Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/10/18

Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive October 18th, 2017
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have a problem. Bapipal (talk) 11:22, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion of a talk page. Ruthven (msg) 13:31, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Marie-Paule Haar (b. 1940). Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:27, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: OTRS needed. Ruthven (msg) 13:30, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{duplicate}} Mylife191 (talk) 07:31, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

{{duplicate}}File:Dulyanan Mylife191 (talk) 07:32, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dulyanan Mylife191 (talk) 07:36, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

{{Delete}} Mylife191 (talk) 07:46, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

{{duplicate|File:Dulyanan.jpg}} Mylife191 (talk) 08:12, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

{{db-user}} 27.145.136.128 08:22, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: I've removed the extra headings from this request, and applied {{Tlx}} to those templates that are meant to be applied to file pages and not to deletion requests themselves. --bjh21 (talk) 12:00, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unused user page image. --JuTa 16:06, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pornographic and shows up when children search swimming for a hobby. 207.165.194.2 20:40, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Clearly in scope. I ask all the time how to this anonymous IP´s always find images of nudity when they are "not" searching it and the in a epiphany nominate this images for deletion.

The mere depiction of a nude woman swimming is pornographic, i.e. the explicit and graphic portrail of sexual relationships? Only her breasts and pubic hair is showing, like the painting La maja desnuda by Goya and that is not pornographic, except to some religious fundamentalists and moral crusaders. Please read or listen to the 44 years old Miller v. California. Also the old, tired and repetitive of Think of the children is getting used with the mere purpose of censorship of mere nudity. If the person behind this IP is ashamed - or merely pudic- of it´s body so be it, it is his values, but trying to impose their moral crusade to other people is called censhorship. Wont someone think of the children is the mantra of those that want to create a fake moral panic and have no other arguments and try to use this "argument" to close discussions. Tm (talk) 21:29, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9   18:50, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This comes up on a student device search of "swimming." This is not an appropriate image for students in a classrom to view. 209.129.247.244 20:46, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion; COM:NOTCENSORED. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 20:51, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nudity showing in student google search results for "swimming" 205.196.190.8 20:57, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Time for a SPI? -- (talk) 21:47, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Repeating my argumentation of the first DR. Clearly in scope. I ask all the time how to this anonymous IP´s always find images of nudity when they are "not" searching it and the in a epiphany nominate this images for deletion.

The mere depiction of a nude woman swimming is pornographic, i.e. the explicit and graphic portrail of sexual relationships? Only her breasts and pubic hair is showing, like the painting La maja desnuda by Goya and that is not pornographic, except to some religious fundamentalists and moral crusaders. Please read or listen to the 44 years old Miller v. California. Also the old, tired and repetitive of Think of the children is getting used with the mere purpose of censorship of mere nudity. If the person behind this IP is ashamed - or merely pudic- of it´s body so be it, it is his values, but trying to impose their moral crusade to other people is called censhorship. Wont someone think of the children is the mantra of those that want to create a fake moral panic and have no other arguments and try to use this "argument" to close discussions.

Adding to the arguments, i find this DR´s interesting. The 3 IP´s are associated with schools and Universities. 207.165.194.2 is associated with the Heartland Area Education Agency 11 of Johnston, Iowa; 209.129.247.244 with the California State University, Office of the Chancellor; and 205.196.190.8 with the Humble Independent School District of Kingwood, Texas. In this three school districts and universities (where the majority of students are adults, by the way) doesn't anyone control what the students are doing? No one in this schools ever heard of Content-control software? It must be easier to do nothing and expect other sites to do your work. Tm (talk) 02:56, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Quick Kept per previous discussions. Please do not renominate without additional reasons. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:40, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Commons is not a personal photo album. Wikicology (talk) 18:57, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:57, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arishfa khan (talk · contribs)

edit

Unhelpful personal photos

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 07:14, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 08:27, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo (out of scope); also, likely copyrighted Ankry (talk) 19:11, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy; per ticket:2017101810011976. --Ankry (talk) 09:10, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:13, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal imageː Selfie Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · mail) 08:34, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 08:25, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I`m not satisfied with the quality of the work I uploaded Otake photo (talk) 10:29, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Uploader requested and unused.--Fanghong (talk) 08:29, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have a problem 223.176.89.227 11:32, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 08:31, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope personal image, file with same filename has been deleted before for same reason. -★- PlyrStar93. Message me. 20:07, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: by Fanghong. --Didym (talk) 21:38, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope 2A01:CB06:28C:B800:9CD8:317B:3068:29EC 11:49, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 08:32, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope 2A01:CB06:28C:B800:9CD8:317B:3068:29EC 11:50, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I haven't looked at the file, but can imagine more or less what it is. I think we have some blue links that help to eliminate excess of this kind of exhibitionism. COM:PENCIL or something like that. --E4024 (talk) 12:42, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 08:33, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Ruthven (msg) 13:36, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 08:34, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file in Category:Developers. E4024 (talk) 14:04, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 08:36, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 08:37, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Iqrarijaz (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 08:38, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 08:39, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope, poor quality for camera shake. Categorizing (talk) 07:00, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:40, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No useful description or categories. No educational use. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:59, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:42, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused unidentified logos of non-notable organizations .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:00, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:42, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Monamir7 (talk · contribs)

edit

All images seem to be photographs of images of food on a computer screen of unknown copyright status. The quality of these images is extremely low and they will probably never be used in a project.

Takeaway (talk) 13:28, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:43, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Français : Fichier en PDF, qui n'est généralement pas authorisé pour les cartes. Des doutes sur l'origine de l'oeuvre.
English: Wrong file format for a map (PDF). Claim of own work doubtful for such a complex map; source should be better specified if published under free license.

-Ruthven (msg) 13:28, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:44, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abramob igor (talk · contribs)

edit

Spamer's contribution. Logo license can be fake. Not in use.

Bilderling (talk) 13:35, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:44, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The page this personal image was used for was deleted for being out of project scope. Searingjet (talk) 13:42, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - personal images are allowed only for the active contributors. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:46, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files used for ADVERT from different sources: some are from FB (see EXIF), others are posters of recent theatre works, others are shot with a Canon camera. Such inconsistency either needs some OTRS permissions from the authors, or it's just the upload of several files taken from the Net.

Ruthven (msg) 13:42, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:47, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ramy ALmelegy (talk · contribs)

edit

Screenshots or taken from alghad.tv. To be checked if simple copyvio or if certain files can be kept because below ToO (change of license needed in this case).

Ruthven (msg) 13:48, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted by EugeneZelenko. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:47, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

given this appears to be a formal photographic portrait it's highly unlikely that it's available under a free licence Ivar the Boneful (talk) 13:50, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no permission. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:48, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Marie-Paule Haar (b. 1940). Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:52, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:49, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Marie-Paule Haar (b. 1940). Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:52, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:49, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Marie-Paule Haar (b. 1940). Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:53, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:49, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Marie-Paule Haar (b. 1940). Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:53, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:49, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Marie-Paule Haar (b. 1940). Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:54, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:49, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Marie-Paule Haar (b. 1940). Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:54, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:50, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Existent in many pages on the internet before uploading date Ruthven (msg) 14:01, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - available in the web before the upload here http://www.algerie-dz.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-89648.html leading to http://i48.servimg.com/u/f48/12/48/16/60/dsc00412.jpg. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:57, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bravery90 (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 14:53, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bravery90 (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:57, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bravery90 (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:43, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Ukraine.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:26, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:00, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Israel.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:35, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:00, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable use. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:09, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(from User talk:Magog the Ogre) There is no copyright issue with File:Set has first local maximum at 137.pdf because I'm the author of the plot. Korablino (talk) 18:23, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:01, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:10, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:01, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:10, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:02, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:10, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:02, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:11, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:03, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:11, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:03, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:11, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:03, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal file, out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:19, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:04, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal files, out of project scope

Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:28, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:04, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User logo, orphaned since August 2014. Out of project scope. xplicit 05:21, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:05, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Orphaned logo, unused since February 2013. Commons is not a webhost and out of project scope. xplicit 05:24, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:06, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's userpage was speedily deleted in September 2012 as spam. Out of project scope. xplicit 05:26, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:05, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified orphaned logo, unused since October 2014. Commons is not a webhost and out of project scope. xplicit 05:39, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:06, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted in February 2014 as spam. Out of project scope. xplicit 05:41, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:06, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Orphaned radio station logo, unused since November 2011. Commons is not a webhost and out of project scope. xplicit 05:45, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:07, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted in October 2012 as non-notable. Out of project scope. xplicit 05:47, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:07, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the user's subpage was speedily deleted in September 2012 as spam. Out of project scope. xplicit 05:53, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:07, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dip Esh B

edit

Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted in January 2017 as non-notable. Out of project scope.

xplicit 05:56, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:08, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Parmod30 (talk · contribs)

edit

possibly copyrighted text, personal file is out of scope

Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:23, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:08, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Africa 24 (talk · contribs)

edit

unused personal images : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:25, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:14, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:30, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:14, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:30, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:13, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:32, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:11, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:33, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:12, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:33, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:12, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Orphaned radio station logo, unused since August 2012. Commons is not a webhost and out of project scope. xplicit 05:58, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:34, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope, poor quality for camera shake. Categorizing (talk) 07:16, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:35, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope, poor quality for camera shake and out of focus. Categorizing (talk) 07:20, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:35, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope, poor quality for camera shake and out of focus. Categorizing (talk) 07:21, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:35, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope, poor quality and out of focus. Categorizing (talk) 07:36, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:37, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope, poor quality for out of focus. Categorizing (talk) 07:43, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:37, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope, poor quality and out of focus. Categorizing (talk) 07:49, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:37, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality. See COM:PENIS TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 07:59, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:36, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selbst hochgeladen. Wurde durch bessere Grafik ersetzt. Bitte löschen. Geo-Science-International (talk) 14:29, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:38, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selbst hochgeladen. Wurde durch bessere Grafik ersetzt. Bitte löschen. Geo-Science-International (talk) 14:29, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:39, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selbst hochgeladen. Wurde durch bessere Grafik ersetzt. Bitte löschen. Geo-Science-International (talk) 14:30, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:39, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:40, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:40, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:53, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gertrude83 (talk · contribs)

edit

Per COM:NOTHOST: self-created artworks which, especially now that the uploads are only partial, are unlikely to be used in a project.

Takeaway (talk) 15:18, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:53, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gertrude83 (talk · contribs)

edit

Possible copyright violation. Per https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gebruiker:Gertrude83/Kladblok these artworks were created by Jozef de Schrijver (born 1916) Unclear who owns the rights to these artworks. To uploader: please follow the procedure as explained in COM:OTRS.

Takeaway (talk) 12:55, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:49, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uesless black photo Artix Kreiger (talk) 16:53, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:55, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:07, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:56, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:12, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:55, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:15, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:55, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Berry geezy (talk · contribs)

edit

unused personal images : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:17, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:57, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:18, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:56, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:19, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:56, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:20, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:57, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:33, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:59, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal and not used 176.239.88.193 21:05, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:59, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:24, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:01, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:26, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:01, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:22, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:21, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:26, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:02, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:29, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:18, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:30, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:18, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:30, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:19, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:30, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:19, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it seems to be a DW of something (see source) file description incompatible with the license "Does not use it for any purpose before asking the owner." Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:38, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 10:59, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious personal work El Funcionario (talk) 19:09, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 10:58, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious personal work El Funcionario (talk) 19:10, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 10:58, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious personal work El Funcionario (talk) 19:11, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 10:58, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious personal work El Funcionario (talk) 19:11, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 10:58, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious personal work El Funcionario (talk) 19:12, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 10:58, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Half of Edgardo Rocha 176.239.88.193 20:54, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: corrupt file, also suspected copyright violation. --Didym (talk) 10:54, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Enthält Fehler mit Balken, Ersatzdatei bereits hochgeladen Reto1962 (talk) 21:31, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 10:53, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Enthält Fehler mit Balken, Ersatzdatei hochgeladen Reto1962 (talk) 21:33, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 10:52, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Enthält Fehler mit Balken, Ersatzdatei bereits hochgeladen Reto1962 (talk) 21:34, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 10:52, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-distorted, vector file available as File:Pancasila Sila 1 Star.svg. Fry1989 eh? 22:49, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 10:50, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-distorted, vector file available as File:Pancasila Sila 2 Chain.svg. Fry1989 eh? 22:50, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 10:49, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-distorted, vector file available as File:Pancasila Sila 3 Banyan Tree.svg. Fry1989 eh? 22:52, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 10:49, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-distorted, vector file available as File:Pancasila Sila 4 Buffalo's Head.svg. Fry1989 eh? 22:53, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 10:48, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-distorted, vector file available as File:Pancasila Sila 5 Rice and Cotton.svg. Fry1989 eh? 22:54, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 10:48, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kennwes32 (talk · contribs)

edit

User with a history of uploading copyright violations. At least one of these images resolves to an external site on Google Images.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:16, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 10:47, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:26, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 10:47, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:29, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 10:46, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a professional photo, as indicated by the watermark on the image, not taken by the user as claimed. Dan arndt (talk) 23:45, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 10:41, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope, poor quality and out of focus. Categorizing (talk) 07:24, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:25, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ths image have no indication of have free rights. Rextron (talk) 07:27, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PRP. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:25, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je suis le créateur de cette photo. Je ne souhaite pas que mon domicile soit identifiable. /// I have made this picture. I don't want that people can see my home. Éric Messel (Déposer un message) 15:56, 18 October 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: Uploader request. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:28, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je suis le créateur de cette photo. Je ne souhaite pas que mon domicile soit identifiable. /// I have made this picture. I don't want that people can see my home. Éric Messel (Déposer un message) 15:57, 18 October 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: Uploader request. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:28, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je suis le créateur de cette photo. Je ne souhaite pas que mon domicile soit identifiable. /// I have made this picture. I don't want that people can see my home. Éric Messel (Déposer un message) 15:58, 18 October 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: Uploader request. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:28, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je suis le créateur de cette photo. Je ne souhaite pas que mon domicile soit identifiable. /// I have made this picture. I don't want that people can see my home. Éric Messel (Déposer un message) 15:58, 18 October 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: Uploader request. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:28, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je suis le créateur de cette photo. Je ne souhaite pas que mon domicile soit identifiable. /// I have made this picture. I don't want that people can see my home. Éric Messel (Déposer un message) 15:59, 18 October 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: Uploader request. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:28, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je suis le créateur de cette photo. Je ne souhaite pas que mon domicile soit identifiable. /// I have made this picture. I don't want that people can see my home. Éric Messel (Déposer un message) 15:59, 18 October 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: Uploader request. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:28, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je suis le créateur de cette photo. Je ne souhaite pas que mon domicile soit identifiable. /// I have made this picture. I don't want that people can see my home. Éric Messel (Déposer un message) 16:00, 18 October 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: Uploader request. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:28, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je suis le créateur de cette photo. Je ne souhaite pas que mon domicile soit identifiable. /// I have made this picture. I don't want that people can see my home. Éric Messel (Déposer un message) 16:00, 18 October 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: Uploader request. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:28, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright holder : Marcel Van Coile. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:33, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, we need OTRS permission from Marcel Van Coile. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:35, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright holder : Marcel Van Coile. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:33, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, we need OTRS permission from Marcel Van Coile. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:35, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright holder : Marcel Van Coile. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:34, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, we need OTRS permission from Marcel Van Coile. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:35, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright holder : Marcel Van Coile. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:35, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, we need OTRS permission from Marcel Van Coile. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:36, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wickd1336 (talk · contribs)

edit

copyrighted screenshots from a software

Artix Kreiger (talk) 17:07, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Indeed, ArcGIS software are copyrighted. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:37, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small and pixelated; Category:Fermatas has lots of svg and png alternatives DMacks (talk) 03:45, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:20, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely an image found on the Internet, not own work. B dash (talk) 05:08, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not found on the internet using Google Image. P 1 9 9   20:23, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Needs evidence that the uploader has authority to release the image under a CC licence. Source site states "Copyright © 2014 - 2017 Mapsystems. All rights reserved" John of Reading (talk) 06:26, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:24, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of focus, poor quality and out of focus. Categorizing (talk) 07:51, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unusable. P 1 9 9   20:25, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose BeckenhamBear (talk) 14:40, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:26, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from presentation. Should be cropped/blanked to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:26, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Scott Gregory Beach (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:31, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a screenshot. Am I wrong? E4024 (talk) 15:19, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: dubious source and author. P 1 9 9   20:32, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Many professions per categories but IMHO this is a personal pic OoS. E4024 (talk) 15:23, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Cristalino Dino isn't mentioned neither in en.wiki, es.wiki nor in it.wiki. Taivo (talk) 14:19, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:32, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photoshoot taken from a promotional video. Is this considered "own work"? E4024 (talk) 15:33, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete This would be considered "own work" if the person that made the screenshot\screen was the same that made the video or had the copyright to it, but given the description i think this most likely a derivative work by someone making a copyright violation. Tm (talk) 01:27, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   20:32, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Totally blurred. Useless. Zinnmann (talk) 16:05, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not useless, lieber Zinnmann. Teil meines Künstlerprojektes. Behalten !!! --Frze > talk 17:30, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ich lass mich ja gerne überzeugen. Aber worin besteht Dein Künstlerprojekt und inwiefern fällt es in den Aufgabenbereich von wikicommons? --Zinnmann (talk) 20:35, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Lass Dich überraschen, Neugierskarlele. --Frze > talk 18:35, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, unusable. P 1 9 9   20:33, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality, no description. Zinnmann (talk) 16:08, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Beschreibung folgt, lieber Zinnmann. Teil meines Künstlerprojektes. Behalten !!! --Frze > talk 17:30, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:35, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Massively blurred image that doesn't show the subject mentioned in the description (planting of oaks) Zinnmann (talk) 16:23, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not useless, lieber Zinnmann. Teil meines Künstlerprojektes. Behalten !!! --Frze > talk 17:27, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:35, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Massively blurred image that doesn't show the subject mentioned in the description (planting of oaks) Zinnmann (talk) 16:23, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not useless, lieber Zinnmann. Teil meines Künstlerprojektes. Behalten !!! --Frze > talk 17:28, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:35, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan.

Ras67 (talk) 00:25, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:49, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan for buildings, sculptures, artistic monuments and murals.

Ras67 (talk) 20:17, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:00, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Character depicted (Rarity) is copyrighted by Hasbro. Yoshiman6464 (talk) 00:27, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:50, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no indication that it is in public domain Texniths (talk) 00:30, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:50, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication that it's public domain. Person lived between 1911 and 1999 Texniths (talk) 00:31, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:50, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Even if the creator is anonymous, it can't be public domain as it was taken in 1950s (possibly 1958) Texniths (talk) 00:32, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:50, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan for buildings, sculptures and artistic monuments. We need the artist's or architect's, respectively their heir's permission to publish these pictures under a free licence! Commercial use must be possible!

Ras67 (talk) 13:56, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Предлагаю убрать шаблон удаления со следующих файлов, так как в них нет никаких нарушений: (I suggest removing the deletion pattern from the following files, as there are no violations in them:)

Георгий Долгопский (talk) 08:24, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    • Until 2050, for the period of the lease of the city of Baikonur by Russia, Baikonur has the status of a city of federal significance of the Russian Federation and Russian jurisdiction operates in the city and cosmodrome. The jurisdiction of Kazakhstan does not apply here. Accordingly, the building can be loaded. Георгий Долгопский (talk) 17:38, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:30, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan for buildings, sculptures and artistic monuments. We need the artist's or architect's, respectively their heir's permission to publish these pictures under a free licence! Commercial use must be possible! Please desist from uploading of images from copyrighted things here on Commons. You can upload them into the Russian Wikipedia, like here.

Ras67 (talk) 16:02, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:06, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication that is delivered under this license in the source Texniths (talk) 00:35, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:51, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source information. If this isn't the work of Mr. Burdick's employer, the state government, rather than the federal government, it is presumably not public domain. —innotata 00:52, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:52, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There was a long discussion on this photo as well as the Mike Pence portrait. Through an OTRS ticket, the author has not released the works regardless of whether or not the White House says it is. This photo was also asked to be undeleted in July 2017, but was ultimately denied. This file should be deleted based off of prior discussion(s). Pinging @BU Rob13: who is the administrator that verified the ticket. Corky Buzz by the Hornet's Nest 00:53, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. The official government website from whence this image came has a link to “copyright policy” which says: “Except where otherwise noted, third-party content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.” If someone is disputing that, they should file a lawsuit, IMHO. In the mean time, we have to go by what the official website officially says. Right?Anythingyouwant (talk) 05:55, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete unless somebody has a new argument. We don't get unlimited bites at the apple. Mandruss (talk) 06:03, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
According to the Administrators and OTRS volunteers, ticket:2017050810015705 contains the information from the author himself. They've already verified it, so we clearly cannot use it. Just wait until they release the official portraits which have yet to be taken. Corky Buzz by the Hornet's Nest 07:37, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - There is still no evidence whatsoever that the copyright holder has released the photo under a compatible license. Nothing has changed since the previous discussions.- MrX 15:26, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - For reasons already mentioned. LieutenantLeroy (talk) 20:29, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. If OTRS reviewers and WMF have confirmed that this is not in the public domain, that is the end of the story. It's perplexing that this is so, and I wonder at the exact facts here, but the entire community doesn't always get the satisfaction in cases like these. Anyway, it's not like we're suffering from an absence of pictures of the man. Snow (talk) 06:58, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - Sometime today, I am planning to Twitter DM Doug Coulter, the copyright holder of the photo, and ask him about whether it is actually free. When he responds, I will pass the DM on to OTRS and let them look at it. Hopefully, my DMing Coulter will settle this debate for good. Philroc (talk) 15:13, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Although Coulter does not name a specific license, it is clear that he is OK with the image being on Commons. He says, among other things, "Coincidentally, I looked at the image again today and noticed it reflected the proper authorship, Doug Coulter. If this can be left as is, it’s fine with me." It seems to me that that is a sufficient expression of intent that the image should be left on Commons in accordance with our rules -- a free license with attribution required. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:03, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Just noting the following - the file was moved and then re-deleted (not by me). The file must remain deleted until a specific licence is made clear by the author/copyright holder. I know Jim means well, but such a laissez faire attitude to copyright isn't acceptable. If the author comes back and says I want a NC (Non Commercial) licence, or a ND (No Derivatives) licence, or even an SA (ShareAlike) licence, then anybody using the file on the assumption it's under a simple CC-BY licence are going to be up shit creek sans paddle. I would also note, we really would like to know the version of the licence selection since that's got some impact on re-users too. Nick (talk) 06:58, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While this image is in the public domain in Venezuela, it appears to be an original rendition of the coat of arms, eligible for copyright in the United States. The source site gives permission under CC BY-NC, but we can't accept it under this non-commercial license. Guanaco (talk) 01:44, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:04, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [1]. Yann (talk) 08:56, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image of deviantart was Creative Commons - No Commercial - No derivatives, which means that its not allowed for use on the wiki. Paleocolour (talk) 02:14, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:04, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible flickrwash Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:18, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The whole stream looks suspicious, should be investigated and added to untrusted Flickr user list furter uploads deleted. --Denniss (talk) 09:36, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:05, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:2012 IIFA Awards

edit

These photos were taken during the IIFA Awards ceremony 2012 held in Singapore. Template:Cc-by-3.0-BollywoodHungama clearly states that the CC-BY-3.0 license permission does not extend to non-Indian events. So these images aren't under CC-BY-3.0 license and are most likely copyrighted. --Skr15081997 (talk) 13:10, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

These photos were taken during the IIFA Awards ceremony 2012 held in Singapore. Template:Cc-by-3.0-BollywoodHungama clearly states that the CC-BY-3.0 license permission does not extend to non-Indian events. So these images aren't under CC-BY-3.0 license and are most likely copyrighted.

Skr15081997 (talk) 14:42, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:11, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These photos were taken during the IIFA Awards ceremony 2012 held in Singapore. Template:Cc-by-3.0-BollywoodHungama clearly states that the CC-BY-3.0 license permission does not extend to non-Indian events. So these images aren't under CC-BY-3.0 license and are most likely copyrighted.

Skr15081997 (talk) 05:23, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - noe that the cat contains another 60 images not nominated above, so it cannot be deleted. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:13, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These photos were taken during the IIFA Awards ceremony 2012 held in Singapore. Template:Cc-by-3.0-BollywoodHungama clearly states that the CC-BY-3.0 license permission does not extend to non-Indian events. So these images aren't under CC-BY-3.0 license and are most likely copyrighted. The remaining (returns) files in the category were most probably taken at Chhatrapati Shivaji International Airport, Mumbai, India so they are acceptable.

Skr15081997 (talk) 07:13, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:00, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Saudi66 (talk · contribs)

edit

Geringe Auflösung, meistens keine EXIF-Daten. Einige Fotos können auf Twitter,Facebook und anderswo gefunden werden. Die alten Fotos sind wahrscheinlich nicht eigenes Werk. (Low resolution, mostly no EXIF data. Some photos can be found on Twitter, Facebook and elsewhere. The old photos are probably not their own work.)

Hystrix (talk) 06:50, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:14, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I appear on this photo. It was uploaded without my permission! Please remove it. ערן בדינרי (talk) 07:53, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - We rarely take images down at the request of the subject and never at the request of an anonymous user. You may ask using OTRS for the image to be taken down, but it is unlikely. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:16, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. 2A01:73C0:503:B065:0:0:3206:1178 15:39, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion and no doubt this photo was made by the uploader. --Ellywa (talk) 20:27, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded in 2016 as "own work", but appeared in the same resolution and format on a videogame website in 2014 (https://web.archive.org/web/20141110104437/https://www.taringa.net/posts/info/18069279/Top-5-de-los-Juegos-MOBA-Online-2014.html). Gapfall (talk) 07:54, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:16, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

When the uploader says this is their own work "reproduction of the minimap featured in the video game", they appear to mean that it's a screenshot they took. (Original can be seen in eg. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mv9C9Rz6wXQ) Gapfall (talk) 08:53, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:17, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 1Veertje as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No fop in Iceland. FOP-related deletions should have full DRs so that they can be properly archived in case FOP situation changes. Storkk (talk) 09:53, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:17, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 1Veertje as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No fop in Iceland. FOP-related deletions should have full DRs so that they can be properly archived in case FOP situation changes. Storkk (talk) 09:54, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:17, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tiny photo (213×180 pixels) without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Probably not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:55, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:17, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Djernielotp (talk · contribs)

edit

Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata, and watermarks identifying several different people as authors.

LX (talk, contribs) 09:57, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:18, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Soumya-8974

edit

Soumya-8974 (talk · contribs)

User writes "Own work". This rocket belongs according to en:BFR (rocket) to the Space Exploration Technologies Corp. --Emha (talk) 10:07, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find the rights for this particular images but a lot of spacex images are on the public domain, see spacex flickr.Quantanew (talk) 03:14, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - these appear much larger in many copyrighted places. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:20, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Composite image without proper source info for individual elements Ytoyoda (talk) 12:08, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:21, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Composite image without adequate source info Ytoyoda (talk) 12:09, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:21, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The graffiti in this takes up nearly half the image. So it seems doubtful that COM:DM would apply. No indication the creator of the graffiti has licensed the work appropriately. GMGtalk 12:18, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: This is in the Netherlands, which has broad FoP. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:23, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Avatar created with some software; I suppose that the drawing is licensed to the original software maker. Ruthven (msg) 13:22, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

https://pickaface.net/ is the website and they do not claim copyright on any of the images created as they are a representation of the author them self.

This avatar was created for this specific purpose. The removal is unnecessary and I believe incorrect. If the file must be removed so be it! =]

Here is the license given for the image.

https://pickaface.net/faq.html

LICENSE:

Can I use avatars I created from pickaface.net for commercial use? You can use avatars you created from pickaface.net for personal, educational and commercial use. Redistribution, release for download or selling of these avatars on another site without permission is completely prohibited.

We’d appreciate if you give us credit or even link to http://pickaface.net if you use avatars created from pickaface.net. If you can't, please consider purchasing the hi-res version which doesn't require attribution. As a note this file was purchased in HIRES format which requires no attribution what-so-ever.

https://pickaface.net/terms.html

Restrictions on Use of Materials

Unless otherwise specified, we grant you a non-exclusive, non-transferable, limited right to access, use and display this Website and the material provided hereon for your personal, noncommercial use, provided that you comply fully with the provisions of these Terms & Conditions. Andrewbullock (talk) 14:32, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, so there are few issues that makes me perplex: 1) no credit is given to pickaface.net, 2) the CC by-sa license is not specified by the copyright holder, 3) I read at the Terms and Conditions link above: "provided hereon for your personal, noncommercial use", which seems to contradict the above permission and Commons' guidelines. --Ruthven (msg) 22:21, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


I totally understand as that confused me as well. If you feel their license does not allow this please remove the file. I don't feel the need to fight this any more. Thanks. As a note no credit is required based on the fact that this is their HIRES purchased image version. (Due to the size) Andrewbullock (talk) 11:19, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We'll let the matter be decided by the admin closing this request: a third opinion is always welcome. --Ruthven (msg) 11:54, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for your work on this! I appreciate the help and guidance! =] As someone very new to editing on Wikipedia I'm learning more and more each day!Andrewbullock (talk) 12:44, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Purchase PROOF: https://www2.gltech.org/imagebank/purchase.PNG Andrewbullock (talk) 12:51, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As a note I have updated the file on Wikimedia Commons to reflect the license and source. I must of missed this when submitting the image. I am doing this in good faith to try to correct my mistake. Andrewbullock (talk) 00:54, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Updated again Andrewbullock (talk) 21:57, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion -- user page image -- AB is an active contributor so this should be fine.

As far as the Pickface terms go, Pickface is not the creator of the avatar, so they have no rights in the copyright, just as Microsoft has no copyright rights in works created with MS Word. The copyright to the avatar is owned by the creator. Any restriction on the use of the avatar which Pickface might impose is a non-copyright restriction, which does not concern us.

The Pickface FAQ on the subject directly contradicts itself:

" Can I use avatars I created from pickaface.net for commercial use?
You can use avatars you created from pickaface.net for personal, educational and commercial use. Redistribution, release for download or selling of these avatars on another site without permission is completely prohibited."

So, commercial use is both permitted and prohibited. Since legal rules of construction require that ambiguities such as this be construed against the drafter (against Pickface), I doubt that the prohibition sentence here is enforceable, but as I noted above, it is irrelevant for Commons. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:25, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Indian army photos

edit

All of these files are similar to those previously deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/File:GEN BIPIN RAWAT.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Zwerubae and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Major R Parameshwaran.jpg. The source given for these files is the Indian Army website, but its licensing is too restrictive for Commons because it requires that images on the website not be used in a "derogatory manner or in a misleading context". COM:L, however, requires that files be licensed for any purpose, including parodies and other derivatives even if they are misleading or derogatory. -- Marchjuly (talk) 14:16, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:26, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: {{GODL-India}} Yann (talk) 11:58, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Indian airforce photos

edit

All of these files are similar to those previously deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/File:GEN BIPIN RAWAT.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Zwerubae and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Major R Parameshwaran.jpg. The source given for these files is the Indian Airforce website, but its licensing is too restrictive for Commons because it requires that images on the website not be used in a "derogatory manner or in a misleading context". COM:L, however, requires that files be licensed for any purpose, including parodies and other derivatives even if they are misleading or derogatory. -- Marchjuly (talk) 14:35, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:26, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: {{GODL-India}} Yann (talk) 09:48, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EmperorJomes (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of Commons:Project scope: symbols of fictitious state of questionable notability. Used in draft which is not reviewed.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:27, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AquaUrânia (talk · contribs)

edit

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:27, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright, not own work Bukij1 (talk) 14:54, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'm in the process of trying to figure out the status of this photo. It's part of a collection held by the student's university archive. Their teacher has told me that the image falls in the public domain, based on communication with the library staff. However I know that we need proof of this, so I would like to know what we would need to prove this. Would a citation work in this situation? They don't have this uploaded to the Internet anywhere. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 14:54, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: This is a US image. It may or may not be PD, depending on its publication history which has not been given. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:30, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Peterson99 (talk · contribs)

edit

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://afrofusionbrands.com/afb2/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/BANKOUROU.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:30, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It looks like this young man has joined Commons/WP only to hang his pic on the wall. E4024 (talk) 14:57, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep For now, even if this was his only edit, give some time to see if this 1 monthh old account will contribute more, as this image is used in this user personal page. If after some time passes (like 6 months) then this maybe could be deleted. Tm (talk) 01:32, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: It doesn't work that way -- first you contribute, then you post your photo. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:32, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 15:12, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:32, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is government portrait. Not sure if it is the uploader's "own work" (someone edited after this deletion requests). And the flag looked bad too (edited maybe?). Hddty. (talk) 15:52, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:32, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fedecardio (talk · contribs)

edit

I don't see a source for the uploads by this user. They seem to be taken from a website. One looks like a promo photo and another is a screenshot.

Artix Kreiger (talk) 16:12, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:33, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Icaro Felipe (talk · contribs)

edit

Copyrighted photos

Artix Kreiger (talk) 16:22, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:33, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jeremynabors (talk · contribs)

edit

Time lapse video footage is no longer considered public domain, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Colorado State Stadium panorama 2017-08-18.jpg

Ytoyoda (talk) 16:58, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:33, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong image for watch 09182. correct image is uploaded as Belmont2 Charles Frodsham (talk) 17:14, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion -- use {{t|rename} if needed. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:35, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This computer rendering of the United States Coast Guard (USCG) Offshore Patrol Cutter (OPC) design is not the work of an employee of the USCG, as claimed. It originates from Eastern Shipbuilding Group, the OPC shipbuilder, as can be seen by the captions for the identical images at not only USCG sites (dcms.uscg.mil: "Notional offshore patrol cutter design courtesy of Eastern Shipbuilding Group" and coastguard.dodlive.mil: "A computer rendering of the Coast Guard’s new Offshore Patrol Cutter. Eastern Shipbuilding Group") but also third-parties (upi.com: "Photo courtesy Eastern Shipbuilding Group"). —RP88 (talk) 19:51, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why would this lead to deletion of the photo? The rights of the photo were give to the USCG (as claimed on their page) and as such are public domain. The rendering is factually correct, unless there is an intellectual rights violation (which again, as posted on a US Government Website, as stated in the photo's metadata, this is in the public domain? I'm not sure I understand the request for deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by REJ17 (talk • contribs) 20:48, 18 October 2017‎ (UTC)[reply]
The copyright to this rendering is almost certainly still held by Eastern Shipbuilding Group (the "courtesy of" wording is shorthand for "with the permission of"). Even if the copyright had been transferred to the USCG, that would not place the rendering in the public domain. While it is true that works created by the U.S. federal government are in the public domain, the U.S. federal government can, and does, routinely hold copyright to work created by others. —RP88 (talk)

Deleted: per nomination - As noted, even if the buidler transferred the copyright, which is very unlikely, the government does not routinely release third party copyrights which it owns. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:38, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not think that PD-1923 is correct here!! 178.27.111.220 20:03, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Citing the license box: "Public domain works must be out of copyright in both the United States and in the source country of the work in order to be hosted on the Commons. If the work is not a U.S. work, the file must have an additional copyright tag indicating the copyright status in the source country." --178.27.111.220 20:24, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - the question is when and if it went out of copyright in the country of origin. The USA is probably irrelevant. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:39, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete. Out of scope; not a notable person, or musician. Liya Dovgalyuk's article at English-language WP has been deleted. ——Chalk19 (talk) 22:01, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:40, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and File:Anubandha Awards 2015 T&C.pdf

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:29, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:40, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope, poor quality and out of focus. Categorizing (talk) 07:14, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:46, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope, poor quality and out of focus. Categorizing (talk) 07:33, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:46, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope, poor quality and out of focus. Categorizing (talk) 07:35, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:46, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope, poor quality for out of focus. Categorizing (talk) 07:37, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:46, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope, poor quality for out of focus. Categorizing (talk) 07:47, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:46, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope, poor quality and out of scope. Categorizing (talk) 07:52, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:46, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not meet the requirements of COM:SELFIE. B dash (talk) 02:30, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use; active participant. P 1 9 9   13:49, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:Broebes Rosen Thal.jpg Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 07:56, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and redirected. P 1 9 9   13:52, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

redundant, slight variation of File:Banana_bread_slices_on_a_plate,_February_2008.jpg Vort (talk) 08:16, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and redirected. P 1 9 9   13:52, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No EXIF, low resolution, no specific event details in description. This does not look like a self-made image, but seems to be a professional press photo at an official event or a frame from a YouTube video. All previous six uploads from the uploader have been copyvios, and files such as this should be deleted per COM:PRP (unless the uploader can clarify the image's origin). GermanJoe (talk) 09:28, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:54, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

My mistake!! published 9 August!! Plus it is the wrong species name >.< Totodu74 (talk) 09:48, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9   13:54, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Fabian RRRR as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not every image of the cosmos is taken by NASA|1=https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap060206.html http://www.gemini.edu/node/171 http://www.gemini.edu/node/14 . I agree that this is likely problematic. While NASA did publish the image, it appears to be a Gemini work and not a NASA work. Gemini license appears to be Non-Commercial without prior permission. Storkk (talk) 09:52, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, incompatible license. P 1 9 9   13:56, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. It's a flag for a municipality founded in 1952, so copyright violation is probably but I'm not 100% sure. Guanaco (talk) 10:01, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:57, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:12, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Foi um erro no upload. Por isso, deve ser eliminado. Austelino (talk) 12:47, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination, and out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:04, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of an OoS person. E4024 (talk) 19:38, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:57, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No presenta nada Meritorio para estar aqui Danny Gabriel MELGAREJO SILVA (talk) 14:01, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: and redirected. P 1 9 9   14:08, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://i.ytimg.com/vi/9G474lvrvXQ/maxresdefault.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, readily found on the internet using Google Image. P 1 9 9   14:09, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from poster. Should be cropped/blanked to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: the background image is of such low qualtiy to be DM. P 1 9 9   14:11, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I disagree with the license, the logo is above ToO IMO Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:11, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:15, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused and very similar to File:Superhero.png Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:14, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and redirected. P 1 9 9   14:16, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong source author. If in PD for a specific reason, then the relevant infos are needed, as well as the relevant PD tag Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:52, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:18, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lower-resolution duplicate of File:Criccieth - Capel Seion.JPG Ham II (talk) 20:31, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. You can use {{Duplicate}} next time. P 1 9 9   14:19, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lower-resolution duplicate of File:Criccieth - Berea.JPG Ham II (talk) 20:44, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete: I think {{Duplicate}} would have been appropriate here. --bjh21 (talk) 21:52, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. You can use {{Duplicate}} next time. P 1 9 9   14:19, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Se ha corregido el nombre al archivo. Nadie lo ha usado con este nombre. Iavs leroy (talk) 21:31, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: implausible and redundant redirect. P 1 9 9   14:21, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 as no permission (No permission since) Hystrix (talk) 21:32, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The license does not fit the date.Thank you ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 21:39, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand what you're saying. Keep of course. --Magnus (talk) 06:35, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Hystrix and Tsungam: No sense to "{{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}}" license in a 1967 file ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 07:48, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The photo was (presumably) taken in 1967 and published in 2016 under this License. Where is the problem? The uploader can still be 75 years of age. Hystrix (talk) 07:59, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9   14:23, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is there a CC BY SA license for this image which was found from google? Leoboudv (talk) 06:02, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Leoboudv If you check the source you will see that this image is not only on google but also on an official public archive website (wich answers "de facto" to the "CC BY-SA 4.0" conditions). We personally know Guido Marcon (the professional author of the photo) and basically he made it in 1972 for a for a public theater program (Théâtre National de Belgique). Anyway I'll ask directly the permission to the photographer Guido Marcon and I'll send it at "[email protected]" as soon as possible. Could you retire the banner and help us to maintain the photo ? Have a nice day. Musicsystem


Kept: per -Leoboudv. Ruthven (msg) 19:15, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : thumbnail format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:32, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:16, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplication דוג'רית (talk) 18:59, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Photo by David Sun. White washed: File:Hillary Biscay on bike at Challenge Taiwan 2013.jpg.


Deleted: per nomination, dupe. Ruthven (msg) 19:17, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Can be found at https://www.charleslocke.com/south-shore-puzzle-journal . I suspect not own photo, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:35, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 23:26, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a screencap of this timelapse video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TP_J1URM7ZI Likely derivative work of a copyrighted video. Ytoyoda (talk) 04:59, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a screen cap of the time lapse video and predates the youtube video. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeremynabors (talk • contribs) 15:29, 10 January 2016‎ (UTC)[reply]

@Jeremynabors: Does that mean we should keep or delete the image?   — Jeff G. ツ 18:02, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Although there is no US case law on the subject, it is unlikely that a court would find that an unattended video camera could create a copyrightable work -- there would be no author and no creativity. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:57, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Relisting this image - apparently, screen captures of time lapse video are no longer PD: see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Colorado State Stadium panorama 2017-08-18.jpg Ytoyoda (talk) 16:57, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    • @Jameslwoodward: This wasn't just a random security camera. It appears that someone at the University planned, architected, and executed the construction of The Pavilion, someone in the Athletic Department planned and executed the perfectly framed time lapse photography of the construction, someone there posted the result on their website, and Jeremynabors uploaded a single frame of that result here as {{PD-ineligible}}. The second person appears to have allowed the result to stand on the University's website, presented to the world as copyrighted by the University. Such allowance does not automatically put that frame into the Public Domain.   — Jeff G. ツ 22:57, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but I don't buy it. Although, as I said, there is no US case law, all of the experts and the European case law agree that images taken by a fixed, unattended, camera do not have a copyright. All of the planning and orchestration does not change that. Imagine, if you will, a stage play, photographed with an unattended camera. The resulting movie would not have a copyright of its own, although it might be a DW if the play had a copyright. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:26, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Jim. Ruthven (msg) 23:28, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doesn't fit in with the rules of {{PD-PRC-exempt}}. B dash (talk) 04:57, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:37, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doesn't fit in with the rules of {{PD-PRC-exempt}}. B dash (talk) 04:57, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:37, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doesn't fit in with the rules of {{PD-PRC-exempt}}. B dash (talk) 04:58, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:37, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Direct link to image so nominal permission canno be verified , English Wikipedia equivalent non-free w:File:Aparna Ghosh Profile Photo.gif ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 05:26, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: taken from https://biographybd.com, where no free license is indicated. Ruthven (msg) 17:39, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Posted by the person for whom the chromosome image was made, not the creator of the image itself. {{PD-US-Medical imaging}} maybe, but I'm not sure if it applies. Guanaco (talk) 10:08, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: we cannot use PD-US-Medical imaging because we do not know if the photo was taken in the USA; however, if it's his own chromosomes, he hired a doctor or a lab to have it; thus he's the copyright holder. Ruthven (msg) 17:41, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UNclear, where the original image comes from. It's 3-dimensional. This here es a reworked image of an original. But all what's reworked is a fake. The red and violet colors are not ancient. So this fake image is not usable und it's not clear, where it comes from without the fake elements. Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:38, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I found a photo of the original pottery at File:Dionysos thiasos Staatliche Antikensammlungen 2344.jpg. You can see that the leaves and the lionskin are colored in the original. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:34, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination: no source. Ruthven (msg) 17:44, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Mativet

edit

Pictures of a non-notable individual: the corresponding WP fr: article has been deleted. They have no educational use that I can see, plus several of them have permission problems: they are pics *of* François Mativet, not taken by him.

Have been excluded from this mass DR pics that actually had an educational value such as File:Chateau Caen 1966.jpg and pics about rock group Category:Lard Free of which Mativet was a member: the group has a WP article (fr:Lard Free). The Lard Free pics also have permission issues, but the mass request is already big enough as it is. In short, I'm asking only for the deletion of family/private pictures from this user. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 08:45, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:26, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mativet (talk · contribs)

edit

Einige, nicht verwendete private Fotos, hochgeladen 2009 und 2010. Das älteste von 1939 File:Saint Etienne en Coglès 01.jpg kann eventuell per PD-old-70 behalten werden. Als Quelle ist bei vielen "lard free" angegeben. Dieser ist vermutlich identisch mit dem Hochlader, siehe Dateibeschreibung von File:Lard Free Evry 1972a.jpg. Bei anderen Fotos sind als Quellen andre mativet oder family archive angegeben. Genutzt werden folgende Bilder: File:Tour de l'ouest Saint-Malo r passage des coureurs.jpg (Quelle: andre mativet) und File:Rotheneuf 1956 ter.jpg (Quelle: family archive).

Hystrix (talk) 10:17, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Hystrix: (or anyone else) can you provide an explanation in English (or French) ? Some of these photos are used on FR.wikipedia, so they have an educationnal value. --XIIIfromTOKYO (talk) 11:11, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@XIIIfromTOKYO: Danke für Deine Nachfrage. Ich versuche immer, meine muttersprachlichen Beiträge per google translator zu übersetzen. Diesmal funktionierte es nicht, vermutlich die eckigen Klammern. Außerdem habe ich einige meiner Fehler bemerkt. (Thank you for your demand. I always try to translate my native speakers by google translator. This time it did not work, presumably the square brackets. Besides, I've noticed some of my mistakes.) Hystrix (talk) 11:27, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - unclear copyright status - no permission cases - several authors. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:39, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ab-bs as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Uploader hat nicht die erforderlichen Rechte Google translation: "Uploader does not have the necessary rights" Ruthven (msg) 13:58, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Es ist schade, dass hier mehrere Einzweckkonten (Zitronenkuchen, Zitronenquark, Nudelholz99 und Ab-bs) zusammenkommen und jeweils meinen, sie hätten Recht und alle anderen Unrecht. Änderungen und Anfragen solcher Art sollten nur noch auf offiziellem Weg (OTRS oder zumindest verifizierter Account) gemacht werden. --Magnus (talk) 15:06, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ich weiß leider nicht, wie ich das Konto verifizieren kann. Dieser Account läuft über das Sekretariat von Prof. Nina Kolleck, gerne kann das über eine E-Mail an das Sekretariat (Link oben) verifiziert werden. Frau Kolleck hat der Veröffentlichung dieses Fotos nicht zugestimmt, es nie unter CC BY-SA 4.0 veröffentlicht worden. Daher bitte ich erneut darum, es zu löschen. --Ab-bs (talk) 20:56, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment I don't think that such a request is accepteble, because Ab-bs can be anyone (and she's not the photographer, and the photo was taken clearly with the approval of Frau Kolleck). A put down request should be handled by OTRS.
    Deutsch: Schreib eine E-Mail an permissions-commons@wikimedia.org.
    --Ruthven (msg) 17:24, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • As I said (in German), I am working for Prof. Kolleck and the request comes directly from her. The upload was not done with Prof. Kollecks approval. If you want to have proof that the request comes from us write an E-Mail to [email protected] (http://www.ewi-psy.fu-berlin.de/einrichtungen/arbeitsbereiche/bildungsfor_modell_analyse_soz_systeme/index.html) and I will answer you there. If that is not a acceptable request, I don't know what would be.--Ab-bs (talk) 09:13, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: If there is some privacy right issues Nina Kolleck must make the request herself from a verifiable email sent to [email protected]. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:52, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image was uploaded without the consent of the subject. Subject requests deletion on verified e-mail address at OTRS 2017120610006929 Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:39, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   22:29, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope.    FDMS  4    19:08, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt it – font and overall arrangement as well as the lack of the organiser's logo imo make it look much more like fan art.    FDMS  4    20:32, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - it does not seem like the logo has ever looked like this - exemple https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:WWFnomercy1999UK.jpg. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:06, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]