Commons:Deletion requests/mobile tracking/archive/2021-2

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Bosco Verticale

These images depict a building in Milan (it:Bosco verticale) by architect it:Stefano Boeri who is still alive. In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in this case.

Stefan4 (talk) 15:43, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete--Dega180 (talk) 18:55, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Raoli ✉ (talk) 19:05, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Bosco Verticale

There is no freedom of panorama in Italy. At least one architect of the Bosco Verticale, en:Stefano Boeri, is still living. Won"t be PD in Italy for at least 70 years.

~ Rob₁₃^Talk 16:00, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:55, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Bosco Verticale

The building was completed in 2014, by architect Stefano Boeri (1956–). Sadly, there is no freedom of panorama in Italy, therefore permission from him is required.

A1Cafel (talk) 06:31, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ə XPLICIT 11:30, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Bosco Verticale

There is no complete freedom of panorama for free uses of architecture or public art in Italy. IMO the building is creative enough to be eligible for copyright. The author, w:en:Stefano Boeri, is still alive unfortunately.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib"s.) 10:30, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 16:33, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Bosco Verticale

Unfortunately there"s no FOP in Italy and the architect of this building, Stefano Boeri, seems to still be alive. So these images are copyrighted until an undernimmed date.

Adamant1 (talk) 16:45, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep File:Garibaldi repubblica 01 (7211871980).jpg per de minimis.--Friniate (talk) 13:55, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You think that"s just an image of the trees and the buildings have nothing to do with it? Lol. --Adamant1 (talk) 14:29, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It"s an image of the landscape, besides the trees there are other 2 skyscrapers clearly more visible than the copyrighted building. Friniate (talk) 18:05, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The building on the other side of the image is also copyrighted. If not also the building in the middle. So it"s not like it matters since the image is a copyright violation either way. Or are you going to argue the only thing that matters are the dark, blurry trees in the foreground? Or maybe the photographer was just taking a photograph of the street lamp that"s barely even part of it to begin with? --Adamant1 (talk) 18:34, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete All, including File:Garibaldi repubblica 01 (7211871980).jpg,which is not a trivial size, therefore not de minimis COM:DM. In addition, the other two buildings may also be copyrighted and should be deleted per COM:PCP Thanks, -- Ooligan (talk) 20:28, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok to delete others, but File:Milano 11-2011 - panoramio.jpg, File:Garibaldi repubblica 01 (7211871980).jpg, File:Porta Nuova WIP.jpg it"s a panoramic photo who don"t have the boeri"s building or other building to exclusive and central subject. The precautionary principle is fine but it"s a bit exaggerated; which it is a freedom paranorma of a street and a night-evening a public park, which are in the background in the background and also partially covered by plants and in a corner: it may be a "sly artifice" of the photographer, but according to Italian jurisprudence they are potentially acceptable. Therefore these could be there, or in any case they should be explored in depth with another discussion-procedure, because if for some they are not consistent with the guidelines it is a "photofinish" issue. 5.90.136.54 12:57, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:42, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kumlokk D400 Ulefos med snø 2.jpg

Uploaded twice because of app error PeterFisk (talk) 16:27, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: and redirected. --Ju Ta 10:51, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kumlokk 40 Ulefos med snø 2.jpg

Uploaded twice because of app error PeterFisk (talk) 16:27, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: and redirected. --Ju Ta 10:50, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DroidFuzzing4 (talk · contribs)

Out of scope. Artwork without obvious educational use.

SCP-2000 05:01, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:34, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Street Newspaper Shop at Dhaka.jpg

This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion whether this kind of images has really to be considered a legally questionable derivative or the copyrighted elements might be de minimis. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:56, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Similar cases:

Hello, the photograph "Primera edición del diario La República de Montevideo" is my own, and this is the version of an analog photograph that I personally took. I could have chosen to scan on the 35mm negative, but I preferred to scan a print I made on photographic paper. And as for the content, it is merely informative, and it has no economic value, since they are authentic newspapers displayed on a newsstand, just as the seller himself placed them. I did not intervene in the arrangement of the newspapers, or in anything. In fact, I came across the newsstand by chance, and there is no close-up of any newspaper, it is a photographic composition as artistic as possible of an everyday event. A newspaper and magazine stand in a neighborhood of Montevideo, Uruguay in the late 1980s. I feel uncomfortable with this controversy, because there is not only good faith in everything, the photographic work it"s mine and it"s my personal work. But in the content, which does not include any close-up of commercial interest. On the contrary, photography has a certain testimonial value, since almost all communication companies are now totally disappeared. I hope this photographic work of mine and personal is justly appreciated. I apologize in advance, as this translation is an automatic Google Translate translation. Respectful regards for all, --NewAngus (talk) 11:51, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: These images are not intended to show the content of the Newspaper, but show the way they are or can be presented in various situations. I consider the content of the newspapers as De minimis. So the images can be kept. --Elly (talk) 21:33, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:François Bernier-.jpg

pas de référence à la source primaire Jpak (talk) 18:36, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jpak Source: {{Own}} -akko (talk) 12:56, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: attribution was wrong indeed. I corrected it. This is a work by famous French painter Ingres and in PD. Image could be kept. --Elly (talk) 21:55, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:François Bernier-.jpg

In a previous DR, I kept this image, because it is an old painting of Ingres and in PD. However, I found out that this is the same painting as File:Bernier-Ingres-1800.jpg, The current painting is wrongly documented. There is a person Francois Bernier. This painting concerns fr:Pierre-François Bernier and not fr:François Bernier (philosophe). It appears best to delete this image, because it is Redundant, and not used correctly on the projects. Elly (talk) 22:42, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:15, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Smoked oyster and cheddar cheese on Triscuit - Massachusetts 2.jpg

As uploader, I made a mistake. This file is a duplicate and should be deleted. Apologies and thanks.... Daderot (talk) 20:04, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; next time you can tag it as SD G7. --Gbawden (talk) 08:38, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Road .jpg

No possible way to know where the photo was taken, and blurry as well. No realistic educational use. Kissa21782 (talk) 13:06, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:48, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pallabi Dutta.Baruah (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused low quality photos of not so rare subjects.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 06:14, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vansh Som 16.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 12:51, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Tour CMA-CGM

These images show a building in France (w:CMA CGM Tower) from 2011. The architect, w:Zaha Hadid, is still alive. In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in this case.

Stefan4 (talk) 16:09, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Tour CMA-CGM

This picture depicts a monument designed by Zaha Hadid (1950-2016), an architect who died less than 70 years ago. This work of art is copyrighted and, as there is no Freedom of panorama in France, it won"t be freely shared before 1st January 2087. For this reason, this picture must be removed from Wikimedia Commons.

Pymouss Let’s talk - 11:27, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, je comprends, il s"agit de lieux que l"on ne peut pas photographier je suppose, ok pour les enlever--Sophiedidacressources (talk) 18:24, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from talk page by JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib"s.) 09:03, 17 October 2024 (UTC), in accordance with Commons:Village pump/Proposals/Archive/2023/11#Disabling talk pages of deletion requests.[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:47, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Tour CMA-CGM

The building was completed by architect Zaha Hadid (1950–2016) in 2011. Unfortunately, there is no freedom of panorama in France. The copyright term in the country lasted for 70 years, and the images can be undeleted in 2087.

A1Cafel (talk) 02:47, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I vaguely recall that it"s OK when the building isn"t finished yet, like with File:Le Port (3635833798).jpg? Vera ^(talk) 05:31, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The building in the image already displays most of the permanent exterior architecture, IMO they are subject to copyright. --A1Cafel (talk) 01:07, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note. I have removed File:Tours La Marseillaise et CMA-CGM.jpg from en:La Marseillaise (skyscraper) per nomination. Thank you. Samuelsp15 (talk) 11:07, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:26, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Tour CMA-CGM

COM:FOP France: recent structures.

RZuo (talk) 20:04, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:02, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:The Life Electric

The sculpture was completed by artist Daniel Libeskind (1946–) in 2015. Unfortunately, there is no freedom of panorama in Italy, thus permission from him is required.

A1Cafel (talk) 03:05, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Kept: no valid reason for deletion: there is a WLM permission. @A1Cafel: Besides the fact that FoP in Italy is quite complex and not so straightforward, please double check the single files first before doing any other mass deletion. Thanks. Ruthven (msg) 08:21, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:محمد حسونه شهوب.png

A small number of personal images is ok, but this seems to be going well beyond that. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 08:35, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:44, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Copyright By - Nguyễn Hữu Kiên.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:06, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 00:39, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Tokyo Disneyland during the COVID-19 pandemic

No FOP for artwork in Japan

Elisfkc (talk) 18:18, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, but two files are kept. File number 2 does not surpass threshold of originality, per COM:CSM#Food photos of food are generally acceptable. File 13 is typical fingerpost, ineligible due to simplicity. Taivo (talk) 15:02, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Illiteracy 2.jpg

out of scope - no educational use - possibly some school advert, along with plain text image File:Lack of knowledge.jpg. Pibwl (talk) 20:43, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:56, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]