Wikimedia Commons

Commons:Ehdokkaat suositelluiksi kuviksi

Shortcut
Ehdokkaat suositelluiksi kuviksi muilla kielillä:
Ehdokkaat suositelluiksi kuviksi Ehdokkaat suositelluiksi kuviksi        Statuksen poistoehdotukset Statuksen poistoehdotukset

Alla on tämänhetkiset ehdokkaat suositelluiksi kuviksi. Huomaa, että tämä ei ole sama asia kuin päivän kuva.

Skippaa:

Ehdottaminen

edit

Ohjeita ehdottajille

edit

Lue läpi Commons:Image guidelines ennen kuvan ehdottamista.

Alla on yhteenveto siitä, mitä tulee tarkastella arvioidessa kuvan sopivuutta suositelluksi kuvaksi:

  • Resoluutio – Yleensä kuvat, joiden resoluutio on alle kaksi megapikseliä, on hylätty. Alle kahden megapikselin kuva voidaan hyväksyä vain poikkeustapauksessa. Huomaa, että kuvassa, jonka resoluutio on 1 600 × 1 200, on noin 1,92 megapikseliä, joten se on kelvoton.
Commonsissa sijaitsevia kuvia voidaan käyttää muuhunkin kuin tietokoneen näytöllä katselemiseen. Niitä voidaan tulostaa tai katsella suurella resoluutiolla olevilla monitoreilla. Emme voi ennustaa, millaisia laitteistot tulevat olemaan tulevaisuudessa, joten kuvan tulee olla niin suurella resoluutiolla kuin mahdollista.
  • Fokus – kuvan tärkeimpien kohteiden tulisi olla teräviä.
  • Edusta ja tausta – edustalla ja taustalla olevat asiat voivat olla häiritseviä. Tarkista, että edustalla olevat kohteet eivät peitä mitään kuvan kannalta tärkeää ja taustalla olevat kohteet eivät pilaa asetelmaa, esimerkiksi katuvalo ei näytä tulevan jonkun päästä.
  • Tekninen korkealaatuisuus – suositellun kuvan tulee olla teknisesti korkealaatuinen.
  • Digitaaliset manipulaatiot eivät saa vetää nenästä kuvan katsojaa. Kuvassa olevien kauneusvirheiden korjaaminen on sallittua, jos korjaus on tehty hyvin ja sen tarkoituksena ei ole vääristää kuvaa. Hyväksyttäjä manipulaatioita ovat rajaus, perspektiivin oikaisu, terävöittäminen, sumentaminen ja valotuksen sekä värien korjailu. Monimutkaisemmat manipulaatiot ovat sallittuja vain, jos mallinetta {{Retouched picture}} käytetään kuvaussivulla. Kuvauksettomat tai väärin kuvatut monimutkaiset manipulaatiot ovat kiellettyjä.
  • Arvo – päätavoitteenamme on erottaa arvokkaimmat kuvat muista. Suositellun kuvan tulee olla jotenkin erikoinen.
    • Auringonlaskuista otetut valokuvat ovat kaikki vähän samanlaisia (Valokuvia)(Suomessa otettuja valokuvia)
    • Yökuvat saattavat olla hienompia, mutta päiväkuvista ilmenee yleensä enemmän tietoa
    • Kaunis ei ole sama asia kuin arvokas

Teknisiä yksityiskohtia käsitellään kohdissa valotus, asetelma, liikkeenhallinta ja terävyysalue.

  • Valotus – valotuksella tarkoitetaan valokuvauksessa kameran filmiin tallentuvaa tai digitaalikamerassa valoherkän kennon tallentamaa valon määrää. Valotuksen tulisi olla sopiva. Laajat ylivalottuneet alueet ovat usein häiritseviä.
  • Asetelma – asetelmalla tarkoitetaan kuvan esineiden sijoittumista toisiinsa nähden. ”Kolmoissääntö” (esimerkkikuva) on hyvä nyrkkisääntö siitä, millainen on hyvä asetelma. Kolmoissäännön ideana on, että kuva jaetaan kahdella pystyviivalla ja kahdella vaakaviivalla yhdeksään osaan (3×3). Pääaiheen sijoittaminen tiukasti kuvan keskelle on yleensä huonompi vaihtoehto mielenkiintoisuuden kannalta kuin pääaiheen sijoittaminen johonkin neljästä viivojen muodostamasta risteyksestä. Horisonttia ei tulisi sijoittaa kuvan keskelle, vaan jommankumman viivan keskelle. Kolmoissäännön avulla saadaan luotua dynaaminen kuva.
  • Liikkeenhallinta – liikkeenhallinnalla tarkoitetaan sitä, miten liike näkyy kuvassa. Liike voi olla terävää tai epätarkkaa. Jompikumpi aina ei ole paras vaihtoehto, vaan tärkeintä on aikomus havainnollistaa jotain. Liike on suhteellista kuvan kohteisiin verrattuna. Esimerkiksi valokuva ralliautosta, joka näyttäisi olevan paikallaan taustaa vasten, on huonompi vaihtoehto kuin valokuva ralliautosta, joka näkyy terävästi, mutta jonka tausta on sumuista, koska tällöin liikkeen huomaa helposti. Tätä kutsutaan ”panoroinniksi”. Toisaalta valokuva hyppäävästä koripallon pelaajasta, joka näyttää olevan paikallaan taustaa vasten, on hyvä sen epäluonnollisuuden takia.
  • Terävyysalue – terävyysalueella tarkoitetaan kuvan kohteen terävyyttä ympäristöön verrattuna. Terävyysalue valitaan jokaisen kuvan kohdalla erikseen. Suuri tai pieni terävyysalue voi huonontaa tai parantaa kuvan laatua. Pientä terävyysaluetta voidaan käyttää erottamaan pääkohde muusta ympäristöstä. Näin katsojan huomio kiinnittyy haluttuun kohteeseen. Suurta terävyysaluetta voidaan taas käyttää tilan havainnollistamiseen. Lähtökohtaisesti syväterävyysalue muodostuu sitä lyhyemmäksi, mitä suurempaa aukkoarvoa valokuvaaja käyttää. Vastaavasti pientä aukkoarvoa käytettäessä syväterävyysalue voi ulottua kuvan etualalta äärettömään. Aukon arvon lisäksi syväterävyysalueeseen vaikuttaa kuitenkin myös objektiivin todellinen polttoväli ja toisaalta kohteen etäisyys kuvaajasta.

Alla käsitellään vielä grafiikkaa.

  • Terävyys – pääkohteiden ääriviivojen on oltava teräviä.
  • Kolmiulotteisuus – kolmiulotteisuuden on oltava laadukasta. Parhaiten tämä onnistuu siten, että valo tulee kohteen sivulta. Yleensä kuvaajasta päin tuleva valo ei onnistu luomaan kunnollista kolmiulotteista vaikutelmaa, vaan se johtaa litteään vaikutelmaan. Paras valo ulkona on aamulla tai illalla.
  • Värit – värit eivät saa olla liian kylläisiä.
  • Tekstuuri – kohteen pinnan on oltava kolmiulotteisen näköinen ja laadukas.
  • Perspektiivi – kuvan tulee olla kolmiulotteinen.
  • Tasapaino – kuvan kohteiden tulisi olla tasapainossa keskenään. Suurta määrää kohteita ei tulisi jommallakummalla puolella.
  • Mittasuhde – mittasuhteella tarkoitetaan kuvan kohteiden kokoa toisiinsa verrattuna. Yleensä meillä taipumus esittää pienet kohteet pieninä, mutta toisaalta pienen kohteen esittäminen suurena luonnossa suurta kohdetta vasten on myös hyvä tekniikka, esimerkiksi kukan esittäminen vuorta vasten.
  • Symbolinen tarkoitus – huono kuva vaikeasta aiheesta on parempi kuin hyvä kuva helposta aiheesta.
Valokuvaaja ja/tai sen katselija voivat tarkastella kuvan kohdetta puolueellisesti. Kuvan arvoa ei tulisi arvioida arvioijan kulttuurillisen taustan perusteella, vaan se tulisi arvioida kuvan kulttuurillisen taustan perusteella. Hyvä kuva ”puhuu” katsojalle herättäen sellaisia tunteita kuin ilo, sympatia, herkkyys, suru, inho, viha ja raivo. Hyvän kuvan herättämät tunteet eivät ole vain positiivisia.

Uuden ehdotuksen lisääminen

edit

Jos sinusta tuntuu siltä, että olet löytänyt kuvan, josta voisi tulla suositeltu kuva ja jonka kuvaussivulla on hyväksytty ja totuudenmukainen tekijänoikeusmalline, toimi seuraavasti:

Askel 1: Kopioi kuvan nimi alla olevaan laatikkoon ja paina nappia ”Luo äänestyssivu”.


Askel 2: Noudata avautuvalla sivulla olevia ohjeita.

Askel 3: Lisää ehdokaslistan alkuun seuraava koodi:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:KIRJOITA TIEDOSTON NIMI TÄHÄN}}

Äänestäminen

edit

Käytä äänestäessäsi seuraavia mallineita:

  • {{Support}} luo lopputuloksen  Support. Käytä mallinetta, jos kannatat kuvaa suositelluksi kuvaksi.
  • {{Oppose}} luo lopputuloksen  Oppose. Käytä mallinetta, jos vastustat statusta.
  • {{Neutral}} luo lopputuloksen  Neutral. Käytä mallinetta, jos äänestät tyhjää.
  • {{Comment}} luo lopputuloksen  Comment. Käytä mallinetta, jos kommentoit jotakin.
  • {{Info}} luo lopputuloksen  Info. Käytä mallinetta, jos informoit jostakin.
  • {{Question}} luo lopputuloksen  Question. Käytä mallinetta, jos kysyt jostakin.

Jos kuvan ei ole mahdollista päästä suositelluksi kuvaksi, lisää äänestyssivulle {{FPX|KIRJOITA TÄHÄN, MIKSI KUVA EI VOI OLLA SUOSITELTU KUVA}}.

Perustele aina mielipiteesi. Muista allekirjoittaa lisäyksesi. Allekirjoittaminen tapahtuu kirjoittamalla ~~~~ kommentin perään tai painamalla työkalurivin painiketta kursorin ollessa sopivalla kohdalla.

Statuksen poistoehdotuksen lisääminen

edit

Jos jokin suositeltu kuva on mielestäsi kelvoton suositelluksi kuvaksi, voit ehdottaa suositellun kuvan statuksen poistoa.

Sellaisissa äänestyksissä tulee käyttää mallinetta {{Keep}}, joka luo lopputuloksen  Keep, halutessasi statuksen säilyvän tai mallinetta {{Delist}}, joka luo lopputuloksen  Delist , halutessasi statuksen poistoa.

Luodessasi uuden äänestyksen, toimi ohjeen mukaan:

Askel 1: Kopioi kuvan nimi alla olevaan laatikkoon ja paina nappia ”Luo äänestyssivu”.


Askel 2: Noudata avautuvalla sivulla olevia ohjeita.

Askel 3: Lisää ehdokaslistan alkuun seuraava koodi:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:KIRJOITA TIEDOSTON NIMI TÄHÄN}}

Käytäntö

edit

Yleiset säännöt

edit
  1. Äänestys on auki tasan yhdeksän vuorokautta ehdotuksen tekemisen jälkeen.
  2. Käyttäjätunnuksettomat käyttäjät saavat ehdottaa ja keskustella, mutta eivät äänestää.
  3. Ehdotus ei ole ääni. Ääni on annettava erikseen.
  4. Ehdottaja voi vetää ehdotuksen pois lisäämällä {{withdraw|~~~~}} äänestyssivulle.
  5. Wikimedia Commons ei ole vain Wikipedian kuvavarasto, joten kuvia ei tule arvioida vain Wikipediaan soveltuvuuden perusteella.
  6. Jos kuva ei saa muita kannattavia ääniä kuin ehdottajan viiden vuorokauden kuluessa ehdotuksen tekemisestä, poistoäänestys tulee lopettaa.
  7. Mallineella {{FPX}} merkitty poistoäänestys tulee lopettaa 24 tunnin kuluttua mallineen lisäämisestä, jos muita kannatusääniä kuin ehdottajan ei ole.

Statuksen muutos

edit

Kuvasta tulee suositeltu kuva, jos se täyttää seuraavat vaatimukset:

  1. Kuvaussivulla on hyväksytty ja totuudenmukainen tekijänoikeusmalline
  2. Vähintään viisi kannatusääntä
  3. Vähintään kaksi kolmasosaa äänistä kannattavia
  4. Saman kuvan eri versiosta vain yksi saa olla suositeltu kuva. Siitä kuvasta, joka on kerännyt eniten kannattavia ääniä, tulee suositeltu kuva.

Statuksen poistoehdotuksen kohdalla sovelletaan samoja sääntöjä. Jos statuksen poistoa kannattavia ääniä ei ole tullut ehdottajan äänen lisäksi viiden vuorokauden kuluessa ehdotuksen teosta, äänestys tulee sulkea.

Ohjeita äänestyksen lopettamisesta on sivulla Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished.

Arvostele hyvien tapojen mukaisesti

edit

Muista, että kuva jota kommentoit on jonkun tekemä. Älä käytä sellaista tyyliä kommenteissasi kuin ”Vihaan kuvaa”, ”Kuva on ihan ruma” tai ”Kamala kuva”.

Katso myös

edit

Sisällysluettelo

edit

Ehdokkaat suositelluiksi kuviksi

edit
Jos uudet ehdotukset eivät näy tällä sivulla, purge this page's cache.
edit

File:Sunset behind Benidorm skyscrapers.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 9 Jan 2025 at 16:20:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Most w Kozłowie 2023.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 9 Jan 2025 at 13:56:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Mysuru Palace - Left Front Towers.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 8 Jan 2025 at 19:07:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Souvenir advertisement for Princess Ida by Alice Havers - Page 1.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 7 Jan 2025 at 23:53:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:002 Greater flamingo taking off in the Camargue Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 7 Jan 2025 at 23:22:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Tropical kingbird in the rain (60130).jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 7 Jan 2025 at 22:18:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Brickell neighborhood skyline (60062p).jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 7 Jan 2025 at 22:13:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:61-212-9001 Buchach Monastery RB 24.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 7 Jan 2025 at 14:33:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Laughing kookaburra (Dacelo novaeguineae novaeguineae) Hobart.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 7 Jan 2025 at 14:26:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Two-seater paramotor - Powered paragliding in flight - 3 quarter view a sunny afternoon in Don Det Laos.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 7 Jan 2025 at 05:33:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Foolish Wives ad-restored.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 6 Jan 2025 at 19:55:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  • @Yann: do you see the header of this magazine? We can't read the first words because the page is cut off. It means the picture is cut off too. The source itself is badly cropped. Some content is missing. Not all the sources on the web are of good quality. And it's even more obvious on the previous page. If you look at other scans from the same source, they almost all contain black shadows on the sides -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:01, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I see what you mean. Yann (talk) 11:45, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Is the version copied from the web Ezarateesteban 13:26, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kosh Agach panorama.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 6 Jan 2025 at 13:50:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Pinoy Pandesal.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 6 Jan 2025 at 11:48:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Mekong water reflection of lightings of Don Det and colorful sky at sunset seen from a sand beach in Laos.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 6 Jan 2025 at 07:15:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Catedral de Santa Cecilia, Albi, Francia, 2023-01-07, DD 71-73 HDR.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 6 Jan 2025 at 03:46:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:James Pinson Labulo Davies and Sara Forbes Bonetta.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 5 Jan 2025 at 19:21:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Bust of Shapur II the Great in the Metropolitan Museum of Art.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 5 Jan 2025 at 14:31:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Крем супа од тиквички 3.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 5 Jan 2025 at 12:34:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:071 African blue flycatcher at Kibale forest National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 5 Jan 2025 at 09:47:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Lemleleediku (Cataclysta lemnata) röövik,.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 5 Jan 2025 at 05:38:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
The blue tint has gone, but it's still too dark and {{Uncategorized}}. See the yellow template on the file page displaying the text "This media file is uncategorized." Or visit COM:CAT -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:34, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I already added the category ...weird. The topic of light still remains incomprehensible to me, it seems to be a constant "concern" here with my pictures. I think I have enough experience to be able to assess the lighting already when taking pictures and I don't agree with this criticism here... Maybe I have bad eyes .. 🤷 Janeklass (talk) 09:30, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
At least you can be sure the blue hue has disappeared from your photo... 🔍 There is now one category (added at 9:22), but "microscope (something)" and "focus stacking image (something)" are missing -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:49, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Health, Inclusivity (Braille, Unesco Review) - UNESCO - PHOTO0000000840 0001.tiff

edit

Voting period ends on 5 Jan 2025 at 02:00:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Blacktip reef sharks (Carcharhinus melanopterus) Moorea.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 4 Jan 2025 at 17:50:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  •   Support Sorry if I'm wrong, but I think mixing water and air in a single shot is not easy, and rare enough. Thus per COM:FP: "A bad picture of a very difficult subject is better than a good picture of an ordinary subject." In that case I guess the top of the device might be humid? Still I find the composition captivating and innovating. The image shows us how close the sharks swim to the surface. And it reminds me Jaws (the film). The level of detail of the animals is excellent for an underwater picture -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:07, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks. The underwater plastic dome, which is wet, distorts the top half of the picture. Of course, many half-and-half photos online are merged images. There may be other half-and-halfs of sharks (or other animals) on Commons, but I've not found any. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:35, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Giles' photos and the experiences he presented have now convinced me otherwise. My apologies, Charles. Nevertheless, it is still impressive, and I fully support Famberhorst's recommendation to nominate it at VIC. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 22:41, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Support --Harlock81 (talk) 16:16, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Comment We have valued image (VI) for rare photos that do not meet the FP standard.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:26, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Comment Half underwater photography with unblury top is not hard to do. There are three different ways to achieve it : 1) rubing some special lotion on the dome glass like this product ; 2) keeping the top of the glass dry ; 3) replunging the dome completely in the water and then taking it out again. I would personally not use the first option as I don't think such lotion would be good for the ocean or the animals. But I got very easily many pictures with sharp top only using the technic described with option number 3. Here are some examples taken with a GoPro inside a GDome in 2021 in the Bahamas : 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7. And I have much more : link. For this picture, if the dome would have been plunged underwater and taken out again a picture with clear top would have been taken. Given how easy it is to take half underwater pictures and given how common and easy black tip reef sharks can be found for tourists I personnally think that this picture is not at FP level and not even at QI level, sorry. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:26, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Comment Sorry, I should have gone to the very shallow water where the pigs were. Would that that sharks were that slow... Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:00, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    No need for shallow water, you can easily dip back the dome in the water in deep water. Also the pigs were actualy the ones running while blacktip sharks usually swim slowly most of the time. Finally, blacktip sharks are very easily found in shallow water and the fact that the sand is visible in this picture indicates that it was taken in shallow water -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:27, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
edit

Voting period ends on 4 Jan 2025 at 15:08:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
edit

Voting period ends on 4 Jan 2025 at 14:25:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
edit

Voting period ends on 4 Jan 2025 at 14:20:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File: Ho Chi Minh - 1946 Portrait.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 4 Jan 2025 at 12:04:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Deity performer.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 4 Jan 2025 at 02:19:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
Thanks for the confirmation. Unfortunately this local adjustment all around the feathers is too obvious and makes the appearance   overprocessed. Possible to remove the vignetting? -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:06, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Updated the photo to look more natural without the halo behind the subject. Please let me know if these adjustments work. Thanks Mpamidimarthi (talk) 17:21, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Palais de Justice de Montbenon - Lausanne - Effet fisheye - GT August 2024.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 3 Jan 2025 at 18:22:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Switzerland
  •   Info The Montbenon courthouse was built between 1881 and 1886. This is an experimental composition shown from the side with a subtle fisheye effect, but the building is not actually curved. This type of wide shot allows you to appreciate the effect of the clouds in the sky being swept by strong winds at altitude. Created, uploaded and nominated by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 18:22, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 18:22, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Support I agree in this case that the curvature makes this photo very striking and accentuates the sweeping clouds. The quality is outstanding and I can't find any stitching errors. Cmao20 (talk) 00:41, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Support iMahesh (talk) 01:44, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Comment Like here, the cylindrical lines don't work for me, because it makes the appearance weird like deformed. Is it possible to make the perspective rectilinear? I also find the crop tight at the bottom -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:52, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi Basile and thanks for your comment. In this case the rectilinear projection does not work too, furthermore there would be a tree and a bush hugely depicted on the right side, subjects in the foreground and which would occupy 30% of the composition. Yes, your observations are correct, the bottom is tight, but there is a valid reasonː The compositional photo of the monuments, as a rule and out of politeness towards other people, must be taken if possible without framing them. In this case it was difficult, because there were several dozen people (even close to me) enjoying the last rays of the sun in front of the view of Lake Geneva. For this reason I did not want and could not point the camera downwards. I absolutely had to avoid them also because there are many other disturbing and distracting elements: Trees, bushes, street lamps and the enormous statue of W. Tell, positioned in front of the main entrance of the building. The cylindrical projection, in this particular case, by distancing some parts of the edge subject by gently curving it, has the advantage of enhancing the central part of the building and offering the richness of details with the colors brightened by the golden hour, together with the sky as a co-protagonist backdrop. Terragio67 (talk) 05:42, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Support --SHB2000 (talk) 03:21, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Oppose -- It's really a shame about the great sky, but in a photo where the main subject is a building, the edges should be straight. Also, the vertical parallels contradict my individual eye impression. For me, the building seems to be spreading upwards. Sorry. Je-str (talk) 10:59, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Support --Harlock81 (talk) 16:22, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Support I'm not enthusiastic about this way of photographing either, but this building lends itself well to it in my opinion.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:03, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Support -- Radomianin (talk) 23:02, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Oppose Sorry, fisheye lenses are not adapted to architecture in my opinion. They completely distort the appearance of the lines and proportions. And in this case the slight curvature sounds like a technical flaw, in my view. Something like File:Palais de Justice de Montbennon, Lausanne.jpg (imagine the perspective fixed) or 2 would be much better. And there are not always people around this monument, apparently. The current crop is really too tight at the bottom, and overall unbalanced. People are cropped at the lower left corner. I understand the difficulty with visitors, but that doesn't make the image better unfortunately. It's relatively an easy subject, you can go again and give another try. I agree with Je-str the sky is nice, however, you can certainly meet different weather conditions there, at various times of the day, and use a rectilinear lens -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:16, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    To be accurate, this was taken using a rectilinear lens and remapped using a cylindrical-like projection.   Agree with the rest: the output is unfortunate. - Benh (talk) 10:48, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:28, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Oppose per Basile. Fisheye perspective could have purpose for some architecture shots, but in this case it looks easily avoidable and it doesn't look good. I'm missing also some air at the bottom. A shame because quality is nice and sky is amazing. --Fernando (talk) 13:54, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Oppose per Basile & Fernando. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 22:20, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Oppose Perspective correction needed. Wolverine X-eye 18:45, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Plain prinia (49385881393).jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 3 Jan 2025 at 08:45:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File: Earth, Moon and Lunar Module, AS11-44-6643.jpg (delist and replace)

edit

Voting period ends on 2 Jan 2025 at 19:41:58
 
Removed the greenish tint visible in the photograph which makes it worse.
 

  • For me the difference is that in the case of ‘Earthrise’ the picture was very heavily reproduced in contemporary news media to the extent that the famous version should be featured even if a technically better version exists. ‘Earthrise’ even has a Wikipedia article about it. In the case of this picture, it is a lot less famous and its value is in illustrating the event, not in its iconic status. Just my two cents, Cmao20 (talk) 02:46, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • You are right. This picture is less famous than others taken during the Apollo missions. We can propose and promote a version whose colors are more faithful to what an human eye would have seen, but we are not correcting a yellowed photograph. The featured image is the best version of the original picture, released during the Apollo Programm. The new version is a scientifically correct reproduction of what the other one represent. The two pictures are imho two different things, and both valuable. Imho, a {{Retouched picture}} is missing, also. --Harlock81 (talk) 14:54, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    If you want to add the Retouched picture feature to the page, you can do it yourself. I also see no reason why we can make two of the same photo both featured pictures. I agree with Cmao in the sense that Earthrise is the more historically reproduced photo Wcamp9 (talk) 23:11, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ParastooAhmadi.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 1 Jan 2025 at 20:30:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  • Dear Ταπυροι, yes, you can suggest an alternative by adding the code
==== Alternative ====
[[File:Parastoo Ahmadi.jpg|500x320px]] to this nomination, like here. Then you'll see if there's a consensus. Best regards -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:25, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

edit

 

File:صلاه السياح في معبد دندرة.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 1 Jan 2025 at 12:44:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:MKr361498 Neiße zwischen Görlitz und Zgorzelec.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 1 Jan 2025 at 12:43:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Dec 2024 at 20:41:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Statuksen poistoehdotukset

edit
edit

File:Sunset behind Benidorm skyscrapers.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 9 Jan 2025 at 16:20:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Most w Kozłowie 2023.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 9 Jan 2025 at 13:56:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Mysuru Palace - Left Front Towers.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 8 Jan 2025 at 19:07:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Souvenir advertisement for Princess Ida by Alice Havers - Page 1.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 7 Jan 2025 at 23:53:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:002 Greater flamingo taking off in the Camargue Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 7 Jan 2025 at 23:22:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Tropical kingbird in the rain (60130).jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 7 Jan 2025 at 22:18:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Brickell neighborhood skyline (60062p).jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 7 Jan 2025 at 22:13:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:61-212-9001 Buchach Monastery RB 24.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 7 Jan 2025 at 14:33:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Laughing kookaburra (Dacelo novaeguineae novaeguineae) Hobart.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 7 Jan 2025 at 14:26:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Two-seater paramotor - Powered paragliding in flight - 3 quarter view a sunny afternoon in Don Det Laos.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 7 Jan 2025 at 05:33:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Foolish Wives ad-restored.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 6 Jan 2025 at 19:55:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  • @Yann: do you see the header of this magazine? We can't read the first words because the page is cut off. It means the picture is cut off too. The source itself is badly cropped. Some content is missing. Not all the sources on the web are of good quality. And it's even more obvious on the previous page. If you look at other scans from the same source, they almost all contain black shadows on the sides -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:01, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I see what you mean. Yann (talk) 11:45, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Is the version copied from the web Ezarateesteban 13:26, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kosh Agach panorama.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 6 Jan 2025 at 13:50:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Pinoy Pandesal.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 6 Jan 2025 at 11:48:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Mekong water reflection of lightings of Don Det and colorful sky at sunset seen from a sand beach in Laos.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 6 Jan 2025 at 07:15:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Catedral de Santa Cecilia, Albi, Francia, 2023-01-07, DD 71-73 HDR.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 6 Jan 2025 at 03:46:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:James Pinson Labulo Davies and Sara Forbes Bonetta.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 5 Jan 2025 at 19:21:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Bust of Shapur II the Great in the Metropolitan Museum of Art.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 5 Jan 2025 at 14:31:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Крем супа од тиквички 3.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 5 Jan 2025 at 12:34:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:071 African blue flycatcher at Kibale forest National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 5 Jan 2025 at 09:47:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Lemleleediku (Cataclysta lemnata) röövik,.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 5 Jan 2025 at 05:38:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
The blue tint has gone, but it's still too dark and {{Uncategorized}}. See the yellow template on the file page displaying the text "This media file is uncategorized." Or visit COM:CAT -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:34, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I already added the category ...weird. The topic of light still remains incomprehensible to me, it seems to be a constant "concern" here with my pictures. I think I have enough experience to be able to assess the lighting already when taking pictures and I don't agree with this criticism here... Maybe I have bad eyes .. 🤷 Janeklass (talk) 09:30, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
At least you can be sure the blue hue has disappeared from your photo... 🔍 There is now one category (added at 9:22), but "microscope (something)" and "focus stacking image (something)" are missing -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:49, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Health, Inclusivity (Braille, Unesco Review) - UNESCO - PHOTO0000000840 0001.tiff

edit

Voting period ends on 5 Jan 2025 at 02:00:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Blacktip reef sharks (Carcharhinus melanopterus) Moorea.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 4 Jan 2025 at 17:50:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  •   Support Sorry if I'm wrong, but I think mixing water and air in a single shot is not easy, and rare enough. Thus per COM:FP: "A bad picture of a very difficult subject is better than a good picture of an ordinary subject." In that case I guess the top of the device might be humid? Still I find the composition captivating and innovating. The image shows us how close the sharks swim to the surface. And it reminds me Jaws (the film). The level of detail of the animals is excellent for an underwater picture -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:07, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks. The underwater plastic dome, which is wet, distorts the top half of the picture. Of course, many half-and-half photos online are merged images. There may be other half-and-halfs of sharks (or other animals) on Commons, but I've not found any. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:35, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Giles' photos and the experiences he presented have now convinced me otherwise. My apologies, Charles. Nevertheless, it is still impressive, and I fully support Famberhorst's recommendation to nominate it at VIC. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 22:41, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Support --Harlock81 (talk) 16:16, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Comment We have valued image (VI) for rare photos that do not meet the FP standard.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:26, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Comment Half underwater photography with unblury top is not hard to do. There are three different ways to achieve it : 1) rubing some special lotion on the dome glass like this product ; 2) keeping the top of the glass dry ; 3) replunging the dome completely in the water and then taking it out again. I would personally not use the first option as I don't think such lotion would be good for the ocean or the animals. But I got very easily many pictures with sharp top only using the technic described with option number 3. Here are some examples taken with a GoPro inside a GDome in 2021 in the Bahamas : 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7. And I have much more : link. For this picture, if the dome would have been plunged underwater and taken out again a picture with clear top would have been taken. Given how easy it is to take half underwater pictures and given how common and easy black tip reef sharks can be found for tourists I personnally think that this picture is not at FP level and not even at QI level, sorry. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:26, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Comment Sorry, I should have gone to the very shallow water where the pigs were. Would that that sharks were that slow... Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:00, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    No need for shallow water, you can easily dip back the dome in the water in deep water. Also the pigs were actualy the ones running while blacktip sharks usually swim slowly most of the time. Finally, blacktip sharks are very easily found in shallow water and the fact that the sand is visible in this picture indicates that it was taken in shallow water -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:27, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
edit

Voting period ends on 4 Jan 2025 at 15:08:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
edit

Voting period ends on 4 Jan 2025 at 14:25:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
edit

Voting period ends on 4 Jan 2025 at 14:20:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File: Ho Chi Minh - 1946 Portrait.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 4 Jan 2025 at 12:04:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:Deity performer.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 4 Jan 2025 at 02:19:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
Thanks for the confirmation. Unfortunately this local adjustment all around the feathers is too obvious and makes the appearance   overprocessed. Possible to remove the vignetting? -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:06, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Updated the photo to look more natural without the halo behind the subject. Please let me know if these adjustments work. Thanks Mpamidimarthi (talk) 17:21, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Palais de Justice de Montbenon - Lausanne - Effet fisheye - GT August 2024.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 3 Jan 2025 at 18:22:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Switzerland
  •   Info The Montbenon courthouse was built between 1881 and 1886. This is an experimental composition shown from the side with a subtle fisheye effect, but the building is not actually curved. This type of wide shot allows you to appreciate the effect of the clouds in the sky being swept by strong winds at altitude. Created, uploaded and nominated by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 18:22, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 18:22, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Support I agree in this case that the curvature makes this photo very striking and accentuates the sweeping clouds. The quality is outstanding and I can't find any stitching errors. Cmao20 (talk) 00:41, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Support iMahesh (talk) 01:44, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Comment Like here, the cylindrical lines don't work for me, because it makes the appearance weird like deformed. Is it possible to make the perspective rectilinear? I also find the crop tight at the bottom -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:52, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi Basile and thanks for your comment. In this case the rectilinear projection does not work too, furthermore there would be a tree and a bush hugely depicted on the right side, subjects in the foreground and which would occupy 30% of the composition. Yes, your observations are correct, the bottom is tight, but there is a valid reasonː The compositional photo of the monuments, as a rule and out of politeness towards other people, must be taken if possible without framing them. In this case it was difficult, because there were several dozen people (even close to me) enjoying the last rays of the sun in front of the view of Lake Geneva. For this reason I did not want and could not point the camera downwards. I absolutely had to avoid them also because there are many other disturbing and distracting elements: Trees, bushes, street lamps and the enormous statue of W. Tell, positioned in front of the main entrance of the building. The cylindrical projection, in this particular case, by distancing some parts of the edge subject by gently curving it, has the advantage of enhancing the central part of the building and offering the richness of details with the colors brightened by the golden hour, together with the sky as a co-protagonist backdrop. Terragio67 (talk) 05:42, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Support --SHB2000 (talk) 03:21, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Oppose -- It's really a shame about the great sky, but in a photo where the main subject is a building, the edges should be straight. Also, the vertical parallels contradict my individual eye impression. For me, the building seems to be spreading upwards. Sorry. Je-str (talk) 10:59, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Support --Harlock81 (talk) 16:22, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Support I'm not enthusiastic about this way of photographing either, but this building lends itself well to it in my opinion.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:03, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Support -- Radomianin (talk) 23:02, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Oppose Sorry, fisheye lenses are not adapted to architecture in my opinion. They completely distort the appearance of the lines and proportions. And in this case the slight curvature sounds like a technical flaw, in my view. Something like File:Palais de Justice de Montbennon, Lausanne.jpg (imagine the perspective fixed) or 2 would be much better. And there are not always people around this monument, apparently. The current crop is really too tight at the bottom, and overall unbalanced. People are cropped at the lower left corner. I understand the difficulty with visitors, but that doesn't make the image better unfortunately. It's relatively an easy subject, you can go again and give another try. I agree with Je-str the sky is nice, however, you can certainly meet different weather conditions there, at various times of the day, and use a rectilinear lens -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:16, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    To be accurate, this was taken using a rectilinear lens and remapped using a cylindrical-like projection.   Agree with the rest: the output is unfortunate. - Benh (talk) 10:48, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:28, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Oppose per Basile. Fisheye perspective could have purpose for some architecture shots, but in this case it looks easily avoidable and it doesn't look good. I'm missing also some air at the bottom. A shame because quality is nice and sky is amazing. --Fernando (talk) 13:54, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Oppose per Basile & Fernando. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 22:20, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Oppose Perspective correction needed. Wolverine X-eye 18:45, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Plain prinia (49385881393).jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 3 Jan 2025 at 08:45:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File: Earth, Moon and Lunar Module, AS11-44-6643.jpg (delist and replace)

edit

Voting period ends on 2 Jan 2025 at 19:41:58
 
Removed the greenish tint visible in the photograph which makes it worse.
 

  • For me the difference is that in the case of ‘Earthrise’ the picture was very heavily reproduced in contemporary news media to the extent that the famous version should be featured even if a technically better version exists. ‘Earthrise’ even has a Wikipedia article about it. In the case of this picture, it is a lot less famous and its value is in illustrating the event, not in its iconic status. Just my two cents, Cmao20 (talk) 02:46, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • You are right. This picture is less famous than others taken during the Apollo missions. We can propose and promote a version whose colors are more faithful to what an human eye would have seen, but we are not correcting a yellowed photograph. The featured image is the best version of the original picture, released during the Apollo Programm. The new version is a scientifically correct reproduction of what the other one represent. The two pictures are imho two different things, and both valuable. Imho, a {{Retouched picture}} is missing, also. --Harlock81 (talk) 14:54, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    If you want to add the Retouched picture feature to the page, you can do it yourself. I also see no reason why we can make two of the same photo both featured pictures. I agree with Cmao in the sense that Earthrise is the more historically reproduced photo Wcamp9 (talk) 23:11, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ParastooAhmadi.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 1 Jan 2025 at 20:30:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
  • Dear Ταπυροι, yes, you can suggest an alternative by adding the code
==== Alternative ====
[[File:Parastoo Ahmadi.jpg|500x320px]] to this nomination, like here. Then you'll see if there's a consensus. Best regards -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:25, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

edit

 

File:صلاه السياح في معبد دندرة.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 1 Jan 2025 at 12:44:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 

File:MKr361498 Neiße zwischen Görlitz und Zgorzelec.jpg

edit

Voting period ends on 1 Jan 2025 at 12:43:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 
edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Dec 2024 at 20:41:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

 


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Aikataulu viidentenä päivänä ehdotuksen lisäämisen jälkeen

edit 
Thu 26 Dec → Tue 31 Dec
Fri 27 Dec → Wed 01 Jan
Sat 28 Dec → Thu 02 Jan
Sun 29 Dec → Fri 03 Jan
Mon 30 Dec → Sat 04 Jan
Tue 31 Dec → Sun 05 Jan

Aikataulu yhdeksäntenä päivänä ehdotuksen lisäämisen jälkeen

edit 
Sun 22 Dec → Tue 31 Dec
Mon 23 Dec → Wed 01 Jan
Tue 24 Dec → Thu 02 Jan
Wed 25 Dec → Fri 03 Jan
Thu 26 Dec → Sat 04 Jan
Fri 27 Dec → Sun 05 Jan
Sat 28 Dec → Mon 06 Jan
Sun 29 Dec → Tue 07 Jan
Mon 30 Dec → Wed 08 Jan
Tue 31 Dec → Thu 09 Jan
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Ehdokkaat_suositelluiksi_kuviksi&oldid=619845511"