Wikimedia Commons

Commons:Návrhy na nejlepší obrázky

Shortcut
This project page in other languages:


Formální záležitosti

edit

Nominace

edit

Jestliže jste přesvědčeni, že některý obrázek nahraný na Commons má hodnotu, která by ho opravňovala k zařazení mezi nejlepší obrázky, potom ho prosím přidejte. Můžete navrhnout obrázek, jehož jste autorem, ale i obrázek od kohokoli jiného. Předtím, než obrázek nominujete, zkontrolujte, že je řádně popsán a opatřen správnou licencí.

1) zkopírujte název obrázku do tohoto pole, například: Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Váš obrázek.jpg. Potom klikněte na tlačítko "vytvořit novou nominaci".

2) postupujte podle pokynů na stránce
3) ručně vložite odkaz na vytvořenou stránku nahoru na Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: klikněte zde, a přidejte následující řádek na začátek seznamu nominací: {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Váš obrázek.jpg}}

Hlasování

edit

Prosím hlasujte použitím příslušného slova ve vaší řeči či použitím šablon uvedených níže:

  • Pro - Yes, Sim, Ja, Oui, Sí, Kyllä, 支持, Ano...
  • Proti - No, Não, Nein, Non, Ei, 反对, Ne...

Alternativně můžete použít šablony {{Oppose}}(  Oppose) a {{Support}}(  Support). Své sympatie k obrázku můžete vyjádřit pomocí šablony {{I love}}(   Support) a svůj neutrální postoj pomocí šablony {{Neutral}}(  Neutral).

Zkuste přidat pár slov o tom, proč se vám obrázek líbí nebo nelíbí, obzvláště pokud hlasujete proti.

Pravidla pro výběr nejlepších obrázků

edit
  • 14denní hlasovací období. Výsledek hlasování bude vyhodnocen 15. den po nominaci.
  • Jsou vítány i nominace od anonymních příspěvatelů.
  • Příspěvky do diskuse od anonymních příspěvatelů jsou vítány.
  • Hlasy anonymních přispěvatelů se nepočítají.
  • Nominace se nepočítá jako hlasování. Podpora musí být výslovně vyjádřena.
  • Mějte na paměti, že Wikimedia Commons má sloužit jako centrální úložiště svobodných obrázků, které mohou být využity všemi projekty Wikimedia, včetně možných budoucích projektů. Nejde pouze o sbírku obrázků pro wikipedii, navržené obrázky by tedy neměly být posuzovány z hlediska jejich vhodnosti pro tento projekt.

Navržený obrázek bude zařazen na seznam nejlepších obrázků, pokud splní následující podmínky:

  • Odpovídající licence (to je samozřejmé)
  • Nejméně 5 hlasů na jeho podporu
  • Poměr hlasů pro/proti přinejmenším 2:1 (dvoutřetinová většina, tj. přinejmenším 67 % hlasů pro)

Návod na zpracování starých nominací je na stránce Template talk:Featured pictures candidates#What to do after voting is finished.

Kandidáti na vyřazení ze seznamu nejlepších obrázků

edit

Požadavky na nejlepší obrázky se postupně vyvíjejí. Můžeme dojít k závěru, že některé obrázky, které byly původně "dost dobré", už nevyhovují současným požadavkům.

Zde můžete uvést obrázky, které si podle vás už nezaslouží patřit mezi nejlepší obrázky. Pro vyřazení je třeba 2/3 většina hlasů a minimálně 5 hlasů pro vyřazení. V opačném případě obrázek zůstane zařazen mezi nejlepšími obrázky. Hlasujte pomocí šablon {{Keep}}   Keep (zasluhuje si i nadále být mezi nejlepšími obrázky) nebo {{Delist}}   Delist (měl by být ze seznamu vyřazen). Uveďte prosím odkaz na původní nominaci mezi nejlepší obrázky (ta je uvedena na stránce s popiskem obrázku). Jinak platí stejná pravidla jako při hlasování o kandidátech na nejlepší obrázky.

Pro návrh obrázku na vyřazení ze seznamu nejlepších obrázků prosím použijte následující šablonu, kde v řádku za předdefinovaný zápis, za dvojtečku doplňte název obrázku nominovaného k vyřazení:



Nová stránka návrhu na vyřazení by měla obsahovat:

  • Informace o původu obrázku (autor, kdo jej náhrál, případně odkud byl obrázek převzat).
  • Odkaz na záznam nominace / hlasování (je uveden na stránce obrázku).
  • Důvod návrhu vyřazení.

Po tomto je nutno ručně vložit odkaz nahoru na stránku Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal.

Obrázky navržené za nejlepší obrázky

edit
edit

File:Байкальский вид амфипод Brandtia latissima latior (Dybowsky, 1974) и голарктический вид амфипод Gammarus lacustris Sars, 1863.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 31 Dec 2024 at 20:41:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Vitino, RT-70 deep space radio telescope (planetary radar), Antenna, Crimea.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 31 Dec 2024 at 20:25:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Сончеви плочи кај Врсаково.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 31 Dec 2024 at 19:12:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:المنزل.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 31 Dec 2024 at 11:42:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Pine Valley Mountains.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 31 Dec 2024 at 00:00:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Vancouver, North Vancouver, North Shore Mountains.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 31 Dec 2024 at 00:00:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Andean motmot (Momotus aequatorialis aequatorialis) Las Tangaras.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 30 Dec 2024 at 19:17:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Vy från Vadvevaras 02.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 30 Dec 2024 at 14:18:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  • Zquid, for me the issues with this one are the lack of detail at full size - look at how 'smudgy' the fine detail looks at pixel level when you compare e.g. this where you can see even the individual cracks in the ice really clearly - plus the big area of overexposed ('blown') highlights in the cloud on the top right. I also think the contrast has been turned up too high so the mix of light and shadow does not look natural. Cmao20 (talk) 12:40, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Portrait of a red fox in Rautas fjällurskog.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 30 Dec 2024 at 13:55:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Sammallooma ellujäämiskapsel (Cristatella mucedo).jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 30 Dec 2024 at 13:15:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Jutro iznad Avale.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 30 Dec 2024 at 12:18:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Црква Светог Марка у Булевару у предвечерје.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 30 Dec 2024 at 10:12:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  •   Oppose The illuminated central window is a retouch, affecting the image quality. Additionally, there is noticeable noise in the photo.--IrksomeBuccaneer2635 (talk) 18:03, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Comment We should not accept images modified in this way at FPC without disclosure. Surprised that the judges of WLM Serbia didn't spotted this. Mile should tell them. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:09, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • The more I look at the image, the more I notice major and obvious editing flaws, especially around the building in the foreground.
    IrksomeBuccaneer2635 (talk) 22:11, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    This is link to RAW FILE:
    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/d/db/20241222140511!Црква_Светог_Марка_у_Булевару_у_предвечерје.jpg
    This photo was taken with a telephoto lens. 1/400 f/5,6 ISO1600 (this was on automatic mode). It was edited in Lightroom, and given that I'm an amateur, the editing wasn't precise (hallo efects ...). First I removed the noise. Then I cropped and removed unwanted objects (the crane was especially bothered me). Finally, I dealt with the aesthetic adjustments. I spent the most time trying to get the exact tone of the object. Yes, my masks are not perfect (unfortunately, I don't know how to use Photoshop), but I didn't insert any windows or entire object!? I really don't know why the lights aren't visible on the other windows either. There are no partition walls inside the object. I think the answer is in the spotlights that are directed at exactly those, illuminated windows. Let me repeat: I didn't insert any windows! The remark about the different sharpness may be because I edited the object separately and everything else separately. I don't know how else to explain this. To conclude. The object itself is so edited to look exactly the way I've seen it for 60 years. That's incredibly important to me, and I think I succeeded in that. Thank you all for your attention. Mikon2908 (talk) 15:13, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Support JukoFF (talk) 22:15, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Comment @ Charlesjsharp, Cmao20, IrksomeBuccaneer2635 Thanx for notting. I didnt check them, since they were in Podium - this was Winner. I will notify them on Serbian Wiki. Ping for Vulcan, JukoFF. I agree window in bottom is fake. For that above not so sure, could be reflextion. But in bottom, if one is lighted, why 2 others arent and its not under reflextion anymore. When i check church, i think its Fill-in. I see back is more in focus and church. Author didnt cover nice...i noted some spots. --Mile (talk) 09:19, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Please read my comment posted a little further so I don't repeat myself. Thank you. Mikon2908 (talk) 15:17, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Oppose --Mile (talk) 09:19, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Oppose Vulcan changing vote based on other editors' observation. –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 09:53, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Comment @Mikon2908 "I spent the most time trying to get the exact tone of the object" i think your processing went to far compared to original. Especially bottom enlighted window, where pixels are too obvious. Hard to achieve FP with such mistakes, problem is also a rule "Digital manipulations must not deceive the viewer. Correcting flaws, some color adjustments, and other minor edits are acceptable." which will be taken in aspect for 2024 WLM Serbia. --Mile (talk) 17:44, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pink whipray (Pateobatis fai) Moorea.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 30 Dec 2024 at 09:33:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Црква „Св. Петка“ - Ново Лагово 6.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 30 Dec 2024 at 00:47:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Cuerno de Oro, Estambul, Turquía, 2024-09-28, DD 141-143 HDR.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 29 Dec 2024 at 22:31:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  • What a phenomenon :-) Sorry, in the darkness I did not distinguish the fishing rods above, at first sight. And since it's a long exposure, the aspect of these lines looks a bit special, like a kind of stitching issue. Thanks for the notification -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:22, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Red-necked grebe (Podiceps grisegena grisegena) breeding adult Gronjordssoen.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 29 Dec 2024 at 22:06:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Wetterspitzen (Stubaier Alpen).jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 29 Dec 2024 at 17:51:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Црква „Св. Никола“ - Манастир.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 29 Dec 2024 at 13:27:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Ambigram Motel Water.png

edit

Voting period ends on 29 Dec 2024 at 05:24:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Carriers of the New Black Plague.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 28 Dec 2024 at 22:14:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:1007 Graslei, Clock tower of the Post Office, Church of Saint-Nicolas in Ghent and Belfry of Ghent Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 28 Dec 2024 at 21:07:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Dans tous les ciels, Air France affiche, R. de Valerio.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 28 Dec 2024 at 09:13:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Hydrangea macrophylla in front of Seongsan Ilchulbong volcano at blue hour in Jeju Island South Korea.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 28 Dec 2024 at 06:34:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Road in Mongolia aimak Bayan Ulgiy 02.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 27 Dec 2024 at 18:07:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Église Saint-Louis-de-Kamouraska 2023.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 27 Dec 2024 at 14:56:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Sophia Loren 62 Allan Warren.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 27 Dec 2024 at 11:41:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Schwetzingen - Schlossgarten - Blick aus dem Naturtheater zum Apollotempel mit Sphingen 2.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 27 Dec 2024 at 11:38:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Granite boulder formations near the Monsanto Castle at sunrise, Aldeia de Monsanto, Portugal (2) julesvernex2-3.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 27 Dec 2024 at 11:07:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
Time of day
  •   Comment Thank you for the nomination, Aristeas! I’m afraid though I fumbled the description and filename, as this image was taken at sunrise, not sunset… I assume it’s easier to change the filename after the nomination runs its course? It was a beautiful but very cold morning, I remember having to hike down the hill holding the camera and tripod, as my hands were too stiff too unzip the backpack :) —Julesvernex2 (talk) 17:45, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      Comment Such things just happen … Thank you for the correction, Julesvernex2! Yes, normally it’s easier to change the filename later, but to avoid any possible further confusion I have taken the liberty to rename both your image and this nomination right now (I hope I got all links right, too). – Aristeas (talk) 17:55, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Awesome, thank you very much! Julesvernex2 (talk) 18:00, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bathtubs - Caux 01.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 27 Dec 2024 at 09:23:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:St Maurice church in St-Maurice Nievre(19).jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 27 Dec 2024 at 06:31:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:2011 Peugeot 908 Donington Park 2023 01.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 26 Dec 2024 at 21:46:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  • 1 Great panning effect, but the tilt gives the impression the car is going up a hill. I will support this nomination if it is fixed. As the camera sensor is capable of more pixels, I assume the picture was cropped on both sizes? -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:18, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I genuinely don't know how accurate the tilt is, Donington park is reasonably hilly there but I think it's probably at least exaggerated. I personally like it to make it feel dynamic, but it might not be preferable for encyclopedic purposes. Because, as you say, I have plenty of space to straighten it in the crop, so I will add a straight version as an alternative. — Julian H.✈ 07:45, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

edit

 
edit

Voting period ends on 26 Dec 2024 at 09:37:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 21:33, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Estrella de mar de espinas rojas (Protoreaster linckii), Zanzíbar, Tanzania, 2024-06-01, DD 06.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 26 Dec 2024 at 05:58:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Amphitheatre (Alba Fucens).jpg (delist)

edit

Voting period ends on 26 Dec 2024 at 00:13:00
 

  1. Because I believe we should not offer this "honor" to a user who escapes their ban. The image should not become a POTD, nor decorate our galleries, and it's better if re-uses are limited.
  2. Like GRDN711 on the original nomination I agree the picture has a rather low wow factor. During the discussion on the FPC talk page, I was wondering if this photo had a chance to become a POTY finalist, and honestly believe not, because of the harsh light and strong shadows. Of course my subjective guess can be wrong, but in that case, it is another reason to delist, because the photo uploaded by a supposedly blocked user should definitely not enter the "Picture of the Year" competition to get such a reward.
Sorry for all those who liked this picture, and especially Cmao20 the impeccable nominator who suggested this photo in good faith and now finds himself a bit tarnished by the scandal. It's just bad luck.
Thanks, Radomianin, for the initiative -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:16, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I do feel like 'it's not a good enough photo to be FP' is probably not a fair reason to delist in this case, honestly. We should focus our discussion entirely on whether the photo should remain FP seeing it was taken by a banned sockpuppet user. The picture was only promoted a month ago and people had ample opportunity to vote on its quality at that time. Cmao20 (talk) 21:36, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Dear Cmao20, you're right and I completely understand your instasfaction to hear today negative opinions being expressed when they had previously kept quiet. However, you can also understand 2 things, in this new situation: 1) all the previously tangential opinions no longer hesitate to express their reservations (this is my case personally, who had not supported) and similarly some who had supported may simply abstain this second time (if they don't oppose), 2) there is sometimes a form of natural lottery in a panel of daily voters on FPC. It is not always the same ones who vote, and the score can change depending on the arguments and influences. Look at the FPs renominated last time, some scores turned out to be very different. Example 17 may 2021 : score 7-3, then 13 January 2022 : score 13-1. How do you explain that? Or even more: score 7-4 then score 11-0. So there is a bit of random. Best regards -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:06, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oh, I agree. The process is invariably a bit random and that’s unavoidable. And it’s not necessarily even a bad thing - it may result in some pictures failing that should probably have passed, and some passing that should have failed, but it averages out to the process generally working very well, and I do think we generally get a high standard of photos passing. I just think this delist request should be focussed on the matter of whether it’s appropriate to feature a photo uploaded by a sockpuppet. Wolverine XI had the opportunity to speak up as to the photo’s quality when it was initially nominated, and he didn’t. If we start re-evaluating the quality of images only a month after they were passed, I fear that the FP galleries would forever be in flux. Anyway, I think I’ll leave it here as I don’t feel inclined to defend Livio’s photos any longer. Cmao20 (talk) 04:15, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Perhaps "not on par" has no relation with "quality"? "Not on par with the rest of the FPs" possibly means that the rest of the FPs were uploaded by authorized users? Or because the rest of the FPs will be fair POTY candidates, legitimate POTD, etc.?
  •   Delist per nom.--Peulle (talk) 08:08, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Neutral Now this is a real dilemma. One the one hand I fully agree with Radomianin, Basile, et all. that we should not promote any further photos by Livioandronico2013/Paris Orlando/Σπάρτακος/Architas/Commonists/NikonZ7II/Merulana/PaestumPaestum/etc. etc. etc., according to the results of the discussion after the Commonists unmasking in 2021. On the other hand Cmao20 is absolutely right that this photo is kind of a special case, as it was neither nominated by Livio themselves nor did Livio even vote on it. IMHO we should not delist the image for quality/aesthetical reasons because these aspects have been fairly discussed in the original nomination just a month ago. Anybody can always open a regular ‘delist’ nomination, but normally this should be done only (a) for procedural/rule-related reasons – like here –, (b) when one discovers major flaws in a FP which were not mentioned in the original nomination discussion, or (c) after a fairly long period when our technical requirements have changed significantly. Delisting recently promoted FPs ‘on the fly’ would open a can of worms with arbitray ‘But I did not like that FP’ discussions and block FPC. But of course I am fine with a procedural demoting if the majority resolves to do so. In any case many thanks to A.Savin, Basile, Cmao20, Radomianin and all other participants for their commitment to settle this unpleasant affair! – Aristeas (talk) 10:19, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Comment I am sorry to have caused such an intense discussion with this nomination. Perhaps I should have waited a little longer until there were other suggestions on the FPC discussion page. I am also sorry that a recently successfully promoted photo is now the reason for a delisting. The Livioandronico2013 scandal happened long before I was active on Commons, but I noticed the Commonists affair and took the opportunity to read through all the discussion pages about how Livioandronico2013 got banned. Until then, I didn't even know what a sock puppet was. Since we all work in this forum with good and faithful intentions, I personally think it is very important not to give room to proven or obvious frauds. This affects not only the relationships between contributors, but also the policies of the Wikimedia Foundation. While such removals are unpleasant for everyone involved, they must be done. I would also like to echo Cmao20's and Aristeas' thoughts that the reason for this delisting nomination is entirely due to sockpuppet abuse. It has nothing to do with technical, compositional, or any other aspect of the photo in question. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 14:34, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Delist Sockpuppet saga aside, this is not even a QI to me. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:26, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Why? I am happy to see this picture be delisted but I’m genuinely surprised how much criticism of the technical aspects has taken place. Surely the bar for QI is sharp, well composed, and illustrates the subject clearly, I don’t see how it can fall short. As I say, fully happy to see it go, but it just surprises me how many people seem to think that nominating this in the first place was some egregious misstep on my part. Cmao20 (talk) 12:12, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gibson Beach, East view 20230218 1.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 25 Dec 2024 at 16:33:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  • I won’t quibble with the rest, as although the composition is very satisfying to me this is definitely a fair critique, but I can’t personally see any issues with sharpness. The image seems very sharp to me. Cmao20 (talk) 02:49, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Cmao20: Interestingly, I just viewed the photo on my phone rather than my laptop and it looks like a completely different image; sharper lines, more saturated colours in the sky and warmer tones on the sand/rocks (maybe something up with the colour space?). Anyway, happy to strike out the comment about sharpness. BigDom (talk) 14:44, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:FDR 1944 Color Portrait (cropped)(b).jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2024 at 22:41:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

*  Comment Wcamp9, redirecting the file link to the uncropped version seems to have broken the nomination. I believe the right way to do this is to offer the uncropped version as an Alternative. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 18:37, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Link is restored. The uncropped version can still be added to this nomination as an Alternative. I've taken the liberty to do so since Wcamp9 is new to FPC and doesn't know how the nom system works (you can't go about changing the code in the nom, unless you know exactly what you're doing). Please revert if you don't like it. --Cart (talk) 19:32, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

edit

 

File:Lone Mountain Sunset (32727260230).jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2024 at 15:06:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Riyadh Skyline.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2024 at 00:47:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:S-charl, Clemgia zijrivier van de Inn. 12-10-2024. (d.j.b) 03.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2024 at 05:28:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:The Kaaba during Hajj.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2024 at 00:43:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

Alternative

edit

 

@Terragio67, SHB2000 2804:1B3:9700:3654:581C:C75E:C6F:7614 13:34, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dear IP, please log in or create an account to be allowed to send notifications -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:00, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's me Aliphotography (talk) 13:10, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2024 at 19:50:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
@Giles Laurent: You have cleaned up the technical denoising issue and it is now a quality image. I would certainly be happy if it were mine. However, IMHO, it still doesn't have the wow of others in the FP gallery. Now that you are intrigued by the aurora borealis, this might prompt travel back to Iceland's Ring Road, Northern Canada or Norway to look for more. The aurora appears like mysterious magic across the sky. --GRDN711 (talk) 01:38, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Taking a picture of the aurora is not something that you do by simply going to a place and taking a picture. You need the right conditions which you have no power at. The aurora don't happen constantly and you need one to be happening. You also need good weather, which is something extremely rare in Iceland. I spent 2 weeks in the winter period there and there was 100% cloud coverage 98% of the time. And with clouds in front of it, there's nothing to be seen. That night was the only night that I got to see an aurora. I also know a few people that went in search of auroras in other countries like Canada or Norway and that ended up seeing nothing. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:18, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:32, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural_phenomena#Aurora
edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2024 at 17:20:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  Support IrksomeBuccaneer2635 (talk) 20:57, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 21:31, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Návrhy_na_nejlepší_obrázky&oldid=102938346"