Commons:Deletion requests/File:Potassium stannate.png
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Chemically incorrect: the two angled bonds would connect to the Sn itself directly, not th each other first. Have File:Potassium stannate.svg DMacks (talk) 00:13, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
ย Delete. It has a chemistry error and it is unused. Marbletan (talk) 15:28, 19 January 2022 (UTC)- Not sure where any bonds are connecting "to each other", but the low quality of this image and existence of way better alternatives makes educational use unlikely. ย Delete. ๐๐ค๐ฏ๐บ๐ช๐ค๐๐๐ท๐ฎ๐ฅ๐๐บ๐ด๐๐๐ฐ (๐๐ฎ๐ญ๐ ) 00:03, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- @1234qwer1234qwer4: any place that bonds come together, there must be an atom. The two lines from the left-hand oxygens come together to each other, with that juncture being adjacent to the tin atom. So there is something there where those two lines meet: by en:skeletal diagram standards, that would be a carbon atom. If the intended meaning is that both O bond to the Sn, then the two lines individually go to the Sn directly, not to each otehr first. Compare File:Methoxymethane 200.svg to File:Aceton.svg. DMacks (talk) 15:07, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- @DMacks Well, fair enough, though if there was a carbon atom there, there would be another clearly visible separate bond to the Sn from where the lines meet. I suppose the problem is not that they connect "to each otehr first" (I would describe that as meeting each other and the Sn simultaneously), but that they meet at all. In any case, that falls under the poor drawing of the image. ๐๐ค๐ฏ๐บ๐ช๐ค๐๐๐ท๐ฎ๐ฅ๐๐บ๐ด๐๐๐ฐ (๐๐ฎ๐ญ๐ ) 17:36, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- @1234qwer1234qwer4: any place that bonds come together, there must be an atom. The two lines from the left-hand oxygens come together to each other, with that juncture being adjacent to the tin atom. So there is something there where those two lines meet: by en:skeletal diagram standards, that would be a carbon atom. If the intended meaning is that both O bond to the Sn, then the two lines individually go to the Sn directly, not to each otehr first. Compare File:Methoxymethane 200.svg to File:Aceton.svg. DMacks (talk) 15:07, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- ย Delete per nom. We have a high-quality replacement as well. โ Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 10:07, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:04, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
