Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/05/31
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
Author is an admin. 186.173.19.66 03:50, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Google Lens finds one or more versions of this prior to upload here. The nominator has provided a non-reason for deletion. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 07:38, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio per Timtrent. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 10:27, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Wrong license. This is not even 50 years old. But if this is a picture from Poland, Polish law applies. Yann (talk) 08:23, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: {{PD-Poland}}. --Yann (talk) 15:10, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
https://ms.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sekolah_Menengah_Kebangsaan_Proton_City need immediate deletion. this image is out of scope. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 17:03, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 18:40, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
No FOP for artwork in the United States. —howcheng {chat} 07:48, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:02, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 09:10, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedily deleted as G4 (recreation of previously deleted content). —holly {chat} 21:06, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Nominated for deletion: I did not release it in public domain. It was an accident because I've been a Wikipedian for 4 days. Also, this audio sample is for "I'm Not A Juvenile Delinquent" article purposes. Thanks! Inajd0101 (talk) 16:47, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 22:19, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
I don't know why this image did not load properly when I uploaded it. LostplanetKD73 (talk) 01:37, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Nevermind it looks like the upload finally went through. LostplanetKD73 (talk) 01:38, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: nomination was withdrawn. --Rosenzweig τ 11:05, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
vie privée Aimeabibis (talk) 08:40, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 10:56, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
vie privée Aimeabibis (talk) 08:41, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: privacy issue, uploader request, not in use. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 11:06, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
vie privée Aimeabibis (talk) 08:43, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: privacy issue, uploader request, not in use. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 11:05, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
vie privée Aimeabibis (talk) 08:43, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: privacy issue, uploader request, not in use. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 11:04, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
vie privée, username affiché Aimeabibis (talk) 08:44, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: privacy issue, uploader request, not in use. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 11:04, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Image floue Aimeabibis (talk) 08:45, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: privacy issue, uploader request, not in use. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 11:04, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Image floue Aimeabibis (talk) 08:46, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: privacy issue, uploader request, not in use. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 11:04, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Image floue Aimeabibis (talk) 08:46, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: privacy issue, uploader request, not in use. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 11:04, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Image floue Aimeabibis (talk) 08:47, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: privacy issue, uploader request, not in use. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 11:04, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Image floue Aimeabibis (talk) 08:49, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: privacy issue, uploader request. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 11:03, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Image floue Aimeabibis (talk) 08:50, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: privacy issue. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 11:03, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Publication sur fr.wikipedia.org (licence) et doublon donc de Commons Tirdag (talk) 09:20, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 11:04, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Al*from*Lig (talk) 09:31, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 11:03, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
per errore Nicol Surace (talk) 13:07, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 11:02, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
per errore Nicol Surace (talk) 13:08, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 11:02, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
doublon à la demande du téléverseur Finoskov (talk) 16:54, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:59, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
The main subject of the image is copyrighted material. All the best -- Chuck Talk 20:24, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- I am not sure if you mean the billboard itself, the person on the billboard, or the design of the billboard. As a representative of the PdH, owner of the original design, I am allowed to publish this image on Wikipedia. Mcaraggiu (talk) 20:32, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- In that case, please send an email to VRT with proof of your ability to release the image under a free license. All the best -- Chuck Talk 20:37, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: has a VRT permission now. --Rosenzweig τ 10:56, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Image floue Aimeabibis (talk) 22:15, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Certainly not fuzzy (floue) enough to delete on that basis. There might be a reason to delete this uncategorized, barely described image, but that isn't it. - Jmabel ! talk 04:59, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Jmabel, the uploader asked me privately to remove the image because of an issue with privacy. Thanks! — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 11:02, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: privacy issue. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 11:02, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
KANEM BORNO Adkerimi (talk) 16:01, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
(non-admin closure) Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:37, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Com:Penis screenshot 186.173.108.61 14:34, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, G7-speedied. --Túrelio (talk) 09:15, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 08:46, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:46, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
One More unused unnecessary dick 186.173.108.61 14:35, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, G7-speedied. --Túrelio (talk) 09:15, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bakare Jamiu456 (talk · contribs)
editUploaded by sockpuppet.
All the best -- Chuck Talk 15:45, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Content created as advertisement (G10). --Эlcobbola talk 13:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Out of the project scope (non-notable), also potential copyvio? Screenshot in metadata, same image appears at https://open.spotify.com/intl-fr/artist/0f8WYaBH8lcVNvEUIR4IMa Nutshinou Talk! 16:36, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:22, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Not educationally useful 💚Kelly The Angel (Talk to me)💚 03:42, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete F10 garbage Dronebogus (talk) 15:13, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: attack image. --Wutsje 04:44, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Not educationally useful 💚Kelly The Angel (Talk to me)💚 03:43, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, possibly cyber bullying too. --Wutsje 04:41, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope seemingly random image The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:10, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:13, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
I can find no evidence that Democratic People's Republic of Tedlandia exists outside the uploader's head. Out of scope. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:39, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:14, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Appears to be personal art? Out of scope. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:41, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:14, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:22, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:14, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 09:05, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:14, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in New Zealand A1Cafel (talk) 09:05, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:14, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in New Zealand A1Cafel (talk) 09:07, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:14, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 09:07, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 04:47, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in New Zealand A1Cafel (talk) 09:09, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:14, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in New Zealand A1Cafel (talk) 09:10, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:14, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 09:11, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:14, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in New Zealand A1Cafel (talk) 09:11, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:14, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 09:13, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:14, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 09:13, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:15, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in New Zealand A1Cafel (talk) 09:14, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:15, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in New Zealand A1Cafel (talk) 09:15, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:15, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Although the person illustrated here is clearly from "public domain" era (en:Narayana Guru died 1928), this is one of many nearly identical images all over the web that are of indeterminant provenance. I cannot find information about the original or this specific variant, so we can't confirm that this specific image is of that era vs a later new DW creation that has still-active license protection. DMacks (talk) 09:38, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:15, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
This is a photo of the 1970 painting Pharoah Sanders et Sonny Sharrock by French painter en:Bernard Rancillac, inside a museum in Belgium. Rancillac died in 2021, so this painting is still copyrighted until the end of 2091. There is no freedom of panorama inside museums in Belgium. So the file should be deleted. It can be restored in 2092. Rosenzweig τ 11:36, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:15, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope --Alaa :)..! 11:46, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:15, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope --Alaa :)..! 11:46, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:15, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
This file shows the 1967 painting Dialogue by German artist de:Peter Klasen (born in 1935 and apparently alive) inside a museum in Belgium. The painting is still copyrighted, and there is no freedom of panorama in museums in Belgium, so the file should be deleted. It can be restored 70 years pma. Rosenzweig τ 12:06, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:15, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Missing info who is the author of the photo, source. Missing license/permission for the photo. Wdwd (talk) 14:30, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:16, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Missing license/permission for original photograph. Unknown author. Wdwd (talk) 14:35, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:16, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope and personal photo of user राजकुमार(talk) 16:32, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 04:47, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused personal image that is out of scope for Commons. Also watermarked. Nv8200p (talk) 18:05, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:16, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: @Krd: Hello, Good morning. I restored this one, as it's the only image we seem to have of the 1858 Earle-Harrison House, a Recorded Texas Historic Landmark, and therefore of obvious educational value. Renamed and properly categorized, also in use, now.-- Darwin Ahoy! 09:33, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Used in hoax on the English wikipedia. See en:Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Orison TV Whpq (talk) 19:05, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:16, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Erikacorralesg (talk · contribs)
editF10 and G10. photos meant for advertising and personal photos of/by non contributors.
- File:Erika Corrales y Anna Paula Rodrigues.jpg
- File:Erika Corrales Profesora.jpg
- File:Erika Corrales.jpg
- File:Información Erika Corrales.jpg
- File:Mis hijos.jpg
All the best -- Chuck Talk 20:19, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 04:47, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
no quality Xocolatl (talk) 00:48, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:21, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by राजेशतकयार (talk · contribs)
editOut of scope: unused AI-generated fantasy art (description "photo of God from AI", etc).
Omphalographer (talk) 01:12, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:03, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Appears to be a fictional coat of arms - File:Coat of arms of Palestine.svg is what's used on projects The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:06, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:04, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Random collection of unused AI images. Out of scope.
- File:Science fiction comedy.jpg
- File:History of emotions.jpg
- File:Free association (psychology).jpg
- File:Censorship (psychoanalysis).jpg
- File:Unconscious wishes.jpg
- File:Cuckquean.jpg
- File:Father complex.jpg
- File:Laius complex.jpg
- File:Associationism.jpg
- File:Jocasta complex.jpg
- File:Childhood trauma.jpg
- File:Open marriage.jpg
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:14, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hello! I used to do it to illustrate some articles. But someone threw them away. It's sad that articles about abstract concepts are not illustrated. Krutyvuss (talk) 06:20, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:04, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by M4tinbeigi (talk · contribs)
editThis appears to be undeclared AI, and is incredibly low quality, so is out of scope as unusable
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:21, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:05, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by M4tinbeigi (talk · contribs)
editLogos for, as far as I can tell, a non-notable TV show? Unused and likely out of scope.
- File:Rokhdad-logo-solo11.png
- File:Poweredby rokhdad 176x62.png
- File:Poweredby rokhdad 132x47.png
- File:Poweredby rokhdad 88x31.png
- File:Rokhdad-typography-persian.png
- File:Rokhdad-typography-englishsvg.png
- File:Rokhdad-logo-white.png
- File:Rokhdad-logo-solo.png
- File:Rokhdad-logo-black.png
- File:Rokhdad-logo-colorfulsvg.png
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:23, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:05, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Low quality AI images of a building technique for which freely licensed images are available
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:28, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:05, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Diliancami (talk · contribs)
editCollection of unused AI 'stock art', out of COM:SCOPE
- File:Pedrito.jpg
- File:Fondofonfo.jpg
- File:Botellitas.jpg
- File:Fondobotellasplasticas.jpg
- File:Mundobotella.jpg
- File:Manosambientalcosmos.jpg
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:29, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:05, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Izanonrubia (talk · contribs)
editDubious own work claim. These all appear to come from https://www.pspvpsoe.es/es/diputacion-de-castellon/ etc. but the Commons images are larger than the ones I can find on the suspected source website.
- File:FERRER PONS foto.jpg
- File:FAJARDO FRANCH foto.jpg
- File:GUARDIOLA CLARAMONTE foto.jpg
- File:SANZ MONROIG foto.jpg
- File:ESCRICHE RIVAS foto.jpg
- File:MORENO SEGOVIA foto.jpg
- File:APARISI JUAN foto.jpg
- File:RIPOLLÉS PUIG foto.jpg
- File:FALOMIR SANCHO foto.jpg
- File:GALÍ ALFONSO foto.jpg
- File:LÓPEZ IBÁÑEZ foto.jpg
- File:JIMÉNEZ ROMÁN foto.jpg
- File:BENLLOCH FERNÁNDEZ foto.jpg
- File:FORNÁS TUZÓN foto.jpg
- File:SÁNCHEZ CIFRE foto.jpg
- File:MARTÍNEZ CASTELLÁ foto.jpg
- File:PALLARÉS CIFRE foto.jpg
- File:LLOPIS CASALS foto.jpg
- File:CLAUSELL EDO foto.jpg
- File:ANDRÉS ALÓS foto.jpg
- File:FOLGADO MIRAVET foto.jpg
- File:TORMO CASAÑ foto.jpg
- File:VICENTE SEGARRA foto.jpg
- File:TORLÁ BARRACHINA foto.jpg
- File:PALLARÉS RENAU foto.jpg
- File:TOLEDO LLORENS foto.jpg
- File:BARRACHINA MATEU foto.jpg
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:36, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:06, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Low quality AI image (nonsense text, fork-spoon, etc.). Unused and unlikely to be used. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:24, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete,please.This photo was uploaded by me without a clear understanding of the rules, sorry! User:Winzekter986 (talk) 12:45, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:07, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
This is essentially the same logo as File:WEAU 13 logo.png on the English Wikipedia, except omitting the NBC peacock. The other/earlier version is asserted to be non-free; are there any other factors here that would send this overall logo above TOO? (It is not CC0-licensed in any event.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:27, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per COM:TOO. Every part of the logo is either a simple geometric shape (ovals / rectangles) or letters. Royalbroil 17:00, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Bedivere (talk) 04:32, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
no textlogo Krd 06:17, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:07, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Undeleted: as per [1]. Yann (talk) 13:56, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Distracting backgroun that obscures some ofthe bonding, and large jpg artifacts. File:Dibenzofurà polisustituit3D.png is better. DMacks (talk) 06:40, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Delete, low quality with distracting background. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 18:41, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:07, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted VectorStock images A1Cafel (talk) 07:26, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:07, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Super Sonico
editThis Anime and cover is copyright from nitro
メイド理世 (talk) 07:51, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:08, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Non free photo of a living person Leokand (talk) 09:18, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:08, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
private photo / out of scope LevandeMänniska (talk), 09:49, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:09, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio, artist died in 1982 M2k~dewiki (talk) 09:56, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:09, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio, artist died in 1982 M2k~dewiki (talk) 09:56, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:09, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation. FC logo is copyrighted. Masti (talk) 10:58, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:09, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Uploader claims to be the copyright holder of this, and is unlikely to be the current rights holder, Atari. Andrzejbanas (talk) 12:17, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:10, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Uploader claims to be the copyright holder of this, and is unlikely to be the current rights holder, Atari. Andrzejbanas (talk) 12:17, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:10, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Uploader claims to be the copyright holder of this, and is unlikely to be the current rights holder, Atari. Andrzejbanas (talk) 12:20, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:10, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Uploader claims to be the copyright holder of this, and is unlikely to be the current rights holder, Atari. Andrzejbanas (talk) 12:44, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:10, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 13:13, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:10, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 13:13, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:11, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 13:13, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:11, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 13:14, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:11, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 13:15, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:11, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
PDF error while creating index on Wikisource
editThese files can't be indexed on Wikisource. It looks like they'll need to be reuploaded in DjVu format. --Akbar Soepadhi (talk) 13:11, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:11, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
uploaded for test purposes Reputation22 (talk) 13:20, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:12, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Duplicated due to my mistake Admantine123 (talk) 13:24, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:12, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Uploader claims to be the copyright holder of this, and is unlikely to be the current rights holder, Atari. Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:24, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:12, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Uploader claims to be the copyright holder of this, and is unlikely to be the current rights holder, Atari. Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:25, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:13, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Uploader claims to be the copyright holder of this, and is unlikely to be the current rights holder, Atari. Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:25, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:13, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
No obvious educational value - Commons is not an imagebin for your personal marketing artwork; see Commons:Project scope 89.103.185.200 13:43, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:13, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Man born in 1932, he is 92 now. Can not be original own work of 2024. Original date? Author? Copyright status? Drakosh (talk) 14:08, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Are you a mathematician? Delete. 186.173.108.61 14:51, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:13, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation 2A01:CB08:8EB:7100:E1E6:18B5:1AA4:1684 14:59, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:14, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation, it taken from the copyrighted newspapers Mickey Đại Phát (talk) 15:27, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:15, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Low resolution image missing full EXIF data, dubious claim of own work CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:08, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:15, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio (c) Anna Lewandowski M2k~dewiki (talk) 16:26, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:14, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope राजकुमार(talk) 16:33, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:14, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope राजकुमार(talk) 16:34, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:15, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Out of the project scope (non-notable), but also the copyright holder is Curtis Perry per metadata Nutshinou Talk! 16:36, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:15, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
nonsense Xocolatl (talk) 17:24, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by Krd. --Kadı Message 08:16, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
https://listentodiscover.com/2021/04/23/behind-the-music-interview-with-dance-lessons/ Xocolatl (talk) 17:35, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:16, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Severalsevens (talk · contribs)
editout of project scope, not notable.
modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 17:47, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Severalsevens/sandbox modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 17:50, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Not even an own work as claimed. 186.172.6.153 22:24, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:17, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 18:46, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:18, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
It was uploaded accidentally, it is the same as another file but then scribbled on Nelsnelson (talk) 19:56, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:18, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:35, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:19, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Sosthenes, Apollo, Cephas, Tychicus, Epaphroditus, Cæsar and Onesiphorus of 70 disciples (Menologion of Basil II).jpg
editit's not a public domain image if it originates from the vatican library, it also has a watermark on it Jeanamite (talk) 22:51, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Jeanamite: I don't follow your logic at all. How would an obviously ancient image not be public domain, simply because the Vatican Library reproduced it and added a watermark? - Jmabel ! talk 05:02, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, public domain.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:13, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep 11th century 2-dimensional artwork. --Achim55 (talk) 08:33, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep as above --Ras67 (talk) 21:36, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 08:19, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded for site; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:04, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 08:19, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Converted to DR from {{No permission since}} deletion tag. Was tagged by User:Belbury, but I don’t know that permission is required in this instance given the image is {{PD-AI}}. 148.252.146.124 15:00, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: this is a public domain image correctly tagged with {{PD-AI}}. PK-WIKI (talk) 17:18, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:PRP. We don't know the creator of the image, what country they were working in (some countries consider AI-generated work to be copyrighted to the prompter; for example, Commons does not host any of the AI art from Willy's Chocolate Experience despite it being posted to social media) or how much of the image was AI-generated. A Washington Post article merely has an analyst being "confident" that it was "generated with the help of AI". Belbury (talk) 19:54, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, we know who is the creator. According to en:All Eyes on Rafah and [2], Amirul Shah is the author. Yann (talk) 20:47, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- How confident are we that they created it rather than sharing it from elsewhere? enwiki says
originally posted
rather than created, and The Washington Post more cautiously describes Shah asthe first person to use the image in an Instagram story template
rather than naming them as the artist, adding that they couldn't be reached for comment. If we do know that Shah created it, do we know what country they're based in, and whether they modified the image before posting it? Belbury (talk) 21:01, 31 May 2024 (UTC)- I don't see any reason to doubt The Washington Post. And yes, we know he is from Malaysia or Singapore. What you say looks like en:WP:OR to me. Yann (talk) 21:11, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not doubting the Washington Post either, their reporting of it seems like the most rigorous: they say that Shah was
the first person to use the image
on Instagram rather than claiming them to be its creator, and the strongest commitment that their expert wants to give on the AI nature of the image is that it was madewith the help of
AI. - If it turns out that Shah copied it from a Facebook post of a friend in Hong Kong, or that they had to fix some misgenerated text in the image manually, then it's not a globally public domain artwork. If Commons only considers it very likely that an image is in the public domain, that isn't enough for us to publish it as PD. Belbury (talk) 08:35, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not doubting the Washington Post either, their reporting of it seems like the most rigorous: they say that Shah was
- I don't see any reason to doubt The Washington Post. And yes, we know he is from Malaysia or Singapore. What you say looks like en:WP:OR to me. Yann (talk) 21:11, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- How confident are we that they created it rather than sharing it from elsewhere? enwiki says
- Yes, we know who is the creator. According to en:All Eyes on Rafah and [2], Amirul Shah is the author. Yann (talk) 20:47, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete The means of creation remain unclear. Created by AI or by content creator? If anybody wants to commemorate an exploding Hamas ammo dump again - make sure to document your process next time. Alexpl (talk) 21:44, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. While it certainly appears likely that this image was generated using AI tools, it isn't unambiguous enough that we can unilaterally declare the image to be in the public domain. Omphalographer (talk) 22:31, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- There are plenty of reliable sources reporting that it is an AI-generated image, without any couching that it's only likely AI-generated.
- Al Jazeera: "All eyes on Rafah" is an artificial intelligence (AI) generated image with a slogan calling attention to the situation in Rafah, the southernmost city in the Gaza Strip near the border with Egypt. ... Al Jazeera’s Sanad fact-checking agency confirmed that the image was generated using an artificial intelligence (AI) tool.
- Salon: Soon after, an AI-generated photo of a field of refugee tents with the slogan “All Eyes on Rafah" sprawled across the center of the image began to pop up online. [...] The one post that seems to have broken through to the masses just happened to be the now-viral AI image.
- BBC: An AI-generated image depicting tent camps for displaced Palestinians and a slogan that reads All Eyes on Rafah is sweeping social media.
- PK-WIKI (talk) 22:46, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- There are plenty of reliable sources reporting that it is an AI-generated image, without any couching that it's only likely AI-generated.
- Speedy keep this was clearly made by an AI and is clearly COM:INUSE. Also, User:Alexpl, stop being racist. The reason we don’t host WCE images is because they’re copyrighted in the country of origin. Dronebogus (talk) 05:39, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- I am too lazy to get you punished for your baseless accusation. The history of the image remains a sloppy word-of-mouth saga. Alexpl (talk) 09:53, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Whatever that’s supposed to mean Dronebogus (talk) 10:10, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- I am too lazy to get you punished for your baseless accusation. The history of the image remains a sloppy word-of-mouth saga. Alexpl (talk) 09:53, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep According to the news media reports mentioned by PK-WIKI, this image was generated by AI, and there is no room for us to doubt them. It might have a chance of turning out to be so, as Belbury says, but that is just assumption at this point. It is sensible for us to delete this image when it turns out, not for the present. --TKsdik8900 (talk) 14:13, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- There is ample room for us to question whether or not the creator of the image is based in a country that has copyright protection for AI-generated works.
- Some sources are cautious about whether Amirul Shah was the original creator of the image or just the first person to share it as an Instagram story (
The first Instagram story using it was posted on Monday by user @shahv4012. Al Jazeera could not confirm whether this user created the image.
...Instagram credits a user named “shahv4012” as the first person to use the image in an Instagram story template. The user did not immediately respond to requests for comment from The Washington Post.
) and Commons should share that caution. - The idea that we could host it for a few weeks or years and delete it if it later turned out to be copyright-protected after all is an inappropriate "we can get away with it" line of COM:PRP. The image can still be hosted on enwiki if it's needed to illustrate an article there. Belbury (talk) 15:02, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: reliable sources say this was AI generated, anything beyond that is speculation. NAADAAN (talk) 14:25, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Info New articles at 404 Media and NPR on this AI image's authorship. Introduces a new potential creator, Malaysian Zila Abka, February 14 original post to Facebook using Microsoft’s AI tool Image Creator. PK-WIKI (talk) 23:58, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- So the NPR source quotes Abka as creating a smaller, squarer, definitely AI image and saying the version that went viral and which Commons is hosting is a modification of that.
Her watermarks were gone. And the image was expanded to include snow-capped mountains looming over the tents, an almost surrealist touch, an AI riff on Gaza’s Middle Eastern landscape.
- The original claimed creator, Amirul Shah, has also been reached for a quote there and denies this, claiming to have created the image himself using AI.
He thinks he used Microsoft’s Image Creator, the same service Abka used, but he claims he can’t remember.
- If we take the view that Abka created it for Facebook and Shah shared a modified version to Instagram, there's still room for further intermediate steps if someone else added the mountains along the way. Definitely much less clear cut than some of the early news reporting of "AI image generated by Amiral Shah". Belbury (talk) 10:35, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Both potential creators are Malaysian and created their work in Malaysia. Both used AI tools; nothing in the reliable sources says anything about non-AI artistry.
- {{PD-AI}} still applies to the work of either and both creators.
- The only possible non-AI editing that has been reported is "AbKa put two watermarks on it: One indicating it was generated by AI; another saying she was the creator." and then "Her watermarks were gone.", but it's unclear if either adding or removing a watermark would be enough to convey copyright protection to the adder/eraser. The file currently hosted on commons contains no watermarks.
- That "there's still room for further intermediate steps if someone else added the mountains along the way" is completely conjecture not supported by any of the reliable sources.
- PK-WIKI (talk) 20:51, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- That Shah personally removed the watermark on Abka's original image and expanded it using AI is complete conjecture on Abka's behalf. Shah is denying having done this. Belbury (talk) 07:55, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- So the NPR source quotes Abka as creating a smaller, squarer, definitely AI image and saying the version that went viral and which Commons is hosting is a modification of that.
- Delete It's kind of pointless to keep the image if we can't even figure out where it came from originally. It seems like that's always been the case though. As reading through news stories about the image at least a week ago and no one ever said they were sure where it was posted first or who's account it originally came from. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:23, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Zila Abka is quite certainly the first author who posted a version of this image.
- Zila Abka is Malaysian and did so from Malaysia.
- In the absence of case laws in Malaysia, we might assume they will likely follow England and Wales and rule that prompters can claim copyright to AI images. Butcher2021 (talk) 11:35, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Zila Abka is quite certainly the first author who posted a version of this image.
What exactly are you basing that on? --Adamant1 (talk) 12:42, 4 June 2024 (UTC)- Why would we assume their case law would follow England and Wales? {{PD-algorithm}} mentions protections in the UK and Hong Kong, but Commons seems to treat AI from images all other countries as Public Domain. PK-WIKI (talk) 17:18, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- I believe Butcher2021 is misinterpreting inherited laws. A lot of countries, when they broke free from colonialism, inherited the laws of their colonizer and then edited them from there. That's relevant when we're trying to figure out what to do about images that were taken in a country while it was a colony, and it means a lot of countries have at least parts of whatever laws Britain and France had during the colonial era still on the books, but it isn't relevant here. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:04, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Butcher2021: The copyright protection for AI images in the UK is based on a new law that, as Lord Young of Graffham remarked at the time it was enacted, is "the first copyright legislation anywhere in the world which attempts to deal specifically with the advent of artificial intelligence". This protection is not based on court interpretation of traditional copyright laws and thus there is no reason to think that Malaysia would "follow England and Wales" as Malaysia has no such law. Nosferattus (talk) 04:40, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- I believe Butcher2021 is misinterpreting inherited laws. A lot of countries, when they broke free from colonialism, inherited the laws of their colonizer and then edited them from there. That's relevant when we're trying to figure out what to do about images that were taken in a country while it was a colony, and it means a lot of countries have at least parts of whatever laws Britain and France had during the colonial era still on the books, but it isn't relevant here. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:04, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep The image was AI-generated by two people in Malaysia, thus it is public domain in both the US and the source country. Malaysia has no known copyright protection for AI-generated media. Nosferattus (talk) 04:47, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. There are multiple sources saying that it is AI-generated by two people in Malaysia, and Malaysia law doesn't consider it a copyrighted work. Also in the public domain in USA. --Yann (talk) 17:58, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Unable Strike 6117 (talk · contribs)
editper COM:PORN
but... after checking out , i really dont sure these are in scope or not. maybe we should keep? i dont know.
- File:25 year old man with removed pubic hair.jpg
- File:Young 24 years old man with pubic hair.jpg
- File:Young 24 year old man with removed pubuc hair.jpg
- File:Young man with pubic hair.jpg
- File:Nude young man with removed pubic hair.jpg
modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 17:53, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep them at your home. DELETE ALL por Com:Nudity. 186.172.6.153 22:22, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:06, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Non free picture. It's a cropped version of a WWE copyrighted picture https://www.wrestling-world.com/news/news/wwe/26830/brie-and-nikki-garcia-s-future-in-wrestling/ HHH Pedrigree (talk) 18:15, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:08, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Unclear if this image is actually below the COM:TOO Adeletron 3030 (talk) 18:25, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:09, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Because it is Logo Tytoalba (talk) 20:57, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment there might well be reasons to delete this file, but it clearly does not contain a copyrightable logo. - Jmabel ! talk 04:52, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Advert/promotional, out of scope. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:13, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Com:Penis, another exhibitionist photo 186.172.6.153 22:18, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep High quality. --RAN (talk) 00:42, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- What, the dick? 186.172.6.153 01:39, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- I wish I could un-see it, but it is a technically high-quality photo, so Keep. - Jmabel ! talk 04:57, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- What, the dick? 186.172.6.153 01:39, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete clear copyright violation. Less cropped-in version can be found here: https://adultimgshare.co.uk/viewimage?img=136757 (although the image uploaded specifically comes from [3]). 3 of the uploader's 4 other uploads were also suspected to be copyvios (1, 2, 3) -- Nutshinou Talk! 16:49, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --IronGargoyle (talk) 17:17, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Erkennen meiner Person der letzten Datei 2A01:C23:B953:DF00:84FC:5A02:C064:BC6A 13:16, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Nicht korrekte Korrektur. 2A01:C23:B953:DF00:84FC:5A02:C064:BC6A 13:23, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Unverständliche Löschanträge. Behalten. Magnus (talk) 14:01, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- hallo Magnus,
- ich erbitte diesen Eintrag da er nicht unter meine Zustimmung aufgenommen wurde und leider noch etwas von mir klar zu sehen bin. Da die Datei mit der Davor zu ergänzen ist fordere ich bitte dies.
- Mit freundichen Grüßen 2A01:C23:B953:DF00:1531:4DC7:EDC6:6DED 15:31, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- {{ subst : delete2 |image=File:Nürnberg, Johannisstraße 13 20170821 002-2.jpg|reason=Erkennen meiner Person der letzten Datei}} 2A01:C23:B953:DF00:1531:4DC7:EDC6:6DED 15:57, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- warum wollen Sie zwei Bilder der Datei behalten, auf denen ich klar zu erkennen bin.
- MfG Waschroom (talk) 16:50, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Info The file is used. Also, I see no person on the image. Ankry (talk) 18:18, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hallo, ja auf vielen Desktop PC s ist leider das der Fal. Leider existieren zwei Exemplare und wir wurden nicht richtig ausgeschnitten. Da des Bild existiere wünsche ich mir das Bild zu löschen was am 10.05.2024 mit nur 2% bearbeitet ist zu löschen.
- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Waschroom (talk) 16:42, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Requester asks for revision deletion because there are a few pixels of his visible at the left. Looks like paranoia. --Achim55 (talk) 21:25, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Ich bitte die korrekte Löschung und keine dummen Sprüche Ihrerseits. Waschroom (talk) 16:45, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: No personality rights are violated here as no person can be recognized on that photo. The original uncropped version where hands (but not the face) could be seen at the left has already been revision-deleted by Achim55.
Behalten: Mit diesem Photo werden keine Persönlichkeitsrechte verletzt. Die ursprünglich zu sehenden Hände sind weggeschnitten worden, die ursprüngliche Fassung wurde bereits von Achim55 gelöscht, so dass nur noch die beschnittene Variante zugänglich ist. Es gibt somit keinen Anlass, diese Datei zu löschen. --AFBorchert (talk) 09:13, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Veröffentlichung ohne Zustimmung 2A02:3100:9CF6:C200:F8AA:3F8:936E:8FD2 01:18, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, already discussed. Dmartin969 (talk) 03:35, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 07:32, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Emblems of cities in China
editIn China, official city emblems are not automatically exempt from copyright protection and {{PD-PRC-exempt}} does not apply. Also COM:TOO China is very low. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Flags of cities in China.
- File:Baotou City Logo.svg
- File:ChongqingCityLogo.svg
- File:Emblem of Changshu City.svg
- File:Emblem of Chifeng City.svg
- File:Emblem of Guilin City.svg
- File:Emblem of Qingdao City.svg
- File:Official seal of Haikou.svg
- File:Xinxiang City Logo.svg
- File:太原市市徽.png
Wcam (talk) 15:03, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 12:44, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
No EXIF. The photo is available on the player's Facebook and on Baidu with unclear credit. Confirmation via VTRS is needed. Gumruch (talk) 15:46, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 12:44, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
given the uploader's history, it is unlikely that this is their own work; dubious license EdrianJustine (talk) 19:03, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 09:03, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
This image is from a Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences article and I doubt it is CC 4.0 as claimed. The copyright policy of AMS does not seems to allow reproduction of works without written permission. Pierre cb (talk) 03:53, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, can be undeleted with proof of CC. --Gbawden (talk) 18:37, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope as plain text (ꯀꯣꯔꯧ) The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:00, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- @The Squirrel Conspiracy, the file is in use. Kadı Message 08:03, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 18:23, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope as plain text (ꯀꯣꯔꯧꯍꯟꯕ) The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:00, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- @The Squirrel Conspiracy, the file is in use. Kadı Message 08:04, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 18:23, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyvios of SPH Medical College:
- File:Internee of SPH Medical College 2013.jpg
- File:SPH Medical College.jpg
- File:Staff and Teacher of SPH Medical College.jpg
--Gpkp (talk) 04:31, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:24, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
This file is unlikely to have been created by the uploader. This is an official portrait of State Rep. Jasper Martus. Martus is a state representative in Michigan. The portrait can be seen on his official website. Works by the Michigan state government are not in the public domain, nor do they have a free license. RoundSquare (talk) 05:44, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:24, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Possibly a copyvio: Obviously a screenshot, therefore probably not “own work by Loyce Rewis”. Copyright status of both the photograph and the card/text are unknown. Mormegil (talk) 06:37, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:24, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Logo likely to be above COM:TOO A1Cafel (talk) 06:53, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:24, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Logo likely to be above COM:TOO A1Cafel (talk) 06:53, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:25, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
questionable licence Magnus (talk) 06:59, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:25, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
No indication of publication nor creation date. — Racconish 💬 07:14, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep This image comes from the Billy Rose Theatre Collection which consists of publicity images in circulation. I could see arguing that it remained out of circulation if it had a named photographer and the photographer, or their estate, deposited them in an archive. We have that situation with the Getty archive. United States copyright case law has declared that an image becomes public when it leaves the custody of the photographer. See the corresponding case law at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Minerva Kohlhepp Teichert 1908.jpg. Like every image prior to smartphones, dates are estimated by the birth and death years of the person in the image. There is also no copyright registration or copyright renewal for any image of Eleanor Audley in either database. Copyright registration was required up to 1989. --RAN (talk) 11:35, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- I find the Copyright Office analysis to be somhow more complex : "A photograph is published when copies of that photograph are offered to a group of persons for purposes of further distribution or public display. The public display of a photograph, in and of itself, does not constitute publication". [4] [5]. A broad understanding of the above is that publication occurs when there is a commercial use of the photography [6]. But even in that broader sense, we do not have enough information to make an assessment here. — Racconish 💬 15:17, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Instead of you and I interpreting the law as written, we already have case law on the ruling on that very topic, as I already pointed out: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Minerva Kohlhepp Teichert 1908.jpg. All evidence points to a three ring binder used by casting directors. This is a well worn positive print, not a negative sequestered in an archive and never printed. The negative is the original creative work, and every "perceivable copy" must comply with copyright formalities, if a copyright was ever intended. See for example: Category:Bain copyright notice. You pointed to Stark law and their insight on published versus unpublished which reads: "There are plenty of ways to "make commercial use" of a work without literally offering copies of it for sale. A one-of-a-kind painting hung in a gallery, for example, is published because it has entered into the commercial stream. If you bought ad space on Facebook and used a photograph you took, that photograph would likely be considered published, despite the fact that you are not offering to sell copies of it; you have used the photograph for commercial purposes and are relying on copyright law to protect your exclusive use of it." I would say that publicity headshots are "commercial use", we house thousands of them. --RAN (talk) 16:27, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- In the case you refer to, there was an attribution to a professional photographer which cannot be made here. Therefore I think the principle of precaution should apply. — Racconish 💬 20:11, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- You might as well argue that the other case involved a picture of a man, and this is a picture of a woman. Our precautionary principle requires that you present some sort of actionable evidence, not speculation that can be applied to every/any image. --RAN (talk) 20:59, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- In the case you refer to, there was an attribution to a professional photographer which cannot be made here. Therefore I think the principle of precaution should apply. — Racconish 💬 20:11, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Instead of you and I interpreting the law as written, we already have case law on the ruling on that very topic, as I already pointed out: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Minerva Kohlhepp Teichert 1908.jpg. All evidence points to a three ring binder used by casting directors. This is a well worn positive print, not a negative sequestered in an archive and never printed. The negative is the original creative work, and every "perceivable copy" must comply with copyright formalities, if a copyright was ever intended. See for example: Category:Bain copyright notice. You pointed to Stark law and their insight on published versus unpublished which reads: "There are plenty of ways to "make commercial use" of a work without literally offering copies of it for sale. A one-of-a-kind painting hung in a gallery, for example, is published because it has entered into the commercial stream. If you bought ad space on Facebook and used a photograph you took, that photograph would likely be considered published, despite the fact that you are not offering to sell copies of it; you have used the photograph for commercial purposes and are relying on copyright law to protect your exclusive use of it." I would say that publicity headshots are "commercial use", we house thousands of them. --RAN (talk) 16:27, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- I find the Copyright Office analysis to be somhow more complex : "A photograph is published when copies of that photograph are offered to a group of persons for purposes of further distribution or public display. The public display of a photograph, in and of itself, does not constitute publication". [4] [5]. A broad understanding of the above is that publication occurs when there is a commercial use of the photography [6]. But even in that broader sense, we do not have enough information to make an assessment here. — Racconish 💬 15:17, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep The back of the picture can be seen at [7], and there is no copyright notice. Yann (talk) 20:41, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per RAN and Yann. --Gbawden (talk) 18:25, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
کیفیت عکس پایین است Pouyayaghoubkish (talk) 07:41, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 18:26, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
We don't need a crop of File:Glaxo Smith Kline, Stockley Park - geograph.org.uk - 2659029.jpg focussing on the sculpture as we have File:Artorius.jpg, which unlike this file correctly identifies the artwork. Ham II (talk) 08:00, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:26, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Promotional and book cover is copyright Jimfbleak (talk) 08:03, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment File:Natasha_Kravchuk_Cookbook.jpg is a duplicate of the nominated file. Marbletan (talk) 17:05, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Evidence of permission from the photographer/copyright holder is needed in order for this image to be hosted on Commons. Currently, two different users are each claiming it as "own work". Marbletan (talk) 17:05, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:27, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 08:51, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:24, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 09:09, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:27, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 09:08, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:40, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 09:10, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:27, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:42, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:07, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 09:12, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:27, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by IcedEarthMinistries (talk · contribs)
editUnused images with a false declaration of "own work".
Cabayi (talk) 09:28, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:28, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio (c) Bernhard Liesegang M2k~dewiki (talk) 09:57, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:29, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
These inferior image and its use should be replaced by this far superior image here: File:Funerary mask of Sitdjehuti.jpg Leoboudv (talk) 10:36, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:31, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Peter Saul
editThese files show works of art by American artist en:Peter Saul, born in 1934 and apparently alive. With art from the US, you're never quite sure if the works (at least the older ones before 1989) are in the PD because of lack of notice/registration etc., but I'll assume works by such a well-known artist are copyrighted unless at least some evidence to the contrary is presented.Two files show works inside a museum in Belgium (but there is no freedom of panorama in Belgian museums), while two others are claimed to be "Photographs of publicly available works", whatever that is supposed to tell us. The photo portrait of the artist can most likely be saved by cropping out the painting in the background.
- File:2021-01-10 10-53-10 ILCE-6500 DSC01131 DxO (50946866403).jpg
- File:2021-01-10 10-53-24 ILCE-6500 DSC01134 DxO (50947888096).jpg
- File:Peter Saul Ahem.jpg
- File:Peter Saul Ever Redy.jpg
- File:Peter Saul.jpg
Rosenzweig τ 11:50, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:32, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Likely copyrighted art. The source link provided states, "© Fanatics, Inc., 2024. All Rights Reserved. No portion of this site may be reproduced or duplicated without the express permission of Fanatics, Inc."
Also, the file "author" is listed as Maxwell AFB, however, I do not see that or any author listed on that linked source page. Ooligan (talk) 13:32, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- The photo belongs in this lithograph ( https://www.rrauction.com/auctions/lot-detail/32377540373415-gathering-of-eagles-1995 ). It was made by Air Force personnel at Maxwell AFB in honor of the aviators who are inducted into the Gathering of Eagles program which is also based at Maxwell. There are similar portraits like this which are also in Commons and uses PD-USAF template as it was made by Air Force personnel. Bookish Worm (talk) 08:08, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:33, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Fake own work claim, grabbed from the web. 188.123.231.51 20:20, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:33, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of Aday.jpg Malik Nursultan B (talk) 20:38, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:34, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Didym as no permission (No permission since) VectorVoyager (talk) 22:44, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Ticket:2024060110000334 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 02:00, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Now has VRT. --Gbawden (talk) 18:34, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
not "own work" https://lens.google.com/search?ep=gsbubu&hl=de&re=df&p=AbrfA8q49D3QRraAv9fictQzBhpr8_wRojMEgWw7jkmdzQqdB9gGVgCEHi4hLfg5ZOI_0hitU1f-gFE3zVRvuFu9sO3hLX0YmH4IKY3i_pldBmZ6KP8Da42YO8ovLv_lPrid-HGVnW5b1KdgDvVsBgv4CTXOIaT5r5hhfADVwse5O0UAxc-FB1-OLpGv4M-i0xqN_cuo5MOCjsqFhg==#lns=W251bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLG51bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLDEsIkVrY0tKRE0zT1RCak9HVTBMVE5oTW1ZdE5EWTJZUzA1WkdJMUxUWTFNMlZqTlRGaFpUTmlOQklmUlRGSFFuRldNRGRIVERoVFRVbG5SM0JuU1V4dVVERnZka1ozVGw5U1p3PT0iLG51bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLG51bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLFtudWxsLG51bGwsW11dXQ== most probably copyvio Mateus2019 (talk) 22:47, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:35, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Probably COM:LL. No EXIF metadata. Suspect source https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zcFIGDpyuCk - hako9 23:33, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:35, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thirunavukkarasye-Raveendran (talk · contribs)
editDelete according to Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany#Stamps since 2012 German stamps are definitely not freely licensed and also not the work of the uploader.
- File:Ganzsache Plusbrief 2018 Leuchttürme Kampen-3.JPG
- File:Ganzsache Plusbrief 2018 Leuchttürme Kampen-2.JPG
- File:Ganzsache Plusbrief 2018 Leuchttürme Kampen-1.JPG
Ww2censor (talk) 23:17, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
- I am the uploader. My mistake, I thought that all german stamps are copyright free. Delete immediately! No further discussion needed. --Thirunavukkarasye-Raveendran (talk) 10:39, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:15, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thirunavukkarasye-Raveendran (talk · contribs)
editAI-generated images uploaded by a user who's creating a personal userpage Hungarian-German phrasebook on WikiBooks. No wider use of the images. COM:NOTHOST.
As befits a phrasebook, most of the content illustrates everyday scenes and concepts, like school and shops and food, which Commons already has genuine and more educationally useful photographs of. There's also some misgenerated text/information like File:Südamerika Phantasiekarte KI chatGPT.webp (a "fantasy map" of South America) in there.
- File:Anatomiemodell 1 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Anatomiemodell 2 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Anatomiemodell 3 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Anatomiemodell 4 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Anatomiemodell 5 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Supermarkt b 5 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Supermarkt b 4 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Supermarkt b 3 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Supermarkt b 2 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Supermarkt b 1 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Programmierer Monitor Textverarbeitung 1 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Ungarisch b 4 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Ungarisch b 3 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Ungarisch b 2 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Ungarisch b 1 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Kleidung b 15 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Kleidung b 14 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Kleidung b 13 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Kleidung b 12 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Kleidung b 11 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Kleidung b 10 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Kleidung b 9 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Kleidung b 8 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Kleidung b 7 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Kleidung b 6 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Kleidung b 5 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Kleidung b 4 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Kleidung b 3 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Kleidung b 2 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Kleidung b 1 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Baustelle b 2 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Baustelle b 11 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Baustelle b 10 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Baustelle b 9 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Baustelle b 6 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Baustelle b 8 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Baustelle b 7 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Baustelle b 5 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Baustelle b 4 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Baustelle b 3 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Baustelle b 1 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Gemüse KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Obst Setzkasten KI chatGPT.webp
- File:BeerenKI chatGPT.webp
- File:Ungarn Budapest mit Donau KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Hubschrauber schwebt über Krankenhaus KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Hubschrauber auf Krankenhaus mit Patient KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Mann am Monitor mit Taellenkalkulation KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Stadt b 7 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Stadt b 9 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Stadt b 6 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Stadt b 8 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Stadt b 5 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Stadt b 4 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Stadt b 3 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Stadt b 1 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Stadt Kleinstadt b 1 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Stadt b 2 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Stadtansicht 1 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Stadtansicht 2 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Stadtansicht 3 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Stadtansicht 4 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Synagoge Szeged KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Dom Szeged Kreuzschiff KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Auslage Fischtheke KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Auslage Kuchentheke KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Auslage Obst KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Auslage Käsetheke KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Auslage Wursttheke KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Supermarkt 3 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Supermarkt 2 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Supermarkt 4 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Supermarkt 1 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Kindergeburtstag a 7 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Kindergeburtstag a 6 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Kindergeburtstag a 5 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Kindergeburtstag a 4 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Kindergeburtstag a 3 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Kindergeburtstag a 2 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Kindergeburtstag a 1 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Kindergeburtstag Eisenbahn KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Schule Klasse 8 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Schule Klasse 7 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Schule Klasse 6 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Schule Klasse 5 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Schule Eingang 2 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Schule Klasse 4 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Schule Klasse 3 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Schule Klasse 2 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Schule Klasse 1 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Zoo Eingang KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Zoo Eisbärengehege KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Zoo Giraffen 2 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Zoo Giraffen 1 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Zoo Gorillagehege KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Essen Lebensmittel 2 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Essen Lebensmittel 1 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Essen Lebensmittel 3 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Essen am Tisch KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Kochen 1 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Kochen 2 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Kochen 3 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Kochen 4 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Essen Lebensmittel 4 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Kochen Lebensmittel 5 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Kochen Lebensmittel 6 KI chatPGT.webp
- File:Kochen 5 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Essen Truthahn im Ofen KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Kochen 7 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Kochen 8 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Kochen 9 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Essen telefonieren beim Kochen KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Kochen übergekocht KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Kochen Fischsuppe am Lagerfeuer Ki chatGPT.webp
- File:Kochen Kinder 1 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Essen Lebensmittel 8 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Pizza 1 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Pizza 2 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Ungarn Brunnen in der Puszta 1 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Ungarn Brunnen in der Puszta 2 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Ungarn Brunnen in der Puszta 3 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Ungarn ungarische Sprache 1 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Ungarn ungarische Fußballfans 2 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Ungarn Museum 3 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Ungarn Reiter in der Puszta 1 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Ungarn Charda-Tanz in einer Charda KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Kleidung - Damen 2 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Kleidung - Damen 1 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Kleidung - Herren 2 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Kleidung - Herren 1 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Kleidung - Kinder 1 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Napfkuchen - KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Südamerika Phantasiekarte KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Südamerika Anden hervorgehoben KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Kirche orthodox Winter KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Familie 1 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Familie 2 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Familie 3 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Familie 4 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Familie mit Bibeln KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Streik 3 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Streik 1 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Streik 2 Kinder KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Streik 4 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Überstunden KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Hunde zehn und Hasen drei KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Hasen und Fasan KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Feldhase 1 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Feldhase 2 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Mein letzter Arbeitstag 1 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Mein letzter Arbeitstag 2 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Ich benötige einen neuen Reisepass KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Mein Auto wurde gestohlen KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Mein erster Arbeitstag 1 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Mein erster Arbeitstag 2 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Mein letzter Arbeitstag 3 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Ich gehe in Rente 1 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Ich gehe in Rente 2 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Ich gehe in Rente 3 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Ich gehe in Rente 4 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Mein Sabbatjahr 2 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Mein Sabbatjahr 1 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Ich backe eine Pizza 2 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Ich backe eine Pizza 1 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Mein erstes Auto 2 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Mein erstes Auto 1 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Mein erstes Auto 3 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Das Auto und seine Teil KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Mein Bankkonto KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Das Markusevangelium 1 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Das Markusevangelium 2 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Das Markusevangelium 3 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Die Geschichte der ungarischen Sprache 1 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Die Geschichte der ungarischen Sprache 2 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Baustelle 5 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Baustelle 6 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Baustelle 3 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Baustelle 4 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Baustelle 1 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Baustelle 2 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Strandurlaub 2 KI chatGPG.webp
- File:Strandurlaub 1 KI chatGPG.webp
- File:Strandurlaub 4 KI chatGPG.webp
- File:Strandurlaub 3 KI chatGPG.webp
- File:Strandurlaub 5 KI chatGPG.webp
- File:Im Wald KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Tiere auf dem Bauernhof 2 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Tiere auf dem Bauernhof 1 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Tiere auf dem Bauernhof 3 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Tiere auf dem Bauernhof 4 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Zoo - Elefanten 2 KIchatGPT.webp
- File:Zoo - Elefanten 1 KIchatGPT.webp
- File:Zoo - Affen 2 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Zoo - Affen 1 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Zoo 2 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Zoo 1 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Zoo 3 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Zoo 4 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Schulklasse 1 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Schulklasse 2 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Schulklasse 3 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Schulklasse KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Kind auf Rutschbahn KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Trabant in Garage 1 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Trabant halb in Garage 1 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Kindergeburtstag 1 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Kindergeburtstag 2 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Programmiererin großer Nobitor Kopftuch Java-Programmierung KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Programmierer am Commodore 64 mit BASIC-ccode KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Programmierer BASIC--Programmierung KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Computer und Einzelteile KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Computer mit LED Licht KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Kind lernt Grundrechenarten 1 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Kind lernt Grundrechenarten 2 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Bibliothek modern 1 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Bibliothek antik KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Bibliothek Ausgang 1 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Sprachunterricht Kinder KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Sprachunterricht chinesische Tafel KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Bibliothek Regalwand 1 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Sprachunterricht Sprachkabinett 1 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Sprachunterricht sehr volle Klasse bunt 1 KI chatGPT.webp
- File:Peters Radtour.webp
Belbury (talk) 12:33, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- With these AI-pictures I am now in the process of publishing the hungarian language course online on Wikibooks-de. My AI-pictures make a dry language course much more interesting. They give further much incentive for discussions with the students in the newly learned hungarian language - "What do you see on the pictures? What is missing? What may be the story behind the pictures? What funny AI-mistakes do you recognise? Why they are mistakes? - These AI-pictures are no match with dry encyclopedic photographs in Commons? Would you prefer when I upload these AI-pictures locally on german Wikibooks? I am noct "creating a personal userpage" - I am just preparing my project thoroughly (see my huge completed books: Stenografisches Wörterbuch and Curso de alemán para principiantes con audio. --Thirunavukkarasye-Raveendran (talk) 13:40, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- And YES, please delet File:Südamerika Phantasiekarte KI chatGPT.webp, but don't use it as an argument for deletions of all the other AI-pictures.
- Thirunavukkarasye-Raveendran (talk) 15:11, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete I did some spot checking and these images depict common subjects - a house under construction or a forest - except at a singiciantly lower quality than the freely licensed images already on this project. AI shouldn't be used unless it absolutely has to be because of its inherent quality and accuracy issues, and I don't see how this tidal wave of garbage is a legitimate contribution to any project. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:08, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, including these recently uploaded "anatomy models":
- These images are right in the "uncanny valley" of looking close enough to real anatomical models to be potentially used in place of real images, but containing subtle inaccuracies which make them misleading (e.g. the random apple-shaped organ near the bottom of image 1, "pulmonary vessels" lying on top of the rib cage in image 2, etc). There are many images on Commons which depict human anatomy accurately; the only purpose these images serve is to create confusion. Omphalographer (talk) 20:55, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. Palemeditation (talk) 19:42, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 16:45, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of Russia.svg. Fry1989 eh? 19:52, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 09:15, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of Russia (1668-1693).svg. Fry1989 eh? 19:53, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 09:15, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of East Timor.svg. Fry1989 eh? 20:00, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 09:15, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Coat of arms of East Timor.svg. Fry1989 eh? 20:01, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 09:15, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Seal of the FBI.svg. Fry1989 eh? 20:03, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 09:15, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of Russia (1668-1693).svg. Fry1989 eh? 21:25, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Different format. I don't believe we usually delete a JPG for being a duplicate of a PNG. - Jmabel ! talk 04:55, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- I've made my response here. Fry1989 eh? 14:45, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 09:15, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of Uzbekistan.svg. Fry1989 eh? 22:44, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I don't believe we ever delete a JPG just because there is a matching SVG, but correct me if I'm wrong. - Jmabel ! talk 05:00, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- When an exact duplicate of a pre-existing SVG file is uploaded, it is generally deleted. We don't delete them where the raster image is different or was uploaded before the SVG. It is clear here that the file is simply a copy of the SVG I linked, and it therefore has no reason to exist. Fry1989 eh? 14:44, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 09:15, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Enterinsting (talk · contribs)
editNot own works. Proper source, author, date, and license must be provided.
- File:Найман 12.jpg
- File:Ильяс Джансугуров 7.jpg
- File:Ильяс Джансугуров 6.jpg
- File:Нарынбай би.jpg
- File:Матай 4.jpg
- File:Матай 3.jpg
- File:Матай 2.jpg
- File:Матай род 2.jpg
- File:Матай род.jpg
- File:Найман 11.jpg
- File:Naimanlar.jpg
- File:Найман 10.jpg
- File:Naiman Xanligi.jpg
- File:Найманское Ханство 2.jpg
- File:Найманское Ханство.jpg
- File:Матай.jpg
- File:Ерик Жолжаксынов.jpg
- File:Памятник Ади Шарипова.jpg
- File:Ади Шарипов.jpg
- File:Ильяс Джансугуров 3.jpg
- File:Ильяс Джансугуров 2.jpg
- File:Ильяс Джансугуров.jpg
- File:Naiman.jpg
- File:Қарауыл Дүйсен би.jpg
- File:Қарауылжасақ 2.jpg
- File:Қарауыл.jpg
- File:Қарауылжасақ.jpg
- File:Боке.jpg
- File:Танеке батыр 2.jpg
- File:Абыралинская восстания Найманы.jpg
- File:Бекжан батыр.jpg
Yann (talk) 20:38, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:54, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/"Fernando Botero - Au dela des formes"
editFernando Botero died in 2023, so his works are still protected by copyright for a long time. These are photos from inside a Belgian museum or of non-permanent posters, so COM:FOP Belgium does not apply. The files should therefore be deleted. They can be restored in 2094 (unless the works are considered "Colombian" works, then it'd be 2104).
* File:2021-11-14 12-50-10 ILCE-6500 DSC19823 Kiri DxO (51744792417).jpg
- File:2021-11-14 12-05-08 ILCE-7C DSC05690 DxO (51740065312).jpg
- File:2021-11-14 12-08-55 ILCE-7C DSC05720 DxO (51740629502).jpg
- File:2021-11-14 12-00-52 ILCE-6500 DSC19705 Kiri DxO (51740497546).jpg
- File:2021-11-14 12-06-05 ILCE-7C DSC05699 DxO (51741032346).jpg
- File:2021-11-14 12-12-06 ILCE-6500 DSC19739 Kiri DxO (51741480337).jpg
- File:2021-11-14 12-33-23 ILCE-6500 DSC19795 Kiri DxO (51744085107).jpg
- File:2021-11-14 12-07-16 ILCE-6500 DSC19720 Kiri DxO (51740356227).jpg
- File:2021-11-14 12-29-43 ILCE-7C DSC05859 DxO (51744310653).jpg
- File:2021-11-14 12-04-08 ILCE-7C DSC05678 DxO (51740742966).jpg
- File:2021-11-14 12-27-51 ILCE-7C DSC05839 DxO (51743504806).jpg
- File:2021-11-14 12-39-31 ILCE-7C DSC05955 DxO (51746117709).jpg
- File:2021-11-14 12-02-51 ILCE-7C DSC05670 DxO (51739839932).jpg
- File:2021-11-14 12-10-08 ILCE-7C DSC05726 DxO (51742305344).jpg
- File:2021-11-14 12-05-48 ILCE-7C DSC05693 DxO (51741598224).jpg
- File:2021-11-14 12-28-46 ILCE-7C DSC05851 DxO (51743020362).jpg
- File:2021-11-14 12-30-33 ILCE-7C DSC05866 DxO (51743360212).jpg
- File:2021-11-14 11-58-51 ILCE-6500 DSC19698 Kiri DxO (51741204940).jpg
- File:2021-11-14 12-31-34 ILCE-7C DSC05879 DxO (51743730582).jpg
- File:2021-11-14 12-21-15 ILCE-7C DSC05819 DxO (51742456007).jpg
- File:2021-11-14 12-28-38 ILCE-7C DSC05848 DxO (51744649045).jpg
- File:2021-11-14 12-08-16 ILCE-7C DSC05713 DxO (51741346856).jpg
- File:2021-11-14 12-14-47 ILCE-6500 DSC19742 Kiri DxO (51743424530).jpg
- File:2021-11-14 12-04-41 ILCE-7C DSC05683 DxO (51740813621).jpg
- File:2021-11-14 12-09-51 ILCE-7C DSC05722 DxO (51741551346).jpg
* File:2021-11-14 12-49-05 ILCE-7C DSC05969 DxO (51744724667).jpg
- File:2021-11-14 12-07-01 ILCE-7C DSC05702 DxO (51741746644).jpg
- File:2021-11-14 12-31-47 ILCE-7C DSC05881 DxO (51745318014).jpg
- File:2021-11-14 12-33-41 ILCE-7C DSC05900 DxO (51745992580).jpg
- File:2021-11-14 12-07-52 ILCE-7C DSC05710 DxO (51741900494).jpg
- File:2021-11-14 12-11-51 ILCE-7C DSC05740 DxO (51742695649).jpg
- File:2021-11-14 12-28-25 ILCE-7C DSC05844 DxO (51744481705).jpg
- File:2021-11-14 12-19-05 ILCE-6500 DSC19751 Kiri DxO (51743489369).jpg
- File:2021-11-14 11-58-47 ILCE-7C DSC05644 DxO (51739397632).jpg
- File:2021-11-14 12-29-08 ILCE-7C DSC05855 DxO (51743950281).jpg
- File:2021-11-14 11-51-37 ILCE-7C DSC05637 DxO (51740352828).jpg
- File:2021-11-14 12-00-50 ILCE-7C DSC05653 DxO (51740641378).jpg
- File:2021-11-14 12-13-13 ILCE-7C DSC05755 DxO (51742428431).jpg
- File:2021-11-14 12-31-26 ILCE-7C DSC05877 DxO (51745319830).jpg
- File:2021-11-14 12-16-30 ILCE-6500 DSC19747 Kiri DxO (51742750721).jpg
- File:2021-11-14 12-02-21 ILCE-7C DSC05666 DxO (51740809173).jpg
- File:2021-11-14 12-10-49 ILCE-6500 DSC19733 Kiri DxO (51742162523).jpg
- File:2021-11-14 11-50-49 ILCE-7C DSC05628 DxO (51739183537).jpg
Rosenzweig τ 01:05, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep File:2021-11-14 12-07-16 ILCE-6500 DSC19720 Kiri DxO (51740356227).jpg File:2021-11-14 12-04-08 ILCE-7C DSC05678 DxO (51740742966).jpg File:2021-11-14 12-04-41 ILCE-7C DSC05683 DxO (51740813621).jpg File:2021-11-14 12-07-01 ILCE-7C DSC05702 DxO (51741746644).jpg File:2021-11-14 11-51-37 ILCE-7C DSC05637 DxO (51740352828).jpg File:2021-11-14 11-50-49 ILCE-7C DSC05628 DxO (51739183537).jpg these files are de minimis El Nuevo Doge (talk) 00:52, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Still Delete for those. Either you still see too much of the copyrighted art, or the crops reduced the files to photos of nondescript people or museum rooms which are out of project scope. --Rosenzweig τ 10:07, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- File:2021-11-14 12-49-05 ILCE-7C DSC05969 DxO (51744724667).jpg bricks are not copyrightable El Nuevo Doge (talk) 00:54, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
::Those bricks might not be copyrightable, but they're not properly described either. If we don't know more about them than "a strange pile of bricks sitting in a museum in Belgium", that file should be deleted as out of project scope. --Rosenzweig τ 10:07, 1 June 2024 (UTC) nomination withdrawn (here), work of another artist --Rosenzweig τ 13:20, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment I've removed two files from this DR (withdrawing) because I found they're works by another artist. --Rosenzweig τ 13:20, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:29, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
The image is tagged as {{PD-old}}, but the photographers were still alive 70 years ago. You can see in this copy (or another photo from the same shoot) that the photographers were the G. L. Manuel brothers G. L. Manuel brothers, who died in 1967 and 1971 respectively. This means the photo will be copyrighted in the country of origin until 2042. hinnk (talk) 02:11, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nominator, but, you have to link to wikidata:Q42424625 not wikidata:G. L. Manuel brothers. - Sebbog13 (talk) 13:34, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Fixed, thank you! hinnk (talk) 22:41, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:30, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope as plain text (ꯃꯥꯔꯖꯤꯡ) The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:51, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. File is in use. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:59, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:31, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 15:08, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:51, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 09:06, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:34, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- File:Panini Maradona Supersport (alternate scan).jpg
- File:Diego Maradona at Mexico 86 (Panini Supersport).jpg
This file was initially tagged by ComputerHotline as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyvio
It's a derivative work of an existing Commons file. I can't speak to the copyright status of Panini cards, but this is not eligible for speedy deletion. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:51, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Of course this is not elegible for speedy deletion. But what did the nominator allege to consider this card a "copyvio"? Fma12 (talk) 15:16, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- It's unclear. The only explanation ComputerHotline gave for tagging this image as copyvio was "copyvio", which I found to be not too helpful. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 17:04, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- DW? Also it says panini but I see no Italian sandwiches in the image... 🙄 186.172.148.220 17:50, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- It's unclear. The only explanation ComputerHotline gave for tagging this image as copyvio was "copyvio", which I found to be not too helpful. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 17:04, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete It was published by the Italian company Panini in 1986. It is currently in the public domain in Italy, where the copyright duration for simple photographs is 20 years, but it was not in 1996 at URAA time. Thus, it still copyrighted in the US. Günther Frager (talk) 16:58, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I added the other scans from the same card. Günther Frager (talk) 17:01, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment "Copyvio" is insufficient for an image which has an existing rationale. If ComputerHotline (talk · contribs) believes this to be in error, they should explain their case more clearly- it's not up to us to guess what they thought or meant. Ubcule (talk) 17:48, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I uploaded the other two versions in good faith based on the same rationale as the original:- "PD/licensing rationale given below is taken from File:Panini maradona supersport.jpg and assumed to be legitimate here too (since this is an alternate scan of the same image)." If the original is to be deleted, then so should they. Ubcule (talk) 17:48, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:36, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from background, posters, advertisement.
- File:Kamiono kun glaciaĵoj alportinta ilin al superbazaro Magnit (Tjumeno).jpg
- File:Venkotago sur la placo de la 400-a datreveno de Tjumeno (2024) 24.jpg
- File:Venkotago sur la placo de la 400-a datreveno de Tjumeno (2024) 22.jpg
- File:Venkotago sur la placo de la 400-a datreveno de Tjumeno (2024) 23.jpg
- File:Venkotago sur la placo de la 400-a datreveno de Tjumeno (2024) 21.jpg
- File:Venkotago sur la placo de la 400-a datreveno de Tjumeno (2024) 19.jpg
- File:Venkotago sur la placo de la 400-a datreveno de Tjumeno (2024) 20.jpg
- File:Venkotago sur la placo de la 400-a datreveno de Tjumeno (2024) 18.jpg
- File:Venkotago sur la placo de la 400-a datreveno de Tjumeno (2024) 13.jpg
- File:Venkotago sur la placo de la 400-a datreveno de Tjumeno (2024) 11.jpg
- File:Venkotago sur la placo de la 400-a datreveno de Tjumeno (2024) 12.jpg
- File:Venkotago sur la placo de la 400-a datreveno de Tjumeno (2024) 07.jpg
- File:Venkotago sur la placo de la 400-a datreveno de Tjumeno (2024) 05.jpg
- File:Venkotago sur la placo de la 400-a datreveno de Tjumeno (2024) 06.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
The background image behind the dancers is not the main or even significant object of the image. Therefore, such images are widely published in Russian and foreign media without any legal consequences. RG72 (talk) 04:17, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- It can be found all over the internet and nobody has complained? Delete per nom. Quick1984 (talk) 14:01, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:37, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
poor photo quality Naturpuur (talk) 08:47, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; very poor quality, not in use, there are much better photos of that particular street corner like File:Villach Innenstadt Moritschstrasse 1 Leiningerhof 02072018 3815.jpg and of the sculpture as well in Category:Kirchtagspaar by Egon Gruber. --Gestumblindi (talk) 11:33, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Wrong to say that 300 words of opinion written by a specific person "contains no original authorship". No suggestion that this piece of text was ever released under a free licence. Belbury (talk) 15:00, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- For the record, this file is described as:
Screenshot of the description of the Me at the zoo video criticizing YouTube's decision to remove public dislike counts in November 2021.
- The cited source is a Twitter post.
- The file is used at en:Me at the zoo, which explains why the video is notable and how its description is occasionally used to criticize YouTube. Brianjd (talk) 15:13, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, not freely licensed. Should be uploaded locally with a fair use rationale. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 00:55, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per Belbury and Compassionate727. The text is surely copyrighted and there is no free licence. --Gestumblindi (talk) 11:51, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
1) it just shows "Sorry, the file Undefined cannot be displayed since it is not present on the current page. Go to corresponding file page" 2) what is this supposed to show? Prototyperspective (talk) 15:16, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Please don't (ab)use the deletion process for bugs. Multichill (talk) 22:48, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Just delete it then. Prototyperspective (talk) 00:13, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Multichill: The nominator has a point: to my untrained eye, it is not at all clear what this file is supposed to show. The filename, description and categories are all generic and unhelpful. Brianjd (talk) 15:16, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: The file displays just fine for me, but I agree with nominator's point 2) and with Brianjd - the subject is an unidentified blob with no helpful description whatsoever, which makes the file out of scope. It's also not needed as an example for an STL file as there are enough other STL files on Commons. --Gestumblindi (talk) 11:38, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Mass upload by a flickr user without file description and without benefit for an encyclopaedia. Xocolatl (talk) 17:22, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: procedural close, was already deleted as part of Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files from William J Sisti stream. --Gestumblindi (talk) 11:55, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
out of scope Ⳑ (talk) 18:41, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep withdraw Ⳑ (talk) 20:40, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: valid picture of an Akita Inu dog and nomination withdrawn by nominator. --Gestumblindi (talk) 11:48, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Not an own work. 186.173.19.66 03:51, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Can you please provide a link that shows where the photo was taken from? Schwede66 16:29, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Um... I took it? Dhantegge (talk) 10:58, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hey bro... no. I was at the hīkoi the other day and I took this photo myself. What could possibly suggest otherwise? Dhantegge (talk) 10:59, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Seems believable that Dhantegge took this - image didnt reverse image search on Google, Tineye, or Yandex. TheLoyalOrder (talk) 08:28, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Dhantegge: The PNG file format suggests that this is not an own work. I’m not trying to suggest anything, just explain why this file might seem suspicious. Brianjd (talk) 14:55, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- I guess they might have cropped it in photoshop, if they had the uncropped version that might help? TheLoyalOrder (talk) 00:43, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Do I have to upload the original uncropped file to prove this? Dhantegge (talk) 08:23, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oh, you mean because of it being a PNG and not a JPEG, because normally files when uploaded are default JPEG? Well that's easy to explain. I edited the original in Lightroom and cropped it in Photoshop. But I don't see the point in uploading the original just to prove I took it. @TheLoyalOrder did a reverse image search and proved it already Dhantegge (talk) 08:23, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- technically not 100% proved since it just means no where has indexed the potential origin yet. I did have a look elsewhere and didnt find it, he was wearing the clothes in the stated place at the stated time (Wellington 30 May). Im leaning on the side that it is original, but if you do have the uncropped version is there a reason to not upload? TheLoyalOrder (talk) 08:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Well, of course not, but it's just that I took several hundred photos that day for my own personal use. I remembered that Rāwiri did not have his own infobox picture, so I cropped a photo of one of the ones I took of him and uploaded it. I chose a PNG because it makes for better quality. The reason why I didn't just uploaded the original is because it had a few other people in it, including people I know, and I didn't want to be a dick and put them on the Internet for no reason. Dhantegge (talk) 10:20, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- BTW @TheLoyalOrder, I'm not annoyed at you and I know you're just doing your job and everything. If there was a message telling me not to upload in PNG format I would have done that to avoid all the fuss. If you really thought it was necessary I could upload the original or maybe a screenshot of all the photos from that day in my files. Dhantegge (talk) 10:22, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- technically not 100% proved since it just means no where has indexed the potential origin yet. I did have a look elsewhere and didnt find it, he was wearing the clothes in the stated place at the stated time (Wellington 30 May). Im leaning on the side that it is original, but if you do have the uncropped version is there a reason to not upload? TheLoyalOrder (talk) 08:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Alright everyone, I've uploaded the original.
- Dhantegge (talk) 11:45, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Clearly appropriately labeled own work. —Tcr25 (talk) 17:22, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- I guess they might have cropped it in photoshop, if they had the uncropped version that might help? TheLoyalOrder (talk) 00:43, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:59, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Unused logo. File:LOGOSAES.png is a higher quality version of the same image (not eligible for speedy deletion b/c of different formats, grey text) The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:55, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:00, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hugo en résidence (talk · contribs)
editCollection of low-quality AI 'stock art'. Two images are used in a non-mainspace page with some warning tags (not sure what it is) and the rest are unused. Out of scope.
- File:Images-Stair scientist explains-dalle2.jpg
- File:Images-Stair scientist explains-dalle1.jpg
- File:Illustration for Technical museum collection-05.jpg
- File:Illustration for Technical museum collection-04.jpg
- File:Illustration for Technical museum collection-03.png
- File:Illustration for Technical museum collection-02.png
- File:Illustration for Technical museum collection-01.png
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:20, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hello User:The Squirrel Conspiracy, what are the "some warning tags" you are talking about ? I'm using those images for educational purpose along my Wikimedia Résidence at University of Toulouse, to illustrates Wikipedia / AI training and workshop presentations. You may see my Gallery of Wikipedia and & co training presentations, search « Bing », where I argue Public Domain AI images can beneficially replace copyrighted images when opening up documents. I indeed use 2 of the images above to replace copyrighted images in documents I successfully lobbied to republish under open license on Wikipedia, see . In both cases, It seem useful to share those media resources back on Commons. Hugo en résidence (talk) 12:12, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- No reply after four weeks, so let me take a guess: The nominator was presumably referring to the "en travaux" ("under contruction") and "Ébauche" ("stub") tags on top of fr:Aide:Bonnes pratiques pour les collections scientifiques et techniques. Unclear why those should matter for the purposes of this deletion request thought. Regards, HaeB (talk) 22:06, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Keep File:Illustration for Technical museum collection-02.png and File:Images-Stair scientist explains-dalle2.jpg per COM:INUSE (which is not limited to mainspace pages). Not sure about the rest. Regards, HaeB (talk) 22:06, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. These images are full of nonsense features (Escher-like stairways, impossible tools, misrepresentations of scientific equipment, etc.) For images that appear to be intended to represent scientific and technical topics, misleading representations are entirely inappropriate and therefore outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 12:29, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep images used in wikimedia-related presentations/materials (if I understand the response above) are typically considered in scope. How realistic they look is secondary. — Rhododendrites talk | 13:09, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: kept two indentified as in use, and deleted remainder. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:03, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
The shape of the logo includes the figure that emerges from the blue outline and the arrangement and angle of the characters is unique, so it could be exceeding the threshold of originality and not be a mere text. Taichi (talk) 06:29, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:04, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
کیفیت عکس پایین است Pouyayaghoubkish (talk) 07:42, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:09, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Sinigh as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The CC licensing is not backed up by the source.: Unclear whether this meets COM:TOO Netherlands. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 09:53, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak delete Precaution (upload possibly in conflict with COM:TOO Netherlands). Unused image whose educational or encyclopedic usefulness is debatable. Sinigh (talk) 11:19, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:10, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Just Step Sideways as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: obvious copyrighted logo of [8], only use was on now-deleted spam page at en.wp: Obviously below COM:TOO, scope concerns should be settled with a DR. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 09:54, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- That just strikes me as needless process when it is clearly not their own work at all. Just Step Sideways (talk) 16:48, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Just Step Sideways: The nominator asserts that this file is below COM:TOO, that is, too simple to be copyrighted. If it is not copyrighted, then it cannot be a copyright violation and a false ‘own work’ claim does not automatically make it eligible for deletion. Brianjd (talk) 15:00, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- I understad the argument, that we look past the lying from the uploader because technically we could keep this unused spam image, I just don't see the point. Just Step Sideways (talk) 15:03, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Just Step Sideways: I don’t think anyone is saying that we should keep this image, only that it must go through the proper process. Speedy deletion is supposed to be used only in very specific circumstances (admittedly, blatant advertising is one of those circumstances, so I’m not sure what to think here). Brianjd (talk) 15:33, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- I understad the argument, that we look past the lying from the uploader because technically we could keep this unused spam image, I just don't see the point. Just Step Sideways (talk) 15:03, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Just Step Sideways: The nominator asserts that this file is below COM:TOO, that is, too simple to be copyrighted. If it is not copyrighted, then it cannot be a copyright violation and a false ‘own work’ claim does not automatically make it eligible for deletion. Brianjd (talk) 15:00, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:10, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Kitayama as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Author died 1968 (< 70 years).. {{PD-Sweden-photo}} is possible, also see File talk:Karlstad 1955-07-20.jpg (which should be clarified via VRT). —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 10:24, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Clarification process is ongoing, the uploader has inherited the copyright from his grandfather. VRT ticket #2024053110006033, please do not delete until we're done. Riggwelter (talk) 19:37, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep image and close this request. Uploader has now updated the image description and the image's license has been clarified. Riggwelter (talk) 17:43, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:11, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
This is a photo of a work of art inside a museum in Belgium, titled Bais Bois and signed Raphaël Decoster 2020. So apparently it's a contemporary, copyrighted work by Belgian artist Raphaël Decoster, born in 1988 and apparently alive. There is no freedom of panorama inside museums in Belgium. The file should therefore be deleted. It can be restored 70 years pma. Rosenzweig τ 11:10, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- I am adding
- to this deletion request (showing what is apparently the wooden printing plate used to create the print shown by the other file). --Rosenzweig τ 11:20, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:19, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
File:Mini-Holland programme, Outer London – low (yellow) and high (purple) dose areas at Wave 1, as defined by stakeholders in advance of that year's survey wave.jpg
editcan somebody please clarify which map this shows / whether it's truly CCBY (is openstreetmap ccby?) Prototyperspective (talk) 13:34, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep if it is CCBY obviously. This is just so this is clarified. Prototyperspective (talk) 16:05, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:20, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
wrong license Benstown (talk) 14:08, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:20, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Przedstawia wnętrze kościoła Narodzenia Najświętszej Maryi Panny w Centawie, a nie w Rożnowie Jacek Daczyński (talk) 14:09, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Przykro mi za pomyłkę. Proponuję, żeby nie usuwać zdjęcia. Postawię wniosek o zmianę nazwy.
- Der Fehler tut mir Leid. Ich schlage vor, das Foto nicht zu löschen, sondern umzubenennen. Gliwi (talk) 18:05, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; please use {{Rename}} to have image name corrected. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:21, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Imagen desactualizada y sin autorización de uso Ivetteceli (talk) 14:41, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:24, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
not PD-PRC-exempt
- File:China Orient Asset Management.png
- File:China Huarong Asset Management.png
- File:China Great Wall Asset Management.png
- File:CICC Logo.png
- File:FountainVest Partners.png
shizhao (talk) 02:33, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Fitindia (talk) 17:10, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Complex logo exceeding COM:TOO China
Wcam (talk) 15:11, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:24, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Wcam as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G4|Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Flags of cities in China This file predates the DR and it is heavily used. Yann (talk) 15:17, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete In China, official city flags are not automatically exempt from copyright protection. It is the consensus of numerous DRs in the past that {{PD-PRC-exempt}} only covers textual documents and does not cover images. Wcam (talk) 15:19, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:25, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Wcam as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G4|Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Flags of cities in China This file predates the DR and it is heavily used. Yann (talk) 15:17, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete This is a city emblem and not the uploader's own work. In China, official city flags are not automatically exempt from copyright protection as it is not an item listed in {{PD-PRC-exempt}}. It is the consensus of numerous DRs in the past that {{PD-PRC-exempt}} only covers textual documents and does not cover images. Wcam (talk) 15:19, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep哈尔滨市市旗市徽制作和使用管理暂行办法,哈尔滨市人民政府令[9]-北極企鵝觀賞團 (talk) 14:09, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- But {{PD-PRC-exempt}} only applies to texts, not images. Wcam (talk) 21:49, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep哈尔滨市市旗市徽制作和使用管理暂行办法,哈尔滨市人民政府令[9]-北極企鵝觀賞團 (talk) 14:09, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- 法律、法規,國家機關的決議、決定、命令和其他具有立法、行政、司法性質的文件,及其官方正式譯文;這個市徽是原來是官方命令,文件原來應該有“图示”,但不知什麼原因沒有archive顯示--北極企鵝觀賞團 (talk) 01:16, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and previous consensus; to restart that whole conversation about the application of the law, best it occur Com:VPC. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:27, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
a official logo which was created in 2020. the current licensing is invalid. איש עיטי (talk) 15:22, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:27, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Морской свин as Copyvio (copyvio): unclear whether this meets COM:TOO Russia. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 16:18, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; appears too simple for US TOO, and no evidence that this is not the case with Russian TOO. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:29, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Foto desactualizada y sin autorización para uso Ivetteceli (talk) 16:47, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- No reason at all for this request.--Freddy eduardo (talk) 04:50, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:29, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
file was uploaded to q:fa:پرونده:Sheik_Ahmad_Jami_statue_in_Torbat-e_Jam.jpg in 2011 so not likely own work by uploader on Commons. Also there does not seem to be COM:FOP Iran. MGA73 (talk) 17:37, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:29, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Source video is a person (not the person pictured here) talking generally about some subject and including various publicity shots and TV clips of different Korean groups from the 1990s. One such still has been cropped to get this image. Although the video itself is CC-BY licenced it seems unlikely the channel had acquired the publicity photos under terms which allowed them to rerelease them as CC-BY under their own name. Belbury (talk) 17:40, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: fair use not allowed, video appears to have fair use in the video and not transferable; per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:31, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
cropped version of image that's used by the subject on Twitter: https://x.com/andacyapicier/photo Adeletron 3030 (talk) 18:30, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:33, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Il contient les données GPS de la phots et je souhaite garder ça privé. Margaux Fritschy (talk) 14:33, 18 July 2024 (UTC) Margaux Fritschy (talk) 18:32, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; recent upload, unused. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:34, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
This painting is under copyright, as shown at https://www.sfmoma.org/artwork/98.200/ The artist died in 2023. Stevensaylor (talk) 18:34, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; fair use not allowed; undeleted at enWP. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:38, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
I originally uploaded this logo as PD-textlogo, but now I'm not so sure if that's accurate. The logo was 3D rendered and has texture to appear as if it's made of stone. Di (they-them) (talk) 18:46, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:39, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
This image is copyright. On Flickr it is a scan of another photographer’s work and should not be licensed as such there. Maungapohatu (talk) 18:52, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Why? Andy Dingley (talk) 20:12, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Andy Dingley: Delete The Flickr upload is in the album Boeing 737-300 slide scan collection, which has this description:
Various sources: scans from 35mm-slides in my collection and not my own shots...
- I see no evidence that this file is freely licensed. Brianjd (talk) 12:59, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Andy Dingley: Delete The Flickr upload is in the album Boeing 737-300 slide scan collection, which has this description:
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:40, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Regardless of the VRT tickets, the uploader has 49 uploads deleted as copyright violations. Also taken by at least two different cameras (two files are lacking any metadata).
Didym (talk) 19:05, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:40, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 19:08, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep — The file contains valid EXIF and doesn't appear elsewhere in an image search, so there's no reason to doubt the uploader's claim that it's their own work. The other file they recently uploaded, File:Linda Menard Official Photo.jpg, is a clear copyvio, however. Their talk page offers hints that they may not fully understand how things work around here. Is the nominator doing anything to help correct that?RadioKAOS (talk) 19:58, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:41, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Uploader asserts that this is a work by Emma Ferrer, but that "Picture is privately owned by used and, therefore, has rights to post". But that's not how copyright works (the original artist who created a painting retains the copyright over it, even if the painting is in the physical possession of a different person). HaeB (talk) 19:08, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:42, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Satqanbaeva Maral (talk · contribs)
editunlikely to be own work
- File:Tatibaev ko'chasi.jpg
- File:Yomg'irdan keyingi ko'rinish.jpg
- File:Qiriqqiz shaharchasidagi bolalar maydonchasi.jpg
- File:Buzoqcha 2.jpg
- File:Berdoq bobo masjididagi namoz o'qish jarayoni.jpg
- File:Qoraqalpog'iston posyolkasi ko'chasi 2.jpg
- File:Qoraqalpog'iston posyolkasida Navro'z.jpg
- File:Qishqi yig'im.jpg
- File:Qoraqalpog'iston posyolkasi.jpg
- File:Sayg'oq.jpg
- File:Tu'ya1.jpg
- File:Qo'y2.jpg
- File:Shomanayda quyosh botishi.jpg
- File:Nukusdagi IT park imorati.jpg
- File:Nukusda quyosh chiqishi.jpg
- File:Berdoq Bobo masjidi.jpg
- File:A.Shamuratova ko'chasi 2.jpg
- File:TATU NF.jpg
- File:Imom eshon Muhammad jome masjidi 2.jpg
- File:Imom eshon Muhammad jome masjidi.jpg
- File:Berdoq nomidagi QDU.jpg
- File:Tungi Nukus.jpg
- File:Vokzal2023.jpg
- File:Sarijar2023.jpg
- File:Gazeta2023.jpg
- File:Buzoq.jpg
- File:Yozgi dush.jpg
- File:A.Shamuratova ko'chasi.jpg
- File:Bosma kran.jpg
- File:Kamalak.jpg
- File:Nur ota ko'chasi.jpg
- File:Nukus 2024.jpg
Didym (talk) 19:48, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:43, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Fehllizenziert Lutheraner (talk) 20:15, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Wie muss ich "fehllizenziert" verstehen?
- Es handelt sich um eine Eigenaufnahme des Abgebildeten, die er selber auf einer anderen Seite (wikialpha) hochgeladen hat mit dem Hinweis "Content is available under Public Domain unless otherwise noted.", ergänzt durch ein "Public Domain"-Logo am Seitenfuss. Wenn ich das Englisch richtig verstehe, heisst das: Inhalt unter der Public Domain Lizenz, ausser anderweitig vermerkt. Genau das habe ich hingeschrieben und aus dem verschiedenen Lizenzen, die Wikipedia zur Auswahl anbietet Public Domain ausgewählt. Was habe ich da falsch gemacht?
- In der englischen Wikipedia lese ich: {{CC0}} This is the preferred choice for all new self-released public domain works. Wäre das die richtige Lizenz? Bombo (talk) 20:52, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:44, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Fake own work claim, grabbed from the web. 188.123.231.51 20:18, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:45, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Molinier13 (talk · contribs)
edit"Unknown source" and "Unknown author" are not proper source and author parameters for such pictures, 3 other files by uploader are copyvios
- File:Senador Provincial Marcelo Rubio.jpg
- File:Senador Provincial Marcelo Rubio junto al entonces Gobernador Alfredo Cornejo.jpg
Nutshinou Talk! 20:19, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. We need the provenance of the photos in order to keep them. Günther Frager (talk) 19:21, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:45, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Fake own work claim, grabbed from the web. 188.123.231.51 20:20, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, but it's too old, 90% PD. 186.172.16.70 01:08, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:47, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Alachuckthebuck as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F1, Possible copyright violation: No evidence of a free license at the claimed source. All the best -- Chuck Talk 20:32, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- In use at en-wiki, but the article reads like an advertisement. All the best -- Chuck Talk 20:33, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately this file does not have an author and the person shared it without any License RiversAndForest (talk) 20:39, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- You are the uploader. All the best -- Chuck Talk 21:41, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Comment Deletion requested by the uploader shortly after upload, but still COM:INUSE at en:Sammi Deen Baloch. --Rosenzweig τ 10:55, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: cited as coming from X, no evidence of suitable licence; deleted per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:48, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by HUNGCHILIN (talk · contribs)
editUser:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 我將找出能證明的原始檔案,請勿刪除。
unlikely to be own work
- File:前聯合報新聞攝影中心主任林錫銘.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 此人已經死亡,這是他的喪禮用照片
- File:20170530二龍競渡影像展.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20170530二龍競渡影像展1.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20180618二龍競渡.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的祭典原始檔
- File:220180613二龍競渡洲仔尾迎神祭拜龍船.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的祭典原始檔
- File:20170530二龍競渡.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的祭典原始檔
- File:20170530二龍競渡淇武蘭開港路1.jpg
- File:20170530二龍競渡洲仔尾開港路.jpg
- File:20170530二龍競渡淇武蘭開港路.jpg
- File:20160611二龍競渡洲仔尾.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的祭典原始檔
- File:20160611二龍競渡臨時碼頭與觀眾.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的祭典原始檔
- File:20160611二龍競渡淇武蘭.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的祭典原始檔
- File:20160611二龍競渡1.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的祭典原始檔
- File:20160611二龍競渡耆老隊.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的祭典原始檔
- File:20160611二龍競渡.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的祭典原始檔
- File:20160611二龍競渡洲仔尾龍船下水.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的祭典原始檔
- File:20160611二龍競渡洲仔尾爐主祭港燒巾衣冥紙小銀.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的祭典原始檔
- File:20160611二龍競渡淇武蘭下水.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的祭典原始檔
- File:20180618二龍競渡點睛.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的祭典原始檔
- File:20180618二龍競渡頭趟洲仔尾奪標.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的祭典原始檔
- File:20230622二龍競渡洲仔尾爐主祭港.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的祭典原始檔
- File:20230622二龍競渡坐式體驗船體驗.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20230622二龍競渡坐式體驗船.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20230622二龍競渡洲仔尾裝龍骨勒肚.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20230622二龍競渡洲仔尾插尾送旗國泰民安.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20230622二龍競渡洲仔尾安裝尾桮.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20230622二龍競渡洲仔尾爐主祭拜龍船.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20220603二龍競渡村民祭港22.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20220603二龍競渡村民祭港21.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20220603二龍競渡村民祭港20.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20220603二龍競渡村民祭港19.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20220603二龍競渡村民祭港18.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20220603二龍競渡村民祭港17.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20220603二龍競渡村民祭港16.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20220603二龍競渡村民祭港14.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20220603二龍競渡村民祭港15.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20220603二龍競渡村民祭港13.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20220603二龍競渡村民祭港12.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20220603二龍競渡村民祭港11.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20220603二龍競渡村民祭港10.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20220603二龍競渡村民祭港8.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20220603二龍競渡村民祭港9.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20220603二龍競渡村民祭港7.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20220603二龍競渡村民祭港4.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20220603二龍競渡村民祭港6.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20220603二龍競渡村民祭港5.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20220603二龍競渡村民祭港2.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20220603二龍競渡村民祭港1.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20220603二龍競渡村民祭港3.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20190607二龍競渡村民祭港23.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20190607二龍競渡村民祭港22.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20190607二龍競渡村民祭港21.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20190607二龍競渡村民祭港20.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20190607二龍競渡村民祭港19.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20190607二龍競渡村民祭港17.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20190607二龍競渡村民祭港18.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20190607二龍競渡村民祭港16.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20190607二龍競渡村民祭港14.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20190607二龍競渡村民祭港15.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20190607二龍競渡村民祭港13.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20190607二龍競渡村民祭港12.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20190607二龍競渡村民祭港11.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20190607二龍競渡村民祭港10.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20190607二龍競渡村民祭港9.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20190607二龍競渡村民祭港8.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20190607二龍競渡村民祭港7.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20190607二龍競渡村民祭港6.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20190607二龍競渡村民祭港5.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20190607二龍競渡村民祭港4.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20190607二龍競渡村民祭港3.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20190607二龍競渡村民祭港1.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20190607二龍競渡村民祭港2.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:二龍天護祠 正面.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 此為當天我拍攝的原稿,佐證,可見到檔案大小很大,請勿刪除。
- File:二龍天護祠門.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 此為當天我拍攝的原稿,佐證,可見到檔案大小很大,請勿刪除。
- File:二龍天護祠 天護聖媽.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 此為當天我拍攝的原稿,佐證,可見到檔案大小很大,請勿刪除。
- File:20240427二龍太陽廟志工.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 此為當天我拍攝的原稿,佐證,可見到檔案大小很大,請勿刪除。
- File:20240427二龍太陽廟祭拜.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 此為當天我拍攝的原稿,佐證,可見到檔案大小很大,請勿刪除。
- File:20240427二龍太陽廟廟地.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 此為當天我拍攝的原稿,佐證,可見到檔案大小很大,請勿刪除。
- File:20240427二龍太陽廟梨園.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 此為當天我拍攝的原稿,佐證,可見到檔案大小很大,請勿刪除。
- File:20240427二龍太陽廟委員.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 此為當天我拍攝的原稿,佐證,可見到檔案大小很大,請勿刪除。
- File:20240427二龍太陽廟.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 此為當天我拍攝的原稿,佐證,可見到檔案大小很大,請勿刪除。
- File:20230622二龍競渡洲仔尾請觀禮神.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 此為當天我拍攝的原稿,佐證,可見到檔案大小很大,請勿刪除。
- File:20231028龍峰頭林謝府元帥五顯大帝神明會 神明.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 此為當天我拍攝的原稿,佐證,可見到檔案大小很大,請勿刪除。
- File:20231028龍峰頭林謝府元帥五顯大帝神明會 輪值爐主.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 此為當天我拍攝的原稿,佐證,可見到檔案大小很大,請勿刪除。
- File:20170529二龍競渡回顧展 淇武蘭尾桮尾後送.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20170529二龍競渡回顧展 洲仔尾尾桮尾後送.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20170529二龍競渡回顧展 洲仔尾船桮.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20170529二龍競渡回顧展 淇武蘭船桮.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20170529二龍競渡回顧展枷車索.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20170529二龍競渡回顧展 龍船鑼龍船緣金簿淨香盤紙頭.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20220603二龍村龍舟競渡洲仔尾綁船.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:二龍村洲仔尾開基祖 龍峰頭林日隆公十三世 林硯 皇清待贈 諡溫文.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
- File:20230622二龍村龍舟競渡洲仔尾開港路.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的祭典原始檔
- File:20230622二龍村龍舟競渡觀眾.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 此為當天我拍攝的原稿,佐證,可見到檔案大小很大,請勿刪除。我有連續拍2張。
- File:二龍村村民祭港1.jpg User:HUNGCHILIN|HUNGCHILIN 說明 : 請勿刪除。已經更新為 檔案更大的原始檔
Didym (talk) 20:53, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: images have been overwritten with other images, no clarity on what is happening, so clear the decks; per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:50, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
License laundering. The source (archived here) is clearly taken from Al Arabiya interview (here) and the author has no rights over it. Anwon (talk) 20:56, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:50, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Because it is Logo Tytoalba (talk) 21:01, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep not a valid grounds for deletion. The logo in question is probably below the threshold of originality for copyright and, independent of that, may well be old enough to be out of copyright even if it had been copyrightable. - Jmabel ! talk 04:50, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. The logo is not below the threshold of originality (it is from UK, which has a very low threshold), but this is an old company and the logo may be in the public domain due to age. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:16, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:52, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation. I did a reverse image search on Google and found it was from the Orlando Police Department's Twitter account (https://x.com/orlandopolice) Gottagotospace (talk) 21:02, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- So the rationale is wrong, but isn't the state of Florida one of the few U.S. states where everything from government sources is public domain? - Jmabel ! talk 04:54, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- I don't know. The picture isn't being actively used anyway. The person who posted it kept trying to put a bunch of information about the guy in the picture on the English Wikipedia, but failed because of lack of individual notability of the subject. I don't really do anything on Wikimedia Commons (I mostly just do stuff on English Wikipedia) so apologies if I'm doing something wrong. Gottagotospace (talk) 04:55, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- If the issue is copyright status, "actively used" has absolutely nothing to do with the case. - Jmabel ! talk 17:50, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- I don't know. The picture isn't being actively used anyway. The person who posted it kept trying to put a bunch of information about the guy in the picture on the English Wikipedia, but failed because of lack of individual notability of the subject. I don't really do anything on Wikimedia Commons (I mostly just do stuff on English Wikipedia) so apologies if I'm doing something wrong. Gottagotospace (talk) 04:55, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Copyright status of works by the government of Florida. So if this comes from the Orlando Police Department, unless someone can demonstrate that some third party owns the copyright, that actually suggests that it is in the public domain, not that it is copyrighted. Keep unless such evidence is forthcoming. - Jmabel ! talk 17:53, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Of course, the license tag and source need to be changed accordingly, which I will do now. This upload seems to be User:Arcandkenlin's only contribution to Commons, and their only other edit on any project was to add this same image to en-wiki, so it doesn't seem worth engaging with the uploader. - Jmabel ! talk 17:56, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per Jmabel; PD-FLGov. Queen of Hearts (not related) 01:26, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:53, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work
Didym (talk) 22:11, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:53, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Courtesy deletion request by subject of photo - ticket:2024053110002331. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 11:04, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Used in d:Q18977917 which is in scope (linked from d:Q85815181. Also his photos are available in public, eg. here so I do not understand why should we delete this particular photo while having no replacement. Ankry (talk) 15:15, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete. This image is from the Craig Dillon wikipedia page which was previously deleted and salted due to biased editing and lack of notoriety. The image should be removed for the same reasons. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.103.65.154 (talk) 17:25, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment inclined to keep as it is in use at WD and for them it is in scope. Argument should be based on Commons:Photographs of identifiable people — billinghurst sDrewth 13:18, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:54, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Martin wolf (talk · contribs)
editDerivative works of non-free photographs, most findable on Google. An experienced uploader of many public domain works clearly knows the copyright of those isn't clear or they are too recent to be in public domain and added a filter to circumvent this.
examples – File:Hedvika Krejčová malířka a grafička.jpeg from here, File:František Malý malíř a grafik.jpeg from here, File:Karel Tondl.jpeg from here.
Zřejmá odvozená díla z fotografií z internetu, jejichž autorskoprávní ochrana není jasná protože nejsou dost stará aby se automaticky dala považovat za volná. Obejít to filtrem nestačí, nejde a je to podfuk.
- File:Hedvika Krejčová malířka a grafička.jpeg
- File:František Malý malíř a grafik.jpeg
- File:Josef Kočí, malíř.jpeg
- File:Milada Součková, spisovatelka.jpg
- File:Erich Hürden, malíř.jpg
- File:Josef Glückselig, malíř.jpg
- File:Jarmil Burghauser, hud. skladatel.jpg
- File:Karel Toman, malíř.jpeg
- File:Marie Rollerová-Kociánová.jpeg
- File:Hugo Traub.jpeg
- File:Jan Záhorský.jpeg
- File:Jindřich Černý.jpeg
- File:Zdeněk Tůma malíř.jpeg
- File:Josef Hofmann.jpeg
- File:Fritz Köllner.jpeg
- File:Jiřina Picková.jpeg
- File:Petr Hana.jpeg
- File:Karel Tondl.jpeg
- File:Josef Zamazal.jpeg
- File:Josef Schneiderka, malíř.jpeg
- File:Věra Junová, módní návrhářka.jpg
TFerenczy (talk) 17:58, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- ad File:Hedvika Krejčová malířka a grafička.jpeg – probably original photo is here: https://www.digitalniknihovna.cz/mzk/view/uuid:24b66b50-6d7a-11e4-85f4-5ef3fc9ae867?page=uuid:88d29540-6d9e-11e4-9d98-005056825209&fulltext="hedvika krejčová" (Mladý svět magazine, 39/1979, author: V. D. Franc) --Harold (talk) 11:11, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Martin wolf: Do you have any comment to add to this deletion request? — billinghurst sDrewth 13:32, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:54, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: what new could be added to existing collection of explicit materials? Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
- File:Meine Eichel.jpg deleted for low quality photo of very common object. Is File:Hornzipfel.jpg in scope for medical condition? No opinion on others. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:46, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 19:03, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Unremarkable COM:PENIS (well, sometimes butthole/cum) selfies, nothing we don’t already have.
- File:01 MyPee-hole.jpg
- File:01 MyLongForeskin.jpg
- File:01 MyMasturbation.jpg
- File:01 MyAnus.jpg
- File:01 MyDamm.jpg
- File:Dorsale Venen des Penis.jpg
- File:01 Rasiertes Schamhaar.jpg
- File:1 Rasiertes Schamhaar.jpg
- File:1 Penis mit zurückgezogener Vorhaut.jpg
- File:1 Vorhaut-Penis.jpg
- File:1 Auf den Bauch gespritzt.jpg
- File:Mann beim Onanieren.ogg
- File:1 Mann beim Pinkeln.jpg
- File:Penis-Eichel.jpg
- File:Nicht sonderlich ausgeprägtes Frenulum.jpg
- File:Before-and-after-shave.jpg
- File:Mein unrasierter Penis.jpg
- File:Unrasierter Penis.jpg
- File:Eichel mit Vorsaft.jpg
- File:Meine Hoden.jpg
- File:Schlaffer Hodensack.jpg
- File:Hodensack mit Naht.jpg
- File:Sperm-puddle.jpg
Dronebogus (talk) 22:44, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Delete since Commons isn't a porn host and these images have zero educational value. At least I assume they don't since I didn't look at them, but I think the titles alone are enough to determine they aren't educational. It's not like similar images aren't extremely easy to find in other places either. --Adamant1 (talk) 13:45, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:47, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
i believe user has good nudity images, im writing that because they are educational.
but that image is really out of project scope.
modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 18:08, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Only that one? Delete. 186.172.6.153 22:45, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Decent quality image, decent description and categories. If it’s part of a set of good images, then surely we should keep it. Brianjd (talk) 15:21, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 15:06, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
my own request as the creator 미솔파 (talk) 00:33, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- @미솔파: please address this against the criteria in com:deletion policy, the period of uploader is no longer pertinent. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:58, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:33, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
The center of the logo is a face of a girl, not a mere text, surpass the COM:TOO. Taichi (talk) 06:40, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- girl logo as COM:TOO Japan? メイド理世 (talk) 07:43, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Inclined to keep this after reading TOO Japan, the face is not overly designed or artistic. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:07, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:39, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
No indication of publication nor creation year. — Racconish 💬 07:15, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep This image comes from the Billy Rose Theatre Collection which consists of publicity images in circulation. I could see arguing that it remained out of circulation if it had a named photographer and the photographer, or their estate, deposited them in an archive. We have that situation with the Getty archive. United States copyright case law has declared that an image becomes public when it leaves the custody of the photographer. See the corresponding case law at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Minerva Kohlhepp Teichert 1908.jpg. Like every image prior to smartphones, dates are estimated by the birth and death years of the person in the image. There is also no copyright registration or copyright renewal for any image of Blyth Daly in either database. Copyright registration was required up to 1989. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk • contribs)
- We have no context here and in particular no indication the photograph was commissioned or intended for publication. — Racconish 💬 14:55, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Images rarely come with context, that is the nature of historical images. All evidence points to a three ring binder used by casting directors. This is a well worn positive print, not a negative sequestered in an archive and never printed. The negative is the original creative work, and every "perceivable copy" must comply with copyright formalities, if a copyright was ever intended. See for example: Category:Bain copyright notice for examples of compliance with copyright formalities. --RAN (talk) 16:27, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- We have no context here and in particular no indication the photograph was commissioned or intended for publication. — Racconish 💬 14:55, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:24, 20 August 2024 (UTC)