Package: src:wand; Maintainer for src:wand is Håvard F. Aasen <havard.f.aasen@pfft.no>;
Reported by: "Chris Lamb" <lamby@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 10:30:01 UTC
Severity: wishlist
Tags: fixed-upstream, patch
Found in version wand/0.6.1-1
Fixed in version 0.6.2-1
Done: Håvard Flaget Aasen <haavard_aasen@yahoo.no>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Forwarded to https://github.com/emcconville/wand/pull/484
View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox
Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, wrote: > Source: wand > Version: 0.6.1-1 > Severity: wishlist > Tags: patch > User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org > Usertags: randomness > X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bugs@lists.alioth.debian.org > > Hi, > > Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0] we noticed that > wand could not be built reproducibly. > > This was due to the documentation including the nondeterministic > memory references in the documentation. > > Patch attached that specifies these as ":exclude-members:" in Sphinx. > > [0] https://reproducible-builds.org/ > > > Regards, > > -- > ,''`. > : :' : Chris Lamb > `. `'` lamby@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk > `-&In-Reply-To=<5b587a1e-b200-4ea5-a4be-03bddf6c5eeb@sloti26t01>&subject=Re: wand: please make the build reproducible&References=<5b587a1e-b200-4ea5-a4be-03bddf6c5eeb@sloti26t01>">reply):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
[wand.diff.txt (text/plain, attachment)]
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/emcconville/wand/pull/484'.
Request was from "Chris Lamb" <lamby@debian.org>
to control@bugs.debian.org
.
(Tue, 26 May 2020 10:48:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #12 received at 961582@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, wrote: > forwarded 961582 https://github.com/emcconville/wand/pull/484 > thanks > > I've forwarded this upstream here: > > https://github.com/emcconville/wand/pull/484 > > > Regards, > > -- > ,''`. > : :' : Chris Lamb > `. `'` lamby@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk > `- > > ">reply):
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
Request was from debian-bts-link@lists.debian.org
to control@bugs.debian.org
.
(Mon, 01 Jun 2020 20:51:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message sent on
to "Chris Lamb" <lamby@debian.org>
:
Bug#961582.
(Tue, 14 Jul 2020 11:09:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #17 received at 961582-submitter@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
Message #22 received at 961582-quiet@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, wrote:
> Hi Håvard,
>
> > While there were several variations that failed, it still is one that
> > fails with your patch. The kernel variation.
>
> I cannot recall my original reasoning when I filed this bug, sorry.
> However, looking at the current output for diffoscope on our testing
> framework, wand is (still?) only varying based on the documentation
> and not the kernel variation:
>
> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/diffoscope-results/wand.html
>
> Could you elaborate why you mention kernel variations at all? (And
> 'experimental'; wand is not in Debian experimental.)
>
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> ,''`.
> : :' : Chris Lamb
> `. `'` lamby@debian.org 🍥 chris-lamb.co.uk
> `-
>
>
&In-Reply-To=
Message sent on
to "Chris Lamb" <lamby@debian.org>
:
Bug#961582.
(Thu, 16 Jul 2020 07:24:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message sent on
to "Chris Lamb" <lamby@debian.org>
:
Bug#961582.
(Mon, 20 Jul 2020 08:03:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #28 received at 961582-submitter@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, "experimental build". I see that this is referred to as "first build"
> and "second build" here [0].
> The reason I mentioned kernel variations is because when I tested the
> new version (0.6.2) which includes your patch (not yet packaged in
> Debian) reprotest still fails, and it fails when I use "$ reprotest
> --variations=kernel ..."
>
> Regards,
> Håvard
>
> [0] https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/index_variations.html
>
>
&subject=Re: Bug#961582: wand: please make the build reproducible&In-Reply-To=
Message #33 received at 961582@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, wrote: > Hi Håvard, > > > The reason I mentioned kernel variations is because when I tested the > > new version (0.6.2) which includes your patch (not yet packaged in > > Debian) reprotest still fails, and it fails when I use "$ reprotest > > --variations=kernel ..." > > I cannot think why changing the kernel would make any difference to > the difference in the document. It may be reproducible without this > variation, it is not clear from your comment. > > However, please either upload with this patch, or provide some kind of > (diffoscope?) output that I can see. Trying to guess at a distance is > not very efficient (or fun). > > Thanks. > > > Regards, > > -- > ,''`. > : :' : Chris Lamb > `. `'` lamby@debian.org 🍥 chris-lamb.co.uk > `- > > ">reply):
Reply sent
to Håvard Flaget Aasen <haavard_aasen@yahoo.no>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Mon, 28 Sep 2020 11:30:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #38 received at 961582-done@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
Bug archived.
Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <owner@bugs.debian.org>
to internal_control@bugs.debian.org
.
(Tue, 27 Oct 2020 07:27:27 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Send a report that this bug log contains spam.
Debbugs is free software and licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2. The current version can be obtained from https://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/.
Copyright © 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson, 2005-2017 Don Armstrong, and many other contributors.