Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/03/11
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
Out of scope: plain text file. Biographies should be integrated with relevant wiki articles if they are on notable subjects. Basvb (talk) 18:54, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 09:19, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deleted because just two weeks ago the same version has been deleted after a deletion request. Basvb (talk) 12:35, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
No permission mentioned. copyright note (Google) within the pictureKarsten11 19:52, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
deleted, --Polarlys 11:37, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Shaddadid.gif
jghujhu7hgu8myuntg78tujutgjkuutgnuu7tgjuu 2001:1388:3681:1330:2158:4297:5EDA:88C3 20:20, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Speedy kept: Vandalical DR of a legitime User page. --Amitie 10g (talk) 02:14, 12 March 2015 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
Unused duplicate of File:Mczuba_Cambodia.jpg Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:11, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 19:11, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Payatas101 (talk · contribs)
editImages are appended to a vanity article and appear to have been uploaded for promotional purposes, out of COM:SCOPE, with the webpage and etc. possible COM:COPYVIOs as well.
- File:Fancyber-windows-2015.png
- File:Fancyber-desktop-2015.PNG
- File:Fancyber-logo-2015.png
- File:Esbc.PNG
- File:Esb.PNG
- File:Fancyber-official-logo-2.png
- File:Fancyber-march-15.png
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:51, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 19:12, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Image from imdb. Looks like not "own work" -> http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1924735/ Cap1000 (talk) 22:29, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 18:53, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Eastern en:Turkic Khaganate wasn't too large. Check File:East-Hem 600ad.jpg and File:East-Hem 700ad.jpg and read en:Talk:Turkic Khaganate (section "Map"). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gecary (talk • contribs) 2015-03-07T05:16:16 (UTC)
- What is the deletion rationale? --Stefan4 (talk) 16:15, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: DR by Tirgil34 sock Denniss (talk) 19:36, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
See en:List of largest empires. There is no such called en:Yenisei Kirghiz empire. Discussion in Russian language: ru:Обсуждение:Кыргызский каганат
Kept: Denniss (talk) 19:37, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
it is not the property of the person who posted the photo - PLEASE DELETE PIC 66.66.116.80 01:55, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: by User:Denniss. JuTa 08:48, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
error. Rahulazm (talk) 12:47, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
mistake. Rahulazm (talk) 12:01, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:52, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
no es trabajo propio 186.135.133.12 06:03, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Si es trabajo propio porque yo saque esa foto cuando murió nada mas que la corregí para que no se notara nada más Mirko García Velez (talk) 17:27, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Not own work, this image is copyvio from a lot pages, it is from Google images. This user dont understand Wikimedia Commons, only upload images from Google whitout license. --186.135.133.12 20:36, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- No porque no tomaste la foto vos, ni nadie te autorizó a que la uses. No hace falta mentir porque es fácil desestimarte. Si querés subir una imagen a Commons las sacas vos, las creas, o bien, la tomas de sitios que autorizan a usarlas o que el autor te autorice. En Commons nadie es boludo, hay miles de herramientas que comprueban que la imagen no es tuya, que la tomaste de cualquier lado, aunque la edites y hagas cualquier cosa. --186.135.133.12 20:36, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:13, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Twitter bird is copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 19:15, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:19, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
This logo is on Commons in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 19:16, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:18, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
This logo is on Commons in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 19:16, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:18, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Too tiny for any realistic use. Fry1989 eh? 19:16, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:18, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Blurry selfie not used on any Wiki's Reguyla (talk) 19:41, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:17, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Blurry personal selfie not used on any Wiki's Reguyla (talk) 19:45, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:17, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of source. Personal image of a christmas tree not used on any wiki's. Reguyla (talk) 20:00, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:16, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of source. Blurry personal image not used on any wiki's. Reguyla (talk) 20:11, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:15, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of source. Unused personal image apparently uploaded by individual. Reguyla (talk) 20:14, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:15, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
File:Mundial de Atletismo Master Porto Alegre Brasil 2013.jpg and all images uploaded for Mirko García Vélez
editnot own work, this image it is from Google Images, like as all of images upload for Mirko García Vélez. View EXIF. The user undestrand Wikimedia Commons. 186.135.133.12 20:38, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:12, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
not in use, no meaningful description so unuseful graphic Ezarateesteban 21:07, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:10, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
not in use nor categorized so not educational purpose, no descrition included also Ezarateesteban 21:10, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:09, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
nothing visible here, apparently and nor categorized nor in use Ezarateesteban 21:15, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: maybe useful to illustrate digital noise, otherwise useless Didym (talk) 00:09, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
1) Outside of Commons scope of COM:EDUSE. 2) Has been repeatedly used to vandalise a wikipedia article : [1] Animalparty (talk) 21:40, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:07, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
No mention of freely-usable license in the source page given by the uploader: http://placesandplatypie.com/archives/110512-PortlandMuseum.html 朝彦 | asahiko (talk) 22:18, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:06, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nu Moorish (talk · contribs)
editLow resolution, no EXIF data, no evidence of Own work
- File:Royal by law Prince Jamal El Osiris.jpg
- File:Royal Highness Prince Jamal El Osiris.jpg
- File:Prince Jamal El Osiris.jpg
— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 22:44, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:05, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Taherian522 (talk · contribs)
editLow resolution, small sizes, no EXIF data, images from internet, no evidence of Own work
- File:دختر بچه.jpg
- File:کودک.jpg
- File:لویز هی.jpg
- File:برنی سیگل2.jpg
- File:برنی سیگل1.jpg
- File:رابرت کیوساکی مدرسه تجارت.jpg
- File:رابرت کیوساکی.jpg
— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 22:47, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:04, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Screenshot from a movie. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:08, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:04, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Questionable authorship claims based on the low/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent metadata, and the uploader's history.
—LX (talk, contribs) 17:44, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Delete Deepak does not seem to be a notable person based on my research, so his two pictures appear to fall under the Commons:Deletion_policy#Not_educationally_useful category. Regarding the picture of Leslie Tripathy, I am not capable of opining with any authority, so my vote is for the two other pictures only. Dontreader (talk) 06:26, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:33, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata, and the uploader's history.
—LX (talk, contribs) 21:21, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Delete: Natuur12 (talk) 14:09, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Photo taken by Luke Kelly, probably not PD see: http://vineyardgazette.com/obituaries/2008/05/09/albert-alcalay-prominent-contemporary-artist-dies WεFt (talk) 17:59, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:32, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Artist Rinaldo Paluzzi is still alive. Not PD? WεFt (talk) 18:00, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: artist died in 2013, so permission via OTRS is needed Didym (talk) 00:31, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Still shot captured and cropped from a video ([2], around 2:18). Razvan Socol (talk) 18:01, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:30, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Magazine cover, found at [3], based on a 1950 photo of Salvador Dali by Willy Rizzo. Razvan Socol (talk) 18:14, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:29, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by LX as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Just another non-free Google search result. See Commons:Image casebook#Internet images. No FOP in Japan, unless the statue is already in the PD. Amitie 10g (talk) 18:19, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- The photo is grabbed from a Google search result, and the Creative Commons Attribution 1.0 Generic licensing claim is completely made up. There is absolutely no mention of that license, any other free license, or any other Creative Commons license at http://thehistroy.blogspot.com/2011/01/chitradurga-nayaka-kingdom.html. That makes any freedom of panorama issues a moot point, so the fact that freedom of panorama issues are not grounds for speedy deletion does not change that the fact that this should be speedily deleted. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:25, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete The copyright status of the statue is irrelevant as there is no evidence of permission from the photographer. --Stefan4 (talk) 23:28, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:28, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Vandalismo 95.39.233.245 18:20, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:27, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Amitie 10g (talk) 18:25, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:27, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
This image is commonly available on the Internet, but this does not make it free. It appears from this source that the image is copyrighted and is still available for sale. The original uploader has one edit, that of uploading this image, and is likely unfamiliar with our policies. We have no proof that rights to this image belong to the uploader. Hammersoft (talk) 18:44, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:21, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Photo of unnotable person. File isn't used. Brateevsky {talk} 18:46, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:20, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 19:12, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 00:18, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:19, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
unimportant/no links --90.179.147.103 17:06, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 00:48, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Contains unknown identifiable living person JaneArt (talk) 11:32, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 00:48, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
This image has to be deleted in order to upload a new version since this is an image from Google Earth uploaded by mistake --Fev 04:31, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2007 Didym (talk) 00:47, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
- The uploader just copied from a website and released as their own, see the watermark at the bottom-right of the image.--124.171.102.15 09:31, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2008 Didym (talk) 00:47, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
useless, no description Frédéric (talk) 07:18, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 00:46, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
I've made a mistake with this upload Afrodita nz 21:06, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2008 Didym (talk) 00:45, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
because it is no longer required and was uploaded by mistake Glabus (talk) 17:03, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 00:44, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Can't get it rotated, can't get it placed. I give up. R08-42 (talk) 23:53, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
Kept: Didym (talk) 00:43, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Bild ist nicht gemeinfrei Ralf Roletschek (talk) 23:29, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 00:43, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Non-commercial use only according to description -- Siebrand 16:24, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2007 Didym (talk) 00:42, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Because he's ugly as fuck 208.101.91.122 03:11, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- Keep COM:INUSE --Stefan4 (talk) 16:44, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Didym (talk) 00:41, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
probale copyvio no x data license may be wrong Jayanta Nath (talk) 12:37, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 00:41, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:lisa 8
A group of unrecognizable figures backlit. Out of COM:SCOPE, must be realistically useful for educational purpose. Also notice stripes above and below, which may show scanning from other source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:42, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:39, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Image was published last year at http://ebwmag.com/mg/?cat=50 without attribution. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:43, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:38, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Older image, looks like a rephotograph; Image (cropped) can be found all over the internet from older. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:49, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:37, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
I did not find this exact image in google search, but user's other uploads were all found instantly on other websites, there is no reason to believe this one is own work. Most likely COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:59, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:37, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by FoothillsRCool (talk · contribs)
editProbable COM:COPYVIOs. Of user's 11 uploads, all but three were easily found from other websites, credited to a variety of other photographers and yet ripped off here under claim of own work. Nominating the remaining 3 images under COM:PRP, we have no idea if uploader took these from somewhere as well, no indication of user's own work.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:10, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:36, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
COM:COPYVIOs: A series of book covers using imagery without source.
- File:Vl-06 (обложка книги Из недр Земли в стратосферу).jpg
- File:Vl-07 (обложка книги Путешествия Владимира Лысенко).jpg
- File:Vl-05 (обложка книги Вокруг света по экватору).jpg
- File:Vl-04 (книга Вокруг света на велосипеде).jpg
- File:Vl-03 (обложка книги Вокруг света на автомобиле).jpg
- File:Vl-01 (обложка научной книги).jpg
- File:Vl-02 (обложка книги На катамаране с высочайших вершин).jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:24, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
I think, Ellin Beltz don't understand Russian language, because on sections "Source" of ALL 7 photos there is definitely written (in Russian) that ALL these photos of Vladimir Lysenko works are belong to Vladimir Lysenko. And Vladimir Lysenko gave me ALL these 7 photos ONLY for placement in Vikipedia (in Russian) in page about him (page "Лысенко, Владимир Иванович"). Ellin Beltz have not a right to delete Vladimir Lysenko photos. Several from these photos are located on pages of Vladimir Lysenko on other sites - for example, http://skr2.ru/lysenko/lysenko-book-splav.php , http://skr2.ru/lysenko/lysenko-book-avto.php, etc.--СОРАН (talk) 13:53, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment "Gave me all", is the problem here. The rules of Commons are that the copyright holders are the ones who are able to release copyright, not their friends and associates. Commons has a process OTRS for this sort of situation. Perhaps you could ask M. Lysenko to fill in the OTRS form for these? Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:36, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
Vladimir Lysenko don't use neither Vikipedia, not Vikimedia Commons. What's why he have not a right to upload his photos in Vikimedia Commons. He gave me his photos to upload here with one purpose only - for using in his page in Vikipedia only.--СОРАН (talk) 04:13, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Uploading files "for use in Wikipedia only" is not permitted on Wikimedia Commons. All files must be under a free license. This means that it must be allowed to use them anywhere else. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 09:24, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:35, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused photo of a subject with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. According to Special:CentralAuth/Husainalmualim, the uploader has two edits on Arabic Wikipedia. Those appear to have been deleted, so it may have been intended for use in a vanity article there. Also, how can this photo not have an author? If this is really the uploader's own work (as claimed), then the uploader would be the author. But given the low resolution, missing metadata, the claim that the author is "nobody", and the fact that the uploader appears to be the subject of the photo rather than the one who created it, I'm not convinced that it is the uploader's own work. —LX (talk, contribs) 17:26, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:34, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
corrupt, invisible Herzi Pinki (talk) 13:24, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
Kept: file is OK Didym (talk) 01:03, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
(Wrong name. Available as Image:Uggleviksreservoaren_070610_C.JPG.) --Mats Halldin 05:43, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2007 Didym (talk) 01:01, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Redundant image Image:Bombay-Gymkhana-flag.svg --Nichalp 17:22, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2008 Didym (talk) 01:00, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
I messed up. Images is of the S-51, not S-55 and should be rotated. I'll reupload correct version with correct name. --NJR ZA (talk) 09:55, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 01:00, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
File was a test for another project Danielveyde (talk) 13:03, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 01:00, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
I entered the wrong file. Twram (talk) 00:14, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 01:00, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
copyvio ~Pyb (talk) 12:37, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2011 Didym (talk) 00:59, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
I am not interested in being published furthermore --Seeteufel 13:09, 12 February 2007 (UTC) alias Dobschuetz
Deleted: already deleted in 2007 Didym (talk) 00:59, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
double with Handbuch Hanicke 02.jpg Kuerschner 19:14, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2008 Didym (talk) 00:57, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Copyvio, image (photo) of magazine cover. Jlundqvi (talk) 14:49, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 00:57, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Wrong uploading Digitaldesignpht (talk) 12:22, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 00:57, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
a new image (Image:Kylling-bro-05-2007.jpg) is uploaded with correct name. The name is KYLLING. Sorry. --Halvard 21:49, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2007 Didym (talk) 00:56, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
a new image (Image:Kylling-bro-05-2007.jpg) is uploaded with correct name. The name is KYLLING. Sorry. --Halvard 21:53, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2007 Didym (talk) 00:56, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
all user contributions are copy violations from http://www.wittenannen.net/. JD {æ} 09:37, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2007 Didym (talk) 00:55, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
no valid liscense. needs to be deleted not allowed Model (talk) 01:14, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 00:55, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Incorrect Copyright Idakwyak (talk) 02:38, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 00:54, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
I don't know why anybody has proposed my uploded foto for speedy-deleting. It's neighter corrupt nor "out of scope". "Don't delete" Tkx (talk) 21:54, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Kept: Didym (talk) 00:53, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Copyvio or outside project scope. -Nard the Bard 03:05, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2008 Didym (talk) 00:52, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Bad quality, no use, too small San Andreas (talk) 21:04, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 00:52, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
permission DominicusOP (talk) 23:36, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 00:51, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
upload by mistake Laura.costas (talk) 14:51, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:50, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Non commercial not valid in Wikimedia projects. Ikiwaner 20:18, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2008 Didym (talk) 00:49, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
badname Patrice M (talk) 10:54, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 01:18, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
error : duplicata Jeangagnon (talk) 00:29, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2011 Didym (talk) 01:18, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Copyrighted image (screen capture). Rondador (talk) 13:51, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 01:17, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ices2Csharp (talk) 07:11, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2012 Didym (talk) 01:17, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Erreur de titre Slio.marc (talk) 01:53, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2014 Didym (talk) 01:17, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Terrible fuzzy quality and small size image, unused - out of COM:SCOPE whether or not it's TOO it's too poor quality to be used. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:26, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Yes, please delete it. I didn't know how to.
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:16, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Haohuabrothers (talk · contribs)
editPromotional uploads, probable COM:COPYVIOs for all the smaller images. Commons isn't the place to advertise your laser engraving tools.
- File:Desktop laser engraver skypeːliu.cnlaser mobileː̟86-15563539899.jpg
- File:3501120-10 desktop laser engraver cutter 50WX845MM 3050 size.jpg
- File:11261612-1 laser engraving cutting machine from sofia liu shehui laser equipment.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:30, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:15, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Promotional upload, out of COM:SCOPE, seems like a screenshot as well from all the leftovers in the corners. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:31, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:15, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
This logo is so small that it's outside of COM:SCOPE for pure unusability. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:31, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:14, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
This logo is out of COM:SCOPE because it is too small to use, it's invisible at this size. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:31, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:14, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on this small, low resolution image, probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:35, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:14, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
No longer want it on the site Einmyria (talk) 12:13, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Kept: CC licenses are not revocable Didym (talk) 01:13, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Wrong image. It isn't a consensus image for the project. Mwaldeck msg 22:32, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 01:12, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
All rights reserved on flickr Rettetast (talk) 11:27, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 01:11, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Wrong filename SkyBonTalk\Contributions 11:28, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 01:11, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
badname Patrice M (talk) 10:57, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 01:11, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
badname Patrice M (talk) 11:13, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 01:11, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
badname Patrice M (talk) 11:16, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 01:10, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
badname Patrice M (talk) 11:18, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 01:10, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
badname Patrice M (talk) 11:21, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 01:10, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Forgot to use a descriptive filename Sebquantic (talk) 15:16, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 01:09, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
The image has been copied from this site [4] (Copyright © 2002, Otterbäcken.se). The resolution is slightly different, but it's obviously the same image.
Deleted: already deleted in 2010, duplicate in 2012 Didym (talk) 01:09, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
couldn't get wikimedia to properly display the svg Emwu2 (talk) 01:49, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 01:08, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
copyvio http://www.lecanard.no Candyman777 (talk) 13:33, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 01:08, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
wrong description, useless Frédéric (talk) 19:02, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 01:08, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Not free! Michael Reschke (talk) 13:37, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 01:07, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Image is lifted from school website. Copyrighted image. Esrever (klaT) 21:21, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 01:07, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
No apparent educational use. deerstop. 15:50, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 01:07, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Duplikatsseite Farbenpracht (talk) 22:46, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 01:07, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
He backed out... this needed deleted. Hugh4life (talk) 12:37, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 01:06, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
photo of copyrighted sign Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:52, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 01:06, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
duplicate of Image:Hsmooth.png Skier Dude (talk) 02:45, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 01:05, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
copyright violation 87.5.107.68 21:12, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 01:05, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Because of "No Description" add new one. Csurucu 10:18, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2007 Didym (talk) 01:04, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Text file not in Commons Scope (Images only) --WayneRay 18:44, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2008 Didym (talk) 01:04, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Copyright infringement Dedinthewater (talk) 23:47, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 01:04, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
corrupt, invisible Herzi Pinki (talk) 13:23, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
Kept: file is OK Didym (talk) 01:03, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Corrupt file. Quibik (talk) 12:24, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 01:33, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Uploaded by mistake Flyerala (talk) 02:36, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 01:26, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
wrong license use Mrmcclur (talk) 23:00, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 01:26, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Copyrighted per metadata Jatkins (talk) 12:08, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 01:25, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
unused, useless, no description Frédéric (talk) 19:28, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 01:25, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
image of a copyrighted letterhead Samuell (talk) 01:56, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 01:24, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
This is a non-free picture; referred license is a joke 173.138.118.243 01:31, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 01:24, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Copyrighted image (screen capture). Rondador (talk) 13:52, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 01:23, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
I the uploader of this work want a deletion of this image because of unknown copyright status. This image was uploaded without any license. -Cedyk 15:55, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2007 Didym (talk) 01:22, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
I the uploader of this work want a deletion of this image because of unknown copyright status. This image was uploaded without any license. -Cedyk 15:58, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2007 Didym (talk) 01:22, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
I the uploader of this work want a deletion of this image because of unknown copyright status. This image was uploaded without any license. -Cedyk 15:59, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2007 Didym (talk) 01:20, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
I the uploader of this work want a deletion of this image because of unknown copyright status. This image was uploaded without any license. -Cedyk 16:02, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2007 Didym (talk) 01:20, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
I the uploader of this work want a deletion of this image because of unknown copyright status. This image was uploaded without any license. -Cedyk 16:05, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2007 Didym (talk) 01:20, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
duplicate: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wappen_Thal_(Ruhla).png 89.49.16.200 13:31, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 01:20, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
erreur copyright Foxpry (talk) 01:49, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 01:19, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Dublicate Eingangskontrolle (talk) 09:57, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 01:19, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
because it is rude and unneccesary 86.28.165.66 20:14, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- Keep COM:INUSE --Stefan4 (talk) 16:25, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Didym (talk) 01:18, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Version alredy in commons - File:Poussin Odyseus.JPG BurgererSF (talk) 17:55, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 01:48, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
watermark Digitaldesignpht (talk) 19:13, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 01:46, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
esta mal creado Laurita83 (talk) 11:40, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 01:46, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Copyright Tiraden (talk) 00:41, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 01:46, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
- Please delete this photo because wrong uploaded.E54764kenneth (talk) 08:53, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2012 Didym (talk) 01:45, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
This picture is improperly labeled, it is not the gun from the movie fifth element. This picture is a crop from a related file, the correct gun is in the top left of the larger picture.
Deleted: already deleted in 2014 Didym (talk) 01:44, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2229/12/172/figure/F3 --Felipe Yon (talk) 10:13, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2013 Didym (talk) 01:44, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
copyrighted. unknown author Lida Vorig (talk) 22:20, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 01:44, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Copy of File:NCIS Badge.jpg Raeky (talk) 09:16, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 01:43, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Błąd sorry OGlorioso (talk) 17:48, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 01:43, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Incorrect license info and duplicate file Sdazet (talk) 20:57, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 01:43, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
watermark Digitaldesignpht (talk) 19:15, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 01:43, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
badname Patrice M (talk) 10:50, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 01:43, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Not needed. Duplicate. JoeJohnson2 (talk) 13:24, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 01:42, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
micael 83.247.121.42 11:08, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Kept: nonsense nomination Didym (talk) 01:42, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
too big Jomatofa (talk) 22:21, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion Didym (talk) 01:41, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Error made, file did not need to be uploaded CcWiki (talk) 13:26, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 01:40, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
this is logo of an Institute Jayanta Nath (talk) 11:41, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 01:40, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Duplikat einer Datei Co riolis (talk) 07:49, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 01:40, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
It was a test photo. Sorry. Aveg15 (talk) 03:21, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:40, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
i duplicated it Florixc (talk) 17:46, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 01:38, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
i uploaded on accident Silly123456 (talk) 04:38, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 01:38, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
wrong policy set Sameer dhulap (talk) 08:25, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 01:38, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
File:Vista do Centro.JPG Thibinha (talk) 02:33, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 01:38, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
To correct filename. Solomon203 (talk) 00:01, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 01:37, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Invalid license. No license info at source Vssun (talk) 04:07, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 01:35, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Don't know Copyright and No Good Sources Alex9113 (talk) 23:13, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 01:34, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
bad resolution E-prinz (talk) 05:55, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 01:34, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
useless, no encyclopedic value Frédéric (talk) 07:47, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 01:34, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Cheap pornographic picture - not educational in any way 190.10.13.186 04:18, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 01:34, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
While the photo may be user's own work, the document depicted is not. Unused & out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:23, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:02, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
(Better Version has been uploaded: Rhein-Marne-Kanal_Alsace.jpg) --T3 chris 10:14, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2007 Didym (talk) 02:02, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
duplicate of Image:Eton College Quadrangle.png --Knuckles 22:28, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2008 Didym (talk) 02:01, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
REASON(mandatory) --teacoolish 11:25, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2007 Didym (talk) 02:01, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
copyvio Ultra7 (talk) 12:06, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 02:01, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
What's the sence of this picture? 88.66.232.131 20:34, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 02:01, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Doubtful license, picture copied from web. --Andrejj (talk) 16:39, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2011 Didym (talk) 02:00, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Copyvio. It isn't own work, it is the evident scan of the book. Uncle Fred 15:37, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2013 Didym (talk) 02:00, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Copyvio. It isn't own work, it is the evident scan of the book. Uncle Fred 15:40, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2013 Didym (talk) 01:59, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Uploader does not hold the copyright. Not GFDL. Quadell (talk) 19:37, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 01:59, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Size Cgal0924 (talk) 22:09, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 01:59, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Rotated image. I will upload this image correctly. Dorieo (talk) 19:35, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
- Keep The file was rotated by Rotatebot (talk · contribs) in 2011. --Stefan4 (talk) 16:39, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Didym (talk) 01:59, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope personal image. /no use --LutzBruno (talk) 11:59, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2011 Didym (talk) 01:58, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Copyvio. Newspaper article. --RenéV (talk) 11:27, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2014 Didym (talk) 01:58, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Copyvio. Newspaper article. --RenéV (talk) 11:29, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2014 Didym (talk) 01:58, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Copyvio. Newspaper article. --RenéV (talk) 11:31, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2014 Didym (talk) 01:57, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Copyvio. Newspaper article. --RenéV (talk) 11:33, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2014 Didym (talk) 01:57, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
bad name, duplicity to Image:Křenická-věžáky.jpg --ŠJů 06:38, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2007 Didym (talk) 01:57, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Book-Cover (URV) Sarkana frag den ℑ Vampir 20:42, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 01:56, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
useless Frédéric (talk) 18:52, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 01:56, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
useless Frédéric (talk) 19:36, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 01:56, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
existing file Pollice (talk) 15:04, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 01:56, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Section is empty Lady Lotus (talk) 13:08, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in February Didym (talk) 01:55, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
I'm afraid it's too bad quality. --Adam78 19:24, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2007 Didym (talk) 01:55, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
This picture is not older then 100 years. It is by an unknown author and not taken by user Torvindus. copyvio. --Rlbberlin 01:45, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2007 Didym (talk) 01:55, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
121.222.253.36 00:56, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted and restored in 2010, deleted again in 2011 Didym (talk) 01:53, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
self promotion Frédéric (talk) 12:45, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 01:52, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
there exists the same file ShiftFn (talk) 00:17, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 01:52, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
I would propose deleting this image because it an identical structure exists at Image:Sodium-acetate-2D-skeletal.png Rifleman 82 16:19, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2007 Didym (talk) 01:51, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
all user contributions are copy violations from http://www.wittenannen.net/. JD {æ} 09:37, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2007 Didym (talk) 01:51, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
not legal --Camelopardalis2008 16:17, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2008 Didym (talk) 01:50, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
No evidence of permission EhJJ (talk) 20:20, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 01:50, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
bad filename (my mistake), replaced by Image:APEC2006 Roh Bush Abe (2).jpg --PFHLai 01:02, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2006 Didym (talk) 01:50, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
era una prueba Camelothspencer (talk) 15:56, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 01:49, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
svg version avaible Lobsterbake (talk) 11:30, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 01:49, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused photo of personal object (home) like in private photoalbum. 178.205.101.6 12:02, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2014 Didym (talk) 01:49, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
This image has been replaced with image:Zn-predom-diagram.svg, which is of better quality. Both images were created by me. --Metallos 01:15, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2007 Didym (talk) 01:48, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Infringes WP:IMG Phrack1976 (talk) 17:22, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2011 Didym (talk) 01:48, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
this image may not be free enough for use on commons --128.172.143.44 18:49, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2007 Didym (talk) 02:31, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
advert, out of scope --66.57.4.150 14:48, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 02:31, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
copyright violation Marmale (talk) 21:58, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 02:31, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Incorrect license info Sdazet (talk) 20:58, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 02:30, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
It's an official artwork from Capcom and therefor presumably a copyright violation. -- 46.115.52.246 10:00, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2013 Didym (talk) 02:29, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
error Williams sakuma 01:20, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2008 Didym (talk) 02:28, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
http://www.metro.df.gob.mx/red/estacion.html?valor=1&id=99 189.233.39.228 23:13, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 02:28, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2013 Didym (talk) 02:26, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
fairuse: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:P_Westenthaler.JPG?uselang=en I don' see a "explicit permision" --32.453.23.946 21:24, 20
Deleted: already deleted in 2006 Didym (talk) 02:25, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
unfree, Kuba died in 1956, licence ist "licensed for non-commercial purposes" Dundak 16:42, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2006 Didym (talk) 02:25, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Photograph of a TV screen Ytoyoda (talk) 21:21, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 02:25, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Photograph of a TV screen Ytoyoda (talk) 21:21, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 02:24, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
The file was only a test file. Ykchan (talk) 12:37, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 02:24, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Copyrighted image DoriSmith (talk) 01:04, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 02:24, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Copyright violation - see http://www.peterj.com.au/ 69.159.40.222 00:33, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 02:24, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
bad name Danielos (talk) 10:31, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 02:23, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2013 Didym (talk) 02:23, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
not used, not even on the user page, no source and license information -- Frumpy 19:46, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2007 Didym (talk) 02:23, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
DELETE PLEASE Al-capone-36 (talk) 02:28, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2014 Didym (talk) 02:22, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Urheberrechtsverletzung PTWZ (talk) 17:41, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 02:22, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
repeated Abuyusuf eg (talk) 08:28, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 02:22, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
fehler bei der lizens gemacht Bayhof (talk) 20:27, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 02:22, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
copyright violation MartinS (talk) 21:16, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 02:21, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
incorrect license info Sdazet (talk) 20:56, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 02:21, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2013 Didym (talk) 02:21, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Wrong name, by my mistake --L84AD8 18:07, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2008 Didym (talk) 02:21, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
accidental upload Gj1234 (talk) 21:51, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 02:20, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
not used Gnarsgnars (talk) 15:01, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 02:20, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
obvious copyvio Bikasuishin (talk) 20:26, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2012 Didym (talk) 02:20, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Samonster.jpg SamShearon (talk) 19:22, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2014 Didym (talk) 02:19, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
copyvio Jejecam (talk) 07:11, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 02:19, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
copyvio Jejecam (talk) 07:12, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 02:19, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
copyvio Jejecam (talk) 07:12, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 02:19, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
copyvio Jejecam (talk) 07:12, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 02:18, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Seems to be fictional. --Atamari (talk) 14:06, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2011 Didym (talk) 02:18, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
all user contributions are copy violations from http://www.wittenannen.net/. JD {æ} 09:36, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2007 Didym (talk) 02:18, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
fake license. -Nard the Bard 15:15, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 02:18, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Too dirty. Andrius Burlėga (talk) 12:27, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion Didym (talk) 02:17, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Not useful. It was copied from en where it was being deleted as orphan. Damiens.rf 11:00, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 02:17, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Wrong Image Jess.kurian (talk) 03:21, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2011 Didym (talk) 02:16, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Copy of File:Logo macrophone.jpg with a worse name 151.57.92.221 22:30, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 02:16, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo of the band. Quibik (talk) 05:17, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 02:16, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Duplicate. Wrong filename. Jlundqvi (talk) 07:16, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 02:15, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
We meet TUCANESS LLC Licensing requirements. Any questions in Regards to this material, please contact Ramon Navarro (PR of Los Tucanes de Tijuana) [email protected]
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 02:14, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
i do not like it Ekharlamov (talk) 15:17, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 02:14, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Incorrect representation Izzedine (talk) 00:51, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 02:14, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
unused, no encycl. value Frédéric (talk) 20:11, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 02:14, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
own mistake importation Tetglawson (talk) 09:23, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 02:13, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
useless, no encyclopedic value Frédéric (talk) 18:32, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 02:13, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lego train layout at National Train Show 2005.JPG
Logo, copyvio issue Fabizor (talk) 08:41, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2011 Didym (talk) 02:11, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
hate,murder,bootcamps Mrry.dmlo (talk) 15:49, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Kept: nonsense nomination Didym (talk) 02:11, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Doublon de File:Zelda's_Link.jpg Apoz (talk) 17:20, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 02:10, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Hommo (talk) 13:10, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 02:10, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
because It is not an accurate portrait of mr. irving 69.108.98.206 18:47, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 02:10, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
filename has no description Redtails (talk) 18:35, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 02:09, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
This picture was uploaded by mistake; it was taken by a friend not by me Hanay (talk) 08:33, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 02:08, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
This picture was uploaded by mistake; it was taken by a friend not by me Hanay (talk) 08:35, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 02:08, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
This picture was uploaded by mistake; it was taken by a friend not by me Hanay (talk) 08:34, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 02:08, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
This picture was uploaded by mistake; it was taken by a friend not by me Hanay (talk) 08:33, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 02:08, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
This picture was uploaded by mistake; it was taken by a friend not by me Hanay (talk) 08:34, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 02:08, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
This picture was uploaded by mistake; it was taken by a friend not by me Hanay (talk) 08:32, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 02:08, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
This picture was uploaded by mistake; it was taken by a friend not by me Hanay (talk) 08:36, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 02:08, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
This picture was uploaded by mistake; it was taken by a friend not by me Hanay (talk) 08:37, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 02:08, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
This picture was uploaded by mistake; it was taken by a friend not by me Hanay (talk) 08:38, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 02:08, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
This picture was uploaded by mistake; it was taken by a friend not by me Hanay (talk) 08:38, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 02:07, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
This picture was uploaded by mistake; it was taken by a friend not by me Hanay (talk) 08:39, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 02:07, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
This picture was uploaded by mistake; it was taken by a friend not by me Hanay (talk) 08:39, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 02:07, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
This picture was uploaded by mistake; it was taken by a friend not by me Hanay (talk) 08:40, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 02:07, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
This picture was uploaded by mistake; it was taken by a friend not by me Hanay (talk) 08:43, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 02:07, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
This picture was uploaded by mistake; it was taken by a friend not by me Hanay (talk) 08:43, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 02:07, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on this tiny, blurry image which appears to have been cropped from a screenshot. Possible COM:COPYVIO. User can prove me wrong by uploading full size original image instead of a tiny thumbnail. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:07, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:06, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Old photo (see crinkles in corners) claimed as own work by uploader. Unused & out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:09, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:05, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused image of male, out of COM:SCOPE - not personal photo album. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:10, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:04, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Promotional, read description. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:14, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:04, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Old personal holiday snaps, out of COM:SCOPE.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:22, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:03, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:47, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TeezyOfficial (talk · contribs)
editPromo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:46, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
unused personal? photo, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 15:27, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:45, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
advert, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 15:30, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:44, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
small size, low resolution, no metadata, no indication of own work by uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:34, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:44, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Some form of document, unused, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:35, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:43, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused chart, out of COM:SCOPE Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:37, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:42, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Possible hoax or spoof upload, out of COM:SCOPE, too small, too blurry and unused. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:04, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:39, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused image of man, no metadata, no indication of user's own work, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:05, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:39, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, no indication of user's own work, appears to have been scanned from something else, very pixelated / halftoned in corners. Possible COM:COPYVIO but out of COM:SCOPE as unused. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:06, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:38, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Library of Congress.jpg
This file (image) is a duplicate. WesternRoad (talk) 05:52, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 02:37, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Likely not created by uploader. Also, incorporates a copyrighted logo (x2). Wordbuilder 03:11, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2007 Didym (talk) 02:37, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
revoke permission Sneakwit (talk) 05:35, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 02:37, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Error en el nombre Jabul (talk) 10:50, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 02:36, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
copyright violation MartinS (talk) 21:17, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 02:36, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
nie ma licencji Adri991 (talk) 22:48, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2011 Didym (talk) 02:36, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
No FoP in the UAE. 84.61.131.18 12:01, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 02:36, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
I believe it is not the owner's work Arman Cagle (talk) 20:39, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2011 Didym (talk) 02:36, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
The picture doesn't has any description, and it seems to be taken direct from web-TV, television or something. Erik Fløan 15:05, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2007 Didym (talk) 02:35, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
useless Frédéric (talk) 18:57, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 02:35, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
no copyright Nardoleo (talk) 09:39, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 02:35, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Duplicate AlbertoGG (talk) 12:08, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 02:34, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
No FoP in the UAE. 84.61.131.18 08:58, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 02:34, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
No FoP in the UAE. 84.61.131.18 11:03, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 02:34, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
autor --Юкатан 13:25, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2008 Didym (talk) 02:34, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
no copyright Nardoleo (talk) 09:36, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2009 Didym (talk) 02:33, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Incorrect license info Sdazet (talk) 20:59, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 02:33, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
not used Gnarsgnars (talk) 15:01, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 02:33, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Buidling owner asked to remove the image, because it is in the process of restoration
Kept: no valid reason for deletion Didym (talk) 02:33, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
No info about the author or source. Google search shows another image with higher resolution, see here. Only one contribution of this user. Wouter (talk) 10:40, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:02, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
High St changed so much. Photos shows viability. 86.18.240.236 11:11, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Keep If this High Street has changed significantly in past 8 years, then this image is a valuable historical image.--Nilfanion (talk) 12:19, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep per COM:INUSE. —Mr. Granger (talk · contribs) 12:51, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Didym (talk) 03:01, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Town center is under transformation. Should be ready for a photo in a couple of days from today 90.216.231.226 11:26, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep File has historical value and per COM:INUSE. Rodhullandemu (talk) 11:58, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep per above. I suggest a speedy close. --★ Poké95 13:03, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep COM:INUSE, and historical images are not automatically out of scope. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:00, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. No reason for deletion given. Moreover, as noted above, COM:INUSE applies. —Mr. Granger (talk · contribs) 14:45, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per abive. --INeverCry 00:30, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kamal Paneru (writer) (talk · contribs)
editUploaded by the author for article about his non-notable book, deleted at en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Why Should I Love You...???
- File:Why should i love you.jpg
- File:Why Should I Love You (Cover)-1.jpg
- File:Why Should I Love You (Cover)-2.jpg
- File:Why Should I Love You (Cover)-Final.jpg
JohnCD (talk) 12:23, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:01, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 13:07, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:59, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Didn't look to close at the original (because I don;t think I want to know) - I think uploader meant to undo the upload and blacked it out. -- Deadstar (msg) 14:10, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:56, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:55, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:55, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:54, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:54, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:54, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:53, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:53, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:52, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:52, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:51, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by جزائر مغنية (talk · contribs)
editUnlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Many private photos seems out of Commons:Project scope.
- File:مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا (66).jpg
- File:مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا (49).jpg
- File:مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا (26).jpg
- File:مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا (25).jpg
- File:مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا (24).jpg
- File:مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا (23).jpg
- File:مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا (22).jpg
- File:مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا (20).jpg
- File:مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا (18).jpg
- File:مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا (9).jpg
- File:مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا (4).jpg
- File:مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا (2).jpg
- File:مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا (90).jpg
- File:مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا (89).jpg
- File:مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا (77).jpg
- File:مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا .jpg
- File:مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا1....jpg
- File:مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا01 (5).jpg
- File:مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا01 (4).jpg
- File:مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا01 (3).jpg
- File:مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا01 (2).jpg
- File:مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا01 (1).jpg
- File:مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا01.jpg
- File:مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا01 (52).jpg
- File:مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا01 (51).jpg
- File:مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا01 (50).jpg
- File:مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا01 (49).jpg
- File:مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا01 (45).jpg
- File:مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا01 (44).jpg
- File:مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا01 (43).jpg
- File:مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا01 (41).jpg
- File:مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا01 (35).jpg
- File:مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا01 (31).jpg
- File:مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا01 (30).jpg
- File:مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا01 (23).jpg
- File:مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا01 (11).jpg
- File:26مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا.jpg
- File:25مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا.jpg
- File:24مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا.jpg
- File:23مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا.jpg
- File:22مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا.jpg
- File:21مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا.jpg
- File:20مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا.jpg
- File:19مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا.jpg
- File:18مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا.jpg
- File:17مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا.jpg
- File:16مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا.jpg
- File:15مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا.jpg
- File:14مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا.jpg
- File:13مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا.jpg
- File:12مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا.jpg
- File:11مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا.jpg
- File:9مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا.jpg
- File:8مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا.jpg
- File:7مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا.jpg
- File:6مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا.jpg
- File:5مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا.jpg
- File:4مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا.jpg
- File:3مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا.jpg
- File:2مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا.jpg
- File:1مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا.jpg
- File:مدينة مغنية هي الحب والعشق معا.jpg
- File:الحاجة مغنية هي كلمة مدينة هي مقبرة.jpg
- File:القبة الحاجة مغنية ضريحها بي المقبرة.jpg
- File:La nécessité pour le chanteur sous-porte.jpg
- File:La porte principale avait besoin d'un chanteur.jpg
- File:لباب الفرعي الحاجة مغنية.jpg
- File:الباب الرئيسي الحاجة مغنية.jpg
- File:القبة الحاجة مغنية ضريحها.jpg
- File:الحاجة مغنية هي مدينة مغنية وكلمة مدينة هي مقبرة.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:51, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Jan Blomqvist
editSerious doubts about the notability of the depicted person. No file description or other hint at notability. Uploader has made only this two contributions. The interwiki link of the category points to a different person.
Rudolph Buch (talk) 14:43, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 02:48, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope INeverCry 02:12, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:14, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:13, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:14, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aduquearte (talk · contribs)
editOut of scope - unused personal artworks
INeverCry 02:15, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:13, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused image of non-notable person INeverCry 02:16, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:12, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused images of non-notable person
INeverCry 02:17, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:12, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused image of non-notable person INeverCry 02:19, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:11, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Possible spam, or copyrighted. It is a small size and of no conceivable use as well. Alan Liefting (talk) 04:08, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:10, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
out of scope 186.135.133.12 06:07, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:09, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
out of scope 186.135.133.12 06:08, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:08, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
out of scope 186.135.133.12 06:09, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:08, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
not free, out of scope 186.135.133.12 06:13, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:07, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Promotional poster, hardly own work, missing EXIF/permisson Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:53, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:04, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of scope, should be converted to wikitext if notable Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:56, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:04, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
uploaded with incorrect permissions info. Soholounge (talk) 17:49, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2010 Didym (talk) 03:06, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
This is a logo of an organization so it is not free --Sağlamcı 14:00, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2008 Didym (talk) 03:06, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
author requested Gobonobo (talk) 00:36, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted in 2011 Didym (talk) 03:07, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:43, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:29, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Nearby copy of File:Russian Theatre Odessa.jpg Yuriy Kvach (talk) 09:18, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:26, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:46, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:25, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:48, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:24, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:48, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:24, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:50, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 03:23, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal image used for self promotion. The file name is also a bit how you doin. Alan Liefting (talk) 00:02, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:37, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal image. A selfie out of scope. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 00:04, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:34, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal image. A selfie out of scope. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 00:04, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:34, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal image. A selfie out of scope. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 00:09, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:34, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Not own work. Image taken from here: http://www.idmedina.ru/minbare/?5876 Cap1000 (talk) 00:25, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:36, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope, no educational purpose and nothing we do not already have. NN logo for band Gaff (talk) 02:26, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Fastily Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:41, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
screenshot of a website with (c). Abiyoyo (talk) 03:09, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:42, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 09:11, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:43, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 09:12, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:43, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 09:14, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:43, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 09:14, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:44, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 09:15, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:44, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
please upload with jpeg-format and captured version Motopark (talk) 09:16, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:44, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 09:16, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:44, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 09:17, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:44, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 09:17, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:44, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 09:18, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:45, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 09:18, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:45, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 09:19, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:45, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 09:20, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:45, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 09:20, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:45, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 13:23, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom and missing permission too Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:46, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:47, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on this highly pixeled image which is unused. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:45, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:47, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
There's no possible way this is old or old art, the image was taken in 2015, most likely NOT by the uploader, probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:48, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Definitely not PD, missing permission, and per Ellin Beltz Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:48, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Old grainy photo unlikely to be user's own work other than as rephotograph of old image. Needs valid source! Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:55, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom, hardly own work, missing EXIF Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:48, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Requested by uploader and Wikisource editor: redirect to to the correct title. will request delinking. — Ineuw 08:37, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:49, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
please delete, incorrect ship name after displacement -- Biberbaer (talk) 18:14, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Apparently been deleted Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:49, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Not the right/most recent version -Chrisnb (talk) 12:56, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: No file by that name. Yann (talk) 11:13, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
location false Abihut (talk) 16:26, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- If the location is wrong, just edit the description. If you really want to delete the file, please use {{Speedy}} instead. --Amitie 10g (talk) 22:59, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 11:14, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
No discussions going on Leftcry (talk) 00:03, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep The talk page should just be reverted to the revision containing a statement by someone. --Stefan4 (talk) 01:33, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- The statement was directed to me and right away moved to my talk page by the IP address who posted it. The IP address did not continue discussing the issue so I'm guessing it is now settled. --Leftcry (talk) 04:17, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 11:19, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Just how many of these images do we need? Alan Liefting (talk) 00:06, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. I've added this image to Wikivoyage:en:Kutch, so it is now in use. —Mr. Granger (talk · contribs) 12:30, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: In use. Yann (talk) 11:20, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Poorly composed image of next to no educational use. Alan Liefting (talk) 00:07, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. This photo could use to be cropped, but after cropping, it would be a useful picture of Al Alamia Mall. As far as I can tell, it is one of very few 21st-century images of Jahra, Kuwait on Commons, giving it distinctive educational value. —Mr. Granger (talk · contribs) 12:35, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 11:20, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Commons is not for photos snapped with no thought as to usage and composition of the image. Alan Liefting (talk) 00:08, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 11:20, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Appears to violate COM:FOP Kuwait, unless the building is in the public domain. Previously kept, but no good deletion reason was given last time. Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:41, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:22, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
Copyvio: does not seem like a self-portrait. Abiyoyo (talk) 00:09, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Photoboot image, no copyright. Yann (talk) 11:21, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
watermarked image Ricky Setiawan (talk) 00:19, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Uncertain copyright. Yann (talk) 11:21, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Nearby copy of File:Картинна галерея О.П. Руссова-1.jpg Yuriy Kvach (talk) 09:20, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: In use. Yann (talk) 11:22, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope.Personal image of a non notable location Reguyla (talk) 00:51, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:24, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope.Personal image of a non notable location Reguyla (talk) 00:52, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Renamed. Yann (talk) 11:27, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope.Personal image of a non notable location Reguyla (talk) 00:54, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:29, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope.Personal image of a non notable location not used on any wiki's Reguyla (talk) 00:55, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:29, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Unusewd personal image Alan Liefting (talk) 00:52, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:37, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Watermarked image. Possibly copyrighted. Alan Liefting (talk) 01:15, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Source is [5], ARR. Yann (talk) 11:39, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
This seems to be based on six images, but only five sources are given. Stefan4 (talk) 01:40, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Where are the six images? File:ABDALI-Sunrise.JPG is used twice. Andy Dingley (talk) 01:45, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Oh, I didn't notice that one picture was used twice. I guess everything is fine, then. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:52, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:40, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
copyvio, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Atgti.jpg. Abiyoyo (talk) 03:06, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 11:41, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
copyvio, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Atgti.jpg. Abiyoyo (talk) 03:07, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Duplicate of File:CMCOA.jpeg. Yann (talk) 11:43, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Exact duplicate of File:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg; not in use. Alkari (?), 11 March 2015, 03:25 UTC 03:25, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Good morning!
This is not an exact duplicate. While the images may appear the same, the layers and construction of the vector graphic are completely different.
If you open the both files, you'll see the Alkari's flag is made using strokes and some kind of clipping. When I open Alkari's flag in Adobe Illustrator, an error appears that says “The following items could not be imported properly: Clipping will be lost on roundtrip to Tiny” and the image gets distorted when the file opens.
Had I been able to open the file correctly, I would used Alkari's flag and not have had to created my own version of it. My flag was made using solid boxes with colors, and will not cause errors or change in layout when opened in various drawing programs.
All that aside, if you feel this violates a Wiki policy or you feel the construction of the image isn't important, feel free to delete it :) Just thought it might be useful for other users who into the same issue I did with Alkari's flag.
Thanks!
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:43, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Missing legal info Fixertool (talk) 04:06, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:44, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
PD-AR-Photo not apply fot TV screenshots 186.135.133.12 06:04, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- As I can upload screenshot , which license ? The TV program aired over 25 years, do not pay more copyright in Argentina. Please explain to me, thanks... --Kinematic (talk) 02:37, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Argentine copyright law specifies the term of 25 years since publication only for photographs, not for TV screenshots. As a screenshot, it is copyrighted by the channel that aired the show. Fma12 (talk) 02:37, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:45, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
includes big poster which copyright are unknown Motopark (talk) 06:46, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Not OK: Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Argentina. Yann (talk) 11:46, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
includes big poster which copyright are unknown Motopark (talk) 06:47, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Not OK: Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Argentina. Yann (talk) 11:46, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE, no encyclopaedic use possible, there are far more better images of full moons. Herzi Pinki (talk) 07:15, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:47, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Appears to be a personal photo, unlikely to be used for educational purposes Gbawden (talk) 08:28, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:48, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Copyvio (no ticket). Cjp24 (talk) 08:30, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:48, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Paintings are considered as "graphic work" in the UK and are not covered by FOP. BrightRaven (talk) 09:16, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Oops! This is not a painting, but a cut canvas. So yes, it it probably not a graphic work, so FOP could apply. BrightRaven (talk) 09:18, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 11:48, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
This is an old, unused image, taken by myself, now replaced by new, professional photographs Szczebrzeszynski (talk) 09:20, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Mr Łukasz Krupiński asked me to delete this old image, he prefers newer professional photographs--Szczebrzeszynski (talk) 19:02, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:50, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Nearby copy of File:6. Phototypie Scherer, Nabholz & Co, Moscow.jpg Yuriy Kvach (talk) 09:21, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:50, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Nearby copy of File:Odessa Cadet Corps.jpg Yuriy Kvach (talk) 09:22, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:49, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Copyrighted film still within an exhibition. No evidence, that uploader has the right to put that pic under pd. Paulae (talk) 09:51, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:51, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Not used, and has no educational value. There are other better versions of the idea of this "flag" (e.g., FotUSA2), and i doubt any united state of America would dismiss the blue from its flag. Jokes Free4Me (talk) 09:56, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:51, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
The exact link is [6]. There is no evidence of free license. Juggler2005 (talk) 10:18, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:52, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
ย้ายไปใช้ไฟล์ Red Cross of Christianity.png DanMTaylor (talk) 11:35, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: In use. Yann (talk) 11:53, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
its not clear, there is a better version: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Viola_tricolor-2-yercaud-salem-India.JPG Arnaud Palastowicz (talk) 12:16, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:54, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Alexander Archipenko died in 1964. His works are not in the PD yet. BrightRaven (talk) 13:15, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:54, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Vector version available Eloy (talk) 13:20, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:55, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Because its a low-resolution duplicate of the File:Portrait of Paul Curie Wellcome L0005511.jpg Koffeeinist (talk) 14:02, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:58, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
1943 work is unlikely to be self made. -- Deadstar (msg) 14:06, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:58, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
I doubt this image of the blogger is self made. No exif, looks like grabbed from the web. -- Deadstar (msg) 15:00, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 11:58, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:09, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi, its not out of scope, as Bassel is a notable person on Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bassel_Khartabil
And, this Saturday in San Francisco, at the Wikimedia offices there is an editathon to improve the information about Bassel and Syrian detainees. This is feeder content for that edithon.
- https://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/45042
- https://www.eff.org/event/wikipedia-edit-thon-freebassel-day-2015
Jon Phillips (talk) 15:15, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Per Jon Phillips, sorry. Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:16, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 11:59, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:09, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination See en:Bassel Khartabil. Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:14, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 12:00, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
quality --Photohound 21:34, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
Kept: In use. Yann (talk) 12:01, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Redundant to this file: File:Brinckmansdorf in Rostock.svg N3MO (talk) 17:20, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: by Hedwig in Washington. Yann (talk) 12:02, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Outside project scope. -Nard the Bard 02:38, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
Deleted: by Rlevse. Yann (talk) 12:03, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
I have uploaded a better file (had file-problems with this version). --N3MO 14:26, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
File:Wappen Hansestadt Anklam.svg : newer version
Deleted: requested by the uploader. Yann (talk) 12:03, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of date; alternatives available 66.194.65.205 22:57, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
Kept: In use. Yann (talk) 12:06, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
bad naming. moved to Image:Smallpox vaccine injection.jpg --Indolences 04:36, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Deleted. --GeorgHH 09:11, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Deleted: Renamed, redirect deleted. Yann (talk) 12:07, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
User has given the said school as author but linked to him-/herself. Nothing indicates any connection though and I believe that it meets the threshold of originality and thus is copyrightable.
Deleted: by Túrelio. Yann (talk) 12:07, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
no puedo explicar su origen Atanasiolatur (talk) 02:12, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: by Killiondude. Yann (talk) 12:07, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Uploader is not the author : to fix, via OTRS or upload by author --MGuf (d) 13:39, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio. Yann (talk) 12:08, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Replaced by File:Schloss in Schagen.jpg. Tilla (talk) 01:58, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio. Yann (talk) 12:08, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Mistake --Rl91 (talk) 05:01, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio. Yann (talk) 12:08, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
duplicate WikedKentaur (talk) 19:03, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio. Yann (talk) 12:08, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Title written wrong. In the Commons, has other this file, written right. Eduardo P (talk) 01:50, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio. Yann (talk) 12:08, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Reason: uploader requested per http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Media_copyright_questions#Image_uploaded_by_mistake, completed deletion request
Deleted: by Túrelio. Yann (talk) 12:09, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
間違って同じ画像(Image:Shibuya PARCO Part1.JPG)を連続アップロードしてしまったため--Itasan 14:31, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
Deleted: by GeorgHH. Yann (talk) 12:09, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by D-Kuru. Yann (talk) 12:09, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Better img now uploaded. See mdm.jpg Prashanthns (talk) 05:36, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: User request. Yann (talk) 12:09, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
{{Non-free logo}} Ffahm (talk) 01:41, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fastily. Yann (talk) 12:10, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
I plan to upload a different version of the file to replace this one. 70.245.88.106 16:01, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: by Polarlys. Yann (talk) 12:10, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
This picture is not older then 100 years. It is by an unknown author and not taken by user Torvindus or user Rolling Thunder in de:Wiki. copyvio. --Rlbberlin 01:45, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
Deleted: by Polarlys. Yann (talk) 12:10, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Crooked photo and similar photo alredy exsists Tr6637 (talk) 17:30, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio. Yann (talk) 12:10, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
This image was created by me and I don't see any need, why it should be replaced with png-file. Waiting for reply... Nethunter (talk) 17:51, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Deleted: by Cecil. Yann (talk) 12:11, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Lacking of important information, like author, source, permission --High Contrast (talk) 17:33, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
Deleted: by EugeneZelenko. Yann (talk) 12:11, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
I plan to upload a different version of the file to replace this one. 70.245.88.106 16:05, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio. Yann (talk) 12:11, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Ha sido sustituido por una versión más reciente. MPrieto (talk) 07:34, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio. Yann (talk) 12:11, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
mislabel by the ESA, not a Hubble image but a Schmidt Observatory image.[7]--Clh288 17:02, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio. Yann (talk) 12:11, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Can't seem to get the height right Beru91 (talk) 21:09, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: by Kameraad Pjotr. Yann (talk) 12:12, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request -89.204.137.193 09:41, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fanghong. Yann (talk) 12:12, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Will be uploaded with correct name by me. Agatha Bauer (talk) 22:46, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: by Hedwig in Washington. Yann (talk) 12:12, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
I plan to upload a different version of the file to replace this one. 70.245.88.106 16:02, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio. Yann (talk) 12:12, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope, no educational purpose and nothing we do not already have. NN musician. Gaff (talk) 02:25, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope, no educational purpose and nothing we do not already have. NN musician. Gaff (talk) 02:25, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Low quality image, not usable. OSX (talk • contributions) 02:59, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Copyvio: definetly not a self-portrait. Abiyoyo (talk) 03:01, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Copyvio: definetly not a self-portrait. Abiyoyo (talk) 03:01, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Copyvio: definetly not a self-portrait. Abiyoyo (talk) 03:02, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Copyvio: does not ssem like a self-portrait. Abiyoyo (talk) 03:02, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
copyvio from uroweb.ru - web-site with (c). Abiyoyo (talk) 03:10, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 20:08, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 09:13, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 20:09, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 09:20, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Lucio Fontana
editArtworks by Lucio Fontana (d. 1968) located in Italy (where there is no FOP) and in a museum in Venezuela (where FOP is applicable in "streets, squares or other public places", so not in museums imho).
- File:Colonna Fontana Bolzano.jpg (Italy)
- File:Lucio Fontana "Ambiente Spaziale" con Concepto Spaziale Atessa (1968) Luz Apagada.jpg (Venezuela)
- File:Lucio Fontana "Ambiente Spaziale" con Concepto Spaziale Atessa (1968) Luz Encendida.jpg (Venezuela)
- File:Lucio Fontana sculptures 01.JPG (Italy)
- File:Lucio Fontana sculptures 02.JPG (Italy)
BrightRaven (talk) 09:23, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: copyrighted Ymblanter (talk) 20:10, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Roberto Barni is alive. No FOP in Italy. BrightRaven (talk) 14:04, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Likely to be collection of promo/fan images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 05:49, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
This DR includes 11 images by a single purpose account, this is all their uploads apart from File:PCity.png which seems copyright ineligible. The others lack EXIF data and fail the precautionary principle after I find the image File:-pop.jpg in an original uncropped version with its background un-masked at http://www.herrenausstatter.de/pimages/24/24073_norm.jpg. The images are all professional standard "web quality" images that you would expect to find in a men's underwear catalogue. Consequently the CC-BY-SA as "own work" by an anonymous account is not credible.
As the example file has been touched up by masking the background as well as cropping, simple Google image searches are far less likely to turn up the original sources.
- File:Slipverde.jpg
- File:Sliptrasero.jpg
- File:Sliprojo.jpg
- File:Sliplateral.jpg
- File:Slipdelante.jpg
- File:-pop.jpg
- File:Boxtrasero.jpg
- File:Boxertrans.jpg
- File:Boxerslipwhite.jpg
- File:Boxergray.jpg
- File:Miniboxerblanco.jpg
Fæ (talk) 15:59, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 00:48, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Previously uploaded and tagged as wrong data on https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Portrait_Peter_Rupp.jpeg, now uploaded to Commons. I don't think that this aged portrait is own work of uploader, there's no metadata, it's small and it looks like it was sepia'd or halftoned and then rephotographed or scanned. I'd like to see more information on the source of this image, because otherwise it's a possible COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:02, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- This picture is in my family documentation. I will use it next in an article about architecture in Germany. Erik Rupp — Preceding unsigned comment added by Erik Rupp (talk • contribs) 15:25, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Owning a copy of a photograph does not make you the owner of the copyright. The copyright belongs to the photographer or his heirs. This image cannot be kept on Commons without a license from them. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:30, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
PD-self is doubted Mattes (talk) 18:57, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in the Czech Republic. The text on the sign has a copyright, so we cannot keep this image without a license from its creator. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:46, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Not own work, image taken from here: http://afisha.sarbc.ru/objects/show/414/ Cap1000 (talk) 18:32, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Low quality image, better examples of this car available at Category:Toyota Vios (XP150). OSX II (talk) 23:39, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Low quality image, better examples of this car available at Category:Toyota Yaris (XP90). OSX II (talk) 23:42, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
This is a standard diploma given to museum visitors for trying out a flight simulator. It is not a "law, decision, or report issued by a Swedish public authority" and, more importantly, Västerås Flygmuseum is not a public authority. Peter Isotalo 00:51, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- That's largely correct, however I didn't "visit" the museum, but I booked 4 hours. Spend a night at a motel, after driving some 550 km (of which the last 150 isn't motorway) I find it very strange if Peter Isosalo is having difficulties to understand the diffrencies between a diploma and a certificate. To become a commercial DC10 pilot, which I most certainly am not, one first needs a certificate for single (piston engined) airplanes in good weather. Then a certificate for multi engined aircraft, then a certificate for instrument flight. And then jet engined experience of some kind and a type certificate for DC10. And after have flewn 5-10 years and having some 5000 hrs in the air, the last certificate is Captain, which entitle the person to sit in the left seat and not only fly but command and having the responsibility for passengers and crew during DC10 flights world wide. However the simulator I "flew" is a real former Scandinavian SAS DC10 simulator, and has been used for training of real pilots. It should be added that it isn't a "feeling" simulator (which moves), and hence school flights with real aircraft was mandatory. In later decades hve the flight simulators become so real that no schools fligts is needed anylonger (for the type certificates, that is).
- But I fail to understand the problem here. Would anyone believe the diploma at my personal page has anything remotelty to do with Swedish law, decision, or report issued by a Swedish public authority
- Peter, Since Västerås is located much closer to where You live, I would recommend You to see weather You find this simulator childishly easy to tax, take-off, rotate, climb, turn, trim, cruise, descend, approach, land on the centre wheels and stop within the runway boundries, or not. If You have access to MS Flight Simulator 9 (or 10 - but for learning, I would recommend version 9), You may do it aswell. When You can land the Boeing 737 which is included in the MS-program without crashing 10 times, then You would be as much prepared as is possible. The main difference is the last 100 feet (altitude), it must go slower on a larger aircraft. The fact You are sitting far higher up doesn't help. I bumped the first time, but no crash during perhaps 10 landings.
- .
- "Konst är något man inte kan, men kan man är det ingen konst"
- .
- A Swedish "wise phrase", build upon the fact that the Swedish words for "difficulty" and "art" may be one and the same - "konst". Translation becomes "Art/difficulty is something You can't manage to do, however when You can, it's no art/difficulty"
- Boeing720 (talk) 00:31, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- Besides the only use of this picture (to my knowledge) is at my personal Wikipedia page. Boeing720 (talk) 10:46, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
- Again: Västerås Flygmuseum is not a Swedish public authority (svensk myndighet). It's a privately run museum. The exception to Swedish copyright that you invoked here isn't applicable.
- Peter Isotalo 11:56, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: The diatribe above is entirely off point. This is a clear copyright violation. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:12, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Not own work. This image is available in internet. Example: http://www.garden-ufa.ru/sejnectitovki.htm Cap1000 (talk) 00:54, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Own work. The author of the website and photos in it = author photos Vitaly Bry.--Qweasdqwe (talk) 05:16, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
- Просьба номинатору не писать ложную информацию. Если у вас есть сомнение в авторстве, то так и пишете, а не придумывайте не существующее отрицание--Qweasdqwe (talk) 05:32, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: As noted, this appears on a web site with an explicit copyright notice. Therefore policy requires that the actual photographer send a free license to OTRS. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:15, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Not own work. This image is available in internet. Example: http://garden-ufa.ru/bash.htm Cap1000 (talk) 00:57, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Own work. The author of the website and photos in it = author photos Vitaly Bry.--Qweasdqwe (talk) 05:15, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
- Просьба номинатору не писать ложную информацию. Если у вас есть сомнение в авторстве, то так и пишете, а не придумывайте не существующее отрицание--Qweasdqwe (talk) 05:32, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: As noted, this appears on a web site with an explicit copyright notice. Therefore policy requires that the actual photographer send a free license to OTRS. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:15, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Not own work. This image is available in internet. Example: http://garden-ufa.ru/persijanka.htm Cap1000 (talk) 00:58, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Leave. On the site http://garden-ufa.ru/belfler_bash.htm and photo at Wikipedia-the author's own work he same Bry-Vitaly v. Brykin Look at the very bottom of the page is written-"Apple Orchard in Bashkiria" Ufa2011-2015 © Brykin V.f.--Qweasdqwe (talk) 10:29, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Dear Mr. Qweasdqwe, if I take nickname VHinz for example, its not a reason for me to upload on wiki all images of this [[8]]. According wiki rules, if pixs has been posted in internet BEFORE wiki, copyright owner must contact with OTRS for confirmation. Dont forget to read this article first: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requesting_copyright_permission Regars, Cap1000 (talk) 11:57, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Авторство В. Брыкина проверено его подтверждением по электронной почте [email protected]. Можно быть спокойным. Vitaly Bry и есть Виталий Брыкин. В этом номинатор мог бы и сам убедиться по эл. почте. Его адрес указан в сайте http://garden-ufa.ru/sharop.htm--Qweasdqwe (talk) 06:06, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- Извините проверено кем? Я очень надеюсь, что не лично Вами =) Если автор обращался в OTRS, хорошо бы ему сообщить об этом на странице обсуждения номинации самостоятельно. В ответ на обращение в службу OTRS, на загруженные им изображения установят шаблон со всей необходимой информацией. Вот пример [[9]] оформления [[10]] тикета от этой службы. После такого разрешения, файл разумеется не тронут. Кстати, хорошо бы автору принять участие в дискуссии самостоятельно, если он в этом заинтересован. Пока интереса с его стороны не наблюдается вовсе, что наводит на некоторые размышления. Хорошего Вам дня. Cap1000 (talk) 10:49, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- Спасибо за советы. Описываемый коллега хочет помочь мировому сообществу в описании яблонь и мы должны ему в этом помочь. --Qweasdqwe (talk) 09:08, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- Та без проблем =) Всегда хорошо, когда к работе в вики подключаются профессионалы своего дела. Многие статьи тут написаны любителями, поэтому их редактирование профессионалом всегда только на пользу. Что сейчас Виталию нужно сделать, я написал в ответ на его письмо на моей странице. Как только ответ на формальное письмо будет получен, защитим его загрузки и снимем с удаления^^ Cap1000 (talk) 09:53, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- Авторство В. Брыкина проверено его подтверждением по электронной почте [email protected]. Можно быть спокойным. Vitaly Bry и есть Виталий Брыкин. В этом номинатор мог бы и сам убедиться по эл. почте. Его адрес указан в сайте http://garden-ufa.ru/sharop.htm--Qweasdqwe (talk) 06:06, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: As noted, this appears on a web site with an explicit copyright notice. Therefore policy requires that the actual photographer send a free license to OTRS. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:17, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Not own work. This image is available in internet. Example: http://garden-ufa.ru/pepin_bash.htm Cap1000 (talk) 01:00, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Own work. The author of the website and photos in it = author photos Vitaly Bry. --Qweasdqwe (talk) 05:05, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
- Просьба номинатору не писать ложную информацию. Если у вас есть сомнение в авторстве, то так и пишете, а не придумывайте не существующее отрицание--Qweasdqwe (talk) 05:39, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: As noted, this appears on a web site with an explicit copyright notice. Therefore policy requires that the actual photographer send a free license to OTRS. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:17, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Not own work. This image is available in internet. Example: http://garden-ufa.ru/raneealoe.htm Cap1000 (talk) 01:01, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Leave. On the site http://garden-ufa.ru/belfler_bash.htm and photo at Wikipedia-the author's own work he same Bry-Vitaly v. Brykin Look at the very bottom of the page is written-"Apple Orchard in Bashkiria" Ufa2011-2015 © Brykin V.f. --Qweasdqwe (talk) 10:28, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Dear Mr. Qweasdqwe, if I take nickname VHinz for example, its not a reason for me to upload on wiki all images of this [[11]]. According wiki rules, if pixs has been posted in internet BEFORE wiki, copyright owner must contact with OTRS for confirmation. Dont forget to read this article first: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requesting_copyright_permission Regars, Cap1000 (talk) 11:57, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Уважаемый коллега. Авторство В. Брыкина проверено его подтверждением по электронной почте [email protected]. Можно быть спокойным. Vitaly Bry и есть Виталий Брыкин. В этом номинатор мог бы и сам убедиться по эл. почте. Его адрес указан в сайте http://garden-ufa.ru/sharop.htm--Qweasdqwe (talk) 06:07, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- Извините проверено кем? Я очень надеюсь, что не лично Вами =) Если автор обращался в OTRS, хорошо бы ему сообщить об этом на странице обсуждения номинации самостоятельно. В ответ на обращение в службу OTRS, на загруженные им изображения установят шаблон со всей необходимой информацией. Вот пример [[12]] оформления [[13]] тикета от этой службы. После такого разрешения, файл разумеется не тронут. Кстати, хорошо бы автору принять участие в дискуссии самостоятельно, если он в этом заинтересован. Пока интереса с его стороны не наблюдается вовсе, что наводит на некоторые размышления. Хорошего Вам дня. Cap1000 (talk) 10:49, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- Уважаемый коллега. Авторство В. Брыкина проверено его подтверждением по электронной почте [email protected]. Можно быть спокойным. Vitaly Bry и есть Виталий Брыкин. В этом номинатор мог бы и сам убедиться по эл. почте. Его адрес указан в сайте http://garden-ufa.ru/sharop.htm--Qweasdqwe (talk) 06:07, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- * Own work. The author of the website and photos in it = author photos Vitaly Bry.--Qweasdqwe (talk) 05:06, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
- Просьба номинатору не писать ложную информацию. Если у вас есть сомнение в авторстве, то так и пишете, а не придумывайте не существующее отрицание--Qweasdqwe (talk) 05:40, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: As noted, this appears on a web site with an explicit copyright notice. Therefore policy requires that the actual photographer send a free license to OTRS. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:17, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Not own work. This image is available in internet. Example: http://garden-ufa.ru/orlik.htm Cap1000 (talk) 01:02, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Leave. On the site http://garden-ufa.ru/belfler_bash.htm and photo at Wikipedia-the author's own work he same Bry-Vitaly v. Brykin Look at the very bottom of the page is written-"Apple Orchard in Bashkiria" Ufa2011-2015 © Brykin V.f.--Qweasdqwe (talk) 10:30, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Dear Mr. Qweasdqwe, if I take nickname VHinz for example, its not a reason for me to upload on wiki all images of this [[14]]. According wiki rules, if pixs has been posted in internet BEFORE wiki, copyright owner must contact with OTRS for confirmation. Dont forget to read this article first: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requesting_copyright_permission Regars, Cap1000 (talk) 11:56, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- ** Уважаемый коллега. Авторство В. Брыкина проверено его подтверждением по электронной почте [email protected]. Можно быть спокойным. Vitaly Bry и есть Виталий Брыкин. В этом номинатор мог бы и сам убедиться по эл. почте. Его адрес указан в сайте http://garden-ufa.ru/sharop.htm --Qweasdqwe (talk) 06:10, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- Извините проверено кем? Я очень надеюсь, что не лично Вами =) Если автор обращался в OTRS, хорошо бы ему сообщить об этом на странице обсуждения номинации самостоятельно. В ответ на обращение в службу OTRS, на загруженные им изображения установят шаблон со всей необходимой информацией. Вот пример [[15]] оформления [[16]] тикета от этой службы. После такого разрешения, файл разумеется не тронут. Кстати, хорошо бы автору принять участие в дискуссии самостоятельно, если он в этом заинтересован. Пока интереса с его стороны не наблюдается вовсе, что наводит на некоторые размышления. Хорошего Вам дня. Cap1000 (talk) 10:49, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- ** Уважаемый коллега. Авторство В. Брыкина проверено его подтверждением по электронной почте [email protected]. Можно быть спокойным. Vitaly Bry и есть Виталий Брыкин. В этом номинатор мог бы и сам убедиться по эл. почте. Его адрес указан в сайте http://garden-ufa.ru/sharop.htm --Qweasdqwe (talk) 06:10, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- Own work. The author of the website and photos in it = author photos Vitaly Bry.--Qweasdqwe (talk) 05:07, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
- Просьба номинатору не писать ложную информацию. Если у вас есть сомнение в авторстве, то так и пишете, а не придумывайте не существующее отрицание. Ложный вывод = ошибочной номинации. --Qweasdqwe (talk) 05:41, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: As noted, this appears on a web site with an explicit copyright notice. Therefore policy requires that the actual photographer send a free license to OTRS. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:17, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Not own work. This image is available in internet. Example: http://garden-ufa.ru/anaspol.htm Cap1000 (talk) 01:04, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Leave. On the site http://garden-ufa.ru/belfler_bash.htm and photo at Wikipedia-the author's own work he same Bry-Vitaly v. Brykin Look at the very bottom of the page is written-"Apple Orchard in Bashkiria" Ufa2011-2015 © Brykin V.f.--Qweasdqwe (talk) 10:29, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Dear Mr. Qweasdqwe, if I take nickname VHinz for example, its not a reason for me to upload on wiki all images of this [[17]]. According wiki rules, if pixs has been posted in internet BEFORE wiki, copyright owner must contact with OTRS for confirmation. Dont forget to read this article first: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requesting_copyright_permission Regars, Cap1000 (talk) 11:56, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Own work. The author of the website and photos in it = author photos Vitaly Bry.--Qweasdqwe (talk) 05:20, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
- Просьба номинатору не писать ложную информацию. Если у вас есть сомнение в авторстве, то так и пишете, а не придумывайте не существующее отрицание.--Qweasdqwe (talk) 05:28, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: As noted, this appears on a web site with an explicit copyright notice. Therefore policy requires that the actual photographer send a free license to OTRS. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:17, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Not own work. This image is available in internet. Example: http://garden-ufa.ru/belfler_bash.htm Cap1000 (talk) 01:05, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Leave. On the site http://garden-ufa.ru/belfler_bash.htm and the picture in Wikipedia-own work author Vitaly Bry zhe-b. Brykin --Qweasdqwe (talk) 10:23, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Dear Mr. Qweasdqwe, if I take nickname VHinz for example, its not a reason for me to upload on wiki all images of this [[18]]. According wiki rules, if pixs has been posted in internet BEFORE wiki, copyright owner must contact with OTRS for confirmation. Dont forget to read this article first: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requesting_copyright_permission Regars, Cap1000 (talk) 11:56, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Уважаемый коллега. Авторство В. Брыкина проверено его подтверждением по электронной почте [email protected]. Можно быть спокойным. Vitaly Bry и есть Виталий Брыкин. В этом номинатор мог бы и сам убедиться по эл. почте. Его адрес указан в сайте http://garden-ufa.ru/sharop.htm--Qweasdqwe (talk) 06:11, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- ** Извините проверено кем? Я очень надеюсь, что не лично Вами =) Если автор обращался в OTRS, хорошо бы ему сообщить об этом на странице обсуждения номинации самостоятельно. В ответ на обращение в службу OTRS, на загруженные им изображения установят шаблон со всей необходимой информацией. Вот пример [[19]] оформления [[20]] тикета от этой службы. После такого разрешения, файл разумеется не тронут. Кстати, хорошо бы автору принять участие в дискуссии самостоятельно, если он в этом заинтересован. Пока интереса с его стороны не наблюдается вовсе, что наводит на некоторые размышления. Хорошего Вам дня. Cap1000 (talk) 10:48, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- Уважаемый коллега. Авторство В. Брыкина проверено его подтверждением по электронной почте [email protected]. Можно быть спокойным. Vitaly Bry и есть Виталий Брыкин. В этом номинатор мог бы и сам убедиться по эл. почте. Его адрес указан в сайте http://garden-ufa.ru/sharop.htm--Qweasdqwe (talk) 06:11, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- Own work. The author of the website and photos in it = author photos Vitaly Bry.--Qweasdqwe (talk) 05:20, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
- Просьба номинатору не писать ложную информацию. Если у вас есть сомнение в авторстве, то так и пишете, а не придумывайте не существующее отрицание--Qweasdqwe (talk) 05:43, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: As noted, this appears on a web site with an explicit copyright notice. Therefore policy requires that the actual photographer send a free license to OTRS. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:18, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- Ошибка в номинации
Скопировать из плохой фотографии http://supersadovod.ru/sorta/sorta-yabloni/sort-yabloni-bashkirskiy-izumrud/ в качественную с большим разрешением невозможно. В фотографии указаны метаданные аппарата. Номинацию убрать. --Qweasdqwe (talk) 04:45, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
не собственную работу. Этот образ доступен в интернете. Пример: http://supersadovod.ru/sorta/sorta-yabloni/sort-yabloni-bashkirskiy-izumrud/ Cap1000 (<промежуток класс="подпись-говорить">⧼на Talkpagelinktext⧽</пролет>) 01:07, 11 марта 2015 года (по Гринвичу) * ** Уважаемый коллега. Авторство В. Брыкина проверено его подтверждением по электронной почте [email protected]. Можно быть спокойным. Виталий Брай и есть Виталий Брыкин. В этом номинатор мог бы и сам убедиться по эл. почте. Его адрес указан в сайте http://garden-ufa.ru/sharop.htm ** ** Извините проверено кем? Я очень надеюсь, что не лично Вами =) Если автор обращался в системы otrs, хорошо бы ему сообщить об этом на странице обсуждения номинации самостоятельно. В ответ на обращение в службу системы otrs, на загруженные изображения им установят шаблон со всей необходимой информацией. Вот пример [[21]] оформления [[22]] тикета от этой службы. После такого разрешения, разумеется файл не тронут. Cap1000 (<промежуток класс="подпись-говорить">⧼на Talkpagelinktext⧽</пролет>) 10:48, 12 марта 2015 года (по Гринвичу)
"Кстати, хорошо бы автору принять участие в дискуссии самостоятельно, если он в этом заинтересован. Пока интереса с его стороны не наблюдается вовсе, что наводит на некоторые размышления. Хорошего Вам дня".
Если б я знал, как это технически сделать. Но хорошо попробую. Я садовод-опытник из Уфы Виталий Брыкин в Википедии зарегистрирован, как Vitaly Bry(kin). Все фотографии размещенные мной темах сделаны мною. Это Анис полосатый, Башкирский красавец, Орлик, Абориген, Раннее алое, Бельфлер башкирский, Пепин башкирский. А так же в темах которые я написал сам - Сеянец Титовки, Шаропай, Персиянка. Не думал, что надо как-то доказывать свое авторство. Достаточно посмотреть мой сайт: http://garden-ufa.ru/index.htm В этой связи, когда Вы пишете, что фотография размещенная статье Башкирский изумруд взята с сайта http://supersadovod.ru/sorta/sorta-yabloni/sort-yabloni-bashkirskiy-izumrud/ это выглядит довольно странно. Так как оригинал фотографии размещенной в Википедии по объему и качеству намного превышает украденную у меня фотографию на сайте Суперсадовод(на который Вы ссылаетесь)
Я довольно часто сталкиваюсь с тем, что мои фотографии воруют и ставят на разных сайтах. В России несколько лет назад вышло даже пара книг, где в качестве иллюстраций используются ворованные у меня фотографии. Так же ставятся на разных сайтах мои статьи из журнала "Приусадебное хозяйство" и разных газет. Сначала я пытался как-то реагировать на это. Потом плюнул, так как это начинает занимать все больше и больше времени.
Решил подключится к работе Википедии, потому, что увидел, что в описании сортов нет фотографий. Кроме того, статьи изобилуют неточностями. В частности когда речь идет о годах получения сортов. За дату почему-то принимается время регистрации в госреестре. По этой логике, сорта не зарегистрированные в госреестре: Аркад, Апорт, Конфетное, Медуница и др. вообще не существуют.
Подскажите, как пошагово, доказать, что фото принадлежат мне буду признателен.
С уважением Виталий Брыкин
- Own work. The author of the website and photos in it = author photos Vitaly Bry.--Qweasdqwe (talk) 05:19, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: As noted, this appears on a web site with an explicit copyright notice. Therefore policy requires that the actual photographer send a free license to OTRS. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:18, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Not own work. This image is available in internet. Example: http://garden-ufa.ru/aborigen.htm Cap1000 (talk) 01:08, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Leave. On the site http://garden-ufa.ru/belfler_bash.htm and photo at Wikipedia-the author's own work he same Bry-Vitaly v. Brykin Look at the very bottom of the page is written-"Apple Orchard in Bashkiria" Ufa2011-2015 © Brykin V.f.--Qweasdqwe (talk) 10:33, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Dear Mr. Qweasdqwe, if I take nickname VHinz for example, its not a reason for me to upload on wiki all images of this [[23]]. According wiki rules, if pixs has been posted in internet BEFORE wiki, copyright owner must contact with OTRS for confirmation. Dont forget to read this article first: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requesting_copyright_permission Regars, Cap1000 (talk) 11:54, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Уважаемый коллега. Авторство В. Брыкина проверено его подтверждением по электронной почте [email protected]. Можно быть спокойным. Vitaly Bry и есть Виталий Брыкин. В этом номинатор мог бы и сам убедиться по эл. почте. Его адрес указан в сайте http://garden-ufa.ru/sharop.htm--Qweasdqwe (talk) 06:12, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- Извините проверено кем? Я очень надеюсь, что не лично Вами =) Если автор обращался в OTRS, хорошо бы ему сообщить об этом на странице обсуждения номинации самостоятельно. В ответ на обращение в службу OTRS, на загруженные им изображения установят шаблон со всей необходимой информацией. Вот пример [[24]] оформления [[25]] тикета от этой службы. После такого разрешения, файл разумеется не тронут. Кстати, хорошо бы автору принять участие в дискуссии самостоятельно, если он в этом заинтересован. Пока интереса с его стороны не наблюдается вовсе, что наводит на некоторые размышления. Хорошего Вам дня. Cap1000 (talk) 10:50, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- Уважаемый коллега. Авторство В. Брыкина проверено его подтверждением по электронной почте [email protected]. Можно быть спокойным. Vitaly Bry и есть Виталий Брыкин. В этом номинатор мог бы и сам убедиться по эл. почте. Его адрес указан в сайте http://garden-ufa.ru/sharop.htm--Qweasdqwe (talk) 06:12, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- Own work. The author of the website and photos in it = author photos Vitaly Bry.--Qweasdqwe (talk) 05:18, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
- Просьба номинатору не писать ложную информацию. Если у вас есть сомнение в авторстве, то так и пишете, а не придумывайте не существующее отрицание--Qweasdqwe (talk) 05:39, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: As noted, this appears on a web site with an explicit copyright notice. Therefore policy requires that the actual photographer send a free license to OTRS. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:18, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Not own work. This image is available in internet. Example: http://garden-ufa.ru/bash.htm Cap1000 (talk) 01:09, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Own work. The author of the website and photos in it = author photos Vitaly Bry.--Qweasdqwe (talk) 05:17, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
- Просьба номинатору не писать ложную информацию. Если у вас есть сомнение в авторстве, то так и пишете, а не придумывайте не существующее отрицание--Qweasdqwe (talk) 05:38, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: As noted, this appears on a web site with an explicit copyright notice. Therefore policy requires that the actual photographer send a free license to OTRS. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:18, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Not own work. This image is available in internet. Example: http://garden-ufa.ru/sharop.htm Cap1000 (talk) 01:09, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Просьба номинатору не писать ложную информацию. Если у вас есть сомнение в авторстве, то так и пишете, а не придумывайте не существующее отрицание. Авто сайта и фотографии один и тот же человек.--Qweasdqwe (talk) 05:34, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: As noted, this appears on a web site with an explicit copyright notice. Therefore policy requires that the actual photographer send a free license to OTRS. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:19, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Not own work. This image is available in internet. Example: http://garden-ufa.ru/sharop.htm Cap1000 (talk) 01:10, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Авторство В. Брыкина проверено его подтверждением по электронной почте [email protected]. Этот адрес указан в сайте http://garden-ufa.ru/sharop.htm --Qweasdqwe (talk) 06:01, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- Извините проверено кем? Я очень надеюсь, что не лично Вами =) Если автор обращался в OTRS, хорошо бы ему сообщить об этом на странице обсуждения номинации самостоятельно. В ответ на обращение в службу OTRS, на загруженные им изображения установят шаблон со всей необходимой информацией. Вот пример [[26]] оформления [[27]] тикета от этой службы. После такого разрешения, файл разумеется не тронут. Кстати, хорошо бы автору принять участие в дискуссии самостоятельно, если он в этом заинтересован. Пока интереса с его стороны не наблюдается вовсе, что наводит на некоторые размышления. Хорошего Вам дня. Cap1000 (talk) 10:46, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- Own work. The author of the website and photos in it = author photos Vitaly Bry.--Qweasdqwe (talk) 05:17, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
- Просьба номинатору не писать ложную информацию. Если у вас есть сомнение в авторстве, то так и пишете, а не придумывайте не существующее отрицание--Qweasdqwe (talk) 05:33, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: As noted, this appears on a web site with an explicit copyright notice. Therefore policy requires that the actual photographer send a free license to OTRS. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:19, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
It is only a line. Alan Liefting (talk) 01:18, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- The line is in use. I'm not sure if this is correct. --Stefan4 (talk) 01:34, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- It seem another case of poor quality wiki editing. It is an image to explain DC current There are plenty of far better image at Category:Direct current. Alan Liefting (talk) 02:10, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep, per Stefan4. According to COM:INUSE, when a file is in use, quality (a very subjective and ambiguous term) does not matter in most of cases (like this). Then, file in scope. --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:21, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- The way I see it is that in the real world it would be equivalent to keeping for ever a piece of paper with a line on it to demonstrate part of a lesson on direct current. I am not arguing about the quality (it is a nice straight line (LOL), although it does have too much padding) it is the senselessness in having something like this kept because of poor quality wiki editing. Alan Liefting (talk) 03:29, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Again, the file is in use, and therefore in scope according the COM:PS. You're an experienced user and you know the Commons policies. --Amitie 10g (talk) 04:36, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- The way I see it is that in the real world it would be equivalent to keeping for ever a piece of paper with a line on it to demonstrate part of a lesson on direct current. I am not arguing about the quality (it is a nice straight line (LOL), although it does have too much padding) it is the senselessness in having something like this kept because of poor quality wiki editing. Alan Liefting (talk) 03:29, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- It is no longer in use since I have removed it from the page and suggested a better alternative. Alan Liefting (talk) 04:59, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- I've reverted your edition in the cs.wikipedia. Unless you replace the file with a better one (instead of waiting for others to do them), I'll consider that edition as vandalism.
- The problem with this DR is that is based in your opinion about the graphic quality or anything else, instead of the scope of that. We've mentioned more than once the COM:PS, but you still ignore that. Once again, when a file is in use, is in scope. --Amitie 10g (talk) 14:39, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- It is no longer in use since I have removed it from the page and suggested a better alternative. Alan Liefting (talk) 04:59, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- You have an odd definition of vandalism. Why would the removal of an image and suggesting a better quality one be regardedas vandalism?
- Also, we don't have to slavishly follow policy if it is at the expense of quality do we? Alan Liefting (talk) 16:36, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. The file was in use on w:cs:Stejnosměrný proud, until Alan Liefting rather strangely removed it without adding a better image in its place. —Mr. Granger (talk · contribs) 12:47, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- It was not a "strange" edit on my part. As I had stated in my edit summary there are better images available. Alan Liefting (talk) 16:36, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: It is a violation of our practice to remove an "in use" image from WP during a DR. It certainly borders on vandalism to do so without replacing it with another image. While I agree that this is a strange image, our policy is very clear, in use images cannot be deleted except for copyvio. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:22, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Cambridge
editUnused personal snapshots, some of poor quality, that are of no educational use.
- Oppose. The Central Square of Cambridge, Massachusetts, after a blizzard - doesn't look useless to me. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 14:55, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
- File:Central Square (8470318647).jpg
- File:Dana Park (8470321161).jpg
- File:Dana Park (8470322739).jpg
- File:Dana Park (8471416482).jpg
- File:Dana Park (8471419982).jpg
- File:Early morning, blizzard still in progress (8471401994).jpg
- File:Ice accumulating on the windows (8470304697).jpg
- File:Kelly Rd (8470325093).jpg
- Oppose. I don't think we have another photo of this street in Cambridge, Massachusetts. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 14:55, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose. I don't think we have another photo of this park in Cambridge, Massachusetts. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 14:55, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
- File:Magazine Beach (8470329859).jpg
- File:Magazine Beach (8471424492).jpg
- File:Magazine Beach (8471425334).jpg
- File:Magazine St (8470309171).jpg
- File:Magazine St (8471406724).jpg
- Oppose. I don't think we have another photo of this street in Cambridge, Massachusetts. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 14:55, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
- File:Magazine St (8471408398).jpg
- File:Magazine St (8471411738).jpg
- File:Magazine St (8471422480).jpg
Alan Liefting (talk) 00:26, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: I think the concerns in this series of images are too variable to lump them into a single deletion nomination. I would not oppose a case-by-case review of some of these images, all of which are correctly licensed from flickr sources. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:52, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
PD-Art does not apply, since this seems to be a recent photo. The uploader stated the following, in the talk page:
- This photo is scanned from books Tatras Mountain Rescue, issued by the State Forests of the Tatra National Park in the Tatra Lomnica in 2000. Authors of many frames are more. Some no longer live. It is not possible to identify the author, because it is under the photo listed.
It is very unlikely that the author of the photo died more than 70 years ago (given the content and the appearance of the photo). Razvan Socol (talk) 10:58, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- The book is more of authors who can not be identified by photographs — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tatransky (talk • contribs)
Deleted: Not possible for author to have been dead 70 years for a 2000 photograph. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:56, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jon Phillips (talk · contribs)
editOut of scope...
- File:Bassel in High School.jpg
- File:Bassel in College.jpg
- File:Baby Bassel 19.JPG
- File:Baby Bassel 18.JPG
- File:Baby Bassel 17.JPG
- File:Baby Bassel 16.JPG
- File:Baby Bassel 15.JPG
- File:Baby Bassel 14.JPG
- File:Baby Bassel 13.JPG
- File:Baby Bassel 12.jpgest music
- File:Baby Bassel 11.jpg
- File:Baby Bassel 10.jpg
- File:Baby Bassel 09.jpg
- File:Baby Bassel 08.jpg
- File:Baby Bassel 07.jpg
- File:Baby Bassel 06.jpg
- File:Baby Bassel 05.jpg
- File:Baby Bassel 04.jpg
- File:Baby Bassel 03.jpg
- File:Baby Bassel 02.jpg
- File:Baby Bassel 01.JPG
- File:Naihan Li Biography Portrait.jpeg
Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:05, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination See en:Bassel Khartabil. Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:15, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks. Here is more rationale on keeping: Bassel is a notable person on Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bassel_Khartabil And, this Saturday in San Francisco, at the Wikimedia offices there is an editathon to improve the information about Bassel and Syrian detainees. This is feeder content for that edithon. https://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/45042 https://www.eff.org/event/wikipedia-edit-thon-freebassel-day-2015 Jon Phillips (talk) 15:18, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Also, on the Naihan Li portrait, the artist is a personal acquaintance of mine and she provided that photo to me to be used, so I have her consent. Should that be listed on the file somewhere? Jon Phillips (talk) 15:18, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep, of course. But…, please tell us Jon Phillips, how is it possible that people meet for an “editathon”, at the Wikimedia offices, no less, and the files about this subject are so atrociously categorized? I’ll gladly clean up the whole thing by hosting an one-man editathon at my own “offices”, for 0.01% of budget of the San Francisco event — deal? -- Tuválkin ✉ 12:01, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jon Phillips (talk · contribs)
editAll of these list authors who are not the uploader. In most cases, the listed author is the subject, which cannot be correct. We cannot keep any of them without a license from the actual photographers. Also, no matter how notable the person is, 19 baby pictures and 9 engagement party pictures are way too many.
- File:Bassel and Noura Engagement Party 09.JPG
- File:Bassel and Noura Engagement Party 08.JPG
- File:Bassel and Noura Engagement Party 07.JPG
- File:Bassel and Noura Engagement Party 06.JPG
- File:Bassel and Noura Engagement Party 05.JPG
- File:Bassel and Noura Engagement Party 04.JPG
- File:Bassel and Noura Engagement Party 03.JPG
- File:Bassel and Noura Engagement Party 01.JPG
- File:Bassel and Noura Engagement Party 02.JPG
- File:Bassel in High School.jpg
- File:Bassel in College.jpg
- File:Baby Bassel 19.JPG
- File:Baby Bassel 18.JPG
- File:Baby Bassel 17.JPG
- File:Baby Bassel 16.JPG
- File:Baby Bassel 15.JPG
- File:Baby Bassel 14.JPG
- File:Baby Bassel 13.JPG
- File:Baby Bassel 12.jpg
- File:Baby Bassel 11.jpg
- File:Baby Bassel 10.jpg
- File:Baby Bassel 09.jpg
- File:Baby Bassel 08.jpg
- File:Baby Bassel 07.jpg
- File:Baby Bassel 06.jpg
- File:Baby Bassel 05.jpg
- File:Baby Bassel 04.jpg
- File:Baby Bassel 03.jpg
- File:Baby Bassel 02.jpg
- File:Baby Bassel 01.JPG
- File:Young Bassel Blurry.jpg
- File:Young Bassel Playing.jpg
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:54, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
James, we need these images for the Wikimedia, CC, and EFF promoted editathon TODAY!
Hi, its not out of scope, as Bassel is a notable person on Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bassel_Khartabil
And, this Saturday in San Francisco, at the Wikimedia offices there is an editathon to improve the information about Bassel and Syrian detainees. This is feeder content for that edithon.
- https://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/45042
- https://www.eff.org/event/wikipedia-edit-thon-freebassel-day-2015
Jon Phillips (talk) 04:25, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
- First, the major issue here is copyright violation, not scope. You would be foolish to do anything with any of these images until you settle that. You may want these images very badly, but you cannot keep them on Commons unless you can show that there is a free license for them. Merely owning copies of photographs does not make one the copyright holder -- copyright is almost always held by the photographer or his heirs. Transferring or licensing copyright requires a formal written agreement.
- The listed source on most of them is Noura Ghazi Safadi. She is listed as the author on some of them, while Bassel Safadia is listed as author on others. Obviously neither of them is the author of images in which they appear. You cannot seriously expect us to believe that Noura Ghazi Safadi is the photographer of the baby pictures of her husband.
- A third party is listed as source and author on several of them. There is no evidence that he has licensed their use.
- You cannot simply upload pictures from unknown photographers, slap a CC-0 license on them, and expect Commons to keep them. In order for these to remain on Commons, they must be properly licensed by their photographers.
- By far less important is the scope issue. Except for Jesus Christ, I doubt that we have kept 19 baby pictures of anyone. It simply clutters up the category to keep them all -- in fact, since his babyhood was probably not notable, I doubt that any of them are actually in scope, but I won't argue that point. To a lesser extent, the same is true of the engagement party pictures.
- Unless you can get free licenses from the photographers, I think your best course of action is to accede to the deletion here and upload a limited number of them to WP:EN under its Fair Use policy. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:00, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
- Working to get written proof to you. Please hold off on deletion. Syria is a war torn place, where people are scared to go on record in writing, and then communication is not as fast as some of the wikipedia editors. Please bear with. Jon Phillips (talk) 07:03, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
- Nevertheless a certain quality level should be kept. If these were images of Joe Sixpack one would say „private image collection“ and „must be realistically useful for an educational purpose“ and they would get deleted. Doesn't obviously match highly notable persons like software developers. Funny, so I agree with Jim --Achim (talk) 19:19, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: This series of personal images included rephotographed baby pictures, high school and college "yearbook" pictures, a series of man and woman - some sideways - others right side up. No indication of user's own work here and regardless of notability of subject or lack thereof, the images require proper licenses to be hosted on Commons. Content for "edit-a-thons" must also be freely licensed, sourced, described & categorized. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:03, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Updated version has been uploaded and posted SandHills (talk) 18:30, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Newer version uploaded SandHills (talk) 01:04, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
updated revision posted SandHills (talk) 23:12, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted / Uploader requested and un used.--Fanghong (talk) 01:54, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
impossible to view! Bramfab (talk) 13:53, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- I agree the quality is problematic, but perhaps it could be enhanced a bit with some contrast changes? We have no other photos of that skeleton. FunkMonk (talk) 13:58, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- ¿Only offer so they are going to remove ?. I will try to do something.--Levi bernardo 21:18, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep per COM:INUSE (currently used on the Spanish Wikipedia article), but slap a {{Low quality}} template on it to encourage a better replacement. Animalparty (talk) 01:00, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: In use. INeverCry 18:01, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
This picture had already been nominated, and due to the poor quality of the image and to which there are now photographs of Coahuilaceratops, I ask that this photograph be deleted. Levi bernardo 03:59, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep It's the only photograph of a complete skeleton of Coahuilaceratops. Therefore it's useful (the only image is always the best one).--Pere prlpz (talk) 21:40, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. JGHowes talk 23:30, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
ทำผิด..... DanMTaylor (talk) 11:32, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:03, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Globus450000 (talk · contribs)
editUnclear authorship information. Some of them (for instance, the Dolores Ibárruri 'Pasionaria' picture) are obviously not the uploader's work. Others could be maybe covered by some Soviet PD tags. In general, most of them are clearly not the uploader's work. The only information available comes from ru:Гайдаенко, Иван Петрович. It seems as if the person described in the article in the Russian Wikipedia is the subject of the pictures but, in any case, the photographer.
- File:Иван Гайдаенко 33.jpg
- File:Иван Гайдаенко 32.jpg
- File:Иван Гайдаенко 31.jpg
- File:Иван Гайдаенко 30.jpg
- File:Иван Гайдаенко 29.jpg
- File:Иван Гайдаенко 26.jpg
- File:Иван Гайдаенко 25.jpg
- File:Иван Гайдаенко 28.jpg
- File:Иван Гайдаенко 23.jpg
- File:Иван Гайдаенко 22.jpg
- File:Иван Гайдаенко 24.jpg
- File:Иван Гайдаенко 21.jpg
- File:Иван Гайдаенко 20.jpg
- File:Иван Гайдаенко 19.jpg
- File:Иван Гайдаенко 18.jpg
- File:Иван Гайдаенко 17.jpg
- File:Иван Гайдаенко 16.jpg
- File:Иван Гайдаенко 14.jpg
- File:Иван Гайдаенко 15.jpg
- File:Иван Гайдаенко 13.jpg
- File:Иван Гайдаенко 11.jpg
- File:Иван Гайдаенко 12.jpg
- File:Иван Гайдаенко 10.jpg
- File:Иван Гайдаенко 07.jpg
- File:Иван Гайдаенко 09.jpg
- File:Иван Гайдаенко 08.jpg
- File:Иван Гайдаенко 06.jpg
- File:Иван Гайдаенко 05.jpg
- File:Иван Гайдаенко 04.jpg
- File:Иван Гайдаенко 01.jpg
- File:Иван Гайдаенко 02.jpg
- File:Иван Гайдаенко 03.jpg
Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 13:30, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PRP. INeverCry 18:02, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
is the uploader really an author of all individual photos?.. Same for File:Основатели традиций.jpg Pibwl (talk) 15:29, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PRP. INeverCry 18:04, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
any information on copyright. tagged as photo from livejournal.com by author Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 15:30, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:04, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
According to Flickr, this isn't a free image. -- Yuval Y • Chat • 03:45, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:06, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Duplicate with different cropping of Image:Myrmicaria brunnea8.jpg --Shyamal 10:13, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Kept: Different cropping means it's not a duplicate. INeverCry 18:08, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Duplicate AlbertoGG (talk) 12:09, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:10, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
mauvaise image Foxpry (talk) 01:19, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:11, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
makedonska kamenica 79.141.116.161 22:09, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
Kept: In use. INeverCry 18:11, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
This request makes me laugh a lot... since when this image is obscene Mr 200.90.252.120 !;) take care Carlos Botelho 03:05, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
error file Newresid (talk) 16:26, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:12, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
to go for piknak 24.44.74.207 21:55, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
uploaded wrong file Gh1304 (talk) 21:54, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:15, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo. Rapsar (talk) 08:17, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:15, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Wrong file name. Same file name exists on en.wiki.I am sorry.--JL 09 (talk) 12:54, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Kept: In use. INeverCry 18:15, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Duplicate WunderkindSA (talk) 14:29, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
Kept: No duplicate in user's uploads. INeverCry 18:17, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Please delete, this image is replaced by Spider anatomy.png. -B kimmel (talk) 17:13, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
Kept: In use. INeverCry 18:18, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
error, an other file exite Erwan1972 (talk) 11:18, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
Kept: In use. INeverCry 18:18, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused duplicity to File:Portret 1.jpg Gampe (talk) 12:52, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:19, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
change username StevePetno (talk) 17:28, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
Kept: Not valid dr reason. INeverCry 18:20, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
This image is of poor quality. MH1987 (talk) 13:20, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:20, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
This picture is a morphed version of the original picture of Swmay Ramanuja. Kindly don't allow this image in Wikimedia as it does not represent the true picuture of the Holy saint.
Kept: In use. INeverCry 18:21, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
No indication of free license at source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:10, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
La foto me pertenece es de mi autoría tengo los derechos sobre la misma--Ruwette 2 (talk) 23:04, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Ellin Beltz, my two cents, none of the current files around should be labeled as 'No indication of free license at source', so wondering myself if you can prove that it IS NOT free licensed. Under such condition you should delete 20.000 current files per day. Please, be wise, we need openminded editors and helping hands to our wiki task, instead of deletions of about everything uploaded around and being afraid of certain 'b... b... but what if'. Thanks for reading.--Gilwellian (talk) 12:53, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
- The uploader left a message on my talk page, "Hi, Ellin-File:Logo Escuela de Bellas Artes Lola Mora.jpg I wanted to delete it and could not, it certainly is very low resolution .
You can delete you forgive my poor English , I speak Spanish .best regard--Ruwette 2 (talk) 11:47, 17 March 2015 (UTC)"
Deleted: INeverCry 18:21, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Notice right and left arrows watermarked on image which shows it came from a slideshow. Unlikely to be user's own work, likely COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:20, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:23, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Duplicated at --Bình Giang 15:24, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Kept: In use. INeverCry 18:23, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Wrong File Verlerg (talk) 15:04, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:23, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Empty. --NatigKrolik (talk) 17:44, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Not empty. INeverCry 18:24, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
This file is corrupted in wikicommons data base--Gisling (talk) 13:05, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
Kept: In use. INeverCry 18:24, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
it's indecent 80.200.0.181 16:20, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Kept: redirect. INeverCry 18:25, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Useless Andrea 93 (talk) 06:37, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Kept: A decent pic of a keyboard. Not useless. INeverCry 18:26, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Identic photo alredy exists Tr6637 (talk) 17:32, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
Kept: In use. INeverCry 18:26, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
wrong file uploaded Stickinho (talk) 19:35, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
Kept: In use. INeverCry 18:26, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request - the image is the same like the file "cornerstone_heads", so no use for this anymore
Not PD yet. Author of both subject and phot died in 1947 EvilFreD overleg 15:48, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Kept: DR reverted by nominator. INeverCry 18:29, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
file is corrupt Matrixplay (talk) 08:33, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
Kept: Looks fixed. INeverCry 18:30, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
copy of File:Staple-Wizard hg.jpg Hannes Grobe (talk) 18:27, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
People shown dislike to be published Wualex (talk) 08:58, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:34, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
This image is ok, I'm sory. ferbr1 (talk) 21:22, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
Please delete this file because it is with a wrong name.
--Marcric (talk) 20:03, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
duplicate, wrong name (my bad) Rror (talk) 23:59, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
two instances of same file Blago Tebi (talk) 14:34, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
This file was inadvertently uploaded before I noticed the map's title does not display well. Since there is a PNG file of this asset also available (and in use), I request it be deleted.
Deleted: INeverCry 18:36, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Wrong Size, uploaded a new one! DwarfNRG (talk) 20:58, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
an example - obviously a mistake Ino32 (talk) 13:18, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:37, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
error Inventamultimedia (talk) 10:03, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
Kept: INeverCry 18:38, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
- Deleted. I overrule the decision. Small photo without metadata, own work is unlikely. Uploader's request next day after upload, this would qualify even for speedy deletion. Taivo (talk) 09:42, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Wrong name, correct name is Translandia (ship, 1976), --PjotrMahh1 (talk) 11:48, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:38, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
nie plik a kategorię chcę stworzyć asiu (talk) 11:48, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
mistaken upload Courseinfo98 (talk) 20:40, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Kept: In use. INeverCry 18:39, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Ще кача нова версия. Tonysd (talk) 13:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:40, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Wrong file name. MPNLIS (talk) 15:09, 24 January 2010 (UTC) PLEASE DELETE THIS FILE
{{speedydelete|Image mis-named}} Huihui703 (talk) 17:20, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:42, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Copyrighted film poster (painting by Angelika Rößler) within an exhibition. Depiction of poster is no "Beiwerk", but in focus, therefore copyright violation. Paulae (talk) 09:57, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment I think FoP would apply here. Yann (talk) 11:52, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
- DeleteYann, this is indoors in Germany -- why do you think FOP applies? It looks to me like a no-brainer DW copyvio. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:44, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- Is this a museum? Open to the public? Regards, Yann (talk) 11:17, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- DeleteYann, this is indoors in Germany -- why do you think FOP applies? It looks to me like a no-brainer DW copyvio. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:44, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- I don't know, but even if it is, as far as I know, German FOP applies only outdoors. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me)
Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:34, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jahn1234567890 (talk · contribs)
editAll rights reserved, copyright violation
- File:Morgan Shepherd 2004.jpg
- File:Morgan Shepherd Pocono 2003.jpg
- File:Morgan Shepherd Watkins Glen 2004.jpg
- File:Morgan Shepherd techline 2004.jpg
AntonTalk 18:29, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
I Forgot to add a source per picture and I fixed that now. The photo should redirect to the flickr photo now. Then I screwed up by accidentally deleting the license. djr7189 gave me permission to use these pictures on wikipedia. Jahn1234567890 (talk) 18:36, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- @Jahn1234567890: The images are copyrighted. Commons does not accept such files. Please visit flickr links and see the status of copyright. Ask me if you have questions. --AntonTalk 18:43, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- @AntanO: I'm not sure what I did wrong. Did I add the picture's under the wrong license? flickr adviced me to ask the owners of the pictures so I asked his permisson. Jahn1234567890 (talk) 18:57, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- I am afraid you copied the images that does not have acceptable licence. For permission, see Open-source Ticket Request System --AntonTalk 19:12, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- What should I do to make sure the pictures can stay on wikipedia? Jahn1234567890 (talk) 19:19, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- @AntanO: The owner agreed to change the license. Everything should be fine now I guess? Jahn1234567890 (talk) 12:59, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- If owner can change, I guess it would be fine. Please check that was the license ok and put a note here, then admin would talk care. Otherwise, you should approach Open-source Ticket Request System --AntonTalk 13:12, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- @AntanO: Everything is ok now. The correct license is on now as well. But what kind of note do I need to add? Jahn1234567890 (talk) 13:57, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- If owner can change, I guess it would be fine. Please check that was the license ok and put a note here, then admin would talk care. Otherwise, you should approach Open-source Ticket Request System --AntonTalk 13:12, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- @AntanO: The owner agreed to change the license. Everything should be fine now I guess? Jahn1234567890 (talk) 12:59, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- What should I do to make sure the pictures can stay on wikipedia? Jahn1234567890 (talk) 19:19, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- I am afraid you copied the images that does not have acceptable licence. For permission, see Open-source Ticket Request System --AntonTalk 19:12, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- @AntanO: I'm not sure what I did wrong. Did I add the picture's under the wrong license? flickr adviced me to ask the owners of the pictures so I asked his permisson. Jahn1234567890 (talk) 18:57, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Didym (talk) 22:49, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. Blurry and unused personal image. Reguyla (talk) 19:26, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Support delete. -- Deadstar (msg) 14:38, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 22:46, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
I Alexey Glyva are the author and owner of the exclusive rights to this photo (quay Saratov bridge), never gave permission to place pictures on Wikipedia, and has not placed himself, did not give exclusive rights to the image. The use of pictures, and spread it on the license Wikipedia is illegal and violates my copyright and exclusive rights. I pointed out this article, where you previously used the photo, and require to remove it from the warehouse to Wikipedia. You can contact with me by e-mail [email protected]. /// Я Алексей Глыва, являюсь автором и владельцем исключительных прав на эту фотографию (набережная саратова с моста), никогда не давал разрешения на размещение фотографии в википедии, и не размещал сам, не передавал исключительных прав на изображение. Использование фотографии, и распространение ее по лицензиям википедии противозаконно и нарушает мои авторские и исключительные права. Я указывал это в статье, где ранее использовалась фотография, и требую удалить ее из склада википедии. Связаться со мной можно по электронной почте [email protected] 88.147.153.224 22:06, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: If you actually are the copyright holder, please contact to OTRS. Also, no other souces of this picture found in Google Images Search in other place than Commons. --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:33, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment:Заметьте, Ваше фото в 16 статьях на разных языках используется. Это огромная аудитория. --Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 12:41, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment:я не знаю, что такое OTRS. Для чего мне замечать, в скольки статьях, и на скольки языках используется моя фотография? Мои права охраняются законами Российской Федерации, мне не нужно регистрировать свою интеллектуальную собственность. Публикация мною моей фотографии в открытом доступе, не дает права посторонним брать ее, кадрировать (что было сделано справа на фото), осуществлять показ, без моего письменного согласия, тем более, в свободных лицензиях. Публикуя ее в википеддии, вы вводите в заблуждение тех, кто в последствии берет фотографию, производит на ее основе рекламную печатную продукцию, подпадая под судебную ответственность.//// I don't know what OTRS. What I notice in how many articles and how many languages you use my picture? My rights are protected by the laws of the Russian Federation, I do not need to register their intellectual property. Publication I have my pictures in the public domain, does not give the right of strangers to take her, framing (what was done right in the photo), to carry the show without my written consent, especially in free licenses. Publishing it in Wikipedia, you mislead those who later takes the photo, produces on the basis of promotional printed products falling under legal liability.
Алексей Глыва.
- Notice that this is not Wikipedia, is Wikimedia Commons. Please provide a link where the file was uploaded before Commons (both the page that is published, and a direct link to the picture itself). --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:23, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: It is almost impossible to deal with the support of Wikipedia, like the endless bureaucracy, to add language and programming skills! Here is the link to the page that I have created on my personal website.[28]. These data are enough even in court to prove authorship, despite the presumption of authorship under the laws of the Russian Federation. If you ignore this information, I have the impression not only of incompetence support group Wiki, but even some evil intent, the legalization of the use of illegally taken from me the image.
Практически невозможно разобраться с поддержкой Википедии, похоже на бесконечный бюрократический аппарат, добавить сюда еще и незнания языка и навыков программирования! Вот ссылка на страничку, которую я специально создал на своем персональном сайте.[29]. Этих данных достаточно даже в суде, чтобы доказать авторство, несмотря на презумпцию авторства по законам Российской Федерации. Если игнорировать и эту информацию, то у меня уже складывается впечатление не только о некомпетентности группы поддержки Вики, но даже неком злом умысле, легализации использования, незаконно взятого у меня изображения.
(Алексей Глыва)
- Then Delete, but is better to replace this picture with a free-licensed one, because is widely in use. --Amitie 10g (talk) 16:20, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
I'm still waiting for my photo will be deleted. I don't work under a free license. Few in Russia who reads discussions and comments under the photo, so the number of cases of illegal use of photos in Commerce is growing every day! Алексей Глыва
Speedy delete. The link provided by Mr Glyva shows that this is a blatant copyvio, with his watermark having been cropped before being uploaded to Commons. Telling the copyright holder to contact OTRS is outrageous; the burden of proof rests on the uploader, not the the copyright holder. — Kpalion(talk) 09:40, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 22:41, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
mal subido Manya 1996 (talk) 17:07, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: accidental creation. JuTa 20:17, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
Not own work. This image is available in internet. Example: http://www.garden-ufa.ru/sejnectitovki.htm Cap1000 (talk) 00:52, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Own work. The author of the website and photos in it = author photos Vitaly Bry.--Qweasdqwe (talk) 05:16, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
- Просьба номинатору не писать ложную информацию. Если у вас есть сомнение в авторстве, то так и пишете, а не придумывайте не существующее отрицание--Qweasdqwe (talk) 05:33, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:20, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Orignally tagged by Huntster as a copyvio. Reason given was: "While NASA (and other space agencies/universities) contributed to Yohkoh, this was a mission by Japan's Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (the predecessor of JAXA), and thus its works would automatically be copyrighted. There is no evidence this image was produced by NASA, nor is there any evidence of the image being released from non-free copyright." -FASTILY 08:24, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. It is public domain. See [30] (that is the data policy of the Yokoh data archive), and then this announcement, "All YDAC users are allowed full access to any Yohkoh data more than twelve months old; this data is in the public domain. (my emphasis). Rights were originally reserved. However, the Japanese project released all the data, long ago. --Abd (talk) 19:56, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- It is possible that the red image was prepared by NASA, as a derivative work from Yohkoh data. Thus the NASA public domain policy is relevant as well. Here is another image apparently derived from the same data. --Abd (talk) 20:13, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Thank you for finding this Abd Natuur12 (talk) 19:21, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
The author is given as the name of the artist portrayed but this clearly not the case thus there is a lack of author in this file and also no permission is given MoiraMoira (talk) 10:28, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment The page in which this image is used is being considered for deletion. There is artwork in this image as well as a person. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:55, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:22, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Нарушение авторских прав Higimo (talk) 10:57, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Категорически не согласен
- )
Так получилось, что этот файл я загрузил по просьбе правообладателей, т.к. они понимают в использовании Wiki ещё меньше чем я :) Таким образом, меня можно считать их официальным представителем. Им это изображение было необходимо для иллюстрации статьи Буторина, Полина Андреевна. Я занимаюсь поддержкой официального сайта Полины, ссылку на который я указал при загрузке файла, в качестве автора фотографии я указал её отца. Лицензия Creative Commons для данного изображения была указана с их согласия - им было это не важно, т.к. CC на территории РФ на практике не применяется и законной силы не имеет. Я готов ответить на любые ваши вопросы и представить любые разумные доказательства правомочности загрузки этого файла. Жду вашей реакции. С уважением Stargazer-nsk (talk) 11:58, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Please provide evidence of permission via OTRS Natuur12 (talk) 19:25, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Historical template without any apparent use, the very few non-template documentation usages should be substituted. FDMS 4 13:00, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Still incoming links Natuur12 (talk) 19:24, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
špatně zvolený soubor Jirka576W (talk) 14:15, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete Natuur12 (talk) 19:25, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
špatně zvolený soubor Jirka576W (talk) 14:16, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete Natuur12 (talk) 19:26, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
špatně zvolený soubor Jirka576W (talk) 14:18, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete Natuur12 (talk) 19:26, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
špatně zvolený soubor Jirka576W (talk) 14:20, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete Natuur12 (talk) 19:26, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
špatně zvolený soubor Jirka576W (talk) 14:26, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete Natuur12 (talk) 19:26, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
špatně zvolený soubor Jirka576W (talk) 14:27, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete Natuur12 (talk) 19:26, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
COM:COPYVIO: License at source info page http://www.wibu.com/legal-notice.html is incompatible with Commons: The text, images and graphics and their arrangement on Wibu-Systems websites are all subject to copyright and other intellectual property protection. These objects may not be copied for commercial use or distribution, nor may these objects be modified. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:56, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: Just text and simple gradient, seems bellow the COM:TOO. --Amitie 10g (talk) 16:16, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment PRP: uploader claims images are free use, source page says they aren't. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:26, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Below TOO Natuur12 (talk) 19:27, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request Rodriguillo 18:57, 17 September 2006 (UTC) Superseded by an image .png
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 19:27, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
This was published in 2009. Well before the upload date Meidmanna (talk) 23:11, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:26, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on these obviously scanned diagrams. Check out the lovely centering and alignment of "Mezim..." Likely COM:COPYVIOs from some book or publicaiton.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:15, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Hi, these two pics were upload at a scanning workshop under my supervision. Yes, they are scanned from a book, but the autor (Ján Boldiš) wrote the book and also drew these diagrams, he is a copyright holder. I am pretty sure this is not a copyvio. Cheers --Vojtěch Veselý (talk) 21:05, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
kniha je ve fondu pražské městské knihovny--Špunt35 (talk) 15:01, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- Translation: You can find the book in Prague Municipal Library.
- And also in Czech National Library --Vojtěch Veselý (talk) 15:46, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Since Vojtěch Veselý can vouch for them I believe the images are okay but please send evidence of permission to OTRS as well. Natuur12 (talk) 19:32, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
because the licence plate is shown Ratel69 (talk) 07:35, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete Natuur12 (talk) 19:33, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
because the licence plate is shown Ratel69 (talk) 07:35, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete Natuur12 (talk) 19:33, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of date; newer versions available 66.194.65.205 22:53, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 19:33, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope due to upload for promotional purposes, see article to which it is attached. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:27, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
The name of the image was already taken, so I had to call it "e.V." at the end. The article is not promotional. It's informing about one of the dance organisations in Germany.
Deleted: Above TOO anyways Natuur12 (talk) 19:34, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
smaller size copy of File:Mohamadreza-ale-ebrahim-mohammad-reza-mohamad-alebrahim.jpg Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:37, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:37, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Source of information and basemap not given, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:38, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:37, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Trumpets.jpg --Kevin Rutherford (talk) 00:27, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 19:37, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Muse 1 .jpg. Quibik (talk) 00:15, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 19:37, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
error en nombre Perez222 (talk) 05:20, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 19:37, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
logo is no longer available for free use NilKol (talk) 14:41, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 19:37, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
This image was uploaded incorrectly. Scheridon (talk) 16:39, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 19:37, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Request by uploader Grenouille vert (talk) 03:32, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 19:38, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Appears to be by a living artist Snowmanradio (talk) 12:26, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:38, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
false description of the image (it is not Hernia of Shmorl, and blue circles show nothing)93.80.130.6 15:33, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 19:38, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request -79.200.75.143 17:32, 23 April 2012 (UTC) Wrong upload
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 19:38, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Please delete this image. It is an obsolete and misdrawn form of http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:US_State_Name_Etymologies3.png Haplolology 11:49, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 19:38, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Other one on this location, bigger and more beautiful. FrancoBras 16:47, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
- Replace all usage by the svg and Delete.--Didym (talk) 01:22, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:39, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Freigabe nur für kleine Version Albspotter (talk) 10:05, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 19:39, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Template:Duplikat Greggor65 (talk) 22:49, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 19:39, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
--Stevojanos (talk) 11:10, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 19:39, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
故宮內禁止攝影,圖像版權違法 Latinboy 06:21, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 19:39, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Duplicate for another file Mv87S (talk) 01:03, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 19:39, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Plaza Cobija is located in Cochabamba, not Cobija--Obaid Raza (talk) 14:00, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 19:39, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
This is not a duplicate image. The same user overwrote the existing image with a poor change, then uploaded that version again. Please do not delete. IFCAR 01:26, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 19:39, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
The author himself, M.P.Shishkin, asked not to publish his autograph. --Lkitrossky (talk) 08:27, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 19:39, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
uploaded a duplicate with a different name Kochas (talk) 23:36, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 19:39, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
old version and I have a new version JZTess (talk) 21:08, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 19:40, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
He subido la imagen equivocada|Wrong image uploaded Esv (talk) 21:54, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 19:42, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
test -AsCitiesBurn (talk) 13:05, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Seems to be a copyright violation. --Didym (talk) 01:18, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:42, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
I made a mistake in uploading it: didn't know how. Ryt 007 (talk) 00:56, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:42, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Authors request/Bad image Herr Mlinka (talk) 00:20, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:42, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Image copyrighted by publisher. See http://stores.lulu.com/store.php?fAcctID=26390078 173.176.10.65 22:45, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:42, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
bad focus Carlos Luis Cruz (talk) 11:07, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 19:42, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
there exists the same file with a different name ShiftFn (talk) 00:16, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 19:42, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
new file (png): File:POL Rogowo flag.PNG Locksmith (talk) 11:27, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 19:42, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Wrong license on this old map. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:45, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: PD-old Natuur12 (talk) 19:43, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
No indication of this license at the source given. Author name has no relation to uploader name. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:33, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello
Thank you for your concern. All the images on the page BIU Santé have been taken by Jacques Gana, our webmaster, as you can see here : http://www.biusante.parisdescartes.fr/contacts.htm
You can also see my name on this list, as a proof of my link with this institution.
The images on our site have been put last year under a Etalab license (close to CC-BY) : http://www2.biusante.parisdescartes.fr/wordpress/index.php/biu-sante-adopte-licence-ouverte-etalab/
It is true that the actual website is not very clear about the rights. The next version of our site will have a clear disclaimer (september 2015).
Please do not hesitate to contact me, for I would like to clarify this situation.
Regards
David Benoist, online services at BIU Santé, Paris --David benoist (talk) 18:52, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: very close to CC-BY . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:25, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
copyright violation Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 16:47, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: source has clear (c) . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:26, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
copyright violation Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 16:50, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:26, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by WayKurat as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted logo. Just text, seems bellow the COM:TOO. Copyrighted != Non-free. Amitie 10g (talk) 17:01, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: Please note that the image was created by one of en:User:Jerico900 sockpuppets. The said user have created a bunch of hoax logos and upload it here at Commons. Besides, the typeface used in this PAL logo is incorrect. The correct one is this. -WayKurat (talk) 01:55, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
- Hmmm well, you're right, and this file is not used, unline the SVG file at en:Wikipedia (that file may be a candidate to be moved to Commons). Until there is not a replacement (or the SVG has been moved to Commons), then weak keep. --Amitie 10g (talk) 17:03, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Aside from copyright question, which is real, this is unused and wrong, so why keep it? . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:28, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Blurry image, better one from same user at File:Geckosonwall3.JPG. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:16, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- 2 is no more blurry than 3, and blurry images are only deleted when there are more clear identical images, 1, 2, and 3 are not identical. Editor abcdef (talk) 04:06, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:29, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Blurry image, better one from same user at File:Geckosonwall3.JPG. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:17, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- 1 is no more blurry than 3, and blurry images are only deleted when there are more clear identical images, 1, 2, and 3 are not identical. Editor abcdef (talk) 04:07, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:29, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
copyright violation Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 17:30, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:33, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
not a free work Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 17:36, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:33, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
not a free work Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 17:36, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:33, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
not a free work Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 17:37, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:33, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
not a free work Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 17:37, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:33, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
not a free work Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 17:37, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:33, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
not a free work Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 17:37, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:34, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
not a free work Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 17:37, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:34, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
not a free work Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 17:37, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:34, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
not a free work Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 17:38, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:34, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
not a free work Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 17:39, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:34, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
copyright violation Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 17:46, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:34, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
not an own work Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 17:48, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:34, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Screenshot of http://vicariate.church.ua. Razvan Socol (talk) 18:16, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:35, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Updated revision uploaded and posted SandHills (talk) 18:31, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:35, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:46, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Updated revision uploaded and posted SandHills (talk) 18:33, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:46, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Revison uploaded and posted SandHills (talk) 18:33, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:46, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Newer version uploaded SandHills (talk) 18:34, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:46, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Revised version uploaded SandHills (talk) 18:35, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:46, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Newer version uploaded SandHills (talk) 18:36, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:46, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Out of source. Old personal image of a mountain. Its a pretty picture, but I don't think we need it here. Reguyla (talk) 19:59, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: No description, no cats, not useful . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:48, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation, there is no proof whatsoever this was published more than 70 years ago (read Chilean copyright law) Diego Grez return fire 20:03, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Estimado Diego
Me ha llegado un mail donde me invoca a discutir el borrado de esta fotografia
Como usted a visto en mi historial esta fotografia esta sacada del album familiar lo cual fue discutido por Anon, EugeneZelenko y User:Jameslwoodward otros , lo cual a traves de Anon fue aprovada la licencia {PD-Chile} para las fotografias que tuvieran 70 años de antiguedad como minimo. Esta es fotografia supera dicha antiguedad y desde siempre a sido conocida por estar en album familiar.
Esta fotografia fue revisa por Anon.
Esperando que lo anterior aclare lo expuesto por usted y agradesco la colaboracion de la comunidad en cuanto han la valorizado lo hecho por mi, lo Saluda --Juanjose1956 (talk) 23:14, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Diego, the Chilean law makes a work PD 70 years after creation if it was not published in the first 50 years after creation, see point C at Template talk:PD-Chile. I think that applies here. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:38, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- You're completely right. This nomination is now withdrawn --Diego Grez return fire 02:21, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:47, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
own request; has to be moved to better file name. -Andy king50 (talk) 19:04, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: by Denniss , closed by . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:37, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
derivative work with no information on copyright status of the original Dd1495 (talk) 18:35, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:13, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Because it is not joe robbie!!! Grouchymarks (talk) 20:56, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: The source says it is Joe Robbie, and a Google search is not conclusive, but the source also says that the image is by Roy Erickson who was not a state employee, so it is not PD. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:40, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Description: Video still from PUNKCAST#540. OTRS needed. 217.186.205.16 21:20, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:40, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
As per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle.
I'm also adding the following related logos to this request:
- File:Eurovision Song Contest logo.png
- File:Eurovision Song Contest new logo.png
- File:Unser Song für Dänemark 2014.png
I'll note that if this DR has a different outcome from the original one, then steps should be taken to undelete the original uploads in fairness to the uploaders. CT Cooper · talk 22:33, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- I'm going to request a permission for the use of File:Eurovision Song Contest logo 2015.svg on Commons. Badgon (talk) 10:48, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
- From the EBU? I think that's worth a go and might settle the issue. Though simply permission to use on Commons wouldn't be enough I'm afraid – they would have to release it under a free license, declare it to be public domain or similar. CT Cooper · talk 16:02, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
- @CT Cooper: Isn't it possible to just get the permission of the author? Is there no license on wikimedia for that? Well, then I think it's time for that. I'll request a permission as soon as possible. Let's see what happens then.
- Permission for what though? Permission to release it under a free license or into the public domain would be great. Permission to use on Commons only though is not sufficient as per Commons:Licensing. CT Cooper · talk 20:54, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- Maybe the solution is request an approval for the use of Eurovision generic logos in wikimedia commons. There are instructions for requesting approval on page 4 of this pdf from Eurovision website (http://www.eurovision.tv/upload/press-downloads/Generic/ESC_generic_identity_guidelines_v4.pdf). JoseDLG (talk) 20:43, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
- Unfortunately that guideline doesn't look promising. For one thing it expliclty forbids commercial use of the logo – availability for commercial use is a requirement for content to be hosted on Commons per Commons:Licensing. CT Cooper · talk 15:20, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
- Maybe the solution is request an approval for the use of Eurovision generic logos in wikimedia commons. There are instructions for requesting approval on page 4 of this pdf from Eurovision website (http://www.eurovision.tv/upload/press-downloads/Generic/ESC_generic_identity_guidelines_v4.pdf). JoseDLG (talk) 20:43, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
- Permission for what though? Permission to release it under a free license or into the public domain would be great. Permission to use on Commons only though is not sufficient as per Commons:Licensing. CT Cooper · talk 20:54, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
- @CT Cooper: Isn't it possible to just get the permission of the author? Is there no license on wikimedia for that? Well, then I think it's time for that. I'll request a permission as soon as possible. Let's see what happens then.
- From the EBU? I think that's worth a go and might settle the issue. Though simply permission to use on Commons wouldn't be enough I'm afraid – they would have to release it under a free license, declare it to be public domain or similar. CT Cooper · talk 16:02, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:40, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on this scan, probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:19, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
It is MY OWN work. I many times during many years travelled together with Vladimir Lysenko--СОРАН (talk) 06:35, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: User is trusted enough to believe him. We have a lot of trusted users who uploaded scans of their old photographs. Natuur12 (talk) 17:57, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
None of this uploader's imagery was own work, likely this one is not either. Nominated under COM:PRP. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:24, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
It is MY OWN work. I many times during many years travelled together with Vladimir Lysenko--СОРАН (talk) 06:38, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: User is trusted enough to believe him. We have a lot of trusted users who uploaded scans of their old photographs. Natuur12 (talk) 17:58, 9 April 2015 (UTC)