Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/09/23

Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive September 23rd, 2024
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The woman on the picture is not aware of the photo Sneakygingerb (talk) 02:19, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete - COM:NOCREEPSHOTS, and it's an objectively bad photo (bizarre angle, face crudely scribbled out). Now please explain why you uploaded this photo in the first place. Omphalographer (talk) 02:32, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: G7. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:02, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-created artwork without obvious educational use: self proposed flag for a personal project of the user that does not exist in real life DovaModaal (talk) 02:35, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:05, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-created artwork without obvious educational use: self proposed flag for a personal project of the user that does not exist in real life DovaModaal (talk) 02:35, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:05, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo is expectly from Mapherson, delete unless the author is live in there

除非作者居住於麥花巨,否則照片須隨時刪除 — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 124.217.189.221 (talk) 02:24, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Big photo with metadata, seems own work. Nominator is blocked as sockpuppet. Taivo (talk) 08:30, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete argee with Mafalda4144, ad photo 103.250.52.218 08:03, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep, no reason to believe that the uploader didn't take the photo. Belbury (talk) 08:11, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete support Mafalda4144 103.250.52.218 08:14, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This photo is uploaded by a sock puppet of Cheng123xx, Wing1991hk 103.250.52.218 08:45, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The uploader, since renamed to User:Wpcpey, is not blocked or tagged for any sockpuppetry. --Belbury (talk) 08:58, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:36, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vandalism only, self edited and diracted 103.250.52.218 07:32, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Vandalism, IP blocked. --Achim55 (talk) 14:16, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam keystrokes Dronebogus (talk) 15:33, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 16:33, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ortsteil Polsum ist falsch dargestellt. Der "Polsumer Entenschnabel" fehlt. Der Ortsteil geht 'schnabelförmig' bis zur Lippe. Hier hatte mal jemand gar keine Ahnung 147.161.254.188 08:50, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Offenkundiger Trollantrag.
  • 1.) Die Karte stellt nicht die ehemaligen Gemarkungen von 1960 dar (heute ist Polsum komplett Gemarkung Marl), sondern heutige Stadtteile.
  • 2.) Deletion Request wäre selbst bei Fehlern in der Karte grob mißbräuchlich.
Bitte schnellentfernen, da gibt es nichts zu diskutieren! Elop (talk) 09:07, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 18:36, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Photo of a copyrighted book cover Masti (talk) 10:47, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Masur (talk) 16:58, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Файл не нужен D.Shmelev (talk) 11:02, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:04, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Saual123 (talk) 12:27, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, low resolution & quality. --Achim55 (talk) 19:04, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

性的で個人のものあるため Eidan205series (talk) 04:41, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

性的で、個人的なものであるため。 Eidan205series (talk) 08:28, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 09:50, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The audio has stopped playing on it so I just reuploaded the file again - and the second file is working. Darren J. Prior (talk) 19:19, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:43, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nominated for deletion. 2001:8004:1245:3E65:E81F:5334:F165:4599 05:09, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep per Ikan Kekek.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 04:20, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Missing reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 12:09, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original owner requesting deletion for privacy reasons 2403:5814:C192:0:7C8D:4F3A:BA2:DBE0 18:31, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep Lack of evidence that IP 2403:5814:C192:0:7C8D:4F3A:BA2:DBE0 is the "owner" of whatever. Taylor 49 (talk) 23:16, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am the original uploader, this picture appears when you search my real name and I’m no longer comfortable with it. I’ve already emailed the wikimedia admins so hoping they’re able to get this page removed. Thanks 2403:5814:C192:0:8913:6D1D:C618:853B 14:41, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
sorry, made another deletion request don't know how this all works {speedydelete|1=Privacy concern - Case 88019}
I originally uploaded this years ago and this picture appears when you search my real full name and I’m not comfortable with it. I’ve already emailed the Wikimedia admins so hoping they’re able to get this page removed 1.136.105.180 19:15, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Privacy concerns have been addressed by means of suppression, no need to delete the file. If your former username is the problem, then it can be resolved by other means too. Taylor 49 (talk) 20:50, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
yes but that's only half the problem solved, this pic still has some sort of link to my full name on google... why can't it be deleted if it's not in use anywhrre 1.136.105.108 21:02, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment It takes some time until it disappears from Google. If you consent into keeping, I can close this deletion proposal, and rename the file immediatey, so that damn Google won't find it anymore. Taylor 49 (talk) 21:17, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I mean, the wiki account with my name has been deleted for about 5 years now, surely that's enough time for google to update? 2403:5814:C192:0:4959:D28F:FA7A:1C3B 21:22, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
but sure rename it, im guessing you've probably dealt with google being tricky before. thanks again 2403:5814:C192:0:4959:D28F:FA7A:1C3B 21:23, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept per agreement in favor of rename and other suppressions. Taylor 49 (talk) 21:36, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reverse image search shows this to be a very widely used YouTube usericon, original source unclear. Belbury (talk) 15:26, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 07:59, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicated file, want to delete WinterGoose (talk) 09:48, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:29, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:12, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


I agree with you, in principle. However, it may belong to a user from the species called adminii omnipotentiae, and in that case it would somehow happen to be in scope. 186.173.93.226 08:19, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete very bad image Dronebogus (talk) 10:53, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: Poor quality. --Achim55 (talk) 18:25, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by User:The Squirrel Conspiracy. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:39, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:03, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:16, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:40, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:40, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:40, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:41, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:22, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:41, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:22, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:41, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:22, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:42, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:22, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:42, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cover of a book with rights  Mohammed Qays  🗣 03:25, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:42, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:26, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:43, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Rwanda A1Cafel (talk) 03:27, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:20, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Rwanda A1Cafel (talk) 03:27, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:20, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Iran A1Cafel (talk) 03:29, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:43, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 03:33, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:20, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:34, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:20, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:36, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:20, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:37, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:20, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by ZioNicco as no source (No source since) Krd 04:54, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Without source, without author, the date of publication is unclear, it is therefore not possible to understand when it expired, it is not 120 years given that it is unknown.
On it.wiki it was deleted (where it came from) because it lacked information. ZioNicco (talk) 06:41, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep PD-Italy Italy only awards 20 years of protection, so if the image is more than 20 years old it is PD in Italy and the USA. He died in 1924, 100 years ago. --RAN (talk) 18:01, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per RAN. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:45, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: AI-generated fantasy image used in a deleted hoax article on hrwiki (hr:Kronor). Omphalographer (talk) 05:02, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:45, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of non-free content A1Cafel (talk) 05:12, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:45, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1964 photo, not own work Gbawden (talk) 11:29, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:21, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused logo. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:21, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Copyrighted logo of the school it represents, and not the work of the uploader. Even if the uploader created it, it's a copy of the original. Copyright violation. Hammersoft (talk) 22:14, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:22, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I guess the logo is PD-textlogo but the background is likely copyrighted and not covered by PD-textlogo. Jonteemil (talk) 22:50, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:22, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. Copyright status needs to be sorted out if it should be kept. Jonteemil (talk) 22:55, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:22, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is very blurry without obvious educational use. Conan Wolff (talk) 13:41, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unusable poor quality, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:04, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is very blurry and without obvious educational use. Conan Wolff (talk) 13:48, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unusable poor quality, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:04, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is very blurry and without obvious educational use. Conan Wolff (talk) 13:53, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unusable poor quality, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:05, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-created artwork without obvious educational use. Conan Wolff (talk) 13:56, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: unusable poor quality, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:05, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a blurry image without obvious educational use and better quality images of the same subject are available. Conan Wolff (talk) 15:02, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. Useless image. ~TheImaCow (talk) 17:03, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unusable poor quality, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:07, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo likely uploaded for spam purposes, out of the project scope Nutshinou Talk! 16:55, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete as F4, and F1. Linked source literally has an all rights reserved copyright notice on it. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 04:56, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: SPAM, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:08, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chigozie ohams (talk · contribs)

edit

Self-promotion. Commons is not your personal free web host. No contributions to wm projects.

Achim55 (talk) 18:47, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:09, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE

(talk) 20:08, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:14, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by The Muslim Giant (talk · contribs)

edit

Low quality unused emoji kitchen emojis

(talk) 20:15, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:15, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage outside sandbox, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:03, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:17, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:15, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:18, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM; self promotional logo, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:18, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:18, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:22, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. Taylor 49 (talk) 23:25, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:19, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RO92MLVA1011 (talk · contribs)

edit

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:40, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:20, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP for sculptures and other artworks in the United States.

Darwin Ahoy! 01:30, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:18, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP for sculptures and other artworks in the United States.

Darwin Ahoy! 01:37, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:18, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP for sculptures and other artworks in the United States.

Darwin Ahoy! 01:41, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


KEEP These are not permanent artworks places in public for long periods. They are from a festival. Victorgrigas (talk) 23:40, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:19, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP for sculptures and other artworks in the United States.

Darwin Ahoy! 01:42, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:19, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP for sculptures and other artworks in the United States.

Darwin Ahoy! 01:43, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:19, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP for sculptures and other artworks in the United States.

Darwin Ahoy! 01:53, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete given Burning Man's concern about commodification, and the organization's co-copyright (under their terms of use) on these artworks, there is no way these can be put under any license allowing commercial use, even if the creators signed off. Kind of sad, but that comes with the terrain of us being as committed as we are to free licensing, and them taking a different angle. - Jmabel ! talk 14:49, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:19, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP for sculptures and other artworks in the United States.

Darwin Ahoy! 01:55, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:19, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP for sculptures and other artworks in the United States.

Darwin Ahoy! 01:58, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:20, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP for sculptures and other artworks in the United States.

Darwin Ahoy! 02:02, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:20, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP for sculptures and other artworks in the United States.

Darwin Ahoy! 02:05, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:20, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:35, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


I'd say just blur out the billboard and call it a day. This image has legitimate use and it is not being used to illustrate something that violates COM:DEMINIMIS. If the thing was used on googly eyes or Geico it would tell a different story. The rest of the streetscape need not be deleted to bring this image in compliance with commons policy. Aasim (talk) 04:22, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I tried to make the same case regarding File:Parsons Blvd; IND Queens Blvd; 153rd Buses Red Arrow.jpg. I replaced it with a cropped version that cuts out the ads, but it loses the impact without a full view. Unfortunately, this issue is being ignored by the editor who tagged it. --DanTD (talk) 17:57, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If the intention is to display the copyrighted part, then please obtain permission from the copyright holder. Krd 09:22, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:22, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Alachuckthebuck as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10/G10}}=={{int:filedesc Yann (talk) 18:20, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this file not F10/G10? All the Best -- Chuck Talk 20:54, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 08:28, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User with bad history, small files without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 09:13, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: I tagged many photos of this user for copyvio deletion, most of their uploads are copyvios through Google Lens searches. Another example: File:Sri Rajarajeswari Alankaram.jpg is a copyvio as well. Myrealnamm-alt (talk) 17:47, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy delete Blatant copyvios, uploader blocked. 185.172.241.184 16:21, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Fit India 14:20, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Magicmorz (talk · contribs)

edit

Highly dubious claim of own work. File:Hagari looking sharp.jpg found here https://www.bbc.com/news/live/world-middle-east-67385263?ns_campaign=bbc_live&ns_fee=0&ns_linkname=655079451ec331355f962adb&UN says its office in Gaza shelled&2023-11-12T07:11:57.045Z&ns_mchannel=social&ns_source=twitter&pinned_post_asset_id=655079451ec331355f962adb&pinned_post_locator=urn:asset:4dca6cc8-2914-449b-b4f7-b86cd728c8e7&pinned_post_type=share File:Mepro mor pro idf.jpg found here https://fragoutmag.com/israel-acquiring-iwi-micro-tavor-x95-assault-rifles-for-idf-infantry-brigades/

99̥ with no exif, PCP

Gbawden (talk) 09:18, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom and precautionary principle All the Best -- Chuck Talk 04:42, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Fit India 14:19, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We need proof of OGL. The source given is (C) but credits the DoEducation - but we need a source to confirm the OGL claim

Gbawden (talk) 09:57, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Fit India 14:20, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MartinH1952 (talk · contribs)

edit

Modern stamp designs, not free yet

Gbawden (talk) 10:01, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Fit India 14:20, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of the copyrighted artworks in the Kismif posters. The majority of the image is filled up with copyrighted artwork, in some cases it's almost everything visible. I don't think de minimis can apply here.

Darwin Ahoy! 14:02, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom All the Best -- Chuck Talk 04:48, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Fit India 14:21, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP for sculptures and other artworks in the United States.

Darwin Ahoy! 14:10, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Fit India 14:22, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pierszim (talk · contribs)

edit

Unused personal images/selfies, out of the project scope

Nutshinou Talk! 16:39, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Fit India 14:23, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Clach996644 (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of scope: unused AI-generated images used in low-quality AI-driven edits which have been rejected across multiple wikis, e.g. kg:Special:Diff/46809.

Omphalographer (talk) 20:44, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Fit India 14:24, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fireworksice (talk · contribs)

edit

Unused, nonsensical AI-generated illustrations, a made-up logo and three blurry images of household objects, out of the project scope

Nutshinou Talk! 23:46, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Fit India 14:24, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio © schuesslerFotoscheune - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 21:35, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:19, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Ganesh Gwoda (talk) 06:27, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 19:17, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Auf Wunsch des Hochladenden wegen Artefakten Gisbert K (talk) 08:49, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:17, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Неверно указал фамилию D.Shmelev (talk) 11:26, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 19:16, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files with the text or melody of East Germany's national anthem, which is still protected by copyright. The lyricist died in 1958, the composer in 1962, so this is still protected until the beginning of 2033, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2033. Sangjinhwa (talk) 14:06, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Based on prior information, this song is not protected by copyright so it should be stayed up.
Sources: https://germanhistory-intersections.org/en/germanness/ghis:audio-5#:~:text=This work has been identified,all related and neighboring rights. Also, since the song was the anthem of East Germany, it could be identified as a public symbol rather than a commercially protected work. Therefore, its use for non-commercial, educational, or public history purposes should be unrestricted.
Additionally, some websites (like the one I mentioned above) have identified the song as having no copyright restrictions at all, given its status as a political and/or national symbol. Consequently, this provides permission to use it in various contexts, like that of other national anthems. Zechchuber (talk) 19:24, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The composer died in 1958, the lyricist in 1962, so the song is still protected in Germany until the end of 2032. That it was the East German anthem does not mean it's free of copyright, not in Germany at least. Also, the audio recording of this specific performance (by the "Großer Chor des Berliner Rundfunks" per Youtube) is most likely (depending on the year, which we are not told) still protected by a performance copyright in Germany and the US (Commons:Hirtle chart#Sound recordings). --Rosenzweig τ 19:13, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrightholder (Günter König) is not uploader, no permission visible Alabasterstein (talk) 15:09, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 19:05, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1920s or early 1930s German photograph, not an own work of the uploader. Possibly public domain in Germany, would need more information to determine copyright status. Abzeronow (talk) 19:43, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: not enough information to determine the copyright status of this photo. Georg Rückert apparently died in 1932, so the file can be restored in 2053 with PD-old-assumed. --Rosenzweig τ 19:02, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

text-only content, out of the project scope Nutshinou Talk! 19:59, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:00, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Title is incorrect GatewayPolitics (talk) 21:27, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:59, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

most probably grabbed from the web: no proper meta data etc. published on July 7 on https://www.skyscrapercity.com/posts/189143981/ and in much higher resolution on https://imgur.com/6mLvpC3 – probably better to check also other uploads by this user Albinfo (talk) 22:10, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep sorry, it's not the same image. no other version of this image found on the web. Albinfo (talk) 22:13, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Then you should withdraw the deletion request by typing {{withdraw}} -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:37, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination --Albinfo (talk) 17:31, 24 September 2024 (UTC) (thank you for the hint!)[reply]


Kept: nomination was withdrawn. --Rosenzweig τ 18:58, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

F3 G3, the pic is a meme referring to Mohamed Bouazizi 196.115.83.51 22:29, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 18:58, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: various user-created images bearing motivational quotes (some of which are rather strange!); all are unused outside userspace and have no clear educational purpose. A lot of these also use unsourced background images, making them derivative works.

Omphalographer (talk) 04:09, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Posters by definition are derivative ("Typically, posters include both textual and graphic elements"), so this in itself is not a valid reason for deletion. One could request deletion of all theatre posters as well, because they are derivative. Some posters in this list are my files and they are properly tagged as own work. They are based on my own photos, so I'm not sure, what more to write in the file description.
This, for example is a photo of an actual sign in a university: File:Buen día.jpg. It might be discussed whether it's a "motivational poster" (probably rather a motivational sign), but as a photo of real sign in a real university, it does have educational purpose. Tupungato (talk) 08:08, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. I kept a few which are used on user pages. --Yann (talk) 07:19, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No use anywhere Henry2106 (talk) 12:32, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid deletion reason; unwanted information has now been removed. --odder (talk) 15:43, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:30, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:39, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. This is her Spotify display photo and it was posted on Instagram on 24 April 2024. Dxneo (talk) 04:09, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:31, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same picture used in school's official page, so I doubt this is Uploader's original creation. Not so sure whether this can be Speedy deleted. Aspere (talk) 08:17, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:32, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Póster?.. 186.173.225.155 11:18, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:34, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Diario La Hora 186.173.225.155 11:19, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:35, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Póster?.. 186.173.225.155 11:20, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:35, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a blurry version of File:Egyptian Museum (009).jpg. פעמי-עליון (talk) 14:35, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:37, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file promotes nudity and does not adhere to Wikimedia Commons' policies regarding inappropriate or explicit content. It is not suitable for a public platform like Wikimedia Commons, which should remain accessible and respectful to all audiences, including minors. Additionally, this image does not have any educational, historical, or artistic value that justifies its inclusion. Arijit Kisku (talk) 14:53, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Naturism is the promotion of nudity as a natural state. This content is appropriate and it doesn't disrespect anyone. This image has the following values: artistic (professional photography), referential (naturism and female anatomy), educational (female anatomy). Wikimedia is an objective platform that is not dictated by cultural or religious beliefs. BikiniCollection (talk) 11:18, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:38, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Kevin Feige (48462887397) (cropped).jpg erroneously tagged as self-published. Currently not used in any wiki namespace. Trailblazer101 (talk) 02:51, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have subsequently tagged this file a a duplicate and have as such requested speedy deletion. Trailblazer101 (talk) 10:03, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 21:09, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader appears to credit the file to "Courtesy of Evan Ciampaglia", but I'm not able to find evidence of the free license at the listed source. The flag is going to be above COM:TOO in any relevant jurisdiction, with a fairly complex rendering of St. George and the Dragon. As such, I propose that this be deleted for lack of evidence of a free license, in line with COM:PRP. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:18, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Red-tailed hawkThis particular version comes from Reddit (although a similar flag is used in reality), Evan Ciampaglia is the author of the file who consented to my publishing it.Betelgeuse2003 (talk) 05:57, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Betelgeuse2003, in that case, it is required that the copyright holder release the rights of the file via COM:VRT. Ratekreel (talk) 18:01, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:47, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyvio: image is based on a commonly used press photo of w:Earl Nightingale (not "Nightingle"!), e.g. [1]. Unclear that the source web site would have had rights to license it as CC-BY-SA; unable to confirm as it's no longer online and isn't available in the Wayback Machine. Omphalographer (talk) 04:02, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:48, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused globe icon with an inexplicable filename and description; plenty of others like it (Category:SVG sphere wireframes, Category:SVG globe icons, etc). Omphalographer (talk) 04:07, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:48, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nothing visible Qualitätssicherung (talk) 06:39, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:48, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Mohamed Muizzu meets Ranil Wickremesinghe in November 2023 (6).jpg A1Cafel (talk) 08:23, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: file is already deleted. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:49, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted poster in Dhaka metro station. Possible copyvio Wasiul Bahar (talk) 09:26, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:49, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photographer and the source is unknown, and it looks like it was reprinted from somewhere else. Thyj (talk) 10:06, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:49, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Deletion_requests/File:FpaCL-baEAAgW9k.jpg Thyj (talk) 10:08, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:49, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio https://www.latamarte.com/en/galleries/QuJU/ Golikom (talk) 12:21, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The painter was born in 1964 and is still alive (judging by the wiki page on him). Also worth going through the whole Category:Paintings by Augusto Ferrer-Dalmau because it would all be copyrighted unless there are VRT tickets or the painter regularly releases his works under a cc license. Nakonana (talk) 11:45, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:50, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image now represents a service ribbon image that doesn't (or cannot) exist. There are basically two ways in which clasps that have been awarded can be show represented by stars on the service ribbon: (1) by adding a star for each clasp (2) by adding a star for the first clasp and adding a numeral (2, 3) to the star for a second or third clasp. Since the decree only mentions 'star' in singular, it can be deducted that (2) was meant, hence a service ribbon image with 3 stars representing clasps doesn't exist. Decree Muumi (talk) 12:21, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:50, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No information, no educational context. Also unlikely to have permission from the underage players in this team for their photo to be posted online. -- Deadstar (msg) 12:49, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:50, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No information, no educational context. Also unlikely to have permission from the underage players in this team for their photo to be posted online. -- Deadstar (msg) 12:49, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Giving their look at the camera they all consented to be photographed, thus no privacy invasion. No reason for deletion. Zenwort (talk) 20:18, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I doubt they gave permission for it to be used in all contexts. Still, no information. -- Deadstar (msg) 22:15, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:50, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unclear what who where this is. Image size looks like it is not self-made. Uploader has a history of uploading copyrighted images. -- Deadstar (msg) 13:10, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like a street artist pointing to something during his performance. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 06:09, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
delete COM:Scope --Zenwort (talk) 20:20, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:51, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pornagraph 59.127.98.116 14:50, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete com:penis Dronebogus (talk) 16:14, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: COM:PENIS. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:51, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very probably not created by "SuperNascar 1991" in 2014, but by Fidget in 2001 (as stated in the watermark). bozz (talk) 14:58, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete as a derivative work of copyrighted material and due to evidence that it is not own work. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 04:53, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:51, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The license says the image is from before 1929 but the date on the photo is 2024. I don't think either is correct, and this appears to be COM:FLICKRWASH. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:01, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The link on flicker is now a error 404, make of that what you will. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 04:55, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per nom, All the Best -- Chuck Talk 04:55, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:51, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cropped duplicate of File:Thunderbolts* logo.jpg erroneously tagged as own work. Not currently used in any wiki namespace. Trailblazer101 (talk) 16:37, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:52, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The copyright holder in the Exif metadata is "Malishev Andrey" in File:TardifEV.jpg and File:FilippovVZ1.jpg. File:FilippovVZ3.jpg was also grabbed from Google also per its Exif metadata. The other images were all photographed from different cameras, so "own work" claims seem dubious. Uploader also seems to be the subject in the "TardifEV" images (per username)

Nutshinou Talk! 16:48, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:52, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image resolution is so low, that it is not educationally useful and doesn't have a realistic use. Conan Wolff (talk) 17:52, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:54, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by DMacks as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Seen in [2], which is all-rights-reserved and several years prior to upload here PD-ineligible. Yann (talk) 18:18, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea if this web item is the original source. It was just the first place I found it by google-image search, after realizing how many of this uploader's "own-work" were from diverse uncited sources. I'm not sure if it's PD-ineligible. It's a specific experimental result (whose details are unstated) and novel representation of certain facts of nature. But regardless uploader should not be taking full credit for it (citing it is the only real way to make this have an EDUSE, by having information about what it represents and the experimental details). DMacks (talk) 18:50, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The data can't be under a copyright, only the representation. And I think that a simple representation of the data can't be much different than this. Yann (talk) 20:18, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak  Delete, very low quality diagram, which is unused, and pretty useless too without a more detailed description on what is depicted. From Copyright prespective, I am sure that this is PD-ineligible however. ~TheImaCow (talk) 17:21, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: scope. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:54, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright washing. Lots of derivative work. User:TaronjaSatsuma 2024-09-23T18:44:24


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:55, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not an own work. No scope. 186.175.210.172 21:47, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:56, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was previously published on a National Weather Service website, but the link is now dead and the two Internet Archive snapshots of the page to which it's cited do not contain this image (or anything at all)[3]

The vast majority of photos of damage caused by severe weather events that are published on NWS websites come from their own damage surveys. However, a significant number are provided by third parties, mostly county Emergency Management Agencies, but also county sheriffs' offices, and state-level agencies such as police or departments of transportation. Some are also provided by private citizens sharing their images with the NWS.

We therefore rely heavily on image captions as evidence of ownership of an image, and without this context, we cannot simply assume that a weather damage photo sourced from an NWS website was created by the NWS.

In the absence of any context, we need to approach the NWS regional office that published the image and ask who created it.

In this case they confirmed for me:

  • they still have this image on file
  • it was not created by the NWS
  • they have no record of who created it.

I forwarded this advice to the VRT. (ticket:2024092310011302)

With no evidence that its creator released it into the public domain, and no way to contact them, we need to delete this as a precaution under COM:PRP, at least until a creator can be identified and contacted to negotiate a release into the public domain or under a free license.

If no creator is ever identified, it will pass into the public domain as an orphan work in 2128.

Rlandmann (talk) 22:29, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for 104 years per above. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 22:39, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:56, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is copyrighted. Compare for instance against https://in.bookmyshow.com/ahmedabad/movies/parampara/ET00395179 Super nabla (talk) 23:08, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:56, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was previously published on a National Weather Service website, but the link is now dead and it was never archived by the Internet Archive.[4]

However, the uploader to the Commons noted that the file was credited "Sedgwick County Emergency Management". Agencies of the Kansas state government can hold copyrights over their materials,[5] so I contacted them.

In this case they confirmed for me:

  • they supplied this image to the NWS
  • it was not taken by a County employee, it was supplied to EM by one of their volunteers (whom they did not name)

I forwarded this advice to the VRT. (ticket:2024092110008687)

With no evidence that its creator released it into the public domain, and no way to contact them, we need to delete this as a precaution under COM:PRP, at least until a creator can be identified and contacted to negotiate a release into the public domain or under a free license.

If no creator is ever identified, it will pass into the public domain as an orphan work in 2124. (It isn't clear to me whether the EM knows the name of the volunteer; "identified" here means identified at all, not just by us).


Rlandmann (talk) 23:27, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per above. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 01:35, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:56, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Droit d'auteur requis NalKy (talk) 16:10, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Suppression immédiate NalKy (talk) 19:51, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 14:32, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted Materials: Book covers Michel Bakni (talk) 10:35, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:11, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo: out of the scope of the project Reupload after deletion Michel Bakni (talk) 10:36, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:12, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Name and description with ©CD57. Doesnt looks like CC-BY-SA-4.0 Rwzi (talk) 13:23, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:13, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Name and description with ©CD57. Doesn't look like CC-BY-SA-4.0. Rwzi (talk) 13:25, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:13, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:Redundant. These images are too small and low-quality. Also, SVG version of these images are available on Category:SVG Icon Materials by the Digital Agency. Therefore, when you need PNG version of these images, generating them from SVG images is sufficient and I consider these PNG images redundant. I uploaded these images because they are included in the source. Initially, I thought about requesting COM:GCSD G7, but since that's not possible, I request COM:Redundant.

Momiji-Penguin (talk) 13:34, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Momiji-Penguin (talk) 13:50, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Momiji-Penguin (talk) 14:01, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep SVGs are preferred and just better in every way, but PNGs can still be useful, so if these link to the SVG and vice versa, problem solved. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 04:48, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:15, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Droit d'auteur requis NalKy (talk) 16:38, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: per RAN. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:31, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo. IOIOI (talk) 19:53, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:40, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio © Monika Rittershaus - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 22:41, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo M2k~dewiki, ich habe die Fotografin mit der Bitte um eine Lizenzfreigabe kontaktiert. Die sollte in den nächsten Tagen ausgestellt werden, da ich die Freigabe für das Bild vorab von ihr für diese Verwendung erhalten habe. Pacsolis (talk) 07:08, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: has a VRT permission now. --Rosenzweig τ 14:22, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio © Monika Rittershaus - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 22:42, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo M2k~dewiki, ich habe die Fotografin mit der Bitte um eine Lizenzfreigabe kontaktiert. Die sollte in den nächsten Tagen ausgestellt werden, da ich die Freigabe für das Bild vorab von ihr für diese Verwendung erhalten habe. Pacsolis (talk) 07:07, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: has a VRT permission now. --Rosenzweig τ 14:22, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Architect is Max Dudler, how is still alive. Up today we don't have a permission from Max Dudler. Freedom of panorama does not apply to interior shots in Germany. See also previous discussions.

Lukas Beck (talk) 20:08, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. The proposal to accept photos inside train stations in Germany has not been accepted, per https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Village_pump/Proposals/Archive/2023/06#Allow_photos_taken_inside_of_train_stations_or_tunnels_in_Germany . It was finalized after this DR was started. So regrettably, these photos have to be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 20:53, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright protection! German freedom of panorama does not apply for interior shots. The architect is Max Dudler, who is still alive.

Lukas Beck (talk) 10:31, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, per IronGargoyle. --Ellywa (talk) 17:05, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, I revised my desicion, per this discussion on my talk page. , the ceiling it is not simple blue, it is a starry sky based on creative design. Ping User:IronGargoyle for courtesy. -- Ellywa (talk) 07:42, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo's of this starry ceiling are uploaded again and again. This is not allowed, the design is still copyrighted, and there is no FOP in Germany. Photos inside train stations in Germany have in addition not been accepted, per https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Village_pump/Proposals/Archive/2023/06#Allow_photos_taken_inside_of_train_stations_or_tunnels_in_Germany . Therefore these images should be deleted imho.

Ellywa (talk) 07:47, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"there is no FOP in Germany". Wrong. 100% wrong. Marcus Cyron (talk) 19:01, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No FOP for building interiors!!! Lukas Beck (talk) 03:56, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not what you wrote! Be clear in what you write! We talk about difficoult problems here, so there's no space for unclearness. Marcus Cyron (talk) 15:10, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Marcus Cyron it seems clear in the law itself that German FoP does not apply to all interior architectures. From the law itself (in English translation): "(1) It is permitted to reproduce, distribute and make available to the public works located permanently on public paths, roads or open spaces. In the case of buildings, this authorisation only extends to the façade." Only building exteriors can be freely photographed and shared commercially on the Internet stock archives like Commons, Flickr, Unsplash etc. with legality from German law. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:19, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Are you not willing to understand? "there is no FOP in Germany" was written. This is definetly wrong. Untrue. And again, also for you: We talk about difficoult problems here, so there's no space for unclearness! Marcus Cyron (talk) 07:34, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
But the wording makes buildings the exception, not the rule? Like: the rule is you can photograph everything that is in public space. The only thing that you can not photograph despite it being a permanent public space are interiors of buildings. But anything other than buildings can be photographed even if it's the interiors of that "something". Are train (or metro) stations/platforms "buildings"? They don't have a façade — does that mean that they are not buildings? They are also permanently publicly accessible and they serve (at least occasionally) as underpasses (or overpasses) and thus are "paths"? So, do they fall under the "rule" or do they fall under the "exception" that specifically only applies to "buildings"? I would call a metro station a "building". It's rather a "tunnel". And in Germany, metro stations usually aren't accessed through a building-like structure either. There are just stairs on the street that lead downstairs like to an underpass. The stations also often have an exit on both sides — just like "tunnels". The stations are also just platforms within a metro tunnel. It's like an underground road for a metro, where the station is not a "building" of its own but just a "pit stop" / parking space for metros. It's just a niche within a tunnel. And tunnel interiors would fall under FoP I'd think because they are basically just roads with a ceiling; they are not buildings. Nakonana (talk) 12:20, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
According to the building regulations (Musterbauordung) train stations are buildings through the permission process is different to other buildings. In the fee schedule (HOAI) they are not in the building category as they have their own category. But they are not public places like streets as they are owned by a public company and not directly by a public authority and they are not declared as public streets. GPSLeo (talk) 14:53, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep. The reversal above is clearly wrong. Sometimes we adhere too much to consistent decisions even when the past decisions were clearly wrong. Just having pinpoint lights in a ceiling is not sufficiently creative. Note that there is nothing artistic about their placement. It is a simple repeating pattern. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:47, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete -- I don't think it has to be a complex painting or the like. Sometimes it's also a simple but creative idea what counts, and in case of a "starry sky"-like ceiling of an underground station it's definitely a creative idea. And yes, according to German law interior shots, including public interiors, are not FoP-covered. @Marcus Cyron: does Wikimedia Deutschland do any effort to get German FoP laws amended in more liberal direction for us? --A.Savin 08:36, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I think there are definitely efforts in the background. There was also the idea that we need to bring this question to the court in some way but in the past there was not a singe known case where the architect of a train or underground station tried to enforce the copyright on the building. GPSLeo (talk) 09:53, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    How should I know? I don't have any ties to this club anymore. Marcus Cyron (talk) 15:10, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I understand. --A.Savin 18:51, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I doubt this is over COM:TOO Germany. Is it more complex than this? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:04, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    There I see only a {{PD-textlogo}}. Yes definitely, architectural design is more complex anyway. --A.Savin 20:34, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @A.Savin perhaps Rosenzweig is still a member of Wikimedia Deutschland? I have to admit, while Germany is the birthplace of FoP and an antithesis of France which is against commercial FoP, the FoP law does seem outdated and only applicable to the era before the prevalence of information technology and digital media. In particular, German courts tend to not give FoP rights to photographers who use drones or helicopters to photograph works from air. The German FoP, by its essence, is almost the same as its incarnation during much of the 20th century (and was originally giving rights to painters who reproduce buildings and sculptures in their paintings and then to sell those paintings without permissions from architects or sculptors). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:23, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, I'm not a Wikimedia member. --Rosenzweig τ 08:59, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I also wouldn't say that the ceiling is star-like. Those just round LED lamps in a blue-painted ceiling. They don't have a star-shape (in the way that stars are often represented in art 🌟 ). It's also not a starry sky because you can't see stars when the sky is blue; you can only see them at night when the star is nearly black; and stars have "random" placement, they don't come in lines and rows like here. Would you still say that it is a starry sky or a creative ceiling if the ceiling was painted light blue (like during day time) or even red/orange to represent sunset? Nakonana (talk) 12:30, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep A blue ceiling with small white dots in pretty much the most square/generic pattern possible, and as such far below the TOO. Weather the (obvious) intent is to depict a night sky or anything else is irrelevant, what matters is the work itself and that is too simple. If the copyright paranoia vigilance is too stong, we can also crop out the sky. ~TheImaCow (talk) 17:16, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Cropping the ceiling won't help at all. It is the design as a whole which matters in term of possible copyright. Including: the ceiling, the lighting, the walls, the columns... etc.pp. --A.Savin 21:19, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Per COM:UA, Germany has a higher threshold of originality for applied art, and this remains a VERY simple design. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:58, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Gnom: would this be below the ToO? Abzeronow (talk) 21:15, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Abzeronow: I think we would have a hard time arguing that the design of the Museumsinsel station is below the threshold of originality under German copyright law, which is why photos of it have been regularly deleted for quite some time.
    While I am here, I should note that the statement quoted by @IronGargoyle is incorrect, Germany abandoned the special threshold of originality for applied art in 2013 (which did not include architecture in the first place). If you want to know more about this, you can read my PhD thesis which discusses this exact legal question... XD Gnom (talk) 19:34, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and discussion, previous DRs were correct and the starry ceiling is copyrightable. --Abzeronow (talk) 21:51, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For the same reason as all other deletion requests before. There is no FoP for interior views in Germany.

Lukas Beck (talk) 15:31, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Das verstehe ich nicht. Author von diesen Design braucht Geld um solche Fotos zu posten? Ich dachte es ist Ehre und Reklame für ihm.
Also, es gilt für alle U-Bahn Stationen in Deutschland? Penguin9 (talk) 23:52, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In Deutschland haben wir diese Einschränkung betreffend Innenaufnahmen und, wie auch anderswo, wenn seit dem Tod des Autors (hier: des Architekten) noch keine 70 Jahre vergangen sind. Bedeutet: beispielsweise dieses U-Bahn-Foto ist für Commons unbedenklich, da es eine Außenaufnahme ist und für solche hierzulande in jedem Fall Panoramafreiheit gilt. Und bei Fotos von U-Bahnstationen, die von Alfred Grenander (gestorben 1931) entworfen sind, sind sowohl Außen- als auch Innenaufnahmen unbedenklich. --A.Savin 00:27, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination and previous DRs. --Abzeronow (talk) 21:52, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]