Info created, uploaded and nominated by Thermos --Thermos 16:29, 14 April 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support --Thermos 16:29, 14 April 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Neutral - sky un-naturally dark grey-blue. Support if this is lightened to natural colour - MPF 20:15, 14 April 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose ditto to MPF. -- Dennis Wood 20:58, 14 April 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Neutral , ^ yep --che 23:37, 14 April 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose not sharp enough, composition ?, --Karelj 21:35, 15 April 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support Unnatural sky helps the image be more dramatic. It seems sharp enough: how perfect od you want to get? The composition could be considered a bit strange, but I don't see this as a major problem. Kulshrax 01:30, 17 April 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose - This is a nice picture, both technically and aesthetically. But not close to this one , IMO. Quality image? Sure. - Alvesgaspar 07:37, 17 April 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose tight crop - I'm not sure what is the point of this photo --Leafnode 06:17, 18 April 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support Nice close-up of the frieze and architrave, nicely shows the damage and restauration efforts. ~ trialsanderrors 06:56, 18 April 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Neutral ack Leafnode --Spundun 21:56, 19 April 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support - Benh 16:56, 20 April 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 3 neutral => not featured. Simonizer 20:54, 30 April 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]