Commons:Deletion requests/File:At the nudist beach.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:At the nudist beach.jpg

Nomination for speedy deletion gave as reason only "inappropriate image" without explaining what was supposed to be inappropriate about it. Seems to be an attempt at censorship.

I believe the image should be kept. Keep AdeMiami (talk) 08:04, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The additional reason is given on the tag. Go look.--HappyLogolover2011 (talk) 23:22, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The full reason given is "Inappropriate image. sexy and nude image is not allowed." In fact, nudity is allowed. There are hundreds of such photos here. There's even a category for it. So still no sufficient reason for deletion. --Ebyabe (talk) 14:59, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Info The current delete request comes from User:71.94.172.52 who erroneously added comments to the closed discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/Image:At the nudist beach.jpg. The newest comments read "Sorry but thats not good and theres rules about that here. Mediawiki can take it down very easily. So therefore it needs to be deleted." Then User:71.94.172.52 tagged the file for speedy deletion with the reason "Inappropiate image". A couple of users have clouded the issue somewhat by deleting the speedy deletion tag twice. User:71.94.172.52 had added the edit comment "Theres rules about that picture and should not be allowed on the site." when restoring his request for deletion. I will restore the original intent "Inappropriate image" to the current delete tag. I will also post a message on the user's talk page asking for clarification on what rule he believes this violates. --Arg342 (talk) 09:05, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Info Image was previously listed for deletion and kept. Commons:Deletion requests/Image:At the nudist beach.jpg. Infrogmation (talk) 12:08, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per previous listing; free licensed image in use in multiple projects; no reason offered for deletion beyond anon's apparent dislike of nudity and mistaken belief that such is "not allowed". Infrogmation (talk) 12:08, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Sorry but thats not good and theres rules about that here. Mediawiki can take it down very easily. So therefore it needs to be deleted.--71.94.172.52 04:08, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Above comment is by the deletion nominator; I moved it here to the current discussion from Commons:Deletion requests/Image:At the nudist beach.jpg Infrogmation (talk) 12:11, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could we please be given a reason for this delete. Which rule? What is inappropriate? I didn,t see a geotag but that is optional.--ClemRutter (talk) 12:28, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I see no valid reason of deletion. Nudism is a subject that is in the scope. And nude in public makes the picture acceptable in terms of rights of the person. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 13:41, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep no valid reason for deletion has been given. No personality rights issues. In use on one or more Wikimedia projects = in scope. Thryduulf (talk) 15:04, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Uh the reason is sexy and nude image. Thats the reason it should be deleted and i gave a valid reason by the way so now you guys know its not allowed.--71.94.172.52 18:30, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Which rule? What is inappropriate? Uh the reason is sexy and nude image is a point of view. All wikipedia policies are written down on a page, they have been discussed on a talk page, and when I ask for a rule I want you to direct me to the page where the policy is written down so I can read it. We must verify the information. Until then there is no argument to answer.--ClemRutter (talk) 22:23, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Still no valid reason for deletion that I can see. As I read it, this is within the scope of Commons. In particular COM:CENSORSHIP clearly allows this.--Arg342 (talk) 22:42, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nothing's changed since the discussion 3 years ago. --Ebyabe (talk) 00:06, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment FYI, the same user also request a speedy delete of this image, because it contained nudity. It seems the user is under the impression that nude images shouldn't be here, period. --Ebyabe (talk) 17:49, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There's nothing to discuss until we know, in the proposer's opinion, which rule has been broken and how it has been broken.--SueTwo (talk) 14:49, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I support the opinions expressed by users User:Infrogmation, User:ClemRutter and User:SueTwo. Regards, Kmw2700 (talk) 17:03, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No rule broken. --Salocin ^Diskussion 11:50, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep These appear to be nudists/naturists nude at a nudist/naturist location and not acting sexually or offensively. Therefore acceptable under Wiki rules and clearly/explicitly described by the image title. Tim Forcer (talk) 16:31, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept Anon has gained no support for deletion, and has failed to provide any evidence for their repeated claim that it in violation of "rules" nor what those "rules" might be. No Commons policies favoring deletion have been cited. Infrogmation (talk) 16:00, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:At the nudist beach.jpg

Naked young woman 86.168.178.67 16:08, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy kept, per previous DR with broad concensus. Commons is not censored. Also, file in use. --Amitie 10g (talk) 01:34, 7 March 2015 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)[reply]