. --W.carter 21:18, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Technically good and an interesting image, nicely done. Juliancolton 02:30, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Haghpat Monastery, Armenia --Poco a poco 19:53, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality and it rewards the viewer to look inside at full size. -- Ikan Kekek 23:49, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sevanavank Monastery, Armenia --Poco a poco 19:53, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --W.carter 21:24, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Logo des Gerbers. By User:Moheen Reeyad --Moheen Reeyad 18:51, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion OK: size requirement does not apply to .SVG files. --Peulle 21:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nordisk Familjebåt, NF, logo. By User:Moheen Reeyad --Moheen Reeyad 18:51, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion OK: size requirement does not apply to .SVG files. --Peulle 21:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Logo of the Sundazed Records. By User:Moheen Reeyad --Moheen Reeyad 18:51, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion OK: size requirement does not apply to .SVG files. --Peulle 21:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Logo of The Thanhouser Company. By User:Moheen Reeyad --Moheen Reeyad 18:51, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion OK: size requirement does not apply to .SVG files. --Peulle 21:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination শব্দচিহ্ন সহ "ডব্লিউ" চিহ্ন. By User:Moheen Reeyad --Moheen Reeyad 18:51, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Kritzolina 19:16, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination ÖBB 5022-027 near Görtschach-Förolach --Liberaler Humanist 17:38, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 18:07, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A switch position signal in Austria. --Liberaler Humanist 17:38, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 18:15, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The door (eastern) of the castle of Bournazel, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 17:31, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline Sorry but this is not sharp enough IMO --Ermell 18:17, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Castle of Bournazel, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 17:31, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline Not sharp enough for me for a Q1 and it also needs a rotation and/or perspective correction. I am curious to see the castle after the restauration --Michielverbeek 19:00, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Walk across the Hulshorsterzand. Dead tree and young oak (Quercus).
    --Famberhorst 17:25, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 18:19, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Walk across the Hulshorsterzand. Dead tree and young oak (Quercus).
    --Famberhorst 17:25, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Black and white was a good choice --Daniel Case 19:14, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gate at the castle in Senden, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 17:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:26, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Streets "Haselbrink" and "Am Burdiek" in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 17:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nothing technically wrong with it --Daniel Case 19:14, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Street "Sythener Weg" in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 17:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:26, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Street "Westhagen" in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 17:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 18:20, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Office building of the LVM, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 16:37, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:28, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• • Nomination Mathematical object for illustrating solids of revolution on display at Matemateca IME-USP, by Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton --Leandroxavier 15:55, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 18:14, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• • Nomination Mathematical object for illustrating solids of revolution on display at Matemateca IME-USP, by Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton --Leandroxavier 15:55, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 18:13, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Town hall of Luquin. Navarre, Spain --Basotxerri 15:14, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Bijay chaurasia 15:57, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church of Luquin. Navarre, Spain --Basotxerri 15:14, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:57, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Medical centre in Luquin. Navarre, Spain --Basotxerri 15:14, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:49, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Abandoned building in Espronceda. Navarre, Spain --Basotxerri 15:14, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:03, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Los Fueros Square in Espronceda, Town Hall. Navarre, Spain --Basotxerri 15:14, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:03, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Reste eines Weinkellers in Minichhofen/Niederösterreich. --Manfred Kuzel 15:07, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:03, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sitzendorfer Kellergasse in Minichhofen/Niederösterreich. --Manfred Kuzel 15:07, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline This is unsharp where I look, something has gone wrong. It's a pity because it's a nice composition. --Basotxerri 15:19, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Reste eines Weinkellers in Minichhofen/Niederösterreich. --Manfred Kuzel 15:07, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:22, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Weinkeller in Minichhofen/Niederösterreich. --Manfred Kuzel 15:07, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:22, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Weinkeller in Minichhofen/Niederösterreich. --Manfred Kuzel 15:07, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:20, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
     Oppose Rasters in the sky. --A.Savin 15:46, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
     Oppose per A.Savin. -- Ikan Kekek 19:21, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
     Oppose Sorry, I didn't see it (although it's not very strong). BTW, what can be the reason? --Basotxerri 19:38, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination spring in Beja Tunisia --IssamBarhoumi 14:55, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline When taking a picture like this you should get at least one of the subjects sharp, unfortunately neither of both is. --Basotxerri 15:17, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Doberlug-Kirchhain, Brandenburg: House Rautenstock --A.Savin 14:34, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion I think that the image is OK but that central sign really bothers me. Have you thought about a better crop without it? --Basotxerri 15:25, 5 April 2017 (UTC)  Comment It would be really way too tight crop. To clone out is possible, but the grey sign on grey ground doesn't bother me. But perhaps I better should have used my Sigma8-16 indeed --A.Savin 15:42, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Doberlug-Kirchhain, Brandenburg: Doberlug Castle --A.Savin 14:34, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:09, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Doberlug-Kirchhain, Brandenburg: Doberlug Castle --A.Savin 14:34, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Halavar 14:57, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Doberlug-Kirchhain, Brandenburg: St.Mary Church --A.Savin 14:34, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:51, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Doberlug-Kirchhain, Brandenburg: door of St.Mary Church --A.Savin 14:34, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Halavar 14:57, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination La phare du Môle Saint Louis à Sète, Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 11:28, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 12:49, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hindu statues. Sri Krishnan Temple. Rochor, Central Region, Singapore. --Halavar 10:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:11, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kwan Im Thong Hood Cho Temple. Rochor, Central Region, Singapore. --Halavar 10:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose sorry but it seems to me that the focus is not on the subject but in front of it --Christian Ferrer 11:33, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Abdul Gaffoor Mosque. Little India, Central Region, Singapore. --Halavar 10:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --A.Savin 14:30, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shophouses. Kerbau Road. Little India, Central Region, Singapore. --Halavar 10:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:30, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wayside shrine in Pstrążna 1 --Jacek Halicki 09:12, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 12:48, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wayside shrine in Pstrążna 2 --Jacek Halicki 09:12, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:26, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wayside shrine in Pstrążna 3 --Jacek Halicki 09:12, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion OK. --A.Savin 14:29, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Open-air museum in Pstrążna 1 --Jacek Halicki 09:12, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:26, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Open-air museum in Pstrążna 2 --Jacek Halicki 09:12, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Staggering motive. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:27, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Santi Filippo e Giacomo (Naples) - Dome --Livioandronico2013 08:34, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:46, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eggerbach passage of the Ludwig-Danube-Main-Canal in Neuses on the Regnitz (Eggolsheim) --Ermell 07:38, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:35, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Arch bridge over the Eggerbach in Neuses at the Regnitz 1836-45 --Ermell 07:38, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:42, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sandstone column in Neuses at the Regnitz --Ermell 07:38, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:35, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Community house in Junkersdorf --Ermell 07:38, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:42, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Reconstruction of the lock-keepers cottage at Lock 94 of the Ludwig-Danube-Main Canal in Eggolsheim --Ermell 07:38, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:14, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• • Nomination A prairie dog eating a carrot by the railroad tracks in downtown Santa Fe. --Grendelkhan 07:37, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 07:39, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Deutsches Eck in Koblenz where the Moselle joins the Rhine seen from the cable car --Berthold Werner 07:03, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 07:41, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fly pines surrounding sand dune area. (Pinus sylvestris).
    --Famberhorst 05:40, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 06:56, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mud Depot Broek bij Joure. Highly dangerous Quicksand.
    --Famberhorst 05:40, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:49, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Electric multiple unit ER9M-519 in Ukraine -- George Chernilevsky 05:09, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:13, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Close wing of Papilio nephelus Boisduval, 1836 – Yellow Helen. By User:Tamaghna Sengupta --Bodhisattwa 04:51, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 07:00, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Close wing of Troides helena Linnaeus, 1758 – Common Birdwing. By User:Tamaghna Sengupta --Bodhisattwa 04:44, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 11:31, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fammensrakken Mûzekamp, Boornzwaag (Netherlands).
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:42, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:49, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Open wing of Charaxes marmax Westwood, 1847 – Yellow Rajah. By User:Tamaghna Sengupta --Bodhisattwa 04:30, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 07:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Open wing of Mimathyma ambica Kollar, 1844 – Indian Purple Emperor. By User:Tamaghna Sengupta --Bodhisattwa 04:30, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Beautiful butterfly and good-quality photo. -- Ikan Kekek 06:05, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chapter house on Domplatz #1, Gurk, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:04, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 06:51, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Overdoor at the chapter house`s portal on Domplatz #1, Gurk, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:04, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:17, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Overdoor of the western portal to the yard of the monastery, Gurk, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:04, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 06:52, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination State Library reading room --Villy Fink Isaksen 20:23, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion With regret: Great view, but some noise and needs perspective correction --Daniel Case 03:41, 5 April 2017 (UTC) Done correction. --Villy Fink Isaksen 08:12, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
     SupportO.K. for me --Ermell 18:23, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
     Support I'm OK, now, too. Daniel Case 19:09, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination State Library reading room --Villy Fink Isaksen 20:23, 4 April 2017 (UTC) Comment Great view. After noise reduction and sharpening and CA removing it might be a QI--Ermell 06:59, 5 April 2017 (UTC) Done correction. --Villy Fink Isaksen 08:12, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 18:22, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Clocks Chairs in Friesland Klokkenstoel Dijken in the Fryske Marren (Netherlands). Front.
    --Famberhorst 18:02, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good focus to main object, but unfortunately too noisy --Michielverbeek 22:02, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
     Done. Noise Reduction Thank you.--Famberhorst 05:11, 5 April 2017 (UTC) It is looking better --Michielverbeek 07:00, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Echarren de Guirguillano, Navarre, Spain --Basotxerri 15:00, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:48, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Guirguillano, Navarre, Spain --Basotxerri 15:00, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:48, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Entrance of the Cha gorge, Monastiraki, Crete --Oltau 21:57, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline Too big dark and unsharp area --Ezarate 14:13, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of the Palacio de Bellas Artes, Mexico City, from its southeast in the evening --Daniel Case 05:11, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion The building is sharp is nice and sharp enough and the cables are unavoidable, but the streetlamp on the right is really ruining the pic. Do do think you could clone that out and perhaps soften the posterized lights on the cars down right? --W.carter 08:37, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
    @W.carter: I'll try to get to that tonight. Daniel Case 20:42, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
     Done I actually decided to get rid of the wires as well. Daniel Case 16:46, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
    Nice! :) Good quality. --W.carter 19:17, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Forêt d'Ifrane après les précipitations de 2010. By User:Ghottes --Reda benkhadra 13:36, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Decline Rampant purple fringing and unsharpness --Daniel Case 19:06, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Les ruines de la Casbah de Boulaouane dominant les méandres de l'oued Oum Er-Rbia. By User:Laszlo1801 --Reda benkhadra 13:36, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Almost oversharpened, though --Daniel Case 19:06, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Palazzo Gidoni Bembo and Rio de San Zan Degolà in Venice --Moroder 19:18, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Too harsh shadow for me. -- Spurzem 19:55, 31 March 2017 (UTC) Comment Sometimes Venice is dirty sometimes it is like this. ;-).--Moroder 20:15, 31 March 2017 (UTC)  Question Do you think I should send it to Graphic labs --Moroder 21:00, 31 March 2017 (UTC)  Support There are no complaints about this image. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:54, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Water fountain with pigeons (Columba livia) in Corte de la Cazza in Venice. --Moroder 12:43, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Promotion Can you remove the yellow drinking straw? Further the image seems a bit gloomy. -- Spurzem 12:49, 27 March 2017 (UTC)  Question This is realistic Venice. Do I have to clean up also the sigarette stumps and the rust ;-) --Moroder 21:12, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
    I thought you wanted to show us a fountain and not filth. ;-) I beg your pardon. -- Spurzem 22:04, 27 March 2017 (UTC) Comment I want to show Venice as is. Servus --Moroder 11:22, 28 March 2017 (UTC)  Support For me the photo has real good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:51, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:Mülheim-Kärlich, Christophorusschule Kärlich 2015-10-31.JPG

• Nomination Building site of Christophorus school in Mülheim-Kärlich in October 2015
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:44, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose I disagree. Pretty casual composition --Moroder 20:52, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

@Moroder: Thank you for this laughable revenge. -- Spurzem 21:17, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

 Comment Revenge what for? I'm just giving my opinion and not only to your pictures. I strongly believe that composition is essential for QI and would like some others opinion. So viel musst man schon aushalten ;-) --Moroder 21:25, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Neutral A bit soft, but the composition is fine; closeup shots are needed on Commons too. I'd like to see the categories and description a bit more specific, though, to reflect that this is a construction site.--Peulle 08:33, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

 Done. @Peulle: Pleas look now. -- Spurzem 10:30, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

 Support Better.--Peulle 12:25, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

 Question Not in revenge ;-) what's the UFO top right --Moroder 14:01, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Maybe that it is a part of the crane. I don't know. But I am sure that it is not an UFO. It would be easy to retouch. -- Spurzem 14:57, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

@Moroder: Das Rätsel ist gelöst. Es ist der untere Teil des Zebrastreifenschildes über der Straße – also wirklich kein UFO. -- Spurzem 19:56, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

 Comment You should put a note! People are scared by UFOS --Moroder 21:23, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Oppose Perspective is distorted, some chromatic aberrations on lantern masts, and overall lacking sharpness. Pretty obviously an out-of-camera-JPEG without proper raw data development. --A.Savin 01:30, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Von A.Savin hatte ich wirklich nichts anderes erwartet und frage mich tatsächlich, warum ich hier überhaupt noch mitmache. Er hatte es mir vor paar Tagen ja schon empfohlen, mich zu verabschieden. -- Spurzem 19:50, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Support die Perspektive ist natürlich und ok so. --Ralf Roletschek 21:05, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose - I'm ultimately on the "con" side of this, essentially per Moroder and A.Savin: The photo is interesting, but the crop on the right side is distracting. I also don't like the things on the right leaning right and the things on the left leaning left. That is not natural to me. -- Ikan Kekek 03:58, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

The perspective is corrected now. -- Spurzem 13:57, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

I cleared my cache, and in my opinion, it's not, though it's better, nor are the problems with the right crop fixed. -- Ikan Kekek 21:10, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

•  Support composition??? Is QI not FP here! --Livioandronico2013 21:57, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 06:39, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Mülheim-Kärlich, Christophorusschule Kärlich 2016-01-26.jpg

• Nomination Building site of Christophorus school in Mülheim-Kärlich in January 2016 -- Spurzem 19:23, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:44, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose I disagree. The composition looks pretty casual and the hedges up front don't help --Moroder 20:56, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

@Moroder: Thank you for this laughable revenge. -- Spurzem 21:17, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Support - I don't love the cropped minibus on the left, but the composition is quite OK, overall, and the quality is good. -- Ikan Kekek 06:11, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose The composition is a bit lacking, since parts of the construction is cut off on the left. This shot clearly demonstrates that a better one was possible. It's not the only issue, though: there are green chromatic aberration and the image is tilted CW.--Peulle 08:30, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

I don't think that the image is tilted but if you mean it must be. ;-) -- Spurzem 08:44, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Yes, I think so. I checked the verticals against the crane, the signs and the lampposts.--Peulle 12:28, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

 Done. @Peulle: Would you kindly look once more? -- Spurzem 18:03, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Well, the tilt is better but the other issues aren't fixable.--Peulle 21:47, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Oppose Per Moroder, sorry. --Basotxerri 15:29, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

O.K., Basotxerri, ich weiß Bescheid. Schön, dass Du Deine (?) Meinung wenigstens noch bedauerst. -- Spurzem 19:51, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

 Comment I'm really not sure what's going on here. I'm really trying to judge an image not a person. And in this image for me the tree in front is very disturbing because the subject is the construction site behind. Others may think differently like Ikan does and that's good because we all have different opinions. But it's not personal. My photos get rejected ocasionally. I try to learn from it and I personally think that I'm a far better photographer than a year and a half ago when I started in QIC. That's the point for me, keep calm and think about it, really. And I insist, this isn't a personal offence, it's only a well-intentioned practical advice. --Basotxerri 20:43, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

•  Support --Ralf Roletschek 21:28, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Livioandronico2013 21:54, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 06:42, 7 April 2017 (UTC)