Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/06/27

Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Year	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2004	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2005	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2006	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2007	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2008	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2009	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2010	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2011	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2012	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2013	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12

Year	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2014	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2015	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2016	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2017	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2018	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2019	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2020	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2021	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2022	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2023	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2024	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12

Archive June 27^th, 2020

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2013 10 Evazu stavkarasts (3).jpg

{{Duplicate|Ēvažu_stāvkrasts_-_panoramio.jpg|later upload}} Dāvis Kļaviņš (talk) 17:12, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 18:39, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Arjen robben maakt rentree als voetballer bij FC Groningen.jpg

probably no own work - photo is used by dozens of websites Velocitas (talk) 17:48, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See https://www.fcgroningen.nl/mediadepot/3192500d62330/800/1200/VoorzijdeStoer.jpg, which is larger. --85.148.244.121 17:54, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: speedily, obvious copyvio. --Achim (talk) 18:19, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cyclistsgasworks.jpg

full naked version was not meant to be shown RaggamuffinLaLaLa (talk) 18:47, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 19:04, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Katya Sambuca HTMLAudioElement.jpg

Almost explicitly pornographic picture. Cannot say that woman is not nude. 2605:8D80:5A0:65CC:BDAD:8E82:DDBF:E304 15:06, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: No valid reason for deletion. In use. --Achim (talk) 15:23, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:40, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Katya Sambuca HTMLAudioElement.jpg

Cos I demand a gallon of TITTY MILK every day! Hey @Achim55 and Tm: lend me your Momma's Whale-Tit-Pumps! 2A04:4A43:4C7F:AE6D:EDD8:D4D6:5865:6F80 18:23, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Vandalism by a kid or a retarded from the UK. --Achim (talk) 18:47, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ErosPyramide20090221 243.jpg

Not educationally useful Fixpol (talk) 13:40, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep immediately. Fixpol seems unaware that Commons is not censored and can also illustrate adult topics such as sexuality or eroticism. So the deletion requests s/he launched are probably all invalid and abusive. See Commons:Project scope (and particularly COM:CENSORSHIP) and Commons:Sexual content. Also note that s/he should have launch a mass DR instead of a separate DR for each file. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 14:02, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per TwoWings. Green Giant (talk) 15:31, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ErosPyramide20090221 243.jpg

What exactly is educational about this photo? I wish uploaders had to explain the education use for each one rather than just uploading hundreds of soft porn pics. 2A04:4A43:4C7F:A7DC:A458:D936:1FAD:D4C2 00:50, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Blocked anonymous vandal, that opens invalid deletion requests, was blocked a few days ago with IP 2A02:C7D:3C1A:7300:9CDC:793:5A8B:1702, but now is back under IP 2A04:4A43:4C7F:A7DC:A458:D936:1FAD:D4C2 opening dozens of deletion requests as vandalism, in some using sexually vulgar and demeaning sexist language and in others accusing Commons of having porn (in contradiction to each other). Also not valid reason to delete. Tm (talk) 01:39, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No valid reason for nomination. — Huntster (t @ c) 01:55, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hogtie suspension bondage.jpg

No indication of model release Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:46, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It's quite obvious that release was intended, it's from a website that posts hundreds of these types of photos, from paid models (http://www.aussieropeworks.com/modelling.htm). Handcuffed (talk) 21:07, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As per Handcuffed and this image is clearly a staged image by a professional photograph, on an elaborated setting and stage in a studio with a clearly professional model taht is clearly possing for the camera, so there is clear model release. Also inst this one of those "I dont like this (nude) image so delete it"? ALSO DID YOU SEE THAT THIS IMAGE AS AN OTRS TICKET ASSOCIATED WITH IT THAT MIGHT HAVE A MODEL RELEASE. DID YOU EVEN TRIED TO CONTACT SOMEONE FROM OTRS TEAM?. Tm (talk) 15:49, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn, pending confrimation of the OTRS Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:31, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 00:50, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Union Confederate Monument, Union Cemetery, Kansas City, Missouri.jpg

Tiny erection! Muhahaha! 2A04:4A43:4C7F:A7DC:A458:D936:1FAD:D4C2 23:54, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No valid reason for deletion. — Huntster (t @ c) 01:26, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Raashitamilinterview.png

No evidence of a Creative Commons license on the image's page or the photographer's Instagram 24.245.70.140 16:19, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:59, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Scene from Trailer filmed on Victoria Street in Edinburgh, Scotland.jpg

Copyrighted image Christian Bolz (talk) 08:07, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ju Ta 14:23, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Memorial stupa of diamond bridge stampede 2010.jpg

No freedom of panorama in Cambodia A1Cafel (talk) 08:42, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, speedied, as uploader also requested deletion. --Túrelio (talk) 18:40, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Smits M.jpg

Om persoonlijke redenen. Hij is naaste familie en geen publiek bezit! Abigaïl47 (talk) 18:28, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: No valid reason, in use. --Achim (talk) 19:16, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: No valid reason. Foto van ± 1875 Lidewij (talk) 06:40, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Luitenant-ter-zee 2e klasse Michiel Smits (1852-1882) (Ridder Militaire Willems-Orde 1875) verdronk bij de scheepsramp met de Zr.Ms. Adder. De 29 jarige Smits was bij zijn overlijden ongehuwd. Akte BS . Dit portret is opgenomen in het boek van P.H.K. van Schendel, De Nederlandsche Ridderorden. P. H. K. van Schendel. De Militaire Willemsorde (Verzameling portretten van ridders). Edam 1891. Door de leeftijd van foto zit deze binnen het publieke domein.

Abigaïl47, u noemt de ongehuwd overleden Michiel Smits naaste familie. Verre familie is hier een betere term. Mvg, Lidewij (talk) 06:40, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lidewij ook mensen zonder kinderen hebben naaste familie! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abigaïl47 (talk • contribs) 19:43, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ja zeker, en dat was in dit geval meer dan een eeuw geleden. Met vriendelijke groet, Lidewij (talk) 20:16, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dat een foto public domain is, moet je niet opvatten als "de afgebeelde persoon was publiek bezit". Het betekent enkel dat er op de afbeelding geen rechten meer zitten. Dat is-en-blijft zo, en de afbeelding hoeft daarom ook niet verwijderd te worden. Edoderoo (talk) 18:16, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Michiel Smits is de broer van mijn overgrootvader. Wij hebben een kleine familie. Voor de foto in het boek over de MWO is toestemming gevraagd, die hebben ze gegeven, maar dat ging niet van harte. Mijn betovergrootouders dachten dat het boek op een dag verouderd zou zijn en in de vergetelheid zou raken, dus dat het van tijdelijke aard zou zijn en slechts voor de liefhebber. Ook koste het boek geld. Hij zou dan tussen andere staan die ook een MWO hebben. Niemand wist toen dat er ooit een internet zou komen. Als hij gewoon oud was geworden met een gezin dan was het misschien geen probleem geweest. Maar omdat hij bij een ramp is omgekomen ligt dit allemaal veel gevoeliger. Denk je eens in dat er een galerij met foto `s van de overledenen van de MH17 ramp zou zijn. Iedereen begrijpt dat dat niet kan voor de nabestaanden ook niet over 100 jaar. Dat is bij de ramp met de Adder niet anders. Hierbij vraag ik om mijn gevoelens en die van mijn familie te respecteren en de file te verwijderen van commonswiki.

Kept, no valid reason to delete this public domain image, - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 19:38, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Smits M.jpg

Om persoonlijke redenen. Hij is naaste familie en geen publiek bezit! Abigaïl47 (talk) 08:54, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Beste Abigaïl47, om in herhaling te vallen heeft geen enkele zin.

Om de Adder te gedenken is een andere foto van deze M. Smits gebruikt. In literatuur over de Titanic staan ook foto's. Ik zou niet weten waarom er op een moment geen gedenkboek over de MH17 met foto's zou kunnen verschijnen. De privacywet gaat over levende personen. Groet, Lidewij (talk) 14:10, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wat is het belang van Lidewij? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abigaïl47 (talk • contribs) 08:15, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Er is geen ander foto van Michiel Smits gebruikt in het artikel over de ramp met de Adder. Controleer dit gerust op de wikipedia pagina hierover. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abigaïl47 (talk • contribs) 08:26, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Er zijn genoeg zwaarwegende redenen te bedenken om geen foto`s te publiceren van geliefde personen na hun overlijden in het publieke domein. Volgens mij kan Lidewij dat zelf ook wel bedenken. Misschien kent ze zelf wel een geliefd overleden persoon waarvan ze geen foto`s op het internet heeft gepubliceerd en ook niet wil gaan doen om de juiste redenen. Anders kent ze misschien mensen in haar omgeving die haar dit kunnen uitleggen.

Mensen hebben het recht om vergeten te worden, ook op het internet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abigaïl47 (talk • contribs) 11:33, 28 June 2020 (UTC) Gelukkig zijn er weinig mensen geïnteresseerd in een gesprek over mijn overleden familielid.[reply]

Wat is het algemeen belang dat Michiel Smits wordt vermeld op deze pagina? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abigaïl47 (talk • contribs) 13:30, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Menke graag je reactie! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abigaïl47 (talk • contribs) 11:09, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Menke is niet meer actief op Commons en Wikipedia. Lidewij (talk) 13:32, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Abigaïl47, mijn hobby is genealogie en geschiedenis. Ik ben hier actief omdat ik voor vrije kennis en documentatie ben. Als genealoog ben ik juist actief, zodat mensen niet vergeten zullen worden. Binnen onze familie worden oa. oude foto's aan het archief gegeven. Het artikel over de Adder staat op mijn volglijst, alle wijzigingen komen bij mij langs. De foto van Michiel Smits (1852-1882) is hier opgenomen omdat hij op 22 jarige leeftijd de Ridder Militaire Willems-Orde kreeg en daarom was opgenomen in het boek van P.H.K. van Schendel, De Nederlandsche Ridderorden. 1891. Mvg, Lidewij (talk) 13:32, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wie beheerd deze pagina dan?Abigaïl47 (talk) 13:36, 28 June 2020 (UTC) Lidewij kan jij het je voorstellen dat ik het niet fijn vind dat jij met mijn familie omgaat?Abigaïl47 (talk) 13:38, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Abigaïl47, na het uploaden (het vrijgeven) behoord de foto aan de gemeenschap van Commons. De moderatoren beheren hier. Abigaïl47, ik kan het me juist niet voorstellen. Het gaat over een ver familielid. Wanneer het om directe familie, zoals een kind of ouder, zou gaan kan ik me er nog iets bij voorstellen. De foto zit en blijft in het publieke domein, of hij nu in Commens staat op niet. Mvg, Lidewij (talk) 14:15, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lidewij als jij het nou voor jouw familie doet, dan doe ik het voor mijn familie.Abigaïl47 (talk) 14:19, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wat moet ik voor mijn familie doen?

Wanneer er iets in het publieke domein staat of is, is er niets meer over te zeggen. Lidewij (talk) 14:37, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Abigaïl47, het is not done delen uit het overleg te verwijderen, nadat er op de onderdelen werd gereageerd. Lidewij (talk) 18:49, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept, no valid reason to delete this public domain image, (as above) - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 19:38, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Arun Singh Dhanadi 55.jpg

arun Arundhanadi (talk) 08:33, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Dyolf77 at 12:17, 28 Juni 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Arundhanadi --Krdbot 20:26, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Arun Singh Dhanadi 25.jpg

good Arundhanadi (talk) 08:34, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Dyolf77 at 12:18, 28 Juni 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Arundhanadi --Krdbot 20:26, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Miles (Bangladeshi Rock Band).jpg

copied from the internet. not copyright rights holder Dead.rabbit (talk) 18:07, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 14:36, 28 Juni 2020 UTC: Commons:Licensing: non-trivial logo --Krdbot 20:27, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Meghan Trainor in 2020.png

Possible copyright violation 107.201.37.75 22:32, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Are you okay? The picture is exactly 29 seconds into this video. Assume good faith next time and actually check the cited source before making bogus requests. Túrelio, this nomination may cause problems at the Trainor article's FAC on the English Wikipedia, can you please verify the image and close this?—MaranoFan (talk) 06:54, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion; speedy-kept; still is from CC-BY licensed video. --Túrelio (talk) 21:14, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Meghan Trainor in 2020.png

Copyright violation Germag2213 (talk) 22:19, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: The image was verified as being from a CC-BY licensed video less than two weeks ago. Not very familiar with the rules here on Commons but I'm closing this idiocy.--MaranoFan (talk) 10:38, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Carloprat.jpg

copyvio: https://www.quizzcreator.com/quiz/12881/carlo-pratic-quiz--bio-birthday-info-height-family Rennrigor (talk) 15:36, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Túrelio at 19:11, 28 Juni 2020 UTC: Copyright violation: https://www.quizzcreator.com/quiz/12881/carlo-pratic-quiz--bio-birthday-info-height-family --Krdbot 02:28, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Parandeye-aabi.png

RF/COpyright ahuR ☘ 21:03, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: poster. --4nn1l2 (talk) 03:26, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2013 10 Kolka (14).jpg

{{Duplicate|Kolkas_ragā_-_panoramio_(2).jpg|later upload}} Dāvis Kļaviņš (talk) 10:31, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted already and redirected as duplicate.--BevinKacon (talk) 18:43, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2013 10 Kolka (11).jpg

{{Duplicate|Kolkas_ragā_-_panoramio_(1).jpg|later upload}} Dāvis Kļaviņš (talk) 10:33, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted already and redirected as duplicate.--BevinKacon (talk) 18:42, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2013 10 Kolka (24).jpg

{{Duplicate|Kolkas_ragā_-_panoramio_(3).jpg|later upload}} Dāvis Kļaviņš (talk) 10:37, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted already and redirected as duplicate.--BevinKacon (talk) 18:43, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2013 10 Kolka (30).jpg

{{Duplicate|Kolkas_ragā_-_panoramio_(4).jpg|laterupload}} Dāvis Kļaviņš (talk) 10:38, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted already and redirected as duplicate.--BevinKacon (talk) 18:43, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mark Titus Interview.jpg

Clearly a screen shot of a copyrighted TV broadcast 24.117.19.153 02:48, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Speedied as obvious copyvio, screenshot of broadcast. JGHowes ^talk 00:33, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SSBInfographic.png

Unambiguous copyright violation, image copied from http://www.ssbforum.org/index.html J. M. (talk) 16:56, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by JuTa at 21:07, 30 Juni 2020 UTC: No license since 2020-06-17. For more information read the introduction of COM:L, about essential information and about [[COM:CB#Internet_images|Interne --Krdbot 02:24, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pirogov AS - 02.jpg

no evidence of CC licence claimed PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:36, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 12:52, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Syed-Shahzaib-Haider The-Dayspring.jpg

A person of no notability. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 03:17, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 04:39, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Syed Shahzaib.jpg

A person of no notability. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 03:18, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 04:39, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:At Assembly.1.jpg

A person of no notability. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 03:19, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 04:39, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SomedayMyLove (talk · contribs)

Doubtful sources of images. The person on the photos died in 1997. Information about the initial publication of some images is not available.

Maxinvestigator (talk) 05:04, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 03:44, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SomedayMyLove (talk · contribs)

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 22:12, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for File:GuidoFatherAdrianaCaselotti.jpg which is PD-Italy with only 20 years protection. --RAN (talk) 12:22, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept, but one is deleted. If Santa Ana Muriel is 19 years old on the photo, then it is made in 1999. Source country Argentina demands 25 years from creation plus 20 years from publication. Even if 20 years from publication has probably passed, 25 years from creation has not. Taivo (talk) 09:40, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Lego sculptures at Legoland Deutschland

Artworks in non-public place. So, FoP in Germany does not apply. See also Com:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Legoland Deutschland and Com:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Miniland (Legoland Deutschland).

Yuraily Lic (talk) 18:01, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

support deletion - thanks for the reasoning and examples. Cheers, Mliu92 (talk) 21:37, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for understanding, Mliu92. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 17:30, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 05:13, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Lego sculptures at Legoland Deutschland

Artworks in non-public place. So, FoP in Germany does not apply.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 08:14, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support deletion per above reasoning. Cheers, Mliu92 (talk) 17:09, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 03:42, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Melvindillinger (talk · contribs)

All their images are taken from non free websites and the web in general

Gbawden (talk) 11:32, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 03:41, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bolunia (talk · contribs)

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 03:39, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alexander Mikhalenko (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 03:24, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Justinburrows7 (talk · contribs)

Eneliko Smith seems to be not notable person. Commons is not private media repository.

Estopedist1 (talk) 19:36, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 03:45, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 莫 (talk · contribs)

No meta data, low resolution, no permissions.

Larryasou (talk) 05:46, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 04:40, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ahmed AL-Gaafry.jpg

Personal image/ Out of scope Harsh 2580 (talk) 02:39, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Used on a userpage but look at his contributions... E4024 (talk) 04:11, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 14:07, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:20190728 151652.jpg.jpg

A person of no notability. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 02:50, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 14:07, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Abdullah Ahmed Bin Akhtar.jpg

A person of no notability. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 02:51, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 14:07, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rex Factorem.jpg

A person of no notability. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 02:52, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 14:08, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:15820664387365-e1583234497122.png

Does not convince me to be an own work and am not sure of scope either. E4024 (talk) 03:15, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete derivative work but does not cite original source. Questionable scope. — BriefEdits (talk) 03:35, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 14:08, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Peoplebook (talk · contribs)

unused, uncategorized, per Google search probably out of scope.

Estopedist1 (talk) 08:32, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 14:09, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rubesongs (talk · contribs)

Author ALAN BUERGENTHAL in exif, needs permission

Gbawden (talk) 11:02, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 14:09, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rm.jpeg

unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not private media repository. Only (remaining) uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 11:47, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 14:10, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Thula victorious at her best again.jpg

Out of scope: Without further info, this is just a woman in a doorway of no educational value. Google search indicates Wikipedia had the same issue and ended up deleting the page Headlock0225 (talk) 12:10, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 14:10, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Palak Sindhwani.jpg

out of scope. Quakewoody (talk) 12:55, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyvio. --Érico (talk) 14:13, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Liks1996 (talk · contribs)

unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope.

Estopedist1 (talk) 13:39, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 14:18, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo chierichetti rovenna.png

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:55, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 14:19, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Equipe de Red Star FC Septembre 2015.png

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 14:20, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alvee2020 (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 14:20, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:AkashNanda.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 14:20, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rivxrv187 (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used or used in sandbox.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 14:20, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Aditya dwivedi.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 14:21, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Adarsh Aarav profile.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 14:21, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Adamu Bukar Ngalda.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 14:21, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:AbiNash Jha.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 14:21, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:"Gumdroplou".jpeg

Out of scope? BlinxTheKitty (talk) 18:37, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 14:21, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Saoirse351 (talk · contribs)

Out of COM:SCOPE: see Excluded educational content. These PDFs look to be drafts of a proposed Wikipedia article. --S.Hinakawa (talk) 19:23, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 14:22, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Paullumi B Mukheerjee.jpg

out of scope Adelfrank (talk) 23:31, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 14:24, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Yakimova.jpg

No indication of early enough publication to be PD PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:17, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept, point 1 of the license applies circa (1883 photo). Taivo (talk) 09:41, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Yakimova.jpg

No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be PD in country of origin (Russia) (no matter how old it is). Under Russian law even pre-1917 works must be published before the cutoff date, but there is no indication of that. Point one does not apply because it is not by a known credited author and confirmed to be published early enough. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:11, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Taivo, care to explain your rationale? Through w:Copyright law of the Russian Federation, I was able to find [1]. It doesn't seem to be the current law, but it's the most recent law I could find in English. In PDF file, it says that Copyright in a work first disclosed after the author's death shall subsist for 70 years after its disclosure. In other words, it seems that there are two requirements: the author must have been dead for at least 70 years, and the work must have been published at least 70 years ago. While the former is very likely for an 1883 work, we don't have evidence of the latter. A work could easily remain unpublished for centuries.

A requirement that photographs must have been published at least 70 years ago sounds really bad for us. Most uploaders find images in modern sources and have no clue if the photo has been published in a newspaper, on a postcard or somewhere else a century ago. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:25, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Commons has decided, that if we do not know anything about author, then 50 years is given for dying. That means: for circa 1883 photos death date of author is circa 1933. Now I read the license. Per license point 1 if author died before 1942, then the work is in public domain in Russia. "If the work was first published posthumously" – this applies only for repressed authors, whether they were later rehabilitated or not. If the author was not repressed, then 70 years from publication is not required. The repressions started after 1933. Taivo (talk) 16:23, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I read the linked PDF like this:

If the photographer has disclosed his identity (which we have no evidence of), then we must show that he has been dead for at least 70 years. For a few authors, this is extended to 74 years. For a work created in the 1880s, it is very likely that the author has been dead for at least 74 years, so I see no reason for further research of the death year. If the author hasn't disclosed his identity, then the author's death year is irrelevant for determining the copyright status.
Regardless of whether the author has disclosed his identity or not, the work is only in the public domain if it was published at least 70 years ago. We have no evidence that this was published more than 70 years ago. Presumably, there are almost no Russian files on Commons for which we have such evidence. I presume that we don't wish to delete 99% of all historical Russian files from Commons.
If the author went through the repression and rehabilitation process, then the year of death is replaced by a different year, but it looks as if this doesn't affect the publication requirement. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:35, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Russian law dictates that works by unknown authors must be published before the cutoff date - no matter when the author probably died. Copyright countdown begins upon publication date for posthumously published works by known authors. Russian law has very different rules for works by known authors and works by unknown authors, so we cannot just take point one for works by known authors and apply it to works of unknown authorship and unknown publication date. As for "Presumably, there are almost no Russian files on Commons for which we have such evidence." Unfortunately, those files will have to be deleted, no matter how many of them there are. A photo being of Russian origin should not be an exemption from providing proof of PD status in the country of origin (no matter how many Russian users wish that). We should instead purge the files that lack such information, replace them with fair-use photos on the Russian version of Wikipedia, and strive to find as many Russian PD photos as we can instead of deciding that because there are too many Russian files with problems that they should all be exempt from Commons rules. Having a high number of problematic files does not exempt such problematic files from being dealt with. Commons as rulings for assumptions safe to make for a known authors death dates, but they have no relevance when the probable death date of the author has no bearing on the copyright status (ie, Russian photos by uncredited authors)--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 18:28, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Taivo. E4024 (talk) 22:09, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
In some way, this issue with Russian law sounds like the usual problem with United States law. Someone could have made a painting during the mediæval, but then it remained unpublished for centuries until it was published for the first time in 1977 with a valid copyright notice, and then it's copyrighted in the United States until the end of 2072. It is usually impossible for us to show that an old painting is in the public domain in the United States, and for the same reason it's probably impossible to show that an old photograph is in the public domain in Russia. I note that we have not yet deleted all 19th century paintings from the United States. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:47, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep If it there is no proof it was published in Russia, then there is no proof Russia is the country of origin. On what basis is that law used? Really though, most works were made to be published. Assuming unpublished status without evidence, and deleting on that basis, is a problem I think. While it's possible it remained unpublished, that is an extreme theoretical doubt, nowhere near a significant doubt (the level required by COM:PCP), to me. Similarly, you can't prove it wasn't first published in another country -- so quite often even the country of origin is an assumption itself, and I have no problem assuming published status for most works, unless there is some concrete indication to the contrary (scan of negative from a photographer's archive, something like that). It sure looks like a scan from a publication, as well. It probably qualifies for {{PD-RusEmpire}}, but really, the odds this was actually unpublished are unimaginably small, and not something to delete over. Carl Lindberg (talk) 01:00, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Do you have any evidence for the claim that most works were made to be published? A lot of all photos out there are family photos which were not made to be published. If a person later becomes famous, people might dig up old family photos and publish them. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:07, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - It's always possible the sale of the photo from a photography studio to the family constituted publication itself, depending on the definitions -- anonymous terms don't often require strict publication, but just "making available to the public", a lesser standard, at least in the EU. In any event, this looks like a scan from a publication. If it looked like a family snapshot provided to a book author, it would rise closer to significant doubt and possibly over -- but to me there should be some evidence it was the type of work to remain private, since most did not. In the end, COM:PCP is for significant doubts, not throwing fairly extreme theoretical possibilities out there and deleting based on those. There are always going to be theoretical doubts -- this is copyright after all. Carl Lindberg (talk) 03:16, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Simply assuming an item must have been published long enough ago simply because it is old is not OK - Commons has ruled on this repeatedly. A SPECIFIC publication must be found to prove that an item was published early enough. There is no evidence of any sort that any country with more lenient copyright terms is the country of origin (ie, country of earliest publication), and the current source of the photo is a russian website, so it is safe to assess the photo for copyright status in Russia given the circumstances. There is no plausible reason to think that Russia is not the country of origin given the information at present.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 02:51, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- That is not true. In the end, per policy, it's a matter if it rises to a significant doubt. There are lots of times publication was assumed. We also often assume country of publication, as you just did above. There is no evidence to the contrary, so absolutely it's most reasonable to assume Russia is the country of origin. But you don't know for sure -- so we tend to go with the most reasonable assumption based on the evidence we have. This looks like a scan from an old publication -- there is no evidence whatsoever to indicate that this might have remained unpublished. To be under copyright, you are stating that the website owner obtained an unpublished photo under authorization of a copyright holder, with no evidence to support that -- it is far far more likely it was obtained from a long-ago published source. It sure looks like it. I'm sure some admins have deleted on such things in the past at times, but there have also been lots of keeps for stuff like this too. If there was some specific indication or reason to think it might have remained unpublished, then yes that can raise more significant doubts. It qualifies for {{PD-old-assumed}} really -- it's not a problem anywhere except *maybe* Russia, on technicalities of restored copyright. And even there, if not published within 70 years of the authors death, it's PD, which is what PD-old-assumed is about, so if it's still unpublished it should be PD. To me, the odds of this still being under copyright are infinitesimally small, and is not the sort of thing we should be deleting over. Carl Lindberg (talk) 03:16, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Official policy requires that publication information be provided when needed. We do have a large number of photos that wrongly lack evidence of early enough publication because of assumptions, but those photos are problematic too, and the burden of proof is on the uploader to prove that a photo is eligible for Commons rather than expecting others to share in their unprovable speculative assumptions.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:24, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    - Official policy requires that information be provided to support the license beyond a significant doubt. It does not require that hard evidence be supplied to counter every theoretical doubt that can be thrown up. You make an unprovable speculative assumption that Russia is the country of origin -- fine that makes sense, given the available evidence, as there is no indication to suggest otherwise. Yet you turn around and say others cannot do the same regarding publication. That is not policy. Russian law states that once 70 years pass after an author's death, an unpublished work becomes PD -- copyright does not last forever. The work in question easily qualifies for PD-old-assumed, which covers our assumed time of copyright maybe being viable, and matches that same period. To still be under copyright, it would have had to remain completely unpublished long after the author died (it is 17 years beyond our PD-old-assumed time), but then first legally made public within 70 years of that author's death, *and* that making public would have had to be less than 70 years ago. And you are providing no evidence to support that possibility, which is extraordinarily faint, yet you are suggesting we delete over it. To me, that is the essence of a theoretical doubt, requiring exquisite first publication timing, and is incredibly unlikely. It is not what we should be deleting over, and is not supported by policy. It's exactly how Commons gets the reputation of being deflationists. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:11, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral until I get a better sense of policy for what to do with recently-published works of unknown authorship. Personally, I would like to tag such files with a template stating that the publication history of the work is unknown or incomplete and act as a warning template for reusers, not unlike {{Not-free-US-FOP}}. {{Not-PD-US-URAA}} has a function that acts to that effect, but I feel the new tag would be a lot more clear and versatile for that purpose. This would have to be handled with a request for comment, though, particularly with respect to wording and application. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 17:52, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Couple of notes -- the EU anonymous 70-year period starts at "making available to the public", not "publication", which is a much lesser standard to obtain (public display counts as making available, though it isn't publication). EU law also states that works become PD 70 years after creation if not made available (with permission of the copyright holder) in that period. Russia does not seem to have that last clause, but does terminate copyright 70 years after an author's death if not made public by then. It would seem that {{PD-old-assumed}} would cover that latter period. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:11, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Russia is not a member of the EU. Date a photo was made available to the public and where must still be proven. There is no evidence that the item was first published in the EU over 70 years ago, and certainly not evidence it was published in the EU over 70 years before the URAA. You cannot assume something falls into a more lenient law just because you want it to. PD-old-assumed for works by known authors with unknown death dates (when we can assume that the author was dead by a certain year and start countdown from the assumed date). This has nothing to do with that - this is a work by an unknown author, and under Russian law, copyright countdown begins upon publication for works by unknown authors, REGARDLESS of how old the photo is or how likely it is the unknown photographer has been dead for 70 years - works by unknown authors get different treatment legally, and without finding an early enough publication date to satisfy legal obligations, this one will have to go. The clause about termination of copyright works unpublished for 70 years after an author's death ONLY applies to works by known authors with known dates of death. Laws about works by known authors are absolutely irrelevant to this situation and should not be brought up anymore!--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 17:25, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    - No, I was answering a more general question here. Correct that Russia does not have the EU notation of expiring 70 years from creation, however they do have a clause where unpublished works expire 70 years after the death of the author. And yes I think that still applies. So it's not the case that unpublished works have an infinite copyright there. It's usually the act of publication that makes something "anonymous", i.e. published with authorization but without naming an author, which is different than simply "unknown" (just the UK has clauses which explicitly deal with "unknown" I think). Russia has no explicit rules when the author is unknown, so we may need to wait for PD-old-assumed to be applicable, but it has for the work in question. Carl Lindberg (talk) 00:29, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm still curious about a) unpublished anonymous works (which many subpages of COM:CRT do not seem to list), b) any publication right applicable in the EU, and c) works that were never made publicly available in any sense. There's also the matter of American law and its terms of protection; apparently, according to Peter Hirtle, a 1755 letter written by John Adams (who died in 1826) was never published until 1956; because its copyright was renewed, the letter's copyright, under current law, will not expire until the start of 2052, 296 years and 3 months after it was written. Commons:Upload/Unknown author or license does say not to upload stuff where such information is unknown to the uploader, but seems to exclude stuff where the general public does not know (at the very least in terms of authorship). Sometimes, it may be a matter of "we didn't look hard enough", but I'd also favor conditionally keeping these ambiguous cases until we have knowledge that it is, in fact, infringing. Again, worth a RFC IMO. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 21:47, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Most countries these days have a clause where anonymous works are X years from publication, and if not published within those same X years, copyright expires. (Or rather, "made available to the public".) Russia does not have such a clause, as noted, and there are some other countries which deal with them differently (or don't specify that situation at all). Anonymous usually means published without naming an author; there are many here who argue that when the author is simply unknown, you can't use the anonymous terms -- usually we do like to see that something was actually published without a name (as opposed to having been omitted in later publications) in order to use those terms. Otherwise, you have to wait until PD-old-assumed is valid, 120 years from creation, I think (for 70pma countries), since even though you don't know who the author is, 70pma is still the term.
  - For b), that is true, the EU does have a publication right. That is valid I think for works which were not made available within 70 years of creation (for anonymous works) or 70pma (for known authors). If published before 70pma/70pd then there is no later publication right.
  - For c), yeah, the U.S. is complicated. Before 1978, authors had a "common law" copyright upon creation which potentially never expired. The federal copyright started (and common law copyright ended) upon publication (or registration with the Copyright Office), which lasted for 28 years and renewable to (eventually) 95. Thus, publication without notice both ended common law copyright and voided the federal copyright. (Federal copyright in most cases had much stronger protection than common law copyright, which was per state and only defined by precedent court cases.) Since 1978, which abolished common law copyright, there are limits. Anonymous and corporate works expire either 95 years from publication or 120 years from creation, whichever comes first. Unpublished works by known authors (if created or first published 1978 or later) expire at 70pma, period. Works created before 1978 but still unpublished as of that date, got 25 years to publish them (in which case they are still protected until at least 2048), otherwise they got the 70pma or 95/120 terms as of 2003. So a similar John Adams letter today would be public domain, since it expired in 2003. The one you mention however sounds like it's valid until 2052. Carl Lindberg (talk) 00:29, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    - "Unpublished works by known authors (if created or first published 1978 or later) expire at 70pma, period." This is not a US work. It must be PD in the country of origin. And as for "Most countries these days have a clause where anonymous works are X years from publication, and if not published within those same X years, copyright expires." Russia is not one of those countries where a photo with unknown authorship expires if it is unpublished after a certain amount of time (they have a clause like that for works by known authors with known dates of death, but NOT for unknown authors, and NOT for works by unknown authors when one can just "assume" how long the author was dead - works by unknown authors get a different category) ALL Russian works by unknown authors MUST be published at least 70 years ago to be PD in Russia, no matter how freaking old they may be. If the general public, the uploader, and Wikimedia Commons all can't satisfy that burden of proof to uphold the licencing standard on Commons, then it WILL have to be deleted.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 03:42, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      - I was discussing the general situation for U.S. works, not this one specifically -- that was a tangent. And Russian law has no specific terms for unknown authors -- only anonymous and pseudonymous. It's not definite those are the same things. Carl Lindberg (talk) 03:54, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: published in 1926 (or earlier), per File:Yakimova2.jpg. --Materialscientist (talk) 15:52, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sajjad abdollahzadeh.jpg

"[email protected]" : In scope? E4024 (talk) 01:22, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; out of project scope. See also: Commons:Deletion requests/File:سجاد عبداله زاده.jpg. --Ahmad^talk 18:44, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:سجاد عبداله زاده.jpg

I guess OoS. E4024 (talk) 01:25, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmad^talk 18:42, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:سعيد أبو علي.jpg

No permission أمين (talk) 07:24, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; possible copyvio. --Ahmad^talk 18:47, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:سعيد أبو علي.jpg

no permission أمين (talk) 10:27, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The "own work" claim sounds quite dubious to me. Can the uploader provide a copy with camera EXIF? --E4024 (talk) 17:00, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; possible copyvio. --Alaa :)..! 19:55, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:AlPheu Murrombe Move.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 19:13, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alexander Mikhalenko, 2014.jpg

and File:Alexander Mikhalenko.jpg
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 19:13, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:First Order Stormtroopers 1

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:22, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:39, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:First Order Stormtroopers 2

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:06, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:39, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:First Order Stormtroopers 3

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:21, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Taivo (talk) 11:44, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:First Order Stormtroopers 4

COM:DW of copyrighted characters.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:18, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 11:28, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:First Order Stormtroopers 5

COM:DW of copyrighted characters.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:59, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Fitindia (talk) 06:42, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:First Order Stormtroopers 6

COM:DW of copyrighted characters.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 16:56, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 19:14, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:First Order Stormtroopers 7

COM:DW of copyrighted characters. No FoP in France.

File:Stormtroopers à Paris.jpg

Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:26, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 04:11, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Image = Huey (Rapper).jpg

Very unlikely that this photo is licensed under Commons TaurusEmerald (talk) 03:48, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The available metadata suggests that this image is a screenshot credited to BlackSportsOnline, which published the image here. That link is clearly marked "Copyright © 2020 BlackSportsOnline LLC," which is incompatible with free licenses required of uploads to Commons. Since its publication by BlackSportsOnline, the image has been cropped and republished elsewhere. Vycl1994 (talk) 17:34, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:34, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Patrick Wisdom Texas Rangers.png

Copyright violation: https://www.foxsports.com/mlb/patrick-wisdom-player-matchups?teamId=13 99.106.146.30 21:04, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ju Ta 14:21, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:'Moonlight on the Arctic Ocean'- "The Jeannette is plowing the icy field; With a full cargo of the patent "Chest-Shield."" (IA 140035Jeannette).pdf

I am not sure this is PD-US-Gov. It looks like a commerical postcard/flier with an ad on the back. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:48, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Artist not identified. Note in metadata says - "Copyrighted 1882 by J.H. Bufford's Sons" A US publisher? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:50, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

J.H. Bufford's Sons did a range of nautical postcards, ref LoC. The longest any of the "sons" is on record as living to is 1912. The company would have been around Boston or New York.

Though PD-USGov does not apply, the normal US expired licenses can be used, both for the facing artwork and the reverse advertising.

This is probably in the library because of the relevance of the story of the USS Jeannette and the expedition, which would have been instantly recognizable to anyone living in the 1880s. --Fæ (talk) 11:22, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep

Resolved

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:07, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 15:52, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kaļķupītes klintis pie Puiša kalna pilskalna.jpg

{{Duplicate|Kaļķupītes_klintis_02.jpg|cropped version}} Dāvis Kļaviņš (talk) 15:31, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The crop has adequate difference that deserve an individual file. Apart from that, the brightness of these two photos are different. --A1Cafel (talk) 16:30, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: not a duplicate. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:03, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tones and I Tour 2020.png

The file will be deleted 2600:1702:10D1:4E0:38DD:B6EB:C9CA:3EAF 23:09, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep No valid reason? Tm (talk) 02:35, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:07, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tones and I Tour 2020 2.png

The file will be deleted. 99.203.128.232 13:24, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 14:07, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tones and I Tour 2020 2.png

Possible copyright violation 2600:1702:10D1:4E0:38DD:B6EB:C9CA:3EAF 23:10, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Proofs? Tm (talk) 02:35, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no evidence. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:04, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Valerie Bertinelli 1987.jpg

The file will be deleted. 99.203.128.232 13:22, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 14:06, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Valerie Bertinelli 1987.jpg

Possible copyright violation 2600:1702:10D1:4E0:38DD:B6EB:C9CA:3EAF 23:11, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Proofs? And this IP is opening deletion requests with invalid reasons. And account is a valid and know flickr account. Tm (talk) 02:35, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no evidence. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:04, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bobby Lee in "Pauly Shore's Vegas Is My Oyster".png

screenshot uploaded from YouTube owned by Pauly Shore -- Thats Just Great (talk) 23:29, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Hey Thats Just Great, the video's description box states that the video is licensed by thru the Creative Commons Attribution license which allows for "Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material". If you are Pauly Shore and have accidentally uploaded the video onto YouTube with that license, you may contact an administrator for a Commons:Courtesy deletions and afterward probably remove that clip from YouTube to avoid confusion. Thanks. — BriefEdits (talk) 01:15, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. I just assumed that the content was copyrighted by Pauly Shore. I didn't realize that he was allowing people to take "Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material." I wonder if Pauly Shore realizes that he didn't copyright it?-- Thats Just Great (talk) 02:00, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I agree that there is a slight chance that he may have messed up. But I guess unless he changes his mind, we can probably close this nomination thread. — BriefEdits (talk) 02:49, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: CC-BY. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:06, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Illus F6.jpg

unbrauchbar und Urheberrechtsverletzung Xocolatl (talk) 19:16, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, no permission, low quality photograph of pages from a magazine. --Achim (talk) 15:33, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Map of Kisenge.png

This is not a map, it's a screen shot from Google — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:07, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ju Ta 01:52, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Platform Train information display.JPG

a meaningless or ambiguous name Solomon203 (talk) 07:19, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Túrelio at 08:27, 12 Juli 2020 UTC: CSD G2 (unused and implausible, or broken redirect): Unused redirect --Krdbot 02:17, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:حلقية للمنظمة بالمنتدى المحلي في الجديدة.jpg

This image contains copyright,--عدنان حليم (talk) 13:16, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio (Facebook image). --Wdwd (talk) 11:00, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2006-2008 Kia Grand Carnival EX van.jpg

I uploaded this when I try to edit 2006-2008 Kia Grand Carnival (VQ) EX van 01.jpg with Photoshop. 18:30, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

@Fitindia: Please delete only this image. Alex Neman 09:00, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 06:46, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Challenger (Actor).jpg

Copied from the internet. Dead.rabbit (talk) 18:03, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ju Ta 08:36, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Saleh Ahmed.jpg

copied from the internet Dead.rabbit (talk) 18:04, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ju Ta 08:37, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:اكاديمية اطر الغد دورة المسؤولية.jpg

This image contains copyright, the owner: HAIGE IMAGE: HAIGE IMAGE--عدنان حليم (talk) 13:10, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, likely copyvio, screenshot and Facebook-code. --Túrelio (talk) 12:51, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Onur Taşcı.png

OoS amateur art. E4024 (talk) 01:57, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:17, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:BAP Aguirre CH-84.jpg

porque es borroso LOKI ZETA (talk) 01:58, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no permission. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:18, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vaajkhonyaa.png

Logo of a rap band; has copyright Huji (talk) 02:04, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:18, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:153484yhkkcsahl- 5$%8.png

"Ceraphone es un Poeta, Escritor, Rapero, Trovador y Dibujante nicaragüense." However he seems OoS and the file problematic. E4024 (talk) 03:13, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:20, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:100A0042.jpg

I think there is a rapper inside the darkness but as it is will not serve much. E4024 (talk) 03:17, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:21, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Union City Transit 650 Interior.jpg

Request by author Eti15TrSf (talk) 03:25, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep COM:INUSE --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:17, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: used and useful. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:23, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:VTA 930 Interior.jpg

Request by author Eti15TrSf (talk) 03:25, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep COM:INUSE --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:18, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: used and useful. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:23, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Other files uploaded by Johar67

Obviously not own work. Most of these are screenshots, just as those in Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Johar67. --Razvan Socol (talk) 04:14, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:24, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kritiman mishra.jpg

unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not private media repository. Only (remaining) uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 05:21, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:24, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Genomic structure in Europeans dating back at least 36,200 years.jpg

According to summary, source is https://science.sciencemag.org/content/early/2014/11/05/science.aaa0114?versioned=true. Copyright violation. Rsk6400 (talk) 05:38, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:27, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:You have 3 wishes... (15760064366).jpg

COM:DW of a copyrighted character Genie (Disney). Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:05, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:28, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Me car honda civic 1999.jpg

"Me car honda civic". A Honda Civic is almost always in scope, but in this case "Me" is more prominent in the pic, which makes it OoS. E4024 (talk) 02:39, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: we have a lot of pictures of Honda, no need in Honda with "me". --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 22:03, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Діма Варварук.jpg

per COM:NOTUSED Andriy.v (talk) 07:02, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

IMHO it can always be used (in St. Valentine articles etc) but there is FBMD at MD. I would like to have it here but I gather it must be deleted for the reason I pointed at. --E4024 (talk) 22:14, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
ok, I do not oppose for keeping this image, if you think that it can be usefull.--Andriy.v (talk) 07:53, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It has received OTRS permission and if the nominator changed their idea my final opinion will be: Keep. --E4024 (talk) 04:15, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: nu okay, maybe this guy would look nice in valentines (and he is more or less popular blogger btw). --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 22:15, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Test .png

unused, uncategorised Estopedist1 (talk) 11:44, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: it looks like it used to serve as a test really but no longer in need. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 22:19, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:G-f.gif

unused and uncategorised file. Looks like some sort of personal artwork. Estopedist1 (talk) 12:24, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no reasonable explanation for what it is and what it might be used for. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 22:22, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sorry, couldn't help myself! (27864598476).jpg

out of scope - personal photo Mind matrix 13:10, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 22:23, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lbur.jpg

bad quality, no location given, unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. Estopedist1 (talk) 16:53, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 17:40, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ミファンダ１.jpg

Derivative work of non-free character. Batholith (talk) 15:38, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete COM:FOP Japan No freedom of panorama for 3D artwork in Japan. --Larryasou (talk) 17:30, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:27, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ミファンダ１.jpg

誤ってアップロードササササ (talk) 06:37, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Already deleted. --Minorax^talk 06:28, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Karina 111 w2.jpg

own work? copyright ROLAND Adelfrank (talk) 10:40, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 06:33, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Adhidech in Sriwichaiwithaya School 02.jpg

This my photo , I want to delete. Pitpisit (talk) 10:44, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 06:33, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Adhidech in SWC.jpg

This my photo , I want to delete. Pitpisit (talk) 10:44, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 06:33, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SWC 05.jpg

This my photo , I want to delete. Pitpisit (talk) 10:45, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 06:33, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SWC 04.jpg

This my photo , I want to delete. Pitpisit (talk) 10:45, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 06:33, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ปัจฉิมโรงเรียนศรีวิชัยวิทยา 01.jpg

This my photo , I want to delete. Pitpisit (talk) 10:46, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 06:34, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ปัจฉิมโรงเรียนศรีวิชัยวิทยา 02.jpg

This my photo , I want to delete. Pitpisit (talk) 10:46, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 06:34, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ปัจฉิมโรงเรียนศรีวิชัยวิทยา 03.jpg

This my photo , I want to delete. Pitpisit (talk) 10:46, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 06:34, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ปัจฉิมโรงเรียนศรีวิชัยวิทยา 04.jpg

This my photo , I want to delete. Pitpisit (talk) 10:46, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 06:34, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ผอ.และหมวดอังกฤษ.jpg

This my photo , I want to delete. Pitpisit (talk) 10:47, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 06:35, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SWC 01.jpg

This my photo , I want to delete. Pitpisit (talk) 10:49, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 06:30, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SWC 02.jpg

This my photo , I want to delete. Pitpisit (talk) 10:49, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 06:30, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SWC 03.jpg

This my photo , I want to delete. Pitpisit (talk) 10:49, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 06:30, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Amphawa Market in 05 December 2015 03.jpg

This my photo , I want to delete. Pitpisit (talk) 10:51, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 06:32, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Amphawa Market in 05 December 2015 02.jpg

This my photo , I want to delete. Pitpisit (talk) 10:52, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 06:32, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Amphawa Market in 05 December 2015 01.jpg

This my photo , I want to delete. Pitpisit (talk) 10:52, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 06:32, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ปัจฉิมศรีวิชัยวิทยา 14.jpg

This my photo , I want to delete. Pitpisit (talk) 10:52, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 06:35, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SWC 07.jpg

This my photo , I want to delete. Pitpisit (talk) 10:53, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 06:32, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ปัจฉิมโรงเรียนศรีวิชัยวิทยา 12.jpg

This my photo , I want to delete. Pitpisit (talk) 10:54, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 06:31, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ปัจฉิมโรงเรียนศรีวิชัยวิทยา 11.jpg

This my photo , I want to delete. Pitpisit (talk) 10:54, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 06:31, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ปัจฉิมโรงเรียนศรีวิชัยวิทยา 10.jpg

This my photo , I want to delete. Pitpisit (talk) 10:54, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 06:31, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ปัจฉิมโรงเรียนศรีวิชัยวิทยา 09.jpg

This my photo , I want to delete. Pitpisit (talk) 10:54, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 06:31, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ปัจฉิมโรงเรียนศรีวิชัยวิทยา 08.jpg

This my photo , I want to delete. Pitpisit (talk) 10:54, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 06:31, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ปัจฉิมโรงเรียนศรีวิชัยวิทยา 07.jpg

This my photo , I want to delete. Pitpisit (talk) 10:54, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 06:31, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ปัจฉิมโรงเรียนศรีวิชัยวิทยา 06.jpg

This my photo , I want to delete. Pitpisit (talk) 10:54, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 06:31, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ปัจฉิมโรงเรียนศรีวิชัยวิทยา 05.jpg

This my photo , I want to delete. Pitpisit (talk) 10:55, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 06:31, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Adhidech in Sriwichaiwithaya School 01.jpg

This my photo , I want to delete. Pitpisit (talk) 11:05, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 06:31, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:迪丽热巴160517.jpg

(CC BY-NC-ND 2.5) Edison2017 (talk) 11:43, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 06:36, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Senator Bill Armstrong and Congressman Hank Brown explain sodbuster bill, 1984.jpg

The family owns this photo and wants it to be deleted until they can determine and clarify copyright issues. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2019crisissimus2 (talk • contribs) 14:34, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Deleted by Gbawden. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Senator Bill Armstrong and Congressman Hank Brown explain sodbuster bill, 1984.jpg. --Minorax^talk 06:56, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:WIKIPEDIA.pdf

unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 18:59, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 06:39, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:WIKIPEDIA.pdf

Is this the same previously deleted file? E4024 (talk) 03:08, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:WIKIPEDIA.pdf

out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:01, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:WIKIPEDIA.pdf

A brief profile 186.175.195.209 10:43, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:15, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:K. Tolon.png

No sourcing information. Passport-style photo of a long-dead person. This is unlikely to be the uploader's own work. J Milburn (talk) 21:59, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Buidhe (talk) 22:00, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It doesn't have copyright violation.--Yiğitcank (talk) 13:05, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Most likely grabbed from here (bg image of https://kamiltolon.com/), lower resolution on http://www.bursadakultur.org/kamil_tolon.htm and here https://serbestpiyasa.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Kamil-Tolon-Kimdir.jpg with correct aspect ratio. --Achim (talk) 13:29, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Deleted by Ellin Beltz. --Minorax^talk 06:40, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Coronavirus signs Thimphu 2020-04-03.jpg

No freedom of panorama in Bhutan A1Cafel (talk) 08:27, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ə XPLICIT 00:14, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Parṇaśavarī mantra sign.jpg

No freedom of panorama in Bhutan A1Cafel (talk) 08:27, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ə XPLICIT 00:13, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tetris attack capa.jpg

Scan of game instruction booklet, original material is still in copyright. Chenzw Talk 09:08, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If the image is in violation of copyright, feel free to delete it. I just wanted to present an image of the game's visual identity, for better identification and page quality. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Diego de medeiros (talk • contribs) 22:22, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Clear copyvio, to the point of likely being eligible for speedy deletion. --Alex Cohn (talk) 19:07, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 05:43, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:محمد معین محمدی.png

RF/COpyright/ ahuR ☘ 17:47, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: COM:CSD#F10. --4nn1l2 (talk) 01:39, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Raghsedayereh.png

RF/COpyright ahuR ☘ 21:03, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: film poster. --4nn1l2 (talk) 03:06, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MV5BNGEwMTg1Y2ItNzMxZS00OGY4LTg1ZDYtM2JkZDI3ZThlMzY1XkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyODQzNzk3MzE@. V1 .jpg

RF/COpyright ahuR ☘ 21:03, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 03:39, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vpp2.jpg

RF/Copyright ahuR ☘ 21:10, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Promotional. --4nn1l2 (talk) 03:42, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:BARAREH.jpg

RF/Copyright ahuR ☘ 21:10, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Video game cover. --4nn1l2 (talk) 05:49, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:FarzadFarahvashi.jpg

RF/COpyright ahuR ☘ 21:02, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: cover art according to description. --4nn1l2 (talk) 03:53, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Joe Alaskey.jpg

Copyright violation, see Getty Images Andibrunt (talk) 08:39, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 16:17, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Clock of Thailand by have King and Queen.jpg

This my photo , I want to delete. Pitpisit (talk) 11:04, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: may contain an unacceptable derivative work. Ə XPLICIT 11:45, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Aiba Masaki.jpg

Previously published image, see https://www.google.com/search?safe=active&tbs=sbi:AMhZZivP1ico2PPoubrrSuNlQJoAZhcWvhiTWKcYoHI_1mqnfeinPRsGW3smM03e6y4GTPKLbvfDD3-LtAH1ObsjbR3Ixp1qlB9GXPhvVT0iMzVg7amToVW2GvvBILE_1KfQO1wfhGuSc5cmzQk5tvpHaIdhyO8qktRlxXmadhN4ZZNerKwa5Pbf7Ra1ZiEm8v7CCJIFfcRx51Hi9s8U4KurJenXGx7mnFKzDOdEz3lEWNZoiFUdtLgZHYYvurTE6feZYFx5iDTqMr5tKwr-cfIiP_1lTV_1l0yYqUvdFm_1u9yGbDrRWXJjO-PTVjD4WGAO-4XFqum7AdjerM0xuAAwBmPHR4eOSSIsdRg&sxsrf=ALeKk02lDr4lrcgHh8MBVzWOJYlfH1E69g:1593284840965&ei=6Jj3Xqy3OqioytMPyYii6Ag&q=相葉雅紀, &oq=相葉雅紀, &gs_lcp=CgZwc3ktYWIQAzICCAAyAggAMgIIADICCAAyAggAMgIIADICCAAyAggAMgIIADICCABQuNsDWLjbA2D-3ANoAHAAeACAAUWIAUWSAQExmAEAoAECoAEBqgEHZ3dzLXdpeg&sclient=psy-ab&ved=0ahUKEwisy-LH2KLqAhUolHIEHUmECI0Q4dUDCAw&uact=5 Ytoyoda (talk) 19:08, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ə XPLICIT 11:33, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rajabhat University Nakhon Pathom.jpg

This my photo , I want to delete. Pitpisit (talk) 11:03, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ə XPLICIT 00:09, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nakhon Pathom sing Sansoen Phra Barami 27.10.2016 (2).jpg

This my photo , I want to delete. Pitpisit (talk) 11:04, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ə XPLICIT 00:48, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mercedes Formica.jpg

first-half-of-the-20th-century photograph, unlikely own work Strakhov (talk) 13:01, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: insufficient author information. Ə XPLICIT 00:49, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Layla ahmed.png

One of the two remaining items of a blocked uploader. E4024 (talk) 13:49, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Small file without camera EXIF uploaded as own work. --E4024 (talk) 01:52, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 20:29, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Paulette Dubost 1939.jpg

Bogus CC0 license and "unknown author" claim is nonsense. The source itself says this is a screenshot from w:The Rules of the Game which is, of course, not PD. Эlcobbola _talk 16:19, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:51, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Paulette Dubost 1939.jpg

out of scope Adelfrank (talk) 23:29, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:51, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tolon Çamaşır Makinesi Patenti.png

An old patent. This is not the uploader's own work. J Milburn (talk) 21:57, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not an own work but not copyrighted either. If I am not wrong this kind of Turkish official documents are public. IMHO keep. --E4024 (talk) 22:02, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep--Yiğitcank (talk) 11:47, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom.--Nanahuatl (talk) 19:58, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
NOTE: I changed the copyright info. The author is T.C. Sanayi Bakanlığı / Repuclic of Turkey Ministry of Industry. --Kadıköylü (talk) 08:39, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The current license-template might not be the right one. I think that Template:PD-Legislation-Turkey might be more appropriate, as granting a patent is likely to be considered a legal act on behalf of the state. But I would like to hear the opinion of somebody accustomed with Turkish legislation or juridiction. --Túrelio (talk) 09:10, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Since 1994 there is the en:Turkish Patent and Trademark Office which is an independent legal entity but a governmental agency. The file nominated here is older than 1994 but there is no reason to think, even quite the opposite, that the erection of patents were not under the responsability of the government before 1994. If we take an USA exemple that tend to confirm this kind of reasoning. Thus as per Túrelio: I think {{PD-Legislation-Turkey}} is appropriate. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 10:41, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per my comment above. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 10:41, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pourya hr.jpg

RF/COPyright ahuR ☘ 20:50, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Fitindia at 06:49, 15 Dezember 2020 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE --Krdbot 13:49, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:Golmore

My user page. Golmore (talk) 13:43, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I request my user page to be deleted Golmore (talk) 18:21, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 00:35, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hungarian forint (coin) images uploaded by Nammarci~commonswiki

An image of a 3-dimensional object, like a coin:

Requires a license of the image which each of these had at the time they were uploaded, but which has been removed in each of these cases.
Requires a license for the object, which for each of these someone has used {{HU banknote}} which is for banknotes and specifically excludes use on images of coins.

COM:CUR Hungary states "The copyright status for designs of coins should be researched individually. Out-of-copyright banknotes and coins can use {{PD-old}}." There is no evidence that such research has been done on these. --BigrTex (talk) 19:13, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Regasterios (talk) 15:11, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mandatory temperature checks warning sign in healthcare centers 01.jpg

No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 17:13, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ə XPLICIT 13:09, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Граффити посвященная врачам.jpg

No FoP for 2D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 08:24, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ə XPLICIT 23:51, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:덕분에 챌린지 대표 로고.gif

Though KOGL license was found, there is no indication of which type of license is used. Since KOGL v2, v3 and v4 disallowed commercial use and/or derivative works, the copyright status is questionable A1Cafel (talk) 08:18, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I found the KOGL-1 version of original file. the file could be made from the original file. - Ellif (talk) 10:20, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: commercial uses and modifications to graphic elements are prohibited, according to the terms of use. – Kwj2772 (talk) 09:05, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ทำตัวแปรอักษร ร.9.jpg

This my photo , I want to delete. Pitpisit (talk) 10:45, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ə XPLICIT 02:16, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ปัจฉิมศรีวิชัยวิทยา 12.jpg

This my photo , I want to delete. Pitpisit (talk) 10:45, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ə XPLICIT 02:16, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ปัจฉิมศรีวิชัยวิทยา 11.jpg

This my photo , I want to delete. Pitpisit (talk) 10:45, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ə XPLICIT 02:16, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ปัจฉิมศรีวิชัยวิทยา 10.jpg

This my photo , I want to delete. Pitpisit (talk) 10:45, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ə XPLICIT 02:16, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:วันวิทยาศาสตร์ รร.ศรีวิชัยวิทยา.jpg

This my photo , I want to delete. Pitpisit (talk) 10:47, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ə XPLICIT 02:16, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:วันไหว้ครู 2558 (3).jpg

This my photo , I want to delete. Pitpisit (talk) 10:47, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ə XPLICIT 02:15, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:วิชาการ โรงเรียนศรีวิชัยวิทยา.jpg

This my photo , I want to delete. Pitpisit (talk) 10:47, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ə XPLICIT 02:15, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ศรีวิชัยวิทยา 31 มีนาคม 2017 01.jpg

This my photo , I want to delete. Pitpisit (talk) 10:47, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ə XPLICIT 02:15, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ศรีวิชัยวิทยา 31 มีนาคม 2017 03.jpg

This my photo , I want to delete. Pitpisit (talk) 10:48, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ə XPLICIT 02:15, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:โรงเรียนศรีวิชัยวิทยา ห้อง 125 (2).jpg

This my photo , I want to delete. Pitpisit (talk) 10:48, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ə XPLICIT 02:14, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:โรงเรียนศรีวิชัยวิทยา ห้อง 125 (3).jpg

This my photo , I want to delete. Pitpisit (talk) 10:48, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ə XPLICIT 02:14, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:โรงเรียนศรีวิชัยวิทยา ห้อง 125.jpg

This my photo , I want to delete. Pitpisit (talk) 10:48, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ə XPLICIT 02:14, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Thanwa Angnanon at Boscopitak (1).jpg

This my photo , I want to delete. Pitpisit (talk) 10:50, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ə XPLICIT 02:13, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Thanwa Angnanon at Boscopitak (2).jpg

This my photo , I want to delete. Pitpisit (talk) 10:50, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ə XPLICIT 02:13, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SWC 08.jpg

This my photo , I want to delete. Pitpisit (talk) 10:53, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ə XPLICIT 02:17, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Boy Scout of Sriwichaiwithaya School.jpg

This my photo , I want to delete. Pitpisit (talk) 11:01, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ə XPLICIT 02:12, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:محمد غنايم.jpg

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:51, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ə XPLICIT 02:19, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:EMANUELA PIOVANO SOTTOVOCE.jpg

tv screenshot copyrighted Caulfield (talk) 14:41, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ə XPLICIT 02:11, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Innenraum St. Michael (Ottmaring).jpg

Maler- und Bildhauerarbeiten von 1880 bis 1910. Möglicherweise besteht noch Urheberrechtsschutz. Daher bitte sicherheitshalber löschen XoMEoX (talk) 18:49, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; uploader request. — billinghurst sDrewth 22:18, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Almonaster la Real (Hueva) visto desde el Alto de la Era de la Cuesta..jpg

Porque está mal subido, y no lo veo ni encuentro. FJavier GómezL (talk) 21:46, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Porque es una obra mía que no quiero publicar en esta página FJavier GómezL (talk) 21:51, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Porque no la localizo cuando la busco FJavier GómezL (talk) 09:46, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. As soon as our admins keep the file I will correct the "Hueva" in the title for you. Tranqui. --E4024 (talk) 03:45, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Captain Tom mural on North Baileygate, Pontefract (21st June 2020).jpg

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 08:21, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This is one of a few graffiti pictures uploaded by Mtaylor848, that have been tagged for deletion. As per my comments on the first one I noticed - I agree that there is no FoP applicable in UK for "graphic works" e.g. murals COM:FOP UK#Freedom of panorama refers. However, this is graffiti (an illegal mural) so the former provisions are not fully applicable, in my opinion. I think the specific Commons policy at COM:GRAFFITI applies and the file should be kept accordingly. The situation with the file can be covered, and made clear to others, by tagging the file with the non-free graffiti tag. Thanks. Crep171166 (talk) 19:07, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment This is legally painted murals, and I see no reason to deny the painter's copyright. --A1Cafel (talk) 09:23, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment On what basis is it legally painted? I can find no record of its commission? Mtaylor848 (talk) 21:01, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment A closer image of the work, located at "2’s Company Hair Salon", in Pontefract, appears at the website of the local artist, Rachel List, here. The photographer seems to be Tim Hill who, I assume, has retained copyright. Martinevans123 (talk) 12:30, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The photographer is myself as per the licence and the date. The graffiti could well be Rachel List. Mtaylor848 (talk) 17:24, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - Tim Hill took the closer on that website? Martinevans123 (talk) 16:31, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    - It appears the subject has also been photographed by Tim Hill. Likely others too. Mtaylor848 (talk) 15:58, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Mtaylor848 if this image is kept, you should use the {{Art Photo}} template to acknowledge the copyright of the artist as a courtesy. FredWalsh (talk) 01:48, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:55, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rapçi.jpg

Personal image/Out of scope Harsh 2580 (talk) 02:29, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Has an article (candidate to deletion) at TR:WP as a rapper. I made his WD entry and have no doubt that he is in our scope as a young artist. I can imagine that people from TR:WP -as always they have done- will rush here to try to get his images deleted. Please let us not leave the initiative to WPs to decide our own notability concept, "scope", which is different. Thanks in advance. --E4024 (talk) 03:50, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Also see please: Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Z_!_Y_A_Z_A_N.jpg. We know nothing about that rapper but the one we have here already has several singles. --E4024 (talk) 22:59, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, and I think we should revisit the other file as well. No reason to be kept. Quakewoody (talk) 19:15, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ə XPLICIT 11:16, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Samanminika.jpg

RF/Copyright ahuR ☘ 17:41, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unused personal picture. --Lymantria (talk) 14:45, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hoàng Thi Thơ.jpg

It is fair use on vi.wiki vi:File:HoangThiTho.jpg MGA73 (talk) 13:06, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ə XPLICIT 00:48, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nhật Ngân.jpg

Fair use on vi.wiki vi:File:Nhat ngan.jpg MGA73 (talk) 14:50, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ə XPLICIT 00:48, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Những bước chân âm thầm.jpg

Fair use on vi.wiki vi:File:Nhung buoc chan am tham.JPG MGA73 (talk) 14:54, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ə XPLICIT 00:48, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MKA & LMO.jpg

It's probably photomontage! Original of this photo is with 3 people Themkview (talk) 21:33, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: While the nomination statement is not particularly coherent, this image has no source and no author information. Even assuming the purported date of 1906 is correct, this is too recent for our 120 threshold for PD-old-assumed (i.e., 1906 120 1=2027). --Эlcobbola _talk 16:01, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:226890 1840030653331 1617485982 1711742 4346809 n.jpg

Description / "Español: la foto fue sacada para madalena melina sanchez gimenez Español: la foto se saco un dia en el que magdalena estaba con sus amigas" IMHO this is quite out of scope and impossible to use, unless "madalena melina sanchez gimenez" (sic) could be a notable person. This upload can even be a not very nice joke to the person at the image who might be drunken. Surprised to see it here. E4024 (talk) 22:49, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10). --Эlcobbola _talk 15:58, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:PatsyBrown.jpg

own work? I do'nt believe Adelfrank (talk) 23:19, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: COM:PRP - consider also uploader history of untruths (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Heigljuniordrake.jpg). --Эlcobbola _talk 15:56, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Heigljuniordrake.jpg

own work? I do'nt believe Adelfrank (talk) 23:20, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Have you searched the image and find it somewhere older than this image's source? or any other evidence that prove it is not taken by the uploader?--Editor-1 (talk) 05:41, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Adelfrank: Don't want to answer?--Editor-1 (talk) 14:55, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not found in internet. Possible it's really own work. Looks like as a pic from a journal and not as a real photography. Adelfrank (talk) 15:32, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is only 18 KB. If you can upload a larger file everybody would feel better about it. Regards. --E4024 (talk) 15:35, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/KWYA2018 makes not a good feeling that's really an own pic of a glamour star from own hand. Adelfrank (talk) 15:39, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Unambiguous copyvio - see Getty. --Эlcobbola _talk 15:55, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:419-0405 gealach-gorm st-patricks-day-2018 rieckhof-hamburg hinnerk-ruemenapf.jpg

Complaint by Gabriell School of Irish Dance Hinnerk R (talk) 20:03, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests by uploader Hinnerk R (talk) 17:33, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This is not a valid reason for deletion. CC licenses are irrevocable, and request comes ca. 2 years after upload, well beyond courtesy deletion period. --Эlcobbola _talk 16:17, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:419-0266 gealach-gorm st-patricks-day-2018 rieckhof-hamburg hinnerk-ruemenapf.jpg

Complaint by Gabriell School of Irish Dance Hinnerk R (talk) 20:03, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests by uploader Hinnerk R (talk) 17:33, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This is not a valid reason for deletion. CC licenses are irrevocable, and request comes ca. 2 years after upload, well beyond courtesy deletion period. --Эlcobbola _talk 16:17, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:419-0272 gealach-gorm st-patricks-day-2018 rieckhof-hamburg hinnerk-ruemenapf.jpg

Complaint by Gabriell School of Irish Dance Hinnerk R (talk) 20:03, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests by uploader Hinnerk R (talk) 17:32, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This is not a valid reason for deletion. CC licenses are irrevocable, and request comes ca. 2 years after upload, well beyond courtesy deletion period. --Эlcobbola _talk 16:16, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:419-0284 gealach-gorm st-patricks-day-2018 rieckhof-hamburg hinnerk-ruemenapf.jpg

Complaint by Gabriell School of Irish Dance Hinnerk R (talk) 20:04, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests by uploader Hinnerk R (talk) 17:32, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This is not a valid reason for deletion. CC licenses are irrevocable, and request comes ca. 2 years after upload, well beyond courtesy deletion period. --Эlcobbola _talk 16:16, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:419-0285 gealach-gorm st-patricks-day-2018 rieckhof-hamburg hinnerk-ruemenapf.jpg

Complaint by Gabriell School of Irish Dance Hinnerk R (talk) 20:04, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests by uploader Hinnerk R (talk) 17:32, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This is not a valid reason for deletion. CC licenses are irrevocable, and request comes ca. 2 years after upload, well beyond courtesy deletion period. --Эlcobbola _talk 16:16, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:419-0315 gealach-gorm st-patricks-day-2018 rieckhof-hamburg hinnerk-ruemenapf.jpg

Complaint by Gabriell School of Irish Dance Hinnerk R (talk) 20:04, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests by uploader Hinnerk R (talk) 17:32, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This is not a valid reason for deletion. CC licenses are irrevocable, and request comes ca. 2 years after upload, well beyond courtesy deletion period. --Эlcobbola _talk 16:16, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:419-0331 gealach-gorm st-patricks-day-2018 rieckhof-hamburg hinnerk-ruemenapf.jpg

Complaint by Gabriell School of Irish Dance Hinnerk R (talk) 20:04, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests by uploader Hinnerk R (talk) 17:32, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This is not a valid reason for deletion. CC licenses are irrevocable, and request comes ca. 2 years after upload, well beyond courtesy deletion period. --Эlcobbola _talk 16:16, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:419-0363 gealach-gorm st-patricks-day-2018 rieckhof-hamburg hinnerk-ruemenapf.jpg

Complaint by Gabriell School of Irish Dance Hinnerk R (talk) 20:05, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests by uploader Hinnerk R (talk) 17:32, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This is not a valid reason for deletion. CC licenses are irrevocable, and request comes ca. 2 years after upload, well beyond courtesy deletion period. --Эlcobbola _talk 16:16, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:419-0375 gealach-gorm st-patricks-day-2018 rieckhof-hamburg hinnerk-ruemenapf.jpg

Complaint by Gabriell School of Irish Dance Hinnerk R (talk) 20:05, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests by uploader Hinnerk R (talk) 17:31, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This is not a valid reason for deletion. CC licenses are irrevocable, and request comes ca. 2 years after upload, well beyond courtesy deletion period. --Эlcobbola _talk 16:16, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:419-0381 gealach-gorm st-patricks-day-2018 rieckhof-hamburg hinnerk-ruemenapf.jpg

Complaint by Gabriell School of Irish Dance Hinnerk R (talk) 20:05, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests by uploader Hinnerk R (talk) 17:31, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This is not a valid reason for deletion. CC licenses are irrevocable, and request comes ca. 2 years after upload, well beyond courtesy deletion period. --Эlcobbola _talk 16:16, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:419-0382 gealach-gorm st-patricks-day-2018 rieckhof-hamburg hinnerk-ruemenapf.jpg

Complaint by Gabriell School of Irish Dance Hinnerk R (talk) 20:05, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests by uploader Hinnerk R (talk) 17:31, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This is not a valid reason for deletion. CC licenses are irrevocable, and request comes ca. 2 years after upload, well beyond courtesy deletion period. --Эlcobbola _talk 16:16, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:419-0403 gealach-gorm st-patricks-day-2018 rieckhof-hamburg hinnerk-ruemenapf.jpg

Complaint by Gabriell School of Irish Dance Hinnerk R (talk) 20:05, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests by uploader Hinnerk R (talk) 17:31, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This is not a valid reason for deletion. CC licenses are irrevocable, and request comes ca. 2 years after upload, well beyond courtesy deletion period. --Эlcobbola _talk 16:16, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Saint-patricks-day-2017 rieckhof gabriell-school-irish-dance 403-0097-hinnerk-ruemenapf.jpg

Complaint by Gabriell School of Irish Dance Hinnerk R (talk) 20:06, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests by uploader Hinnerk R (talk) 17:31, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This is not a valid reason for deletion. CC licenses are irrevocable, and request comes ca. 2 years after upload, well beyond courtesy deletion period. --Эlcobbola _talk 16:16, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Saint-patricks-day-2017 rieckhof gabriell-school-irish-dance 403-0130-hinnerk-ruemenapf.jpg

Complaint by Gabriell School of Irish Dance Hinnerk R (talk) 20:06, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests by uploader Hinnerk R (talk) 17:30, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This is not a valid reason for deletion. CC licenses are irrevocable, and request comes ca. 2 years after upload, well beyond courtesy deletion period. --Эlcobbola _talk 16:15, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Saint-patricks-day-2017 rieckhof gabriell-school-irish-dance 403-0146-hinnerk-ruemenapf.jpg

Complaint by Gabriell School of Irish Dance Hinnerk R (talk) 20:07, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests by uploader Hinnerk R (talk) 17:30, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This is not a valid reason for deletion. CC licenses are irrevocable, and request comes ca. 2 years after upload, well beyond courtesy deletion period. --Эlcobbola _talk 16:15, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Saint-patricks-day-2017 rieckhof gabriell-school-irish-dance 403-0174-hinnerk-ruemenapf.jpg

Complaint by Gabriell School of Irish Dance Hinnerk R (talk) 20:07, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests by uploader Hinnerk R (talk) 17:30, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Эlcobbola _talk 16:15, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Saint-patricks-day-2017 rieckhof gabriell-school-irish-dance 403-0212-hinnerk-ruemenapf.jpg

Complaint by Gabriell School of Irish Dance Hinnerk R (talk) 20:07, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests by uploader Hinnerk R (talk) 17:30, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This is not a valid reason for deletion. CC licenses are irrevocable, and request comes ca. 2 years after upload, well beyond courtesy deletion period. --Эlcobbola _talk 16:15, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Saint-patricks-day-2017 rieckhof gabriell-school-irish-dance 403-0221-hinnerk-ruemenapf.jpg

Complaint by Gabriell School of Irish Dance Hinnerk R (talk) 20:07, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests by uploader Hinnerk R (talk) 17:30, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This is not a valid reason for deletion. CC licenses are irrevocable, and request comes ca. 2 years after upload, well beyond courtesy deletion period. --Эlcobbola _talk 16:15, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:389-0117-hinnerk-ruemenapf 02.jpg

Complaint by Gabriell School of Irish Dance Hinnerk R (talk) 20:09, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests by uploader Hinnerk R (talk) 17:30, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This is not a valid reason for deletion. CC licenses are irrevocable, and request comes ca. 2 years after upload, well beyond courtesy deletion period. --Эlcobbola _talk 16:15, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:389-0135-hinnerk-ruemenapf 02.jpg

Complaint by Gabriell School of Irish Dance Hinnerk R (talk) 20:09, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests by uploader Hinnerk R (talk) 17:29, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This is not a valid reason for deletion. CC licenses are irrevocable, and request comes ca. 2 years after upload, well beyond courtesy deletion period. --Эlcobbola _talk 16:14, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:389-0145-hinnerk-ruemenapf 02.jpg

Complaint by Gabriell School of Irish Dance Hinnerk R (talk) 20:09, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests by uploader Hinnerk R (talk) 17:29, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This is not a valid reason for deletion. CC licenses are irrevocable, and request comes ca. 2 years after upload, well beyond courtesy deletion period. --Эlcobbola _talk 16:14, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:389-0149-hinnerk-ruemenapf 02.jpg

Complaint by Gabriell School of Irish Dance Hinnerk R (talk) 20:09, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests by uploader Hinnerk R (talk) 17:29, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This is not a valid reason for deletion. CC licenses are irrevocable, and request comes ca. 2 years after upload, well beyond courtesy deletion period. --Эlcobbola _talk 16:14, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:389-0151-hinnerk-ruemenapf 02.jpg

Complaint by Gabriell School of Irish Dance Hinnerk R (talk) 20:09, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests by uploader Hinnerk R (talk) 17:29, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This is not a valid reason for deletion. CC licenses are irrevocable, and request comes ca. 2 years after upload, well beyond courtesy deletion period. --Эlcobbola _talk 16:14, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:389-0173-hinnerk-ruemenapf 02.jpg

Complaint by Gabriell School of Irish Dance Hinnerk R (talk) 20:10, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests by uploader Hinnerk R (talk) 17:29, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This is not a valid reason for deletion. CC licenses are irrevocable, and request comes ca. 2 years after upload, well beyond courtesy deletion period. --Эlcobbola _talk 16:15, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:389-0193-hinnerk-ruemenapf 01.jpg

Complaint by Gabriell School of Irish Dance Hinnerk R (talk) 20:10, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests by uploader Hinnerk R (talk) 17:29, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This is not a valid reason for deletion. CC licenses are irrevocable, and request comes ca. 2 years after upload, well beyond courtesy deletion period. --Эlcobbola _talk 16:15, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:389-0208-hinnerk-ruemenapf 01.jpg

Complaint by Gabriell School of Irish Dance Hinnerk R (talk) 20:10, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests by uploader Hinnerk R (talk) 17:28, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This is not a valid reason for deletion. CC licenses are irrevocable, and request comes ca. 2 years after upload, well beyond courtesy deletion period. --Эlcobbola _talk 16:14, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:389-0221-hinnerk-ruemenapf.jpg

Complaint by Gabriell School of Irish Dance Hinnerk R (talk) 20:10, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests by uploader Hinnerk R (talk) 17:28, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This is not a valid reason for deletion. CC licenses are irrevocable, and request comes ca. 2 years after upload, well beyond courtesy deletion period. --Эlcobbola _talk 16:14, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:389-0231-hinnerk-ruemenapf 01.jpg

Complaint by Gabriell School of Irish Dance Hinnerk R (talk) 20:10, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests by uploader Hinnerk R (talk) 17:28, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This is not a valid reason for deletion. CC licenses are irrevocable, and request comes ca. 2 years after upload, well beyond courtesy deletion period. --Эlcobbola _talk 16:14, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gabriell-school-of-irish-dance saint-patricks-show-2015 rieckhof-hamburg 371-0243-hinnerk-ruemenapf.jpg

Complaint by Gabriell School of Irish Dance Hinnerk R (talk) 20:11, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests by uploader Hinnerk R (talk) 17:28, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This is not a valid reason for deletion. CC licenses are irrevocable, and request comes ca. 2 years after upload, well beyond courtesy deletion period. --Эlcobbola _talk 16:13, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gabriell-school-of-irish-dance saint-patricks-show-2015 rieckhof-hamburg 371-0250-hinnerk-ruemenapf.jpg

Complaint by Gabriell School of Irish Dance Hinnerk R (talk) 20:11, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests by uploader Hinnerk R (talk) 17:28, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This is not a valid reason for deletion. CC licenses are irrevocable, and request comes ca. 2 years after upload, well beyond courtesy deletion period. --Эlcobbola _talk 16:13, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gabriell-school-of-irish-dance saint-patricks-show-2015 rieckhof-hamburg 371-0259-hinnerk-ruemenapf.jpg

Complaint by Gabriell School of Irish Dance Hinnerk R (talk) 20:12, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests by uploader Hinnerk R (talk) 17:26, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This is not a valid reason for deletion. CC licenses are irrevocable, and request comes ca. 2 years after upload, well beyond courtesy deletion period. --Эlcobbola _talk 16:13, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:FcRidingsBadge.png

Outside of scope. Logo of amateur football team. Del_Usion23 (talk) 20:20, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola _talk 16:11, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:سیناایزدبین.jpg

Deleted: COM:NETCOPYVIO - here. --Эlcobbola _talk 16:08, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2013 10 Kolka (34).jpg

Duplicate of File:Kolkas_ragā_-_panoramio_(5).jpg later upload Dāvis Kļaviņš (talk) 21:04, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Procedural. This is a redirect to the referenced image; there is no image uploaded at File:2013 10 Kolka (34).jpg. --Эlcobbola _talk 16:04, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nik Kershaw in 2020.jpg

Image appears on Kershaw's FB profile - no evidence that uploader is the photographer and has the rights to give the image away 24.245.70.140 17:23, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. No response from uploader. One-purpose account to make edits about the subject at English Wikipedia. Thuresson (talk) 23:29, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Justina Vail Evans MCC CHt.png

This photo is unlikely to be the work of the uploader, who made no other contributions here but made a few edits to the subjects article on Wikipedia. The photo is most likely to have been copied from the subjects website. FredWalsh (talk) 17:47, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nomination. Thuresson (talk) 23:26, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Paintbrush screenshot.png

Inside the image file, the project name in Paintbrush contains profanity. "Shitty" is a profane word. DesktopTech2020 (talk) 18:42, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shanghai killer whale (talk • contribs) 19:43, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Because of a profane word “shitty” is used in the Paintbrush project name: “shitty heart diagram” inside the image file. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DesktopTech2020 (talk • contribs) 18:39, 27 June 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by TechExpert2020 (talk • contribs) 22:40, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done, COM:NOTCENSORED. Thuresson (talk) 23:19, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Khanato di Crimea.png

This Wavy Flag is an frame ripped from the Game "Empire: Total War" https://farm4.static.flickr.com/3553/3338173639_a0b3932cdb_b.jpg i doubt this was ever created by the uploader and put under creative commons BlinxTheKitty (talk) 18:50, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, per nomination. Thuresson (talk) 23:15, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Karina Mora.jpg

2012 Twitter broadcast by the subject. The uploader has uploaded only two pics to Commons, both about her and both in DR ("own work"). E4024 (talk) 19:09, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, the other uploads from this user, including Commons:Deletion requests/File:Karina 111 w2.jpg, shows that his or her's uploads are problematic. Thuresson (talk) 23:12, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alder station platform.jpg

Request by author Eti15TrSf (talk) 03:26, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep COM:INUSE --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:18, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. In use. --E4024 (talk) 03:04, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Masturbation, using three cockrings, glans covered in pre-ejaculate.jpg

The commons is not an amateur porn site. This file does not serve a valid educational purpose. Aaronwells12 (talk) 06:37, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unused image of questionable educational value. AshFriday (talk) 23:35, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Hosted for a year and a half without any problem. Potential illustrative use for rubber cock rings to sustain a firm erection. Closing admin please note nominating account's first and only edit to Commons has been this DR. --Fæ (talk) 11:49, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no consensus. ✗plicit 01:21, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Masturbation, using three cockrings, glans covered in pre-ejaculate.jpg

We already have over a hundred photos of cock rings in use, I highly doubt this one with a penis covered in slime is going to be anyone’s first choice for anything but vandalism Dronebogus (talk) 08:12, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:30, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Als-kanini.ogg

Info-farmer (talk) 02:01, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Info Rationale for deletion: "wrong language code ; request by mail". Thuresson (talk) 19:47, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Use the "move" tab if you want to change the name of a file. Thuresson (talk) 19:47, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lauren McLean Headshot.jpg

the source does not show any proof of free use 47.223.78.205 03:28, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, From cityofboise.org. Terms of use: "Unless otherwise specified, all materials appearing on City Sites or the sites of its affiliated contractors and vendors, including, but not limited to the text, site design, logos, trademarks and tradenames, graphics, icons, images, and the selection, assembly, and arrangement thereof, are protected intellectual property owned by the City or other third-parties". Thuresson (talk) 20:02, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:วันไหว้ครู 2558 (2).jpg

This my photo , I want to delete. Pitpisit (talk) 10:47, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I don't have a problem with this request; the image is unused anyway. Do you also want to request the same for File:วันไหว้ครู 2558.jpg, or is that image okay? --Paul_012 (talk) 15:46, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, not in use today. Thuresson (talk) 20:04, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sriwichsi Wittaya 01.01.2016.jpg

This my photo , I want to delete. Pitpisit (talk) 10:48, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done, used at da:Bhumibol Adulyadej. Thuresson (talk) 20:05, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:"Village People" smiley.png

Out of scope? BlinxTheKitty (talk) 18:41, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all smilies on commons? - No. --Itu (talk) 07:07, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done, there needs to be a more tangible evidence that there is a problem with five smilies in various costumes. Thuresson (talk) 20:14, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:"Village People" smiley.png

Derived from a file that was deleted due to copyright violation A1Cafel (talk) 10:01, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nom; relevant CV deleted file was File:"Village People" smiley (animated).gif -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:47, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:John Demjanjuk 2.jpg

Not "a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment" as required by {{PD-GermanGov}} nor are private documents considered publication. Do we know when these documents first were publicly revealed? Buidhe (talk) 19:28, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Likely "revealed" in the 1940s. Zezen (talk) 10:57, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, per nomination. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:John Demjanjuk 1.jpg. Thuresson (talk) 20:16, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Map of the Ottoman Empire(1).png

This map is incorrect. It should be deleted so that people are not given false information. Aybeg (talk) 05:38, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. For some reason it is not used. E4024 (talk) 19:37, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mesela nereleri yanlış? Detay ve dayanak alabilir miyiz?

For example, just as the File:Ottoman Empire Largest Borders Map.jpg shows clearly, Western Sahara was not an Ottoman territory. Look quickly at the map you uploaded because they may delete it. (You can always use it to make a correct map BTW.) --E4024 (talk) 23:00, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This is an incorrect, misleading and ahistorical map of the Ottoman Empire (as I have previously written in the description).--Dakmor Tojira (talk) 09:52, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There are so many wrong things about this map. I do not want to bother writing all of them but African and Ukranian borders have huge mistakes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Visnelma (talk • contribs)

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax^talk 05:18, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Szebnie 1938 - Helena Gorayska i St Dubiel.jpg

unclear copyright status, no evidence of publication before 1994 as required by copyright tag Buidhe (talk) 01:13, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 01:33, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rice Terrace at Nignt in Japan.jpg

Contains privacy data Tmv (talk) 12:47, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 01:34, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rice Terrace in Japan.jpg

Contains privacy data Tmv (talk) 12:48, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 01:34, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Henrik Koefoeds Oase.jpg

Der er en bedre udgave af billedet, der viser oase-skiltets nuværende placering Sangforeningen Morgenrøden (talk) 14:22, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 01:35, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Бібліотека імені Заболотного1.jpg

Copyvio, building erected after 2010, no FOP in Ukraine and no permission. Oleg (talk) 14:37, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 01:36, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2020-03-23 Quarantänestation am Flughafen.jpg

This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as no source (No source since) JPF (talk) 14:47, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unbegründeter Antrag. Die Quelle ist mit "Gesundheitsministerium Osttimors" klar genannt und entspricht dem Tag {{PD-TLGov}}. --JPF (talk) 14:50, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

verlinkt. --21:04, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --A.Savin 01:37, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ünal Doğan Organizasyondan.jpg

Please see MD and other deleted files by the same uploader. E4024 (talk) 16:53, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 01:38, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Teuteur Haus Austellung.jpg

Incompatible PD-Mark license. Secondly the cited author Ernst Deutsch only died in 1969 which means this work is copyrighted for the next 70 years after his death until January 1, 2040. See German copyright rules Life 70 years Leoboudv (talk) 20:01, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 01:38, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Samtrans 833 Interior.jpg

Request by author Eti15TrSf (talk) 03:26, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Too late for that. --E4024 (talk) 03:02, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Unused, no valid arguement to keep. ~riley (talk) 18:48, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Чучев Г.Г. (talk · contribs)

Possible copyright violation. Photo of print version of the image.

File:Чучев Григорий Алексеевич.jpg

Maxinvestigator (talk) 13:01, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 18:49, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Shaolin stammbaum familie wang.jpg

maybe copyright violation from https://shaolintempel.ch/ueber-uns/stammbaum/

Please verify. Doc Taxon (talk) 06:12, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Confirmed copyvio. An archived copy of Shaolintempel.ch in 2018 predates the Commons upload in 2020. Shaolintempel.ch has a copyright notice. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 02:41, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 18:50, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Marque-mindef.jpg

Unused old low-res png version of a flag. CocoricoPolynesien (talk) 15:08, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete superseded universally replaced too blurry to be useful. Kathisma (talk) 23:06, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 18:50, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2020-05-11 14-19-08 masque-Belfort.jpg

Derivative work of a copyrighted leaflet A1Cafel (talk) 16:01, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose It's my work !!!!--ComputerHotline (talk) 05:41, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No valid reason to keep, as above. ~riley (talk) 18:50, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:PG Rwanda.jpg

Maybe copyright Violation from https://budejcka.drbna.cz/z-kraje/ceskokrumlovsko/22928-cim-nas-mohou-inspirovat-buddhisticke-mnisky-odpoved-da-v-klasterech-cesky-krumlov-reditelka-unicef-cr-pavla-gomba.html MrJaroslavik (talk) 18:22, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Definetly copyvio for two reasons. Budejcka Drbna post is from 2019 and says Všechna práva vyhrazena, which translates to all rights reserved. This predates the Commons upload in 2020. Otherwise, any photos by UNICEF is copyrighted. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 02:58, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 18:51, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kenantukel.jpg

Prof. Dr. Kenan Tükel (1915-1993) is one of the pioneers of neurology in Turkey and he is quite notable. Notwithstanding this some family member uploaded the image and tried to make an article of his in vain, due to lack of experience. I changed source from own to family album and would like to make his WD entry, hoping that the file will be kept. Please note that Google search finds it only in Commons. Many thanks. E4024 (talk) 02:07, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no entry in Wikidata and I can not find any Wikipedia article about this subject. Exif data shows that somebody took a photo of a photo which does not make this "own work". Thuresson (talk) 19:55, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe I was not clear enough above. I have been waiting for a "keep" decision to proceed with the WD item and probably an article. E4024 (talk) 20:10, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: missing original author, date, and permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:21, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jo wood logo.gif

Simple? Not over ToO? No CR? E4024 (talk) 13:45, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:23, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2020 coronavirus cases by date of report-ru.svg

Request from the sole author of the translation. The image does not display correctly. HFoxii (talk) 16:33, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:29, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Human-3175027 1920.jpg

This file was initially tagged by BevinKacon as Dw no source since (dw no source since) MGA73 (talk) 15:33, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a collage of different logos. I think the source is obvious. The source of the Facebook logo is Facebook and the source of the Twitter logo is Twitter etc. The problem is that Twitter bird is copyrighted. It is just one of many logos so I think you could argue that it is COM:DM but if other users disagree just nuke it. --MGA73 (talk) 15:35, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:30, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:USAUSA.jpg

Please see COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 17:15, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:32, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1700 e-mails van Elanor Boekholt-O'Sullivan.jpg

out of scope, and probably part of a hate campaing outside Wikimedia Edoderoo (talk) 17:59, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:32, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Metro-Net Dawson.jpg

out of scope Adelfrank (talk) 18:22, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

and also if is the right pic, what I do'nt believe - it is F1 F2: https://publicdelivery.org/martin-kippenberger-metro-net/ Adelfrank (talk) 10:00, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: historic photo without original author, date, and permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:34, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Логотип POWERNET на белом.svg

non-free logo Khinkali (talk) 18:41, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:35, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LA Metro 5499.jpg

Request by author Eti15TrSf (talk) 03:26, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Too late for that. --E4024 (talk) 03:01, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: courtesy deletion, plenty of alternatives in its category. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:05, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Union City station new entrance.jpg

Request by author Eti15TrSf (talk) 03:27, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: courtesy deletion, plenty of alternatives in its category. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:05, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MUNI 2014 Interior.jpg

Request by author Eti15TrSf (talk) 03:27, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused image with personality right issues. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:07, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MUNI 1058.jpg

Request by author Eti15TrSf (talk) 03:27, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: courtesy deletion, plenty of alternatives in its category. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:07, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:24th St Mission station hall.jpg

Request by author Eti15TrSf (talk) 03:28, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: courtesy deletion, plenty of alternatives in its category. Blurry anyway. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:08, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bay Fair station hall.jpg

Request by author Eti15TrSf (talk) 03:28, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: courtesy deletion, alternatives in its category. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:09, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bay Fair station platform.jpg

Request by author Eti15TrSf (talk) 03:28, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: courtesy deletion, alternatives in its category. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:09, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Contenido caja Alimentos Para Chile.jpg

Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 09:17, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!. I found about this deletion request and wanted to share some input for a decision.

Chilean Intellectual Property Law (Law number 17.336) allows “the incidental and exceptional usage of a copyright protected work; with purposes of criticism, commentary, mockery, teaching, academic or investigative interest, as long as the utilization doesn’t constitute a undercover exploitation of the protected work” (Article 71 Q, own translation)

I uploaded the photo not as a detailed picture of a single package, but to show the full content of the food box that Chilean government is distributing during the Covid-19 pandemic, under an academic point of view. As the food box contains packaged food, it’s impossible to discuss about without its packaging. Also, as the stockage for food has varied, and many companies are being employed to craft each box, the brands contained sparked discussion (and that falls under criticism)

Even more: the disposition of the products avoid exploitation of their packaging on its own, and makes impossible its usage outside this picture context

Probably this photo shall pass the US-based Fair Use doctrine, but I’m sure someone else can explain that better than me --Potter System (talk) 15:50, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep DM. E4024 (talk) 22:16, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:E4024: DM. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:13, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2011 09 Kolka (38).jpg

Very similar image to https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:An_autumn_-_panoramio.jpg which is uploaded earlier. Dāvis Kļaviņš (talk) 11:08, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: and redirected. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:16, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Normani August 2019.jpeg

Dubious own work. Of course I may be wrong. See also the DRs of crops. E4024 (talk) 16:18, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: insufficient reason for deletion. Not found elsewhere using Google Images. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:24, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:HassanZirak-Kras Chite Kresha.ogg

The vocalist died in 1972 and his voice is in the public domain in Iran. But what about the composer and the poet? Who are they? Are their works in the public domain too? 4nn1l2 (talk) 11:10, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This music is so old! And in the public domain {{PD-Iran}} are! This music is from the 1960s!

In Persian: All the people who participated in arranging and playing this music have died!

به فارسی: همه افرادی که در تنظیم و نواختن این موسیقی شرکت داشته اند درگذشته اند. مانند مجتبی میرزاده و سایر. همانطور که گفتم این ترانه در دهه 1340 ظبط شده است یعنی در فاصله سال های 1340 الی 1343 که حسن زیرک در رادیو کرمانشاه بوده است.!Masoud bukani (talk) 19:24, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

شاعر و نوازنده و تنظیم‌کننده و ... را نام ببرید و وضعیت اثر را با توجه به زنده بودن یا نبودنشان مشخص کنید. 4nn1l2 (talk) 02:58, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

دوست عزیز جناب 4nn1l2 همینطوری رو هوا مقاله‌ها و پرونده‌ها رو نامزد حذف نکنید! از پاسخ فعلی شما متوجه شدم گویا هیچ شناختی از خواننده اثر (حسن زیرک) ندارید. شاعر و ترانه‌سرا خودش است!! تنظیم کننده و رهبر تیم نوازنده‌گان جناب مرحوم میرزاده است. سوماً این ترانه/اثر در سال‌های 1340 تا 1342 در کرمانشاه ضبط شده است. ما می‌دانیم و واضح است خواننده (بعنوان شاعر و خواننده) تنظیم کننده فوت کرده‌اند. یک حساب سرانگشتی کنیم، نوازندگان اگر در زمان ضبط 25 الی 30 سال سن داشته‌اند اکنون اگر زنده باشند، سنی حدود 80 سال دارند! ما می‌دانیم که بیشتر همکاران آثار حسن زیرک فوت کرده‌اند شما می‌توانید به لیست همکاران حسن زیرک مراجعه کنید که تقریباً همگی‌آن‌ها فوت نموده‌اند. / Masoud bukani (talk) 12:37, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Masoud bukani: آیا منظور از مرحوم میرزاده، fa:مجتبی میرزاده است؟ 4nn1l2 (talk) 13:15, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

بله منظور ایشان (مجتبی میرزاده) است.Masoud bukani (talk) 17:43, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete [vote by the nominator] Up untill now, I was unsure about the copyright status of the work due to lack of authorship information (which should be provided by the uploader). Now, I'm certain this is a copyright violation because the arrangement has been done by en:Mojtaba Mirzadeh who was also the head of the musical performers, according to User:Masoud Bukani. He died in 2005, which makes his works copyrighted until at least 2055 in Iran, his home country. 4nn1l2 (talk) 17:57, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

جناب 4nn1l2 کدام آثار استاد حسن زیرک دارای کپی رایت است؟؟؟ اگر آثارش حق و حقوق قانونی داشت، الان وضعیت آثارش این گونه نبود متسفانه، خوانندگان تُرک، فارس، کُرد به راحتی از آثار او اسکی می‌روند؟ اگر این آثار دارای حق کپی رایت هستند، لطفاً مدرک ارائه کنید و مستند کنید. بنده با حذف مخالفم! شما موافق حذف و بنده موافق ماندن، سپس تنها با صحبت‌های شما نمی‌شود تصمیم به حذف گرفت. اگر مستند و مدرک دارید که این آثار حسن زیرک دارای حق کپی رایت است، لطفاً ارائه کنید.!Masoud bukani (talk) 16:35, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

These works are known as "Hassan Zirak" and are registered in his name! He died in 1972.Masoud bukani (talk) 16:40, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:56, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ellen Church.jpg

File:Ellen Church (cropped).jpg

Information about the first publication of the image in the source is missing. Maxinvestigator (talk) 12:21, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both. It is the responsibility of uploaders to provide sufficient evidence of initial publication without copyright notice. The source fails to credit where they obtained the image. Even UPI carelessly cites Commons as the source of this image. Woman's Day magazine credits the image to Fred Morley/Getty Images, and Daily Mail also credits Getty Images (although identifying the subject as Paddy Naismith (Q105925572)). Other images of Ellen Church can be found at the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum (1, 2). Published images from the 1930s through 1950s can be seen here, here, here and here: further research is needed to establish whether they are public domain due to {{PD-US-no notice}} or {{PD-US-not renewed}}. --Animalparty (talk) 21:01, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In general, lack of publication info is not an automatic reason for deletion. Given the nature of photos and other works, and how many places they can be found, it's often pretty apparent that it was published at the time, or most likely so. The COM:PCP standard is significant doubt, not a theoretical doubt, which is all lack of publication often amounts to. If there are indications that it did remain unpublished -- such as something coming out of an author's estate -- that can make the publication question much more significant. This looks like a publicity photo, and it has many sources, so I have little doubt it was published at the time.

However, as noted above, it is at gettyimages, as a UK photograph with a named author, and the pictured person is not Ellen Church (rather Paddy Naismith, an early British woman pilot). I have not found life dates for the photographer, but he worked for Fox Photos from 1926 to at least 1951 it looks like, so he lived at least that long and as such the photo is still under UK copyright. If it was simultaneously published in the U.S., it would have avoided the URAA, but that would require some evidence. If it did not avoid the URAA, it will be under copyright for a few more years in the U.S. as well. But the UK source (and misidentified status) makes the situation seem pretty clear (a photo of Ellen Church here does look like a different person). So,

Delete for me. Carl Lindberg (talk) 05:10, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:59, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bellingham Metro News.jpg

This file was initially tagged by SounderBruce as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.facebook.com/intGBN/. Deletion challenged at COM:UDR. Opening discussion. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:08, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Moved discussion from COM:UDR (Special:PermaLink/429143058#File:Bellingham Metro News.jpg) --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:11, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am the owner of Facebook.com/intGBN I haven’t used that page in a long time. I am the owner and can prove it. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2601:602:A7F:700:4D60:8AF7:C778:F9EB (talk) 05:45, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FACEBOOK.COM/intGBN is owned by Bellingham Metro News: proof from post: https://www.facebook.com/841121109241569/posts/3307241222629533/?d=n — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gonzafer001 (talk • contribs) 03:46, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: COM:OTRS needed. ~riley (talk) 18:49, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Karel Trudak.jpg

This work is not official work so it is copyrighted. --Albert Horáček (talk) 15:57, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, per nomination. See also Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Czech Republic. Thuresson (talk) 00:12, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:King & Prince First Concert Tour 2018 の登場シーン.jpg

Screenshot from copyrighted DVD, maybe. Seems like not own work. Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:18, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"en:King & Prince" is a Japanese idol group. Their concert tour is on DVD (and Blu-ray) and on sale. [2] This image is probably a screenshot of that video. The Exif also shows that this is a screenshot. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 16:37, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 10:10, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fabricación de máscaras y barbijos 3D en el Museo Malvinas (49883694608).jpg

No FoP for 2D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 07:15, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The 2d work of art is n the background and not the main subject, as the main subject is the production of covid masks in the Museo Malvinas e Islas del Atlántico Sur. Even so, the 2d work of art was made by the Museo Malvinas e Islas del Atlántico Sur, that is a museum of the argetinian Ministerio de Cultura de la Nación and the flickr account is the official account of Ministerio de Cultura de la Nación, so there is no copyright violation as the author of the 2d work and photo are the same. Tm (talk) 14:02, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, Ministry of Culture is unlikely the creator. --A.Savin 20:16, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fabricación de máscaras y barbijos 3D en el Museo Malvinas (49884195051).jpg

No FoP for 2D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 07:16, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The 2d work of art was made by the Museo Malvinas e Islas del Atlántico Sur, that is a museum of the argetinian Ministerio de Cultura de la Nación and the flickr account is the official account of Ministerio de Cultura de la Nación, so there is no copyright violation as the author of the 2d work and photo are the same. Tm (talk) 14:02, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, Ministry of Culture is unlikely the creator. --A.Savin 20:15, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:NHS mural seen during the COVID-19 pandemic on the Baxtergate side of the Horse Vaults pub in Pontefract (23rd May 2020).jpg

No FoP for "graphic works" like murals in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 08:16, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep (Addendum - see my update below.) Sadly, have to agree. COM:FOP UK#Freedom of panorama for the specific link. Shame though. Crep171166 (talk) 10:51, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Sorry, I have changed my opinion to keep. I have done a bit more digging in the policies as I do feel this picture is important in documenting the mood of the current historic times. Seems an even more specific part of Commons policy may apply:COM:GRAFFITI and the situation can be remedied by tagging the file with the non-free graffiti tag. Thanks. Crep171166 (talk) 12:07, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per COM:GRAFFITI and Crep171166. — Tartan357 ^(Talk) 17:47, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment This is legally painted murals, and I see no reason to deny the painter's copyright. --A1Cafel (talk) 09:22, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per Crep171166 and w:User:Tartan357. Murals have long been are a vital part of expressing contemporary issues in England. No Swan So Fine (talk) 17:50, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment On what basis is it legally painted? I can find no record of its commission? Mtaylor848 (talk) 21:07, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 20:13, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:COVID-19 pandemic related mural on HBR Signs & Designs, Sandbeck Park, Wetherby (13th June 2020).jpg

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 08:20, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This is one of a few graffiti pictures uploaded by Mtaylor848, that have been tagged for deletion. As per my comments on the first one I noticed - I agree that there is no FoP applicable in UK for "graphic works" e.g. murals COM:FOP UK#Freedom of panorama refers. However, this is graffiti (an illegal mural) so the former provisions are not fully applicable, in my opinion. I think the specific Commons policy at COM:GRAFFITI applies and the file should be kept accordingly. The situation with the file can be covered, and made clear to others, by tagging the file with the non-free graffiti tag. Thanks. Crep171166 (talk) 19:04, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment This is legally painted murals, and I see no reason to deny the painter's copyright. --A1Cafel (talk) 09:23, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 20:12, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Captain Tom mural on the side of the Maltshovel, Beastfair, Pontefract (21st June 2020).jpg

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 08:21, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This is one of a few graffiti pictures uploaded by Mtaylor848, that have been tagged for deletion. As per my comments on the first one I noticed - I agree that there is no FoP applicable in UK for "graphic works" e.g. murals COM:FOP UK#Freedom of panorama refers. However, this is graffiti (an illegal mural) so the former provisions are not fully applicable, in my opinion. I think the specific Commons policy at COM:GRAFFITI applies and the file should be kept accordingly. The situation with the file can be covered, and made clear to others, by tagging the file with the non-free graffiti tag. Thanks. Crep171166 (talk) 19:10, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment This is legally painted murals, and I see no reason to deny the painter's copyright. --A1Cafel (talk) 09:23, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment On what basis is it legally painted? I can find no record of its commission? Mtaylor848 (talk) 21:04, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 20:12, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:COVID-19 mural on gates on the North Baileygate side of the Hope and Anchor, Pontefract (21st June 2020).jpg

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 08:21, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This is one of a few graffiti pictures uploaded by Mtaylor848, that have been tagged for deletion. As per my comments on the first one I noticed - I agree that there is no FoP applicable in UK for "graphic works" e.g. murals COM:FOP UK#Freedom of panorama refers. However, this is graffiti (an illegal mural) so the former provisions are not fully applicable, in my opinion. I think the specific Commons policy at COM:GRAFFITI applies and the file should be kept accordingly. The situation with the file can be covered, and made clear to others, by tagging the file with the non-free graffiti tag. Thanks. Crep171166 (talk) 19:14, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment This is legally painted murals, and I see no reason to deny the painter's copyright. --A1Cafel (talk) 09:24, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment On what basis is it legally painted? I can find no record of its commission?

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 20:11, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:COVID-19 pandemic mural on Liquorice Way, Pontefract (21st June 2020).jpg

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 08:22, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This is one of a few graffiti pictures uploaded by Mtaylor848, that have been tagged for deletion. As per my comments on the first one I noticed - I agree that there is no FoP applicable in UK for "graphic works" e.g. murals COM:FOP UK#Freedom of panorama refers. However, this is graffiti (an illegal mural) so the former provisions are not fully applicable, in my opinion. I think the specific Commons policy at COM:GRAFFITI applies and the file should be kept accordingly. The situation with the file can be covered, and made clear to others, by tagging the file with the non-free graffiti tag. Thanks. Crep171166 (talk) 19:15, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment This is legally painted murals, and I see no reason to deny the painter's copyright. --A1Cafel (talk) 09:24, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment On what basis is it legally painted? I can find no record of its commission?

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 20:10, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:COVID-19 pandemic mural on Southgate, Pontefract (21st June 2020).jpg

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 08:22, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This is one of a few graffiti pictures uploaded by Mtaylor848, that have been tagged for deletion. As per my comments on the first one I noticed - I agree that there is no FoP applicable in UK for "graphic works" e.g. murals COM:FOP UK#Freedom of panorama refers. However, this is graffiti (an illegal mural) so the former provisions are not fully applicable, in my opinion. I think the specific Commons policy at COM:GRAFFITI applies and the file should be kept accordingly. The situation with the file can be covered, and made clear to others, by tagging the file with the non-free graffiti tag. Thanks. Crep171166 (talk) 19:16, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment This is legally painted murals, and I see no reason to deny the painter's copyright. --A1Cafel (talk) 09:24, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment On what basis is it legally painted? I can find no record of its commission?

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 20:09, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Maude Collen Nlm nlmuid-101441968.jpg

probably still under copyright. The NLM doesn't believe this to be public domain, compare this image's source to this one the NLM identifies as probably in the public domain. Image was dated August 1973, so this is probably still under copyright. The only archive of the page on the Internet Archive lists it as possibly under copyright protection. Therapyisgood (talk) 14:11, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 20:06, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Кащеева Вера Сергеевна 3.jpg

no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be PD PlanespotterA320 (talk) 17:10, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 20:05, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Isaev2.jpg

no indication of early enough PUBLICATION (pre-1946) to be PD in Russia US PlanespotterA320 (talk) 18:40, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept, depicted person died in 1886, photos about him are in public domain due to age. Taivo (talk) 16:39, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Isaev2.jpg

No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be PD in country of origin (Russia) DESPITE how old it is (to the previous closing admin - even pre-1917 works must be published before the cutoff date, but there is no indication of that) PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:02, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as {{PD-old-assumed}} --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:08, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- But the author is not known here, and point 1 of the licence does not apply since it is a work by an unknown author. Russian law requires that works by unknown authors be published at least 70 years ago to be PD (works by unknown authors and known authors get treated differently under law). There is no evidence this file meets those publication requirements for works by unknown authors. The 70 years after the death of author clause is ONLY for works by KNOWN authors, NOT works by unknown authors (all works by unknown authors must be published at least 70 years to be PD in Russia, no matter how old).--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 17:16, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Looking at the relevant statute (Book IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation No. 230-FZ of December 18, 2006, art. 1281), a work is in the public domain in the following circumstances (numbering matches that in statute, omitting 4 and 5):
    - 1) Known author → Life 70
    - 2) Unknown author, published during lifetime → 70 years after publication, which is necessarily less than life 70
    - 3) Known or unknown author, published after author's death → If published within 70 years of death, 70 years after publication. Otherwise, PD.
  - Applying this to the instant case, using the consensus-backed assumption of death being 50 years after creation of the work (here, 1930):
    - If the work was published after creation (before 1880) but before 1930, the work is in the public domain, because it was published during the life of the author.
    - If the work was published after 1930 but before 1950, the work is in the public domain, because it would have expired already.
    - If the work was published after 1950 but before 2000, the work is copyrighted.
    - If the work was published after 2000, the work is in the public domain, because it was not published within 70 years of the author's death.
  - COM:PRP states that "where there is significant doubt about the freedom of a particular file, it should be deleted" (emphasis in original). I think it is significantly more likely that it was not published in that span (the work was more likely either published shortly after creation (and thus be in the public domain) or digitized and published (which would be post-2000, making it public domain) and there is no evidence that the work was first published in the 50-year span that would make the work copyrighted. Thus, I don't think that there is the requisite "significant doubt" (emphasis in original) as to the work's status that COM:PRP requires.
  - This logic goes for this batch of nominations (I won't copy-paste it); however, I admit that it is more persuasive as to the oldest works. Best, --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 21:50, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    - You still don't get it. Whatever the heck the unknown author lifetime's actually was is COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT for works by unknown author, because it has NO bearing on the copyright status. The 50-years after creation rule on Commons for assuming author lifetime is ONLY for works when author lifetime affects copyright (ie, works by KNOWN authors with UNKNOWN year of death). Assuming a year of death for an unknown author of a work and then trying to label it public domain using rules about works by known authors, ignoring the separate rules for works by unknown authors that the work actually must follow, IS NOT OK. Point 2 should be changed as "2) Unknown author → 70 years after publication. No exceptions" No "lifetime" nonsense. Don't even think about author lifetime, it's a non-entity in the case of works with unknown authors. Because we do not know who the author of the work is, we must find the REQUIRED evidence that it was PUBLISHED at least 70 years ago (for this item to be PD in country of origin) in order for it to be allowed on Commons, and the burden of proof is on the uploader to provide the information. If no proof of publication early can be found in order to prove such status, then it must be deleted, no matter how old the work is. "I think it was probably published" "it looks really old, so it's got to have been published a long time ago" etc is not sufficient. Proving a negative is impossible (like proving that something WASN'T published), and it is unreasonable to flip the burden of proof in such manner. Publication information must be provided for this item, or it will have to be deleted. Period.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 23:58, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:32, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Isaev Grigorij.jpg

No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be PD in country of origin (Russia) DESPITE how old it is (to the previous closing admin - even pre-1917 works must be published before the cutoff date, but there is no indication of that) PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:03, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as {{PD-old-assumed}} --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:08, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Nope. PD-old-assumed is irrelevant to the PD status in Russia for work by unknown author, which requires that works by unknown authors be published at least 70 years ago to be PD (works by unknown authors and known authors get treated differently under law). There is no evidence this file meets those publication requirements for works by unknown authors. The 70 years after the death of author clause is ONLY for works by KNOWN authors, NOT works by unknown authors (all works by unknown authors must be published at least 70 years to be PD in Russia, no metter how old).--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 17:06, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:33, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:German A. Lopatin.jpg

No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be PD in country of origin (Russia) DESPITE how old it is. Under Russian law even pre-1917 works must be published before the cutoff date, but there is no indication of that. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:04, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as {{PD-old-assumed}} --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:08, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Nope. PD-old-assumed is irrelevant to the PD status in Russia for work by unknown author, which requires that works by unknown authors be published at least 70 years ago to be PD (works by unknown authors and known authors get treated differently under law). There is no evidence this file meets those publication requirements for works by unknown authors. The 70 years after the death of author clause is ONLY for works by KNOWN authors, NOT works by unknown authors (all works by unknown authors must be published at least 70 years to be PD in Russia, no metter how old).--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 17:07, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:33, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ananjina Maria.jpg

No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be PD in country of origin (Russia) DESPITE how old it is. Under Russian law even pre-1917 works must be published before the cutoff date, but there is no indication of that. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:04, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as {{PD-old-assumed}} --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:10, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Nope. PD-old-assumed is irrelevant to the PD status in Russia for work by unknown author, which requires that works by unknown authors be published at least 70 years ago to be PD (works by unknown authors and known authors get treated differently under law). There is no evidence this file meets those publication requirements for works by unknown authors. The 70 years after the death of author clause is ONLY for works by KNOWN authors, NOT works by unknown authors (all works by unknown authors must be published at least 70 years to be PD in Russia, no metter how old).--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 17:04, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:33, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Гринберг Христина Григорьевна.jpg

No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be PD in country of origin (Russia) DESPITE how old it is. Under Russian law even pre-1917 works must be published before the cutoff date, but there is no indication of that. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:05, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as {{PD-old-assumed}} --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:10, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Can't be on Commons until it is known to be PD in country of origin (Russia), and that would require 70 years after publication, but there is no evidence of meeting such publication requirements.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 17:02, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It was published for sure, you can see printed letters through the pages. Photo was made before 1900 (she was 43 that year and she is much younger here) and publication style is of 1910s-1930s, no later.--Brunei (talk) 09:26, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Due to letters showing through the other side. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:33, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nikolaj D. Pochitonov.jpg

No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be PD in country of origin (Russia) DESPITE how old it is. Under Russian law even pre-1917 works must be published before the cutoff date, but there is no indication of that. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:05, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:33, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nikolaj K Buch.jpg

No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be PD in country of origin (Russia) DESPITE how old it is. Under Russian law even pre-1917 works must be published before the cutoff date, but there is no indication of that. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:05, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:33, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Michail Drej.jpg

No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be PD in country of origin (Russia) DESPITE how old it is. Under Russian law even pre-1917 works must be published before the cutoff date, but there is no indication of that. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:06, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:33, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:M Ju Asenbrenner.jpg

no indication of early enough PUBLICATION (pre-1946) to be PD in Russia US PlanespotterA320 (talk) 18:49, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept, 1875 photo is enough old for public domain. Taivo (talk) 16:55, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:M Ju Asenbrenner.jpg

No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be PD in country of origin (Russia) DESPITE how old it is. Under Russian law even pre-1917 works must be published before the cutoff date, but there is no indication of that. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:07, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per {{PD-old-assumed}}. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 15:55, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Nope. PD-old-assumed is irrelevant to the PD status in Russia for work by unknown author, which requires that works by unknown authors be published at least 70 years ago to be PD (works by unknown authors and known authors get treated differently under law). There is no evidence this file meets those publication requirements for works by unknown authors. The 70 years after the death of author clause is ONLY for works by KNOWN authors, NOT works by unknown authors (all works by unknown authors must be published at least 70 years to be PD in Russia, no metter how old).--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 17:12, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:34, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lev Gartman.jpg

No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be PD in country of origin (Russia) (no matter how old it is). Under Russian law even pre-1917 works must be published before the cutoff date, but there is no indication of that. Point one does not apply because it is not by a known credited author and confirmed to be published early enough. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:12, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete subject died in 1908, no indication of creation date. Thus, {{PD-old-assumed}} does not apply until 2028; so delete until then. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:03, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Can't be undeleted until it is known to be PD in country of origin (Russia), and that would require 70 years after publication (long after 2028 as far as we know right now)--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 17:01, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:35, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo AlfaRomeo 1925 1946 noBG.jpg

Non-de minimis representation of a copyrighted logo Ytoyoda (talk) 19:24, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, the original picture is at commons under the license 2.0.There is written: “You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially”. I understand what you mean, but there is absolut no modification or change in the logo himself, I just removed the background (car) for a clearer look to the "untouched, copyrighted Logo". I also gave full credit to the original file/source and the author. I still think the picture is okay. best regards, --Auge=mit (talk) 06:46, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Auge=mit: If you crop a photo just to show a copyright element, it doesn't matter what the license on the original photo is. Please see COM:DW. Alfa Romeo did not release the logo under a Creative Commons license, and the photographer cannot relicense the photo on behalf of Alfa Romeo. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:38, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep This deletion request is nonsense. The logo of Alfa Romeo is just a combination of elements of the coat of arms of Milan and the coat of arms of the Duchy of Milan. Both used elements are centuries old. Thus the logo is clearly de-minimis. Furthermore cars fall under freedom of panorama. Chaddy (talk) 17:58, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Chaddy: I'm not sure what you mean by Commons:De minimis here. I'm guessing you're saying that it's a derivative work of works that are out of copyright and below the threshold of originality? Could you show the coat of arms that the serpent design is based on? I think it's a more convincing argument for this version of the logo vs the 2015 version, but it could still be above the threshold of originality. Ytoyoda (talk) 18:17, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As I already said: The logo only consists of already known heraldic elements. Also the combination of these two symbols isn't a creative enough effort to reach the threshold of orginality.

This is the coat of arms of the Duchy which itself only reused the snake of this coat of arms of the Visconti. Chaddy (talk) 18:37, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, you are right according "de minimis". I didn't want to refer to that but to threshold of orginality. Chaddy (talk) 18:43, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ytoyoda, okay, I understand what you mean. I would lie, if I say I'm happy with that, but I have to accept... I like to inform you, that there is a third Alfa Romeo-badge, that got a “make-over” by myself... best regards, --Auge=mit (talk) 09:07, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:36, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Николай Мешков с другом И. Королевым 1875.jpg

no indication of early enough PUBLICATION be public domain in both Russia and the US PlanespotterA320 (talk) 18:16, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept, 1875 Russian photos are in public do main due to age. Taivo (talk) 16:47, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Николай Мешков с другом И. Королевым 1875.jpg

No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be PD in country of origin (Russia) DESPITE how old it is. Under Russian law even pre-1917 works must be published before the cutoff date, but there is no indication of that. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:07, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Taivo's explanation here and elsewhere. 1875... --E4024 (talk) 22:27, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Nope. Even Russian photos from the 1800's are not PD by default and must have an early enough publication. Tavio's explanation is wrong.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 13:36, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per {{PD-old-assumed}}. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 15:54, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Nope. PD-old-assumed is irrelevant to the PD status in Russia for work by unknown author, which requires that works by unknown authors be published at least 70 years ago to be PD (works by unknown authors and known authors get treated differently under law). There is no evidence this file meets those publication requirements for works by unknown authors. The 70 years after the death of author clause is ONLY for works by KNOWN authors, NOT works by unknown authors (all works by unknown authors must be published at least 70 years to be PD in Russia, no metter how old).--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 17:12, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: it is highly unlikely that this photo has not been distributed in the 19th century; it is highly unlikely that this photo is not in PD. --Materialscientist (talk) 08:43, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Marija V. Grjaznova.jpg

No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be PD in country of origin (Russia) (no matter how old it is). Under Russian law even pre-1917 works must be published before the cutoff date, but there is no indication of that. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:08, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per {{PD-old-assumed}}. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 15:56, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Nope. PD-old-assumed is irrelevant to the PD status in Russia for work by unknown author, which requires that works by unknown authors be published at least 70 years ago to be PD (works by unknown authors and known authors get treated differently under law). There is no evidence this file meets those publication requirements for works by unknown authors. The 70 years after the death of author clause is ONLY for works by KNOWN authors, NOT works by unknown authors (all works by unknown authors must be published at least 70 years to be PD in Russia, no metter how old).--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 17:12, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: it is highly unlikely that this photo has not been distributed in the 19th century; it is highly unlikely that this photo is not in PD. --Materialscientist (talk) 08:44, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jakimova Anna.jpg

No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be PD in country of origin (Russia) (no matter how old it is). Under Russian law even pre-1917 works must be published before the cutoff date, but there is no indication of that. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:09, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Yakimova.jpg. (We should leave in peace the XIXth Century, IMHO.) --E4024 (talk) 22:22, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Wanting to keep old photos doesn't change the lack of sufficient publication information.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:24, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per {{PD-old-assumed}}. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 15:57, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Nope. PD-old-assumed is irrelevant to the PD status in Russia for work by unknown author, which requires that works by unknown authors be published at least 70 years ago to be PD (works by unknown authors and known authors get treated differently under law). There is no evidence this file meets those publication requirements for works by unknown authors. The 70 years after the death of author clause is ONLY for works by KNOWN authors, NOT works by unknown authors (all works by unknown authors must be published at least 70 years to be PD in Russia, no metter how old).--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 17:12, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: it is highly unlikely that this photo has not been distributed in the 19th century; it is highly unlikely that this photo is not in PD. --Materialscientist (talk) 08:44, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Makar Teterka.jpg

No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be PD in country of origin (Russia) (no matter how old it is). Under Russian law even pre-1917 works must be published before the cutoff date, but there is no indication of that. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:09, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per {{PD-old-assumed}}. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 15:57, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Nope. PD-old-assumed is irrelevant to the PD status in Russia for work by unknown author, which requires that works by unknown authors be published at least 70 years ago to be PD (works by unknown authors and known authors get treated differently under law). There is no evidence this file meets those publication requirements for works by unknown authors. The 70 years after the death of author clause is ONLY for works by KNOWN authors, NOT works by unknown authors (all works by unknown authors must be published at least 70 years to be PD in Russia, no metter how old).--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 17:13, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: it is highly unlikely that this photo has not been distributed in the 19th century; it is highly unlikely that this photo is not in PD. --Materialscientist (talk) 08:46, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Grinevickij Ignatij.jpg

No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be PD in country of origin (Russia) (no matter how old it is). Under Russian law even pre-1917 works must be published before the cutoff date, but there is no indication of that. Point one does not apply because it is not by a known credited author and confirmed to be published early enough. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:12, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as {{PD-Russia-1996}}: died pre-1942, so no need for publication. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:00, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Nope. Works published posthumously get copyright extension with copyright starting on publication date. But the author is not known here, and point 1 of the licence does not apply since it is a work by an unknown author. Russian law requires that works by unknown authors be published at least 70 years ago to be PD (works by unknown authors and known authors get treated differently under law). There is no evidence this file meets those publication requirements for works by unknown authors. The 70 years after the death of author clause is ONLY for works by KNOWN authors, NOT works by unknown authors (all works by unknown authors must be published at least 70 years to be PD in Russia, no matter how old).--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 17:15, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: it is highly unlikely that this photo has not been distributed in the 19th century; it is highly unlikely that this photo is not in PD. --Materialscientist (talk) 08:45, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]