Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix definitions for epo:hasItemStandardID and epo:hasConstraint #729

Open
AchillesDougalis opened this issue Dec 11, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
Assignees
Labels
act: for internal discussion it needs to be discussed within the team module: ePO core ePO core type: bug something implemented incorrectly in a release
Milestone

Comments

@AchillesDougalis
Copy link
Contributor

In 4.2.0, the original descriptions of epo:hasItemStandardID and epo:hasConstraint were accidentally overwritten as external concepts.

a4g:hasItemStandardID a owl:ObjectProperty ;
rdfs:isDefinedBy a4g:core ;
skos:definition "External concept defined by <xref scope=\"external\" href=\"https://www.dublincore.org/specifications/dublin-core/dcmi-terms/#http://purl.org/dc/terms/isReplacedBy\"><foreign otherprops=\"#0000ff\"><u>https://www.dublincore.org/specifications/dublin-core/dcmi-terms/#http://purl.org/dc/terms/isReplacedBy</u></foreign></xref> (epo-cat:Item -> adms:Identifier ( epo:hasItemStandardID))"@en ;
skos:prefLabel "Has item standard i d"@en ;
skos:historyNote "WG Approval 16/05/2023"@en .

a4g:hasConstraint a owl:ObjectProperty ;
rdfs:isDefinedBy a4g:core ;
skos:definition "External concept defined by <xref scope=\"external\" href=\"http://data.europa.eu/m8g/hasConstraint\"><foreign otherprops=\"#0000ff\"><u>http://data.europa.eu/m8g/hasConstraint</u></foreign></xref> (cccev:InformationRequirement -> cccev:Constraint ( epo:hasConstraint))"@en ;
skos:prefLabel "Has constraint"@en .

  • To restore the original definition of epo:hasItemStandardID in 5.0.0:
    epo:hasItemStandardID: The general identifier assigned to the concept based on a standard scheme.​Additional information: For example the GTIN scheme (Global Trade Item Number). WG approval 16/05/2023

  • epo:hasConstraint: Had no prior definition. So we should just remove the "external concept" part

@AchillesDougalis AchillesDougalis added type: bug something implemented incorrectly in a release module: ePO core ePO core act: for internal discussion it needs to be discussed within the team labels Dec 11, 2024
@AchillesDougalis AchillesDougalis added this to the 5.0.0 milestone Dec 11, 2024
@AchillesDougalis AchillesDougalis self-assigned this Dec 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
act: for internal discussion it needs to be discussed within the team module: ePO core ePO core type: bug something implemented incorrectly in a release
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant