Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bittbrief an TLG2.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bittbrief an TLG2.jpg

This file was initially tagged by ThT as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: out of scope and violation of privacy by publication of private data. The file has been 11 years in Commons and deserves a regular deletion request. Taivo (talk) 16:01, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Es handelt sich hierbei um ein historisch bedeutsames Familiendokument der "Plessen-Family", das geschichtsfest dokumentiert, wie sich meine verstorbene Mutter um Ihr kulturelles Erbe (Rittergut Dolgen) ehrbar & uneigennützig eingesetzt hatte. Ich bin Rechtsnachfolger der toten Frau und sehe keinerlei Rechtsverstöße in dieser ehrbaren und relevanten Sache. --Gordito1869 (talk) 06:31, 17 September 2020 (UTC) - dieser Brief wurde ferner von mir im Entwurf und zur Unterschrift selbst erstellt, wie anhand meiner Paraphierung in der Mitzeichnungsleiste eindeutig erkennbar ist. gez. Michael Pfeiffer alias Gordito1869 Gordito1869 (talk) 06:54, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: As mentioned by the uploader ([1]) it is a family paper documenting a single part of a real estate business. I can detect no useful educational purpose which would fall into the scope of commons (Commons:Project scope). Furthermore I was not able to find any indication of historical research by public institutions or scholarly organisations regarding the Rittergut Dolgen and its ownership after 1945 and connected with these private family papers. The file was removed from a subject category ([2]) by another user already. The usage of this file and other private documents which were deleted (Löschung von PDFs) was always restricted on links (or inclusions) to the user page or user talk page of the uploader. On these pages the uploader argues against living members of the Plessen family by using the private family papers as supposed evidence. The user w:de:user:Gordito1869 was blocked indefinetely because of personal attacks. --ThT (talk) 13:25, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader himself characterized the controversy about the real estate business which is related to this document as a family affair ([3] in German). Furthermore the chairman of the family association confirmed, that he doesn't know of any historical research of public institutions or scholarly organizations referring to the ownership of the former knightly estate Dolgen after 1945 ([4] in German). For these reasons I cannot see any educational purpose of this document. --ThT (talk) 15:57, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ThT : This person is not the "chairman" of Dolgener Plessen. I think why this person shows no interest in Dolgen and the historical documents could perhaps result from this in "signs and hints" ... but historians or honorable family members may judge that, not me. - That is beyond the consideration of Commons, as is your erroneous assumption about YOUR Dolgener "chairman". --Gordito1869 (talk) 07:20, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:17, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]