Replies: 1 comment 5 replies
-
By this definition, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
You can find a guide here, it explain how you can avoid barel files as lib author : https://thepassle.netlify.app/blog/practical-barrel-file-guide-for-library-authors |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I did introduce the pattern of individual exports with 3.x, it was not received well and developer tooling wasn't ready to use it so I went back to a simple well-established If you care deeply about the amount of code you import then you likely already have a build process which resolves the imports and tree-shakes what you don't use. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
As a user, omg, it is so much better than 3.x, that was a nightmare. I don't know why anyone creates independent exports, that's just pain and suffering for everyone, please never go back to that. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
That being said, I don't think anything prohibits the module from having both a general |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Jose uses barel files that slow down performance, and causes large module graphs with unused modules.
For more information:
https://biomejs.dev/linter/rules/no-barrel-file/
https://marvinh.dev/blog/speeding-up-javascript-ecosystem-part-7/
Suggestion:
Refactor codes to remove barel files, setup a linter such as Biome or Eslint could help keep a clean code base.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions