Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/06/22
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
Out of COM:SCOPE (en:The moon exports and en:The Moon Exports). Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:27, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, no educational value. Taivo (talk) 09:43, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
I don't want to keep my picture. please delete my picture Al amin AAS (talk) 03:08, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope. --E4024 (talk) 03:11, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 10:41, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
dark Nitai Chandra (talk) 07:27, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 11:47, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Out of scopes SCP-2000 06:24, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep IMO it is in the scope. It shows clearly that people using the telescope to observe the eclipse. --A1Cafel (talk) 13:01, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Obviously in scope, if you actually look at the title, description or categories. Brianjd (talk) 13:20, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Sorry, my bad. --SCP-2000 13:33, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn by nominator; no other users supported deletion. Brianjd (talk) 13:36, 22 June 2020 (UTC) (non-admin close)
Copyright Martín Arauz (talk) 10:21, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio & uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 12:12, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Accidently chose the wrong file for the upload, which doesn't have the needed license Rbndckr (talk) 15:57, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 16:20, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
This crop fails de minimis. This was created in contravention of the explicit {{De minimis}} tag placed on the original image. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 06:14, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- I am sorry about that, Coffeeandcrumbs. I didn't notice the tag, and have never heard of that before. It absolutely sounds as if this cropped image should be deleted.CaroleHenson (talk) 16:27, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- @CaroleHenson: no worries at all. Freedom of panorama and de minimis are very complicated concepts that 99% of the community does not understand. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 18:37, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy close per uploader's consent. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:04, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Track sounds like a Track on Spotify Mtt1734 (talk) 19:34, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedied per G7, as uploader requested deletion on day of upload. --Túrelio (talk) 20:23, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Because it is Nonsense Hobbsharvey0 (talk) 20:41, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense by Android app user. --Achim (talk) 21:01, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Because it is Nonsense Hobbsharvey0 (talk) 20:42, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request by Android app user. --Achim (talk) 21:01, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Because it is Nonsense Hobbsharvey0 (talk) 20:42, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request by Android app user. --Achim (talk) 21:01, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Because it is Nonsense Hobbsharvey0 (talk) 20:43, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request by Android app user. --Achim (talk) 21:02, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Because it is Nonsense Hobbsharvey0 (talk) 20:45, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request by Android app user. --Achim (talk) 21:02, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Because it is Nonsense Hobbsharvey0 (talk) 20:46, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request by Android app user. --Achim (talk) 21:02, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Because it is Nonsense Hobbsharvey0 (talk) 20:46, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request by Android app user. --Achim (talk) 21:03, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Because it is Random photo from internet Hobbsharvey0 (talk) 20:48, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request by Android app user. --Achim (talk) 21:03, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Because it is Blurry Hobbsharvey0 (talk) 20:49, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request by Android app user. --Achim (talk) 21:04, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
повторяется Валентина Никора (talk) 21:02, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request, replaced by File:Пестель, Павел Иванович, 1821-1825.jpg. --Achim (talk) 21:10, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
著作権の関係性もありますし、許可をたとえ取っていたとしてもやっぱりいけないことはいけないですし、なら削除したほうが一層早いかなと思ったので。 ゆっくりねこ (talk) 08:16, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 22:25, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
I am author on this logo, I am a new user on commons, I want to upload this logo under the fair use, but i made a mistake and that reason I want to delete this logo. Foysalur Rahman Shuvo (talk) 12:05, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 22:26, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
No user page 2603:9500:E504:C100:707B:CA3:FA30:A2D 15:48, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense or test. --Achim (talk) 16:05, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Disscuss. 2603:9500:E504:C100:BCFE:2B01:5D5F:A023 13:56, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. If you are User:FOX 52 login please. --Achim (talk) 13:59, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep appears to be some sort of possible vandalism - FOX 52 (talk) 21:51, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Vandalism. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 22:27, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope. E4024 (talk) 03:10, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:05, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Promotion of scientific racism. This has negative educational value and is user created nonsense. At the time of raising the uploader account is blocked, and the file is not in use. Fæ (talk) 18:22, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Also refer to m:Talk:Black_Lives_Matter#Scientific_racism. --Fæ (talk) 18:23, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by VivekAdivasi. Brianjd (talk) 10:49, 23 June 2020 (UTC) (non-admin close)
Poor quality and possibly not free 2600:387:1:805:0:0:0:70 18:24, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep I'm the uploader. Agree the quality could be better, but it's what we've got; we have no other free images of this notable actress. It's not terrible, she is recognizable. If you have a better one, please do release it. It has been released, I mistyped a / for a : in the permission link, it's corrected now. --GRuban (talk) 18:31, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep – Agree with GRuban: something is better than nothing, and if it's an allowed free image, it should be kept. IJBall (talk) 19:42, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: No valid reason for deletion. Widely in use; OTRS tag added by licence reviewer. Brianjd (talk) 11:13, 23 June 2020 (UTC) (non-admin close)
Photomontage. How do we know it is not a derivative work? Where is the original material? E4024 (talk) 02:19, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Vitold Muratov. --VLu (talk) 05:57, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: speedily per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Vitold Muratov. --A.Savin 13:10, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
A free file overwritten by a derivative work that's unlikely to be free. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:30, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- I've reverted to the original version of the file, which seems valid. Spike 'em (talk) 14:58, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks - we just need the 2nd version of the image to be deleted, since it's an obvious copyvio. Ytoyoda (talk) 15:03, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, 2nd version deleted as suspected copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 15:21, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
No evidence of permission. Most likely a copyright violation. Woko Sapien (talk) 00:23, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 14:28, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
No evidence of permission. Most likely a copyright violation. Woko Sapien (talk) 00:24, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 14:14, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Low-quality chemical structure with opaque (grey) background & in small resolution. Have File:Skeletal formula of Vermixocin A.svg as high-quality chemical structure. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 22:06, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Could you also do File:Vermixocin B.png in the same orientation as your replacement of the nominated image? These two chemicals are discussed together, and the replacement of "A" changed the perspective. That's not a factual problem, but it would be useful to have them in matching perspective to discuss them as a set. DMacks (talk) 22:31, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- @DMacks: Yes, of course! I have uploaded File:Skeletal formula of Vermixocin B.svg in same orientation as replacement for that file as well. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 22:50, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete both File:Vermixocin A.png and File:Vermixocin B.png per nom ("B" has all the same problems as "A"). DMacks (talk) 22:54, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 18:35, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Unused out of scope pictures of a non-notable individual (ro:Dj George A)
Gikü (talk) 05:24, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:22, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
No FOP for artwork in the U.S.
- File:Artwork along University Ave W by Art Crop in St Paul, Minnesota (50023486858).jpg
- File:Artwork along University Ave W by Art Crop in St Paul, Minnesota (50023486943).jpg
- File:Artwork along University Ave W by Art Crop in St Paul, Minnesota (50023487003).jpg
- File:Artwork along University Ave W by Art Crop in St Paul, Minnesota (50024032211).jpg
- File:Artwork along University Ave W by Art Crop in St Paul, Minnesota (50024032326).jpg
- File:Artwork along University Ave W by Art Crop in St Paul, Minnesota (50024292282).jpg
- File:Artwork along University Ave W by Art Crop in St Paul, Minnesota (50024292347).jpg
- File:Juneteenth in Minneapolis (50025439193).jpg
--- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 05:33, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:23, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Unused/OoS logo
Gbawden (talk) 07:00, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:28, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Not released under a free license. The terms prohibit any modification and only permit fair use including personal and family reproduction for non-profit purposed only.
- File:20060615 假陸軍軍官學校舉辦之大漠英雄─成吉思汗紀念展 13.jpg
- File:20060616 假陸軍軍官學校舉辦之大漠英雄─成吉思汗紀念展 02.jpg
- File:20060616 假陸軍軍官學校舉辦之大漠英雄─成吉思汗紀念展 12.jpg
- File:20061121 陸軍司令部「大漠英雄-成吉思汗紀念展」 01.jpg
- File:20061121 陸軍司令部「大漠英雄-成吉思汗紀念展」 02.jpg
- File:20061121 陸軍司令部「大漠英雄-成吉思汗紀念展」 03.jpg
- File:20061121 陸軍司令部「大漠英雄-成吉思汗紀念展」 04.jpg
- File:20061121 陸軍司令部「大漠英雄-成吉思汗紀念展」 05.jpg
- File:20061121 陸軍司令部「大漠英雄-成吉思汗紀念展」 06.jpg
- File:20061121 陸軍司令部「大漠英雄-成吉思汗紀念展」 07.jpg
- File:20061121 陸軍司令部「大漠英雄-成吉思汗紀念展」 08.jpg
- File:Army (ROCA) General Hu Chen-pu 陸軍上將胡鎮埔 (20061121 陸軍司令部「大漠英雄-成吉思汗紀念展」 03).jpg
- File:Army (ROCA) Lieutenant General Liu Hsiang-pin 陸軍中將劉湘濱 (20060616 假陸軍軍官學校舉辦之大漠英雄─成吉思汗紀念展 12).jpg
- File:Army (ROCA) Lieutenant General Pang Yu-tung 陸軍中將龐豫銅 (20060616 假陸軍軍官學校舉辦之大漠英雄─成吉思汗紀念展 12).jpg
- File:Army (ROCA) Lieutenant General Wang Gen-lin 陸軍中將王根林 (20060615 假陸軍軍官學校舉辦之大漠英雄─成吉思汗紀念展 13).jpg
Wcam (talk) 12:09, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:36, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rammstein137 (talk · contribs)
editunused, uncategorised files. Not notable band
Estopedist1 (talk) 17:30, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:37, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
unused, uncategorized. 0 links even in Polish Wikipedia. Not notable person
Estopedist1 (talk) 17:42, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:38, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
files from Internet. Not own work
- File:Ава Арчер Сайм-Ривз и Дженифер Сайм.jpg
- File:Jennifer Syme.jpg
- File:Keanu Reeves.jpg
- File:ShirleyHenderson.jpg
Estopedist1 (talk) 17:57, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:39, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:19, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chethanrwiki (talk · contribs)
editUnlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:19, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:18, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:17, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Eaguilar2020 (talk · contribs)
editOut of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:15, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not private media repository. Only (remaining) uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 14:45, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:15, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope - advertising Lotje (talk) 14:45, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:15, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:15, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused promotional materials of questionable notability.
- File:Hazem Dmour.jpg
- File:حازم سالم الضمور .jpg
- File:STRATEGIECS THINK TANK.jpg
- File:STRATEGIECS.png
- File:شعارستراتيجكس.png
- File:معتمدة.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:13, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:12, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bilalshafikamboh (talk · contribs)
editOut of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used or used in self-promotional draft.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:11, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:11, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Elreportccs (talk · contribs)
editUnlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:11, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshot of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:10, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:10, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
unused, low quality, spam, no location given
Estopedist1 (talk) 05:32, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 08:32, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not private media repository. Only (remaining) uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 14:59, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:09, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jordansons (talk · contribs)
editHistorical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:07, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:06, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:06, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:DrAlanees.jpg
- File:عبدالحكيم الأنيس يهدي جلالة الملك محمد السادس كتاب عشر رسائل في التفسير وعلوم القرآن لجلال الدين السيوطي.png
- File:د. عبدالحكيم الأنيس يفوز ببرنامج دبي للأداء الحكومي المتميز ويتسلم الدرع التذكارية من صاحب السمو الشيخ محمد بن راشد آل مكتوم.jpg
- File:د. عبد الحكيم الأنيس.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:05, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:05, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:04, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PhotoArchive11215 (talk · contribs)
editOut of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:First Apartment.jpg
- File:Boy sitting in front of a window.jpg
- File:Pretty boy wearing a fedora.jpg
- File:An amber colored gentleman.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:04, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wikipedia20156 (talk · contribs)
edit- File:Oo7pKS18YGI.jpg #low quality, random collection of bottles
- File:Oo7pKS25YGI.jpg #out of scope
- File:Oo7pKS25YGI.jpg
- File:Oo7pKS18YGI.jpg
Estopedist1 (talk) 16:32, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:00, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not private media repository. Only (remaining) uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 17:52, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:58, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not private media repository. Only (remaining) uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 18:02, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:58, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Purely disruptive, of no use to any project; user who created this is blocked on en. Ohnoitsjamie (talk) 18:03, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Hey, I'd appreciate it if you left this up. I worked really hard on this graphic. Its not meant to be disruptive, it is literally just my catchphrase. Thanks DaltoUprising (talk) 18:13, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: by Taivo. --Didym (talk) 19:57, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. Nahid Hossain (talk) 18:04, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:57, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Far too low resolution in order for it to be considered as own work. Most probably scanned (see picture quality) from some newspaper or other review. Glorious 93 (talk) 18:07, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:55, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
unused, uncategorised, no location given. Only (remaining) uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 18:10, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:55, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Unused porn-like file of little value. — regards, Revi 18:22, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Educationally worthless. AshFriday (talk) 23:09, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - Clearly been photoshopped in some manner (see rogue bra strap on the left) and we have other suitable photos. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:12, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:55, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Unused porn-like file of little value. — regards, Revi 18:23, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Worthless, poor quality, redundant and therefore out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 23:10, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:55, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 18:23, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:54, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not private media repository. Only (remaining) uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 18:28, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:54, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
I've replaced it with a more useful version Valereee (talk) 18:33, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:54, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
bad quality, unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 18:36, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:53, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
unused, uncategorized, seems to be a test file, probably out of scope. Estopedist1 (talk) 18:43, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:52, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 18:44, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:52, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mohammad junaid jan (talk · contribs)
editunused, uncategorized, probably out of scope
- File:My sketch i made it.jpg
- File:This my image- - - - - - - -Click by junaid iqbal-In-Dera nawab sahib Cantt- - - - 2014-06-23 16-02.jpg
Estopedist1 (talk) 18:45, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:51, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
too small, unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 18:54, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:50, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
no location given, unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 19:27, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:49, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Screenshot from a film? See https://xw.qq.com/cmsid/20191106A0PQMY00 which predates the Commons upload. Stefan2 (talk) 19:39, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:48, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not private media repository. Only (remaining) uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 19:40, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:47, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, COM:OOS Frodar (talk) 19:41, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:47, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope material. Not real educational purpose here. If my Spanish is correct what is written here is "Informations - Lower divisions". I really don't see how this could be used on Wikipedia.🤔 Glorious 93 (talk) 19:42, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:47, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
unused and uncategorised file. Looks like some sort of personal artwork. Only (remaining) uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 19:56, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:47, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Not used in any article. Vanity selfie. Out of scope Timtrent (talk) 19:57, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:46, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
photoshopped? Spammy file name and description. Unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. Estopedist1 (talk) 20:11, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:46, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Because it is Nonsense Hobbsharvey0 (talk) 20:47, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:44, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
low quality, Google search doesn't know what means "Melekus Homus". No location given. Only (remaining) uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 20:56, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:43, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
unused and uncategorised files. (1) Empty image. (2) Personal files, Commons is not private media repository.
Estopedist1 (talk) 20:58, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:42, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
COM:SPAM. Self-promotion JTP (talk • contribs) 21:21, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:42, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope material. No real educational purpose here. Glorious 93 (talk) 22:06, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:41, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE. Also might be not own work by the buttons in the bottom. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 22:10, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:39, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 06:08, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:20, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Copyright holder Photography Alexander van Berge-styling Kamer 465 per exif, needs permission Gbawden (talk) 07:00, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:19, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
OoS logos/art - uploader hasn't edited since 2013
- File:Mogajim Hamza Arabic Hip hop Old school Culture.png
- File:How el Gjam turn to the old school hip hop records.png
Gbawden (talk) 07:05, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:18, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not private media repository. Only (remaining) uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 07:06, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:18, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not private media repository. Only (remaining) uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 07:07, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:18, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vishnu K S (talk · contribs)
editunused and uncategorised files. Commons is not private media repository. The second image is with random horse, low quality, no useful description. This file is in use, but only in personal/random gallery
Estopedist1 (talk) 07:11, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:17, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 07:17, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:14, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
fanrasy diagram from nationstates.net (https://www.nationstates.net/nation=north_belland ), out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 07:46, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:14, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
fantasy diagram from nationstates.net (https://www.nationstates.net/nation=north_belland ), out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 07:47, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:14, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
It is very dubious this the creator's own work and they hold a copyright for it. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 08:06, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:13, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
It is very dubious this the creator's own work and they hold a copyright for it. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 08:07, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:13, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
It is very dubious this the creator's own work and they hold a copyright for it. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 08:07, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:13, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Copyrights Leonardo.G G (talk) 23:27, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation. Photographer should confirm license via OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 09:33, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, unlikely to be {{Own work}} as claimed. Photographer should confirm authorship and license by following the instructions on OTRS. For the record, this is a different photo than the one deleted 2 years ago. Storkk (talk) 08:17, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:12, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
I highly dopubt that this image is the uploaders own work Hangman'sDeath (talk) 08:20, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:12, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gricey1981 (talk · contribs)
editPhoto by Void Magazine - needs permission
Gbawden (talk) 08:44, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:09, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:52, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:09, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Not own work per the watermark bottom right Gbawden (talk) 09:00, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:08, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Seems to be a fantasy diagram of some sort: Kazakhstan doesn't have such a large senate! Slashme (talk) 09:08, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:08, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
temporary image, Author and uploader request for deletion Bayhaqi Saputra (talk) 09:12, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:08, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Seems to be a fantasy diagram. Web search for the title gives no results and the party names are implausible. Slashme (talk) 09:26, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:06, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Unused slogan with no explanation. No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 11:03, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:02, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Unused slogan with no explanation. No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 11:05, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:02, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
personal photo
Ashim nep (talk) 11:05, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:01, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
likely out of scope copyright issues Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:15, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:01, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
OoS, only upload of user Gbawden (talk) 11:27, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:01, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
User's bio, out of scope. Achim (talk) 11:44, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:55, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
False license claim. Derivative of [1] or more likely [2], so not "own work" by this user and also no indication this is a free image. Guy 12:05, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, looks like copyvio. Buidhe (talk) 02:10, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:55, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
no permission, unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 12:18, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:53, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Graphic is based on non-free imagery and was only being used for advertising/promotion on en-wiki (by a now-blocked user). See https://tineye.com/search/619219a5bcec11156dac4cfe851bc1445baf12ac?page=1 Nick Moyes (talk) 13:15, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:53, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Graphic is based on non-free imagery and was only being used for advertising/promotion on en-wiki (by a now-blocked user). See https://tineye.com/search/619219a5bcec11156dac4cfe851bc1445baf12ac?page=1 Nick Moyes (talk) 13:16, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:53, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Fantasy diagram, out of project scope. Slashme (talk) 13:24, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:53, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope personal image Nizil Shah (talk) 13:47, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:52, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope Lotje (talk) 13:51, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:51, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:53, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:51, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Quite probable copyright violation. Source is unlikely "own work". 85.153.226.132 13:54, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:51, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:56, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:51, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope Lotje (talk) 14:05, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: in scope, but copyio. --Didym (talk) 21:48, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope Lotje (talk) 14:05, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: in scope, but copyvio. --Didym (talk) 21:48, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Out of Scope personal image for self promotion Nizil Shah (talk) 14:12, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:48, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope personal photo Nizil Shah (talk) 14:13, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:48, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Single contribution by this member. Out of scope, with a silly description, and probably just some defamation of some sort. Anvilaquarius (talk) 14:18, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:46, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Unidentified individual, but likely this TikTok user. Although this image uploaded to Commons has been altered by the adding of the product in his hand. No evidence of permission to use file. Senator2029 14:26, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:46, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Not the uploader's own work: https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZivKbtDVT40F7pd7mRHuAO_1pIxrUZ8G4ToGUNtC9nOIW8Cwi6-4YHgOfHdM8VbowuMVmd_1L9iWGBH45_1XQAIpYvXXAE0XXv-kEy-movb8grf3KiuWwxI4Ts998MOuKN-IUdgjpt_135Xduokb0RTBz2Mu6QEAw8xL6OxCPJPnQBDG-VlgZbMj9rYL6CPmMmIwo30LitESEqxICRzhtIfgLvL6PYDyPXszWBJwIg7_1-6uTb_1c_1qRh19ZtEaBPiW_1S9AaYSEdXv-iOWl89i-485TvtEGE1RiPHhD-pSCLPhTVAVvp6_1EGtwv_1fj9LGu2dMhx-8kILrKpu_1RSnXSM6_14FQADvcjFWg Ytoyoda (talk) 14:31, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Dee03 (talk) 06:27, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:27, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. An unidentified copy of image from an earlier print. Maxinvestigator (talk) 02:12, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 12:17, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:33, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:17, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:33, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:17, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:33, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:18, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:34, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:17, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:34, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:17, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:34, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:18, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:34, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:18, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:34, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:18, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:35, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:19, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:35, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:19, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:35, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:19, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:35, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:18, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:35, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:19, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:35, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:19, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:35, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:19, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:35, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:19, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:36, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:20, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:36, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:20, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:36, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:20, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:36, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:20, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:36, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:21, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:37, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:21, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:37, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:21, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:37, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:21, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:37, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:21, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:37, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:21, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Facebook image per Metadata, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 03:23, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:22, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Facebook image per Metadata, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 03:23, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:22, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Facebook image per Metadata, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 03:23, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:23, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope unused photo of a non-notable individual (ro:Stoie Gabriel). Gikü (talk) 04:53, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:25, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Unused out of scope image of a non-notable individual (ro:Ioan Groșescu) Gikü (talk) 05:41, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:26, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted material-under appeal Audioboss (talk) 05:41, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
This material was nominated for speedy deletion. I am appealing it to be kept. The image is a sketch drawing or illustration from a public domain source: own traditional drawings and illustrations with component rendering in digital art. Image used as a reference from a known public domain site:
reference Source: photos and illustrations dated 1942 from Mandragore database of the Bibliothèque Nationale de France
The underlying source material is in the public domain for the following reasons:
This work is in the public domain in France for one of the following reasons:
Please note that moral rights still apply when the work is in the public domain. They encompass, among others, the right to the respect of the author's name, quality and work (CPI art. L121-1). Attribution therefore remains mandatory.
|
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it meets three requirements:
For background information, see the explanations on Non-U.S. copyrights.
Note: This tag should not be used for sound recordings. |
Français : Cette image est une reproduction d'une œuvre bidimensionnelle tombée dans le domaine public. Pour cette raison, elle est considérée aux États-Unis d'Amérique comme une œuvre du domaine public.
En France, il est possible (mais pas absolument certain) que cette reproduction photographique tombe sous le droit d'auteur du photographe, à savoir la Bibliothèque nationale de France. Cette dernière nous a cependant donné autorisation pour l'utilisation de ses photographies sur nos sites et supports CD/DVD. Nous remercions la BNF de son aimable collaboration. Cette image peut être consultée sur le site de la base Mandragore sous la cote {{{1}}} folio {{{2}}}. Voir aussi : Category:Mandragore images.English: This image is a reproduction of a bidimensional map, now in the public domain. For this reason, it is in the public domain in the United States of America.
In France, it is possible (but not certain) that this photographic reproduction is copyrighted by the administration who performed it, i.e. the Bibliothèque nationale de France (BNF). However, BNF gave us the authorization to use any image from their database on our sites and CD/DVDs. We thank BNF for its kind collaboration. This image may be consulted on the Mandragore database under the classification mark {{{1}}} folio {{{2}}}. See also Category:Mandragore images. |
Updated to the proper source material origin.
--Audioboss (talk) 21:34, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Missing permission for original photo. Send permission and/or clarifications via COM:OTRS. --Wdwd (talk) 12:42, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
This picture is not the "own work" of the uploader: it has the watermark of a Czech website, but is more likely a press picture provided by Peugeot, as it's also used in a Spanish site, a British one and a Dutch one. And most probably in several others... BarnCas (talk) 05:42, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:26, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
And also
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created 2005. No Permission from the sculptor Володимир Шолудько. Микола Василечко (talk) 05:42, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:28, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Appeal against nominated for Speedy Deletion Audioboss (talk) 05:56, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted material-under appeal Audioboss (talk) 05:41, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
This material was nominated for speedy deletion. I am appealing it to be kept. The image is a sketch drawing or illustration from public domain source:
Reference images: exerpts image stills and clip from documentary about Southeast Asian Cinema (2009) produced and broadcast by the Republic of the Philippines - People's Television Network - for the Cultural Center of the Philippines.
This work is in the public domain in the Philippines and possibly other jurisdictions because it is a work created by an officer or employee of the Government of the Philippines or any of its subdivisions and instrumentalities, including government-owned and/or controlled corporations, as part of their regularly prescribed official duties; consequently, any work is ineligible for copyright under the terms of Part IV, Chapter I, Section 171.11 and Part IV, Chapter IV, Section 176 of Republic Act No. 8293 and Republic Act No. 10372, as amended, unless otherwise noted. However, in some instances, the use of this work in the Philippines or elsewhere may be regulated by this law or other laws.
|
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it meets three requirements:
For background information, see the explanations on Non-U.S. copyrights.
Note: This tag should not be used for sound recordings. |
--Audioboss (talk) 08:22, 23 June 2020 (UTC)--Audioboss (talk) 05:56, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason to delete --阿 talk 23:08, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Missing permission for original photo. Send permission and/or clarifications via COM:OTRS. --Wdwd (talk) 12:43, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Appeal against nominated for Speedy Deletion Audioboss (talk) 06:01, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
This material was nominated for speedy deletion. I am appealing it to be kept. The image is a sketch drawing or illustration that I made from photos that I took when I encountered during a meet and greet with Mr. Josep Maria Benet i Jornet during a symposium in Barcelona.
There are other media people present there. It is possible that the same angled photo may appear similar to my reference photo. --Audioboss (talk) 22:51, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
--Audioboss (talk) 06:04, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Missing permission for original photo. Send permission and/or clarifications via COM:OTRS. --Wdwd (talk) 12:38, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Duplicate of the file File:Turkish Barbed wire entanglements near Sedul Bahr Cape Helles 1915.jpg Thats Just Great (talk) 06:02, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: already processed. --Wdwd (talk) 12:32, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
The material shared the same name of the file David Roback.jpg that is already been deleted and is recorded in this archive. The new image is not the same as the deleted file. The deleted original "David Roback" file can be seen in this link:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/44518673@N00/50756857412/in/dateposted-public/
These are not the same image file. They may share the same texture and colors, but they are not certainly the same. I appeal that this post not be deleted.
--Audioboss (talk) 02:03, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
Appeal against nominated for Speedy Deletion Audioboss (talk) 06:05, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
This material was nominated for speedy deletion. I am appealing it to be kept. The image is a sketch drawing or illustration that I made from photos that I took when I encountered during a meet and greet with David Roback when I was working as a student music reviewer for San Jose State University. Other media outlet was present in that meeting. Same pose photos were made by many photographers present including NY Times, Alternative Press, The Guardian, etc. --Audioboss (talk) 06:10, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- This image is clearly a derivative of this New York Times photo and thereby requires a permission from the original photographer. --Túrelio (talk) 12:14, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
I shot the image from same angle as those photographers. You can't be definitely sure that this is from the same camera unless you want to legally hire a forensic photographer to analyze both image shots. Your assessment does not hold any credibility in any copyright court. --Audioboss (talk) 16:59, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Since my photo reference appears similar to copyrighted materials per baseless assessment and without merit of evidence, I appealed for permission to resolve the copyright issue between my photo and the photo from the NY Times from my colleagu., I requested permission from the photographer of the NY Times photo who was my friend- Theodor Boi. He was present during the photo session and owns the copyright of the photo used by NY Times featured on the news outlet:
On Tuesday, June 23, 2020, 10:55:11 AM PDT, Theodore Boi <[email protected]> wrote:
06/23/2020
Hello Michael:
Nice to hear from you again,
Of course, you may use the photograph as your art reference for the purpose that you mentioned.
Best regards,
Theodore
On Tuesday, June 23, 2020, 10:48:07 AM PDT, Michael Angelo Mayo <[email protected]> wrote:
06/23/2020
Printed Matter
231 11th Ave
New York, NY 10001
Greetings Theodore Boi:
I am requesting permission to use your photograph of Dave Roback
reference: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/26/arts/music/david-roback-dead.html
as my art reference for an illustration that I will use for Wikipedia for educational and non-commercial usage.
We took the same angled photo of Dave Roback from our session back in 1990's when you were doing freelance photography work from NY Times and I was for San Jose State University Press. Wikicommons does not agree that the reference that I used was from my camera.
Best regards friend,
Michael Mayo
--Audioboss (talk) 18:31, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: missing permission. Send permission via COM:OTRS. --Wdwd (talk) 12:34, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Appeal against Speedy Deletion Audioboss (talk) 06:13, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
This material was nominated for speedy deletion. I am appealing it to be kept. The image is a sketch drawing or illustration from a public domain source:
The images came from a broadcasted documentary produced by the Philippine Government in the 1970-1980's titled "Modern European Music 1980" that was shot by my late father who was an artist and documentarian who worked for the Cultural Center of the Philippines. All my father's work is transferred to my estate as right of inheritance.
This work is in the public domain in the Philippines and possibly other jurisdictions because it is a work created by an officer or employee of the Government of the Philippines or any of its subdivisions and instrumentalities, including government-owned and/or controlled corporations, as part of their regularly prescribed official duties; consequently, any work is ineligible for copyright under the terms of Part IV, Chapter I, Section 171.11 and Part IV, Chapter IV, Section 176 of Republic Act No. 8293 and Republic Act No. 10372, as amended, unless otherwise noted. However, in some instances, the use of this work in the Philippines or elsewhere may be regulated by this law or other laws.
|
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it meets three requirements:
For background information, see the explanations on Non-U.S. copyrights.
Note: This tag should not be used for sound recordings. |
--Audioboss (talk) 06:14, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Can you show evidence of this source? Hekerui (talk) 12:37, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
Here is a link to the official document regarding source of the reference object that I used: https://www.flickr.com/photos/44518673@N00/50051813381/in/album-72157714845468096/
--Audioboss (talk) 21:47, 29 June 2020 (UTC) --Audioboss (talk) 21:14, 27 June 2020 (UTC) --Audioboss (talk) 21:07, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
--2601:646:8481:3290:8C05:67A6:F762:71EA 20:47, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Missing permission. Send permission and/or clarifications via COM:OTRS. --Wdwd (talk) 12:36, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Appeal against speedy deletion nomination Audioboss (talk) 06:16, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
This material was nominated for speedy deletion. I am appealing it to be kept.
The image is a sketch drawing or illustration that I made from photos and videos that I took of Maura Murphy during a meet and greet in a local bookstore in Dublin, Ireland. Other local media are also present at that time.
--Audioboss (talk) 06:18, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Missing permission for original photos. Send permission and/or clarifications via COM:OTRS. --Wdwd (talk) 12:44, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Also to delete:
- File:IEEEmadC Winners2013-2014.png
I doubt that this file is really licenced under a free licence --Hangman'sDeath (talk) 07:02, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 12:48, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Also to delete:
- File:ICode.png
- File:Talkinenglish.png
- File:School Carpolling.png
- File:Collegiate.png
I highly doubt that this file is licenced under a free licence. There is no indication for it on the source page. Moreover this looks like your typical advertising and is more than likely out of project scope --Hangman'sDeath (talk) 07:06, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 12:49, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Proffesional ice hockey player photo without a permission or any evidence of authorship. Low resolution, no metadata. See other copyvio files by this uploader. Harold (talk) 07:56, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:50, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
wrong file name. It is my error. Unuseful redirect Tangopaso (talk) 08:02, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:52, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Also to delete:
- File:Harry Mitchell.jpg
- File:Harry Mitchell 2nd June 2019.jpg
- File:HarryMitchellMusic-Vintage2020.jpg
- File:Dead Inside 100 Thousand Streams.jpg
self promotional content only used on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_Mitchell_(musician) which is already tagged with a deletion request --Hangman'sDeath (talk) 08:47, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 12:53, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Also delete:
- File:Thors Helmet.jpg
- File:Oneness Oil Painting.jpg
image uploaded for the sole purpose of self promotion --Hangman'sDeath (talk) 09:39, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 12:54, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo taken by J.O.S.O. Photo, not own work, but it's not the case. I have already stated that it is my tag for that camera, so it's not rationale to delete my own work. Therefore, I would like to appeal for this deletion request. --N509FZ Talk 前置,有座!Front engine with seats! 09:47, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete After searching on the Internet, I found some organization named "Joso Photo": JoSo Photography, Photo Joso. It is unclear that whether the image is belong to the uploader or the uploader is an employee of the above agency. Unless an OTRS permission can be obtained, photo may be deleted per COM:PRP. --A1Cafel (talk) 13:20, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose: But do you have the evidence that he or she lives in Beijing as well? That may be too ridiculous like this issue. After all, are you sure that this organization is in China? --N509FZ Talk 前置,有座!Front engine with seats! 15:41, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: I emailed for OTRS, and User:廣九直通車 made some additional statement to prove that I didn't violate any copyright. How can I violate my own copyright? --N509FZ Talk 前置,有座!Front engine with seats! 15:57, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: I further state it in Chinese: "J.O.S.O. Photos"其实也是本人相机中的EXIF署名,而本人用过的相机没有一台的署名是现在的维基账号,阁下更未能查证上述JoSo Photography的所在地是不是中国,是不是北京市,要知道世界上不同组织重名的情况并不少见,更何况人名。而且我之前已经因为“证明自己的照片是自己拍的”一事卷入过纠纷,很遗憾自己的其他网名对阁下造成了困扰,但是要知道一个人在不同的平台不一定会使用同一个用户名。本人用这台SX70 HS相机拍摄的照片均为本人拍摄。以上。--N509FZ Talk 前置,有座!Front engine with seats! 16:40, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep for all photos uploaded by N509FZ and tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio. With over 20K self taken photo uploads, N509FZ has never been caught for copyright violation since 2014. Therefore the threshold of COM:PRP should be higher than general users. The evidence given above can't prove the relation between FB accounts and aforesaid photos. Thus can't be a valid reason for deletion. --Baycrest (Talk) 17:31, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks. False accusations can easily ruin one's enthusiasm. --N509FZ Talk 前置,有座!Front engine with seats! 18:30, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:25, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo taken by J.O.S.O. Photo, not own work, but this is not the case, because it is my own alias. N509FZ Talk 前置,有座!Front engine with seats! 09:52, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:25, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo taken by J.O.S.O. Photo, not own work, but it is my own alias, so the copyvio is not the case. N509FZ Talk 前置,有座!Front engine with seats! 09:58, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:25, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo taken by J.O.S.O. Photo, not own work, but it is my own alias, so the copyvio is not the case. N509FZ Talk 前置,有座!Front engine with seats! 09:58, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:25, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo taken by J.O.S.O. Photo, not own work, but it is my own alias, so the copyvio is not the case. As the photographer, I would like to appeal for this deletion request. N509FZ Talk 前置,有座!Front engine with seats! 09:58, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:25, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo taken by J.O.S.O. Photo, not own work, but this is not the case. N509FZ Talk 前置,有座!Front engine with seats! 10:09, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:25, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo taken by J.O.S.O. Photo, not own work, but this is not the case. N509FZ Talk 前置,有座!Front engine with seats! 10:09, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:26, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo taken by J.O.S.O. Photo, not own work, but this is not the case. N509FZ Talk 前置,有座!Front engine with seats! 10:09, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:26, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo taken by J.O.S.O. Photo, not own work, but this is not the case. N509FZ Talk 前置,有座!Front engine with seats! 10:09, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:26, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo taken by J.O.S.O. Photo, not own work, but this is not the case. N509FZ Talk 前置,有座!Front engine with seats! 10:10, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:26, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo taken by J.O.S.O. Photo, not own work, but this is not the case. N509FZ Talk 前置,有座!Front engine with seats! 10:10, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:26, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo taken by J.O.S.O. Photo, not own work, but this is a wrong accusation. N509FZ Talk 前置,有座!Front engine with seats! 10:20, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:26, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo taken by J.O.S.O. Photo, not own work, but this is a wrong accusation. N509FZ Talk 前置,有座!Front engine with seats! 10:20, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:26, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo taken by J.O.S.O. Photo, not own work, but this is a wrong accusation. N509FZ Talk 前置,有座!Front engine with seats! 10:21, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:26, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo taken by J.O.S.O. Photo, not own work, but this is a wrong accusation. N509FZ Talk 前置,有座!Front engine with seats! 10:21, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:26, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo taken by J.O.S.O. Photo, not own work, but this is a wrong accusation. N509FZ Talk 前置,有座!Front engine with seats! 10:21, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:27, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo taken by J.O.S.O. Photo, not own work, but this is a wrong accusation. N509FZ Talk 前置,有座!Front engine with seats! 10:21, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:27, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo taken by J.O.S.O. Photo, not own work, but this is a wrong accusation. N509FZ Talk 前置,有座!Front engine with seats! 10:22, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:27, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo taken by J.O.S.O. Photo, not own work, but this is a wrong accusation. N509FZ Talk 前置,有座!Front engine with seats! 10:22, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- The user is doing the same with my picture and I just rollbacked him. --Wilfredor (talk) 04:10, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:27, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo taken by J.O.S.O. Photo, not own work, but this is a wrong accusation. N509FZ Talk 前置,有座!Front engine with seats! 10:22, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:27, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo taken by J.O.S.O. Photo, not own work, but this is a wrong accusation. N509FZ Talk 前置,有座!Front engine with seats! 10:24, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:28, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo taken by J.O.S.O. Photo, not own work, but this is a wrong accusation. N509FZ Talk 前置,有座!Front engine with seats! 10:25, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:28, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo taken by J.O.S.O. Photo, not own work, but this is a wrong accusation. N509FZ Talk 前置,有座!Front engine with seats! 10:25, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:28, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo taken by J.O.S.O. Photo, not own work, but this is a wrong accusation. N509FZ Talk 前置,有座!Front engine with seats! 10:25, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:28, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo taken by J.O.S.O. Photo, not own work, but this is a wrong accusation. N509FZ Talk 前置,有座!Front engine with seats! 10:25, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:28, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo taken by J.O.S.O. Photo, not own work, but this is a wrong accusation. N509FZ Talk 前置,有座!Front engine with seats! 10:31, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:28, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo taken by J.O.S.O. Photo, not own work, but this is a wrong accusation. N509FZ Talk 前置,有座!Front engine with seats! 10:31, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:28, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo taken by J.O.S.O. Photo, not own work, but this is a wrong accusation. N509FZ Talk 前置,有座!Front engine with seats! 10:31, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:28, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo taken by J.O.S.O. Photo, not own work, but this is a wrong accusation. N509FZ Talk 前置,有座!Front engine with seats! 10:32, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:28, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo taken by J.O.S.O. Photo, not own work, but this is a wrong accusation. N509FZ Talk 前置,有座!Front engine with seats! 10:37, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:28, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo taken by J.O.S.O. Photo, not own work, but this is a wrong accusation. N509FZ Talk 前置,有座!Front engine with seats! 10:37, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:28, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo taken by J.O.S.O. Photo, not own work, but this is a wrong accusation. N509FZ Talk 前置,有座!Front engine with seats! 10:37, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:29, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo taken by J.O.S.O. Photo, not own work, but this is a wrong accusation. N509FZ Talk 前置,有座!Front engine with seats! 10:38, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:29, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo taken by J.O.S.O. Photo, not own work, but this is a wrong accusation. N509FZ Talk 前置,有座!Front engine with seats! 10:38, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:29, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Not own work, nor does this seem to be in the public domain. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 00:25, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. JGHowes talk 00:46, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
No indication of CC licence on source page, probably copyrighted Ajmint (talk) 00:37, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - in the absence of an acceptable license, we must assume it is copyrighted.—ukexpat (talk) 22:14, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. JGHowes talk 01:01, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
This is claimed to be own work but this looks to be a publicity photo, The Hamilton Spectator uses a version of the image in this article with a credit of Toronto Star File Photo/Publicity Handout. Dinah Christie, one of the subjects in this photo has a copy of the photo on her Facebook page with an autograph lending weight to this being a publicity photo. Claim of own work is rather dubious and would need confirmation via COM:OTRS. Whpq (talk) 00:56, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. JGHowes talk 01:02, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
I believe that this image was originally uploaded by the photographer here: [3]. Its metadata states "(C) MEREDITH ADELAIDE". The uploader claims the image is their own work, but I doubt this. Ajmint (talk) 00:56, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. JGHowes talk 01:02, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
I believe that this image was originally uploaded here: [4]. This page states that the photographer is Ebb Bayarsaikhan. The uploader claims the image is their own work, but I doubt this. Ajmint (talk) 00:59, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. JGHowes talk 01:02, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
I believe that this image was originally uploaded here: [5]. This page states that the photographer is Ebb Bayarsaikhan. The uploader claims the image is their own work, but I doubt this. Ajmint (talk) 00:59, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. JGHowes talk 01:03, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Created by mistake. Belongs to a different person with no official status. Kj1595 (talk) 03:23, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. JGHowes talk 01:24, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Daiwenchen (talk · contribs)
editPhotos were previously published without a free license [6]. Uploader needs to send a free license to COM:OTRS.
- File:Porch of the south gate of Beijing university in the aftermath of the 1989 June 4th incident in Bejing, 4.jpg
- File:Porch of the south gate of Beijing university in the aftermath of the 1989 June 4th incident in Bejing, 3.jpg
- File:Porch of the south gate of Beijing university in the aftermath of the 1989 June 4th incident in Bejing , 2.jpg
- File:Porch of the south gate of Beijing university in the aftermath of the 1989 June 4th incident in Bejing.jpg
- File:Posters on Zhongguan cun street, Haidian, in the aftermath of the 1989 June 4th incident in Bejing, 3.jpg
- File:Posters on Zhongguan cun street, Haidian, in the aftermath of the 1989 June 4th incident in Bejing, 2.jpg
- File:Posters on Zhongguan cun street, Haidian, in the aftermath of the 1989 June 4th incident in Bejing.jpg
- File:Beijing june 1989 East gate of People's University 人民大学东门.jpg
- File:Beijing june 1989 Zhongguancun street.jpg
Wcam (talk) 11:42, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. FFS, I encouraged this user to upload his historically important photos of Beijing from June 1989 to Commons, and he did so under a CC-BY-SA-4.0 license, and then you nominate them all for deletion -- guaranteed to turn a new user away from Wikimedia. The fact that he posted low resolution versions of these images on twitter previously is totally irrelevant, as he has now uploaded the original high resolution scanned images to Commons under an appropriate CC license. There is no reason why he would need to send a free license to OTRS when he has already used a free license on the uploads to Commons! (I myself often post photos to twitter before uploading to Commons, and I am sure many other users do too.) BabelStone (talk) 18:44, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- I confirm that I am the author of those pictures, and was advised by BabelStone to upload it on wikimedia commons precisely after I've sent a selection of it on my twitter account (who's the same name as the wikimedia account I've created. I would like to upload more picture but won't do it if it's getting too complicated (I'm a beginner on wikimedia!) I do not have the slightest idea about what COM OTRS is, to begin with!) Thanks BabelStone for his support. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daiwenchen (talk • contribs) 09:07, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- I personally would very much like to see these images kept, but per Commons rules (Commons:OTRS#Licensing_images:_when_do_I_contact_OTRS?) images that have been previously published without a free license need OTRS verification. It is unclear to me that prior publication being in low resolution would make the situation ok. I will start a section on Commons:Help desk to get some clarification, but to avoid uncertainties it is best that @Daiwenchen send an email following the instructions on COM:OTRS/CONSENT, which I expect would fully resolve the issue. --Wcam (talk) 13:22, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep I agree with @BabelStone; this is ridiculous. If a low resolution version has been published previously; that essentially means that it has been partially published. Requiring verification for partially published material seems to go against the spirit, if not the letter, of the policy. But even if verification is required, it should be done through the Twitter account. Just get @Daiwenchen to post “I am Daiwenchen on Wikimedia Commons” (or something to that effect) using the same account as when they posted the low resolution versions (I saw this idea proposed at Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive#File:PrototypeSpacetrain.jpg by an admin). Brianjd (talk) 13:41, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Daiwenchen: Actually, can you go ahead and put that post on Twitter anyway? You have nothing to lose. You can always delete the post after trusted users here have verified it. Brianjd (talk) 13:45, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- Daiwenchen has already implicitly confirmed that he uploaded the images with this tweet -- which should be good enough in my opinion. BabelStone (talk) 17:21, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- Indeed, that twitter thread makes it rather obvious. -- Asclepias (talk) 18:58, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- I'm going to wait a while the verdict of the users community, and, if my pictures aren't deleted, I'll upload the remaining ones.If they are, I will turn to another way to give access to the public to it, as a university repository. But I feel that this redtape is a little bit absurd: I did publish those pictures on my twitter account, then released a few of them on a similarly named (@Daiwenchen) wikimedia commons account, I do not see the point in asking me that I have the rights on those pictures again and again. Sorry Wcam, but aren't you a bit "more catholic than the pope"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daiwenchen (talk • contribs) 14:03, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- Verification by a tweet works. I will withdraw my deletion request after such a tweet is posted. @Daiwenchen: I understand this may seem unreasonable to you but here on Commons we constantly get false claims of copyrights, as anyone can grab images from Twitter and upload them here claiming they created the images. Therefore previously published images require additional evidence of permission. --Wcam (talk) 14:37, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- Yet the images Daiwenchen uploaded to Commons are much higher resolution than the images posted on twitter (Twitter: 1,199 × 759 pixels; Commons: 5,099 × 3,227 pixels), so it is common sense that this cannot be a fake Daiwenchen who has grabbed the images without permission from twitter. You are putting needless barriers to new users. BabelStone (talk) 17:19, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- @ Daiwenchen : C'est une bonne chose de toutes façons d'en rendre des copies disponibles à plusieurs endroits. -- Asclepias (talk) 18:58, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Can you tell me what text should I put on the tweet? I'll do it. @Daiwenchen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daiwenchen (talk • contribs) 14:41, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- Literally, “I am Daiwenchen on Wikimedia Commons”. Then link the tweet here. - Jmabel ! talk 14:58, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Higher resolution on Commons. Nobody even suggested any actual reason to doubt. No verification required. -- Asclepias (talk) 18:58, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination per [7]. --Wcam (talk) 20:17, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Here is the tweet i've sent: https://twitter.com/Daiwenchen/status/1275699523734646784 @Daiwenchen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daiwenchen (talk • contribs) 08:08, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. JGHowes talk 01:36, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Basquyati as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Unnecessary information. But in my opinion the info is useful. Uploader's request is valid reason only during first week after upload; here more than month has passed. Taivo (talk) 11:47, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep due to invalid reason for deletion. I think this diagram could be useful for some future projects. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 08:31, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. JGHowes talk 01:39, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
fixed original to include EL, this is broken not needed anymore, I think. see File:Bundesrat Sitzverteilung.svg Aeroid (talk) 08:58, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, replaced by File:Bundesrat Sitzverteilung.svg, unused. --Wdwd (talk) 10:03, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGING, the design on the box is complex and copyrighted. SCP-2000 10:09, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:04, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Propbably from https://www.facebook.com/robertficosk/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:26, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- It's just your guess and it doesn't mean anything. The truth is that it is my work, a photo from a press conference. Completely unnecessary nomination based only on presumption without any proof. --Jurajec12 (talk) 13:01, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Commons policy says that it’s the uploader’s job to show they have the rights, especially if the file has been published elsewhere before Commons. Brianjd (talk) 13:23, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Pinging @Jurajec12. Brianjd (talk) 13:24, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- How do you imagine I can prove it? How would you do it? You simply have no evidence or reason for this request.
- --Jurajec12 (talk) 13:31, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Jurajec12: You simply have no evidence or reason for this request. I don’t have time to respond to comments like this. Maybe @Patrick Rogel does, or maybe we should just delete this. Brianjd (talk) 13:42, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- This fact is not fair. I'm sad about that. I want to have current content here and you simply select a photo and want to delete it. At the same time, you have no evidence or reason for this. How should Wikipedia be free then? --Jurajec12 (talk) 14:08, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Jurajec12: You simply have no evidence or reason for this request. I don’t have time to respond to comments like this. Maybe @Patrick Rogel does, or maybe we should just delete this. Brianjd (talk) 13:42, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Pinging @Jurajec12. Brianjd (talk) 13:24, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Commons policy says that it’s the uploader’s job to show they have the rights, especially if the file has been published elsewhere before Commons. Brianjd (talk) 13:23, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 10:09, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yesaya David Liem as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G7. Uploader's request is valid reason for deletion only during first week after upload. Here more than month has passed. Taivo (talk) 11:38, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Don’t see anything private. File is in use. Brianjd (talk) 13:25, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 10:07, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
duplicate of File:Redd in red.jpg Teemeah (talk) 12:36, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:10, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Very low quality photo. Solomon203 (talk) 13:37, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 10:54, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
This image is not sharp and of low resolution. Unfortunately, there many better images of this species in Commons now. Would recomment deletion. GRDN711 (talk) 13:48, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep it isn't brilliant, but it is OK - MPF (talk) 00:29, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 10:54, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
copyright ? had pretty bad knowledge of french laws. Tehkni (talk) 13:32, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 18:26, 3 Juli 2020 UTC: Copyright violation: building too recent --Krdbot 02:19, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
copyright ? had pretty bad knowledge of french laws. Tehkni (talk) 13:33, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 07:42, 3 Juli 2020 UTC: Copyright violation: building too recent --Krdbot 02:19, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
copyright ? had pretty bad knowledge of french laws. Tehkni (talk) 13:33, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 07:43, 3 Juli 2020 UTC: Copyright violation: building too recent --Krdbot 02:19, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
copyright ? had pretty bad knowledge of french laws. Tehkni (talk) 13:33, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 07:42, 3 Juli 2020 UTC: Copyright violation: building too recent --Krdbot 02:19, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Mother India (1957)
editThese files all come from the 1957 Indian movie Mother India. Category link: Category:Mother India (1957)
- File:Jillo Bai.jpg
- File:Kanhaiyalal in Mother India.jpg
- File:Mother India poster.jpg
- File:Mother India, 1957.webm
- File:Raaj Kumar in Mother India.jpg
(File:Mother India by Satyanarayana.jpg is being handled here as something completely different, but lacking a source regardless.)
I hate to be that guy and create a DR for media of the day files uploaded by an administrator, but I have determined that the five files listed above, while definitely in the public domain under Indian law, are copyrighted in the United States under the URAA.
- The work was created and initially published in India on October 25, 1957 and was not published in the United States until July 9, 1959, well past the 30-day threshold for being treated as a US work.
- Looking at the video as uploaded here, the top and bottom of the film have been cropped off, so I wondered if maybe there was a notice on the uncropped version. YouTube had another version of the film that was uploaded without the cropping, and alas, no copyright notice was to be found.
- Indian copyright law protects films for 60 years after publication; therefore, the Indian copyright expired at the end of 2017. However, because the Indian copyright was still valid on January 1, 1996, the United States gave its copyright back at that time. The United States does not seem to implement the rule of the shorter term, and as such, the U.S. copyright will not expire until 2053 under current law.
I apologize for having to lose these files when they are very much in use, and I agree that the U.S. should implement the rule of the shorter term, but I feel the precautionary principle and U.S. law necessitate such removals. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 01:34, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep URAA can't be the sole reason for deleting files. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:24, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete According to COM:Licensing, we cannot keep images if they are not free in the US. Buidhe (talk) 22:24, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Regrettably, it seems to be the case that this film's copyright was restored in the U.S. by URAA, and therefore these screenshots can't remain on Commons, but certainly can be kept on the Indian Wikipedia as PD in India but not the U.S. — JGHowes talk 01:21, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, will be undeleted in 2053. Taivo (talk) 17:45, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Nanzoin, Sasaguri
editNo FoP in Japan for artistic works. The big Buddha statue was created in 1995. [8], [9]
- File:Buddha statue in Nanzoin.jpg
- File:Reclining Buddha in Nanzoin Temple 20150429-2.JPG
- File:Reclining Buddha in Nanzoin Temple 20150429.JPG
- File:Reclining Buddha statues of Nanzoin.jpg
- File:南蔵院 釈迦涅槃像 (4864788026).jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:34, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:12, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Nanzoin, Sasaguri
editThe statue of Sakimori was erected in 2012. (It is written on the description board in File:Sakimori 1.jpg. 平成二十四年 = 2012) No FoP in Japan for artistic works.
- File:Sakimori 1.jpg
- File:Sakimori 2.jpg
- File:Statue of Soldiers in Nanzoin Temple in Sasaguri, Kasuya, Fukuoka.JPG
Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:10, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: work by living hakata doll craftsman Nobutaka Nakamura. --Yasu (talk) 15:42, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
And also other files from category:
- File:Music and Drama Theater, Rivne (5).jpg
- File:1. Музично-драматичний театр; Рівне.JPG
- File:2. Музично-драматичний театр; Рівне.JPG
- File:3. Музично-драматичний театр; Рівне.JPG
- File:4. Музично-драматичний театр; Рівне.JPG
- File:Music and Drama Theater, Rivne (1).jpg
- File:Music and Drama Theater, Rivne (2).jpg
- File:Music and Drama Theater, Rivne (3).jpg
- File:Music and Drama Theater, Rivne (4).jpg
- File:Music and Drama Theater, Rivne (5).jpg
- File:Music and Drama Theater, Rivne (6).jpg
- File:Music and Drama Theater, Rivne (7).jpg
- File:Rivne, Rivnens'ka oblast, Ukraine - panoramio (84).jpg
- File:Rivne6.JPG
- File:Драмтеатр в Ровно.jpg
- File:Драмтеатр ввечері - panoramio.jpg
- File:Музично-драматичний театр (мур.) 2.JPG
- File:Музично-драматичний театр (мур.).JPG
- File:Музично-драматичний театр м. Рівне 1.JPG
- File:Музично-драматичний театр м. Рівне 2.JPG
- File:Музично-драматичний театр м.Рівне.jpg
- File:Музично-драматичний театр Рівне 1.jpg
- File:Музично-драматичний театр. м.Рівне..jpg
- File:Музично-драматичний театр. м.Рівне.jpg
- File:Рівне - Музично-драматичний театр DSC 6139.JPG
- File:Рівне, Театральна площа 1, Музично-драматичний театр.jpg
- File:Рівне.Музично-драматичний театр.jpg
- File:Рівненський Музично-драматичний театр DSC 5897.JPG
- File:Рівненський обласний академічний український музично-драматичний театр P1570524.jpg
- File:Рівненський обласний академічний український музично-драматичний театр, Рівне, Театральна площа, 1.jpg
- File:Рівненський обласний академічний український музично-драматичний театр.jpg
- File:Рівненський обласний український музично-драматичний театр.JPG
- File:Ровно Драматический театр.jpg
- File:Ровно Театр.jpg
- File:Ровно. Музыкально-драматический театр..JPG
- File:Скульптурна композиція на рівненському театрі DSCF3823.JPG
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created after 1960. No Permission from the sculptor / architect. Микола Василечко (talk) 05:46, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Music and Drama Theater in Rivne was found in 1939, not after 1960. What name of sculptors' and architects' whos' copyright was violated? --Venzz (talk) 05:54, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Music and Drama Theater in Rivne was found in 1939, but the building was built in the 1960s. --Микола Василечко (talk) 06:23, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:32, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
-Restored: per COM:UR. There is permission from Borys Zhezherin.--Anatoliy 🇺🇦 (talk) 22:31, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
And also
- File:Music and Drama Theater, Rivne (5).jpg
- File:Скульптурна композиція на рівненському театрі DSCF3823.JPG
There is permission from Borys Zhezherin. Borys Zhezherin is architect, not sculptor. There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created in 1960s. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 16:44, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- Так а хто там скульптор?--Anatoliy 🇺🇦 (talk) 17:09, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- А не знаю, але точно не Жежерін. А що знаю — архітектор не може давати дозвіл за скульптора, якщо скульптури є окремою композицією. --Микола Василечко (talk) 17:28, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- Keep According to the Ukrainian copyright law (article 13) what matters is whether the work is inseparable (нерозривне ціле). Here it clearly is, this sculptural decoration is a part of the building, was designed for this building, and is not removable. As a result, it forms a single inseparable work (in copyright terms) with the object. The default in Ukrainian copyright law is that any co-author is allowed to provide permission for the entire work. I don't see any evidence of either an agreement between co-authors that prevent Borys Zhezherin from giving permission on sculptural decorations, or an evidence that other heirs have documented opposition to such permission, or that sculptural decorations can be used separately from the theatre building (може використовуватися незалежно від інших частин твору). As a result, the default applies and Zhezherin's permission is valid for the entire building — Nick UA (talk) 18:47, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —holly {chat} 22:23, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
C.D. Concepción kits
editThese association football kits incorporate elements of non-free logos; they are inappropriate derivative works.
- File:Kit body concepcion02a.svg
- File:Kit body concepcion02h.svg
- File:Kit body concepcion03h.svg
- File:Kit body concepcion04h.svg
- File:Kit body concepcion96a.svg
- File:Kit body concepcion97a.svg
- File:Kit body concepcion98a.svg
- File:Kit body concepcion98h.svg
- File:Kit body concepcion99a.svg
- File:Kit body concepcion99h.svg
- File:Kit right arm concepcion97a.svg
- File:Kit shorts concepcion96a.svg
— ξxplicit 23:58, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
- Edited!! without logos now — Preceding unsigned comment added by Delafuente79 (talk • contribs) 03:06, 17 December 2016 (UTC) (UTC) (UTC)
- The previous revisions should still be deleted per my nomination statement. — ξxplicit 00:07, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: I have deleted copyvio historic versions. However, @Delafuente79: , please also fix the File:Kit body concepcion96a.svg which has been missed out. We can then close this FfD. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:07, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: as per above. --Yann (talk) 16:14, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Association football
editLogos of varying levels of sophistication with dubious claims of free license.
- File:1--fc-schweinfurt-05-vector-logo.png
- File:1. FC Lok Leipzig.png
- File:13 de junio escudo original.png
- File:968 acs dumitra (1).jpg
- File:Acri calcio 2017 internet.jpg
- File:Alchaster Football Club.png
- File:Anji-unior logo.tif
- File:ArmanPavlodar.png
- File:ASD NUOVASQUINZANO.jpg
- File:Atletico de Cali 2017.png
- File:Atlético fc.png
- File:Barranquilla Futbol Club.png
- File:Blackeagle.png
- File:Boavista Crest (1903-1933).jpg
- File:BuryAFCbadge.jpg
- File:C.C.D. Los Caimanes.png
- File:Chelsea Headhunters.jpg
- File:Delfin Ecuador.png
- File:Depor FC Cali.png
- File:Deportivo Cali.jpg
- File:Escudo Hogar.jpg
- File:Escudo Real Pilar.jpg
- File:Fédération Haïtienne de Football (logo).png
- File:Gavilan123.gif
- File:Gavilanes.jpg
- File:GBrownPM.png
- File:Herb Burton Albion.png
- File:HerreroBrigantina.png
- File:HuracanCR.png
- File:ImminghamTownFC.png
- File:INSIGNIA.jpg
- File:LigaTucumanaDeFutbol.jpg
- File:Logocentralcordoba.png
- File:MDF2016.png
- File:Mdlogoofficial.png
- File:MIASOCCER LOGO.png
- File:Moreno Valley FC.png
- File:North Caledonian FA.jpg
- File:Nuova squinzano calcio.jpg
- File:Paisaje.gif
- File:Real Club Recreativo de Huelva.png
- File:RealUnión1929-1946.png
- File:Realunión194748.png
- File:Realunión194849.png
- File:RealUnión7090.png
- File:Realunión9003.png
- File:RealUniónactual.png
- File:Sacachispas2.png
- File:SAFG.png
- File:Santa Tecla FC 2017.png
- File:Santander unidentified.png
- File:Saudi Arabian.png
- File:SC Motor Karl-Marx-Stadt.jpg
- File:Screenshot 20170413-174915 1.jpg
- File:SDEibar escudo 2017.png
- File:Sfc-opava-logo.gif
- File:Sigla Stiinta Miroslava.png
- File:Sockers Logo 2017.png
- File:SportingClubChababMohammedia.png
- File:Squinzano 1928.jpg
- File:Steaua logo.jpg
- File:Taller peque.png
- File:TauroFC2017.png
- File:Thika United FC logo-white.fw.png
- File:Thika United FC.logo-blue.jpg
- File:Tlaxcala Fútbol Club - Escudo 2017.png
- File:Tlaxcala Fútbol Club.png
- File:Torneo Apertura 2017 VEN.png
- File:TSG Heppenheim Fussball.jpg
- File:UD Aguila.jpg
- File:UP Viso.jpg
- File:Ол.png
- File:ФК Колос. Великий Полюхів.jpg
- File:Черноморец Одесса.png
- File:Эмблема ФК Интернационал.png
- File:ਫੁੱਟਬਾਲ ਲੀਗ.jpg
Ytoyoda (talk) 13:11, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete All above the TOO, copyrighted. Fma12 (talk) 22:12, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:53, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Association football
editRedundant to images already listed at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Aek19668285
Ytoyoda (talk) 14:35, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:54, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Association football
editMetadata credits FELIPE OLIVEIRA, relationship to uploader not explained.
- File:CAMPEONATO BRASILEIRO.jpg
- File:CAMPEONATO BRASILEIRO DE 1959.jpg
- File:CAMPEONATO BRASILEIRO (BAHIA).jpg
Ytoyoda (talk) 17:33, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:47, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Datei ist fast identisch mit File:Wuppertal, Schwerinstr. 5 Zietenstr. 9, Bild 3.jpg. Diese Datei wurde von mir damals im Zusammenhang mit Bildern der Zietenstraße hochgeladen, was ich vergessen hatte Im Fokus (talk) 23:05, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 08:09, 18 Juli 2020 UTC: Datei ist fast identisch mit File:Wuppertal, Schwerinstr. 5 Zietenstr. 9, Bild 3.jpg. Diese Datei wurde von mir damals im Zusammenhang mit Bildern der Zietenstraße hochgeladen, was ich vergessen hatte --Krdbot 20:07, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Datei ist fast identisch mit File:Wuppertal, Schwerinstr. 5 Zietenstr. 9, Bild 2.jpg. Diese Datei wurde von mir damals im Zusammenhang mit Bildern der Zietenstraße hochgeladen, was ich vergessen hatte Im Fokus (talk) 23:13, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 08:09, 18 Juli 2020 UTC: Datei ist fast identisch mit File:Wuppertal, Schwerinstr. 5 Zietenstr. 9, Bild 2.jpg. Diese Datei wurde von mir damals im Zusammenhang mit Bildern der Zietenstraße hochgeladen, was ich vergessen hatte --Krdbot 20:07, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Not own work. Not old enough. Not simple enough, probably not de minimis. Strakhov (talk) 23:25, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:15, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
COM:LL - reupload of documentary with bogus CC license. For example, appeared here (and elsewhere) prior to vimeo "source" upload. Эlcobbola talk 23:35, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:14, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
COM:LL - reupload of documentary with bogus CC license. For example, appeared here (and elsewhere) prior to vimeo "source" upload.
Эlcobbola talk 23:37, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Elcobbola: Surely if the director Scott Perry put this director's cut (notice the difference in lengths) of the documentary on Vimeo under a CC-BY license, its allowed to be used? Almost all of his other files on the commons that are from Vimeo have appeared on elsewere prior to the Vimeo upload. What's the issue here? heyitsben!! talk 08:20, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- This issue here is as stated. 1) Alternative edits, like director's cuts, are generally COM:DWs of the "original work"; 2) directors are not necessarily (and are typically seldomly) the copyright holders of audiovisual works (e.g., surely you don't believe Steven Spielberg owns the copyright to Jaws); and 3) other Commons images sourced to Vimeo are w:WP:OTHERSTUFF and not relevant here. If you're aware of other license laundering violations, feel free to nominate them for deletion. Эlcobbola talk 16:30, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:14, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
Not own work. Illustrator (if not anonymous) needed. Publishing date needed too. Book's author (José Revueltas) died in 1976, but he probably did not design the cover. So: Additional input required to assign proper license. Strakhov (talk) 23:42, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:11, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Fair use (Fair use) but it seems to be PD-ineligible instead. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 00:31, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep as {{PD-textlogo}}. — JGHowes talk 00:58, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: PD-ineligible. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:28, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
out of scope Quakewoody (talk) 03:37, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Question Used in Wikidata in Q25489037 - but I'm not really sure that this qualifies as COM:INUSE in this case, as I'm not sure that the Wikidata entry really meets the criteria of Wikidata:Notability (maybe no. 2?); on the other hand, that would be for the Wikidata community to decide. Gestumblindi (talk) 23:33, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
- WD does qualify as being 'in use', but the WD item is currently nominated for deletion. In fact, it has been on the list for quite a long time, but there is currently a large backlog. Quakewoody (talk) 01:21, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Quakewoody: Ah, that's not obvious. Didn't know that deletion requests on Wikidata don't show up on the item itself, so I didn't see that. Gestumblindi (talk) 09:54, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
- Yeah, WD doesn't really hold discussions the way other projects do. NfD is more of a notification for admin to look and decide. But there are two ways to know. First, the links on the left "what links here" will tell you. And the other way is in your preferences under gadget, you can have a little notification box appear when you open an item. Quakewoody (talk) 13:33, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Quakewoody: Ah, that's not obvious. Didn't know that deletion requests on Wikidata don't show up on the item itself, so I didn't see that. Gestumblindi (talk) 09:54, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
- WD does qualify as being 'in use', but the WD item is currently nominated for deletion. In fact, it has been on the list for quite a long time, but there is currently a large backlog. Quakewoody (talk) 01:21, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Bencemac (talk) 17:45, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Out of scope: private photo of a non-notable person. Jackmcbarn (talk) 04:27, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:29, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
Complex logo exceeding China's TOO. Wcam (talk) 12:31, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:30, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
low quality image of Category:Mary Magdalene? Unused, uncategorised, no location given. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 16:05, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:20, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
out of scope Quakewoody (talk) 03:40, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:40, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Book Cover - This is not own work Luckie Luke (talk) 15:33, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 19:23, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Book Cover - This is not own work Luckie Luke (talk) 15:34, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 19:25, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Book Cover - This is not own work Luckie Luke (talk) 15:34, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 19:26, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Book Cover - This is not own work Luckie Luke (talk) 15:35, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 19:26, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
No higher resolution than 250 × 167. Is this picture really usable? BarnCas (talk) 06:19, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 06:18, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
No higher resolution than 250 × 167. Is this picture really usable? BarnCas (talk) 06:20, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 06:18, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
There is no source. It is used everywhere but what is the real context? Beshogur (talk) 17:04, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Oppose this picture is used exactly on correct articles not everywhere. This picture are used in those articles which are related to Anti-Armenian sentiment and according to this picture permission and license, there are no obligations for using it. I oppose with deletion Luckie Luke (talk) 04:54, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- Comment:: I'm not trying to censor something. I want to see the source, since there isn't, I'm nominating it. Beshogur (talk) 07:58, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- This file's license has been verified by COM:OTRS. If you want an OTRS volunteer to clarify its licensing or source, then you may ask about it at COM:OTRSN. Files are generally only deleted from Commons when their copyright status is considered too questionable for Commons purposes (as explained in COM:PCP); files aren't usually deleted because of the way they are being used in certain articles. That's more of a content dispute and is something which should be resolved locally on whichever Wikipedia project's articles the file is being used in. -- Marchjuly (talk) 03:01, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
Comment FWIW, this image is not mentioned in the OTRS ticket shown and the original uploader User:Artaxiad is a banned sockpuppeteer of many accounts. Ww2censor (talk) 12:52, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per comment by User:Ww2censor above. FredWalsh (talk) 17:23, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note, I believe that this image, a reduced resolution still extracted from video material, was released into the public domain by its taker, an Iranian Armenian priest. I will try and contact someone who may know more about this.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.3.123.210 (talk • contribs) 15:42, August 10, 2020 (UTC) (UTC)
Deleted: per ww2censor. --Gbawden (talk) 15:11, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Historical photos and drawing. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- I added a source for File:Provence - Dell Antella 1602 selection.jpg since I recognised the map it was extracted from. File:Lithographic print.jpg should be public domain since it dates back to the 19th century. I couldn't find a source for File:Gran Salon.jpg, perhaps AndSeg005 (talk · contribs) can add something regarding this? --Xwejnusgozo (talk) 09:36, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
- I fixed the copyright tags (PD-old-100-1923); I am looking for further sources for the Gran Salon and Auberge de Provence pics. Meanwhile, I think we can remove the deletion tag. What would you say, @EugeneZelenko: ? Many thanks! --Dans (talk) 17:53, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: license/source were fixed. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:51, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
this is not own work Luckie Luke (talk) 15:52, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: It trully doesn't look like own work. Likely copyvio. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:30, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
useless and no usage Hoseina051311 (talk) 15:01, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: It trully doesn't look like own work. Likely copyvio. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:30, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
this is not own work - (A picture of International Court of Justice in The Hague, Netherlands) Luckie Luke (talk) 15:42, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 05:09, 29 Oktober 2020 UTC: No permission since 21 October 2020 --Krdbot 08:02, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
Logo of a football club, no simple geometric shapes. KeepingWikiClean (talk) 15:22, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep The logo is including the insignia of Wülflingen, which is an official work, the rest are simple shapes. Fundriver (talk) 23:57, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- Info: This file was initially tagged by Glorious 93 as Copyvio (copyvio), another deletion request with the rationale „NOT a simple logo. Still under copyrights by its rightful owner.“ was merged into this one. Fundriver (talk) 19:19, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Per fundriver. --Gbawden (talk) 09:41, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
Logo of a football club, no simple geometric shapes. KeepingWikiClean (talk) 15:22, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep The logo is including the insignia of Wülflingen, which is an official work, the rest are simple shapes. Fundriver (talk) 23:57, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- Info: This file was initially tagged by Glorious 93 as Copyvio (copyvio), another deletion request with the rationale „NOT a simple logo. Still under copyrights by its rightful owner.“ was merged into this one. Fundriver (talk) 19:19, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:42, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
Duplicado exacto del archivo BAP Lima.jpg Zerrano (talk) 01:33, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 00:13, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
Por violación de derechos de autor ya que Genio540 no es el verdadero autor de dicho trabajo Zerrano (talk) 16:51, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 00:13, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Glorious 93 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: NOT a simple logo. Still under copyrights by its rightful owner. Pierpao.lo (listening) 19:12, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 04:49, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hhh26A8A7E9-7AF2-44EE-9993-9BE0C10951B8.jpg. Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:42, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Deleted Unknown author and hence unclear copyright status. Same painting as File:Hhh26A8A7E9-7AF2-44EE-9993-9BE0C10951B8.jpg where a different user claims copyright. Thuresson (talk) 22:39, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
low quality and no use FleurDeOdile (talk) 21:14, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 02:31, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Lower quality and resolution version of already pre-existing File:KRC Genk Logo 2016.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 21:28, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 02:31, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Je ne possède pas les droits pour cette photo LeZèbre (talk) 22:55, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 02:30, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
İt is not flag of siberian tatars — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.169.216.157 (talk) 12:47, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 02:35, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 02:34, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Prominent poster is a copyright issue, and usage on ja.wp is problematic due to use of 'negroid', whether it's a translation problem or not. Fæ (talk) 15:59, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 02:34, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. Nahid Hossain (talk) 18:06, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Not low resolution and not on Google. --A.Savin 02:33, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Fake logo for en:New World Order (professional wrestling) JTP (talk • contribs) 21:06, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 09:03, 28 April 2021 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by DraGoth --Krdbot 12:15, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
Transmission code appears to be a Facebook image, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 04:07, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 01:02, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Gogolplex as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://islamichumanities.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/minassian1.jpg, it belongs to Brown university and not his own work
Likely to be {{PD-Art}}, any copyright claims likely spurious. Storkk (talk) 08:25, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 01:02, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
copyright ? had pretty bad knowledge of french laws. Tehkni (talk) 13:32, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 01:03, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
copyright ? had pretty bad knowledge of french laws. Tehkni (talk) 13:32, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 01:03, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Wrong license Mahmoudalrawi (talk) 16:28, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Why on earth you want to delete a picture that already published on ar.wikipedia.com. if wrong license, you can simply correct it. Abdulaziz Alwafaee (talk) 15:42, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 01:04, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Blatant copy of the official coat of arms from the university website, which the edit history corroborates, with just some changes so bots won't pick it up, so no argument over fair use, and incorrect license. The lion is not simple geometric, and hence the issue. Whilst coats of arms are allowed on commons, particular renditions (emblazonments) are subject to copyright, see COM:COA. Alternative arms are also available (not that it's directly relevant) which are passable at least. Shadowssettle (talk) 16:48, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 01:04, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Fake logo for en:New World Order (professional wrestling) JTP (talk • contribs) 21:06, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 01:06, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
I'm nominating only the first version of this file (since the current one may pass COM:De minimis. Such thing doesn't happen with the old one IMHO). Strakhov (talk) 23:34, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination deletion of the 1st version. --A.Savin 01:07, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Footage said some part of the video are provided by Burang County TV, not China News A1Cafel (talk) 10:16, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: Per A1Cafel. --SCP-2000 10:41, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: Could be qualified as de minimis if used within a video, not individually. Taking screenshots of those segments provided by that local TV station may infringe copyright. --Techyan(Talk) 05:28, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Delete per PCP. ~riley (talk) 18:45, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
事務所の許可がない画像です。肖像権の侵害に値します。 Aimo0712 (talk) 06:23, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- This is not Japanese Wikipedia, this is Wikimedia Commons. This is a photo in public of a public figure. Stop harassing me because of the discussion on Japanese Wikipedia about another issue. Nesnad 13:44, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Google translates the given reason as suggesting that the image violates personality rights ("This is an image without permission from the office. Deserves infringement of portrait rights"). As Momoko Kikuchi indeed seems to be a public figure, and it seems to be a photo taken in a public place, I suppose that Nesnad is right and we can Keep this image, but maybe another admin is more familiar with personality rights in Japan. Gestumblindi (talk) 23:38, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep In general, Japan's requirements for consent are noteworthy albeit somewhat ill-defined and based on case law. The Japanese photographer's society guide says a photograph is allowable without consent as long as it's "a matter of interest within the society" (which would be the case with a public celebrity) and "not unjust". Absent an objection from Momoko Kikuchi in the two years the photo has been on Commons, the file should be kept (with the included {{Personality}} tag). — JGHowes talk 02:15, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:40, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
File:Jean-Pierre Granger, Portrait de Mélanie Malher, née Froment-Meurice, soeur du gendre du peintre, 1830, huile sur toile. Coll. particulière.jpg
editLe titre de cette oeuvre n'est pas correct. Philippe Comar (talk) 15:09, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: No valid reason. --Achim (talk) 15:41, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Philippe: → File:Jean-Pierre Granger, Portrait de Mélanie Malher, née Froment-Meurice, soeur du gendre du peintre, 1830, huile sur toile. Coll. particulière.jpg → Plus → Déplacer Achim (talk) 15:45, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Use {{Rename}} instead. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:47, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
File:The trunk of the Y chromosome haplogroup tree and illustrated people with the relevant haplogroups.jpg
editChecking the source of this image [10] there is no detail of where the portrait images came from. They are not the property of the paper's author and based on searching for other uses seem to be from a clip art library that has not been declared. Fails COM:PRP as the release of the works this composite image has been created from cannot be verified. Fæ (talk) 16:19, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Support From the fact that authors are anthropologists, I thought these various peoples photos are come from their own stocks, when I've uploaded. But as Fæ says, it's not declared in the paper. And when I looking images closely, the multiple images seems to me doesn't share the same style or format between each photos. Adding Fæ's case, I found Andamanese girl photo is selling here[11] (This doesn't directly mean this shop owns legitimate copyright. There are many image shops which SELLs free open license photos). Anyway, it is unclear where the human photo part of this image came from. So I think applying COM:PRP is reasonable. --Was a bee (talk) 17:55, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- I removed the weird category Category:Scientific racism deletion requests from this page. Please... --Was a bee (talk) 18:02, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- I have re-added the category. The idea that people who are defined by the nationalities "French" and "Chinese" have a particular genetic marker that could be used to test it, is fundamental scientific racism. The line-up of portraits by skin colour "Brown, White, Yellow", is breathtakingly obvious scientific racism and the tracking category is entirely warranted. --Fæ (talk) 11:04, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:49, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by LifetimeWiki as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://drsudhirhegde.in/about-dr-sudhir-hegde/
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as linked external photo is not the same. However, the image might be out-of-scope, depending on the discussion at the project where it is currently in use. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:36, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: not found elsewhere using Google Images. In use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:51, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by McVahl as Logo (above threshold of originality|source=The seal was created in 1983 per University's official website and does not qualify for public domain license.)
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. However, immediate source for this image is a fair-use-labelled image at :en[12]. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:46, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- seems to be creation of 1983 (at least this was the year where the "logo" was used first). It contains some components of the old COA. Thanks for the URL. So on New Year's of 2084 it'll be PD-old. Could some admin do me the favor to just hide it until then? There is some "{{}} function" for a resurrection which I have forgotten. Best wishes to all --Mateus2019 (talk) 20:44, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:52, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/hastemplate:Geograph filemime:"image/png"
editThese are PNG files converted from the original (for our purposes) JPEG versions on Geograph. The JPEG versions are all now available on Commons. There's no reason to use the PNG versions when the JPEGs are available.
- File:Fairburn Estate access gate to the Orrin Reservoir road - geograph.org.uk - 5255396.png (JPEG version File:Fairburn Estate access gate to the Orrin Reservoir road (geograph 5255396).jpg)
- File:Inch House man trap - geograph.org.uk - 2289659.png (JPEG version File:Inch House man trap (geograph 2289659).jpg )
- File:Deer stalking season, Glen Orrin - geograph.org.uk - 8630902.png (JPEG version File:Deer stalking season, Glen Orrin (geograph 8630902).jpg)
- File:Glenample Estates stalker talking to hillwalkers - geograph.org.uk - 2670631.png (JPEG version File:Glenample Estates stalker talking to hillwalkers (geograph 2670631).jpg)
bjh21 (talk) 17:07, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- I'd consider the inherent generation losses in JPEG versions a good reason to use PNG over JPEG, since images on Wikimedia Commons are edited quite regularly. --Tilon3 (talk) 17:58, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The original JPG files have not been edited regularly, so these files are redundant. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:25, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
This is an exact copy in PNG format of File:Flag of the Isle of Man Civil Defence Service.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:23, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- I (Martin Blackburn) was the person who commissioned its design so that we could have the standard manufactured. It replicates the UK standard save for substituting the Manx flag for the Union Flag.
- Taking a closer look, there is a very slight difference in the shades of the blue, red, and yellow used, but otherwise it is the same image. I can update the colours on the SVG version to match that on the PNG. Fry1989 eh? 18:02, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- It is unfortunate that the SVG version is so badly named, whilst the PNG is correctly named. It is a Civil Defence Corps (not Service, which is wrong) and the item depicted is a Standard (whilst flag is not incorrect, it is a broad and generic term; Standard is specific and accurate).Timothy Titus (talk) 21:36, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- The SVG can be renamed. Fry1989 eh? 22:25, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- I think that is the best plan. Tweak and rename the SVG, and delete the PNG.Timothy Titus (talk) 08:30, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- The SVG can be renamed. Fry1989 eh? 22:25, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- It is unfortunate that the SVG version is so badly named, whilst the PNG is correctly named. It is a Civil Defence Corps (not Service, which is wrong) and the item depicted is a Standard (whilst flag is not incorrect, it is a broad and generic term; Standard is specific and accurate).Timothy Titus (talk) 21:36, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Taking a closer look, there is a very slight difference in the shades of the blue, red, and yellow used, but otherwise it is the same image. I can update the colours on the SVG version to match that on the PNG. Fry1989 eh? 18:02, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:28, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
This appears to be a derivative work of the official Crush 40 logo that's featured on one of their album covers. The source describes it as a "trace", which implies that it isn't their original work. There's no evidence that the logo itself is freely licensed (and even if it was, the DeviantArt source doesn't verify a free license for this trace either). Mz7 (talk) 21:20, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: The following files are identical to this one in content, just lower quality: File:Crush 40 Logo small.jpg and File:Crush 40 Logo fit.jpg. Mz7 (talk) 18:53, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:48, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
@Glorious 93: tagged it as "copyvio", with the statement "NOT a simple logo. Still under copyrights by its rightful owner". I think it should be discussed first - Fma12 (talk) 21:45, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Comment Both the artistic representation of the stylized maple leafs and the ball, along with their combination (bottom part), make it difficult, at least in my humble opinion, for the logo not to meet the threshold of originality. --Glorious 93 (talk) 21:49, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Sincerely, I uploaded the logo based on my perception it is below the TOO, as the maple leaf is a PD symbol (as part of the flag of Canada, and the association football ball is an universal symbol and simple representation as well. - Fma12 (talk) 14:54, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: probably borderline but keep for now as per User:Fma12. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:30, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
I assumed that the poster was anonymous and therefore free per {{PD-Czechoslovakia-anon}} but actually the author has been identified as Andrej Kováčik[13] I cannot find a death date for him, but if he died after 1945 the work is not free per {{PD-Czechoslovakia-old}}. Buidhe (talk) 23:16, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Actually Kováčik continued to work until 1953 at least [14] Buidhe (talk) 23:28, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: according to Wikidata, he died in 1953. Undelete in 2040. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:37, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Work is 1928 despite what the metadata says and thus is not PD-US-expired as belived in good faith by uploader using IA metadata ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 23:51, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I wonder if this is still public domain, even if not {{PD-US-expired}}. For instance, if this can be considered a collective work, then according to COM:HAITI, copyright expired in 1989 (60 years after publication), prior to the URAA restoration date of 1996. Then again, "Official texts of a legislative, administrative or judiciary nature, and their official translations" are not protected at all. The title page of this work says Pour tous renseignements concernant le «Bulletin officiel des Arrêts du Tribunal de Cassation», s'adresser au chef de division du Département de la Justice. (translated: For all information concerning the "Official Bulletin of Judgments of the Court of Cassation", contact the head of division of the Department of Justice.). That sounds to me like it's an "official [text] of a...judiciary nature". Maybe keep with {{PD-Haiti}} and {{PD-1996}}? clpo13(talk) 00:08, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for the explanation. I'll let this DR run to get other views though. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 00:19, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- If judgments of the Tribunal are not texts of a judiciary nature, I don't know what can be. So, it seems this would be PD-Haiti. (For the U.S. status, we encounter the usual paradox with works that are uncopyrightable by nature in their counry of origin. According to some users on Commons, the theory is that those works acquired a U.S. copyright with the URAA, because the URAA created a U.S. copyright for foreign works, except specifically for works whose copyright had expired in their country of origin. And because uncopyrightable works did not lose copyright through expiration, they are not covered by the exception to the URAA. Or so is their theory.) -- Asclepias (talk) 15:19, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- Interesting note about URAA. In that case, perhaps {{PD-EdictGov}} would be a better option for a US tag. clpo13(talk) 15:33, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
- It looks like a good choice for the U.S. tag. Thank you. -- Asclepias (talk) 17:05, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
- Interesting note about URAA. In that case, perhaps {{PD-EdictGov}} would be a better option for a US tag. clpo13(talk) 15:33, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: licenses have been updated as per discussion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:45, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Actual publication date is c. 1940 given title page of work, despite what the metadata says and thus is not PD-US-expired as belived in good faith by uploader using IA metadata. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 23:53, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: licenses have been updated. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:47, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Actual publication date is 1944 , despite what the metadata says and thus is not PD-US-expired as believed in good faith by up-loader using IA metadataShakespeareFan00 (talk) 23:54, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: licenses have been updated. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:47, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Actual publication date is 1947-48 ? despite what the metadata says and thus is not PD-US-expired as believed in good faith by up-loader using IA metadata ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 23:55, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- And if this is deleted, please replace (temporarily) with a placeholder so it doesn't get re-uploaded by accident. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 00:09, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: licenses have been updated. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:47, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Plan 9 from Outer Space
editVRT agent (verify): ticket:2020062210010809.
Claim of copyright renewal has been supplied, and claim of PD due to non-renewal should be deemed not to be true.
Deletion was requested over OTRS. Starting discussion here.
- Copyright registered 1981-04-23 (PA 102-338).
- Copyright renewed on 1986-01-06 (RE 279 707).
- File:Boom mike.png
- File:Bunny Breckinridge (cropped).png
- File:Bunny Breckinridge.png
- File:Dudley.jpg
- File:Forrest J. Ackerman, collector of movie memorabilia, with fan..jpg
- File:Plan 9 Alternative poster.jpg
- File:Plan 9 Criswell.jpg
- File:Plan 9 from Outer Space (1959).webm
- File:Plan 9 from Outer Space (title screen).jpg
- File:Plan 9 from Outer Space - Criswell Predicts.ogv
- File:Plan 9 from Outer Space 1959 640 x 480.webm
- File:Plan 9 from Outer Space 1959.ogv
- File:Plan 9 from Outer Space still 1.jpg
- File:Plan nine from outer space.jpg
- File:Plan9-comparison.jpg
- File:Plan9SaucerShadow.jpg
- File:PlanNine 01.jpg
- File:PlanNine 02.jpg
- File:PlanNine 03.jpg
- File:PlanNine 04.jpg
- File:PlanNine 05.jpg
- File:PlanNine 06.jpg
- File:PlanNine 07.jpg
- File:PlanNine 08.jpg
- File:PlanNine 09.jpg
- File:PlanNine 10.jpg
- File:PlanNine 12.jpg
- File:PlanNine 13.jpg
- File:PlanNine 14.jpg
- File:Tor Johnson.jpg
- File:PlanNine 11 (brighter).jpg
- File:PlanNine 11.jpg
--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:40, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- Internet Archives claims that the copyright renewal was legally invalid for these reasons. See [15], so should Keep. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:51, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
- The above link is now dead, so for others' reference/convenience here's an archival link—this is also the source for the blockquote below. Brandt Luke Zorn (talk) 23:43, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Per internet Archive
Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:24, 22 June 2020 (UTC)COPYRIGHT NOTICE
From Video-Cellar: This film is in the public domain. “Grave Robbers From Outer Space” was originally published in the USA in 1959. The film was not immediately registered for copyright. It was registered by it's producer “Reynolds Pictures Inc.” in 1981 (PA0000102338).
The film's copyright was renewed in 1986 by Wade Williams 3 (RE0000279707). In 1981, Williams lodged a quitclaim from Kathy Wood (Edward D. Wood Jr.'s second wife [1956-his death] and heir. USCO doc. no. V1831P045) and separate quitclaims of interest from Norma McCarty (Edward D. Wood Jr.'s first wife - falsely listed on the filing as “Mrs. Edward D. Wood, Jr., successor of all rights to the Estate of Edward D. Wood, Jr.”, which she was not, as their marriage had been annulled) - and Reynolds Pictures, Inc.
This renewal was legally invalid for these reasons:
1) The registration and renewals were lodged providing the incorrect title on screen, date-in-notice and publication date for the original publication.
2) In order for a successor in interest to renew a copyright they have to demonstrate that they own the copyright through a valid transfer of rights from the party owning the copyright at or immediately before the renewal window. None of the parties Mr. Williams sought quitclaims from were valid owners of copyright immediately prior to the renewal window. Valid copyright successors for this film “James Flocker Enterprises Inc.”, “Gold Key Video”, "Vidtronics Inc.”, and “Medallion Pictures”, all companies who are successors in the chain of ownership post registration, are not present in Williams' quitclaims. Williams has, instead, provided the USCO with a series of meaningless assignments from parties which no longer held any copyright interest in the work in order to demonstrate “ownership” of the intellectual property in the film.
The screenplay was further registered as an unpublished work in 1989 (Pau001211635). This again is rendered legally invalid by the mere fact that large portions of the screenplay were previously published as part of the registered motion picture for which no valid copyright renewal exists.
- Keep No valid copyright renewal, as explained in full by Beyond My Ken above. JoJo Anthrax (talk) 02:46, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep This film is in the public domain. Terraflorin (talk) 07:49, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Given that Internet Archive is facing some "issues" currently over it's "liberal" interpretation of what copyright policy allows, I think Commons should treat a reasonable deletion request over OTRS as valid. Was the OTRS request from one of the parties named in the Copyright Office records? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:15, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- Apples and oranges, their current issues are not at all related to this. It's like saying that the US can't settle a fishing rights problem in Nova Scotia with Canada because it's in the middle of a trade war with China. Different things altogether.Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:55, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep, no reason provided why the OTRS request would be valid. After Distributors Corporation of America folded, the film was released in 1959 by Valient Pictures which did not file for copyright protection but distributed it under a states' right basis [16]. The PD rationale is not a lack of renewal but a lack of notice. — Racconish 💬 11:23, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep So, published in 1959 without notice, with a 1981 registration by someone who didn't actually establish that they owned the rights to the work? It's hard to see how that's anything other than public domain. --Tronvillain (talk) 20:56, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- Wait... the film was published with the copyright attributed to Reynolds Pictures Inc., 1958? And the registration for "Plan 9 from outer space / written, produced, directed by Edward D. Wood, Jr." (listed under "Title") with publication date 1958-05-01 in 1981 (PA0000102338 / 1981-04-23) was by "Reynolds Pictures, Inc., employer for hire", right? And then there's V1989P337, assignment of copyright for "Plan nine from outer space : a.k.a. Grave robbers from outer space; motion picture" from "Mrs. Edward D. Wood, Jr., successor of all rights to the Estate of Edward D. Wood, Jr. & Reynolds Pictures, Inc." to "Wade Williams 3d" (apparently the marriage to Norma McCarty was never annulled, though the current source for that on Wikipedia is... Wade Williams by way of the Hollywood Reporter); as well as V1831P045, an agreement between Kathy Wood and Wade H. Williams 3d about "Plan nine from outer space : a.k.a. Grave robbers from outer space; motion picture / By Edward D. Wood, Jr. DCR 1957." Then there's the renewal (RE0000278774 / 1986-01-06) for "Plan nine from outer space. By Reynolds Pictures, Inc" (PA0000112906 / 1958-04-03) by Wade H. Williams III (PWH). As the above essay says, neither the registration nor the renewal use the on-screen title (Plan 9 from Outer Space), and the registration and renewal date appear to have different publication dates (1958-05-01 versus 1958-04-03). Then there's whether or not Reynolds Pictures owned the rights in 1981 and whether Kathy Wood and Norma McCarty were the ones with the power to transfer the rights from Reynolds Pictures to Wade Williams, but I'm not clear how the quoted essay established that. --Tronvillain (talk) 23:04, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Looks like the IA page for the film was taken down. Does anyone know why? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:34, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete All of these rights (including Internet Archive has been deleted for copyright reasons) belonged to various owners, since copyright has been renewed. It would wait for another 35 years until it is public domain in 2055, by the rule of shorter term. --122.2.10.69 03:11, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
- I have posed an inquiry to the Internet Archive in Ticket:2020090310001055. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:33, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Even assuming the film remains under copyright, that would have no bearing on the copyright status of several of the files listed above. The film is at issue, and the screenshots are clear derivative works of the film, but these files are not derivative works of the film:
- Plan 9 Alternative poster.jpg, the main poster, is a separate work from the film itself: it's an illustration/advertisement published without a valid copyright notice before the release of the film.
- Forrest J. Ackerman, collector of movie memorabilia, with fan..jpg is a photo whose creator donated it to the public domain.
- Plan 9 from Outer Space still 1.jpg was a publicity film still—i.e. a photograph taken on set during production, not a screenshot from the film itself—and the question of its copyright status has to be considered independently. Brandt Luke Zorn (talk) 19:17, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep No need to say "Undelete in 2055", the URAA failed to apply in all of these cases. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:57, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
- Not an URAA-restored work. --Frontman830 (talk) 08:56, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
- Regardless of the copyright status of this film, URAA cannot possibly be relevant here, as this is a US work. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:02, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Per discussion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:32, 28 May 2021 (UTC)