Commons:Kocsmafal/Archive4

Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees elections 2015

This is a message from the 2015 Wikimedia Foundation Elections Committee. Translations are available.

Voting has begun for eligible voters in the 2015 elections for the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees. Questions and discussion with the candidates for the Board will continue during the voting.

The Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees is the ultimate governing authority of the Wikimedia Foundation, a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization registered in the United States. The Wikimedia Foundation manages many diverse projects such as Wikipedia and Commons.

The voting phase lasts from 00:00 UTC May 17 to 23:59 UTC May 31. Click here to vote. More information on the candidates and the elections can be found on the 2015 Board election page on Meta-Wiki.

On behalf of the Elections Committee,
-Gregory Varnum (User:Varnent)
Volunteer Coordinator, 2015 Wikimedia Foundation Elections Committee

Posted by the MediaWiki message delivery 17:20, 17 May 2015 (UTC) • Translate • Get help

Pywikibot compat will no longer be supported - Please migrate to pywikibot core

Sorry for English, I hope someone translates this.
Pywikibot (then "Pywikipediabot") was started back in 2002. In 2007 a new branch (formerly known as "rewrite", now called "core") was started from scratch using the MediaWiki API. The developers of Pywikibot have decided to stop supporting the compat version of Pywikibot due to bad performance and architectural errors that make it hard to update, compared to core. If you are using pywikibot compat it is likely your code will break due to upcoming MediaWiki API changes (e.g. T101524). It is highly recommended you migrate to the core framework. There is a migration guide, and please contact us if you have any problem.

There is an upcoming MediaWiki API breaking change that compat will not be updated for. If your bot's name is in this list, your bot will most likely break.

Thank you,
The Pywikibot development team, 19:30, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Category:Imre Révész (painter)

Sziasztok! Kell még rá a sablon? Több, mint 70 éve hunyt el. Tambo (talk) 08:07, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Természetesen nem, levettem. --Tacsipacsi (talk) 08:14, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Köszönöm! Tambo (talk) 08:28, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

@Tambo and Tacsipacsi: Igazából csak a jövő év január 1-jétől válnak közkinccsé a művei, mivel 1945-ben halt meg, szóval javaslom hogy várjunk addig a további művei feltöltésével. ({{Közkincs-régi}}: „A hetvenéves védelmi időt a szerző halálát követő év első napjától […] kell számítani.”) Einstein2 (talk) 13:45, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Hát ezt benéztem (az elméletet tudom, csak valahogy nem találtam el a dolgot). Visszavonva. --Tacsipacsi (talk) 21:55, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

HTTPS

Hi everyone.

Over the last few years, the Wikimedia Foundation has been working towards enabling HTTPS by default for all users, including unregistered ones, for better privacy and security for both readers and editors. This has taken a long time, as there were different aspects to take into account. Our servers haven't been ready to handle it. The Wikimedia Foundation has had to balance sometimes conflicting goals.

Forced HTTPS has just been implemented on all Wikimedia projects. Some of you might already be aware of this, as a few Wikipedia language versions were converted to HTTPS last week and the then affected communities were notified.

Most of Wikimedia editors shouldn't be affected at all. If you edit as registered user, you've probably already had to log in through HTTPS. We'll keep an eye on this to make sure everything is working as it should. Do get in touch with us if you have any problems after this change or contact me if you have any other questions.

/Johan (WMF)

22:01, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Sablon:Az Aventinus nevezetességei

A következő sablonban szereplő szócikkekben (talán egy kivételével) az infoboxban egy kis katyvasz található. Pl. a Santi Bonifacio e Alessio-templomnál ez áll az infoboxban:

A Wikimédia Commons tartalmaz [[Commons:Category:Santi Bonifacio e Alessio (Rome)|Róma történelmi központja]] témájú médiaállományokat.

Mit lehetne tenni, hogy ne így nézzen ki? Talán az infobox címe (Róma történelmi központja) és a szócikk címe nem egyezik, ez lehet a gond? Kipróbáltam, hogy egyezzen a kettő, de ugyancsak ez a kavarodás jön ki. --Fmvh (talk) 22:31, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Ha nem lenne link a címben, az segítene. De azt hiszem, hogy a jelenlegi helyzet olyan bonyolult, hogy egyszerűbb egy wikicommons = - paramétert adni az infoboxnak és elhelyezni alatta egy sima commonskat sablont. --Tacsipacsi (talk) 22:40, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Igen, működik, köszönöm. Cserélem a többit is.--Fmvh (talk) 07:31, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Proposal to create PNG thumbnails of static GIF images

The thumbnail of this gif is of really bad quality.

How a PNG thumb of this GIF would look like

There is a proposal at the Commons Village Pump requesting feedback about the thumbnails of static GIF images: It states that static GIF files should have their thumbnails created in PNG. The advantages of PNG over GIF would be visible especially with GIF images using an alpha channel. (compare the thumbnails on the side)

This change would affect all wikis, so if you support/oppose or want to give general feedback/concerns, please post them to the proposal page. Thank you. --McZusatz (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:08, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

What does a Healthy Community look like to you?

Hi,
The Community Engagement department at the Wikimedia Foundation has launched a new learning campaign. The WMF wants to record community impressions about what makes a healthy online community. Share your views and/or create a drawing and take a chance to win a Wikimania 2016 scholarship! Join the WMF as we begin a conversation about Community Health. Contribute a drawing or answer the questions on the campaign's page.

Why get involved?

The world is changing. The way we relate to knowledge is transforming. As the next billion people come online, the Wikimedia movement is working to bring more users on the wiki projects. The way we interact and collaborate online are key to building sustainable projects. How accessible are Wikimedia projects to newcomers today? Are we helping each other learn?
Share your views on this matter that affects us all!
We invite everyone to take part in this learning campaign. Wikimedia Foundation will distribute one Wikimania Scholarship 2016 among those participants who are eligible.

More information

• All participants must have a registered user of at least one month antiquity on any Wikimedia project before the starting date of the campaign.
• All eligible contributions must be done until August 23, 2015 at 23:59 UTC
• Wiki link: Community Health learning campaign
• URL https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:Evaluation/Community_Health_learning_campaign
• Contact: María Cruz / Twitter: WikiEval #CommunityHealth / email: evalwikimedia · org

Happy editing!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:43, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

How can we improve Wikimedia grants to support you better?

My apologies for posting this message in English. Please help translate it if you can.

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation would like your feedback about how we can reimagine Wikimedia Foundation grants, to better support people and ideas in your Wikimedia project. Ways to participate:

• Respond to questions on the discussion page of the idea.
• Join a small group conversation.
• Learn more about this consultation.

Feedback is welcome in any language.

With thanks,

I JethroBT (WMF), Community Resources, Wikimedia Foundation.

(Opt-out Instructions) This message was sent by I JethroBT (WMF) through MediaWiki message delivery. 00:09, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Introducing the Wikimedia public policy site

Hi all,

We are excited to introduce a new Wikimedia Public Policy site. The site includes resources and position statements on access, copyright, censorship, intermediary liability, and privacy. The site explains how good public policy supports the Wikimedia projects, editors, and mission.

Visit the public policy portal: https://policy.wikimedia.org/

Please help translate the statements on Meta Wiki. You can read more on the Wikimedia blog.

Thanks,

Yana and Stephen (Talk) 18:13, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

(Sent with the Global message delivery system)

Open call for Individual Engagement Grants

My apologies for posting this message in English. Please help translate it if you can.

Greetings! The Individual Engagement Grants program is accepting proposals until September 29th to fund new tools, community-building processes, and other experimental ideas that enhance the work of Wikimedia volunteers. Whether you need a small or large amount of funds (up to $30,000 USD), Individual Engagement Grants can support you and your team’s project development time in addition to project expenses such as materials, travel, and rental space.

• Submit a grant request
• Get help with your proposal in IdeaLab or an upcoming Hangout session
• Learn from examples of completed Individual Engagement Grants

Thanks,

I JethroBT (WMF), Community Resources, Wikimedia Foundation. 20:53, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

(Opt-out Instructions) This message was sent by I JethroBT (WMF) (talk) through MediaWiki message delivery.

Only one week left for Individual Engagement Grant proposals!

(Apologies for using English below, please help translate if you are able.)

There is still one week left to submit Individual Engagement Grant (IEG) proposals before the September 29th deadline. If you have ideas for new tools, community-building processes, and other experimental projects that enhance the work of Wikimedia volunteers, start your proposal today! Please encourage others who have great ideas to apply as well. Support is available if you want help turning your idea into a grant request.

• Submit a grant request
• Get help with your proposal in IdeaLab
• Learn from examples of completed Individual Engagement Grants

I JethroBT (WMF), Community Resources 21:01, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Reimagining WMF grants report

(My apologies for using English here, please help translate if you are able.)

Last month, we asked for community feedback on a proposal to change the structure of WMF grant programs. Thanks to the 200 people who participated! A report on what we learned and changed based on this consultation is now available.

Come read about the findings and next steps as WMF’s Community Resources team begins to implement changes based on your feedback. Your questions and comments are welcome on the outcomes discussion page.

With thanks, I JethroBT (WMF) 16:56, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Damjanich Jánosné vs. Nagysándor József özvegye

Sziasztok! Szeretnék segítséget kérni. A magyar wikin jelezték erről a képről, hogy nem Damjanichnét ábrázolja; és valóban, a képen Schmidt Emma látható, Nagysándor József özvegye, a képet Barabás Miklós festette, ahogyan ezen a képen is látható. Az első kép a mult-kor.hu portálról származik, ezt jelzi is a képfájl leírása, azonban a mult-kor.hu portálon is helytelenül jelenik meg, hiszen ott olvasható, hogy Damjanich Jánosné látható a képen. Még az előtt kértem ennek a hibás leírású képnek az átnevezését, mielőtt tudomást szereztem volna arról, hogy a másik, a helyes információkkal rendelkező kép is létezik a Commonson. Ezt követően elgondolkodtam, hogy lehet, hogy inkább töröltetni kellene az első képet?: hiszen az átnevezéssel sem oldódik meg a probléma, hiszen a kép forrása mult-kor.hu, ahol továbbra is Damjanich Jánosnét vélik a képen látni. Lehet, hogy törlésre kellene jelölni a képet? Ilyent még nem csináltam a Commonson, így ha valóban az a jobb megoldás, hogy törlésre kell jelölni, akkor szeretnék megkérni valakit, hogy segítsen nekem ebben, illetve, hogy mire kell figyelnem a törlésre jelölésnél itt, a Commonson. Köszönettel: --Sphenodon (talk) 11:47, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Mint duplikátum, törlésre jelöltem. --Rlevente (talk) 11:54, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Köszönöm szépen! --Sphenodon (talk) 12:01, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Community Wishlist Survey

Hi everyone! Apologies for posting in English. Translations are very welcome.

The Community Tech team at the Wikimedia Foundation is focused on building improved curation and moderation tools for experienced Wikimedia contributors. We're now starting a Community Wishlist Survey to find the most useful projects that we can work on.

For phase 1 of the survey, we're inviting all active contributors to submit brief proposals, explaining the project that you'd like us to work on, and why it's important. Phase 1 will last for 2 weeks. In phase 2, we'll ask you to vote on the proposals. Afterwards, we'll analyze the top 10 proposals and create a prioritized wishlist.

While most of this process will be conducted in English, we're inviting people from any Wikimedia wiki to submit proposals. We'll also invite volunteer translators to help translate proposals into English.

Your proposal should include: the problem that you want to solve, who would benefit, and a proposed solution, if you have one. You can submit your proposal on the Community Wishlist Survey page, using the entry field and the big blue button. We will be accepting proposals for 2 weeks, ending on November 23.

We're looking forward to hearing your ideas!

Community Tech Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:57, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Wikimania 2016 scholarships ambassadors needed

Hello! Wikimania 2016 scholarships will soon be open; by the end of the week we'll form the committee and we need your help, see Scholarship committee for details.

If you want to carefully review nearly a thousand applications in January, you might be a perfect committee member. Otherwise, you can volunteer as "ambassador": you will observe all the committee activities, ensure that people from your language or project manage to apply for a scholarship, translate scholarship applications written in your language to English and so on. Ambassadors are allowed to ask for a scholarship, unlike committee members.

Wikimania 2016 scholarships subteam 10:47, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Your input requested on the proposed #FreeBassel banner campaign

This is a message regarding the proposed 2015 Free Bassel banner. Translations are available.

Hi everyone,

This is to inform all Wikimedia contributors that a straw poll seeking your involvement has just been started on Meta-Wiki.

As some of your might be aware, a small group of Wikimedia volunteers have proposed a banner campaign informing Wikipedia readers about the urgent situation of our fellow Wikipedian, open source software developer and Creative Commons activist, Bassel Khartabil. An exemplary banner and an explanatory page have now been prepared, and translated into about half a dozen languages by volunteer translators.

We are seeking your involvement to decide if the global Wikimedia community approves starting a banner campaign asking Wikipedia readers to call on the Syrian government to release Bassel from prison. We understand that a campaign like this would be unprecedented in Wikipedia's history, which is why we're seeking the widest possible consensus among the community.

Given Bassel's urgent situation and the resulting tight schedule, we ask everyone to get involved with the poll and the discussion to the widest possible extent, and to promote it among your communities as soon as possible.

(Apologies for writing in English; please kindly translate this message into your own language.)

Thank you for your participation!

Posted by the MediaWiki message delivery 21:47, 25 November 2015 (UTC) • Translate • Get help

Community Wishlist Survey

Hi everyone! Apologies for posting this in English. Translations are very welcome.

We're beginning the second part of the Community Tech team's Community Wishlist Survey, and we're inviting all active contributors to vote on the proposals that have been submitted.

Thanks to you and other Wikimedia contributors, 111 proposals were submitted to the team. We've split the proposals into categories, and now it's time to vote! You can vote for any proposal listed on the pages, using the {{Support}} tag. Feel free to add comments pro or con, but only support votes will be counted. The voting period will be 2 weeks, ending on December 14.

The proposals with the most support votes will be the team's top priority backlog to investigate and address. Thank you for participating, and we're looking forward to hearing what you think!

Community Tech via

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:38, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Get involved in Wikipedia 15!

This is a message from the Wikimedia Foundation. Translations are available.

As many of you know, January 15 is Wikipedia’s 15th Birthday!

People around the world are getting involved in the celebration and have started adding their events on Meta Page. While we are celebrating Wikipedia's birthday, we hope that all projects and affiliates will be able to utilize this celebration to raise awareness of our community's efforts.

Haven’t started planning? Don’t worry, there’s lots of ways to get involved. Here are some ideas:

• Join/host an event. We already have more than 80, and hope to have many more.
• Talk to local press. In the past 15 years, Wikipedia has accomplished extraordinary things. We’ve made a handy summary of milestones and encourage you to add your own. More resources, including a press release template and resources on working with the media, are also available.
• Design a Wikipedia 15 logo. In place of a single icon for Wikipedia 15, we’re making dozens. Add your own with something fun and representative of your community. Just use the visual guide so they share a common sensibility.
• Share a message on social media. Tell the world what Wikipedia means to you, and add #wikipedia15 to the post. We might re-tweet or share your message!

Everything is linked on the Wikipedia 15 Meta page. You’ll find a set of ten data visualization works that you can show at your events, and a list of all the Wikipedia 15 logos that community members have already designed.

If you have any questions, please contact Zachary McCune or Joe Sutherland.

Thanks and Happy nearly Wikipedia 15!
-The Wikimedia Foundation Communications team

Posted by the MediaWiki message delivery, 20:58, 18 December 2015 (UTC) • Please help translate to your language • Help center

csóka madár

szia! A csóka madár cikkét írom, de sajnos a négy alfajról nincs rendes kép. Szeretném a segítségeteket kérni, hogy a commons kocsmafalán angolul is leírhassam. Sajnos nem tudok jól angolul. Szajci ^pošta 17:23, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

2016 WMF Strategy consultation

Please help translate to your language

Hello, all.

The Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) has launched a consultation to help create and prioritize WMF strategy beginning July 2016 and for the 12 to 24 months thereafter. This consultation will be open, on Meta, from 18 January to 26 February, after which the Foundation will also use these ideas to help inform its Annual Plan. (More on our timeline can be found on that Meta page.)

Your input is welcome (and greatly desired) at the Meta discussion, 2016 Strategy/Community consultation.

Apologies for English, where this is posted on a non-English project. We thought it was more important to get the consultation translated as much as possible, and good headway has been made there in some languages. There is still much to do, however! We created m:2016 Strategy/Translations to try to help coordinate what needs translation and what progress is being made. :)

If you have questions, please reach out to me on my talk page or on the strategy consultation's talk page or by email to [email protected].

I hope you'll join us! Maggie Dennis via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:06, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Fortepan

Feltöltöttem két képet: File:Hungarian Bofors 29M 8 cm anti-aircraft gun.jpg és a File:40M Nimród.jpg amit szerzői jogok megsértése miatt töröltek. Jeleztetem a képek eredetét és kértem a visszaállításukat, de ezt User:Jameslwoodward sikeresen ellenezte. Indoklása az volt, hogy "Looking at the broad range of images on the site, I suspect strongly that while the site claims that they are all CC-BY-SA, in fact no one has curated them and determined the actual copyright status. However, there are a lot of images in Category:Images from Fortepan, so I could be wrong. Looking at the broad range of images on the site, I suspect strongly that while the site claims that they are all CC-BY-SA, in fact no one has curated them and determined the actual copyright status. However, there are a lot of images in Category:Images from Fortepan, so I could be wrong."

Ez valami vicc? Ha sok fajta kép van egy tárhelyen az gyanús? Vagy el kellene fogadni mindet, vagy egyet sem! Hogy lehet így indokolni valamit? Mi az hogy I suspect strongly? Tovább már nem is írom, mert felvési valaki nekem. --Sepultura (talk) 11:16, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

@Sepultura: Annyiban egyetértek Jameslwoodwarddal, hogy én sem értem, hogy hogyan lehet mindenre egyöntetűen CC-BY-SA licencet írni, miközben vannak ott olyan képek is például, amik épp fordított helyzetűek, azaz a védelmi idejük lejárt - és ez igenis gyanús: nem tudni mi alapján biggyesztik oda a képekre. Számos alkalommal csak az "adományozó" van feltüntetve és a kilométer hosszú felsorolásból (ami sokszor úgy néz ki, mintha a cég összes munkatársát sorolnák fel) ki sem lehet silabizálni, mégis honnan származik valójában a kép. A feltöltő felelőssége, hogy a licenc hitelességét ellenőrizze feltöltés előtt... Meg tudodo adni a fortepan-os linkjét ezeknek a képeknek? Megnézem, hátha tudok valamit tenni... Fauvirt (talk) 16:13, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

A Nimród-ot megtaláltam, mindjárt megírom Jameslwoodwardnak, hogy a kép készítője a Fortepan egyik adományozója, így teljes joggal feltételezhető, hogy az ő engedélyével helyezték a cc-by-sa licenc alá a képet. Fauvirt (talk) 16:19, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Megvan a másik is! A Bofors-nál is uaz a helyzet. :o) Fauvirt (talk) 16:22, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Open Call for Individual Engagement Grants

Please help translate to your language:

Greetings! The Individual Engagement Grants (IEG) program is accepting proposals until April 12th to fund new tools, research, outreach efforts, and other experiments that enhance the work of Wikimedia volunteers. Whether you need a small or large amount of funds (up to $30,000 USD), IEGs can support you and your team’s project development time in addition to project expenses such as materials, travel, and rental space.

• Submit a grant request or draft your proposal in IdeaLab
• Get help with your proposal in an upcoming Hangout session
• Learn from examples of completed Individual Engagement Grants

With thanks, I JethroBT (WMF) 15:47, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Server switch 2016

The Wikimedia Foundation will be testing its newest data center in Dallas. This will make sure Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia wikis can stay online even after a disaster. To make sure everything is working, the Wikimedia Technology department needs to conduct a planned test. This test will show whether they can reliably switch from one data center to the other. It requires many teams to prepare for the test and to be available to fix any unexpected problems.

They will switch all traffic to the new data center on Tuesday, 19 April.
On Thursday, 21 April, they will switch back to the primary data center.

Unfortunately, because of some limitations in MediaWiki, all editing must stop during those two switches. We apologize for this disruption, and we are working to minimize it in the future.

You will be able to read, but not edit, all wikis for a short period of time.

• You will not be able to edit for approximately 15 to 30 minutes on Tuesday, 19 April and Thursday, 21 April, starting at 14:00 UTC (15:00 BST, 16:00 CEST, 10:00 EDT, 07:00 PDT).

If you try to edit or save during these times, you will see an error message. We hope that no edits will be lost during these minutes, but we can't guarantee it. If you see the error message, then please wait until everything is back to normal. Then you should be able to save your edit. But, we recommend that you make a copy of your changes first, just in case.

Other effects:

• Background jobs will be slower and some may be dropped.

Red links might not be updated as quickly as normal. If you create an article that is already linked somewhere else, the link will stay red longer than usual. Some long-running scripts will have to be stopped.

• There will be a code freeze for the week of 18 April.

No non-essential code deployments will take place.

This test was originally planned to take place on March 22. April 19th and 21st are the new dates. You can read the schedule at wikitech.wikimedia.org. They will post any changes on that schedule. There will be more notifications about this. Please share this information with your community. /User:Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 21:07, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Figyelőlista

Sziasztok!

Van arra valami gyors módszer hogy egy kategória összes alkategóriáját és/vagy fájljait felvegyem a figyelőlistámra? --Rakás (talk) 06:27, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

PetScannel bármelyiket lehet. Például a Károlyi család alkategóriái. Az első fülön adhatod meg a kezdőkategóriát, a másodikon választhatod ki a névtereket. Sajnos az eredményt még nem lehet közvetlenül felhasználni, a legegyszerűbb megoldás, ha átmásolod Excelbe, majd a G oszlopban az =ÖSSZEFŰZ(D1; ":"; B1) függvénnyel előállítod a nyers figyelőlistádra beilleszthető változatot (nem probléma, ha valami már eleve rajta van). --Tacsipacsi (talk) 14:25, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Open call for Project Grants

Please help translate to your language:

Greetings! The Project Grants program is accepting proposals from July 1st to August 2nd to fund new tools, research, offline outreach (including editathon series, workshops, etc), online organizing (including contests), and other experiments that enhance the work of Wikimedia volunteers.

Whether you need a small or large amount of funds, Project Grants can support you and your team’s project development time in addition to project expenses such as materials, travel, and rental space.

• Submit a grant request or draft your proposal in IdeaLab
• Get help with your proposal in an upcoming Hangout session
• Learn from examples of completed Individual Engagement Grants or Project and Event Grants

Also accepting candidates to join the Project Grants Committee through July 15.

With thanks, I JethroBT (WMF) 15:25, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Török János (1843-1892) képet

Sziasztok!

Kérem, tud nekem segíteni igényes megjelenése a képről? Ez egy fotó jelent meg egy újságcikk 1892-ben. Köszönöm szépen. --Turbojet (talk) 06:12, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Here you can find: File:Török János 1892.jpg --Rlevente (talk) 14:11, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Thank you. --Turbojet (talk) 15:06, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Save/Publish

The Editing team is planning to change the name of the “Save page” button to “Publish page” and “Publish changes”. “Publish page” will be used when you create a new page. “Publish changes” will be used when you change an existing page. The names will be consistent in all editing environments.[1][2]

This change will probably happen during the week of 30 August 2016. The change will be announced in Tech News when it happens.

If you are fluent in a language other than English, please check the status of translations at translatewiki.net for “Publish page” and “Publish changes”.

The main reason for this change is to avoid confusion for new editors. Repeated user research studies with new editors have shown that some new editors believed that “Save page” would save a private copy of a new page in their accounts, rather than permanently publishing their changes on the web. It is important for this part of the user interface to be clear, since it is difficult to remove public information after it is published. We believe that the confusion caused by the “Save page” button increases the workload for experienced editors, who have to clean up the information that people unintentionally disclose, and report it to the functionaries and stewards to suppress it. Clarifying what the button does will reduce this problem.

Beyond that, the goal is to make all the wikis and languages more consistent, and some wikis made this change many years ago. The Legal team at the Wikimedia Foundation supports this change. Making the edit interface easier to understand will make it easier to handle licensing and privacy questions that may arise.

Any help pages or other basic documentation about how to edit pages will also need to be updated, on-wiki and elsewhere. On wiki pages, you can use the wikitext codes {{int:Publishpage}} and {{int:Publishchanges}} to display the new labels in the user's preferred language. For the language settings in your account preferences, these wikitext codes produce “Publish page” and “Publish changes”.

Please share this news with community members who teach new editors and with others who may be interested.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:02, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

RevisionSlider

From September 13th on, RevisionSlider will be available as a beta feature in your wiki. The RevisionSlider adds a slider view to the diff page, so that you can easily move between revisions. The feature fulfills a wish from the German Community’s Technical Wishlist. Everyone is invited to test the feature and we hope that it will serve you well in your work!

Birgit Müller (WMDE) 14:56, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Grants to improve your project

Please help translate to your language:

Greetings! The Project Grants program is currently accepting proposals for funding. There is just over a week left to submit before the October 11 deadline. If you have ideas for software, offline outreach, research, online community organizing, or other projects that enhance the work of Wikimedia volunteers, start your proposal today! Please encourage others who have great ideas to apply as well. Support is available if you want help turning your idea into a grant request.

• Submit a grant request
• Get help: In IdeaLab or an upcoming Hangout session
• Learn from examples of completed Individual Engagement Grants or Project and Event Grants

I JethroBT (WMF) (talk) 20:10, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Creative Commons 4.0

Hello! I'm writing from the Wikimedia Foundation to invite you to give your feedback on a proposed move from CC BY-SA 3.0 to a CC BY-SA 4.0 license across all Wikimedia projects. The consultation will run from October 5 to November 8, and we hope to receive a wide range of viewpoints and opinions. Please, if you are interested, take part in the discussion on Meta-Wiki.

Apologies that this message is only in English. This message can be read and translated in more languages here. Joe Sutherland (talk) 01:34, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Password reset

I apologise that this message is in English. ⧼Centralnotice-shared-help-translate⧽

We are having a problem with attackers taking over wiki accounts with privileged user rights (for example, admins, bureaucrats, oversighters, checkusers). It appears that this may be because of weak or reused passwords.

Community members are working along with members of multiple teams at the Wikimedia Foundation to address this issue.

In the meantime, we ask that everyone takes a look at the passwords they have chosen for their wiki accounts. If you know that you've chosen a weak password, or if you've chosen a password that you are using somewhere else, please change those passwords.

Select strong passwords – eight or more characters long, and containing letters, numbers, and punctuation. Joe Sutherland (talk) / MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:59, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Adding to the above section (Password reset)

Please accept my apologies - that first line should read "Help with translations!". Joe Sutherland (WMF) (talk) / MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Help test offline Wikipedia

Hello! The Reading team at the Foundation is looking to support readers who want to take articles offline to read and share later on their phones - a use case we learned about from deep research earlier this year. We’ve built a few prototypes and are looking for people who would be interested in testing them. If you’d like to learn more and give us feedback, check out the page on Meta! Joe Sutherland (WMF) (talk) 20:08, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

New way to edit wikitext

Summary: There's a new opt-in Beta Feature of a wikitext mode for the visual editor. Please go try it out.

We in the Wikimedia Foundation's Editing department are responsible for making editing better for all our editors, new and experienced alike. We've been slowly improving the visual editor based on feedback, user tests, and feature requests. However, that doesn't work for all our user needs: whether you need to edit a wikitext talk page, create a template, or fix some broken reference syntax, sometimes you need to use wikitext, and many experienced editors prefer it.

Consequently, we've planned a "wikitext mode" for the visual editor for a long time. It provides as much of the visual editor's features as possible, for those times that you need or want wikitext. It has the same user interface as the visual editor, including the same toolbar across the top with the same buttons. It provides access to the citoid service for formatting citations, integrated search options for inserting images, and the ability to add new templates in a simple dialog. Like in the visual editor, if you paste in formatted text copied from another page, then formatting (such as bolding) will automatically be converted into wikitext.

All wikis now have access to this mode as a Beta Feature. When enabled, it replaces your existing wikitext editor everywhere. If you don't like it, you can reverse this at any time by turning off the Beta Feature in your preferences. We don't want to surprise anyone, so it's strictly an opt-in-only Beta Feature. It won't switch on automatically for anyone, even if you have previously checked the box to "Automatically enable most beta features".

The new wikitext edit mode is based on the visual editor, so it requires JavaScript (as does the current wikitext editor). It doesn't work with gadgets that have only been designed for the older one (and vice versa), so some users will miss gadgets they find important. We're happy to work with gadget authors to help them update their code to work with both editors. We're not planning to get rid of the current main wikitext editor on desktop in the foreseeable future. We're also not going to remove the existing ability to edit plain wikitext without JavaScript. Finally, though it should go without saying, if you prefer to continue using the current wikitext editor, then you may so do.

This is an early version, and we'd love to know what you think so we can make it better. Please leave feedback about the new mode on the feedback page. You may write comments in any language. Thank you.

James Forrester (Product Manager, Editing department, Wikimedia Foundation) --19:32, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Azonos néven feltöltött képek szétszedegetése

Sziasztok! Az volna a kérdésem, hogy van lehetőség azonos néven (új változat címszó alatt), de valójában két önálló kép szétválasztására? Itt most a Vajáni hőerőmű képére gondolok konkrétan. --Rakás (talk) 12:00, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Van, de valószínűleg az a legegyszerűbb, ha a korábbi változatot magad feltöltöd újra, külön név alatt, és visszahivatkozol ott erre a képre (hogy jogszerűségét tudjad bizonyítani). Samat (talk) 13:12, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

@Samat: Köszi! Remélem így jó lesz. --Rakás (talk) 10:34, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Review of initial updates on Wikimedia movement strategy process

Note: Apologies for cross-posting and sending in English. Message is available for translation on Meta-Wiki.

The Wikimedia movement is beginning a movement-wide strategy discussion, a process which will run throughout 2017. For 15 years, Wikimedians have worked together to build the largest free knowledge resource in human history. During this time, we've grown from a small group of editors to a diverse network of editors, developers, affiliates, readers, donors, and partners. Today, we are more than a group of websites. We are a movement rooted in values and a powerful vision: all knowledge for all people. As a movement, we have an opportunity to decide where we go from here.

This movement strategy discussion will focus on the future of our movement: where we want to go together, and what we want to achieve. We hope to design an inclusive process that makes space for everyone: editors, community leaders, affiliates, developers, readers, donors, technology platforms, institutional partners, and people we have yet to reach. There will be multiple ways to participate including on-wiki, in private spaces, and in-person meetings. You are warmly invited to join and make your voice heard.

The immediate goal is to have a strategic direction by Wikimania 2017 to help frame a discussion on how we work together toward that strategic direction.

Regular updates are being sent to the Wikimedia-l mailing list, and posted on Meta-Wiki. Beginning with this message, monthly reviews of these updates will be sent to this page as well. Sign up to receive future announcements and monthly highlights of strategy updates on your user talk page.

Here is a review of the updates that have been sent so far:

• Update 1 on Wikimedia movement strategy process (15 December 2016)
  • Introduction to process and information about budget spending resolution to support it
• Update 2 on Wikimedia movement strategy process (23 December 2016)
  • Start of search for Lead Architect for movement strategy process
• Update 3 on Wikimedia movement strategy process (8 January 2017)
  • Plans for strategy sessions at upcoming Wikimedia Conference 2017
• Update 4 on Wikimedia movement strategy process (11 January 2017)
  • Introduction of williamsworks
• Update 5 on Wikimedia movement strategy process (2 February 2017)
  • The core movement strategy team, team tracks being developed, introduction of the Community Process Steering Committee, discussions at WikiIndaba conference 2017 and the Wikimedia movement affiliates executive directors gathering in Switzerland
• Update 6 on Wikimedia movement strategy process (10 February 2017)
  • Tracks A & B process prototypes and providing feedback, updates on development of all four Tracks

More information about the movement strategy is available on the Meta-Wiki 2017 Wikimedia movement strategy portal.

Posted by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation, 20:31, 15 February 2017 (UTC) • Please help translate to your language • Get help

Overview #2 of updates on Wikimedia movement strategy process

Note: Apologies for cross-posting and sending in English. This message is available for translation on Meta-Wiki.

As we mentioned last month, the Wikimedia movement is beginning a movement-wide strategy discussion, a process which will run throughout 2017. This movement strategy discussion will focus on the future of our movement: where we want to go together, and what we want to achieve.

Regular updates are being sent to the Wikimedia-l mailing list, and posted on Meta-Wiki. Each month, we are sending overviews of these updates to this page as well. Sign up to receive future announcements and monthly highlights of strategy updates on your user talk page.

Here is a overview of the updates that have been sent since our message last month:

• Update 7 on Wikimedia movement strategy process (16 February 2017)
  • Development of documentation for Tracks A & B
• Update 8 on Wikimedia movement strategy process (24 February 2017)
  • Introduction of Track Leads for all four audience tracks
• Update 9 on Wikimedia movement strategy process (2 March 2017)
  • Seeking feedback on documents being used to help facilitate upcoming community discussions

More information about the movement strategy is available on the Meta-Wiki 2017 Wikimedia movement strategy portal.

Posted by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation, 19:43, 9 March 2017 (UTC) • Please help translate to your language • Get help

We invite you to join the movement strategy conversation (now through April 15)

This message, "We invite you to join the movement strategy conversation (now through April 15)", was sent through multiple channels by Gregory Varnum on 15 and 16 of March 2017 to village pumps, affiliate talk pages, movement mailing lists, and MassMessage groups. A similar message was sent by Nicole Ebber to organized groups and their mailing lists on 15 of March 2017. This version of the message is available for translation and documentation purposes

Dear Wikimedians/Wikipedians:

Today we are starting a broad discussion to define Wikimedia's future role in the world and develop a collaborative strategy to fulfill that role. You are warmly invited to join the conversation.

There are many ways to participate, by joining an existing conversation or starting your own:

Track A (organized groups): Discussions with your affiliate, committee or other organized group (these are groups that support the Wikimedia movement).

Track B (individual contributors): On Meta or your local language or project wiki.

This is the first of three conversations, and it will run between now and April 15. The purpose of cycle 1 is to discuss the future of the movement and generate major themes around potential directions. What do we want to build or achieve together over the next 15 years?

We welcome you, as we create this conversation together, and look forward to broad and diverse participation from all parts of our movement.

• Find out more about the movement strategy process
• Learn more about volunteering to be a Discussion Coordinator

Sincerely,

Nicole Ebber (Track A Lead), Jaime Anstee (Track B Lead), & the engagement support teams

05:09, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Start of the 2017 Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees elections

Please accept our apologies for cross-posting this message. This message is available for translation on Meta-Wiki.

On behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation Elections Committee, I am pleased to announce that self-nominations are being accepted for the 2017 Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees Elections.

The Board of Trustees (Board) is the decision-making body that is ultimately responsible for the long-term sustainability of the Wikimedia Foundation, so we value wide input into its selection. More information about this role can be found on Meta-Wiki. Please read the letter from the Board of Trustees calling for candidates.

The candidacy submission phase will last from April 7 (00:00 UTC) to April 20 (23:59 UTC).

We will also be accepting questions to ask the candidates from April 7 to April 20. You can submit your questions on Meta-Wiki.

Once the questions submission period has ended on April 20, the Elections Committee will then collate the questions for the candidates to respond to beginning on April 21.

The goal of this process is to fill the three community-selected seats on the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees. The election results will be used by the Board itself to select its new members.

The full schedule for the Board elections is as follows. All dates are inclusive, that is, from the beginning of the first day (UTC) to the end of the last.

• April 7 (00:00 UTC) – April 20 (23:59 UTC) – Board nominations
• April 7 – April 20 – Board candidates questions submission period
• April 21 – April 30 – Board candidates answer questions
• May 1 – May 14 – Board voting period
• May 15–19 – Board vote checking
• May 20 – Board result announcement goal

In addition to the Board elections, we will also soon be holding elections for the following roles:

• Funds Dissemination Committee (FDC)
  • There are five positions being filled. More information about this election will be available on Meta-Wiki.

• Funds Dissemination Committee Ombudsperson (Ombuds)
  • One position is being filled. More information about this election will be available on Meta-Wiki.

Please note that this year the Board of Trustees elections will be held before the FDC and Ombuds elections. Candidates who are not elected to the Board are explicitly permitted and encouraged to submit themselves as candidates to the FDC or Ombuds positions after the results of the Board elections are announced.

More information on this year's elections can be found on Meta-Wiki. Any questions related to the election can be posted on the election talk page on Meta-Wiki, or sent to the election committee's mailing list, board-electionswikimedia.org.

On behalf of the Election Committee,
Katie Chan, Chair, Wikimedia Foundation Elections Committee
Joe Sutherland, Community Advocate, Wikimedia Foundation

Posted by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation Elections Committee, 03:36, 7 April 2017 (UTC) • Please help translate to your language • Get help

Read-only mode for 20 to 30 minutes on 19 April and 3 May

Read this message in another language • Please help translate to your language

The Wikimedia Foundation will be testing its secondary data center in Dallas. This will make sure that Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia wikis can stay online even after a disaster. To make sure everything is working, the Wikimedia Technology department needs to conduct a planned test. This test will show whether they can reliably switch from one data center to the other. It requires many teams to prepare for the test and to be available to fix any unexpected problems.

They will switch all traffic to the secondary data center on Wednesday, 19 April 2017. On Wednesday, 3 May 2017, they will switch back to the primary data center.

Unfortunately, because of some limitations in MediaWiki, all editing must stop during those two switches. We apologize for this disruption, and we are working to minimize it in the future.

You will be able to read, but not edit, all wikis for a short period of time.

• You will not be able to edit for approximately 20 to 30 minutes on Wednesday, 19 April and Wednesday, 3 May. The test will start at 14:00 UTC (15:00 BST, 16:00 CEST, 10:00 EDT, 07:00 PDT, 23:00 JST, and in New Zealand at 02:00 NZST on Thursday 20 April and Thursday 4 May).
• If you try to edit or save during these times, you will see an error message. We hope that no edits will be lost during these minutes, but we can't guarantee it. If you see the error message, then please wait until everything is back to normal. Then you should be able to save your edit. But, we recommend that you make a copy of your changes first, just in case.

Other effects:

• Background jobs will be slower and some may be dropped. Red links might not be updated as quickly as normal. If you create an article that is already linked somewhere else, the link will stay red longer than usual. Some long-running scripts will have to be stopped.
• There will be code freezes for the weeks of 17 April 2017 and 1 May 2017. Non-essential code deployments will not happen.

This project may be postponed if necessary. You can read the schedule at wikitech.wikimedia.org. Any changes will be announced in the schedule. There will be more notifications about this. Please share this information with your community. /User:Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:33, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Voting has begun in 2017 Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees elections

This is a message from the Wikimedia Foundation Elections Committee. Translations are available.

Voting has begun for eligible voters in the 2017 elections for the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees.

The Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees is the ultimate governing authority of the Wikimedia Foundation, a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization registered in the United States. The Wikimedia Foundation manages many diverse projects such as Wikipedia and Commons.

The voting phase lasts from 00:00 UTC May 1 to 23:59 UTC May 14. Click here to vote. More information on the candidates and the elections can be found on the 2017 Board of Trustees election page on Meta-Wiki.

On behalf of the Elections Committee,
Katie Chan, Chair, Wikimedia Foundation Elections Committee
Joe Sutherland, Community Advocate, Wikimedia Foundation

Posted by the MediaWiki message delivery • Translate • Get help

19:14, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Beta Feature Two Column Edit Conflict View

From May 9, the Two Column Edit Conflict View will be available as a beta feature on all wikis. The Two Column Edit Conflict View is a new interface for the edit conflict resolution page. It highlights differences between the editor's and the conflicting changes to make it easy to copy and paste pieces of the text and resolve the conflict. The feature fulfils a request for a more user-friendly edit conflict resolution from the German Community’s Technical Wishlist. Everyone is invited to test the feature and we hope that it will serve you well!

Birgit Müller (WMDE) 14:29, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

RevisionSlider

RevisionSlider will be available as a default feature for all users on all wikis from May 17. The RevisionSlider adds a slider view to the diff page so that you can easily move between revisions. The slider view is collapsed by default, and will load by clicking on it. It can also be turned off entirely in the user preferences. RevisionSlider has been a default feature on German, Arabic and Hebrew Wikipedia for 6 months and a beta feature on all wikis for 8 months. The feature fulfills a wish from the German Community’s Technical Wishlist. Thanks to everyone who tested RevisionSlider and gave valuable feedback to improve the feature! We hope that RevisionSlider will continue to serve you well in your work.

Birgit Müller (WMDE) 14:39, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Join the next cycle of Wikimedia movement strategy discussions (underway until June 12)

Message is available for translation on Meta-Wiki

The Wikimedia movement strategy core team and working groups have completed reviewing the more than 1800 thematic statements we received from the first discussion. They have identified 5 themes that were consistent across all the conversations - each with their own set of sub-themes. These are not the final themes, just an initial working draft of the core concepts.

You are invited to join the online and offline discussions taking place on these 5 themes. This round of discussions will take place between now and June 12th. You can discuss as many as you like; we ask you to participate in the ones that are most (or least) important to you.

Here are the five themes, each has a page on Meta-Wiki with more information about the theme and how to participate in that theme's discussion:

• Healthy, Inclusive Communities
• The Augmented Age
• A Truly Global Movement
• The Most Respected Source of Knowledge
• Engaging in the Knowledge Ecosystem

On the movement strategy portal on Meta-Wiki, you can find more information about each of these themes, their discussions, and how to participate.

Posted by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation • Please help translate to your language • Get help

21:08, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Start of the 2017 Wikimedia Foundation Funds Dissemination Committee elections

Translations of this message are available on Meta-Wiki.

On behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation Elections Committee, we are pleased to announce that self-nominations are being accepted for the 2017 Wikimedia Foundation Funds Dissemination Committee and Funds Dissemination Committee Ombudsperson elections. Please read the letter from the Wikimedia Foundation calling for candidates at on the 2017 Wikimedia Foundation elections portal.

Funds Dissemination Committee
The Funds Dissemination Committee (FDC) makes recommendations about how to allocate Wikimedia movement funds to eligible entities. There are five positions being filled. More information about this role can be found at the FDC elections page.

Funds Dissemination Committee Ombudsperson
The Funds Dissemination Committee Ombudsperson receives complaints and feedback about the FDC process, investigates complaints at the request of the Board of Trustees, and summarizes the investigations and feedback for the Board of Trustees on an annual basis. One position is being filled. More information about this role can be found at the FDC Ombudsperson elections page.

The candidacy submission phase will last until May 28 (23:59 UTC).

We will also be accepting questions to ask the candidates until May 28. You can submit your questions on Meta-Wiki. Once the questions submission period has ended on May 28, the Elections Committee will then collate the questions for the candidates to respond to.

The goal of this process is to fill the five community-selected seats on the Wikimedia Foundation Funds Dissemination Committee and the community-selected ombudsperson. The election results will be used by the Board itself to make the appointments.

The full schedule for the FDC elections is as follows. All dates are inclusive, that is, from the beginning of the first day (UTC) to the end of the last.

• May 15 (00:00 UTC) – May 28 (23:59 UTC) – Nominations
• May 15 – May 28 – Candidates questions submission period
• May 29 – June 2 – Candidates answer questions
• June 3 – June 11 – Voting period
• June 12–14 – Vote checking
• June 15 – Goal date for announcing election results

More information on this year's elections can be found at the 2017 Wikimedia Foundation elections portal.

Please feel free to post a note about the election on your project's village pump. Any questions related to the election can be posted on the talk page on Meta-Wiki, or sent to the election committee's mailing list, board-electionswikimedia.org.

On behalf of the Election Committee,
Katie Chan, Chair, Wikimedia Foundation Elections Committee
Joe Sutherland, Community Advocate, Wikimedia Foundation

Posted by the MediaWiki message delivery • Translate • Get help

21:05, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Accessible editing buttons

The MediaWiki developers have been slowly improving the accessibility of the user interface. The next step in this transition will change the appearance of some buttons and may break some outdated (non-updated or unmaintained) user scripts and gadgets.

You can see and use the old and new versions now. Most editors will only notice that some buttons are slightly larger and have different colors.

• Comparison of old and new styles
• 
  Buttons before the change
• 
  Buttons after the change

However, this change also affects some user scripts and gadgets. Unfortunately, some of them may not work well in the new system. If you maintain any user scripts or gadgets that are used for editing, please see mw:Contributors/Projects/Accessible editing buttons for information on how to test and fix your scripts. Outdated scripts can be tested and fixed now.

This change will probably reach this wiki on Monday, 20 August 2017. Please leave a note at mw:Talk:Contributors/Projects/Accessible editing buttons if you need help.

--Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 16:56, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Copyright help regarding File:Cikk..jpg

I want to show this artcal

--Gergely Nóra (talk) 15:19, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Kedves Gergely Nóra! Ez a magyar nyelvű kocsmafal, arra való, hogy magyarul beszéljünk meg dolgokat (még ha el is árasztják az angol nyelvű automatikus üzenetek), viszont kicsit bővebben ki kéne fejtened a problémádat ahhoz, hogy tudjunk segíteni rajta. --Tacsipacsi (talk) 19:39, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Changes to the global ban policy

Hello. Some changes to the community global ban policy have been proposed. Your comments are welcome at m:Requests for comment/Improvement of global ban policy. Please translate this message to your language, if needed. Cordially. Matiia (Matiia) 00:34, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

New print to pdf feature for mobile web readers

New print to pdf feature for mobile web readers

The Readers web team will be deploying a new feature this week to make it easier to download PDF versions of articles on the mobile website.

Providing better offline functionality was one of the highlighted areas from the research done by the New Readers team in Mexico, Nigeria, and India. The teams created a prototype for mobile PDFs which was evaluated by user research and community feedback. The prototype evaluation received positive feedback and results, so development continued.

For the initial deployment, the feature will be available to Google Chrome browsers on Android. Support for other mobile browsers to come in the future. For Chrome, the feature will use the native Android print functionality. Users can choose to download a webpage as a PDF. Mobile print styles will be used for these PDFs to ensure optimal readability for smaller screens.

The feature is available starting Wednesday, Nov 15. For more information, see the project page on MediaWiki.org.

Thank you!

CKoerner (WMF) (talk) 22:07, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Beragadt kategóriák

Sziasztok! A File:(Amiens) 13 avril 1915 Levajols bénit le M. Farman 426 de P. Descoings - Fonds Berthelé - 49Fi120.jpg, File:(Amiens. Avion biplan Voisin) - Fonds Berthelé - 49Fi198.jpg fájloknál (és még tucatnyinál) az 1915 in France és 1915 photographs be vannak 'ragadva' pedig az 1915 photographs of France kategória miatt ezeket el kellene távolítani. Tudna valaki segíteni ebben? Köszönettel. - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 11:41, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Törélésre jelölés, vagy jogsértőzés?

Sziasztok! A Commonson talán még sosem jelöltem semmit törlésre vagy jogsértőnek, így nem tudom mi az eljárás, de ráakadtam erre az oldalra, úgyhogy nagy baj nem lehet. :) Szerintem ez innen származik. A feltöltőnek írtam, hogy valami nem stimmel. Mi a teendő? Piraeus (talk) 21:54, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Szia @Piraeus: ! Úgy látom nem ezzel az egy feltöltésével van csak probléma... Special:ListFiles/Szegediaron... Itt van a leírás (angolul): Commons:Deletion_requests, magyarul: Commons:Törlési_irányelvek#Törlési_szavazás Fauvirt (talk) 09:08, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

észszerűtlen kategorizálás - File:Flower bed, red & white in Gyenesdiás, 2016 Hungary.jpg

user:Globetrotter19 a File:Flower bed, red & white in Gyenesdiás, 2016 Hungary.jpg kapcsán bekategorizálta a 71-es főútba, pedig nem derül ki, hogy tényleg ott készült-e a cikk, ill. az utat sem mutatja, ezzel megtévesztve az olvasót. Ez helytelen kategorizálást, szóljon már más is rá, kérem. Szajci ^pošta 12:24, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

user:Szajci állítása hamis a kép leírásában szerepel 71-es főút. Tucatnyi esetben eltávolította a kategriát. Idézem: 'ha nem látszik az út akkor megtévesztő a kategórizálás' Kérem valaki állítsa le Szajci vandálkodását. - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 16:50, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

nem vandálkodom, kikérem magamnak. Globetrotter megtéveszti az olvasókat! Szajci ^pošta 16:52, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Egyetértek Szajcival abban, hogy egy út kategóriájában az útról és annak tartozékairól, térképéről, jelzéséről, stb. legyenek képek, de teljesen megértem Globetrottert is, hogy azt az információt, hogy ezek a képek az út mentén készültek, nem akarja veszni hagyni. Mielőtt továbbfajul a vita és még erősebb személyeskedések történnek, javaslok egy köztes megoldást: az út melletti objektumok pl. Obejcts/Buildings/Monuments near Route 71 (Hungary) vagy hasonló kategóriá(k)ba kerüljenek, ami lehetne az út alkategóriája. (Mint pl. Category:Balatonfüred → Category:Fountains in Balatonfüred) Mit szóltok hozzá? --Rlevente (talk) 20:43, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Nem tudom a 'near' kategóriát, hogyan lehetetne definiálni, akkor inkább pl. a Route 71 in Gyenesdiás vagy /egyébb település/ esetleg utcanév kellene.

Amúgy meg ha user:Szajci szerint nem az út mentén készültek mert 'nem látszik rajta az út' akkor ez mit sem ér.

Nekem úgy tünik nem fogadja el sem a koordinátát, sem a leírásban szereplő címet 'nem biztos hogy ott készült' ezt írta.

Amúgy kiváncsi lennék ezeket a képeket File:Proximity óra leolvasó (Budapest Gyógyfürdői).jpg File:Platánfák.jpg File:Platánfák, 2.jpg File:Proximity órák (Budapest gyógyfürdői).jpg hová tenné bárki is helyileg, ha nem oda ahová eleve tették mégleírásincs csak a Szt. Lukács Gyógyfürdő es Uszoda -ba lettek betéve már eleve. - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 21:19, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Rendben, legyen úgy, ahogy Rlevente javasolja :) További jó szerkesztést mindenkinek Szajci ^pošta 05:15, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

@Szajci, Rlevente, and Globetrotter19: Létező forma a commons kategóriái között a "Category:Views from ...", ha ez megfelel a célnak, a kecsének és a káposztának is. ;o) Fauvirt (talk) 11:28, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Nem itt nincs egyetlen view sem. Nem is értem az egész vitát. Csupa olyan képről van szó amit az út mentén az első 'telken' v. árpokparti keresztnél az út szélén készítettem a 71-es út településen belüli szakaszán. - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 11:34, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Akkor "Category:Photographs taken from ..."? Fauvirt (talk) 11:37, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Mintha azt mondanánk, az út kategória csak az úttal kapcsolatos dolgokat tartalmazhatja, pl mintha egy utcába vagy egy térre szobrot nem kategórizálhatnánk, csak jelzőtáblát útburkolati jelet stb. Ez nem is ésszerűtlen hanem szinte örültség. - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 11:39, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Kb annyira, mintha nem lehetne tovább finomítani egy kategóriát, hiszen egy alkategória egy kategória része... ha így Szajcinak is megfelelne, hogy a képek jó helyre kerüljenek, nem értem mi a probléma ezzel...? Vannak "cifrább" apróságok is a Commons-kategóriákban... Fauvirt (talk) 12:12, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Nekem Rlevente megoldása teljesen megfelel. Én kompromisszumkész voltam, remélem a vitapartnerem is hasonlóan kompromisszumkész lesz, és átalakítja a megbeszéltek alapján. Szajci ^pošta 13:56, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Mi az, hogy kompromisszumkész? Kiderült, hogy jogtalanul lettek eltávolítva a kategóriák, hiszen ha van alkategória akkor ez ide tartozik.

Ja, és én is kompromisszumkész vagyok, ha valaki tudja pontosan milyen alkategória kell,-mit aztán senki se fog vitatni,-akkor kérem csinája meg.

Amúgy eleve is ezt kellett volna Szajcinak csinálnia, nem pedig leszedni a kategóriát. - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 15:10, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Ez az alkategóriás dolog most lett megbeszélve, de megcsinálom akkor ma vagy holnap. További jó szerkesztést. Szajci ^pošta 15:12, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

AdvancedSearch

From May 8, AdvancedSearch will be available as a beta feature in your wiki. The feature enhances the search page through an advanced parameters form and aims to make existing search options more visible and accessible for everyone. AdvancedSearch is a project by WMDE Technical Wishes. Everyone is invited to test the feature and we hope that it will serve you well in your work!

Birgit Müller (WMDE) 14:45, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Árpádföld

Sziasztok! Még 2014-ben @Rakás: létrehozta a Category:Árpádföld (Budapest), amit korábban szerkesztettem is, csak elfelejtettem... mivel a XVI. kerület épületeit városrészekre kategorizáltam, észrevettem, hogy a Category:Árpádföld piros, ezért létrehoztam... így viszont duplikátum keletkezett. Most azért írok ide, hogy hátha tudja valaki, hogy van-e más Árpádföld is, mert akkor teljesen jogos a Budapest egyértelműsítés, vagy ha nincs, akkor hogyan tovább (valamelyiket valahogyan törölni kell)?... Üdv, Fauvirt (talk) 09:27, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

@Fauvirt: Én nem tudok arról, hogy lenne máshol is, igaz nem néztem utána --Rakás (talk) 11:13, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Köszönöm! Akkor melyik maradjon? Mi a jobb, mi az, ami a kategóriarendszer szerint helyesebb? (én azért hajlok az egyértelműsítő nélküli verzióra, nehogy valaki úgy járjon, mint én.. de nem tudom Commonson és Kategóriáknál mi ilyenkor, akár ha kellene is egyértelműsíteni, a teendő.) Fauvirt (talk) 14:02, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

@Fauvirt: Szerintem maradjon a régebbi verzió. Ha felbukkanna egy másik is (bárnem hiszem, hogy ez előfordulna), ráérünk akkor is agyalni a kérdésen. Rakás (talk) 15:02, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Rakás a hozzászólásában egymásnak ellentmondó dolgokat ír. Ha a régebbi változat marad, pont akkor nincs miről agyalni, hiszen ha ez már egyértelműsítve van, akkor az új felbukkanást kell csak egyértelműsítve létrehozni. Agyalni akkor kéne, ha a mezítlábas kifejezés marad, és felbukkan egy új lehetőség, mert akkor kéne agyalni azon, melyiknek mi legyen a neve. Véleményem szerint, ha nincs miért egyértelműsíteni, mert nincs mivel, és nincs mitől megkülönböztetni (és, ahogy a korábbit létrehozó le is írta, ő sem hiszi, hogy lesz ilyen), akkor értelmetlen és felesleges a megkülönböztető jelzés. Én azt támogatom, hogy a szimpla nevű maradjon. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 08:07, 25 May 2018 (UTC)