Commons:Requests for checkuser
Shortcuts: COM:CHECK • COM:RFCU • COM:SOCK
This is the place to request investigations of abuse of multiple accounts or of other circumstances that require use of checkuser privileges.
Requesting a check
These indicators are used by CheckUsers to allow easier at-a-glance reading of their notes, actions and comments. | |
---|---|
Request completed | |
Confirmed | Technically indistinguishable |
Likely | Possilikely |
Possible | Unlikely |
Inconclusive | Unrelated |
No action | Stale |
Request declined | |
Declined | Checkuser is not for fishing |
Checkuser is not magic pixie dust. | The CheckUser Magic 8-Ball says |
It looks like a duck to me | Checkuser is not a crystal ball. |
Information | |
Additional information needed | Deferred to |
Doing… | Info |
Please do not ask us to run checks without good reason; be aware of the following before requesting a check:
- Checkuser is a last resort for difficult cases; pursue other options first, such as posting on the administrator's noticeboard. (This is not a venue for requesting administrative action such as blocks or file clean-up.)
- Running a check will only be done to combat disruption on Commons, or as required to assist checkuser investigations on other Wikimedia wikis.
- Valid reasons for running a check include, for example: vandalism where a block of the underlying IP or IP range is needed and suspected block evasion, vote-stacking, or other disruption where technical evidence would prevent or reduce further disruption.
- Requests to check accounts already confirmed on other projects may be declined as redundant.
- Requests to run a check on yourself will be declined.
- Evidence is required. When you request a check, you must include a rationale that demonstrates (e.g., by including diffs) what the disruption to the project is, and why you believe the accounts are related.
- Requests to run a check without evidence or with ambiguous reasoning will result in delays or the request not being investigated.
- The privacy policy does not allow us to make a check that has the effect of revealing IP addresses.
Outcome
Responses will be brief in order to comply with Wikimedia privacy policy. Due to technical limitations, results are not always clear. Closed requests are archived after seven days.
Privacy concerns
If you feel that a checkuser request has led to a violation of the Wikimedia Foundation privacy policy regarding yourself, please refer the case to the Ombuds commission.
If this page is displaying outdated contents even after you refresh the page in your browser, please purge this page's cache.
Requests
editابن عرب العمريه العمري
edit- ابن عرب العمريه العمري (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Suspected related users
edit- عرب العمريه العمري (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Rationale, discussion and results
editReason:He returned after blocking his account to upload violation photos. Mohammed Qays 🗣 11:56, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Confirmed --Krd 12:08, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Please block this account: هزاع الظواهره العمري (talk · contribs) Mohammed Qays 🗣 17:21, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Krd Mohammed Qays 🗣 17:21, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Guishín Pastofrio
edit- Guishín Pastofrio (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Suspected related users
edit- AcutÁngulo (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Rationale, discussion and results
editReason: AcutÁngulo was registered today to upload images of Uruguayan politicians, the same topic of interest as Guishín Pastofrio, but at the same time it is on Spanish Wikipedia restoring controversial edits of the same subject. It is very possible that it is a DUCK but I want clear confirmation of the situation. Taichi (talk) 00:56, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Possible --Krd 07:12, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
Auntitis
edit- Auntitis (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Suspected related users
edit- Sarria2025 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Rationale, discussion and results
editReason: Accounts created the same day, and uploading the same deleted content: File:Oinarri aniztun blokea.webp and File:Oinarri aniztun blokeak.png. Yann (talk) 16:20, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Likely --Krd 05:26, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
Tamillifehacking
edit- Tamillifehacking (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Suspected related users
edit- DhayanidhiSK (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Rationale, discussion and results
editReason: DhayanidhiSK reuploaded deleted files previously uploaded by globally locked account Tamillifehacking. Yann (talk) 11:44, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Confirmed --Krd 12:17, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
Ricardinho da Souza Silva 7
edit- Ricardinho da Souza Silva 7 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Suspected related users
edit- Portalobo2020 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Rationale, discussion and results
editReason: Once again another duck. Banking edits have started both in Commons and eswiki. --Stïnger (会話) 04:52, 20 December 2024 (UTC).
- Inconclusive --Krd 05:28, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
Ricardinho da Souza Silva 7
edit- Ricardinho da Souza Silva 7 (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Suspected related users
edit- Supernumerario (talk • contribs • Luxo's • SUL • deleted contribs • logs • block user • block log )
Rationale, discussion and results
editReason: Another duck. Massive banking-related edits in Commons, extending to eswiki and enwiki as well. --Stïnger (会話) 13:29, 13 December 2024 (UTC).
- Confirmed --Krd 05:47, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- For older requests, please see Commons:Requests for checkuser/Archives