Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tykadlo.jpg

File:Tykadlo.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Feb 2016 at 23:40:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera
Info created and uploaded by Pavel kejzlar - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 23:40, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 23:40, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I approve of this picture out of pure scientific interest and encyclopedic value, but it's also interesting to look at for its own sake. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:31, 28 January 2016 (UTC) I'm changing my vote to Oppose, because I agree with the others that "butterfly feeler" is not a sufficient identification. What type of butterfly? Attention should be paid to clearly valid objections, and since this is an electromicrograph, it seems particularly important for the scan to be documented in a scholarly way. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:50, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Very nice and useful image... but the file description needs to be expanded (scanning electron migrograph, scale) and the species needs to be identified. --Cayambe (talk) 06:52, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support for obvious visual reasons --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:20, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:55, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely texture. Daniel Case (talk) 15:26, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Potentially interesting, but little use if we don't know what it is. Charles (talk) 15:29, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 07:57, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose until we have more information. Yann (talk) 15:13, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as Yann --Hubertl 18:21, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Yann, until there is more information. --Cayambe (talk) 19:38, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 16:13, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 13:09, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:12, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]