Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Problems mapping "Documents Official Language" and "Documents Unofficial Language" fields (BT-708-Part, BT-737-Part, BT-708-Lot, BT-737-Lot) #732

Open
csnyulas opened this issue Dec 18, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
aux: mapping it is related to the TED-SWS mappings project type: feature request something requested to be implemented in a future release
Milestone

Comments

@csnyulas
Copy link

While trying to map the eForms SDK fields BT-708-Part ("Documents Official Language") and BT-737-Part ("Documents Unofficial Language") (and the same applies for fields BT-708-Lot and BT-737-Lot as well), we realized that the official and unofficial languages in eForms are NOT always specified for a particular document, but sometimes may refer to a place where multiple documents can be accessed (e.g. a document folder or a website).
However, in EPO the epo:hasOfficialLanguage and epo:hasUnofficialLanguage properties are defined on the epo:Document class, and therefore the only way to map the values of these fields would be attach them to a epo:ProcurementDocument that is linked to an epo:AccessTerm through the epo:involvesProcurementDocument property (and which epo:AccessTerm can point to an epo:PlannedProcurementPart instance through epo:refersToPlannedPart or can be referred to from an epo:Lot through the epo:epo:isSubjectToLotSpecificTerm).
Unfortunately this does not reflect correctly the semantics encoded in the eForms notice.

image

@andreea-pasare andreea-pasare self-assigned this Dec 19, 2024
@andreea-pasare andreea-pasare added the aux: mapping it is related to the TED-SWS mappings project label Dec 19, 2024
@andreea-pasare
Copy link
Collaborator

@csnyulas, can you please provide an xml snippet for this use-case so we can better understand your request?

@andreea-pasare andreea-pasare added this to the 5.0.0 milestone Dec 19, 2024
@andreea-pasare andreea-pasare added the type: feature request something requested to be implemented in a future release label Dec 19, 2024
@andreea-pasare
Copy link
Collaborator

Implemented for ePO v5.0.0 as depicted below:
image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
aux: mapping it is related to the TED-SWS mappings project type: feature request something requested to be implemented in a future release
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants