Commons:Picture of the Year/2006/Voting phase 2/archive 1

Vote - Vota - Voto - 投票

العربية: من فضلك أضف تصويتاتك الجديدة عند نهاية القائمة التالية.

Català: Si us plau, afegiu el vostre vot a la fi de la llista següent.

Čeština: Prosíme, přidejte své hlasy na konec seznamu.

Dansk: Stem venligst ved at tilføje din stemme nederst på den følgende liste.

Deutsch: Bitte neue Stimmen in der folgenden Liste unten anfügen.

English: Please add your new votes to the end of the following list.

Español: Por favor, inserta tu voto al final de la siguiente lista.

Français : Veuillez ajouter vos nouveaux votes à la fin de la liste suivante.

Galego: Por favor insira os seus votos no fin da lista.

Magyar: Kérünk, szavazatod a lista végén add le.

Italiano: Aggiungi il tuo voto alla fine della seguente lista.

日本語: 投票する場合は次のリストの一番最後に追加して下さい。

Nederlands: Voegt u alstublieft stemmen aan het eind van de volgende lijst toe.

Polski: Proszę dodawać nowe głosy na końcu tej strony.

Português: Por favor insira os seus votos no fim da lista.

Română: Vă rugăm să vă adaugaţi voturile la sfârşitul listei de dedesubt.

Русский: Чтобы проголосовать, пожалуйста, добавьте ваш голос в конец списка.

Shqip: Ju lutem shtoni votat tuaja në fund të listës së mëposhtëme.

Српски / srpski: Молимо додајте свој глас на крај списка гласова.

Slovenščina: Prosimo, dodajte svoj glas na konec spodnjega seznama.

Suomi: Lisääthän äänesi seuraavan listan perään.

Svenska: Var god och skriv dina nya röster i slutet av följande lista.

Türkçe: Lütfen oylarınızı aşağıdaki listenin sonuna ekleyiniz.

中文（中国大陆）：请将您的投票加在投票名单的末尾。

中文（臺灣）：請將您的投票加在投票名單的末尾。

a - example vote by Commons user - MichaelMaggs 22:50, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
z - example vote by user without a Commons Userid - diff 85.139.196.32 23:25, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Votes

9 - A great pic ;-) SMP (talk page) 00:12, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
11 - This is a great example of an everyday object turned extraordinary. --Tewy 00:48, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
5 - after great consideration. 11 would be my second, but in order to see the beauty of it you have to study it in detail - 5 is amazing even at first glance. 9 is my third, but I've always thought it looked, well, drawn. Unreal. No, 5 is my final vote. It is striking at both low and high resolution, and the image detail is awesome. It makes me want to go north even though I've had enough of the damned snow already. diff Jobjörn (Talk ° contribs) 01:37, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
1 - very difficult to choose the most beautiful... --Rohieb 01:47, 17 February 2007 (UTC) ~~diff Please link to a diff on your home wiki -- Bryan (talk to me) 15:11, 17 February 2007 (UTC)~~ new diff: diff --Rohieb 16:21, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
5 - Tough choice, especially since non of my nominations made it to the final. :/ --LasseG 02:14, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
6 - That was a really choice, but I prefer it ever so slightly to 5, if only because it was taken by a Wikimedian. I really like it a lot, this is an amazing picture. (diff) --Dylan Lake 04:08, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
8 - Or 7... Can I do half votes? If I can I would have half to 7 and half to 8, but I do like 8 a bit more than 7. --Antilived 04:28, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
11 - There are several excellent choices, to be sure, but this one is the only one that is nearly flawless. An extraordinary photo. diff Jersyko 04:34, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
~~5 Dunning 05:10, 17 February 2007 (UTC)~~ Too few edits -- Bryan (talk to me) 18:38, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
7 yep, the lovely birdie! go on.--Mohamed Magdy 06:04, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
6 ~ trialsanderrors 06:21, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
6 --NeuCeu 08:50, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
7 - the little bit of ice on the beak is just the icing on the cake! --pfctdayelise (说什么?) 09:10, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
~~5 - l'aurore boréal est vraiment la plus belle. Alecs.y (disc. - contr.) 09:13, 17 February 2007 (UTC)~~ Declared invalid after voting closed; see talk page[reply]
6 High enough resolution, suberb composition, fascinating--Simonizer 09:21, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
6 Terence Ong 09:24, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
10 Fir0002, you're a great photographer. I like what you do. Beautiful picture. DeansFA 09:41, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
10 Has to be this one. Lycaon 09:49, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
2 Other pictures, except 9 and 11, are actually nothing special. --Derbeth ^talk 09:51, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
3 - Marcus Cyron 09:52, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
8 --Romary 10:04, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
9 - diff $pooky 10:10, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
5 --Ultratomio 10:18, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
8 --Hans Koberger 10:48, 17 February 2007 (UTC) (diff) ~~Too few edits -- Bryan (talk to me) 18:38, 18 February 2007 (UTC)~~[reply]
2 --Nono365 12:27, 17 February 2007 (UTC) (diff)[reply]
3 --Schwalbe 12:35, 17 February 2007 (UTC) (de-contribs) in memorium of the far too early death of the author DDL.[reply]
4 As the most interesting. --ajvol 12:46, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
2 first, 9 second. Barcex 12:56, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
7 Extraordinarily beautiful. It was so hard to chose between 7 and 8! --Pharaoh Hound 12:59, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
6 -- Lerdsuwa 13:47, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
~~2 -- Ouicoude --82.123.101.58 14:05, 17 February 2007 (UTC) diff~~ Sorry, invalid diff. Please take the other diffs as example. -- Bryan (talk to me) 15:10, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
7 --MiPe 14:09, 17 February 2007 (UTC) diff[reply]
11 5 and 9 isn't that good as I thought, and the quality isn't good in largest size. So it's between the 11th and 10th picture. //moralist 14:26, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
11 diff IanManka 14:49, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
~~7 Fantastic ! 82.125.88.155 14:51, 17 February 2007 (UTC)~~ Please add a diff to your vote to confirm your identity -- Bryan (talk to me) 15:10, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
8 --che 15:29, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
~~5 --Mike bzh 16:25, 17 February 2007 (UTC)~~ < 100 Commons edits; read the instructions pfctdayelise (说什么?) 06:37, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
5 --Klemen Kocjančič (Pogovor - Quick response) 17:03, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
5 -- Muro de Aguas ( Write me) 17:15, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
10 Encyclopedic. Diff. -- Jeandré, 2007-02-17t17:19z
10 Chabacano 17:26, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
11 --Kintup 17:36, 17 February 2007 (UTC) less than 100 commons edits. please re-read the instructions. pfctdayelise (说什么?) 06:44, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
diff --kintup 14:13, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
11 (diff) Noclip 17:38, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
2 Mikm 17:38, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
1 Weil ich schon mal dort war und ihn selbst erlebt habe... Monsterxxl 17:41, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
8 Lourdes 17:47, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
~~9 Kerowyn 17:52, 17 February 2007 (UTC)~~ < 100 commons edits; please re-read the instructions pfctdayelise (说什么?) 06:48, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
~~11 - amazing shot, very difficult to obtain, timeless. diff tiZom_(2¢) 18:11, 17 February 2007 (UTC)~~ the diff needs to be from the account where you have 100 edits, not commons! pfctdayelise (说什么?) 06:51, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
9 — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 18:17, 17 February 2007 (UTC) (diff)[reply]
~~10 - An incredible picture, great detail, and I bet it was hard to take. By far the best picture here in my opinion. Vertigo2008 18:54, 17 February 2007 (UTC)~~ Too few edits -- Bryan (talk to me) 18:38, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
1 At first sight looks like something from space opera diff KonstKaras 19:00, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
9 Er Komandante (messages) 19:10, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
6 It is technically maybe not the most perfect. But it has a great atmosphere... --AngMoKio 19:14, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
5 A picture like this is not easy to take! Vmenkov 19:14, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
9 Great shot. --tomf688 (talk - email) 20:19, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
11 These are all great pictures, no 11 would be my favourite. --Matt314 20:35, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
2 but it's really hard to choose! --Cruccone 20:48, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
7 because it's so hard to catch them. fantastic. --Nina 21:35, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
9 original--Parisette 21:42, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
8 Snowwayout 21:47, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
6 --Trounce 21:56, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
2 Jtico 22:00, 17 February 2007 (UTC) dif[reply]
10 Just a beautiful picture. --Joelmills 23:52, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
10 --qvvx 00:06, 18 February 2007 (UTC) (diffs: ruwiki → metawiki metawiki → commonswiki)[reply]
2 -- I wish I knew more about him. diff Jeremy Tobacman 01:18, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
3 Genial Diff --Leonudio 01:37, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
9 Pretty cool image --Emx 01:50, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
8 Owls are such lovely birds. I find this photo very soothing. Arria Belli | parlami 01:54, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
8 Ganz, ganz knapp vor 7. Beide unspektakulär, aber präzise fotografiert mit wunderbar zurückhaltenden, natürlichen Farben, hoher enzyklopädischer Relevanz, Schärfeverlauf perfekt. -- smial 02:35, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
4 -- taking a bunch of PD images and making an informative PD animation out of it is truly inspiring. --SB_Johnny|^talk|_books 02:38, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
~~5 -- Between 5 and 11 5 would have to be my favourite by just a small amount. Harry~~ Please provide a diff -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:22, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
2 Chick Bowen 03:43, 18 February 2007 (UTC) diff.[reply]
9 number 6 is a very close second.--69.225.87.189 03:58, 18 February 2007 (UTC) diff[reply]
6 --JeremyA 04:05, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
11 - can't even begin to think how this was done - Jack · talk · 04:10, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
~~2 -~~74.130.49.99 04:13, 18 February 2007 (UTC)~~ Martinman11 04:15, 18 February 2007 (UTC)~~ Please provide a diff -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:32, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
5 --I've seen this from the cockpit window of a 747 over Hudson's Bay--spectacular!Lmcelhiney 04:30, 18 February 2007 (UTC) diff[reply]
~~5 - Pretty pic. --24.16.255.168 04:34, 18 February 2007 (UTC)~~ Please provide a diff -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:32, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
4 - Talented creator, smooth animation, incredibly beautiful and fascinating --Iamunknown 05:13, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
8 - AuburnPilot 05:22, 18 February 2007 (UTC) (en.Wiki)[reply]
2 - No contest. yes it's black and white, but the subject is really good. Verdy p 05:31, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
6. Very beautiful image. --Carioca 05:35, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
7 My favorite in commons. --Nerval 06:05, 18 February 2007 (UTC) (diff)[reply]
11 --Winterheart 06:45, 18 February 2007 (UTC) (diff Please provide a diff -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:32, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
~~9 All so good --71.108.126.121 06:48, 18 February 2007 (UTC)~~ Please provide a diff -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:32, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
3 Truly original. The shadows on the book are incredible. (diff)—Emote 06:52, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
2 — Probably the most informative, and certainly one of the best-composed pictures on the Commons. — coelacan — 07:22, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
7 The clarity even at the highest zoom level is just astonishing. Blahedo 07:25, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
11 I voted for this one in its original Featured Picture nomination and I still think it is one of the best pictures I have ever seen. Valley2city 07:38, 18 February 2007 (UTC) diff[reply]
~~4 Beautiful picture, great educational value. Must have taken lots of time & patience to create. -- 84.24.161.82 07:41, 18 February 2007 (UTC)~~ Please provide a diff -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:32, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
~~2 --Kaosrimo 08:05, 18 February 2007 (UTC)~~ Please provide a valid diff -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:37, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
1 - Very pretty. I'm using it as my wallpaper. --AAA! 08:38, 18 February 2007 (UTC) (diff)[reply]
9 Rasbak 08:50, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
4 diff --196.202.91.131 08:57, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
*2 - Zodiiak diff : This pictures delivers a powerful story with no words...it's captivated me in so many ways Please provide a valid diff -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:01, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

1 – This is not a flower? --Packa 09:10, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

~~1 - I can't believe an airport could be that nice. – OCNative 09:27, 18 February 2007 (UTC)~~ Please provide a valid diff -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:37, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

~~5 - Better that a picture of an sweaty tramp with a shopping trolley 203.49.185.184 10:08, 18 February 2007 (UTC)~~ Please provide a valid diff -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:37, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3 - Gr8, that's it...--StaraBlazkova 10:24, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

7 - Beautiful, inspiring, perfect Fg2 10:28, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

7 - That's the one. Alaexis 10:35, 18 February 2007 (UTC); diff[reply]

3 -- Pseudomoi (to chat on WP) 10:50, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

8 - The owl for knowledge. --Malene Thyssen 10:56, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

~~6 - An amazing photo but number 3 came close - User:Highfields on Wikipedia~~ Please provide a valid diff -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:37, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3 - de:Benutzer:Syrcro (diff)

3 - Great original work. Other images are excellent as well. - diff Utcursch 11:39, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]