Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Turku Castle.jpg

Image:Turku Castle.jpg, not featured

Voting period ends on 31 Oct 2008 at 08:48:18

Info created by Dilaudid • uploaded by Dilaudid • nominated by Dilaudid on 08:48, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Dilaudid 08:48, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Nice composition, but a poor quality. Did you shot it in jpg? --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 16:54, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Can't recall, could be. Hasn't stopped my other photos from being FP'd / QI'd... :) –Dilaudid 09:00, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - I suggest you reshoot it in RAW, because it will improve your picture a lot. The composition is great namely. --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 16:30, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Karelj (talk) 17:08, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support ---donald- (talk) 10:16, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I would support because of great colours, contrast and perspective, but the tower is leaning slightly to the left. Can you confirm this is from the construction itself? If not, I will oppose this, but I would support a corrected version. --S23678 (talk) 13:25, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment On close inspection you'll notice the left side on the other hand is leaning slightly to the right: I've left just the slightest perspective distortion because the walls of the castle are actually curved, which would imho show as more distracting if the perspective distortion were to be neutralised altogether. –Dilaudid 09:00, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Support Curved walls? That's all what I needed to hear. --S23678 (talk) 13:00, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support impressive composition, jpeg looks okay to me --che 14:41, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Poor quality Fimport (talk) 22:51, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Question Do people even bother to take a look at this picture at full resolution? The quality is really poor and still people support it.. This is nothing personal b.t.w. Dilaudid. --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 16:29, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Lack of details. Lycaon (talk) 00:04, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not sharp enough. How do you turn this on (talk) 19:38, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support-- DarkAp89 Commons 14:51, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose not natural & failed composition & angle --Turzh (talk) 16:36, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Question Can you be more specific, what exactly do you think is not natural here? The colours are straight out of the camera. –Dilaudid 22:01, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

result: 6 supports, 5 opposes, 0 neutral => not featured. Benh (talk) 19:48, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]