Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/05/01

Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive May 1st, 2021
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:Redundant. Created when Category:Dyrus was relatively empty. I have since found several alternatives and do not think that this extracted image is required anymore (low resolution, subject's face is awkward) BriefEdits (talk) 08:33, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note - Unnecessary deletion request; I've tagged it for speedy deletion. Pbrks (talk) 15:23, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 18:22, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Nonsense SumL996 (talk) 09:44, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nonsense request by an Android app user. --Achim (talk) 19:35, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Por equivocacion de noticia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Urisze (talk • contribs) 12:37, 1 May 2021‎ (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete per COM:CSD#G7, the above, and this edit.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 14:44, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 18:21, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{copyvio|1=Sur le site officiel de la liste Bretagne d'Avenir, les photographies des têtes de liste sont réalisées par le photographe Simon Cohen (https://avenir.bzh/fr/mentions-legales/). A priori, sauf mention contraire de l'auteur, cette photographie est sous copyright.}} Abujoy (talk) 15:55, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 18:34, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Better file uploaded Jeffrey000 (talk) 16:22, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeffrey000: If a better file was uploaded, there is a way to replace this image instead of nominating it for deletion. Please contact the help desk for an image replacement request. KullyKeemaKa (talk) 17:00, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeffrey000: Never mind the second half of what I said before. To replace an image with a better version, click on "Upload a new version of this file" in the "File history" section. KullyKeemaKa (talk) 19:04, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: COM:LL - YouTube source is a "Twitch highlights" video containing clips from multiple sources. Uploader, Twitch Media, is not the copyright holder of the component clips and thus cannot license them. --Эlcobbola talk 08:39, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

caricato immagine di prova sbagliata Veronica.Strazzari (talk) 19:23, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 20:35, 2 Mai 2021 UTC: Copyright violation: https://www.facebook.com/279782269037210/photos/828675267481238/ --Krdbot 08:56, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by GhostP. as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Professional photo uploaded by random user; No proof of own work AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:00, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept. OTRS permission accepted (non-admin closure). Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:54, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

People used my Image (This image) without mentioning my name as a photographer. I decided to delete this Image or add a smaller sized one to wikimedia. MohammadReza (talk) 08:08, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:41, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: No reason to delete, as per [1]. Yann (talk) 13:13, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the Photographer of this image, I have uploaded it by a mistake, I requested a deletion in 2015 and the file was deleted! but I dont know why it is here again. MohammadReza (talk) 17:13, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete @Yann: Uploader request made 3 days after upload was a clearly valid reason for deletion per our Deletion policy (G7). Why did you suggest that it was not? The image is unused. Ankry (talk) 00:24, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
OK, fine. Yann (talk) 18:59, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination: deleyed, but this uploader request qualifies for speedy. --Ankry (talk) 12:40, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:WEBHOST: personal images with no claim to notability EpicPupper (talk) 20:26, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: LTA sock upload - either COM:NOTHOST or COM:NETCOPYVIO (or both). --Эlcobbola talk 20:12, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

meanwhile better version focussed on the kidney grilles. Wikisympathisant (talk) 15:38, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:44, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:44, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless file, inflammatory Bongo4561 (talk) 15:44, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:44, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of video stream. No free license. (Seems to affect all images in Category:Umbau des Alpinen Museums München) 2A02:810D:6C0:2FB0:74CE:7672:9144:1E3F 16:48, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Proper source needed so we can determine the licence. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:43, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work of the uploader. jdx Re: 16:50, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:42, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A different screenshot of the "Wide Putin" video was deleted pursuant to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Wide putin.jpg, and I see no reason why this would be different. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 07:31, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; COM:DW on youtube video. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:24, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private content, unused. GeorgHHtalk   17:05, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:42, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality file in an inferior file type used only to promote a non-notable news company on enwp. Also very unlikely that this image has been released under CC BY-SA 4.0 (though it definitely fails TOO). Anarchyte (work | talk) 17:05, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:42, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jannu Akhil (talk · contribs)

edit

Book covers, to store this files we need written permission via OTRS.

GeorgHHtalk   17:25, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:42, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eddykytano (talk · contribs)

edit

Private image collection, all unused.

GeorgHHtalk   17:29, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:41, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:23, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:40, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:24, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:40, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks to be copied from https://egr.vcu.edu/media/school-of-engineering/images/egr/50859350058_6c2cefc6e3_k.jpg 108.56.139.120 20:24, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:40, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 20:42, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:40, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:26, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:31, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found several places on the internet, his yt channel for one. TherasTaneel (talk) 22:27, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:21, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 22:29, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:30, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found here on imdb where it's noted as a "Photo by Shanna Fisher". TherasTaneel (talk) 22:31, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:21, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of copyrighted artwork. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 23:06, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:20, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 83.200.8.204 23:25, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Nothing what would suggest that it's cc. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:20, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doesn't seem to be own work, a different user uploaded the same image as own work, and appears to be from a book or publication. IronBattalion (talk) 23:50, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Proper source needed so we can determine the licence. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:20, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey this is my great, great grandfather and this is his image on a small card i have that was passed on from my family. Since the image is 120 years old and of a relative I don’t think there is a copyright issue. Please help? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Military112 (talk • contribs) 01:37, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Roman Kubanskiy as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: dubious own work; was published before 1 AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:13, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: It does look to me like a photo of a photo or a screen. We need to have a better source filled to determine the right licence. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:41, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Piotrus as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Badly formatted, very visibly copied from some webpage, clearly not the work of the editor who uploaded it. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:14, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:41, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This artist is requesting all pictures of her face and full name be removed from internet and both are provided in this picture 2603:8001:A000:58C9:C86D:A679:3CD5:3061 01:20, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not a valid reason for deletion but likey out of scope. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:43, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

“FBMD” in metadata = Facebook download. OTRS needed. Ytoyoda (talk) 01:24, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:43, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

“FBMD” in metadata = Facebook download Ytoyoda (talk) 01:50, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:43, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Almost every image in this collage is obviously under copyright (screenshots from films, press photos, etc) Mcrsftdog (talk) 02:34, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Use of unsourced images. GeorgHHtalk   20:26, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:44, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant street scenery. Two images have been moved to Category:SM City Pampanga while 9 others have been moved to Category:N3 highway (Philippines). The rest – these nominated images – show an unremarkable footbridge and are redundant to everything that already exists at Category:N3 highway (Philippines).

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:38, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. I can't see how nearly the same photos of the subject can be all used for educational purposes. I did keep 3 photos of the footbridge from different angles. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:51, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Com:Derivative works - illuminated boards showing various audiovisual slides, collages, portraits, and artistic background designs. (Note if all images are to be deleted, the entire category will become empty too)

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:48, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. No FoP in Philippines Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Philippines. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:54, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Com:Derivative works of portraits of Gen. Alejo Santos (1911–1984). Undated images: who is the photographer and when he/she died, and when were the portraits first published? Maybe COM:URAA-compliant? Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle may roll in.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:02, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No FoP in Philippines Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Philippines. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:58, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Com:Derivative work copyvios: missing artists' permissions in licensing these images of their artworks (likely under temporal exhibition) under commercial licensing (PD).

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:06, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. One of them could be de minis perhaps if it was the only artwork but the purpose of the photo is clearly to show the artists' work, IMO de minis can't be aplicable here (And I also like to the rule "If not sure, delete it"). --Podzemnik (talk) 03:01, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contemporary artworks by still-alive Bulakeño artists. Missing their permissions in the uploader's use of commercial (PD) licensing for his images of their copyrighted artworks. Also nominated are images showing various collages and portraits (COM:Derivative works).

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:16, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • A blatant disregard of artists' economic rights of commercial exploitation and communication to public by freely taking photos of these and the uploader's use of Commons-compatible licensing (commercial public domain licensing), without their permission (COM:OTRS). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:44, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:02, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This pattern is sacrate for Javaé people. I did this digitalization before I undertand I shouldn't do it. So the right think to do is deleting it, and if someday one from this etnic group uploud a similar image, just then it will be respectfull. For now, deleting is the only respectfull choice. Besides that, this image is Innacurate. Pescarts (talk) 21:52, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I trust the nominator. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:04, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This pattern is sacrate for Assurini people. I did this digitalization before I undertand I shouldn't do it. So the right think to do is deleting it, and if someday one from this etnic group uploud a similar image, just then it will be respectfull. For now, deleting is the only respectfull choice. Pescarts (talk) 21:48, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I trust the nominator. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:04, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]



This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:CUR Aruba, currencies of Aruba are copyrighted.

A1Cafel (talk) 04:18, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:08, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Filipe46 (talk · contribs)

edit

Likely copyvios

— Racconish💬 07:22, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Very likely all copvyios. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:10, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 13:25, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat contribs | talk ] 07:30, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 13:25, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat contribs | talk ] 07:31, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 13:26, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat contribs | talk ] 07:31, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 13:40, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat contribs | talk ] 07:32, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 13:41, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat contribs | talk ] 07:33, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, out of scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 13:48, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat contribs | talk ] 07:33, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal document, out of scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 13:48, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat contribs | talk ] 07:34, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 14:29, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat contribs | talk ] 07:35, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Karim elaswany844 (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:32, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HABTAMUN (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album/files storage. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:33, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:33, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stevebillyson (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:33, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This Carabao papermache work was made by Rey Bautista for the 2012 Mandala festival of Pulilan. There is no freedom of panorama in the Philippines yet. Unsure if this is permanent or temporal. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:01, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also by the same uploader

_ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:08, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:06, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Com:Derivative works of paintings and photographs. Missing artists' and photographers' consent in uploader's use of commercial licensing.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:03, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:07, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 09:46, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:11, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is out of scope for the project MeisterAbababa (talk) 09:54, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:11, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BarefootHayley (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of scope

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 14:53, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:12, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

R2-D2 is a copyrighted design, so these images are not yet able to be hosted on Commons.

russavia (talk) 19:15, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:51, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I believe these two be derivatives of a copyrighted character, and therefore, subject to copyright.

Themightyquill (talk) 13:32, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted R2D2 is a copyrighted character. There are additional images in this category which could be checked/nominated. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:30, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Commons:Deletion requests/File:R2-D2 (10585062134).jpg (COM:TOYS)

Josve05a (talk) 23:30, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted I have included File:Maker Faire 2007 - S2-D2 (508247085).jpg in the deletions because it is not useful with the large areas of pixelation in the middle. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:19, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

R2-D2 is a copyrighted work.

G I Chandor (talk) 00:45, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:36, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW. Copyrighted characters.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:00, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • About a decade ago someone nominated a whole whack of pictures of model cars for deletion - you know the ones that are children's toys. The nomination claimed that a picture of a toy Mustang car violated a copyright. I can't remember for sure now, but I think they were claiming the pictures of the model violated Mattel's copyright, not the copyright of the Ford Motor Company. The strange thing is that no one objects to pictures of actual Mustang cars, just to models of them. I find that counter-intuitive.
  • I put the three R2D2 costumes I uploaded into a cosplay category. So, when someone takes a picture of someone wearing a Wonder Woman costume, or a Spiderman costume, are they violating a copyright? Is the person who makes themself a Wonder Woman or Spiderman costume violating a copyright? If those pictures violate a copyright, is it the copyright of Marvel, or of the amateur costume maker?
  • Is someone going to argue these arguments apply to the images in Category:Cosplay of Bender (Futurama)? Geo Swan (talk) 01:37, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Yuraily Lic: most of these are costumes made by fans. If I understand your argumentation this picture should be deleted because it is a derivated work, but not this one which is also a derivated work made in lego. The only difference is the building material. --Cody escadron delta (d) 05:50, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to submit a DR about it, you can do it. I am not obligated to submit DRs for all copyvios files, and I won't stop you. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:53, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Yuraily Lic: you absolutely not answer to me. --Cody escadron delta (d) 06:02, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete These seem like obvious copyright violations here. Some kid in a cardboard box painted blue and white would be a stretch for deletion, but all the ones I looked at above are near exact copies. - Themightyquill (talk) 08:16, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and discussions above. --Wdwd (talk) 15:24, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted character.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 00:02, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Addition,

--Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:54, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:39, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted character. See also above DRs.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:41, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 18:12, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted character. See also above DRs.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:25, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:12, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted character. See also above DRs.

DMacks (talk) 03:34, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, I was careful to only pick files that actually contained (in my view) a substantial and clear image of R2-D2, rather than de minimis, merely relating to it, or something so stylized that it was not a DW of that specific robot. For the file you mention, it appears so clearly to be this subject as a substantive part of this image, even though it's redrawn by hand; see Commons:Fan art#Copyright in fan art. One could replace it with a different generic/free robot, but one could not simply crop it out altogether. DMacks (talk) 13:51, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: almost all, per nomination, except for the one released by the Star Wars account on Flickr. --Rosenzweig τ 01:23, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurry, subject obscured SierraTangoCharlie1 (talk) 16:01, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:12, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pixabay image published after 9 January 2019, incompatible with Commons: https://pixabay.com/photos/singapor-marina-bay-sands-hotel-3977992/   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 16:12, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:13, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian- Out of Scope --Alaa :)..! 16:16, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:12, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Was only used on a now deleted Wikidata item about a non-notable person Mbch331 (talk) 16:46, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:14, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of video stream. No free license. 2A02:810D:6C0:2FB0:74CE:7672:9144:1E3F 16:46, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:14, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of video stream. No free license. (Seems to affect all images in Category:Umbau des Alpinen Museums München) 2A02:810D:6C0:2FB0:74CE:7672:9144:1E3F 16:47, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:14, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of video stream. No free license. (Seems to affect all images in Category:Umbau des Alpinen Museums München) 2A02:810D:6C0:2FB0:74CE:7672:9144:1E3F 16:48, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:14, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of video stream. No free license. (Seems to affect all images in Category:Umbau des Alpinen Museums München) 2A02:810D:6C0:2FB0:74CE:7672:9144:1E3F 16:49, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:14, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of video stream. No free license. (Seems to affect all images in Category:Umbau des Alpinen Museums München) 2A02:810D:6C0:2FB0:74CE:7672:9144:1E3F 16:49, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Permission requested. Please wait a few days. --Tkarcher (talk) 07:34, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Permission was denied. :-/ So yes, I'm afraid we'll need to delete all images in this category. Uploader was informed already and agrees. --Tkarcher (talk) 09:33, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:14, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag). PD-simple? AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:16, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, no license, not simple. Thuresson (talk) 12:26, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a contested speedy deletion. This file was initially tagged by Righanred as Copyvio (db-f9) and the most recent rationale was: url=https://twitter.com/xychelsea/status/1380583120148307968. However, the source clearly indicates a creative commons license. Elli (talk) 00:41, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept, CC-BY-SA-4.0 according to Twitter. Obviously selfie by subject. Thuresson (talk) 12:29, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The word "daw?nphotography" is written on this photo. Is this photo really an uploader's work? Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:27, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, uploader is currently blocked for uploading unfree files. Thuresson (talk) 12:38, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal logo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 13:31, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, not used, uploader is permanently blocked from English Wikipedia. Thuresson (talk) 12:43, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo is blurry. Out of project scope due to bad quality. Taivo (talk) 14:59, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, per nomination. Thuresson (talk) 12:49, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, per nomination. Thuresson (talk) 12:52, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Derivalz (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, per nomination. Thuresson (talk) 12:54, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, per nomination. COM:NOTHOST. Thuresson (talk) 12:57, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For the 40,000th time Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jon Ossoff (US Senator from Georgia) 2021 (cropped).jpg DemonDays64 (talk) 16:26, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

er this one. https://www.atlantamagazine.com/news-culture-articles/11-questions-for-georgia-u-s-senate-candidate-jon-ossoff/ DemonDays64 (talk) 16:27, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted, per nomination. Thuresson (talk) 12:59, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image uploaded is not found within the URL provided to prove as free work (Creative Commons Attribution license) Rain Forest (talk) 06:29, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rain Forest It's because it's the video's thumbnail that was used. Is that not allowed? Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 13:16, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Btspurplegalaxy: As far as my knowledge goes, anything within the video from start to finish stated with a Creative Commons Attribution license can be used, however the thumbnail of a video doesn't fall under the license as it's not within the uploaded video. Another user will decide whether to delete the file or not so I'll agree with whatever their verdict is. Rain Forest (talk) 09:07, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 00:33, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

自分のプライバシーを傷つけると気がつきました 由紀奈 (talk) 02:58, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, courtesy. --Podzemnik (talk) 10:33, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and no license at all. --JuTa 10:16, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: doubt about the legitimity of such a small resolution picture as personal work CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:37, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 02:39, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: doubt about the legitimity of a selfie as personal work CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:38, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 02:39, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: doubt about the legitimity of such a small resolution picture as personal work CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:39, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 02:39, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:CUR Australia

A1Cafel (talk) 04:36, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete 2019 coin. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 13:55, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nomination. -- CptViraj (talk) 06:34, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Datos erróneos. Maxi-carp-99 (talk) 15:17, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: missing essential info. --P 1 9 9   13:00, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wunsch der Porträtierten und des Hochladers Pimpinellus((D)) • WikiMUC08:38, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ra'ike T C 14:34, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is A selfie SierraTangoCharlie1 (talk) 22:25, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by principle, photo of two people eating the thing can be useful, but the photo is taken from above and people are looking up. This is unnatural and I delete the photo due to missing educational value. In addition, the thing they are eating is unidentified. Taivo (talk) 08:26, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Blurry SierraTangoCharlie1 (talk) 22:27, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, photo is taken through car front glass, it's raining, glass is wet and it's difficult to see through it. Deleted due to bad quality. Taivo (talk) 08:34, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Alternative Pain as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Published image without permission from the author. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:34, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, own work, depicted person is notable. Taivo (talk) 08:51, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mistake Qfabsar (talk) 09:56, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per G7 --Satdeep Gill (talk) 10:25, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Would have been eligible for speedy deletion per COM:CSD#G7 at the time of nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 15:24, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Qfabsar (talk) 09:57, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per G7 --Satdeep Gill (talk) 10:25, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Would have been eligible for speedy deletion per COM:CSD#G7 at the time of nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 15:24, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pixabay's CC0 license was removed since January 2019, image published after that are not accepted on Commons A1Cafel (talk) 03:37, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:53, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:CUR Australia A1Cafel (talk) 04:23, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:52, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:25, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:51, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in the United States for 3D sculptures. Subject is a 2011 work by Nancy Rubins who is still alive. Needs her permission via COM:OTRS. Howhontanozaz (talk) 09:48, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:51, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is no longer needed, I uploaded it in order to back something up on a page, however this file is no longer used and thus no longer needed. Maurice Oly (talk) 10:04, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:50, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: logo from a Twitch channel. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:26, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS mail has been requested. --What color are you, Sibyl System? 07:17, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Deleted by Fitindia. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:50, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although this image appears on a US government website, it isn’t a US government image. The copyright belongs to photographer Tom Pich of http://tompich.com and is clearly labelled as Pich’s work in this uncropped version on the NEA website at https://www.arts.gov/honors/jazz/nat-hentoff Rrburke (talk) 10:49, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:49, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Kai3952 as no permission (No permission since) Reke (talk) 11:01, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The file has been kept once, all photo from Memorybank2019 are under CC-BY-SA. Please see the discussion before.--Reke (talk) 11:05, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:49, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's His Childhood Photo, Will Upload New Photo. Sanjay S Yadav (talk) 11:07, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: By courtesy and per self-promotion. --Achim (talk) 19:46, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:48, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:印度馬德里印度門240.jpg SierraTangoCharlie1 (talk) 13:54, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:48, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:印度馬德里印度門240.jpg SierraTangoCharlie1 (talk) 13:54, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:48, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:印度馬德里印度門240.jpg SierraTangoCharlie1 (talk) 13:55, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:48, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:印度馬德里印度門222.jpg SierraTangoCharlie1 (talk) 13:57, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:48, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurred image. SierraTangoCharlie1 (talk) 13:59, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:48, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry Image SierraTangoCharlie1 (talk) 14:00, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:48, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:印度馬德里印度門233.jpg SierraTangoCharlie1 (talk) 14:01, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:48, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio Lijn 45 (talk) 14:12, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:48, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:印度馬德里印度門223.jpg SierraTangoCharlie1 (talk) 14:19, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:47, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to Ticket:2021042910008909 this image has been taken from a private road (51.50208N, 7.17132E) and not from public ground. The proprietor requests to remove the file. Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 14:20, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Used in several Wikimedia projects. Thuresson (talk) 12:44, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. I searched by the data given on Google Earth and the uploader tagged the building, not the driveway. There is no indication this wasn't taken from the public street. The driveway is as straight as a ruler and this could easily be taken from the street. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:47, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo was published in https://furiavinotintofv.foroactivo.com/t376p3-la-tribu-los-caribes-de-anzoategui since 2007. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 14:23, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:45, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

author's website says that : "Tale materiale non può essere copiato, riprodotto, ripubblicato, e distribuito in qualunque forma, anche solo parzialmente, senza l’autorizzazione di Giuseppe Quattrociocchi." 80.215.234.34 14:33, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Per nom : the file can indeed be found on the said copyrighted website : https://www.gqaraldica.it/stemmi-episcopali/. Kathisma (talk) 15:46, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:45, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andy223228 (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of Commons:Project scope: what new could be added to existing collection of explicit materials?

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:45, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Johnmtheory (talk · contribs)

edit

Both uploads show signs of Commons:License laundering. Used only in spam pages on en.wp

MER-C 15:20, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:45, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Samawas97 (talk · contribs)

edit

FBMD in metadata. Unlikely to be own work. Copyvio? Correct permission is required See COM:OTRS

Timtrent (talk) 15:23, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:44, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

lower-resolution version of File:Pierre Antoine Berrurier 1930 in Djebel Druze territory.jpg vip (talk) 16:37, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:44, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

replaced by https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jan_Christiaan_van_Wijk_(1844-1891).jpg much higher resolution and with the correct information Gouwenaar (talk) 19:49, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:44, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:CUR Austria A1Cafel (talk) 04:27, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 08:36, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:CUR Austria A1Cafel (talk) 04:27, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 08:36, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:CUR Austria A1Cafel (talk) 04:27, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 08:37, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:CUR Austria, currencies of Austria are copyrighted unless they have been published for 70 years.

A1Cafel (talk) 04:31, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Commemorative coins of Austria. --Materialscientist (talk) 08:35, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:CUR Austria, currencies of Austria are copyrighted unless they have been published for 70 years.

A1Cafel (talk) 04:45, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No. This has to be decided on a case-by-case basis. For deletion, it has to be shown that (1) threshold of originality is exceeded and (2) the artist died less than 70 years ago. For example, File:100 Schilling 1977 III Münze Hall.jpg shows a coin from the 15th century. For sure the artist has been dead for more than 70 years. --Luftschiffhafen (talk) 22:30, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Threshold of originality is exceeded in every single case. The example you mentioned is a derivative work but not a simple copy of the original so the derivative work is a protected work itself.--Chianti (talk) 19:47, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No. The one in your link is not the original, but a different coin (the "Haller Taler" from 1486). --Luftschiffhafen (talk) 22:55, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. Per nom and per U:Chianti : even if these are reinterpretations of older coins, these are still derivative works, not exact copies (moulded on the orgiginals) the charge of the evidence lies to the uploader so if some are indeed free design, you must individually prove your point. Kathisma (talk) 15:49, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per comments; as to originality, all "reproduced" coins are not copies, and contain new copyrightable elements. --Materialscientist (talk) 08:30, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:CUR Austria, currencies of Austria are copyrighted unless they have been published for 70 years.

A1Cafel (talk) 04:52, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:AUT007.JPG It's from 1947. 1947 70 = 2017. 2021 > 2017. I could be wrong, of course, but I think that one should survive. B25es (talk) 07:14, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Commemorative coins of Austria. --Materialscientist (talk) 08:32, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no FoP in Azerbaijan rubin16 (talk) 18:43, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 09:18, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Open Parliament Licence does not cover these recordings. Robin S. Taylor (talk) 20:41, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per comments. --Materialscientist (talk) 09:17, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Open Parliament Licence does not cover these recordings. Robin S. Taylor (talk) 20:42, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per comments. --Materialscientist (talk) 09:17, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Open Parliament Licence does not cover these recordings. Robin S. Taylor (talk) 20:42, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per comments. --Materialscientist (talk) 09:16, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Open Parliament Licence does not cover these recordings. Robin S. Taylor (talk) 20:43, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per comments. --Materialscientist (talk) 09:16, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an assemblage sculpture (according to the plate description), created by Andrew Alto de Guzman in 2016. There is no freedom of panorama in the Philippines yet. Unsure also if this exhibit is permanent or temporary. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:18, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 15:00, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files Football Trophy

edit

per COM:UA; all files listed here are violations of two-dimensional representations of 3D objects, protected by authors/designers. This topic has already been widely discussed, but they always reload such files.

Conde Edmond Dantès (talk) 00:39, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 14:26, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files about Ryan Vasquez

edit

Files (and article and category) are out from project scope, unlikely to be own work and of low resolution, all of them uploaded by a probably single-purpose account. --·×ald·es 03:49, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The single image gallery named above has been deleted -- single image galleries are not allowed. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:30, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. ·×ald·es 08:27, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 14:27, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:CUR Australia A1Cafel (talk) 04:21, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 14:28, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:CUR Australia A1Cafel (talk) 04:21, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 14:41, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

without sources José MG do Caixão (talk) 04:41, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Assuming good faith that User:Otávio Astor Vaz Costa created the map. --Missvain (talk) 20:13, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

without sources José MG do Caixão (talk) 04:42, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Assuming good faith that User:Otávio Astor Vaz Costa created the map. --Missvain (talk) 20:13, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

without sources José MG do Caixão (talk) 04:43, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Assuming good faith that User:Otávio Astor Vaz Costa created the map. --Missvain (talk) 20:13, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

without sources José MG do Caixão (talk) 04:43, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:15, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

without sources. Copy of my drawings José MG do Caixão (talk) 04:44, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:16, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

without sources. Copy of my drawings José MG do Caixão (talk) 04:44, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:16, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

without sources. José MG do Caixão (talk) 04:45, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:17, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

without sources. José MG do Caixão (talk) 04:45, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:17, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

without sources. Copy of my drawings José MG do Caixão (talk) 04:46, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:17, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While "PD-looking", this is a contemporary sculpture called Caragargoyle, created by Arnel Garcia in 2014. There is no freedom of panorama in the Philippines. Unsure if this is permanently or temporarily-exhibited. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:11, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also: File:9341SM Center Pulilan 36.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:12, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:25, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This sculpture is by Mario Dayo who is apparently still alive, and dated 2007. There is no freedom of panorama in the Philippines, and it is not sure if this work is on permanent display or not. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:22, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:25, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died n 1993, no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 09:19, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:27, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused file that is not understandable as titles for the columns are missing - no source, so no reliable information - and a bad screenshot showing some grammar problems Albinfo (talk) 09:37, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

it can get deleted - i downloaded the wrong image TedQ06 (talk) 12:25, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:27, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative from https://www.maenner.media/regional/hinnerk/wie-politisch-geht-schlager-hubertus-borck/ No indication for CC licence. GeorgHHtalk   09:41, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:27, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative from https://www.maenner.media/kultur/interview-bo-doerek No indication for CC license. GeorgHHtalk   09:47, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:27, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Georgia A1Cafel (talk) 09:51, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:27, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pure spam, used in multiple spam postings on en-wiki. Probably a copyright violation too (see https://www.deccanchronicle.com/lifestyle/viral-and-trending/050418/a-yen-for-all-things-cultural.html) Jimfbleak (talk) 10:05, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:27, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in the copyright law of the Philippines, and this freely-licensed image violates Architect Roger Villarosa's copyright on his building (still alive architect who designed this building). See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:GMA Network Center (which is still open though). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:17, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:28, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Thuggett (talk · contribs) has problems with copyright (look user talk page). The photo was created before 1991 and maybe even before WWII. Own work is unlikely. Real author and better license are needed. Taivo (talk) 10:22, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:28, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Logo from a Twitch channel CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:22, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:28, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong license, no source, non-official Logo Nick-4711 (talk) 13:21, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:31, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unknown, unused 4nn1l2 (talk) 14:14, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:31, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:39, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Timtrent (talk) 15:31, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:41, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not in the Public domain, no OTRS release; I really dislike this action though. Mateus2019 (talk) 18:56, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:41, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:WEBHOST: personal image with no claim to notability EpicPupper (talk) 20:12, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:41, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a two-dimensional representation of a copyrighted sculpture, statue or any other three-dimensional work of art. As such it is a derivative work of art, and per US Copyright Act of 1976, § 106(2) whoever holds copyright of the original has the exclusive right to authorize derivative works. We have a free license for the image, but not for the copyrighted model in the image. BigrTex (talk) 22:17, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:42, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a two-dimensional representation of a copyrighted sculpture, statue or any other three-dimensional work of art. As such it is a derivative work of art, and per US Copyright Act of 1976, § 106(2) whoever holds copyright of the original has the exclusive right to authorize derivative works. We have a free license for the image, but not for the copyrighted model in the image. BigrTex (talk) 22:17, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:42, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a two-dimensional representation of a copyrighted sculpture, statue or any other three-dimensional work of art. As such it is a derivative work of art, and per US Copyright Act of 1976, § 106(2) whoever holds copyright of the original has the exclusive right to authorize derivative works. We have a free license for the image, but not for the copyrighted model in the image. BigrTex (talk) 22:18, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:42, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. The file is not claimed own work, probably copyright violation. OTRS-permission from photographer (not from uploader or depicted person) is needed. Taivo (talk) 13:02, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 11:30, 7 June 2021 UTC: No permission since 30 May 2021 --Krdbot 19:50, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly the copyright owner is other person. [3] I propose it will be deleted. Uncitoyen (talk) 15:16, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 11:30, 7 June 2021 UTC: No permission since 30 May 2021 --Krdbot 19:50, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pixabay's CC0 license was removed since January 2019, image published after that are not accepted on Commons A1Cafel (talk) 03:37, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Not the best legal drafting I have seen, but it differentiates between using an image, perhaps in an ad, which is permitted, and selling the image for use by the buyer. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:53, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation; stained glass windwos are contemporary artworks; no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 09:15, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep de minimis Certainly for 039, although it's closer for 07.
I'm more concerned as to why you are, once again, trawling this editor's uploads to find marginal things to delete (just see User talk:Ies), yet you're seemingly unconcerned about File:Kalkar Nicolai Fenster1.JPG which is a clear photo focussed on the same stained glass, but from a different source. Please focus on the content, not individuals. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:42, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
File:Kalkar Nicolai Fenster1.JPG has OTRS-permission... --Martin Sg. (talk) 16:56, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - certainly not de minimis. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:55, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Boussagues maison du bailly.JPG Espinouse (talk) 09:37, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:57, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Église de boussagues.JPG Espinouse (talk) 09:38, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:57, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Boussagues vue generale.jpg Espinouse (talk) 09:40, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:57, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Boussagues Bailli.jpg Espinouse (talk) 09:41, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:57, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted artwork A1Cafel (talk) 03:39, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: personal art is out of scope. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:03, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All content from the source site is under copyright. Culex (talk) 11:24, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:06, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ik bezit de rechten niet voor deze foto en het is een lelijke foto Ahospers (talk) 11:02, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 11:30, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ik bezit de rechten niet voor deze foto en het is een lelijke foto Ahospers (talk) 11:02, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 11:30, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ik bezit de rechten niet voor deze foto en het is een lelijke foto Ahospers (talk) 11:03, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 11:30, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ik bezit de rechten niet voor deze foto en het is een lelijke foto Ahospers (talk) 11:03, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 11:31, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found elsewhere online at https://twitter.com/Yconik/status/1324544778592260102; image is unlikely to be the uploader's own work. Nathan2055talk - contribs 20:39, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I understand the picture can be found in Yconik’s Twitter account. I provided and approved the usage of the picture to Yconik’s team, which is Alex Carrillo’s PR management. The picture was taken on my iPhone in Alex Carrillo’s book release date back on October 6th, 2020, and uploaded by Yconik back on November 2020. I understand that pictures must have a free commons license to use them in Wikipedia, I wouldn’t have uploaded the picture if I didn’t own it. Is there a way to prove I took the picture? Thank you for your time. Best, Maru Morales. MaruuuMoralestalk - contribs 17:31, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per comments. --Materialscientist (talk) 11:29, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Իշխանություն ֆիլմ.jpg POitor (talk) 21:15, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: already taken care of. --Materialscientist (talk) 11:36, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bitte löschen Sie diese Datei. ich bin die Urheberin. 95.91.97.32 08:18, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Seems not to be Caroline Thiele, the actor. --Sanandros (talk) 21:05, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation; stained glass windwos are contemporary artworks; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 09:13, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep per COM:DM. Only background and incomplete.--Chianti (talk) 19:52, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Chianti. --Sanandros (talk) 21:06, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All previously published files must have evidence of free publication, for example OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 09:06, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   13:34, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obstructed Version of Subject at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:印度馬德里印度門154.jpg SierraTangoCharlie1 (talk) 14:59, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   13:39, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User uploaded two other files which seem to be stolen. Google's reverse image search comes up with different versions of this photo but I am not able to locate the original. I find it unlikely that this is the uploader's own work. Boylarva99 (talk) 20:53, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Unreliable uploader. --P 1 9 9   13:35, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not the uploader's own work, but the original seems to be lost. [4] Boylarva99 (talk) 16:41, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment what about other uploads of the same Userː https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:ListFiles/Debayan2001 (also low resolution, no exif etc.) ? --Oo91 (talk) 20:46, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: unsufficient reason for deletion, not found using Google Images with date prior to upload here. --P 1 9 9   13:39, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Under copyright until 2064 (Doisneau died in 1994). Culex (talk) 11:21, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 13:06, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation; stained glass windwos are contemporary artworks; no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 09:11, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The deletion request is too sweeping, please name the artist to check if the protection period still exists. --Berthold Werner (talk) 18:42, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Why “no freedom of panorama.”? They are on permanent public display. --Zenwort (talk) 14:24, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep. The church dates from the 1860s. Barring evidence to the contrary, one should assume that any permanent architectural components also date from that period unless evidence is presented to the contrary (and I have seen no such evidence). That would make this {{PD-old-assumed}}. IronGargoyle (talk) 12:50, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: two because the windows are de minimis there and not the main focus of the photo (the five statues are), deleted the others because the three-window group is by de:Karl-Martin Hartmann, who is still alive, and the other one was apparently installed in the period 1953 to 1962, which means it cannot be in the PD. There is no freedom of panorama inside buildings in Germany. --Rosenzweig τ 12:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope no 5.75.92.32 10:39, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In use, so not OOS. --Achim (talk) 19:43, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
0:38 video https://twitter.com/Jokernejad/status/1388892086783647747 5.75.7.212 09:46, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 11:42, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]