Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/06/21

Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive June 21st, 2015
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader has stated "own work" for other images which were clearly copyrighted images on the web. This image seems to be a cropped and exposure altered version of [1] which is found on multiple other web sites. Claim of own work is dubious. Whpq (talk) 11:01, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Obviously copyvio. Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:00, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by WTM as Fair use (non-free) and the most recent rationale was: logo Maybe the logo does not surpass threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 16:17, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 16:20, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wiki-Edt2000 (talk · contribs)

edit

COM:PENIS

Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:50, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per Com:PENIS Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:00, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gekayjobs (talk · contribs)

edit

Self promotion pictures by a sock master - en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gekay job solutions

Bazj (talk) 14:00, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Gekayjobs (talk · contribs)

These are the only uploads of this user. While we allow a limited number of personal images for an active contributor's user page, both "active" and "contributor" must come first. Commons is not Facebook.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:55, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Soviet/post-Soviet period gravestones with images, plaques with images or bas-reliefs, monuments. No FOP for artwork in Russia.

Juggler2005 (talk) 00:36, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    • Памятник установлен 22 января 1924 года. Автор умер более семидесяти лет назад. Удаление считаю неправомерным. Алексеев Игорь Евгеньевич
      • Игорь Евгеньевич, срок охраны считается от смерти автора, а вы не указали авторов и поэтому не можете подтвердить, что их смерть была давно. Пожалуйста, запишите в каждой фотографии, кто был автором скульптуры и когда он умер. Спасибо. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 21:07, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very unlikely to be own work – historical photographs, movie posters and screenshots with small resolutions. While the subject (MGR) had died in 1987, the uploader claims that most of these photographs were taken in 1997.

Vensatry (Ping me) 16:06, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparent promotional material for commercial film, probable copyvios in the absence of further background information. (Google auto-translation into Tamil: "கமர்ஷியல் படம் வெளிப்படையான விளம்பர பொருள், மேலும் பின்னணி தகவல்கள் இல்லாத நிலையில் சாத்தியமான காப்புரிமை மீறல்.")

See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sivaji Ganesan, Mu.Karunanidhi, M.G.R. et Jayalalithaa.jpg.

(Have just noticed that user has already had significant number of copyvios deleted).

Ubcule (talk) 21:19, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:58, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User's artwork that breach COM:NOTHOST

~AntanO4task (talk) 01:51, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment From what I vaguely remember of my own deletion request above, the now-deleted (copyvio) images were of a famous actor alongside the uploader's own (non-copyvio) renderings of that person. A bit of checking (and confirmation against the filenames above) suggests that the "MGR" in question is M. G. Ramachandran, an Indian actor (famous in Tamil cinema) turned politician.
Of course, while a few of the drawings may be worth keeping if we don't have any better-quality free images of that person (and assuming they aren't blatant derivative copyvios from photos), we probably can't justify keeping them all. Ubcule (talk) 18:28, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:16, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely uploader's own work. See also File:Chip-reid.jpg Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:39, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely uploader's own work. See also File:Img jamshed bharucha.jpg Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:39, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work, no license. There is no information on the copyright status of the incorporated work. Diannaa (talk) 00:42, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very bad resolution, Not useful for the Encyclopedia. Dr-Taher (talk) 05:20, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SANTACH COMPANY (talk · contribs)

edit

Plain commercial advertising, SPAM, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 05:42, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by SANTACH COMPANY (talk · contribs)

Advertisement and Commons:Derivative works from commercial packaging.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tprk05700 (talk · contribs)

edit

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 05:47, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kijamasters (talk · contribs)

edit

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 05:48, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Scabrera 21 (talk · contribs)

edit

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 05:51, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the flickr's description: "Sursa: Chisinau.md", wich is copyrighted » "© 2015 Primăria Municipiului Chişinău Toate drepturile rezervate." Leoboudv (talk) 05:59, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of focus and dull in color Aftab Banoori (Talk) 07:15, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File with this name exists, I have uploaded the same picture with different name Aftab Banoori (Talk) 09:39, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 07:33, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Udaykumar236 (talk · contribs)

edit

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 07:48, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Ukraine (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 1981. Kulmalukko (talk) 07:55, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image. not useful for educational purpose Saqib (talk) 08:04, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep It is a good quality picture, used in many articles about 12 pages use this picture. This picture shouldn't be deleted. Aftab Banoori (Talk) 09:12, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep, there are thousands of such images on the Commons. Just for Pakistan, look under Category:Boys of Pakistan, as well as Category:Girls of Pakistan and Category:Children of Pakistan, and Category:People of Pakistan. And that's just Pakistan. There are such categories everywhere on the Commons, and not just for countries. EChastain (talk) 13:10, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

p.s. And they are educational, from my point of view. I wouldn't know what people from other countries looked like, if it weren't for such images. EChastain (talk) 13:12, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep can't see any reason for deleting. --ProfessorX (talk) 18:12, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INeverCry 00:39, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Ukraine (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 2008. Kulmalukko (talk) 08:04, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image. not useful for educational purpose Saqib (talk) 08:05, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good picture

edit

 Keep It shouldn't be deleted, many celebrities like president Ayub Khan, Muhammad Ali Bogra and M. A. Jinah traveled in it,
The car is antique and at public display. Aftab Banoori (Talk) 09:15, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Although there are different facts to balance:

  • The image is in use by other Wikimedia projects (several Wikipedia articles) and therefore in scope. According to commons:scope, "It should be stressed that Commons does not exist to editorialise on other projects – that an image is in use on a non talk/user page is enough for it to be within scope." If you feel this image should not be used, you should tell the Wikipedias and try to convince local communities to use another one or not to use any image at all.
  • However, the image is not very good and there are better images of the same model - the person in the image doesn't make the image unusable, but it lowers its quality. The use in enwiki was challenged a few months ago and at some point it may stop being used.
  • Although, even if the image stops being used, this particular car might be notable (not just the model, I mean the car itself). In fact, most individual preserved cars of the 1920s might be notable, and if this one has carried notable people and it's in display, we can be quite sure that it is notable. Therefore, we shouldn't delete the image unless we have better equivalent images of this particular car.--Pere prlpz (talk) 15:36, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 00:39, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image. not useful for educational purpose Saqib (talk) 08:05, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good Picture

edit

 Keep It is plastic molded canoe, this image is used in nearly 10 articles.
Aftab Banoori (Talk) 09:17, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INeverCry 00:40, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Ukraine (see FOP in Ukraine). Built in 2001. Kulmalukko (talk) 08:09, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no quite notable, out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 08:13, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no used self promotion, out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 08:14, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Even a film poster would be copyrighted by the film company Leoboudv (talk) 08:17, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, commercial advertising made by http://www.sambaby.com/ -- Christian Ferrer 08:22, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, commercial advertising made by http://www.sambaby.com/ -- Christian Ferrer 08:22, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 08:23, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 08:28, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurry, small, dark... not useful! Edelseider (talk) 08:36, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, but the artist who created the depicted work, is still living, and France regrettably has no freedom-of-panorama exception. So, a permission from the artist is needed or the image needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:53, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, but the artist who created the depicted work, is still living, and France regrettably has no freedom-of-panorama exception. So, a permission from the artist is needed or the image needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:55, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, but the artist who created the depicted work, is still living, and France regrettably has no freedom-of-panorama exception. So, a permission from the artist is needed or the image needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:56, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nəsibli Təhmasib (talk · contribs)

edit

Hardly own work, missing permission and EXIF, low resolution

Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:59, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Plain commercial advertising, SPAM, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 07:11, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Plain commercial advertising, SPAM, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 07:14, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:21, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nəsibli Təhmasib (talk · contribs)

edit

Small size, inconsistent or missing EXIF data. Pictures of old pictures. User with bad history, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 13:24, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:18, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no evidence the YouTube video is freely licenced nor that the named director is even the copyright holder. Ww2censor (talk) 09:00, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, but the artist who created the depicted work, is still living, and France regrettably has no freedom-of-panorama exception. So, a permission from the artist is needed or the image needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:03, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, but the artist who created the depicted work, is still living, and France regrettably has no freedom-of-panorama exception. So, a permission from the artist is needed or the image needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:03, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, but the depicted monument/sculpture is a recent work, thereby still in copyright, and Latvia regrettably has no freedom-of-panorama exception. So, a permission from the artist is needed or the image needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:41, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem with:


Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, but the depicted monument is a recent work, thereby still in copyright, and Russia regrettably has no freedom-of-panorama exception for such works. So, a permission from the artist is needed or the image needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:45, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, but the depicted monument is a recent work, thereby still in copyright, and Russia regrettably has no freedom-of-panorama exception for such works. So, a permission from the artist is needed or the image needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:46, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According COM:FOP#Jordan there is no freedom of panorama in Jordan. The monument was built in 2000, which is far to recent to assume PD-old or similar for the object itself.

JuTa 10:11, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete: Unfortunately this image is still in copyright in France until 2044, so we cannot host it here. As a 1910 painting it is PD in the US so it should be moved to the enwiki per other Picasso images available in US with the "do not move to Commons" tag. Ww2censor (talk) 10:33, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obsolete, very low quality structure Kopiersperre (talk) 10:50, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 11:10, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is possibly a temporarily exhibited object. As far as I know, FoP in Germany is only for permantly exhbited objects in public places Llez (talk) 12:17, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING Ras67 (talk) 12:42, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong licence: While this file may actually be the uploader's own work, he/she has used elements of the (former) official logo of the faculty of political science, Suan Sunanda Rajabhat University, which may still be copyright-restricted, see University's website and the faculty's facebook profile. --RJFF (talk) 15:55, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons does not accept fair use images. This logo should be uploaded locally to English Wikipedia and then deleted here. Michael Barera (talk) 12:43, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING Ras67 (talk) 12:53, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING Ras67 (talk) 12:54, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING Ras67 (talk) 12:55, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING Ras67 (talk) 12:55, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Несвободный файл, http://photos.geni.com/p13/07/98/8a/05/534448393178b079/aal_large.jpg Voyagerim (talk) 12:59, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not used personal image, out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 13:19, 21 June 2015 (UTC)  Keep sorry, I reverse, article and category for this person -- Christian Ferrer 13:29, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INeverCry 00:46, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 13:20, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 13:21, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yfrhhehebf (talk · contribs)

edit

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 13:26, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not used personal image, out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 13:33, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not used personal image, out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 13:34, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 13:35, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion of a no quite notable music group, out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 13:38, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion of a not enough notable musician, out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 13:39, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion of a not enough notable musician, out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 13:40, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Renu11 (talk · contribs)

edit

Self-promotion, advertising.

Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:49, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not used, no articles, rather small, out of scope -- Christian Ferrer 13:56, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work, screenshot of TV? Thibaut120094 (talk) 14:08, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Agukalpa1234 (talk · contribs)

edit

Video clips. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Agukalpa1234 (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. INeverCry 00:50, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Debatosh Nath (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused non-notable logo George Chernilevsky talk 14:37, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, but the sculptor of the depicted fountain died only in 1976 and Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Germany does not cover inside objects. Needs a permission or deletion. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:38, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem with:


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Agcosmos (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rrlitster (talk · contribs)

edit

Unlikely to be own work: could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by E.dudina (talk · contribs)

edit

SPAM, out of project scope promo materials

George Chernilevsky talk 14:43, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mesiahrey (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LUIS BELTRAN ACURIO (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused private photo. Also copyvio George Chernilevsky talk 14:51, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 14:52, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by QueSera4710 (talk · contribs)

edit

out of project scope, unused and not categorized private artwork

George Chernilevsky talk 14:55, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, text only table, could be created as text if needed George Chernilevsky talk 14:56, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SPAM, out of project scope promo George Chernilevsky talk 14:57, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, a promo book George Chernilevsky talk 14:59, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused non-notable screenshot George Chernilevsky talk 15:03, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tsishkovskiy (talk · contribs)

edit

SPAM, out of project scope promo

George Chernilevsky talk 15:04, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image outside our scope. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 15:09, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt the source (author and date), because http://www.lfv-bb.de/index.php?dat=news&id=764 (dated 2006) has a (smaller) copy of that photo with "© Flugplatz Cottbus-Drewitz". 32X (talk) 15:17, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo is obviously not the uploader's own work, and is not among our donated Bundesarchiv images. We don't know the source or copyright status of the photo. Diannaa (talk) 15:25, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Notre2005 (talk · contribs)

edit

"Source=Private archive of the depicted person.
Author= Author unknown; images not published.
Licensing: Fair use: courtesy of the person depicted on the photo, private archive, not published previously, publishing in a Wikipedia article permitted."
Copyright is almost certainly owned by the photographers who cannot have been dead for 70 years. Commons does not permit fair use.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:26, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused private logo George Chernilevsky talk 15:28, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused private logo George Chernilevsky talk 15:30, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 15:30, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Msm.sepehr (talk · contribs)

edit

unused formulas, could be created as text if needed

George Chernilevsky talk 15:34, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 1989 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyrighted barbie doll Yann (talk) 16:08, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cropped from Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mammootty with Sulfath and Jabbar Patel.jpg Vensatry (Ping me) 16:23, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Can you categorize the file correctly? This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 16:28, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Taivo (talk) 16:37, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no quite notable, out of scope, in more maybe a copyrighted image, look bottom right -- Christian Ferrer 17:14, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader claimed in my talkpage, that he took the image from Russian-language encyclopedia "Советская военная энциклопедия / под ред. Н. В. Огаркова. — М.: Воениздат, 1978. — Т. 6. — 678 с. — (в 8-ми томах)", so it is actually not own work. Taivo (talk) 17:18, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Извиняюсь. Наша ошибка. Удалил. Taivo (talk) 12:07, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Отлично!!! Копирастия рулит!!! --Vladlen666 (talk) 02:36, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per {{NoFoP-Japan}} — Racconish 📥 17:21, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per {{NoFoP-Japan}} — Racconish 📥 17:22, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per {{NoFoP-Japan}} — Racconish 📥 17:23, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cover page of her biography Vensatry (Ping me) 17:23, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per {{NoFoP-Japan}} — Racconish 📥 17:24, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per {{NoFoP-Japan}} — Racconish 📥 17:25, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

̽My English is poor, but I'll explain. This is not art works copyrighted. Yamanashi Prefecture of Japan has created public for the purposes of Japan schistosomiasis reminder. The Copyright Act of Japan, notice work the engine of local governments have created, is outside. Please see Copyright Act of Japan the scope of copyright protection.Article 13 - Works not protected of (ii) --Sakaori (talk) 12:34, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation. Nomination withdrawn. — Racconish 📥 12:42, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate your prompt reply.--Sakaori (talk) 13:22, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
And I appreciate your efforts to communicate Clin. — Racconish 📥 13:35, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 00:57, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation. Previous nomination was rejected based on Article 13 of Copyright Act of Japan, but is it really applicable? The law specifies the types of documents that are not protected by copyright: laws, administrative notifications, court decisions, and their translations (made by government themselves). Is there evidence that it covers posters like this? See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tadamasa Kodaira.jpg which cites Article 13. As I understand, illustrative PR materials made by governments are generally covered by Article 32, not by Article 13. Article 32 gives certain freedom for press use, but unfortunately it doesn't give freedom to 公衆送信 ("transmission [via network] to the public"). [2][3] We'd need Yamanashi Prefecture's explicit permission verified using COM:OTRS or wait until the copyright expires. (until 2041 for Japan US copyright, I believe.) whym (talk) 12:49, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I commented in a previous delete deliberation. I do not have the specialized knowledge to.It will follow the decision of a number of user community.--Sakaori (talk) 13:07, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In my understanding, only materials related to exertion of power by organs of the State or local public entities satisfy Copyright Act of Japan, Article 13, (ii). I'm not sure this poster complies it. This seems just a PR material, which is covered by Article 32, (2). By the way, I believe this poster has an enough creativity, so {{PD-ineligible}} is not suitable. --Yapparina (talk) 14:53, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. Natuur12 (talk) 21:33, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per {{NoFoP-Japan}} — Racconish 📥 17:26, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per {{NoFoP-Japan}} — Racconish 📥 17:27, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader said in my talkpage, that he took the map from Russian-language encyclopedia "Советская военная энциклопедия / под ред. Н. В. Огаркова. — М.: Воениздат, 1978. — Т. 6. — 678 с. — (в 8-ми томах)", so it is actually not own work. The file has derivative works file:Вооруженное востание в Петрограде.png and file:1917 armed uprising in Petrograd.svg. Taivo (talk) 17:27, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per {{NoFoP-Japan}} — Racconish 📥 17:28, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted advertisements are being shown. Lazlo 17:37, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

looking at the exif, I think this is not an own work, and certainly copyrighted -- Christian Ferrer 17:39, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • See also :
File:MT201-SOLO-2012.jpg
File:MT101-SOHO-2012.jpg
File:MT202-DUET EXE-2012.jpg
File:MT101E-SOHO EXPRESS-2012.jpg
File:Mt103turbo.jpg
File:Octopus - MT454 (Pair).jpg

-- Christian Ferrer 17:41, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted logo? http://www.mbamutua.org/ or hijacked advertising? https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussioni_utente:Luciano_Dragonetti. Out of scope IMO -- Christian Ferrer 17:49, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

don't seems to be a sigil https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Sigils , without more description it is out of scope IMO -- Christian Ferrer 17:54, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader request The Photographer (talk) 18:12, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SPAM, out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:32, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per {{NoFoP-Japan}} — Racconish 📥 18:33, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused private photo George Chernilevsky talk 18:34, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doubtful licence. Author isn't "unknown" - it is W. Sierociński. I don't know when he lived, but a drawing might be quite modern. On a source page there is information, that it is a card published by PPHU "Apik" Sp. z o.o. (sounds like a modern Polish firm). Definitely it doesn't come from 1918, because these minesweepers were bought by Poland only in 1920. Pibwl (talk) 18:35, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If I am understanding Freedom of panorama#United Kingdom correctly, photos of graphic works such as this are not OK for commons, as they are protected under the freedom of panorama laws in the UK. Diannaa (talk) 18:37, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:38, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bandamex (talk · contribs)

edit

out of project scope, a promo of non-notable music band

George Chernilevsky talk 18:40, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:00, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offense please, but DR started to verify claimed own work, as missing EXIF, imho a visible 'moirée' (scan?) and watermark-ed, Roland zh (talk) 19:29, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Logo of a small student organization that ceased to exist in 2014, according to their website: http://ict-blue.be/ Tom-L (talk) 19:37, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vanity shot used only for now-deleted en.wp user page that was being used as a "profile". Out of project scope, no educational value, unused. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:38, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of a small student organization. The only "use" left is a remnant on Wikidata, the corresponding article has been deleted. Tom-L (talk) 19:38, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of a student organization. The only use left is a remnant on Wikidata, the corresponding article has been deleted. Permission is also unclear, though it might fall under PD-simple. Tom-L (talk) 19:42, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of a student organization. The only use left is a remnant on Wikidata, the corresponding article has been deleted. Permission is also unclear. Tom-L (talk) 19:47, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal/self-promotional image INeverCry 00:46, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 03:40, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:50, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 03:40, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:52, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 03:40, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 00:59, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 03:40, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 01:06, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 03:41, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 01:38, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 03:41, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 01:40, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Derogative name - likely personal offence.--Pere prlpz (talk) 08:47, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom and Pere. Green Giant (talk) 03:42, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 01:41, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Derogative name - likely personal offence. Furthermore, possible copyvio of other elements in the photo.--Pere prlpz (talk) 08:48, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom and Pere. Green Giant (talk) 03:42, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 01:44, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 03:42, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 01:45, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 03:42, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 01:46, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 03:43, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused image of non-notable people INeverCry 01:48, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 03:43, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 01:51, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Out of scope description, and very blurred image, while there are better equivalent images in Commons.--Pere prlpz (talk) 08:50, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom and Pere. Green Giant (talk) 03:43, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 01:54, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 03:43, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 01:55, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 03:43, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pastorbikinn (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of scope - no educational value

INeverCry 01:57, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 03:44, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:03, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 03:44, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:05, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 03:44, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:08, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 03:44, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:09, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 03:45, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lake flaker (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of scope - unused personal/self-promotional images

INeverCry 02:12, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 03:45, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:13, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 03:45, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:18, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 03:45, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Invalid author and copyright tag indicated: the author is someone working for the Government of South Sudan, not the uploader. Stefan4 (talk) 20:16, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

.A logo of a college - together with the "leaf" at the side it cannot be considered too simple to be considered free... There's no place for it in the commons (of course, there's no OTRS release approval) Ldorfman (talk) 20:58, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam of a project and their webpage does not longer exist Ssola (talk) 21:17, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Won't be usefull ever again. Logo of a disappeared, irrelevant project. Ssola (talk) 21:19, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, possibly copyright violation (Tineye has some hits) El Grafo (talk) 21:28, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously not own work, no source, no date, bogus license. May be old enough, but more info needed. Yann (talk) 21:43, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously not own work, no source, no date, bogus license. May be old enough, but more info needed. Yann (talk) 21:44, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously not own work, no source, no date, bogus license. May be old enough, but more info needed. Yann (talk) 21:44, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per {{NoFoP-Japan}} — Racconish 📥 21:47, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Portlannd (talk · contribs)

edit

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions (Facebook), missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Portlannd (serial copyright violator). All files uplöoaded in 06.2015 and are related to en:Novi Sad, a city in Serbia. Living examples:

See also uploader related: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Montage Podgorica02.JPG


Gunnex (talk) 09:22, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. INeverCry 00:24, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porque fue mal subido Pxlcodewiki (talk) 21:50, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per {{NoFoP-Japan}} — Racconish 📥 21:51, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per {{NoFoP-Japan}} — Racconish 📥 21:52, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per {{NoFoP-Japan}} — Racconish 📥 21:53, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. (1981) 図説 日本文化の歴史 12, 小学館 ISBN 978-4096840122 (hardcover), ISBN 978-4093678124 (paperback)

Kept: INeverCry 01:05, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per {{NoFoP-Japan}} — Racconish 📥 21:54, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. (1981) 図説 日本文化の歴史, 12, 小学館 ISBN 978-4-09-684012-2 (hardcover), ISBN 978-4-09-367812-4 (paperback)
@Clusternote: Thanks for looking into this. Nomination withdrawn. — Racconish 📥 11:21, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 01:05, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by FP~commonswiki (talk · contribs)

edit

Obviously not own works, bogus license. May be old enough, but correct information needed.

Yann (talk) 22:16, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. Nikolay Suetin died in 1954, his artworks is not public domain. See similar case Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Alexander Rodchenko

Andrey Korzun (talk) 22:44, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears lifted from a campaign website. Uploader claims own work, but there is no way we can confirm this. Single upload for the account. -- Dual Freq (talk) 23:51, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Logo appears on old campaign website: [4]
  • Same color suit and tie / same photo shoot as campaign website from: [5]
  • Same theme / campaign motto: [6]
  • No OTRS indicating permission from campaign to post on commons as "Own work" --Dual Freq (talk) 00:03, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a copyright violation, as is this user's other image of the same vehicle (File:Fiat Doblò 2015 Facelift.jpg). Appears to be taken from a car dealership website, hence the low quality and lack of metadata. OSX (talkcontributions) 23:52, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:20, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 03:46, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although the image does appear on a website operated by the United States Government, it is not terribly likely that the picture is a work of an employee of said government. The picture is probably taken by a member of IS or a citizen in one of the countries where this person has been, and the copyright rests with that photographer. —Darkwind (talk) 02:43, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Revert the image to the English Wikipedia, so that I can change the license to a non-free fair use license. Someone has transferred it to commons. StanTheMan87 (talk) 18:35, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nom. You'll have to request undeletion on English Wikipedia. Green Giant (talk) 03:47, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Errors in the description of the picture - Fehler in der Beschreibung im Bild Asurnipal (talk) 08:40, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: author request Wvk (talk) 17:05, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope, not educational Rosario Berganza 19:45, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 17:07, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope, personal photo unused Rosario Berganza 20:04, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 17:08, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Crosszone (talk · contribs)

edit

not within scope, COM:ADVERT

Rosario Berganza 20:08, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 17:09, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jubaer.123 (talk · contribs)

edit

not within scope, personal photos unused

Rosario Berganza 20:11, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Wvk (talk) 17:10, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not completed so it should delete. 上島さくら (talk) 11:11, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The image is in use by other Wikimedia projects (a Wikipedia article) and therefore in scope. According to commons:scope, "It should be stressed that Commons does not exist to editorialise on other projects – that an image is in use on a non talk/user page is enough for it to be within scope." If you feel this image should not be used, you should tell the Wikipedias and try to convince local communities to use another one or not to use any image at all.--Pere prlpz (talk) 09:23, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: This image was only in use on a user's talk page, not an article - not in scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:29, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not completed so it should delete. 上島さくら (talk) 11:11, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The image is in use by other Wikimedia projects (a Wikipedia article) and therefore in scope. According to commons:scope, "It should be stressed that Commons does not exist to editorialise on other projects – that an image is in use on a non talk/user page is enough for it to be within scope." If you feel this image should not be used, you should tell the Wikipedias and try to convince local communities to use another one or not to use any image at all.--Pere prlpz (talk) 09:23, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: This image was only in use on a user's talk page, not an article - not in scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:28, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 18:41, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Housekeeping. Image previously deleted by admin INeverCry. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:24, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If I am understanding correctly, there's not freedom of panorama for this type of object in Italy.

Diannaa (talk) 18:47, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Housekeeping. Image previously deleted by admin INeverCry. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:24, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by %USER% as Speedy Image is a photo of a photo - copyright/permission information for the original photo is not provided Yann (talk) 22:03, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:22, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not completed so it should delete. -上島さくら (talk) 08:51, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The image is in use by other Wikimedia projects (a Wikipedia article) and therefore in scope. According to commons:scope, "It should be stressed that Commons does not exist to editorialise on other projects – that an image is in use on a non talk/user page is enough for it to be within scope." If you feel this image should not be used, you should tell the Wikipedias and try to convince local communities to use another one or not to use any image at all.--Pere prlpz (talk) 09:24, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: File in use only on user's talk page. User is uploading diagrams of all stations and requested several be removed as incomplete. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:33, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not completed so it should delete.

-上島さくら (talk) 09:12, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The image is in use by other Wikimedia projects (a Wikipedia article) and therefore in scope. According to commons:scope, "It should be stressed that Commons does not exist to editorialise on other projects – that an image is in use on a non talk/user page is enough for it to be within scope." If you feel this image should not be used, you should tell the Wikipedias and try to convince local communities to use another one or not to use any image at all.--Pere prlpz (talk) 09:24, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: File in use only on user's talk page. User is uploading diagrams of all stations and requested several be removed as incomplete. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:33, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not completed so it should delete.

-上島さくら (talk) 09:12, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The image is in use by other Wikimedia projects (a Wikipedia article) and therefore in scope. According to commons:scope, "It should be stressed that Commons does not exist to editorialise on other projects – that an image is in use on a non talk/user page is enough for it to be within scope." If you feel this image should not be used, you should tell the Wikipedias and try to convince local communities to use another one or not to use any image at all.--Pere prlpz (talk) 09:25, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: File in use only on user's talk page. User is uploading diagrams of all stations and requested several be removed as incomplete. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:33, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not completed so it should delete. 上島さくら (talk) 09:08, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: File in use only on user's talk page. User is uploading diagrams of all stations and requested several be removed as incomplete. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:33, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not completed so it should delete.

-上島さくら (talk) 09:11, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The image is in use by other Wikimedia projects (a Wikipedia article) and therefore in scope. According to commons:scope, "It should be stressed that Commons does not exist to editorialise on other projects – that an image is in use on a non talk/user page is enough for it to be within scope." If you feel this image should not be used, you should tell the Wikipedias and try to convince local communities to use another one or not to use any image at all.--Pere prlpz (talk) 09:25, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: File in use only on user's talk page. User is uploading diagrams of all stations and requested several be removed as incomplete. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:34, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING. Yann (talk) 09:21, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:39, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not completed so it should delete. -上島さくら (talk) 09:23, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: File in use only on user's talk page. User is uploading diagrams of all stations and requested several be removed as incomplete. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:34, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not completed so it should delete.-上島さくら (talk) 09:22, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: File in use only on user's talk page. User is uploading diagrams of all stations and requested several be removed as incomplete. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:34, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not completed so it should delete.-上島さくら (talk) 09:28, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: File in use only on user's talk page. User is uploading diagrams of all stations and requested several be removed as incomplete. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:34, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not completed so it should delete. -上島さくら (talk) 09:29, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: File in use only on user's talk page. User is uploading diagrams of all stations and requested several be removed as incomplete. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:34, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not completed so it should delete. 上島さくら (talk) 09:26, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: File in use only on user's talk page. User is uploading diagrams of all stations and requested several be removed as incomplete. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:34, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not completed so it should delete.

-上島さくら (talk) 09:31, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The image is in use by other Wikimedia projects (a Wikipedia article) and therefore in scope. According to commons:scope, "It should be stressed that Commons does not exist to editorialise on other projects – that an image is in use on a non talk/user page is enough for it to be within scope." If you feel this image should not be used, you should tell the Wikipedias and try to convince local communities to use another one or not to use any image at all.--Pere prlpz (talk) 09:16, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: File in use only on user's talk page. User is uploading diagrams of all stations and requested several be removed as incomplete. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:34, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not completed so it should delete.

-上島さくら (talk) 09:31, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: File in use only on user's talk page. User is uploading diagrams of all stations and requested several be removed as incomplete. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:39, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not completed so it should delete. 上島さくら (talk) 11:11, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: File in use only on user's talk page. User is uploading diagrams of all stations and requested several be removed as incomplete. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:34, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not completed so it should delete. 上島さくら (talk) 11:17, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: File in use only on user's talk page. User is uploading diagrams of all stations and requested several be removed as incomplete. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:34, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not completed so it should delete. 上島さくら (talk) 11:17, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: File in use only on user's talk page. User is uploading diagrams of all stations and requested several be removed as incomplete. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:34, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not completed so it should delete. 上島さくら (talk) 11:18, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: File in use only on user's talk page. User is uploading diagrams of all stations and requested several be removed as incomplete. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:34, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not completed so it should delete. 上島さくら (talk) 11:18, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: File in use only on user's talk page. User is uploading diagrams of all stations and requested several be removed as incomplete. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:34, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not completed so it should delete. 上島さくら (talk) 11:18, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: File in use only on user's talk page. User is uploading diagrams of all stations and requested several be removed as incomplete. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:34, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not completed so it should delete. 上島さくら (talk) 11:19, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: File in use only on user's talk page. User is uploading diagrams of all stations and requested several be removed as incomplete. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:34, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not completed so it should delete. 上島さくら (talk) 11:19, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: File in use only on user's talk page. User is uploading diagrams of all stations and requested several be removed as incomplete. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:34, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not completed so it should delete. 上島さくら (talk) 11:19, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: File in use only on user's talk page. User is uploading diagrams of all stations and requested several be removed as incomplete. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:35, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not completed so it should delete. 上島さくら (talk) 11:19, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: File in use only on user's talk page. User is uploading diagrams of all stations and requested several be removed as incomplete. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:35, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not completed so it should delete. 上島さくら (talk) 11:20, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: File in use only on user's talk page. User is uploading diagrams of all stations and requested several be removed as incomplete. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:35, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not completed so it should delete. 上島さくら (talk) 11:20, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: File in use only on user's talk page. User is uploading diagrams of all stations and requested several be removed as incomplete. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:35, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not completed so it should delete. 上島さくら (talk) 11:21, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: File in use only on user's talk page. User is uploading diagrams of all stations and requested several be removed as incomplete. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:35, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not completed so it should delete. 上島さくら (talk) 11:21, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: File in use only on user's talk page. User is uploading diagrams of all stations and requested several be removed as incomplete. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:35, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

すでに新しいバージョンの画像をアップロードしているため 上島さくら (talk) 11:21, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: File in use only on user's talk page. User is uploading diagrams of all stations and requested several be removed as incomplete. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:35, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not completed so it should delete. 上島さくら (talk) 11:22, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: File in use only on user's talk page. User is uploading diagrams of all stations and requested several be removed as incomplete. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:35, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not completed so it should delete. 上島さくら (talk) 11:22, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: File in use only on user's talk page. User is uploading diagrams of all stations and requested several be removed as incomplete. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:34, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not completed so it should delete. 上島さくら (talk) 11:22, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: File in use only on user's talk page. User is uploading diagrams of all stations and requested several be removed as incomplete. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:34, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not completed so it should delete. 上島さくら (talk) 11:23, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: File in use only on user's talk page. User is uploading diagrams of all stations and requested several be removed as incomplete. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:34, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not completed so it should delete.Also, this name is not perfect. 上島さくら (talk) 11:24, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: File in use only on user's talk page. User is uploading diagrams of all stations and requested several be removed as incomplete. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:34, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not completed so it should delete. 上島さくら (talk) 11:25, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: File in use only on user's talk page. User is uploading diagrams of all stations and requested several be removed as incomplete. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:36, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not completed so it should delete. 上島さくら (talk) 11:25, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: File in use only on user's talk page. User is uploading diagrams of all stations and requested several be removed as incomplete. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:36, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not completed so it should delete. 上島さくら (talk) 11:25, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: File in use only on user's talk page. User is uploading diagrams of all stations and requested several be removed as incomplete. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:36, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not completed so it should delete. 上島さくら (talk) 11:25, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: File in use only on user's talk page. User is uploading diagrams of all stations and requested several be removed as incomplete. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:36, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not completed so it should delete. Also this name is not good. 上島さくら (talk) 11:26, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: File in use only on user's talk page. User is uploading diagrams of all stations and requested several be removed as incomplete. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:35, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not completed so it should delete. 上島さくら (talk) 11:27, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: File in use only on user's talk page. User is uploading diagrams of all stations and requested several be removed as incomplete. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:35, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not completed so it should delete. 上島さくら (talk) 11:28, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: File in use only on user's talk page. User is uploading diagrams of all stations and requested several be removed as incomplete. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:35, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not Magerøya. Place shown unknown to me. Plassekongen (talk) 09:22, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, No deletion rationale given. Try to fix wrong content or insert {{Fact disputed}}.Wdwd (talk) 19:12, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nach Beratung in der deutschen Wikipedia:
Roder verstarb 1959, er ist noch nicht 70 Jahre tot. Eine Abbildung der von Roder begonnenen Plastik eines weiblichen Aktes in der Bildmitte ist mithin urheberrechtlich geschützt, die Herkunft der anderen Plastiken in dem Atelier ist überdies auch nicht geklärt. Goesseln (talk) 15:22, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Per nomination.--Wdwd (talk) 19:35, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo - already imported on French Wikipedia Habertix (talk) 16:49, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, Textlogo.--Wdwd (talk) 19:50, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EditPatrol (talk · contribs)

edit

Low quality private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 07:54, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EditPatrol (talk · contribs)

edit

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. INeverCry 00:38, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be original work, not real official logo. JPLeonard (talk) 05:16, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The logo is in use by other Wikimedia projects (several Wikipedia articles) and therefore in scope. According to commons:scope, "It should be stressed that Commons does not exist to editorialise on other projects – that an image is in use on a non talk/user page is enough for it to be within scope." If you feel this logo should not be used, you should tell the Wikipedias and try to convince local communities to use another one or not to use any logo at all. After stop being in use, you can request again deletion from Commons. Furthermore, please note that such self-made logos are often used in Wikipedias when official logos can't be used due to copyright concerns.--Pere prlpz (talk) 09:01, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as above. In use. Yann (talk) 14:09, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of possibly copyrighted content (poster) A.Savin 09:34, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

the whole scene
 Comment Similar topics 1, 2, 3; discussed here --sasha (krassotkin) 12:26, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Half of image is poster with drawings that may be copyright protected (pass originality test). You read: COM:DW. --A.Savin 00:15, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Copyleft may also mean CC-BY-NC (not allowed on Commons), and where is the evidence that the affected posters are copyleft at all? You have to ask their authors (painters), not the political party they belong to. --A.Savin 10:30, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • They painted the logo and link to the site on each poster for decoration only? :) They painted posters, came to the rally, and posed for me not for I photographed and freely distributed including commercial media? "You have to ask their authors" - You are asking me to find one of the thousands of protesters in the city with population more than ten million? Really? Commons:Do not disrupt Commons to illustrate a point, please. --sasha (krassotkin) 09:24, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You still failed to show, where is a free license (e.g. CC-BY-SA 3.0) for uploading this poster on Commons. This is the only thing that counts here. --A.Savin 10:13, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • No need to say so unambiguously. Maybe you're right, but perhaps it's only you think so and your assumptions are wrong. I offer to listen to others. --sasha (krassotkin) 10:40, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ticket:2015062910011305 for posters --Максим Підліснюк (talk) 12:42, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@A.Savin: I have done the impossible - did everything as you wanted. :-) I found the copyright holders for posters and received permissions. The requests must be closed:  Keep. --sasha (krassotkin) 12:57, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK. --A.Savin 21:22, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 14:10, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of possibly copyrighted content (poster) A.Savin 09:35, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Similar topics 1, 2, 3; discussed there --sasha (krassotkin) 12:26, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rally for science and education (Moscow; 2015-06-06) 041.JPG. Yann (talk) 14:11, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of possibly copyrighted content (poster) A.Savin 09:35, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Similar topics 1, 2, 3; discussed there --sasha (krassotkin) 12:26, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rally for science and education (Moscow; 2015-06-06) 041.JPG. Yann (talk) 14:12, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Forgot to check Danish copyright duration, its 70 pma (Nielsen died in 1957). Brandmeister (talk) 11:16, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:13, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation (tv screenshot) Primaler (talk) 11:24, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:13, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplikat von Carn Brea Castle gesamt.jpg Werudolf (talk) 13:34, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 14:14, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

how could to move to wiki-text ??? we don't have aramic-pahlavi alphabet --A.berjis (talk) 15:20, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 14:14, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private corporation Nehir strawberry (talk) 16:16, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Nehir strawberry: What is the reason to delete? The fact the subject owns or leads a corporation might be a reason to keep, not to delete.--Pere prlpz (talk) 11:54, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 14:17, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Der Person im Bild möchte die Bilder geslöscht haben. Nehir strawberry (talk) 15:46, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:02, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader said in my talkpage, that he took the image from Russian-language book "Растительный мир Земли, в 2 томах, М. Мир 1982", so it is actually not own work. Taivo (talk) 17:03, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 14:19, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If I am understanding Freedom of panorama#United Kingdom correctly, these signs are not permitted under the freedom of panorama laws in the UK. Diannaa (talk) 18:35, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how a road sign consisting of simple text can be copyrighted. Rcbutcher (talk) 23:22, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 14:32, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Keep This file was deleted on the grounds of 'copyright violation' and undeleted after request (see discussion here). IMHO, the flower-like shape at the image top is a combination of simple shapes and therefore below the TOO. However, other members of the community may think otherwise. Discasto talk 21:46, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 14:34, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by WTM as Fair use (Non-free) and the most recent rationale was: logo Maybe the logo does not surpass threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 16:19, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no license at all. JuTa 20:13, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It isn't a great photo, but - if it has been well identified - it's the only image on commons of fr:Erythrolamprus viridis (or Liophis viridis). Snakes are clearly in scope.--Pere prlpz (talk) 09:35, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Ok we can keep it at least until we get a better photo of that species. 99of9 (talk) 05:26, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According COM:FOP#Laos there is no freedom of panorama in Laos. How ol is this atwork? JuTa 10:25, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Wat Si Saket was built in 1818, artwork probably around the time as well. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 10:33, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not completed so it should delete. 上島さくら (talk) 11:11, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per uploader Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 10:34, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Recht am eigenen Bild von Jan-Peter Frahm liegt nicht vor. Personenfotos dürfen nur mit Zustimmung es abgebildeten hochgeladen werden. {{No permission since}} (no/missing permission, Recht am eigenen Bild verletzt, 2015-06-15) 188.109.145.19 16:07, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No violation. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 10:56, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The picture has been uploaded without portrait rights after he passed away. Before he died, Jan-Peter did not give the permission for this picture. The picture has been proposed for deletion but was kept with the following argument (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Jan-peter-frahm.jpg): "Zur Erklaerung: Das Bild wurde von Flechtenmikroskopie 2014 aufgenommen. Es liegt nahe, dass dieses Bild a) auf oeffentlichem Grund und b) mit Einverstaendnis gemacht wurde. Prof. Frahm sieht nicht ueberrascht aus, sondern als wenn er absichtlich hat fotografieren lassen. Augenscheinlich sind Prof. Frahm und der Fotograf zumindest entfernt bekannt, Einverstaendnis offenbar gegeben." When I translate the important part into English, it says that "it seems that the permission has been given" and that "he did not look surprised as if he wanted to be photographed". But - as explained above, this is not the case. Furthermore, a person that would like to be photographed, would look into the camera and not into another direction with a 'grumpy' expression. In addition, this picture is not the whole photograph but an extract from a photo showing much more than Jan-Peter Frahm itself. Also if the argument of permission / portrait rights is not valid in some countries outside Germany, there are more reasons for deleting this picture: This picture shows the person with a rather 'grumpy' expression. One would certainly choose another picture for upload. Besides, persons that knew Jan-Peter Frahm also know that he did not like to be photographed during his life. So I would like to ask to respect his wish also after he passed away. If someone insists on uploading a picture from Jan-Peter, a much more appropriate picture could be found. So I would like to ask to delete this picture. Thank you very much in advance. 2001:638:505:102:0:0:0:90 06:47, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The original photographer should comment this. I've notified him. --Túrelio (talk) 07:25, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Das Foto entstand bei einer Exkursion 2013 in Nitztal, Rheinland-Pfalz. Wir hatten uns hin gesetzt und was gegessen, dabei hatten wir gesprochen. Auf dem Bild sind ursprünglich noch zwei weitere Personen. Ich hatte nur den Ausschnitt heraus genommen. Es war eine Runde Diskussion wenn man so möchte. Es gibt sogar ein Gruppen Foto, wo wir nur zu Weit weg stehen, da hat er auch dabei gestanden. --Flechtenmikroskopie (talk) 07:57, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nachtrag, ich weis das der Sohn das Bild nicht sehr Vorteilhaft findet und möchte es gerne gelöscht haben. Ich habe nichts dagegen und würde vielelicht der Bitte nach kommen. --Flechtenmikroskopie (talk) 08:04, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Flechtenmikroskopie, hast du ihm denn damals (oder später) gesagt, dass du das Foto gern veröffentlichen bzw. für die Wikipedia verwenden würdest? Falls ja, wie hat er reagiert? Falls nein, siehst du eine Chance vom erwähnten Sohn ein "besseres" Foto zu erhalten? --Túrelio (talk) 09:13, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ob ich Jan-Peter gefragt hatte oder nicht, kann ich heute echt nicht mehr sagen. Sein Sohn hatte mich mal angerufen, aber leider habe ich keine Daten. --Flechtenmikroskopie (talk) 10:56, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
O.k., wenn das so ist, haben wir auf Basis der de-Rechtsprechung zum Recht am eigenen Bild keine Wahl, sondern müssen löschen, zumal das Foto nur auf :de gebraucht würde.  Delete --Túrelio (talk) 14:47, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion --Krd 16:11, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porque es mi cara y no quiero que aparezca en Google, gracias saludos Felippewilkinson (talk) 16:46, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: probably out of scope anyway. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 10:57, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader said in my talkpage, that he took the image from book "Allan B. Cobb, Animal Sciences (Vol.2 Cret-Hab) - Gale (2002)(0-02-865558-3)(PDF) English", so it is actually not own work. Taivo (talk) 16:54, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • rus: это не точно, но я уверен что не придавал значения авторскому праву когда делал рисунок. И использовал книгу скаченную с пиратского сайта --Vladlen666 (talk) 17:11, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • eng: it is not exactly, but I'm sure that did not attach importance of copyright when he made the drawing. And I use a book downloaded from a pirate site --Vladlen666 (talk) 17:11, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 10:58, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader said in my talkpage, that he took the image from Russian-language book "Бей-Биенко Г.Я. Общая энтомология. Учебник для университетов и сельхозвузов. 3-е изд., доп. Москва: Высшая школа, 1980. 416 с", so this is actually not own work. Taivo (talk) 16:58, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio per Vladlen666 Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 11:00, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Special:Diff/163352494: @Stefan4: It says 'Content is available under Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike.' Does this also apply to images or only to text? There is no MediaWiki:Uploadtext on the wiki. Lazlo 17:01, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • The problem is that licensing statements in footers on many Mediawiki wikis only apply to text but not to images, and we don't know whether the statement on this wiki applies to images or only to text. When you make an edit on a Wikimedia wiki, you have to agree to MediaWiki:Wikimedia-copyrightwarning which is shown on the edit page, and content is licensed thanks to this message. When you upload a file to a wiki, you see the message MediaWiki:Uploadtext, which could be used for the same purpose (i.e. for presenting a licensing agreement to which you have to agree), but there is no such message on the wiki that the picture comes from, so the uploader might not have agreed to any licensing of the picture.
Also note that we only have a thumbnail of the picture. A full-size copy should be uploaded if the file is kept. --Stefan4 (talk) 18:00, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: http://web.archive.org/web/20110623190704/http://fortwiki.com/Fort_Wiki No indication of CC license around the upload date. Com:PCP Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 11:06, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader said in my talkpage, that he took the map from Russian-language encyclopedia "Советская военная энциклопедия / под ред. Н. В. Огаркова. — М.: Воениздат, 1978. — Т. 6. — 678 с. — (в 8-ми томах)", so this is actually not own work. The file has DW (translation into English) file:Patriotic War of 1812 ENG map1.svg. Taivo (talk) 17:06, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That is not an exact copy of the original map, the uploader just used it as an information source. You could see the original map here. -- АлександрЛаптев (talk) 07:39, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Taivo Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 11:14, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader said in my talkpage, that he took the map from Russian-language encyclopedia "Советская военная энциклопедия / под ред. Н. В. Огаркова. — М.: Воениздат, 1978. — Т. 6. — 678 с. — (в 8-ми томах)", so it is actually not own work. The file has DW (translation into English) file:Patriotic War of 1812 ENG map2.svg. Taivo (talk) 17:10, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That is not an exact copy of the original map, the uploader just used it as an information source. You could see the original map here. -- АлександрЛаптев (talk) 07:39, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Taivo Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 11:15, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama for architectural works in France. Diannaa (talk) 18:38, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


It's hard to say what the uploader's intended subject was, but usages of the file give a hint as to the intended subject matter. They created the article about the shopping centre, which is one of three locations where they placed the image on en.wiki. The image is okay for en.wiki, but not for Commons. -- Diannaa (talk) 00:31, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Cropped, the street car is the main focus now. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 11:17, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof is presented that this photograph was published 70 years ago. Consequently, we do not know whether this was indeed published that early or whether the publication was done anonymously. {{Anonymous-EU}} must not be used without such a proof. AFBorchert (talk) 21:36, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1 Basically the same situation as with the photo of Anne Frank that has been deleted a month ago. // Martin K. (talk) 10:39, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
La photographie a été prise en 1938 par un auteur inconnu. Friedrich Pfeffer est mort en 1944. La licence {{anonymous-EU}} est peut-être mal choisie et peut-être {{PD-old}} aurait été plus pertinente mais il est indubitable que cette photographie ancienne EST désormais du domaine public. Je connais les débats quant au dossier Anne Frank au regard du domaine public mais ceci n'a rien à voir. --Madelgarius (talk) 18:25, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Madelgarius: Sorry, but you are wrong. It is not even likely, that this image might be in the public domain:
  • If one thing is for shure, than that Fritz Pfeffer himself is not the photographer – therefore the date of his death is irrelevant .
  • The author is stated to be unknown. But beside the fact, that there was no real research on that, there is a differnce between Orphan works and Anonymous works.
  • {{Anonymous-EU}} states that a photo has been published without an attributed author more than 70 years ago. Since we do not have any information on a publication using this photo prior 1945, we can not validate that.
  • If we can not proof an anonymous publication, we need informations about the author, because the image is only public domain when he or she died not later than Dez. the 31st 1945. This is a really short timespan of just 7 years after this photo was taken - even considering the war.
In short: We don't have any evidence that this image already is in the public domain. // Martin K. (talk) 19:30, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ne te focalises pas sur anonymous-EU, je te parle également de pd-old, tu ne relèves pas. Enfin, l'absence de preuve n'est pas une preuve de l'absence. De bonne foi, j'ai cherché un auteur pour cette photographie et n'en ai pas trouvé. Tu vas trop loin lorsque tu souhaites obtenir une "preuve" que l'auteur ne peut pas être identifié. --Madelgarius (talk) 05:39, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Madelgarius: Sorry, but it is the other way around: Please have a look at the Precautionary principle. We can not assume that an image may be out of copyright if we do not have any evidence supporting that conclusion.
There is even less evidence for {{PD-old}} because we do not know the author. And it is the death date of the author (not the one of the person displayed) that is the base for calculating the copyright expiration date. In this case this leaves a time frame of just 7 years for the photographer to die after shooting this picture. This is a very short time span and therefore very unlikely. The image of Anne Frank e.g. was produced in about the same year but its author (Otto Frank lived till 1980, so that this photo is in copyright till 2050! // Martin K. (talk) 21:36, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Non: voir ici et l'article 7 de la convention de Berne --Madelgarius (talk) 07:48, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Madelgarius: Sorry, but neither the Berne Convention nor your diagram (on what ever national law and date it maybe based) contradicts what I've written above:
  1. Even the best possible path in that diagramm ends in: "Copyright expires 70 years after creation or 70 years after the work was made available to the public if within 70 years of creation" So, since this work obviously has been published decades ago, we need to know the date of its first publication.
  2. The Berne Convention is not the law itself but a multinational treaty that provides a framework that needed to bei implement into national laws. Most countries implemented the length of copyright not to just 50 but to 70 years Post mortem auctoris. And so did Germany, the Nederlands and the USA – the nations whose law maybe relevant for this photo according to the Commons Principles.
So, once again: We either need the name of the photographer (and his death date) or the date when this image has been published for the first time. Since this image is just 77 years old, this is the only way to verify that this image is already in the public domain. // Martin K. (talk) 18:14, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The diagram says 70 years after creation or... (and not and) your translation is a bit partial i'm afraid. I don't need the fifty years of the Berne convention, 70 are sufficient to state that this picture is now in the public domain. --Madelgarius (talk) 08:47, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Besides this diagramm seems to illustrate the situation in the UK (which is not relevant here) and obviously is an archive version, that is no longer distributed museumscopyright.org.uk, you are missinterpreting it:
  • If the first requirement (70 years after the creation) was ment to be sufficent alone, the second requirement (70 years after the publication) would be totally useless, because the date of publication is always after the date of creation. Therefore the only reasonable interpretation of this box is, that the second requirement applies, when the work has been published before, and the first one, when it hasn't.
Anyway, this private.pdf is neither the law itself (cf. copyright lengths) nor a commons guideline. And according to our guidelines we either need the death date of the author or the date of publication here and there. No further discussion needed. // Martin K. (talk) 10:23, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This picture was taken around 1938. It's the same serie that the one picturing Fritz and his 11 years old son. It was probably taken by a professional photographer (photographic background) in Germany. Despite my researches I m'not able to determine who he was. As far as we know, this "simply picture" was made by an unknown photographer. Friedrich Pfeffer died in december 1944, which means life 70 years now: public domain. I only agree with you on one point: no further discussion needed on this issue (which is a bit short in a disagreement). --Madelgarius (talk) 13:19, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry but you still don't get it: Copyright expires 70 years after the authors death. And since Friedrich Pfeffer obviously is not the photographer of this photo, the date of his death is completely irrelevant for the copyright length of this photo. ->  Delete // Martin K. (talk) 17:34, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
So do you. The photographer is unknown (but if you know things I do not you're welcome), so we are with an unattributed picture of somebody died in december 1944: public domain... --Madelgarius (talk) 18:10, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Unknown author, unknown publishing date. 70 year life can't be determined. First publishing date unknown. Public Domain can't be established without more information. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 11:31, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe never in the pd, so... sad end for this. Thinking about stopping my contributions here...--Madelgarius (talk) 15:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Madelgarius: You would not run into problems like this, if you stop looking for portraits of persons who died 70 years ago (The death date of the person displayed is irrelvant for the copyright status). Just focus onto images that are clearly in the public domain (because they are more than 150 years old or do have an know author or publication date) and every thing will be fine ;) // Martin K. (talk) 16:44, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I always underestimate the silly power of white knights --Madelgarius (talk) 18:08, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dont need it again 190.197.20.99 23:49, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Amitie 10g Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 11:33, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, but Jordania has no freedom-of-panorama exception. It needs to be discussed whether the depicted building would be considered copyrighted by its architect in Jordania. If yes, who is the architect? -- Túrelio (talk) 08:52, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:18, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of copyrighted non-free work. --G.dallorto 12:54, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

the car? the house? the lizenz plate of the car? the women?  Keep (Freedom of panorama) --Atamari 15:15, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Obviously the billboard. Women and cars, thanks to god, may not be copyrighted. Yet.  Delete --G.dallorto 19:50, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep not derivative, incidental inclusion. Maybe rename to "Street_in_Gambia.jpg". Lupo 08:27, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Mmhhh... the inclusion is not incidental at all, as the title shows it was the billboard that the photographer wanted to reproduce. But on the other hand I doubt this "poster" might meet the "threshold of originality" criterion, so perhaps this picture might stay after all... --G.dallorto 15:26, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep unless there is any evidence that this is a copyright infringement. Billboard visible is not of commercial business, corporate product, nor a creative original design.-- Infrogmation 22:40, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

kept (the billboard looks like being permanently installed) --ALE! ¿…? 08:30, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According COM:FOP#Gambia there is no freedom of panorama in Gambia. JuTa 10:16, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

While formally correct, there is hardly anything copyrightable visible in this image. The only copyrightable item, the "portrait" on the billboard/banner, is hardly visible.  Keep --Túrelio (talk) 15:32, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per User:Turelio. P 1 9 9   16:08, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. Nesterov works in the public domain since 2017. Under Russian law, the copyright is protected for 70 years after the author's death. The period increases by 4 years for those who worked during the Great Patriotic War 1941-1945. Nesterov died in 1942. See Russian Civil Code, Article 1281.

Andrey Korzun (talk) 09:13, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. The Russia law is formulated extremely vaguely, and it is not really defined what does it mean "worked", for example was Nesterov state employed or just created smth or was just alive. Any practical application of the law will require a legal process, and there is no way for this legal process to end up before 1.1.17, when all works of Nesterov become public domain even if the four years are taken into account.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:23, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Firstly, I asked a question in Russian forum Commons:Форум#Срок действия исключительных прав на произведение в России. Why are you said nothing? Secondly, Russian law unambiguous. Nobody could lead particularly interpretation of the law. Thirdly, I remind you that participants of the Great Patriotic War and workers of that time in Russia use social benefits. Fourth, I want to draw your attention to the experience and practice of Wikisource. This is akin to the project, where the same relation to the copyright and licensing policy. See Russian Wikisource, Arkady Gaydar. He died in 1941. And his work is in Wikisource not public domain. Is installed special template with a warning. See Aleksey Nikolaevich Tolstoy, he died 1945. Written that it works in the public domain since 2020. See Yury Tynyanov, he died 1943. Written that it works in the public domain since 2018. That is always counted 74 years, not 70. Why the Wikimedia Commons should be any different? --Andrey Korzun (talk) 16:39, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
We do not follow practices of the Russian Wikisource. Your other arguments are not valid. Nesterov certainly did not get any benefits, I am not even sure he was even a state employee, and the law is ambiguous. In fact, most of the laws adopted recently in Russia are ambiguous and some of them have been taken to the Constitutional Court for clarification. There are many sources stating this fact.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:15, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I do not understand what is the relationship with the employees? Where did you read? In the law it is not. Laws can be ambiguous, but you must prove that the law is treated differently in relation to this case. The burden of proof on you. So far arguments are not valid. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 22:01, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well, as I understand the law their "rabotal vo vremya Otechestvennoy Voyny" (worked during the Great Patriotic War) means had an official job (that in a socialist state can either be a state employee (an employee of a state-owned enterprise) or a kolkhoz worker. From the point of the state 80-years old Nesterov was neither, he was an old-age-pensioner retiree. What he privately worked on some painting cannot be considered as a job for the purpose of this amendment to the copyright law. Alex Bakharev (talk) 06:23, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I think this interpretation of the law is very unusual. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 06:59, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This is to be decided by the court.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:48, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
And while there is no resolution of the court files should be deleted. I understand you correctly? --Andrey Korzun (talk) 07:57, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No, quite the opposite. We should keep it until the court decides that your interpretation of the law applies. Since there is a zero chance that such decision can be taken before 2017, we can just keep it and forget about the clause.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:54, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Your attitude apparently contradicts the principle Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle. However, I take off questions about copyright violation in accordance with the argument of Dmitry Ivanov. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 09:11, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No, not really. For example, WMF advised us to keep URAA files until a takedown request has been filed. (Just in case you want to nominate more artists who dies between 1942 and 1944).--Ymblanter (talk) 09:26, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Do not know — what is URAA files? --Andrey Korzun (talk) 09:35, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
URAA is this, however, I do not see a direct reference to the recommendation of the WMF legal at that page. It is possible in onr of the discussions this page sites.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:27, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Mikhail Nesterov certainly did not participate in the Great Patriotic War and highly unlikely was a state employee - he was 80 years old then. His works are in public domain since 2013 Alex Bakharev (talk) 21:18, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
In the law is no logical link with the state employees. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 22:01, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as per COM:PRP, "let the courts decide" is not a keep reason. Just ask for undelete after a year-and-a-half. P 1 9 9   16:22, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted, now PD - Jcb (talk) 01:57, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 1989 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright © Electroneurobiología, June 1995 on first page http://electroneubio.secyt.gov.ar/Vida_y_obra_de_Christofredo_Jakob.pdf May be old enough. Yann (talk) 22:08, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See also File:Christfried Jakob 1928 Hosp Borda.jpg. Yann (talk) 22:11, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: taken from website. Uploader needs to provide more evidence of its copyright status, like checking date and original photographer of the image. P 1 9 9   16:16, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

アップロード者が正しく権利を所有しているかどうか不明なため。オリジナルの、http://totsuka-tec.com/052kenguid/0413flasyu.gif は「フリー」とうたってはいるもののライセンスが Wikimedia の受け入れるライセンスであるかどうか不明であるため。 Licsak (talk) 14:37, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No indication of free license or own work on this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:54, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]