-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add option for pipx instead of pip #19
Comments
What would the advantage of that be in an isolated environment like this? |
Compatability with the framework being developed in https://github.com/scientific-python/cookie for testing. |
Can you explain that a bit more? It feels unhelpful to layer more venv tools ontop of an already isolated env, but I don't know much about this |
At Astropy we've stopped supporting our own package template in favor of the scientific-python package guide. They have developed https://github.com/scientific-python/cookie. It would be great to increase compatibility with their work, since we officially endorse it. I would be happy however that happens, so I opened this PR to start requesting support for some differences I noticed between our testing frameworks (another is |
So do you mean we would run tox/nox using pipx rather than pip install tox and run it separately? |
Probably low priority, but would be nice if there were an option for pipx instead of pip.
build-python-dist/action.yml
Line 41 in 44d5b0d
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: