Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/07/25

Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Year	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2004	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2005	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2006	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2007	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2008	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2009	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2010	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2011	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2012	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2013	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12

Year	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2014	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2015	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2016	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2017	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2018	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2019	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2020	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2021	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2022	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2023	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2024	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12

Archive July 25^th, 2023

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tambourinehills.jpg

accidental upload JacobRadcliff (talk) 01:56, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:20, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Global map of fire alerts April 13, 2021 screen dump from Global Forest Watch website.png

Google Earth copyvio. Johnj1995 (talk) 04:24, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, obvious copyvio. --Rosenzweig τ 09:19, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Western Flycatcher 4790ma.jpg

speedydelete|<reason in prose> Vickie J Anderson 05:24, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:18, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Western Flycatcher 4755a.jpg

speedydelete|<reason in prose> Vickie J Anderson 05:25, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:18, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2023072302 Tichatscheckstrasse 22, Wuellnerstrasse 36a, 36 Eckansicht Baugeruest 2023.jpg

Qualitätsmängel VSchagow (talk) 07:04, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:17, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Administrator Power Travels to Ukraine - July 17-19, 2023 - 53066340426.jpg

Uploader request for speedy deletion. Thanks. Ooligan (talk) 07:16, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:16, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hggjfh.jpg

Out of scope * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 19:59, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Personal photo by non-contributor (F10). --Wutsje 23:27, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arabik4892 (talk · contribs)

Out of SCOPE: fantasy flags (per User:Arabik4892#Other_2)

Nutshinou ^Talk! 22:02, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wutsje 01:06, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Western Flycatcher 4797a.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Western_Flycatcher_4797a.jpg Vickie J Anderson 02:46, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Keep seems to be OK; if it is the incorrect file name you are worried about, it can easily be renamed; the best option would be File:Western Kingbird, [name of place where it was], Oregon 4797a.jpg - MPF (talk) 12:42, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:21, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:0002887-Injured-soldiers-defending-the-Bahmut-Front-01.jpg

Source states: “(c) Anadolu Agency via Getty Images”. RodRabelo7 (talk) 16:28, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, obvious copyvio. --Rosenzweig τ 07:27, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Synophalos diagram.png

I uploaded it by mistake Qohelet12 (talk) 19:54, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:25, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Administrator Power Travels to Ukraine - July 17-19, 2023 - 53066724695.jpg

Uploader speedy deletion request. Thanks. Ooligan (talk) 21:26, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:25, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chinedu echeruo image (8).jpg

Downloaded from google Ogalihillary (talk) 12:48, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: PCP. likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 08:46, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Peterclosek (talk · contribs)

Advertising, out of scope. And likely not own works: low-res/web-size images, small crops from unknown sources, missing EXIF data.

P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:24, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: all files already deleted by Wutsje. --Rosenzweig τ 10:53, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fuck spez.png

The file might not be considered de minimis, as it is the key/central part of the image. 2NumForIce (^speak|_edits) 00:00, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The giant text is "the key/central part of the image", not the artworks. They are either whited out where you can barely recognize them or out of focus. Nyescum (talk) 00:15, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Although some sub-images taken in isolation would not be de minimis (for example, the green and black figure in the bottom left and the Vietnam image tucked in the Z), the key part of the image is clearly the text, and the other images serve as little more than background noise/setting. On enwiki a version without the text exists under fair use, as the artworks are the central part of the image in that version, but the focus is clearly different here. Eiim (talk) 16:53, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If we are going to consider this minimis image, the others posted on the r/place page should also be considered 177.129.68.220 20:54, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep its about people placing one pixel at a time, not about any integral artwork. If users chose to collectively write ‘fuck spez’ in protest, and the article is about r/place, it should stay. Removing it is just revising history to fit someone who doesn’t like its narrative. Mghabmw (talk) 21:50, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep Looking at the De minimis guidelines the image seems to fall under #4. There is identifiable copyrighted work, but it is not the main subject of the image, and it is unavoidable. For example, if this image is considered de minimis, where the copyrighted material is much more clear and prominent, then surely this r/place image can be considered de minimis as well since it is not nearly as clear as the example I gave.Alin2808 (talk) 22:04, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The big text saying "fuck spez" is clearly the main part of the image, it is what is drawing attention. Everything else is de minimis. Matr1x-101 {user - talk? - useless contributions} 22:05, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This discussion may potentially face some indirect canvassing from Reddit. We should be aware of this going forward. Di (they-them) (talk) 23:33, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agree I think we should close this as quickly as possible, to avoid these kinds of false and negative posts to spread (hence why I changed my vote from keep to speedy keep). Alin2808 (talk) 23:39, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per others. White text is the only key/central part of the image. All other drawings are greatly obscured, have too much white color noise (as much as beyond recognition), and are pixelated. –Vipz (talk) 02:33, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I would probably pick a sample of the “fuck spez” timeline that is a tad bit more obscured. Keyword: “tad bit”. I still think it’s de minimis though. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 10:52, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Consensus is clear from the community that this image falls under de minimis. Closing this DR quickly due to concerns about some indirect canvassing from some Reddit threads (per Di (they-them) and Alin2808) (non-admin closure) Matr1x-101 {user - talk? - useless contributions} 11:03, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fuck spez.png

The amount of content here is overwhelmingly copyrighted; more importantly r/place is a single collaborative work so this is NOT de minimis because there whole thing is an artwork and the text is merely part of it Dronebogus (talk) 00:59, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep De minimis and COM:INUSE, per the previous deletion request thread. The copyrighted images are either too small to see well, or when viewed at full size, are deliberately pixellated with white spots. All of them are a background to the words. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:13, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment If there's issues with copyrighted things being shown, the solution would not be to delete it but to downscale it. However, I don't know about which license was given for the collaborative artwork...this isn't just text which would be de minimis...tend towards keep but it seems like people did not participate with the info that the result will be CCBY (maybe blurring the background would be something to consider).

Prototyperspective (talk) 13:45, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep We've had this discussion before, it is de minimis.

Alin2808 (talk) 11:49, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep No other argument, just the same thing the last nominator said. Nyescum (talk) 11:04, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I don't see any fresh arguments to delete apart from those from the previous DR. There is a decently overwhelming consensus that this is COM:DM so we're just doing the same thing over again in an unproductive way. S5A-0043^Talk 10:21, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I mostly see the image as "Hey, this is when the r/place contributors put a huge 'FUCK SPEZ!' text in the 2023 canvas as a form of protest to Reddit." Now sure, there's still a lot of copyrighted content, but I think most people will focus on the absolutely giant text. Even applies when you downscale it! I think that's what {{De minimis}} is, though.

Speedy keep. SergioFLS (talk) 23:01, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think what the focus of the image is is largely irrelevant in that regard: CCBY means people are also free to cut out images or icons that are anywhere within the image. The reason why it may still be de minimis is because all of those are low-res pixel-art and have lots of white dots in between. Prototyperspective (talk) 09:43, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"CCBY means people are also free to cut out images or icons that are anywhere within the image." Maybe it means that in general, but there is lots of precedent on this site for accepting panoramas on the basis that copyrighted buildings are de minimis in them but deleting cropped images of individual copyrighted buildings. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:49, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Either it's CCBY which means people are free to modify the image such as cropping things out or it isn't. It's not a what-I-wish-to-be-true thing. Prototyperspective (talk) 08:38, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Commons has been applying policy the way I stated. This seems like a larger policy discussion, so I would suggest for you to start a discussion at Commons talk:Deletion policy. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:23, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:50, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Brachy0008

I trust that these photos are uploaded in good faith, but unfortunately Roblox gameplay screenshots are copyrighted to the respective game creators. I suppose the Natural Disaster Survival pic can be reuploaded to Wikipedia locally for fair use if needed (though it may fail NFCC #8 but that's not the point of this DR right now). --SBS6577P (talk) 07:30, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for understanding, I tried doing Roblox screenshots so that I don’t have to upload copyrighted content like before. Brachy0008 (talk) 07:36, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you wanna help, here is a list of locations that needs photographing Trade (talk) 01:10, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: all files were already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 06:24, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mariehamn DGP -5 (51109836926).jpg

File:Mariehamn DGP.jpg Iketsi (talk) 11:26, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-preocessed. --Túrelio (talk) 08:13, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dihydroxyacetone acsv.svg

Duplicate of File:1,3-dihydroxypropan-2-one_200.svg, which has more complete metadata and greater cross-wiki usage. Alhadis (talk) 13:13, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. No need to keep this duplicate! — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 07:14, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 03:33, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:221 Fatty Acids Shapes-01.jpg

{{BadJPG}}, orphaned. Leyo 21:49, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 18:30, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 03:32, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:4-hex-5-enyl-1,2-dimethylbenzene.png

Poor quality (low resolution, pixelated), orphaned. Leyo 21:51, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. I have uploaded File:4-(Hex-5-en-1-yl)-1,2-dimethylbenzene-2D-skeletal.svg in case someone needs exactly this structure. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 18:39, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 03:32, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:4-phenylcoumarin.png

Poor quality, replaced by File:4-phenylcoumarin v2.svg. Leyo 21:53, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Also delete the file redirect File:4-phenylcoumarin.gif. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 18:45, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 03:31, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:CisTrans Palladium Complex.png

Replaced by File:CisTransPalladiumComplex.png that has a slighly higher resolution. Leyo 21:56, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. The unused file was replaced by a higher quality version. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 15:44, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 03:31, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cyclopentadiene 3 hydrogenated.jpg

Poor quality, incl. {{BadJPG}}; orphaned. Leyo 21:58, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 18:28, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 03:30, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cyclopentadiene 4 hydrogenated.jpg

Poor quality, incl. {{BadJPG}}; orphaned. Leyo 21:58, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 18:28, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 03:30, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tour Bretagne in Nantes.jpg

Copyvio. There is no commercial freedom of panorama in France. The tower was completed in 1976 and authored by architect Claude Devorsine. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:10, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:48, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:La Tour Bretagne à Nantes.jpg

Copyvio. There is no commercial freedom of panorama in France. The tower was completed in 1976 and authored by architect Claude Devorsine. The presence of the work is "intentionally included as an element of the setting." JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:12, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:28, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tour Bretagne.jpg

Copyvio. There is no commercial freedom of panorama in France. The tower was completed in 1976 and authored by architect Claude Devorsine. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:14, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:48, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tour-bretagne.jpg

Copyvio. There is no commercial freedom of panorama in France. The tower was completed in 1976 and authored by architect Claude Devorsine. The architectural work was "intentionally included as an element of the setting", failing COM:DM France. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:26, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:28, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nantes 2008 PD 61.JPG

Copyvio. There is no commercial freedom of panorama in France. The tower was completed in 1976 and authored by architect Claude Devorsine. The architectural work was "intentionally included as an element of the setting", failing COM:DM France. This is evidenced in its use as the infobox image for the enwiki article about the building itself. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:33, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:48, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tour Bretagne en fin de journee.jpg

Copyvio. There is no commercial freedom of panorama in France. The tower was completed in 1976 and authored by architect Claude Devorsine. The architectural work was "intentionally included as an element of the setting", failing COM:DM France. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:36, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:28, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tour-bretagne1.JPG

The Tour Bretagne may not be the main subject here, but the focus is on another copyrighted building. According to this site, the Post Office Building of Nantes dates to the 1980s. This means the designer/s of the building are not yet dead for more than 70 years for it to be in public domain. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:53, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:29, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Twin Tower (200885685).jpeg

Copyvio. There is no commercial freedom of panorama in France. The tower was completed in 1976 and authored by architect Claude Devorsine. The architectural work was "intentionally included as an element of the setting", failing COM:DM France. The part of the church here can be photographed without including the copyrighted tower, like this and this. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:59, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What tower, the left, the right one?

Seems not to be a copyright violation. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton^m 01:04, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Rodrigo.Argenton the left. By including it in the photo for comparison or photographic effect purpose, it fails COM:DM France as it is intentional. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:10, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Works without a particular or original character, which are a trivial reproduction of building types largely found across the country, are not protected. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton^m 02:18, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

-- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton^m 02:18, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Rodrigo.Argenton I don't think this is eligible for {{PD-structure|FRA}}. It is not part of a series of housing units with same building design, or an ordinary residence like a regular house. It is an office-type building made by a named architect, unlikely to be replicated across the country. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:47, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This seems to be a very regular/generic building for me.

-- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton^m 23:38, 26 July 2023 (UTC)=[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:48, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Penis11.jpg

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:12, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

11 mm? 11 ml? 11 mg? Borrar. 191.126.157.77 00:14, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete you can’t even see the subject! Dronebogus (talk) 18:29, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:49, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Penis11.jpg

Gentleman confused Commons with a porn site and added various images of his penis. I think this kind of "uploaders" (not users) should not be permitted to contribute here. 186.174.90.17 21:03, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: previously deleted under another name. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:27, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hoden11.jpg

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:12, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete blurry as hell Dronebogus (talk) 18:30, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:49, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Grand éléphant

Artistic creation without permission. See COM:DW.

Yann (talk) 20:02, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:11, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Grand éléphant

No permission from the work of art author, and no FoP in France.

Yann (talk) 21:57, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 01:10, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Grand éléphant

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in France.

A1Cafel (talk) 02:44, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:49, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Villa Cheminée

The artwork was completed in 2009 by Tatzu Nishi (1960–). There is no freedom of panorama in France, permission from the artist is required.

A1Cafel (talk) 02:52, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:49, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Arnastapi2Ice.JPG

No FoP in Iceland, artist Ragnar Kjartansson died in 1988 A1Cafel (talk) 02:59, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:29, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bardur snaefellsas.JPG

No FoP in Iceland, artist Ragnar Kjartansson died in 1988 A1Cafel (talk) 02:59, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:29, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jón "Nonni" Stefán Sveinsson - panoramio.jpg

No FoP in Iceland, artist Nína Sæmundsson died in 1965 A1Cafel (talk) 03:02, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:29, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Leifur Eiríksson (Leif Erikson).jpg

No FoP in Iceland, artist Nína Sæmundsson died in 1965 A1Cafel (talk) 03:03, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:29, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kskshsvaxwxvwjwhwv17.jpg

Out of scope personal photo * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:14, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:49, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:West Irian Liberation Monument

No FoP in Indonesia, artist Edhi Sunarso died in 2016

A1Cafel (talk) 03:17, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:50, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dirgantara.jpg

No FoP in Indonesia, artist Edhi Sunarso died in 2016 A1Cafel (talk) 03:18, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:29, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Guðríðr and Snorri statue - Glaumbær

No FoP in Iceland, artist Ásmundur Sveinsson died in 1982

A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:50, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Moonlight Shadow (3033780189).jpg

No freedom of panorama in Iceland A1Cafel (talk) 03:25, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:29, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Monument to Pushkin and Hannibal2.JPG

No FoP in Lithuania, artist Vytautas Nalivaika is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 03:27, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:29, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vilnius, Lithuania (27350716210).jpg

No FoP in Lithuania, artist Vytautas Nalivaika is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 03:27, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:29, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vilnius, Lithuania (27350720610).jpg

No FoP in Lithuania, artist Vytautas Nalivaika is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 03:28, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:29, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Gediminas Monument in Vilnius

There is no FOP in Lithuania.

russavia (talk) 09:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Deleting as part of upload cleanup russavia (talk) 09:11, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Gediminas Monument in Vilnius

The monument was compeleted in 1996 by Vytautas Kašuba (1915–1997). There is no freedom of panorama in Lithuania. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2068.

A1Cafel (talk) 03:33, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See comment below file list ... SM:!) (talk) 07:25, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's a pity there is not more focus by some on progressing Lithuania to allowing FOP so that the great work of the artists, sculptors and creators of the country can be more widely appreciated and presented to the rest of the world in essentially a non-commercial environment. It is relatively much easier to delete someone's work from this forum than to create it in the first place, and in some of the photos nominated the work in question (eg Vilnius Landmarks 103.jpg) is not the primary focus of the image or the work is essentially in shadow so not a challenge to artistic content. From past experience it is probably a forlorn hope but reconsideration of the images included in the above list would be welcomed, not only by the photographers but by those interested on selflessly promoting the work of Lithuanian artists. --SM:!) (talk) 07:23, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gediminas and historical flag of Lithuania.jpg the monument is visible in the right; and the historical flag is visible in the left. Does it copyrightable? TentingZones1 (talk) 04:58, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:50, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:IT Object next to the Estonian IT College.jpg

No freedom of panorama in Estonia A1Cafel (talk) 03:36, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:29, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Adult Swim mural

No FoP for 2D works in the United States

A1Cafel (talk) 03:45, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:50, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Square “Gateway to Latvia”.jpg

No freedom of panorama in Latvia A1Cafel (talk) 03:47, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:30, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ventspils, Latvia - panoramio (10).jpg

No freedom of panorama in Latvia A1Cafel (talk) 03:51, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:30, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Memoria e Luce

The memorial was completed in 2005 by Daniel Libeskind (1946–). There is no freedom of panorama in Italy, thus permission from his is required.

A1Cafel (talk) 05:04, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:51, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Waterfront Properties and Communities Logo.jpg

Dubious application of {{PD-textlogo}}. The design of the turtle looks complex enough to push this above the threshold of originality in the United States. ✗plicit 05:39, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:30, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nach dem Brand.jpg

Not looking like own photo, more likely a TV screenshot or other derivative, needs permission. A.Savin 08:59, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:30, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:John Redmon An American Recording Artist.jpg

No exif, same as his linkedin photo, needs OTRS Gbawden (talk) 13:04, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:31, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Steve Martin Gulf War USO Tour.jpg

Dubios claim of own work. Could be PD-US-GOV but need a source to confirm Gbawden (talk) 13:33, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:31, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Louvre Museum label

A bunch of Museum labels from the Louvre Museum, done by Onceinawhile. This stuff was temporarily useful to give a meaningful name to the related photographs, but they are Out of scope / Not educationally useful. Also some of them contain copyright violations of texts done by the Museum. Maybe we can keep the few well centrer and not blurry ones for Category:Museum labels in France but most of them where quickly done only to remember the subjects of related photographs done in the same day / same place. --Miniwark (talk) 13:23, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:52, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Teamfalcon3.png

Out of scope. Complex logo to boot. – Pbrks ^(t • c) 14:28, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:31, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Abulfaz Mammadov.jpg

Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:32, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:31, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Roommm.png

Unused isometric room drawing without clear purpose, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:35, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:31, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Doksuri 2023-07-25 0100Z.jpg

Question Were or are? RodRabelo7 (talk) 17:11, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:52, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Barbie dolls

See COM:VPC#Dimension of derivative works: photos of copyrighted toys are derivative works of the toys. This leaves only a few photos in the category which I believe are either de minimis or ineligible for copyright. Some of the photos are actually not toys but packaging with complex art.

Stefan4 (talk) 19:47, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

With reference to File:Early Barbie doll en suite 01.jpg and File:Early Barbie doll en suite 02.jpg (admittedly not among my better photos), and possibly some others here (I haven't looked through the batch) I would guess that the only elements here that were copyrighted and had their copyrights renewed are Barbie and Ken, who make up a pretty small portion of the pictures, albeit arguably constitute its main interest. But I'm not weighing in either way on the issue, you're welcome to delete these if people think it actually raises a copyright problem. - Jmabel ! talk 20:20, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- So dollhouses aren't copyrighted? In that case, those two pictures are probably fine. --Stefan4 (talk) 16:37, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- But note COM:FOP#United States: "The term building means structures that are habitable by humans and intended to be both permanent and stationary, such as houses and office buildings, and other permanent and stationary structures designed for human occupancy, including but not limited to churches, museums, gazebos, and garden pavilions." I'm not sure if a dollhouse is permanent, stationary or designed for human occupancy. --Stefan4 (talk) 20:27, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Searching all the copyright renewals would be a pain, but RE0000280638 and RE0000280637 are renewals for 1958 Barbies, which seem to protect all later Barbies.--Prosfilaes (talk) 01:41, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep File:Polaroid Barbie Pink Instant 600 Film Camera.jpg -- where do you see a "toy" or "complex art" there? Trycatch (talk) 16:19, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I think I must have ticked that checkbox by mistake. I don't see any problem with that photo. --Stefan4 (talk) 16:37, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- So you don't think the flower pattern sticker is copyrightable?--Prosfilaes (talk) 01:13, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep that one. De728631 (talk) 21:40, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep File:Dior New Look.jpg -- The appearance of the doll is totally unrelated to the purpouse of the photograph, which is to illustrate the New Look stetic trend created by Christian Dior in 1947. This is the only illustration of such work which appears in Wikipedia, thus this photograph existance is justified and required. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.164.52.50 (talk • contribs) 2012-02-19T18:54:30‎ (UTC)
- This is not Wikipedia and it still looks like a copyvio. --Stefan4 (talk) 19:03, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree with Stefan, delete that file. De728631 (talk) 21:40, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all but File:Polaroid Barbie Pink Instant 600 Film Camera.jpg. De728631 (talk) 21:40, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep all. --Guil2027 (talk) 00:19, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Why? --Stefan4 (talk) 00:30, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Why not? --Guil2027 (talk) 00:32, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete - there can be no question that dolls are protected by copyright under US law and that Barbie is covered by that. de minimis aside (eg a picture of a child's room or a shelf full or mixed toys) we can not keep any images of Barbie. --h-stt !? 11:07, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - indeed, these images constitute derivative works of copyrighted material. According to Commons:Derivative works, "action figures do not have utilitarian aspects and are therefore generally copyrighted as works of fine art." These images (barring the ones pointed out above) seem no exception. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 14:00, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
keep - I dont understand why you would want to delete these.(File:Barbie Fashion Model.JPG). It is not copyright violation if you use the image of an item that is copyrighted in a creative commons sense, especially if that image was taken by an individual (such as the one I quoted, which I took). Memory Alpha does that all the time with respect ot screen caps from various Star Trek shows/movies - which are all copyrighted materials. With that regard, you might as well then delete all pics on wikiepdia because what they photograph is copyrighted in one way or another. Image File:Barbie Fashion Model.JPG was modified by me in terms of how the doll's hair is done and how she is dressed. The original dolls wasn't even dressed like this or looked like this. By that account, every person who uploads a picture of a fashion doll on flickr, let's say, would be prohibited from doing so. And everyone taking a picture of a barbie they want to sell on ebay is also also violating copyright? SOFA and PIPA havent become laws yet. This just doesnt make sense. --CarrieBee (talk) 17:31, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, those people are violating copyright, unless it qualifies as fair use. However, Commons doesn't allow fair use. --Stefan4 (talk) 21:02, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all. The main problem I see here, and with these kind of multiple nominations, is that none of the pictures were taken by the same person in the same place. Multiple countries permit a total freedom of panorama—including 3D and 2D art, somes with the condition that should be taken in a public place (File:Sunning (2179966897).jpg), but public place is not necessarily a park or street; or even if the toy still copyrighted in the country of origin. If you want to delete them you have to investigate where they were taken, if the toy still copyrighted and then nominate them onr-by-one. Tbhotch™ 22:25, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Other example of what cannot be considered a copyvio or fair use is File:Study of a murder on a Barbie figurine.jpg, where the toy is not visible at all. Tbhotch™ 22:26, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

The sculpted details are.--Prosfilaes (talk) 23:23, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

With rare exception, countries with FOP only include permanently installed works. File:Sunning (2179966897).jpg was taken in Hawaii, and FOP doesn't apply at all for sculpture in the US.--Prosfilaes (talk) 23:23, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unless tagged with {{FoP-Israel}} or anything similar, I think that we have to assume that photos of dolls are unfree per COM:PRP. --Stefan4 (talk) 23:37, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unfortunately, I don't believe any of these images qualify for Commons (for reasons stated by others above). However, several of them would most definitely qualify as "fair-use" for use on Wikipedia. That being said, most of these aren't exactly "first-class" images and I believe most could easily be removed without much detriment to their respective articles (no offense to any of the photographers, but many appear rather "amateurish"). The remaining images that appear to be well-done could be reuploaded to their repsective Wikipedias with "fair-use" rationales (although I admit that will create a lot of "busy work" for the editors left to do the "clean-up"). I'm not a "professional" photographer, but I have access to a large assortment of Barbies (from various eras) and could easily take some nice professional looking photos to fill in some of the "gaps" that may result after the majority of less-than-steller images are removed. --- Crakkerjakk (talk) 11:44, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all, for the reasons that Tbhotch mentioned above. Acdx (talk) 12:12, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: It would appear that the copyright on Barbie dolls was renewed, making the vast majority of these non-free derivative works, which are strictly prohibited on Commons. There does seem to be consensus to keep File:Polaroid Barbie Pink Instant 600 Film Camera.jpg, so I've done that. FASTILY ^(TALK) 23:51, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Barbie dolls

See COM:TOYS.

Stefan4 (talk) 21:15, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:45, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Barbie dolls

Derivative works per COM:TOYS.

— Racconish ^💬 09:19, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. AshFriday (talk) 23:48, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 07:01, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Barbie dolls

Per COM:TOYS

— Racconish ^💬 09:48, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 05:20, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Barbie dolls

Copyrighted 3 dimensional figure, violation of COM:TOYS.

(Oinkers42) (talk) 15:32, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, the image is not a violation and is used as the lead image of a major article. Go rain on some other parade. Randy Kryn (talk) 22:52, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Randy Kryn, on what basis do these pass COM:TOYS? Why do you think it's at all relevant that it's currently in use? Cakelot1 (talk) 20:04, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Obviously fails COM:TOYS. As with all the previous DRs above, these are Derivative works of a copyrighted work. Cakelot1 (talk) 20:06, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:53, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Barbie dolls

Per COM:TOYS, Barbies are copyrighted by default. Excluding an advertisement that would need its own copyright notice and a few de minimis cases.

A few have tags indicating there was not copyright notice, but every box I've found from the relevant time period includes a copyright notice (for example [1] [2] [3]). It's hard to dig up the box for exact models, but the burden for that is likely on those claiming there was no copyright notice rather than the other way around.

Nominating photos from an exhibit in Italy, which does not have COM:FOP. Excluding museum exhibits in places with FOP (like those in Category:Barbie Expo), but I suspect those should be nominated, too, as temporary exhibitions rather than "permanent displays". Leaving those for someone else, though.

See also: the many other nominations on this page for the same reasons.

— Rhododendrites ^talk | 20:50, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per the nominator and past DRs where the same or similar images were deleted. Not to mention at least a few of these are questionably in scope to begin with anyway. --Adamant1 (talk) 20:55, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep File:Catwoman Barbie.jpg We have been through this before with sculptures of artworks. The image is okay in Australia due to it being a free country (ie one with FoP). It is CC in the US because I took the image and licensed it as such. WMF legal has fought and won cases on this basis before. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:06, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- FOP is typically just for things situated permanently in a particular location (The exception generally applies only to works on permanent public display.). The idea is to exempt things like buildings and major public art. I'd be surprised if Australia were different in that regard, but I'd be happy to be wrong. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 01:49, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- I've never heard about any WMF legal battles over FoP. If you cite the case, then we can be edified by the details, the arguments, and the resolution.--Prosfilaes (talk) 20:32, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both for the obvious reasons and because it would indirectly kill the ridiculous debate currently going on at w:talk:Barbenheimer Dronebogus (talk) 14:56, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In my experience, exporting disputes from enwp to Commons is unhelpful, and might even push annoyed Commons admins to lend more credibility to the other side. If you opt to remove that part of your comment, you're welcome to remove this response, too. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 15:49, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the image being used on Barbenheimer for page relevance and out-of-copyright information on the image page. Please do not remove the comment above (you can strike words out) as an example of bias pertaining to the RfC. Randy Kryn (talk) 05:36, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Randy Kryn, as you did in the last vote, you've used the argument that the image shouldn't be deleted because it's in use. But that's completely besides the point since we don't keep copyright violating works just because they are used. The argument is that the "out-of-copyright information" is incorrect, and you have not engaged with those arguments made in the nom. Cakelot1 (talk) 07:13, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per the well argued nom. It is possible that some of these are public domain but without evidence (and per COM:PRP) we can't keep them based on a possibility Cakelot1 (talk) 07:16, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

At least think out of the box and leave the image that's on the Barbenheimer page alone. You don't think if Mattel wanted it taken down they would have contacted someone? The page has had 1.4 million plus views since a photo of Barbie has been up-front, and of those views I would think that the Mattel company, its attorneys, its law clerks, its board of directors, and its secretaries would have clicked on the page and know that one of their dolls is being featured. They all know it, yet nobody got on the horn or filed a complaint. Mattel is perfectly happy having it up there! That's obvious, and because the copyright is still being questioned, and literally nobody cares to legally contest its use, at least leave it until this unique film-combination period moves along a bit and the page goes back to normal viewing. Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 22:27, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- "Nobody has complained yet" isn't a reason for keeping anything. Images on Commons must be usable and modifiable by anyone for any purpose. Our policies are in place to protect not just Wikipedia, but everyone who uses the content. If someone would be opening themselves up to litigation by taking our Barbie photos, putting them in a book or on a poster, and selling them, we cannot host it. People need to know when they go to Commons that the license is reliable. "But it's used in an article" is irrelevant. If you would like it to be used in an article and not hosted on Commons, that's what en:WP:NFCC is for (for local uploads to Wikipedia). There's probably a good case for NFCC when it comes to the main Barbie article. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:51, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That makes sense. Would you or someone please add the Vintage Barbie 2 cropped to the Wikipedia files (The one being used on Barhenheimer now)? I'm not computer savvy enough to add it and yes, the Barbie page could argue for it for sure and the Barbenheimer page could have a good case. Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 03:06, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't there's much chance you'd get an WP:NFCC Rationale for the Barhenheimer page. As to the main Barbie page Wikipedia would probably want a clearer and up to date image than "Vintage Barbie". Best to leave it until/if this deletion happens. Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 07:07, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

^^ If you're going the en:WP:NFCC route, you can pick an ideal photo (like one from an official Mattel website, even), then just upload it locally to wikipedia and follow the prompts to explain why it qualifies for NFCC. Actually, it looks like the main Barbie article already has a couple non-free images: en:File:MattelBarbieno1br.jpg and en:File:Oreo Fun Barbie.jpg. If you wanted to upload another one, you could use the templates on those pages as a template. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:31, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can't do uploads on my computer, which is why I asked. The image used on Barbenheimer fits that page well and serves as a counterpoint to an image of Oppenheimer within a double-image. The reasoning for its use at Barbenheimer would be as representative of the portrayed character per the use of the Oppenheimer image. Randy Kryn (talk) 13:43, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Randy Kryn, it "fitting" or looking good isn't enough to get for WP:NFCC unfortunately. Even in the main barbie article I can't think of any non-free justification (the section doesn't say anything about the barbie in question). representative of the portrayed character, simply isn't a strong enough reason. And non of this is a reason for keeping it on commons, which is what we are discussing here. (I have the original flikr upload bookmarked so if there is suddenly an extremely good WP:NFC based reason I can always upload it to wp, although this sort of discussion should really be happening at w:Talk:Barbenheimer) Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 22:18, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment FYI, this and this. Nyxaros (talk) 20:10, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As the nom noted there doesn't seem to be any evidence of Pd-no-notice, and non was provided in those DRs. The user asserting no-notice doesn't seem to be the photographer so it doesn't seem wise to take that without evidence. Mdaniels5757 (and the closer IronGargoyle), if there's some obvious evidence of there not being a copyright notice on this particular barbie (when others at the time had them), it would be much appreciated if you could point it out. Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 09:33, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom, we'd need evidence of no copyright notice on the original boxes to justify keeping the images. Di (they-them) (talk) 23:55, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Barbie on a black cross as transformative and de minimis. The rest are probably unjustifiable, unfortunately. David Eppstein (talk) 20:39, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, but whether it's transformative is a consideration of fair use, which Commons doesn't accept, and the doll is the focal point (and title) of the image. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:50, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I already nominated one of the files for deletion here Commons:Deletion requests/File:Black Barbie from 1980 in the box.jpg. Should I request that DR to be closed for this one? (Oinkers42) (talk) 15:14, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:26, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by VladoubidoOo (talk · contribs)

Edelseider (talk) 19:02, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Yes, "Source: Google" is dubious, but the images seem to be properly attributed to painters who have died long ago. So the images are all PD. As per official Commons Rule, a 2D reproduction of a PD painting does not add a new copyright, so it doesn't matter whether the uploader scanned the file themselves or took them from somewhere on the internet. PaterMcFly (talk) 12:34, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@PaterMcFly: there is no problem with the copyrights (although some paintings are shown with their frame, which makes these images non-PD). The problem is that the "somewhere on the internet" that you so rightly mention is not indicated. Google is just the search engine that was used to find these pictures on several different sites. Which sites? We aren't told, and that's the problem. --Edelseider (talk) 14:09, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So the problem is that we cannot verify the author without a source? I agree, that should be improved, but if we have no copyright issue, we shouldn't delete the images but take the time to fix that. Some of the images are even in use, so we can assume that the painters are properly attributed. All images seem to have the collection/museum where the original is in the description, so this should technically be sufficient to verify the PD status. PaterMcFly (talk) 14:43, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Of course, I vote to keep all these images on Commons. For each file, I have always indicated the name of the author of the painting (according to the most recent published research), and the place of location. I have always categorized all of these files (exept perhaps a few oversights, my apologies) with the category of the artist concerned. I recognize that I should also have included the categories related to the subject (iconography) and the place of conservation, but this information can be completed. Regarding the source of the file, it seems to me that these works are in the public domain (as the faithful reproduction of a work in two dimensions, and whose author died more than 70 years ago) and that the information on the source (website...) can be added, without it being necessary to delete the files and thus destroy several years of work.

--VladoubidoOo (talk) 15:49, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per PaterMcFly. All these images need is someone to go through, however painfully, and add sources. I've already tried to provide a source for File:Cazes Christ guérissant l'hémorroïsse Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris.jpg. It'll just take some time.

BusterTheMighty (talk) 05:12, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep No copyright issue. All are in the PD. -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 09:12, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@VladoubidoOo: well yes, of course, you have several days to correctly fill the Source field with the link to the page from where you downloaded each image before uploading it here. It's not like there will be a mass deletion in a few hours. But you cannot keep "Source = Google", because the next stage would be "Author = paintbrush".--Edelseider (talk) 17:34, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Edelseider: of course, and I agree. However, I need to be sure that the files will not be deleted in seven days by a bot, as the banner that has been integrated on each of them suggests (having a job outside of my activity here, I won't have time to correct all the sources of the files by then). I will be able to make these corrections as I go, over the next few weeks, but it will take time. --VladoubidoOo (talk) 21:28, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A deletion discussion (such as this one) is never closed by a bot, only manually by an administrator. They can leave the thread open for much longer than 7 days if there's no clear consensus nor any obvious reason for deletion. So take your time. PaterMcFly (talk) 06:16, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Also Speedy or Regular-Deletion nomination, not both. If someone removes the speedy, you are not supposed to restore it. --RAN (talk) 04:03, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per PaterMcFly. No apparent copyright problems. Yes the source is, well, yes, but the photos are PD in the first place. We can always add the source back in, though this may take a while since, well, so many files are listed. S5A-0043^Talk 11:22, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 04:53, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Uschi Werner Fluss für Wikipedia pdf.pdf

Out of scope: plain text content. If you are trying to add an article to the German Wikipedia, please read de:Hilfe:Neuen Artikel anlegen; you cannot create an article by uploading a PDF document. Omphalographer (talk) 20:01, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:54, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hexadecatrienoic acid.png

Low quality; orphaned. Leyo 22:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:31, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

TimedText:Play fight between cats.webmhd.webm.en.srt

These auto-generated subtitle are inaccurate; this video doesn't have any parts that can be subtitled. FunLater (talk) 00:19, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 07:33, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:من مقر العمل والتصوير 2 مقر العمل والتصوير الفديوهات.jpg

Out of scope * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:20, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 07:32, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:من مقر العمل والتصوير الفديوهات الجديده والأفكار المدبعه من 2مقر.jpg

Out of scope * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:38, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 07:32, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo fa.jpg

"Sourge: Google" and "Author: I don't know" offers very little evidence that this logo is anything but copyrighted Unknown Temptation (talk) 11:37, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Rosenzweig τ 07:06, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Drapeau du Nigeria.png

Duplicate of File:Flag of Nigeria.svg. Fry1989 ^eh? 19:13, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:58, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flaga Australia.png

Duplicate of File:Wayne Stokes Proposal for Australia.svg. Fry1989 ^eh? 19:14, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:58, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flag of Nyasaland (1919-1953, 1963-1964).svg

There were two versions of the flag of Nyasaland, one with a black chief and one with a green one. The blue chief is inaccurate. Fry1989 ^eh? 19:20, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:58, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Corrected-TLP-5.0-legal-provsions.pdf

Out of scope * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 19:57, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Copy of https://trustee.ietf.org/wp-content/uploads/Corrected-TLP-5.0-legal-provsions.pdf with inexplicable annotations on the first and last pages. Omphalographer (talk) 22:05, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:57, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:گروه روشن و دارینه.png

Unused diagram with no context, out of scope * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 20:02, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:55, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lógica de Predicados practica.pdf

Out of scope * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 20:06, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:54, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:January 2023 Muni Metro map.jpg

PNG version File:Muni Metro map (2023-01-07).png is superior (higher resolution and without compression artifacts). JPG format itself is poorly suited to diagrams & maps due to compression. All global uses have been migrated to the PNG version. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 23:25, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader concurs with deletion. -- RickyCourtney (talk) 23:31, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:53, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Union sportive Quevilly-Rouen Métropole.png

The link given by the uploader does not mention any Creative Commons licence. The club - the creator of the logo - has fully copyrighted their website, and the image uploaded to French Wikipedia is copyrighted. Unknown Temptation (talk) 11:13, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I actually approve this Deletion request, BUT if only the picture of the French Wikipedia is also copyrighted. Gabrylboy (talk) 11:40, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Some wikis (thereamong English and French Wikipedia) allow the uploads of non-free/copyrighted files under fair use legislation. Commons however does not! All works on Commons must be licensed with at least one free license in both the USA and the source country, if other than the USA. Jonteemil (talk) 07:47, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete Blatant copyvio. Jonteemil (talk) 07:45, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files by MyBidz

Out of scope; pointless cropped images made by a globally locked troll accounts. File:Item at Stavernfestivalen.jpg, which was uploaded by YourBidz, was previously nominated for speedy deletion using this reasoning before being reverted by MyBidz. --reppop^talk 05:19, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ah yes i also wanted to start a request on this. definitely support a deletion of these files --FMSky (talk) 18:30, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Kritzolina (talk) 16:58, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Biswavaryossum.jpg

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 14:02, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Kritzolina (talk) 17:01, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MastAdmi.png

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 14:03, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Kritzolina (talk) 17:02, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Saudi vision 2030 pic.jpg

The source site is copyrighted, not "creative commons". Wyslijp16 (talk) 16:11, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Kritzolina (talk) 17:03, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mihalıççık ozanı.jpg

Unused personal photo, no metadata, out of project Zafer (talk) 17:16, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Kritzolina (talk) 17:04, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Besekler.jpg

Unused photo, no metadata, out of project Zafer (talk) 17:17, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, also extremely low quality. --Kritzolina (talk) 17:04, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:U.S. Concarneau Logo.svg

As if it wasn't obvious enough already, even the link given by the uploader to French Wikipedia says that this image is copyrighted and should not be transferred to Commons. Unknown Temptation (talk) 11:10, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy. --Rosenzweig τ 13:00, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Propaganda del PP en la campaña para las elecciones generales de 2023.jpg

Probably it's copyrighted by Partido Popular and not by the uploader user. Sebasweee (talk) 12:01, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's an add posted in the street for its whole lifetime. Doesn't that qualify for FOP-Spain according to Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Permanent_vs_temporary?--Pere prlpz (talk) 19:58, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

When I wrote it, I didn't think in FoP and if it works for it, it would also work for other copyrighted images that are temporarily in the street like movie posters. And I think it wasn't placed in the street for it's lifetime, only for the two weeks of election campaign. --Sebasweee (talk) 11:16, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just to avoid copy-pasting two identical discussion for two images in nearly identical situation, I answered in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Propaganda de Sumar en la campaña para las elecciones generales de 2023.jpg.--Pere prlpz (talk) 15:21, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I answered in the other deletion request, I will stop answering here, all what I say there also works here.--Sebasweee (talk) 16:05, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 13:00, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Couronne de François Ier.png

Useless. No potential educative use. 2A01:CB00:D26:F600:295F:2440:5B7E:18B 00:59, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 09:52, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Le centre Georges Pompidou (Paris) (8191200447).jpg

This file were put in Category:French FOP cases/pending, with the edit summary No FoP in France.. It depicts the indoor of the Centre Pompidou, with a art contemporain plane inside. Dereckson (talk) 23:11, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Deleting as part of cleanup russavia (talk) 23:13, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Le centre Georges Pompidou (Paris) (8191200447).jpg

Likely a reupload of the same Flickr import deleted through Commons:Deletion requests/File:Le centre Georges Pompidou (Paris) (8191200447).jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:01, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:53, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Izzle Payo.jpg

Self promotion. Jorge Barrios (talk) 01:43, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Unused personal photo, out of scope/F10. --Wdwd (talk) 10:34, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Statue of Olafur Thors, Iceland in April 2016 14.JPG

No FoP in Iceland, artist Sigurjón Ólafsson died in 1982 A1Cafel (talk) 03:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I did not realize. Geraldshields11 (talk) 15:32, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:37, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bahaa12345.jpg

Out of scope personal photo * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:39, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Platform 4 and 5 of Shanghai Hongqiao Railway Station 2020091402.jpg

duplicate of Windmemories (talk) 03:01, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:41, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Martin naseri.jpg

Out of scope personal photo * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:13, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:09, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: file is in use. --Wdwd (talk) 10:43, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lisanslı.jpg

Out of scope * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:16, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:43, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Banu al ameri (talk · contribs)

Out of scope personal photos

* Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:24, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:46, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Joel Humberto S.jpg

copyright violation, not an own work PizzaKing13 (talk) 04:16, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:50, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Doctor Jose Renderos.png

copyright violation, not an own work PizzaKing13 (talk) 04:16, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:52, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ingeniero Lito Montalvo.png

copyright violation, not an own work PizzaKing13 (talk) 04:16, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:52, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hilcia Bonilla ViceArena.jpg

copyright violation, not an own work PizzaKing13 (talk) 04:16, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:52, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Quinn cordes - oprichter van De bloemenjongen.jpg

no author not a selfie as claimed (see both hands), out of project scope - non encyclopedically relevant person, privacy issues Hoyanova (talk) 05:08, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:57, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:StagePool - Renato Salvi - Foto Mimmo Russo - 2018.jpg

Own work? What else?! 186.174.90.76 06:10, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 10:59, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Karte der Vogesen im Massstabe 1-50 000. Blatt VI und VII, Niederbronn - Wörth - herausgegeben vom Central-Ausschuss des Vogesen-Clubs - gbearbeitet im kartographischen Institut von Carl Flemming - btv1b10111235t (1 of 2).jpg

Duplicate of File:Karte der Vogesen im Massstabe 1-50 000. Blatt VI und VII, Niederbronn - Wörth - herausgegeben vom Central-Ausschuss des Vogesen-Clubs$gbearbeitet im kartographischen Institut von Carl Flemming - btv1b10111235t (1 of 2).jpg. Gzen92 (talk) 07:06, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: File page with no file uploaded/F7. --Wdwd (talk) 11:04, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Karte der Vogesen im Massstabe 1-50 000. Blatt VI und VII, Niederbronn - Wörth - herausgegeben vom Central-Ausschuss des Vogesen-Clubs - gbearbeitet im kartographischen Institut von Carl Flemming - btv1b10111235t (2 of 2).jpg

Duplicate of File:Karte der Vogesen im Massstabe 1-50 000. Blatt VI und VII, Niederbronn - Wörth - herausgegeben vom Central-Ausschuss des Vogesen-Clubs$gbearbeitet im kartographischen Institut von Carl Flemming - btv1b10111235t (2 of 2).jpg. Gzen92 (talk) 07:06, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: File page with no file uploaded/F7. --Wdwd (talk) 11:06, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Second Cold War alliances.svg

Author request: the file is unused, and it's really just my speculation. I request https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Second_Cold_War_alliances_(political).svg be deleted for the same reason. Discombobulates (talk) 07:43, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm withdrawing this. Discombobulates (talk) 11:43, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: DR withdrawn. --Wdwd (talk) 11:07, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Second Cold War alliances.svg

I created this file and believe it should be deleted because I'm not updating it, and the premise of depicting what I want to depict in just this one file is not very realistic Discombobulates (talk) 18:37, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, being used. 186.175.167.213 03:09, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it isn't. If you check the usage section, you'll see it's not. It was on Wikidata I think before but someone seems to have removed it. Discombobulates (talk) 17:28, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unused, request from creator. PARAKANYAA (talk) 21:08, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:35, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Second Cold War alliances (political).svg

Author request: the file is unused, and it's really just my speculation. I request https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Second_Cold_War_alliances.svg be deleted for the same reason. Discombobulates (talk) 07:43, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm withdrawing this. Discombobulates (talk) 11:43, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: DR withdrawn. --Wdwd (talk) 11:08, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Second Cold War alliances (political).svg

I created this file and believe it should be deleted because I'm not updating it, and the premise of depicting what I want to depict in just this one file is not very realistic Discombobulates (talk) 18:36, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you going to withdraw your request again? 186.175.167.213 03:10, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No. I did last time because it wasn't actually deleted after I requested it and I didn't want someone to stumble up the request months later and delete it (because I might have actually wanted to update it again then). Discombobulates (talk) 17:29, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unused, request from creator. Point about one file depicting that is fair. PARAKANYAA (talk) 21:08, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:34, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ibrahim Rowther.jpg

Not own work. The image already found at https://www.instanews.city/cinema/ibrahim-ravuthar-is-the-one-planted-milestones-in-vijaykanths-screen-path-958623 ~AntanO4task (talk) 08:02, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:09, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Essen11.jpg

Not educationally useful 888mxmx (talk) 08:10, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On hold It would be helpful if someone can identify this food. Lukas Beck (talk) 09:25, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content/G7. --Wdwd (talk) 11:11, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ergoldsbach 1.jpg

Not educationally useful Marchuk17 (talk) 08:18, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The picture may be educationally usefull, but I see an other controverse here. We have this picture, most likely taken from the same spot with a at least very similar sky. But these two images came from different users. And we don't have any metadatas in each case. At least questionable, i think! --Lukas Beck (talk) 09:23, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: not a recent upload, imo in scope. --Wdwd (talk) 11:13, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ergoldsbach 1.jpg

Not educationally useful. Private photo. It's not suitable for illustrating the sky. Ergoldsbach is far away and almost invisable. Marchuk17 (talk) 20:04, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Completely usable. If you think the description or title should be changed for greater accuracy, please do so. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:26, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Already kept one mounth ago. The doubts I expressed back then are still valid. But the decision was made to keep it and within a month little had changed. Lukas Beck (talk) 04:07, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:46, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ergoldsbach 1.jpg

Photo are basically identical https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ergoldsbach_0002.jpg Marchuk17 (talk) 20:10, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Similar image but different angle and color tones. Not really a valid reason for deletion. —Tcr25 (talk) 20:16, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

COM:Redundant. Crazyheart1 (talk) 20:29, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I think it would be appropriate to grant the deletion request at this point. The garden looks like private property to me. I think that the user basically has a good reason for not wanting this property, which really has no purpose for us, to be published here, regardless of why the image was uploaded in the first place. I think the alternative image would be a fair compensation. I mean, does it really depend on the color of the sky? I think we should delete the image for the benefit of the person who uploaded it. --Lukas Beck (talk) 20:50, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep per previous DRs, and not close to identical. Also, giving up to people who make repeated ill-founded deletion requests is a very bad practice, because it encourages them. Finally, I don't think it's up to you to presume that this photo " has no purpose for us." I think you mean no purpose for you. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:17, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:05, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ergoldsbach 1.jpg

COM:FOP Germany. The photo does not fall under the freedom of panorama, as it is a publicly closed place (fenced garden of a private house). A photo of a publicly closed place taken from inside a publicly closed place. Marchuk17 (talk) 12:46, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The photograph does not show anything copyrightable IMO, so freedom of panorama is irrelevant. --Rosenzweig τ 20:06, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 08:13, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ger.svg

This file was initially tagged by Johnj1995 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G2. Original uploader is GTRus and redirect creator is Tohaomg, so the redirect does not qualify for speedy deletion and I allow a regular deletion request. Taivo (talk) 08:44, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, this file has been initially tagged as speedy by me, and I repeat the reason: G2 and "file name and its meaning has nothing to do with the redirect target file". Or please tell me, what is "Ger" and what has this to do with the target file? – Doc Taxon • Talk • 13:26, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Unused and implausible redirect/G2. --Wdwd (talk) 11:16, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kit left arm ulsanhfc23h.png

Same picture exists. ulsan23h.pngv Methewle (talk) 15:22, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use. Use {{Duplicate}} instead. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 07:45, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kit left arm ulsanhfc23h.png

The same file exists. Methewle (talk) 09:16, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion (missing duplicate file name). --Wdwd (talk) 11:19, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kit body ulsanhfc23h.png

Same picture exists. ulsan23h.png Methewle (talk) 15:23, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use. Use {{Duplicate}} instead. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 07:45, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kit body ulsanhfc23h.png

The same file exists.ulsan23h Methewle (talk) 09:17, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion (missing duplicate file name). --Wdwd (talk) 11:20, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hôtel international.jpg

Picture from a personnal collection which does not look like to be free (https://www.communes.com/cartes-postales-anciennes-vichy) Intemperie07 (talk) 10:03, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is a postcard from 1905. Selling a picture as a postcard is considered publication. Herbert Ortner (talk) 06:49, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as PD-anon-expired. --Wdwd (talk) 11:22, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo QKFC (depuis 2022).png

The credited website, belonging to the football club, has "touts droits réservés" (all rights reserved) in the bottom text. That's about as clear as you can get. Unknown Temptation (talk) 11:20, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 11:23, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Propaganda de Sumar en la campaña para las elecciones generales de 2023.jpg

Probably it is copyrighted by Sumar and not by the uploader user. Sebasweee (talk) 11:51, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's an add posted in the street for its whole lifetime. Doesn't that qualify for FOP-Spain according to Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Permanent_vs_temporary?--Pere prlpz (talk) 19:57, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

When I wrote it, I didn't think in FoP and if it works for it, it would also work for other copyrighted images that are temporarily in the street like movie posters. And I think it wasn't placed in the street for it's lifetime, only for the two weeks of election campaign. --Sebasweee (talk) 11:16, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the intended lifetime of election posters is the election campaign or less, since they are glued somewhere and removed or covered by other posters at the end of the campaign or even before. In fact, this one had already started being covered by an unrelated poster by the time the photo was taken, despite of being uploaded before the election actually took place.--Pere prlpz (talk) 15:18, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If FOP can be used here and in the photo of the other deletion request, maybe adding Template:FoP-Spain will be enough. I added this deletion request and the other one because I wasn't sure that these two photos where allowed here.--Sebasweee (talk) 16:04, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: COM:POSTER. --Wdwd (talk) 11:55, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Papeleta SUMAR Generales 2023 (sin logo).svg

This photo, which works as a logo, isn't simple enought for being a "text logo" or "simple geometry", the link doesn't say anything about if it's copyrighted or not Sebasweee (talk) 11:52, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Sebasweee I understand that may not be the correct Copyright cathegory. In any case, this electoral symbol made by Sumar is based on the file Yolanda Díaz en reunión.jpg which is copyrighted as cc-by-sa-4.0. Also I want to also discuss the file Papeleta SUMAR Generales 2023 (con logo).svg which is a combination of the file we are discussing and Sumar_logo.svg which is indeed a "text logo". I'm open to change the Copyright cathegory to be correct, as I may did a mistake labelling it, but for me it is a free use file. - AytoEru (talk) 12:12, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@AytoEru, the photo Yolanda Díaz en reunión.jpg is on Yolanda's Twitter and there isn't any information about the creative commons license.--Sebasweee (talk) 13:27, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Sebasweee even if the photo Yolanda Díaz en reunión.jpg is uploaded in Yolanda Diaz's Twitter, the file in Wikimedia its licensed as cc-by-sa-4.0 and labelled as own work by its author @AntonMST29. This photo has been in use in Wikimedia since 2021.

In any case, we are discussing Papeleta SUMAR Generales 2023 (sin logo).svg and it is a derived work from a CC photo so, there's no doubt about its free use. I am going to procede to change the information in Papeleta SUMAR Generales 2023 (sin logo).svg to add that it is a derived work. Please, considers this as an evidence of its free use. - AytoEru (talk) 13:39, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Sebasweee now, Papeleta SUMAR Generales 2023 (sin logo).svg is clearly copyrighted as cc-by-sa-4.0 and in the author section is clearly identified that it is own work derived from a cc-by-sa-4.0 photo, so no doubt is remaining in its free use. - AytoEru (talk) 13:44, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@AytoEru, I'm not sure of it, but if it's correct, we can continue with the cc-by-sa-4.0 license.--Sebasweee (talk) 17:56, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Sebasweee all right. I'm going to proceed to delete the deletion request template. Thanks. - AytoEru (talk) 21:50, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Wdwd (talk) 11:59, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Uche Ekwensu.jpg

Downloaded photo, copyright Ogalihillary (talk) 12:07, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:01, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Uche Obi osotule new photos.jpg

Downloaded from google Ogalihillary (talk) 12:47, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:02, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Uche okeke.jpg

Downloaded from google Ogalihillary (talk) 12:47, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:02, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:DA martin louise 1B4 3a 465564 thumbnail.jpg

Downloaded from google Ogalihillary (talk) 12:47, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:03, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chinedu Sunday Chukwu download (1).jpg

Downloaded from google Ogalihillary (talk) 12:49, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:03, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mohammed Mana.jpg

Downloaded from google Ogalihillary (talk) 12:50, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:03, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mohammed Salam Rahama.png

Downloaded from google Ogalihillary (talk) 12:51, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:04, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mohammed Adamu.jpg

Downloaded from google Ogalihillary (talk) 12:52, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:04, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mohammed-Sani-Saleh.jpg

Downloaded from google Ogalihillary (talk) 12:52, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:04, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MohammedAliSoulah.jpg

Downloaded from google Ogalihillary (talk) 12:52, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:05, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MohammedAbbaGana.jpg

Downloaded from google Ogalihillary (talk) 12:53, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:05, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mercychinwo.jpg

Downloaded from google Ogalihillary (talk) 12:53, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:05, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Elizabeth Balogun.jpg

Downloaded from google Ogalihillary (talk) 12:54, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:06, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hossein Sadri.png

Downloaded from google Ogalihillary (talk) 12:55, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:06, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:GARBA-ADAMU-8.jpg

Downloaded from google Ogalihillary (talk) 12:55, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:07, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Elikoski (talk · contribs)

Both files were cross-wiki uploaded as "own work", but both have watermarks with different photographers named. Therefore they're not "own work" and there's no proof that they are freely licensed.

kyykaarme (talk) 13:28, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:11, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kalinalinkalina (talk · contribs)

Credited to a visualization lab, they need a source to confirm license or OTRS to keep - own work they are not

Gbawden (talk) 13:41, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 12:13, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wiltrud Hackl Kepler Salon 2018 01-2.jpg

wikimedia uses this photo without my permission, it is not authorized by me, the subject presented here. the photo is not contextualized with any information about me, so I wonder why it is shown here anyway. i am not a public person or a person of interest for other people, i do not have a wikipedia entry. please delete it. it is really upsetting - the photographer knows me, he has my email address - why didnt he ask me before using it? how disrespectful this is! 81.10.147.125 14:48, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am the creator of the photo, which was taken during an official event as part of the Crossing Europe Film Festival in Linz. Crossing Europe issued me with an official press accreditation. However, if the person depicted wishes the photo to be deleted, I will not vote against it. Dromedar61 (talk) 14:58, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per @Dromedar61, per courtesy, and per Commons:Scope. There is no article about the depicted person which that photo might illustrate. – Furthermore, I can confirm that the depicted person requested a deletion of the image per Ticket:2023072510006856. Mussklprozz (talk) 18:36, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This image is used by Wikidata and also by various missing articles lists in several Wikipedia language versions, suggesting that it is NOT out of scope. --Rosenzweig τ 07:03, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: courtesy deletion, personality rights. --Wdwd (talk) 12:28, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Zhujiang beer.jpg

No evidence that the photographer is the copyright owner of the image(s) on the package(s).
(Derivative work of copyrighted image/artwork.)
If the images on the package is PD for any reason (like age or shape), that should be specified by using e.g. {{Licensed-PD}}. (However, the design of the bottle might be simple, the photo used of the bottle on the packaging is not simple).
--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 15:02, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: COM:PACKAGING. --Wdwd (talk) 12:30, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Azərbaycan.jpg

Low-quality picture of one of the most fotographed place in Baku, the Boulevard. There is no educational value and there are many alternative images to this NMW03 (talk) 15:27, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion ( no alternatives/examples given). --Wdwd (talk) 12:35, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hockey Hall of Fame de Toronto - NHL Slapshot para Nintendo Wii.jpg

This file was initially tagged by (Oinkers42) as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted video game box art, clearly not COM:De minimis.

Converting to DR since the photograph is freely licensed and the issue is of COM:DW. Abzeronow (talk) 15:30, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, COM:PACKAGING. --Wdwd (talk) 12:34, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Elvis by Brian Wellman

Derivative work of a modern-looking painting. I found it impossible to find information on the artist and therefore impossible to confirm whether pictures of the painting are acceptable on Commons. --Cryptic-waveform (talk) 15:28, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Wellman was a notable abstract painter in acrylics in london in the 90's and 2000's. Of course it's derivitive, it derived from the image of Elvis and makes fun of his gold lame suit. There are no other paintings I have seen that look like this sillouette. It was a humerous part of the road trip to have "Elvis" visit places along I 75. Most of you in USA know little or nothing about canadians. I have seen well known writers etc, deleted from here because some (####) in the US hadn't heard of them. His father was dieing in the mid 2000's and he left London to care for him. He had displays with gallery shows with the London new Arts Festival and The London Arts council. Keep. Photo Archives (talk) 16:59, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The issue here is not notability, it's copyright. See Commons:Licensing#Derivative works. Did Brian Wellman agree to license his painting under cc-by-sa-4.0? If not then these pictures can only be hosted on Commons until he agrees to do so or until the painting enters the public domain.

Also no need to insult other contributors, even if you censor yourself. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 16:42, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; Missing permission for shown artworks. --Wdwd (talk) 12:37, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kadiatou Kaba RTG 04.jpg

un doublon Aboubacarkhoraa (talk) 15:42, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: duplicated file already processed, see log. --Wdwd (talk) 12:41, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Night-for-the-blood.png

Possible copyvio: Billboard for concerts CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:22, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:42, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wout Van Aert (2017-02-01) - World Champion.jpg

Unlikely own work, as this is a professional image, the file description says it was "for snipercycling", and this is the only contribution that this user has on Commons. If it is their own work, needs OTRS verification. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:58, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:44, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dr Roy Swank.jpg

No source information Dronebogus (talk) 18:32, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:45, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:R211A14thstreet.jpg

This file was initially tagged by ARMcgrath as Speedy (speedy). Please provide a deletion reason. I note that the file is currently in use. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:32, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 12:50, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Virginie Hucher.jpg

plus utile Virginir hucher (talk) 19:35, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Unused personal photo, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 12:52, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:DrosophilaTegula 1.jpg

It is no longer accurate, and has been removed from the page it was on ENLesser (talk) 19:59, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Still in use at es:Tégula (insectos). --Rosenzweig τ 06:56, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no reason for deletion, file is in use. --Wdwd (talk) 12:52, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 22516ali (talk · contribs)

Out of scope diagrams. Editor's other uploads are a mess and need review by someone who speaks the language, but these are clearly junk.

* Pppery * _{it has begun...} 20:08, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:54, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 22516ali (talk · contribs) 2

Unused files of doubtful provenance, uploaded for use on fawiki by a user indefinitely blocked there for unsourced edits there.

— 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:45, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 14:20, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Relax Korce.jpg

there are meta data, so maybe these images are uploaded by the photographer. but they were first published on social media accounts of an official goverment agency: https://www.instagram.com/p/CuL_RxNtIvv/ (FB too) Albinfo (talk) 21:24, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is true that they were published on the website of the National Forestry Agency. I took the photos and can send them to you without the copyright file 185.158.0.190 04:18, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I dashur @Mikel Nako!

Thank you for the feedback. If you can upload it without watermark, preferably in higher resolution, I'm happy to stop my deletion request. You can scroll down on the file page to "file versions" > there you find a link to upload better versions of the image files.

In addition, it would be even better and more valuable for Wikipedia, if you could add some more details about the motives: where exactly the images were taken, what we can see.

Thank you. Albinfo (talk) 13:52, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, missing permission (via COM:VRTS). --Wdwd (talk) 12:56, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ekonomi Pyjore Korce.jpg

there are meta data, so maybe these images are uploaded by the photographer. but they were first published on social media accounts of an official goverment agency: https://www.instagram.com/p/CuL_RxNtIvv/ Albinfo (talk) 21:25, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is true that they were published on the website of the National Forestry Agency. I took the photos and can send them to you without the copyright file 185.158.0.190 04:20, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I dashur @Mikel Nako!

Thank you for the feedback. If you can upload it without watermark, preferably in higher resolution, I'm happy to stop my deletion request. You can scroll down on the file page to "file versions" > there you find a link to upload better versions of the image files.

In addition, it would be even better and more valuable for Wikipedia, if you could add some more details about the motives: where exactly the images were taken, what we can see.

Thank you. Albinfo (talk) 13:51, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, missing permission (via COM:VRTS). --Wdwd (talk) 12:56, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Faded anti-North Korean graffiti near Yeosu, South Korea.jpg

I didn't know (or understand) that there wasn't freedom of panorama in South Korea when I uploaded this Toobigtokale (talk) 22:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There's nothing copyrightable to be seen here. Just a simple shack and faded letters below threshold of originality. Herbert Ortner (talk) 06:46, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per user:Herbert Ortner. --Wdwd (talk) 12:58, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:DSc FC2U8AA50Q3.jpg

photo of an image, possibly not own work but derivative work Nutshinou ^Talk! 22:08, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: missing permission for original work. --Wdwd (talk) 12:59, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Foreigner 1996 8x10 - L-R, Jeff Jacobs, Bruce Turgon, Lou Gramm, Ron Wikso, Mick Jones.png

As a promo photo for a musical artist, the copyright for this photo belongs to the photographer, not own work of Ron Wikso - who is in the photo. Copyright notice is visible in bottom right under photo, although it is blurry to see in this copy - it is somewhat legible in this copy here along the lines of ‘Aliyn J. Borrine’ C 1996. PascalHD (talk) 22:23, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:02, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Location of Aoyama cemetery.jpg

Duplicate of File:Aoyama cemetery.jpg. RodRabelo7 (talk) 22:27, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, add redirection. --Wdwd (talk) 13:01, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ceo of mp3nobs.jpg

selfie, in use on abandonned sandbox that isn't making it to mainspace Nutshinou ^Talk! 23:17, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Content created as advertisement/G10. --Wdwd (talk) 13:08, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gilles Tautin.jpg

This is not "simple geometric shapes or text", it is clearly a text, with phrases etc. Thus, it meets the TOO. Veverve (talk) 23:22, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:13, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MuaBanNhanh.png

Advertising. Not useful. Mạnh An (talk) 23:54, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Content created as advertisement/G10. --Wdwd (talk) 13:10, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fileimgweb.jpg

Advertising. Not useful. Mạnh An (talk) 23:55, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Content created as advertisement/G10. --Wdwd (talk) 13:12, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:لوجو فرنسا.png

Quite blatantly not the uploader's own work, unless they are the French Football Federation. This image already exists under fair use on Wikipedia. Unknown Temptation (talk) 11:15, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete Jonteemil (talk) 04:13, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Coffee Hundert Logo.svg

Unused logo for advertisement, no educational value Zafer (talk) 06:21, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agreed. Cool logo, but not much found in a web search. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:50, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 19:38, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:PreviSat 6.0.png

Article wikipedia supprimé 192.54.145.141 13:52, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Maybe there's not enough media coverage for a Wikipedia article, but I'm unconvinced it's off-topic for Commons. Can you name some satellite tracking software that is covered by Wikipedia articles? Maybe there is some. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:56, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:23, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:PreviSat 6.0.png

Article wikipedia supprimé 192.54.200.178 09:16, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep per the last deletion request thread, and don't request deletion again 10 days after this one is closed as keep. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:57, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Ikan Kekek. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:48, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Luigi le Fáinne Óir.png

While the uploader undoubtedly took this photo, it seems unlikely that it is eligible for release to an "own work" Commons licence as the product/character represented is likely rights protected. See COM:DM Ireland. (Delighted if I'm wrong, but I don't think I am. At least this needs review...) Johnj1995 (talk) 03:46, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:59, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Frosinone Calcio foto Store leone fr.jpg

This is a photograph of a copyrighted logo hosted on en.wikipedia.org [4]. This photograph is clearly not de minimis, focusing exclusively on the logo. Unknown Temptation (talk) 11:53, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I took the photo myself. I photographed the Frosinone Calcio store, which is located outside the stadium, therefore in a public area. The photo I took is of an external wall of the store building. I really don't think it's forbidden to photograph an external wall of a building that is outside the stadium, in a public space, outside. It is certainly not prohibited by Italian law, as the photo was taken in Italy. -- Sardognunu (talk) 12:51, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not 'de minimis'. The photograph display only the logo, it's not possible to check than it come from a public area. It would need to be a photograph of all the store to be 'de minimis'. Miniwark (talk) 14:15, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:37, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Royal Mail vehicle logo (Scotland).jpg

derivative of non-free content; there is no TOO for 2D graphical works in the UK FASTILY 05:16, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:54, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:St-Brevin-serpent1.jpg

keine Panoramafreiheit in Frankreich 80.187.118.139 06:39, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails COM:FOP France. The artist Huang Yong Ping died in 2019, can be undeleted in 2090. --A1Cafel (talk) 09:15, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:54, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Serpent de mer à Saint-Brevin - vue proche.jpg

keine Panoramafreiheit in Frankreich 80.187.118.139 06:40, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails COM:FOP France. The artist Huang Yong Ping died in 2019, can be undeleted in 2090. --A1Cafel (talk) 09:15, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:54, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Serpent de mer à Saint-Brevin - vue globale.jpg

keine Panoramafreiheit in Frankreich 80.187.118.139 06:41, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails COM:FOP France. The artist Huang Yong Ping died in 2019, can be undeleted in 2090. --A1Cafel (talk) 09:15, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:54, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Le Serpent d'océan (Estuaire de la Loire) (9313907702).jpg

no freedom of panorama in France Lukas Beck (talk) 09:27, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails COM:FOP France. The artist Huang Yong Ping died in 2019, can be undeleted in 2090. --A1Cafel (talk) 09:16, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:54, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Saint Brévin les pins - Serpent d'océan 01.jpg

no freedom of panorama in France Lukas Beck (talk) 09:27, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails COM:FOP France. The artist Huang Yong Ping died in 2019, can be undeleted in 2090. --A1Cafel (talk) 09:15, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:54, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Saint Brévin les pins - Serpent d'océan 02.jpg

no freedom of panorama in France Lukas Beck (talk) 09:27, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails COM:FOP France. The artist Huang Yong Ping died in 2019, can be undeleted in 2090. --A1Cafel (talk) 09:16, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:54, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:St-Brevin-serpent1 cropped.jpg

No FoP in France. Yann (talk) 16:39, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:53, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:习近平.webp

Probable violation of copyright Apollovvv (talk) 18:38, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Bottom of the website listed in summary states "版权所有：中国政府网" which roughly translates to "Copyright belongs to: Website of the Chinese government" (which I would assume is www.gov.cn itself), therefore making this photo a possible copyright violation unless consent was granted to post this photo onto Commons.

SBS6577P (talk) 10:58, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:53, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Google Maps ocean blue.png

GoogleMaps CopyVio. (???)

Okay, this one is a LOT more tricky. It shows a well-defined extent as per the description, but it's also complete uniformly in the light blue that Google uses for water surfaces. One could argue that the mapping style (including the color palette) belongs to GM's copyright as well, so we would be able to host the color yes - but not while promoting it as the GM color for water.

One might argue on the other hand that Google can't own copyright on uniformly blue screenshots. Enyavar (talk) 22:21, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A color, on its own, must surely be below the threshold of originality. But the image is unused, and I can't imagine any obvious educational use for it. Omphalographer (talk) 01:21, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:08, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rplace2023.jpg

Non-free work. Betseg (talk) 22:58, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep If the uploader has taken a screenshot of a collaborative work in a public forum to which they have contributed, they are both a contributing artist and the photographer, and as such have the rights to the image. Doughbo (talk) 23:09, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See also comments on a similar thread. Doughbo (talk) 23:12, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The uploader obviously did not create the entire image by themselves, so they do not own the rights to it. Furthermore, the "fuck spez" discussion is irrelevant because that one was regarding de minimis, which is not applicable here because the art is the focus of the image. Di (they-them) (talk) 22:32, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete overwhelming amount of non-free content, and other r/place canvases were deleted on Commons for the same exact reason. SergioFLS (talk) 17:53, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as mostly written by other people. ClydeFranklin (t/c) 01:59, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:08, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Breaking Bad Heisenberg ILLUSTRATION WORK.jpg

Drawing is of Copyrighted character Walter White. CC drawings of copyrighed characters are not allowed on commons. MrNoobNub2 (talk) 01:11, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:26, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Average European DNA.png

This file was initially tagged by Wikiedro as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: F5. Missing essential information: Not source (not verifiable), primary source with false information and inaccuracies (comparatively to reliable genetic studies, especially case of Mexico, compare other studies: 1, 2).. I allow discussion for a week. Taivo (talk) 08:35, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 18:02, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:US Raon.png

Image already exists under fair use on English Wikipedia. The uploader here has admitted that it is not their own work, that they have drawn it on a computer program and the original author is unknown. Unknown Temptation (talk) 11:17, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 18:18, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Previsat.png

Article wikipedia supprimé 192.54.145.141 13:53, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 18:19, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Previsat.png

Article wikipedia supprimé 192.54.145.141 13:56, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 18:19, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo previsat.png

Article wikipedia supprimé 192.54.145.141 13:56, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 18:19, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Previsat5.0.png

Article wikipedia supprimé 192.54.145.141 13:56, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 18:19, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Previsat3.0.png

The world map in the background is likely not the uploader's own work High Contrast (talk) 17:11, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The world map comes from a free site and I have re-worked it to include it in my software (change of format, dimension and size).

Which "free site"? --High Contrast (talk) 18:55, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, the web site doesn't exist no more but you can find the original image here : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Earthmap1000x500.jpg

You should link that on the description page of the image we are discussing about --High Contrast (talk) 14:40, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK

Kept: Background source issue solved. Badseed ^talk 18:42, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please be sure to add all relevant information to the image description. You missed that. --High Contrast (talk) 22:40, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There was a reference link, but it sure needed moving. Thanks for the heads up - Badseed ^talk 23:25, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Previsat3.0.png

Article wikipedia supprimé 192.54.145.141 13:57, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 18:19, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Previsat22.jpg

Article wikipedia supprimé 192.54.145.141 13:57, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 18:20, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Previsat3.1.png

Article wikipedia supprimé 192.54.145.141 13:58, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 18:20, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Previsat5.1.png

Article wikipedia supprimé 192.54.145.141 13:58, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 18:20, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Previsions5.0.png

Article wikipedia supprimé 192.54.145.141 14:07, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 18:20, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hoshimachi Suisei.png

Copyvio. While the source video was tagged as CC by the uploader, this character and the artwork itself are copyrighted COVER corp, per: https://hololive.hololivepro.com/en/talents/hoshimachi-suisei/ Grayfell (talk) 19:06, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is clearly copyvio. 185.172.241.184 06:36, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Copyright violation. --Krorokeroro (talk) 15:03, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Same type files

Obove are other files also featuring hololive telents, which have sources not from their own channels, but from other talents CC videos. Some of the files have replaced free-use files on zhwiki, these nominations were made by Commons/zhwiki admin Shizhao (discussion). Cookai🍪 _(💬talk) 16:21, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 20:53, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sammalhabe tänavakunstnik Edward von Lõnguse kujutatuna. 2018. aasta mai, Lossi 36, Riigikohtu vastas.jpg

No freedom of panorama in Estonia A1Cafel (talk) 03:43, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edward von Lõngus has given permission to publish their work in Commons. Sillerkiil (talk) 04:03, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please submit the permission to VRT--A1Cafel (talk) 04:37, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"given permission" means that THERE IS A PERMISSION IN THE VRT system. That is by no means the only artwork from him...

How many images do you plan to nominate for deletion? Kruusamägi (talk) 14:06, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Kruusamägi: Is ticket:2014123010011481 valid for all of the artist's works? —holly {chat} 18:16, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes.

He has also publicly stated that same thing. For instace in this letter. Kruusamägi (talk) 21:00, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —holly {chat} 17:40, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Statue of Charles de Gaulle in Moscow

All images contain an artwork that are protected by copyright. Not COM:FOP, see COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing. OTRS is missing.

Andrey Korzun (talk) 09:32, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Statue of Charles de Gaulle in Moscow

The statue was completed in 2005 by Zurab Tsereteli (1934–). There is no freedom of panorama in Russia for non-architectural works, permission from the artist required.

A1Cafel (talk) 02:50, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Charles de Gaulle statue in Moscow-2.jpg — De minimis Avsolov (talk) 18:49, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Гостиница "Космос" м.ВДНХ, Москва, Россия. - panoramio - Oleg Yu.Novikov (5).jpg, File:Гостиница "Космос" м.ВДНХ, Москва, Россия. - panoramio - Oleg Yu.Novikov (6).jpg, File:Гостиница "Космос" м.ВДНХ, Москва, Россия. - panoramio - Oleg Yu.Novikov (7).jpg, File:Гостиница "Космос" м.ВДНХ, Москва, Россия. - panoramio - Oleg Yu.Novikov (8).jpg, File:Гостиница "Космос" м.ВДНХ, Москва, Россия. - panoramio - Oleg Yu.Novikov (9).jpg — other statue. These images must be examined in separate case. Avsolov (talk) 18:54, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: only the first one per nomination. Kept the 2nd one as de minimis, and a procedural keep for the remainder as they are of a different statue. —holly {chat} 18:12, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bruce Adamson.jpg

The file is a portrait of Bruce Adamson taken by Scottish Parliament, which licenses the image under the Scottish Parliament Copyright Licence (SPCL, detailed in the file's EXIF information). According to the explanation of SPCL, it is aligned with {{OGL3}}, except that works licensed under SPCL must not be used for party political purposes or advertising endorsement. This condition violates COM:L#Acceptable licenses, so the file should be therefore deleted if there is no free license received. 廣九直通車 (talk) 05:53, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: {{Scottish Parliament Copyright Licence}} is a valid license. —holly {chat} 18:17, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Monument to Jakob Hurt

No FoP in Estonia, artist Jaak Soans is still alive

A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is a following Permission Ticket: Ticket:2020071910004071

Kruusamägi (talk) 04:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: We have VRT verification for these items. —holly {chat} 01:44, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logofcflers.png

User is unlikely to be the creator of the image (the football club) and has already been warned for uploading several copyrighted images, including this one before! Unknown Temptation (talk) 11:23, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 01:48, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo ASSE 2021.jpg

Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 01:48, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:AS Saint-Étienne logo.png

Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 01:48, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Clivenselogo.png

No evidence offered by this user that they are the representative of this football club and the original author of the logo. Unknown Temptation (talk) 11:42, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 01:51, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LupettoAnni80.png

This was a logo used by AS Roma in the 1980s and on occasion still used by the team on merchandise and throwback shirts. Extraordinary claim to be the original author of this logo and no evidence offered for it. Unknown Temptation (talk) 11:44, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 01:51, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kattie Katey (Storm) (talk · contribs)

A1Cafel (talk) 02:23, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The National Institute of Informatics "All Rights Reserved" covers their text, and may not cover the images which come from another organization. The images come from the Japan Meteorological Agency and they may not even be the originator, the Japanese government agency that owns the satellite is probably the copyright holder. --RAN (talk) 02:47, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per COM:PCP, we'd need permission from the Japanese government agency. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:39, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Typhoon123456 (talk · contribs)

A1Cafel (talk) 02:25, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per COM:PCP, copyright status of images is unknown. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:57, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:PINATUBO 1991-06-15 0600UTC.jpg

Deleted: No free license shown at source. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:57, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Farense.svg

Not own work, image is hosted as fair use on en.wikipedia Unknown Temptation (talk) 11:33, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per COM:PCP, no evidence that the logo is in the public domain. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:00, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pirin 1937.png

Blatant nationalist POV and even hoax. No source. Jingiby (talk) 18:43, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

абе бугар еден скапан иди терај си животот не замарај крвта да ти ја ебам. мизерни сте МИЗЕРНИ. БЕЛ ДЕН ДА НЕ ВИДИТЕ СИТЕ ДО ЕДЕН ДА СОТРЕТЕ. Уште 100 пати да ме банирате уште 100 нови акаунти ќе направам се ти ебам живо. Поздрав. Bojan9Spasovski (talk) 18:47, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Should be easy to find a source, if there’s one. Eitherway, cannot be deleted while it’s in use:

Keep, for now. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 14:40, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There are no sources. In 1934 the Comintern gave its support to the idea that the Macedonian Slavs constituted a separate nation. Prior to the Second World War, this view on the Macedonian issue had been of little practical importance. However, during the war these ideas were supported by the pro-Yugoslav Macedonian communist partisans, who strengthened their positions in 1943. After the Red Army entered the Balkans in late 1944, new communist regimes came into power in Bulgaria and Yugoslavia. In this way their policy on the Macedonian Question was committed to the Comintern policy of supporting the development of a distinct ethnic Macedonian consciousness. In 1945 the population was proclaimed to be ethnic Macedonian, a nationality different from Bulgarians. With the proclamation of the Socialist Republic of Macedonia as part of the Yugoslav federation, the new authorities also enforced measures that would overcome the pro-Bulgarian feeling among parts of its population. Jingiby (talk) 17:21, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep COM:INUSE, and all of this sounds like history. All nations are ultimately fictional, as there's nothing objective about boundaries or dividing people based on anything in particular, so whatever may have been propaganda in the past that successfully or unsuccessfully incited the development of a national identity is topical for encyclopedias. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:00, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You’re right about being in use and therefore it should be kept. The rest is just nonsense, sorry to say: «All nations are ultimately fictional» — yeah, if you’re talking about Elves and Orcs, maybe, or if all you know about “nations” is fake Anthropology as in the U.S.-centric mislabels "Caucasian" or "Latino" (and I’m sure you know about these matters more deeply, given your Babel). In the context of this DR, the word "nation" means ethnolinguistic community, seen in a territorial and diachronic perspective. The o.p. contends that this clearly modern map (not a historical document) showing 1937 census data is an attempt at falsifying history, since the ethnonym "Macedonian" (as a Slavic-speaking community) was not in use before the mid-1940s. That may be true (as Bojan implies) or not (as Jingby says), but it should be easy to check the original census data and how exactly it’s labelled:
- Are Slavic-speakers termed Bulgarians or Macedonians in the 1937 census date this map was based on? (Or, better: is the Slavic language covered here labelled as Bulgarian or as Macedonian?)
- Is there 1937 data matching these numbers?
- Is there 1937 data matching these map boundaries?
- Was there indeed any 1937 census at all?, or was this map fully made up from thin air?
That’s what we could be discussing here: As said, not a reason to delete the file, and not a reason to ruminate about all borders being subjective — but surely a reason to tag it with {{Disputed map}}. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 14:11, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of nations didn't exist before World War II, which doesn't make them "fake" now (I may be misreading you from limited data, but you're coming across to me as being like the subset of Zionists who say that Palestinians don't exist because there was no Palestinian nationality as opposed to Syrian Arabs until some time in the 20th century), and moreover, there are nations such as Switzerland that are not based on a single language and various nations that are not defined by ethnicity. I can't read either Bulgarian or Macedonian, so I don't have an opinion about the document, and I wouldn't know whether there was a 1937 census, but what I do know is that there is nothing permanent about boundaries, and nations rise and fall. How many of the nations that existed 2,000 years ago still exist today (sure, China - there are some - now take it back another 2,000 years)? And don't try to make me as an individual American whose mother was a famous very real anthropologist answer for bullshit U.S. designations like "Caucasian" that derive from 19th-century pseudo-scientific racism. But since we agree to enforce the relevant policy, that's the end of the discussion, really. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:50, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No census was conducted in the Kingdom of Bulgaria in 1937. It was in 1934 and there were no people who self-identified as Macedonians on it. Jingiby (talk) 07:34, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. So those are facts, then. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:15, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Then let’s add {{Disputed map}} to this file page, warn editors about this in the talk pages of the articles that use this image, and close this DR. When this file becomes unused, a new DR can be opened based on the notion that this is an unused map with fake data and no historical interest — should this be instead a scan of a printed map widely circulated in the 1980s, with the same contents, now that would be a historically interesting forgery. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 14:26, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, you’re misreading me, big time. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 14:28, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good, I'm glad that's not where you meant to go with this. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:04, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There are also File:Pirin 1946.png and File:Pirin 1956.png. I believe that we only can keep all three maps if the source for all the data will be provided. The uploader cannot do that because he is indefeintely blocked. We can wait a bit more if anybody else do it; otherwise these unsourced data must be deleted. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:52, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion; per COM:INUSE, Commons does not overrule other projects about what is in scope.. —holly {chat} 00:45, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Stemma torino anni 80.jpg

According to Wikimedia Commons itself, public domain in Italy is lifetime 70 years in case of works with a known author, and publication 70 years in case of unknown author. Both of these are flat-out impossible for a work from the 1980s. Unknown Temptation (talk) 11:50, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 05:20, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographs by Heinrich Hoffmann without free license

File:Petain Hitler.jpg no permission; alternative low resolution image with permission: File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-H25217, Henry Philippe Petain und Adolf Hitler.jpg
File:Hitler leaving the church.jpeg not PD-old-70

The photographs of Heinrich Hoffmann are copyrighted in Germany until 70 years after Hoffmann's death. They will enter the public domain in Germany only on January 1, 2028. --Reise Reise (talk) 11:37, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The first one can be undeleted in 2036 (1940 photo), and the second in 2028. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:46, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo Olympique Lyonnais - 2022.svg

This image is hosted under fair use on en.wikipedia.org [5] While it could be debated that it would be simple letters and shapes if it didn't have the lion, I don't think anyone could call that lion a simple geometric shape Unknown Temptation (talk) 11:56, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete : I agree, not PD-text logo. Bloody-libu (talk) 05:37, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:47, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:پشت تنگه سراب دربند.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Modern Sciences as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: this is not own work
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as no evidence was provided. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:17, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment In the EXIF, the "Copyright holder" line says "COPYRIGHT, 2011," but in the summary, the Date is given as 2 April 2023. Could User:مجاهد مصلی please explain that? Did you take the photo? If so, when did you shoot it? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:54, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ikan, such kind of entries in the metadata, especially when it's a phonecamera or a low-end digital camera, are often default-entries by the camera-producer and not to be taken serious. See for example File:BR-316 em Petrolândia - PE.jpg, taken with the same model. --Túrelio (talk) 06:49, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So that's the year of manufacture? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:18, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Or simply the year when the camera-firmware was programmed. --Túrelio (talk) 07:26, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:15, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No hits on Tineye, no evidence that this is not an own work. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:37, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Disney characters in Category:Stamps of Ukraine, 2023

Copyrighted US character artwork. Artwork seems to be reused from Disney stock art. Not COM:De minimis.

(Oinkers42) (talk) 15:46, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Would that mean the Azerbaijani stamps featuring the characters:

File:Stamp of Azerbaijan - 1998 - Colnect 289110 - Goofy bishop and king.jpeg

File:Stamp of Azerbaijan - 1998 - Colnect 289115 - Goofy Donald and pawn.jpeg

File:Stamp of Azerbaijan - 1998 - Colnect 289114 - Daisy Duck bishop and king.jpeg

File:Stamp of Azerbaijan - 1998 - Colnect 289107 - Mickey Minnie Pluto and queen.jpeg

File:Stamp of Azerbaijan - 1998 - Colnect 289109 - Mickey Minnie pawn and rook.jpeg

would also be subject to deletion? Bookish Worm (talk) 15:51, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

These are in a more gray area, as they seem to be original art of the characters created for the stamps. (Oinkers42) (talk) 15:54, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was planning on doing a deletion request for the Azerbaijan stamps at some point if no one does nominates them for deletion in the meantime. I think it's better to leave them out of this DR for now though since different countries are different, obviously, and it just risks needlessly over complicating things. --Adamant1 (talk) 02:04, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep These are PD in the Ukraine as official documents, so they should be fine. This is similar to a photograph of a mural of a copyrighted character that falls under FOP. --PaterMcFly (talk) 12:17, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete See my comment in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Mickey Mouse on stamps and prior DRs for similar images that resulted in them being deleted. Not to get to down in the weeds about copyright law, but what this comes down to is that there's zero evidence that a third party releasing an image of an otherwise copyrighted work under a free license modifies the copyright of the original. Like if I were to release a public domain document containing Disney characters in it that wouldn't mean Mickey Mouse is now is PD, if anything I'd probably be sued. There's also zero evidence that these stamps were released with permission from Disney or were designed by them. A country like North Korea can release stamps containing Disney characters all they want, but at the end of the day so what? We need actual evidence that the original characters are now in the public domain, which we don't have and these are clearly stock images in the meantime. --Adamant1 (talk) 02:01, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I think the other DR was adjudged incorrectly. Let's look at it this way: There's no way that Disney's legal team authorizes the creation of these stamps without the knowledge that Ukraine's laws (and Azerbaijan's in the other case) will make these specific images public domain. Of course, this doesn't mean other depictions of the same characters are also public domain, just the ones that are on these stamps. —holly {chat} 00:38, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:39, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kitara historical-sites.jpg

Not own work. I'm relatively certain this is a COPYVIO from an academic publication on African historical sites. PARAKANYAA (talk) 09:32, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it does look like this was originally posted in an academic publication, TinEye shows no hits. Abzeronow (talk) 18:59, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copied from https://www.jstor.org/stable/183031?seq=12. I replaced it with my own version of the map, File:Main archaeological sites of the interlacustrine kingdoms.svg. —holly {chat} 18:09, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Əmin Abid.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Dr.Wiki54 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: RFLE

Circa 1920s or 1930s photograph from Azerbaijan (the photograph's creation was before Radio Free Europe even existed). Subject was born in 1898 and died in 1937. It could be public domain but we need information on the actual photographer. Abzeronow (talk) 15:26, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no source, no information on provenance. —holly {chat} 18:14, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Coat of Arms of Kingdom of France.png

Misleading and useless : no achievement exists with such crown and flags 2A01:CB00:D26:F600:295F:2440:5B7E:18B 01:05, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Any thoughts on the other files by this uploader? At a minimum, [:File:Flag of King of France.png]] directly includes this coat of arms, so if this CoA is incorrect, the flag can't be right either. Omphalographer (talk) 05:16, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, no educational value, not in use on the projects. --Ellywa (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]